1. Energy Management Tool for BuildingsVisualizing a Green Tomorrow IST220 : REDteam Josh Wentz, Kim Klinikowski, Christopher Alvarado, Marco DeLeonardis, Brendan Jann, & Jon Vettori December 2, 2009 NETWORK BASED SOLUTION Semester Project

2. REDteam 2 REDteam

3. table of contents REDteam 3

4. introduction Christopher Alvarado & Brendan Jann 4 REDteam

5. introducing the problem Society today focuses on conservation of the environment Focus has mainly been on motor vehicles, human pollution, industrial waste, etc. Cities produce mass amounts of greenhouse emissions as well BUT not the people or power-plants... The buildings themselves produce 41% of the dangerous greenhouse gasses in the U.S. They also consume 71% of electricity produced 5 [Energy Information Administration, U.S. Dept. of Energy, 2008] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

6. introducing the problem Buildings today lack the ability to integrate information between energy demanding systems Results in an inefficient use of energy Added energy use creates added greenhouse gasses Not eco-friendly or cost-effective Technology today can enable us to successfully monitor all energy consumption to ensure maximum efficiency Seamlessly integrate important energy consumption information "Energy Management Tool for Buildings" 6 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

7. problem analysis Marco DeLeonardis 7 REDteam

8. problems Various systems within a building currently perform disconnected tasks instead of one holistic process Buildings are the top contributors of greenhouse gas emissions affecting climate change The general public is unaware of the massive amounts of energy that buildings consume daily INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION 8

9. 1: disconnected systems Various systems within a building today are performing disconnected tasks rather than working together to achieve an efficient holistic process CONNECTIVITY INTEGRATION INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION 9

10. 1: disconnected systems 10 [Kevin Powell, GSA, 2009] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

11. 1: disconnected systems Tasks are not performing as one, thus creating inefficiencies Lights, heating , and cooling systems, computer and other electronics all contribute There is a lack of building information available to monitor this consumption DISPARATE CONTROLS & PROTOCOLS [http://www.atlas-solar.com/grid.asp] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION 11

12. 2: building pollution FACT: Buildings are the top contributor of greenhouse gas emissions affecting climate change [Energy Information Administration, U.S. Dept. of Energy, 2008] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION 12

13. 3: public awareness The public is unaware of how much energy they are consuming daily This includes both business and domestic energy usage “Only 7% of American voters identified buildings as the top contributor of greenhouse gas emissions.” -Recent poll by American Institute of Architects [http://www.aia.org/press/AIAS077318] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION 13

15. network based solution analysis Josh Wentz 15 REDteam

16. conceptual solution Network Infrastructure Mediator Protocol Translator User End software 16 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

17. 1: network infrastructure Transform power infrastructure into a networking infrastructure UNDERLYING TECHNOLOGY: Packet switching, wi-fi, processors, sensors Most existing metering devices do not have a NIC to connect a new wireless device to the network Most buildings are not using new methods of transmitting information = wireless 17 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

18. 1: network infrastructure 18 [http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080730/images/454570a-6.jpg] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

19. 2: mediator protocol translator Create a mediator (like a router in the IT world) that will translate all building protocols into one UNDERLYING TECHNOLOGY: IP Protocol, multiplexing (share single transmission media), LAN Most metering devices today all use proprietary protocol Will allow information to be comparable 19 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

20. 2: mediator protocol translator 20 CISCO MEDIATOR [Ed Richards, Cisco, 2009] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

21. 2: mediator protocol translator 21 TRANSLATES ALL PROPRIETARY BUILDING PROTOCOLS [Alexis Ringwald, Valence Energy, 2009] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

22. 2: mediator protocol translator 22 INTEGRATED BUILDING SYSTEMS [Kevin Powell, GSA, 2009] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

23. 3: user end software Develop a user end software to view the database of building information UNDERLYING TECHNOLOGY: Software, databases, servers Will allow users to view where in their building they're spending energy costs 23 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

24. 3: user end software 24 DYNAMIC REAL-TIME ENERGY CHARTING [Engineered Systems, 2009] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

25. 3: user end software 25 [Alexis Ringwald, Valence Energy, 2009] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

26. implementation analysis IMPLEMENTATION #1 wired, mediator, cloud computing software/ database IMPLEMENTATION #2 wireless, mediator, local software/ database IMPLEMENTATION #3 wireless, mediator, cloud computing software/ database 26 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

