These are the slides I presented at the #SMSociety15 conference https://smsociety15.sched.org/event/84f2409561cd92c5cc1fc5b8b01558f9
While social media includes the applications that support the creation and exchange of user generated and participatory content (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010), the focus is commonly on the presentation or actions of users, the networks created on the platforms, and what we can do to promote our various WIIFMs (What’s In It For Me). It is less studied from the perspective of the networks themselves, especially through the influence and role of the non-human elements. Through this inverted perspective much may be learned, especially involving simple assumptions about the role of agency, namely the power to act (Latour, 2013). It is this social aspect of social media where actor-network theory can be most usefully employed, as the agency of things themselves may frequently be overlooked (Adams & Thompson, 2011) when rushing to understand the black box of assumptions present in social media research and practice.
Just What Is Social in Social Media? An Actor-Network Critique of Twitter Agency and Assumptions
1. Just What Is Social in Social Media?
An Actor-Network Critique
of Twitter Agency and Assumptions
Jeffrey M. Keefer
New York University & Pace University
Social Media & Society 2015 International Conference
July 27-29, 2015
Ted Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
8. It is this social aspect of social media where
actor-network theory can be usefully employed,
as the agency of things may frequently be
overlooked (Adams & Thompson, 2011).
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
9. In ANT, fixed realities
do not exist: multiple
actants (human and
nonhuman) constantly
interact in layers of
connections.
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
10. @JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
Resistance and negotiation lead to messy networks.
Even when things “resolve,” it only happens while
the actants maintain their stabilized relationships.
11. Nothing is permanent, even though we
frequently see various enactments of
repeated processes as stable . . .
. . . and as a result “black box” them and
assume they will always work in that way.
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
12. What assumptions do we black box with
social media research and practice?
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
13. This theoretical study explores a seven-part
framework (Kietzmann, Hermkens,
McCarthy, & Silvestre, 2011) of social media
—identity, conversations, sharing, presence,
relationships, reputation, and groups—
through the lens of actor-network theory
(ANT).
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
14. The honeycomb of social media
User
experience
Implications for
organizations
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
15. Actor-network theory focuses on
continuously generated networks, webs of
relations, where power can reside within
any actor—any person, place, or thing—that
continuously participates in the connections
(Callon, 1986; Latour, 2007; Law, 2008).
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
16. Let’s partner with the elements in social media
to better understand the “impacts of digital
engagements on processes of knowledge-
making and interacting” (Fenwick, 2014, p. 2)
and seek to answer the question:
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
Just what is
social in
social media?
17. Twitter, with its seeming simplicity, will be
the focus of this 7-part actor-network
inquiry—specifically the #SMSociety15 tag.
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
19. Next Steps:
1. Social Media studies often include
the elements, but not the complex
effects, of non-human actor agency.
2. Tags used vs. Tags as users?
3. How can we reconceive social when
non-human actors exert agency?
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15
20. Just What Is Social in Social Media?
An Actor-Network Critique
of Twitter Agency and Assumptions
Jeffrey M. Keefer
New York University & Pace University
Social Media & Society 2015 International Conference
July 27-29, 2015
Ted Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
@JeffreyKeefer #SMSociety15