SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Most people think of tests and exams that evaluate student learning as primary examples
of assessment, but those are examples of assessment of learning. Assessment for
learning, also known as classroom assessment, is different.

It is not used to evaluate learning but to help learners learn better. It does so by helping
both students and teachers to see:

   •   the learning goals and criteria
   •   where each learner is in relation to the goals
   •   where they need to go next
   •   and ways to get there

Many studies have been done over the years to gauge the effectiveness of assessment for
learning, and a review of this research in 1998 by Black and Wiliam found that
assessment for learning is one of the most powerful ways to improve learning, especially
among students who find learning to be more challenging.

This is exciting for educators!

By applying the principles and techniques of assessment for learning, we can help
students learn better now and achieve more in all areas of their educational experience.

In addition, assessment for learning is based upon an understanding of student motivation
and the psychology of learning, so students become better learners for the rest of their
lives as a result of their successful learning experiences.

Assessment for learning makes a difference for students, and from what we have seen, it
also results in a more satisfying and enjoyable experience for teachers. Educators become
more aware of how students learn and become more engaged with students in the
learning process, helping them to set goals and criteria, evaluate their progress, and
experience the many small "wins" that lead to them reaching their goals.

New classroom assessment techniques are developed so that teachers can be more
methodical and systematic in their teaching and see how these methods can be
successfully implemented in the classroom. One can almost believe that the classroom is
the new lab: the learning process is going to be dissected, analyzed, and improved, and
the final product implemented in a proper manner.

A good classroom assessment technique is important and will involve both the teacher
and the students. The student’s learning process is going to be monitored continuously.
The faculty is going to be provided with data and feedback that will show the progress of
the teacher as an effective instructor. The student will be given details about his progress
as a learner.

One of the reasons why classroom assessment techniques are quite popular with
instructors and teachers is because these techniques are created, analyzed, and then
implemented by the teachers themselves. The teachers look into different aspects of
learning as well as teaching, and look at the strong points and weak points in different
classroom assessment techniques. Once they have made up a “blueprint” for a new
experimental technique, they have the opportunity to incorporate it into their own
teaching system and program.

Many good classroom assessment techniques start with a bit of trial and error. The
students are observed closely during the learning process and given frequent
opportunities to offer feedback so that the teachers can get to know more about the
student response to some new and innovative teaching approaches. These techniques can
give the teacher a rough idea about how well, how much, and what their students are
learning. This information is very useful for getting faculty to re-focus and re-plan their
teaching methods so that the learning procedure can become more effective and
efficient.

Classroom assessment techniques are based on one major point: do not assume. A
teacher who thinks that his students are learning what has been taught to them might be
disappointed when the time comes to grade the papers. That is the reason why the
students and the teachers need to monitor the learning process. This means that the
students should participate in giving accurate feedback on new assessment techniques.

Assessment plan
The plan is designed to provide informationabout the extent towhich the University is
accomplishing its goals, particularlywith respect to studentoutcomes. When the plan
presented here is fullyimplemented, we believe that there will bea reasonable basis for
judgingthe extent to which the University is being successful indeveloping itsstudents.
The plan is an essential part of our reports to accreditingagencies,including the Middle
States Association of Colleges and Schools, as wellasvarious disciplinary or professional
associations. More importantly, the information generated should be useful to members
of the University community in improving programs designed to achieve student
outcomes.

