1. Rev Jobin JohnRev Jobin John
DirectorDirector
Nairmalya Coumselling & de addiction centre Peyad TVM 573Nairmalya Coumselling & de addiction centre Peyad TVM 573
+91-9496847734+91-9496847734
2.
3. INTRODUCTION:
Substance abuse often been described as “Family
Disease”
Apparent Genetic Predispositions
Environmental (Family)context within which an
individual is raised
4. HISTORY OF INVOLVING FAMILIES IN THE
TREATMENT OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
1960 - Professionals began to consider families of
alcohol dependents in the treatment.
1966 - Treatment centre in Minnesota hired a social
worker to deal with families of PWADS
1970 – Family is seen as pathology(relapse due to
EE)
5. Contd….
1980 – Family as carer
1985 - Family therapist began to acknowledge the
need for development of clinical approach to work
with alcohol affected families.
1990 - Family as partners in treatment
6. Characteristic of Families with
Substance Abuse
High degree of chaos, conflict, unpredictability and
inconsistent messages to children about their worth
Breakdown of traditional rituals & rules, less cohesive
Poor communication/ strained IPR
Inadequate or multiple role functioning
8. Family therapy views the family as a whole, rather
than the individual as a basic unit of pathology
It focuses on the dysfunctional system of interacting
personalities, the communication patterns of
individual members of the family, and how it
contributes in maintaining alcohol abuse in the
member.
9. Why include family?
Rich resource for the recovery of addicts
Aspects of family functioning and interaction patterns -
associated with Rx duration, abstinence
Families demonstrating low expressed emotion as indicated
by warmth, an appropriate level of involvement, and less
criticism. Less likely to relapse than those from families of high
expressed emotion (O’Farrell, Fals-Stewart 1998).
Family member can positively impact the substance user
10. Contd….
Interaction and consequent social reinforcement
from within the family environment may often
influence alcohol related behaviors
Play a significant role in reinforcing the adaptive
behaviors.
11. Contd….
Delay relapse and
Fewer drinking days
Family involvement in treatment is not only
beneficial for the individual but also the negative
impact of the addictive behavior on family members
can be reduced.
One traditional method that incorporates the family
is Al-Anon, a self-help approach
13. Approaches to FT in S Abuse:
Family Disease Model,
Family Systems Theory, and
Behavioural Family Theory
14. Family Disease Model
Proposes that both the problem drinker and
his or her family members have a disease
Progressive disease, and family members of
the alcoholic are thought to suffer from
codependency
15. Family Disease Model
Alcoholics and co-dependents are treated
separately,
Wherein family members receive education
about alcoholism and co-dependency, as well
as individual or group therapy to improve their
own psychological wellbeing
(Mc Crady, 1989).
16. Family Systems Theory
Symptom of the family’s dysfunction
(Stanton et al., 1982).
Presence or absence of alcohol or drugs becomes
the
defining factor in family interactions.
Family members adapt to the substance use
behavior
they also serve to help maintain the substance use
Individual behaviours occur not in isolation but in
the context of the system in which the individuals
find themselves
17. Behavioural family theory
Suggest that substance abusers from happy families
with good communication are less likely to relapse.
Goals: To reinforce positive interactions among
family members and decrease negative behaviours or
interactions associated with drinking
Family members learn communication skills and
techniques to reward the drinkers’ sobriety.
18. Goals of Family Intervention:
To reduce or eliminate abusive
drinking and support the alcoholic’s
effort to change.
Persuade the family to change alcohol
related interaction patterns (e.g.
nagging about past drinking but
ignoring current sober behavior)
19. Goals:
Help the couple to repair the extensive relationship
damage they incurred during many years of conflict
over substance used.
Help the abstinent substance user and their spouse
to engage in behaviors which are more pleasing to
each other
Help them to find solutions to relationship
difficulties that may not be directly related to the
substances used.
