This document provides background information on the creeds of Christianity, which were formulated in response to heresies that arose in the early church. It summarizes the key points of disagreement between orthodox Christians and Gnostics, including debates over the incarnation of Jesus and the resurrection of the body. It then outlines the formation of the Apostles' Creed and Nicene Creed, which aimed to clearly define core doctrines like the deity of Christ in order to refute heresies like Arianism.
3. Like all languages, it is very
tightly bound to the culture of
the people who speak it…
3
4. “In the beginning was the
Logos, and the Logos was
with God, and the Logos was
God… Through him all
things were made; without
him nothing was made that
has been made.” – John 1:1,3
4
16. They identified God closely
with “The Logos” and believed
that you are saved because
God grants a mystical union
with you, and you are therefore
enlightened and are brought
closer to God
16
28. But no “real” Christians
would need to be told this
Right?
28
29. Much of the stigma
surrounding all things
“carnal” is based in
remnants of this heresy
29
30. Sex, for example, is often seen as a
“necessary evil,” and that’s the primary
reason why Roman Catholicism insists
on the perpetual virginity of Mary, since it
teaches that she was untouched by sin
See, for example, sections
499-500 in the
Catholic Catechism
30
34. Here the Creed hammers home the point
that he was really dead
The reference to the descent into Hell here
makes it clear that the death of Jesus was
not just an illusion, a swoon or a coma, but
death in every sense of the word…
34
35. “I believe in the Holy Ghost,
the holy catholic church, the
communion of saints,”
35
36. The Gnostics believed that the
most important Christian
doctrines were reserved for a
select few:
those “in the know” who have
had a special mystical
experience
36
37. Hence the term “catholic,” or
universal, which distinguished
them from the Gnostics
37
41. The chief goal of the
Gnostics was to
become free forever
from the taint of
matter and the
shackles of the body,
and to return to the
heavenly realm as
Pure Spirit
41
45. As it says in Revelation 21, God will create a
“new heaven and new earth” for us to live in
The physical world will be remade for us to
inhabit (albeit with a great many changes)
45
51. When Arius of Alexandria
petitioned Constantine for
support in 327 AD, it
became clear that a more
formal, precise statement
of what “Christian” means
was needed
51
52. The Arian heresy is often
described as the denial of
the deity of Christ
Like everything with that big
an impact, it’s not nearly
that simple
52
53. According to the Arians, Christ
is “the first and greatest creation
of Jehovah God and His active
agent in creating all things.”
“the Son is a mighty god but not
Jehovah God.”
53
57. “We believe in one God, the
Father, the Almighty, maker
of heaven and earth, of all
that is, seen and unseen. We
believe in one Lord, Jesus
Christ, the only Son of God,”
57
58. Here and elsewhere (such as John
1:14) the Greek has “monogenetos
huios”
An English translation may read
either “only Son” or “only begotten
Son”
58
60. Arius was fond of saying,
“The Logos is not eternal.
God begat him, and before
he was begotten, he did not
exist.”
60
61. The Athanasians (Bishop
Athanasius was the leader
of those that battled the
Arians) replied that the
begetting of the Logos was
not an event in time, but an
eternal relationship
61
63. A favorite analogy of the
Athanasians was the following:
Light is continuously streaming
forth from the sun
The rays of light are derived from
the sun, and not vice versa
63
64. The analogy is further appropriate
because we can know the sun only
through the rays of light that it emits
To see the sunlight is to see the sun
64
65. As Jesus says, “He who has
seen me has seen the Father.”
(John 14:9)
65
66. “true God from true God,
begotten, not made, of one
being with the Father.”
66
67. This the Arians simply
could not interpret as
meaning what they
believed
67
68. “Through him all things were
made. For us and for our
salvation he came down from
heaven: by the power of the Holy
Spirit he became incarnate from
the Virgin Mary, and was made
man. For our sake he was
crucified under Pontius Pilate; he
suffered death and was buried.”
68
69. Only pausing here to note that the older
translation of the last phrase here was
simply, “He suffered and was buried.”
Apparently by the time of Nicaea, it was no
longer necessary to emphasize that Christ
had really died at Calvary, as it had been
spelled out in the Apostles’ Creed
69
70. “On the third day he rose again in
accordance with the Scriptures; he
ascended into heaven and is seated at the
right hand of the Father. He will come
again in glory to judge the living and the
dead, and his kingdom will have no end.
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord,
the giver of life, who proceeds from the
Father [and the Son].”
70
71. The words shown in brackets,
“and from the Son,” are a
Western addition to the Creed
71
72. Without going into too much detail, the
Eastern Church did not agree with this
choice of wording and the fact that the
West “slipped it in” drove further the
wedge between East and West
(Technically, the East had a legitimate complaint against how the Western Church
handled the situation, though they were wrong in their understanding of the doctrine)
72
73. “With the Father and the
Son he is worshipped and
glorified. He has spoken
through the Prophets.”