Development and implementation of the University's assessment plan reflect the
following general guidelines which have emerged from discussions in the University's
Planning Committee, Assessment Committee, and Academic Policy Council. The
guidelines are not fixed rules but represent general dispositions regarding a variety of
assessment-related issues, particularly as those issues are being discussed in higher
education circles today.
1. The principal, although not exclusive, focus of attention for the assessment plan is
student outcomes. That is, the plan should help to answer the question: What happens to
our students as a result of their experiences at the University of Scranton?
Other University outcomes are of interest in the assessment plan, but only of secondary
interest at this time. Within the next several years, we expect to concentrate our attention
on those aspects of the assessment plan which relate most directly to student outcomes.
Some attention will be devoted to other University goals, even within the next several
years; and after elements of the assessment plan for student outcomes are well
established, additional attention will be devoted to the other goals.
2. Student outcomes should be broadly conceived to include both academic and non-
academic outcomes. Academic outcomes center mainly on the knowledge and skills
developed in the major field of study and on the intended outcomes of general education.
Non-academic outcomes include such matters as the development of character, moral
sensibilities, proclivities towards leadership and volunteer work, etc.
3. The University's mission statement should be a key document in determining what
student outcomes will be addressed. Further, the assessment plan itself should incorporate
mechanisms for continually monitoring the vitality and relevance of the mission
statement.
4. A modest plan is desired. The plan is not designed to "measure everything that moves."
The immediate goal is to have an identifiable but modest plan that provides meaningful
feedback to members of the University community. The plan is not are placement for
how instructors evaluate their students, although in some instances elements of the plan
may eventually supplement such evaluation. Experience suggests that elaborate, elegant
structures for assessment usually collapse from their own weight. Inaccord with our
desire for a modest plan, to the extent possible, existing mechanisms or processes will be
used for the collection and analysis of assessment information.
5. The plan should encourage individual units (departments, offices, etc.) within the
University to develop their own assessment activities. Again, experience suggests that the
most effective utilization of assessment information occurs when individual units have a
sense of ownership and participation in how results are used. We want to encourage that
sense of ownership and participation.
For purposes of reporting to external agencies, there is an unfortunate by-product of this
predisposition to decentralize assessment. External agencies often want to know precisely
what assessment is occurring and what effects it has had. To the extent that we are
successful in fostering a very widespread ownership of assessment, it becomes difficult to
answer the question of precisely what is taking place and precisely what its effects are.
We believe that it is worth contending with this difficulty in order to gain the advantages
associated with decentralization.
6. There should be an emphasis on utilization of assessment information for purposes of
improvement. To be sure, much of the information garnered from parts of the assessment
plan can be used in an accountability framework. However, we will, whenever possible,
attempt to aim our assessment efforts at improving the way we go about the University's
business, which is principally to educate students.
7. A major effort will be made to communicate results from the assessment plan to the
University community, again with an eye toward improvement. We do not want to collect
a lot of information which just sits on the shelf. We will try to resist the temptation to
collect more information when currently available information has not been digested or to
create entirely new assessment processes when the current processes need improvement.

Authentic assessment is an umbrella concept that refers to the measurement of
"intellectual accomplishments that are worthwhile, significant, and meaningful,"[1] as
compared to multiple choice standardized tests.[2] Authentic assessment can be devised by
the teacher, or in collaboration with the student by engaging student voice. When
applying authentic assessment to student learning and achievement, a teacher applies
criteria related to “construction of knowledge, disciplined inquiry, and the value of
achievement beyond the school.”

Authentic assessment reflects educational policy research that recommends a "high
priority on strategies that research has already shown to increase student learning."[citation
needed]



Authentic assessment tends to focus on complex or contextualised tasks, enabling
students to demonstrate their competency in a more 'authentic' setting. Examples of
authentic assessments include:

     •    performance of the skills, or demonstrating use of a particular knowledge
     •    simulations and role plays
     •    studio portfolios, strategically selecting items
     •    exhibitions and displays

Assessment is an ongoing process of setting high expectations for student learning,
measuring progress toward established learning outcomes, and providing a basis for
reflection, discussion and feedback to improve University academic
programs. It is a systematic and cyclic process that makes
expectations and standards explicit and public.

