The document summarizes FCAT reading data from Smith Middle School from 2011-2013 and outlines plans to improve reading performance. It shows that 6th and 9th grade reading scores increased significantly from 2012-2013, exceeding district and state averages. The school aims to decrease the number of low-performing students and increase the number of proficient readers over the next year through reading interventions, data analysis, and professional development for teachers.

1. Smith Middle School
PTA: 2012-2013 FCAT Reading Data
Report
Special thanks to our
donors, teachers, staff, pare
nts, and students

2. Vision Statement
The vision of Smith Middle School is to prevent
juvenile delinquency and develop
lawful, productive citizens through a broad
range of family-centered services. The mission of
the Smith Middle School is to educate and
prepare our students for a successful future. We
provide a safe, structured environment where at
risk students can reach their full potential. We
teach the foundations of respect, cooperation
and place a high value on core curriculum
achievement.

3. Florida's Common Core State Standards (CCSS) implementation
Plan
Common Core State Standards Implementation Plan Diagram
Retrieved from
http://www.cpalms.org/Standards/Common_Core_Standards.aspx

4. FCAT 2.0 Reading Developmental Scale
Scores (140 to 302)
http://fcat.fldoe.org/fcat2/pdf/2012-
13FactSheet20.pdf
Grade Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
6 167-206 207-221 222-236 237-251 252-283
7 171-212 213-227 228-242 243-257 258-289
8 175-217 218-234 235-248 249-263 264-296
9 178-221 222-239 240-252 253-267 268-302
10 188-227 228-244 245-255 256-270 271-302

5. 2011-2013 FCAT Reading
Report
0
50
100
150
200
250
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10
FCATReadingMeanDSS
Grade Level
2011
2012
2013

6. 2011-2013 Smith School FCAT
Reading Results
 6th grade: steady improvement over 3
year period
 7th grade: decrease in mean DSS from
2012 to 2013
 8th: slight decline in DSS from 2012 to 2013
 9th grade: over 20 point mean DSS gains
from 2012 to 2013
 10th: over 10 points overall mean DSS from
2012 to 2013

7. Learning Goals
 Decrease percentage of level 1 readers in
6-10 by 5%
 Increase percentage of proficient
students (L3 or higher) in 6-10 by 5%
 75% of 6-10 students make annual
learning gains in reading

8. 0
50
100
150
200
250
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10
FCATReadingMeanDSS
Grade Level
2011 FCAT Reading Comparison to Suwannee
District and State
Cooke School
District
State

9. 2011FCAT Reading
Comparison to District/State
 Smith Middle scored well below the
district and state in grades 6-12
 8th grade scored the highest
comparatively with a mean DSS of nearly
210
 6th,7th, & 9th graders scored just above
200
 10th graders scored nearly 45 mean DSS
points below the district

10. 195
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10
FCATreadingMeanDSS
Grade Level
2012 FCAT Reading Comparison to
Suwannee District and State
Cooke School
District
State

11. 2012 FCAT Reading
Comparison to District/State
 6th scored slightly higher, but district &
state mean DSS saw increases
 7th,8th,&9th increased from 2011, but district
& state mean DSS increased over 10
points
 10th grade students scores increased over
20 points, but remains nearly 20 points
below district & state averages

12. 190
200
210
220
230
240
250
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10
FCATReadingMeanDSS
Grade Level
2013 FCAT Reading Comparison to Suwannee
District and State
Cooke School
District
State

13. 2013 FCAT Reading
Comparison to District/State
 6th graders improved a dramatic 16 points
from 2012/ 8 points above the district/3
above the state
 9th graders also had drastic increases
scoring a mean DSS of 250/14 points
above the district/10 above the state
average
 10th graders drew to within 3 points of the
districts mean DSS of 242

14. Reading Interventions to
Improve Performance
 7th & 8th graders level 1 or 2, Intensive
Reading class or Content Area Intensive
Reading course
 CIS strategy with Marzano’s nine high
yield Instructional Strategies
 Implement Read 180 for grade level
specific reading instruction
 Tutoring by remedial reading teacher

15. Increasing Achievement and
Proficiency
 Professional Development for
Comprehensive Instructional Sequence
Training
 Data Chats by Reading Teams to assess
baseline, mid-year, and end of year
assessments to progress monitor
 Teacher supported credit retrieval
software for High School students

16. Additional Supports
 Gate-MacGuinitie Reading Test
administered for students that do not
have an FCAT score
 After school tutoring programs for ESOL
students
 Lesson plans focus on increasing the use
of complex text for content area
 SIRP/CIRP/CIS Implementation

17. Staff Recognition
 Reading Instructors Mrs. Campbell and
Mrs. Parker for many years of excellent
service and credentials
 Mrs. Campbell has a masters
degree/Reading endorsement/ESOL
endorsement
 Mrs. Parker has a masters
degree/Reading endorsement
 All our committed teachers and staff

18. Student Recognition for
Academic Achievement
 6th grade class for scoring above the
district and state in reading for 2013
 9th grade class for scoring significantly
higher than district & state averages in
reading for 2013
 10th grade class for a reading gain of 17
mean DSS points from 2012 to 2013
 Congratulations Parents/Students/Staff

19. 190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10
FCATReadingMeanDSS
Grade Level
FCAT Reading 2013-2014 Projection
2013
2014 Target