73
74. This line was directed against
the view that the Holy Spirit
did not exist, or was not
active, before Pentecost
74
75. “We believe in one holy
catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism
for the forgiveness of sins. We
look for the resurrection of
the dead, and the life of the
world to come. AMEN”
75
76. The “one baptism” part will
become important later
when St. Augustine battled
the Donatists...
76
77. Briefly, the Donatists
believed that if you
received an “illegitimate
baptism” then it didn’t count
and you needed to be
baptized again
77
78. Where do you hear this
heresy today? What is the
Biblical answer?
78
80. As with anything of this type, it
should be noted the kinds of
things that were left out of Creed,
because in doing so the framers
were essentially saying that
disagreements about such things
were not considered heretical
80
81. For example, many of the
“practical” teachings of Jesus
are missing entirely, especially
that which has to do with the
Kingdom of God and the
Kingdom of This World
81
82. Constantine, for one, would never
have allowed a Creed that spoke
against worldly ambitions
That omission would be used
when the Church started to gain
tremendous worldly power
82
Notes de l'éditeur
Greek.
It was the “universal language” of the time.
Genesis 1:31
Revelation 21
Sure sounds like John 3:1-21 …
Compare to their descriptions of “carnal” Christian vs. “born again” Christians…
Some of them distinguished between Christ, whom they acknowledged to be in some sense divine, and the man Jesus, who was at most an instrument through whom the Christ spoke
They held that the man Jesus did not become the bearer or instrument of the Christ until the Spirit descended upon him at his baptism, and that the Spirit left him before the crucifixion, so that the Spirit had only a brief and tenuous association with matter and humanity
Others affirmed that there was never a man Jesus at all, but only the appearance of a man, through which that appearance wise teachings were given to the first disciples
Against this the orthodox Christians affirmed that Jesus:
was conceived through the action of the Holy Spirit (denying the Gnostic position that the Spirit had nothing to do with Jesus until his Baptism)
that he was born (he had a real physical body, and not just an appearance)
…of a virgin (he had been special from the first moment of his life, and not just from the baptism on)
There were many stories then about gods who died and were resurrected, but they were offered as myths; as non-historical stories symbolic of things like the renewal of the vegetation every spring after the seeming death of winter
He was not an illusion. He was nailed to a cross. He died. He had a real body, a corpse, which was placed in a tomb
He was not merely unconscious – his spirit left his body and went to the realm of the dead
The orthodox belief was that the fullness of the Gospel was to be preached to the entire human race
This is very similar to a much older religion with considerable influence: Buddhism
Some of them, believing the body to be a snare and delusion, led lives of great asceticism (self-denial)
Others, believing the body to be quite separate from the soul, held that it did not matter what the body did, since it was completely foul anyway, and its actions had no effect on the soul
They accordingly led lives that were not “ascetic” at all
Either way, the notion of “forgiveness” was alien to them
Akin in this point to the Jewish Sadducees
God made Adam and Eve in bodies, and just because sin has corrupted the creation does not mean that “physicalness” itself is evil
Our glorified bodies will be given back to us
“Was the Arian heresy the denying of divinity of Jesus Christ? I think not at all: Jesus has divine origin, He is the Son of God, same substance but not coeternal.In other words, there was a time that Jesus was not, but the Father was, since the Father is eternal, no beginning no ending. Jesus may have no ending at all, but He had a beginning, since he is the beloved Son of God. The Arian heresy is the great claim against the tradition of the Trinity, which was never mentioned by Jesus, but by other non-Christian religions, with a great influence during the days of Jesus. (Much earlier Egyptians had their trinity too. So did the later cultures, up to the Romans themselves, with the Hellenic tradition.) There’s no Trinity. We must worship one God, the creator of all exiting things. Otherwise we may fall into paganism.” – from a post in a religious newsgroup
The root GEN is found in words like “genital, genetics, generation,” and suggests “begetting”
However, it is also found in words like “genus” and suggests “family” or “sort” or “kind”
Accordingly, we may take monogenetos to mean either “only begotten” or “one-of-a-kind, only, sole, unique”
It is possible to imagine that the sun has always existed, and always emitted light
The Light, then, is derived from the sun, but the Light and the sun exist simultaneously throughout eternity
They are co-eternal
In that same way the Son exists because the Father exists, but there was never a time before the Father “produced” the Son
(In those days, it was generally assumed that light was instantaneous, so that there was no delay at all between the time that a ray of light left the sun and the time it struck the earth)
Without it, they would have continued to teach that the Son is good, glorious, holy, a Mighty Power, God’s chief agent in creating the world, and the means by which God chiefly reveals Himself to us
Therefore deserving in some sense to be called “divine”
They would have continued to deny that the Son was God in the same sense in which the Father is God
Arius and his immediate followers would have denied that they were reducing the Son to the position of a high-ranking angel
When the more modern translation was done, they decided to insert the “death” clause just to make sure nobody forgot that it’s clear what happened
Rhetorical for now. :-) We’ll talk a lot more about it when discussing Augustine.