27. best implementation among alternatives IMPLEMENTATION #3: 1 – wireless, 2 - mediator, 3- cloud computing software/ database STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Replacing current wired & installation methods with wireless will save hundreds of thousands of dollars on replacing wire material r with wireless Resources can now be shared Accessibility Transmission errors Partnership between utilities & industrial & commercial companies needs to be created Security of energy information over the internet 27 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

28. impact & risk analysis Kim Klinikowski 28 REDteam

29. impact & risk analysis Vulnerabilities of the Internet Unwillingness to collaborate Lack of qualified personnel Software incapability's Transmission interference 29 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

30. 1: vulnerabilities of the internet 30 RISK: Transmission media imposes vulnerabilities on confidential data High probability of occurrence with a medium impact on overall project MITIGATION: Encompasses a variety of strategies Security training session with company employees Public key encryption system Consider cost of cryptographer ($95,000/year) Use of proxy servers Inexpensive but could save hundreds to thousands Use of firewalls INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

31. 2: unwillingness to collaborate RISK: Utility and automation companies will be unwilling to share their proprietary languages High probability of occurrence with a medium impact on overall project MITIGATION: Encompasses a variety of strategies Form contracts that encompass legality issues Contracts will detail viewing privileges and conversion specifics Restrict protocol access to select individuals Through the use of swipe cards, passwords, or biometrics ($550 finger print scanner) Use of encrypted disks Store within a fireproof safe or a bank vault 31 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

32. 3: lack of qualified personnel RISK: After initial implementation of the mediator, few personnel will be qualified High probability of occurrence with a medium impact on overall project MITIGATION: Encompasses a variety of strategies Construct a training program organized by outside experts Without training, experts can charge $50-$60/hour Attend manufacturer’s seminars Costly, but increases employees’ knowledge in dealing with mediator problems/errors Offer courses at universities Educate the IT personnel of the future Courses deal with translation of multiple protocols into one (core of mediator) 32 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

33. 4: software incapability's RISK: Mediator is static which prohibits software updates Medium probability of occurrence with a high impact on overall project MITIGATION: Encompasses a variety of strategies Work with the manufacturer of the mediator to make software updates for the mediator Forecast new languages for devices and only buy those devices that use languages identified by the mediator Create standards for future energy devices employed by buildings This would allow us to avoid costly software updates, while allowing our system to run just as efficiently and effectively. 33 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

34. 5: transmission interference RISK: Wireless transmission media is not always 100% reliable Low probability of occurrence with a low impact on overall project MITIGATION: Encompasses a variety of strategies Install wireless routers in areas conducive to strong signal strength Avoid basements, closets, areas under desks Update router’s firmware monthly (if possible) Most updates provided freely by manufacturer Train staff to monitor network at all times Teach staff proper ways to handle network connectivity problems to reduce amount of harm imposed by “down time” 34 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

35. team challenges Jon Vettori 35 what worked? what needed improvement? REDteam

36. what worked? Delegating tasks to individuals and combining Meeting after class for a few minutes to keep everyone on track / on the same page Cell phones / mass texts and reminders Honesty, Urgency, Responsibility Free online communication / collaboration tools… 36 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

37. google groups 37 [groups.google.com] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

38. google docs 38 [docs.google.com] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

39. google wave 39 [wave.google.com] INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

40. what needed improvement? Using all of the scheduled lab time to better delegate tasks Make corrections and improvements for documents/presentations as we got them back when it was fresh in our memory Preemptively completed tasks and assignments ahead of the week it was due 40 INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

41. conclusion REDteam 41 “Knowledge is Power” INTRO PROBLEM SOLUTION IMPACT CHALLENGES CONCLUSION

42. [Kevin Powell, GSA, 2009] [http://www.atlas-solar.com/grid.asp] [Energy Information Administration, U.S. Dept. of Energy, 2008] [http://www.aia.org/press/AIAS077318] [http://www.sun-works.com/products/grid_tied/grid_tied.html] [http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080730/images/454570a-6.jpg] [Ed Richards, Cisco, 2009] [Alexis Ringwald, Valence Energy, 2009] [Engineered Systems, 2009] [groups.google.com] [docs.google.com] [wave.google.com] references 42 REDteam

43. QUESTIONS? IST220 : REDteam Josh Wentz, Kim Klinikowski, Christopher Alvarado, Marco DeLeonardis, Brendan Jann, & Jon Vettori 43