More Related Content

What's hot

Assessment in education problems causes policy frame
Assessment in education problems causes policy frameAssessment in education problems causes policy frame
Assessment in education problems causes policy frameSaimsaimon
 
Using assessment data for improving teaching practice acer conference 2009 ppt
Using assessment data for improving teaching practice acer conference 2009 pptUsing assessment data for improving teaching practice acer conference 2009 ppt
Using assessment data for improving teaching practice acer conference 2009 pptrobertsfiona
 
AHDS Conference 2014 - Workshop; TB: Tracking Progress and Achievement
AHDS Conference 2014 - Workshop; TB: Tracking Progress and AchievementAHDS Conference 2014 - Workshop; TB: Tracking Progress and Achievement
AHDS Conference 2014 - Workshop; TB: Tracking Progress and AchievementAHDScotland
 
Tb.session4.monitoring and tracking achievement
Tb.session4.monitoring and tracking achievementTb.session4.monitoring and tracking achievement
Tb.session4.monitoring and tracking achievementAHDScotland
 
Evaluating teacher performance fairly.presentation
Evaluating teacher performance fairly.presentationEvaluating teacher performance fairly.presentation
Evaluating teacher performance fairly.presentationOptimus Education
 
Leading Planning, Assessment and Moderation. All slides from Dunblane on 11 ...
Leading Planning, Assessment and Moderation.  All slides from Dunblane on 11 ...Leading Planning, Assessment and Moderation.  All slides from Dunblane on 11 ...
Leading Planning, Assessment and Moderation. All slides from Dunblane on 11 ...AHDScotland
 
Chapter 18 ppt eval & testing 4e formatted 01.10 kg edits
Chapter 18 ppt eval & testing 4e formatted 01.10 kg editsChapter 18 ppt eval & testing 4e formatted 01.10 kg edits
Chapter 18 ppt eval & testing 4e formatted 01.10 kg editsstanbridge
 
Continuous Assessment Component (CAC) of SEA
Continuous Assessment Component (CAC) of SEAContinuous Assessment Component (CAC) of SEA
Continuous Assessment Component (CAC) of SEAMoeEduTT
 
Teacher evaluation presentation oregon
Teacher evaluation presentation   oregonTeacher evaluation presentation   oregon
Teacher evaluation presentation oregonJohn Cronin
 
Educational Supervision and its types
Educational Supervision and its typesEducational Supervision and its types
Educational Supervision and its typesNeena Khala
 
Outcomes based education
Outcomes based educationOutcomes based education
Outcomes based educationanjpadro_xx
 
Faculty development why and how
Faculty development  why and howFaculty development  why and how
Faculty development why and howNamrata Chhabra
 
Guide Assessment4learning
Guide Assessment4learningGuide Assessment4learning
Guide Assessment4learningDai Barnes
 
Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...
Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...
Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...Tiffany Brooks
 
Assessment of Information Literacy Learning
Assessment of Information Literacy LearningAssessment of Information Literacy Learning
Assessment of Information Literacy LearningJohan Koren
 
Purpose of measurement and evaluation
Purpose of measurement and evaluationPurpose of measurement and evaluation
Purpose of measurement and evaluationRochelle Nato
 
Leading PAM.21 May 2013.Glasgow.all slides
Leading PAM.21 May 2013.Glasgow.all slidesLeading PAM.21 May 2013.Glasgow.all slides
Leading PAM.21 May 2013.Glasgow.all slidesAHDScotland
 
CQI through assessing LO
CQI through assessing LO  CQI through assessing LO
CQI through assessing LO SHAKINAZ DESA
 

What's hot (20)

Assessment in education problems causes policy frame
Assessment in education problems causes policy frameAssessment in education problems causes policy frame
Assessment in education problems causes policy frame
 
Using assessment data for improving teaching practice acer conference 2009 ppt
Using assessment data for improving teaching practice acer conference 2009 pptUsing assessment data for improving teaching practice acer conference 2009 ppt
Using assessment data for improving teaching practice acer conference 2009 ppt
 
AHDS Conference 2014 - Workshop; TB: Tracking Progress and Achievement
AHDS Conference 2014 - Workshop; TB: Tracking Progress and AchievementAHDS Conference 2014 - Workshop; TB: Tracking Progress and Achievement
AHDS Conference 2014 - Workshop; TB: Tracking Progress and Achievement
 