20. Case work for Families (CWF)
Four goals:
(a) Facilitate and maintain abstinence,
(b) Promote work and economic independence,
(c) Address safety from violence for women and
children, and
(d) Improve family functioning
21. Interventions:
Customized or tailored to the individual needs of the client
CWF should provide services in eight areas:
Substance abuse,
Employment
Mental health,
Physical health,
Parenting,
Family relationships,
Domestic violence, and
Basic needs (housing, transportation, and child care).
.
22. Training should be integrated into treatment
Empathic treatment approach, gender specific
Should incorporate interventions at the level of the
organization to foster effective collaboration through
changing organizational culture and capacity building
25. Role of Spouse/family Members
Do not suspect
Develop trust
Do not discuss the individual's previous drinking
problems and consequences with others
Eliminate the stimulus cues from the home
Reinforce the dry habit
26. Contd…
Provide +ve feedback
Provide alternative activities
Deal with interpersonal problems
Improve communication and avoid criticism
at home
Alert friends
27. Contd…
Identify potential risk factors for
relapse: meeting with specific situations,
stressors at home or at work situation, crisis and
conflicts, and certain emotional states may trigger
a relapse.
Identify the behavior that may indicate a
potential relapse: restlessness, boredom, frequent
spells of anger, frequent returning home late,
spending large sums of money
29. Common warning signs of relapse,
importance of relapse prevention,
how the family can be involved, and
how to deal with an actual lapse or relapse of an
addicted family member.
31. Advantage of FI
learn about strategies to take care of themselves so
that all the recovery efforts are not simply directed at
the addicted person.
learn about better coping strategies
behaviors that they should avoid, which are
considered enabling
Referrals for family members with a psychiatric
disorder
32. lessen the burden
offers the client the opportunity to receive support
from the family.
to verbalize their concerns, questions, experiences,
and feelings related to the addicted family member.
Can be a motivating factor
To maintain recovery
33. Advantage of FI
Inspiring motivation to change
Preparing clients to enter treatment.
Engaging and retaining clients in treatment.
Increasing participation and involvement.
Improving treatment outcomes.
Encouraging a rapid return to treatment if symptoms
recur
34. Problems & Challenged Faced
LT substance use-neglect of fly roles-shame & guilt
with children-marital therapy not fly therapy
Marital commitment-contemplating separation-poorly
motivated-needs individual session
Consent refuse by spouse parents
Having extramarital affairs , or more than 1 wife
35. Problems & Challenged Faced
Joint fly-more than 1 substance using individual
Severe fly pathology involving marital/domestic
violence , child sexual abuse , ‘fly secrets’ n decline
the therapy
Adult children of Alcoholics resistant-anger n
hostility towards them
36. Problems & Challenged Faced
Challenging with consanguineous marriage-elders in
family
Joint family-protect patient and make a scapegoat of
the spouse
Women substance users are greatly stigmatized n
poor social support.
37. Research study
Studies of Family involvement in treatment alcohol and
drug dependent show that
Increased abstinence,
happier relationships and
fewer separations than individual-based treatment,
substantial reduction in domestic violence,
better outcome in both alcohol and drug abuse and
superior to individual based treatment,
children helped more than individual-based treatment
for both alcohol and drug abuse.
(Azrin, Sisson, Kelley & Fals-Stewart, 2002; McCrady,(Fals-Stewart,
Birchler & O'Farrell, 1996).
38. Ashok Kumar & Nirmala (2008) in their study
on “social support among abstinence and non-
abstinence alcohol dependents’ found that
those who were maintaining abstinence for
more than 2 yrs;
had strong family social support, self
motivation;
were regular for treatment and follow up
39. Scales for Family Assessment:
Marital Quality Scale, Shah, 1995 NIMHANS
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Spanier (1976)
The Family environment scale: Moos and Moos
Family Interaction Pattern Bhatti et al 1986
The conflict Tactics Scale: Strauss 1979
Parenting Bonding Scale: Parker, Tupling, Brown
Children of Alcoholics Screening Test; Pilat and Jones