Penetapan Area Beresiko Sanitasi Permukiman
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•1,991 views
Dokumen ini membahas tentang penetapan area berisiko berdasarkan tingkat risiko sanitasi di suatu wilayah. Proses penetapannya melibatkan pengumpulan data sekunder dan primer, analisis data, penentuan indeks risiko, dan diskusi untuk menetapkan skor akhir area berisiko. Hasil akhir dituangkan dalam peta area berisiko beserta deskripsi alasan pemilihan area-area berisiko.
![Tujuan dan Maksud ,[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Similar to Penetapan Area Beresiko Sanitasi Permukiman
Similar to Penetapan Area Beresiko Sanitasi Permukiman (20)
More from infosanitasi
More from infosanitasi (20)
Penetapan Area Beresiko Sanitasi Permukiman
- 1. PENETAPAN AREA BERISIKO
- 10. Instrumen Analisa Data Sekunder
- 11. Instrumen Analisa Persepsi SKPD
- 12. Instrumen Analisa Data EHRA
- 15. Peta Area Berisiko (Contoh: Kota Tegal)
- 16. Outline Buku Putih Sanitasi Bab 2: Gambaran Umum Wilayah Bab 3: Profil Sanitasi Wilayah Bab 4: Program Pengembangan Sanitasi Saat Ini dan Yang Direncanakan Bab 5: Prioritas Pengembangan Sanitasi Bab 1: Pendahuluan
Editor's Notes
- There are many methods that can be used to collect data for sanitation needs assessment. The best option is to use a variety of methods, as this will enable the assessor to cross-check the accuracy and reliability of the information. For example: demographic information, questionnaires, observations, group discussion, etc. Explain where do we get information The purpose of analysis is to obtain a clear picture of the current situation and provide the data necessary to prioritise interventions. Some of data may have to be estimated and assumptions made because of lack of information or time. The collected data were then assigned scores. Where indicated, multiply the base score number by ‘multiplier’ that weights the score so that quality (technical appropriateness, sustainability), quantity (number of facilities, distances) and usage (accessibility, o&m) have equal importance in the analysis.