Tb.session4.monitoring and tracking achievement
Tb.session4.monitoring and tracking achievementTb.session4.monitoring and tracking achievement
Tb.session4.monitoring and tracking achievement
 
Evaluating teacher performance fairly.presentation
Evaluating teacher performance fairly.presentationEvaluating teacher performance fairly.presentation
Evaluating teacher performance fairly.presentation
 
Leading Planning, Assessment and Moderation. All slides from Dunblane on 11 ...
Leading Planning, Assessment and Moderation.  All slides from Dunblane on 11 ...Leading Planning, Assessment and Moderation.  All slides from Dunblane on 11 ...
Leading Planning, Assessment and Moderation. All slides from Dunblane on 11 ...
 
Chapter 18 ppt eval & testing 4e formatted 01.10 kg edits
Chapter 18 ppt eval & testing 4e formatted 01.10 kg editsChapter 18 ppt eval & testing 4e formatted 01.10 kg edits
Chapter 18 ppt eval & testing 4e formatted 01.10 kg edits
 
Continuous Assessment Component (CAC) of SEA
Continuous Assessment Component (CAC) of SEAContinuous Assessment Component (CAC) of SEA
Continuous Assessment Component (CAC) of SEA
 
Iao jan-2020
Iao jan-2020Iao jan-2020
Iao jan-2020
 
Teacher evaluation presentation oregon
Teacher evaluation presentation   oregonTeacher evaluation presentation   oregon
Teacher evaluation presentation oregon
 
Educational Supervision and its types
Educational Supervision and its typesEducational Supervision and its types
Educational Supervision and its types
 
Outcomes based education
Outcomes based educationOutcomes based education
Outcomes based education
 
Faculty development why and how
Faculty development  why and howFaculty development  why and how
Faculty development why and how
 
Guide Assessment4learning
Guide Assessment4learningGuide Assessment4learning
Guide Assessment4learning
 
Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...
Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...
Teacher Observations: The Case for Arts for All Public Charter School Policy ...
 
Assessment of Information Literacy Learning
Assessment of Information Literacy LearningAssessment of Information Literacy Learning
Assessment of Information Literacy Learning
 
VERSITIES_EYE_OPENER
VERSITIES_EYE_OPENERVERSITIES_EYE_OPENER
VERSITIES_EYE_OPENER
 
Purpose of measurement and evaluation
Purpose of measurement and evaluationPurpose of measurement and evaluation
Purpose of measurement and evaluation
 
Leading PAM.21 May 2013.Glasgow.all slides
Leading PAM.21 May 2013.Glasgow.all slidesLeading PAM.21 May 2013.Glasgow.all slides
Leading PAM.21 May 2013.Glasgow.all slides
 
CQI through assessing LO
CQI through assessing LO  CQI through assessing LO
CQI through assessing LO
 

Viewers also liked

12a my personal philosophy of education
12a my personal philosophy of education12a my personal philosophy of education
12a my personal philosophy of educationjennilynbalbalosa
 
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studies
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studiesChapter 2:review of related literature and studies
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studiesmhel15
 
Related Literature and Related Studies
Related Literature and Related StudiesRelated Literature and Related Studies
Related Literature and Related StudiesJenny Reyes
 
Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)
Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)
Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)Dilip Barad
 
Chapter 2-Realated literature and Studies
Chapter 2-Realated literature and StudiesChapter 2-Realated literature and Studies
Chapter 2-Realated literature and StudiesMercy Daracan
 
Review of related literature and studies
Review of related literature and studiesReview of related literature and studies
Review of related literature and studiesbantigui
 
Review of Related Literature-Thesis Guide
Review of Related Literature-Thesis GuideReview of Related Literature-Thesis Guide
Review of Related Literature-Thesis GuideRachel Khan
 
The thesis and its parts
The thesis and its partsThe thesis and its parts
The thesis and its partsDraizelle Sexon
 

