The document discusses the dichotomies between personal learning environments (PLEs) and institutions. It presents results of a survey that asked questions about the relationship between PLEs and institutions. The main barriers to PLEs identified in the survey were institutional barriers, individual barriers, pedagogical barriers, and technological barriers. The debate section notes that cyberinfrastructure and changes in technology and attitudes could help leverage change, and that PLEs are bottom-up strategies that should be embedded within institutions to fill them with educational resources, while institutions provide necessary structure.

1. UNKEYNOTE2 The Dichotomies in Personal Learning Environments and Institutions Ismael Peña-López Jordi Adell

2. Good Morning!

3. Hashtag of the session #PLE_BCN + #Segunda_unkeynote_de_la_PLE_Conference_de_Barcelona_Que_Se_Celebra_En_El_Citilab_De_Cornellà_El_Viernes_Por_La_Mañana_(Linda_retuitéame) UNKEYNOTE2

4. #PLE_BCN #K2 Hashtag of the session UNKEYNOTE2

5. What are we going to do? (esto lo explicará Ismael) :-) © ScanTheVan UNKEYNOTE2

6. Shall we start? UNKEYNOTE2

7. PLEs in the university? PLE & Institutions Yes No Inside (e.g. SAPO) Outside (e.g. others) 38 UNKEYNOTE2 14 14 12 2

8. The student’s digital identity must be Isolated from the rest Identified as a whole Closed environment Open environment UNKEYNOTE2 +40 18 The university must be a Openness?

9. Who decides? The system The apprentice Consensuated / Institutional Social / P2P 2 UNKEYNOTE2 14 26 10 5 Credit must be And the Curriculum?

10. The main barriers are Institutional Individual Pedagogical Technological UNKEYNOTE2 Barriers (I) 25 14 7 10 7

11. The main barriers are Standardization Atomization Economic Organizational UNKEYNOTE2 Barriers (II) 2 6 4 36.5 7

12. Debate! UNKEYNOTE2

14. Ismael Peña-López @ictlogist Jordi Adell @jordi_a UNKEYNOTE2