Viewers also liked (12)

Jen Chapter2
Jen Chapter2Jen Chapter2
Jen Chapter2
 
12a my personal philosophy of education
12a my personal philosophy of education12a my personal philosophy of education
12a my personal philosophy of education
 
Chapters 1 5
Chapters 1 5Chapters 1 5
Chapters 1 5
 
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studies
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studiesChapter 2:review of related literature and studies
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studies
 
Related Literature and Related Studies
Related Literature and Related StudiesRelated Literature and Related Studies
Related Literature and Related Studies
 
Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)
Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)
Literature Review (Review of Related Literature - Research Methodology)
 
Chapter 2-Realated literature and Studies
Chapter 2-Realated literature and StudiesChapter 2-Realated literature and Studies
Chapter 2-Realated literature and Studies
 
Review of related literature and studies
Review of related literature and studiesReview of related literature and studies
Review of related literature and studies
 
Final na final thesis
Final na final thesisFinal na final thesis
Final na final thesis
 
Review of Related Literature-Thesis Guide
Review of Related Literature-Thesis GuideReview of Related Literature-Thesis Guide
Review of Related Literature-Thesis Guide
 
The thesis and its parts
The thesis and its partsThe thesis and its parts
The thesis and its parts
 
Chapter 2
Chapter 2Chapter 2
Chapter 2
 

Similar to Fs

Test Development and Evaluation
Test Development and Evaluation Test Development and Evaluation
Test Development and Evaluation HennaAnsari
 
Using assessment to support the curriculum
Using assessment to support the curriculumUsing assessment to support the curriculum
Using assessment to support the curriculumrommiel
 
Chapter 8 reporting by group 6 (autosaved) (autosaved)
Chapter 8 reporting by group 6 (autosaved) (autosaved)Chapter 8 reporting by group 6 (autosaved) (autosaved)
Chapter 8 reporting by group 6 (autosaved) (autosaved)Christine Watts
 
UNIT 6 CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION NOTES (1).pptx
UNIT 6 CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION NOTES (1).pptxUNIT 6 CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION NOTES (1).pptx
UNIT 6 CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION NOTES (1).pptxElieser Sheya
 
teaching material
teaching material teaching material
teaching material Kadek Astiti
 
DISCUSSION ISSUES ON ASSESSMENT
DISCUSSION ISSUES ON ASSESSMENTDISCUSSION ISSUES ON ASSESSMENT
DISCUSSION ISSUES ON ASSESSMENTFatin Amira
 
Module 2 Application
Module 2 ApplicationModule 2 Application
Module 2 ApplicationAlba Ortega
 
PILOT TESTING, MONITORING and EVALUATING the IMPLEMENTATION of the CURRICULUM
PILOT TESTING, MONITORING and EVALUATING the  IMPLEMENTATION of the CURRICULUMPILOT TESTING, MONITORING and EVALUATING the  IMPLEMENTATION of the CURRICULUM
PILOT TESTING, MONITORING and EVALUATING the IMPLEMENTATION of the CURRICULUMAlbin Caibog
 
De guzman, adrienne(assessment) (1)
De guzman, adrienne(assessment)  (1)De guzman, adrienne(assessment)  (1)
De guzman, adrienne(assessment) (1)Jeff Andrada
 
Formative Assessment as an Essential Competence of University Teachers
Formative Assessment as an Essential Competence of University TeachersFormative Assessment as an Essential Competence of University Teachers
Formative Assessment as an Essential Competence of University Teachersiosrjce
 

Similar to Fs (20)

Fs2
Fs2Fs2
Fs2
 
Essay On Assessment For Learning
Essay On Assessment For LearningEssay On Assessment For Learning
Essay On Assessment For Learning
 
Test Development and Evaluation
Test Development and Evaluation Test Development and Evaluation
Test Development and Evaluation
 
Using assessment to support the curriculum
Using assessment to support the curriculumUsing assessment to support the curriculum
Using assessment to support the curriculum
 
Module4
Module4Module4
Module4
 
Chapter 8 reporting by group 6 (autosaved) (autosaved)
Chapter 8 reporting by group 6 (autosaved) (autosaved)Chapter 8 reporting by group 6 (autosaved) (autosaved)
Chapter 8 reporting by group 6 (autosaved) (autosaved)
 
UNIT 6 CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION NOTES (1).pptx
UNIT 6 CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION NOTES (1).pptxUNIT 6 CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION NOTES (1).pptx
UNIT 6 CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION NOTES (1).pptx
 
Curriculum Evaluation
Curriculum EvaluationCurriculum Evaluation
Curriculum Evaluation
 
teaching material
teaching material teaching material
teaching material
 
unit- 8.pdf
unit- 8.pdfunit- 8.pdf
unit- 8.pdf
 
Comparing Formative And Summative Evaluations
Comparing Formative And Summative EvaluationsComparing Formative And Summative Evaluations
Comparing Formative And Summative Evaluations
 
Essay About Summative Assessment Preparation
Essay About Summative Assessment PreparationEssay About Summative Assessment Preparation
Essay About Summative Assessment Preparation
 
Types Of Assessment
Types Of AssessmentTypes Of Assessment
Types Of Assessment
 
DISCUSSION ISSUES ON ASSESSMENT
DISCUSSION ISSUES ON ASSESSMENTDISCUSSION ISSUES ON ASSESSMENT
DISCUSSION ISSUES ON ASSESSMENT
 
Module 2 Application
Module 2 ApplicationModule 2 Application
Module 2 Application
 
PILOT TESTING, MONITORING and EVALUATING the IMPLEMENTATION of the CURRICULUM
PILOT TESTING, MONITORING and EVALUATING the  IMPLEMENTATION of the CURRICULUMPILOT TESTING, MONITORING and EVALUATING the  IMPLEMENTATION of the CURRICULUM
PILOT TESTING, MONITORING and EVALUATING the IMPLEMENTATION of the CURRICULUM
 
De guzman, adrienne(assessment) (1)
De guzman, adrienne(assessment)  (1)De guzman, adrienne(assessment)  (1)
De guzman, adrienne(assessment) (1)
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Formative Assessment as an Essential Competence of University Teachers
Formative Assessment as an Essential Competence of University TeachersFormative Assessment as an Essential Competence of University Teachers
Formative Assessment as an Essential Competence of University Teachers
 
Pros and cons of school based assessment in india by dr. thanuja.k converted
Pros and cons of school based assessment in india by dr. thanuja.k convertedPros and cons of school based assessment in india by dr. thanuja.k converted
Pros and cons of school based assessment in india by dr. thanuja.k converted
 

More from jennilynbalbalosa (20)

Approval sheet
Approval sheetApproval sheet
Approval sheet
 
Application letter document
Application letter documentApplication letter document
Application letter document
 
6history lspu
6history lspu6history lspu
6history lspu
 
Detailed lesson plan in elementary algebra
Detailed lesson plan in elementary algebraDetailed lesson plan in elementary algebra
Detailed lesson plan in elementary algebra
 
Acknowledgement jen
Acknowledgement jenAcknowledgement jen
Acknowledgement jen
 
Acknowledgement jen
Acknowledgement jenAcknowledgement jen
Acknowledgement jen
 
October4,2010 jen thesis
October4,2010 jen thesisOctober4,2010 jen thesis
October4,2010 jen thesis
 
Approval sheet
Approval sheetApproval sheet
Approval sheet
 
Abstract edit
Abstract editAbstract edit
Abstract edit
 
To be edit acknowledgement
To be edit acknowledgementTo be edit acknowledgement
To be edit acknowledgement
 
Finalbibliography edit
Finalbibliography editFinalbibliography edit
Finalbibliography edit
 
Final chapter2 edit
Final chapter2 editFinal chapter2 edit
Final chapter2 edit
 
Poisson distribution jen
Poisson distribution jenPoisson distribution jen
Poisson distribution jen
 
Parabola jen
Parabola jenParabola jen
Parabola jen
 
Final bibliography
Final bibliographyFinal bibliography
Final bibliography
 
Chapter2 2
Chapter2 2Chapter2 2
Chapter2 2
 
Resume1
Resume1Resume1
Resume1
 
Final thesis-jen
Final thesis-jenFinal thesis-jen
Final thesis-jen
 
Bibliography
BibliographyBibliography
Bibliography
 
Abstract
AbstractAbstract
Abstract
 

Fs

  • 1. Most people think of tests and exams that evaluate student learning as primary examples of assessment, but those are examples of assessment of learning. Assessment for learning, also known as classroom assessment, is different. It is not used to evaluate learning but to help learners learn better. It does so by helping both students and teachers to see: • the learning goals and criteria • where each learner is in relation to the goals • where they need to go next • and ways to get there Many studies have been done over the years to gauge the effectiveness of assessment for learning, and a review of this research in 1998 by Black and Wiliam found that assessment for learning is one of the most powerful ways to improve learning, especially among students who find learning to be more challenging. This is exciting for educators! By applying the principles and techniques of assessment for learning, we can help students learn better now and achieve more in all areas of their educational experience. In addition, assessment for learning is based upon an understanding of student motivation and the psychology of learning, so students become better learners for the rest of their lives as a result of their successful learning experiences. Assessment for learning makes a difference for students, and from what we have seen, it also results in a more satisfying and enjoyable experience for teachers. Educators become more aware of how students learn and become more engaged with students in the learning process, helping them to set goals and criteria, evaluate their progress, and experience the many small "wins" that lead to them reaching their goals. New classroom assessment techniques are developed so that teachers can be more methodical and systematic in their teaching and see how these methods can be successfully implemented in the classroom. One can almost believe that the classroom is the new lab: the learning process is going to be dissected, analyzed, and improved, and the final product implemented in a proper manner. A good classroom assessment technique is important and will involve both the teacher and the students. The student’s learning process is going to be monitored continuously. The faculty is going to be provided with data and feedback that will show the progress of the teacher as an effective instructor. The student will be given details about his progress as a learner. One of the reasons why classroom assessment techniques are quite popular with instructors and teachers is because these techniques are created, analyzed, and then
  • 2. implemented by the teachers themselves. The teachers look into different aspects of learning as well as teaching, and look at the strong points and weak points in different classroom assessment techniques. Once they have made up a “blueprint” for a new experimental technique, they have the opportunity to incorporate it into their own teaching system and program. Many good classroom assessment techniques start with a bit of trial and error. The students are observed closely during the learning process and given frequent opportunities to offer feedback so that the teachers can get to know more about the student response to some new and innovative teaching approaches. These techniques can give the teacher a rough idea about how well, how much, and what their students are learning. This information is very useful for getting faculty to re-focus and re-plan their teaching methods so that the learning procedure can become more effective and efficient. Classroom assessment techniques are based on one major point: do not assume. A teacher who thinks that his students are learning what has been taught to them might be disappointed when the time comes to grade the papers. That is the reason why the students and the teachers need to monitor the learning process. This means that the students should participate in giving accurate feedback on new assessment techniques. Assessment plan The plan is designed to provide informationabout the extent towhich the University is accomplishing its goals, particularlywith respect to studentoutcomes. When the plan presented here is fullyimplemented, we believe that there will bea reasonable basis for judgingthe extent to which the University is being successful indeveloping itsstudents. The plan is an essential part of our reports to accreditingagencies,including the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools, as wellasvarious disciplinary or professional associations. More importantly, the information generated should be useful to members of the University community in improving programs designed to achieve student outcomes. Development and implementation of the University's assessment plan reflect the following general guidelines which have emerged from discussions in the University's Planning Committee, Assessment Committee, and Academic Policy Council. The guidelines are not fixed rules but represent general dispositions regarding a variety of assessment-related issues, particularly as those issues are being discussed in higher education circles today. 1. The principal, although not exclusive, focus of attention for the assessment plan is student outcomes. That is, the plan should help to answer the question: What happens to our students as a result of their experiences at the University of Scranton? Other University outcomes are of interest in the assessment plan, but only of secondary interest at this time. Within the next several years, we expect to concentrate our attention on those aspects of the assessment plan which relate most directly to student outcomes. Some attention will be devoted to other University goals, even within the next several years; and after elements of the assessment plan for student outcomes are well
  • 3. established, additional attention will be devoted to the other goals. 2. Student outcomes should be broadly conceived to include both academic and non- academic outcomes. Academic outcomes center mainly on the knowledge and skills developed in the major field of study and on the intended outcomes of general education. Non-academic outcomes include such matters as the development of character, moral sensibilities, proclivities towards leadership and volunteer work, etc. 3. The University's mission statement should be a key document in determining what student outcomes will be addressed. Further, the assessment plan itself should incorporate mechanisms for continually monitoring the vitality and relevance of the mission statement. 4. A modest plan is desired. The plan is not designed to "measure everything that moves." The immediate goal is to have an identifiable but modest plan that provides meaningful feedback to members of the University community. The plan is not are placement for how instructors evaluate their students, although in some instances elements of the plan may eventually supplement such evaluation. Experience suggests that elaborate, elegant structures for assessment usually collapse from their own weight. Inaccord with our desire for a modest plan, to the extent possible, existing mechanisms or processes will be used for the collection and analysis of assessment information. 5. The plan should encourage individual units (departments, offices, etc.) within the University to develop their own assessment activities. Again, experience suggests that the most effective utilization of assessment information occurs when individual units have a sense of ownership and participation in how results are used. We want to encourage that sense of ownership and participation. For purposes of reporting to external agencies, there is an unfortunate by-product of this predisposition to decentralize assessment. External agencies often want to know precisely what assessment is occurring and what effects it has had. To the extent that we are successful in fostering a very widespread ownership of assessment, it becomes difficult to answer the question of precisely what is taking place and precisely what its effects are. We believe that it is worth contending with this difficulty in order to gain the advantages associated with decentralization. 6. There should be an emphasis on utilization of assessment information for purposes of improvement. To be sure, much of the information garnered from parts of the assessment plan can be used in an accountability framework. However, we will, whenever possible, attempt to aim our assessment efforts at improving the way we go about the University's business, which is principally to educate students. 7. A major effort will be made to communicate results from the assessment plan to the University community, again with an eye toward improvement. We do not want to collect a lot of information which just sits on the shelf. We will try to resist the temptation to collect more information when currently available information has not been digested or to create entirely new assessment processes when the current processes need improvement. Authentic assessment is an umbrella concept that refers to the measurement of "intellectual accomplishments that are worthwhile, significant, and meaningful,"[1] as compared to multiple choice standardized tests.[2] Authentic assessment can be devised by the teacher, or in collaboration with the student by engaging student voice. When applying authentic assessment to student learning and achievement, a teacher applies
  • 4. criteria related to “construction of knowledge, disciplined inquiry, and the value of achievement beyond the school.” Authentic assessment reflects educational policy research that recommends a "high priority on strategies that research has already shown to increase student learning."[citation needed] Authentic assessment tends to focus on complex or contextualised tasks, enabling students to demonstrate their competency in a more 'authentic' setting. Examples of authentic assessments include: • performance of the skills, or demonstrating use of a particular knowledge • simulations and role plays • studio portfolios, strategically selecting items • exhibitions and displays Assessment is an ongoing process of setting high expectations for student learning, measuring progress toward established learning outcomes, and providing a basis for reflection, discussion and feedback to improve University academic programs. It is a systematic and cyclic process that makes expectations and standards explicit and public.