SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  75
Fukushima Dai-ichiNuclear Power Station  Accident by Joseph S. Miller EDA, Inc presented  at  ASME Energy Committee Colloquium May 10, 2011 Brigham Young University
Introduction Over 35 Years in the Nuclear Power Industry MS Nuclear, BS Mechanical, BS Industrial Worked at a BWR Nuclear Power Station for 9 years. Responsible for fuel, safety analyses and PRA. Responsible for the Nuclear Steam Supply Systems Technical Support Manager for Emergency Response Organization. Supported the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in reviewing Nuclear Power Plant Safety Systems.
Acknowledgement for Use of their Reference Material Thanks to Japanese Industrial Atomic Forum (JIAF) Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) AREVA PowerPoint- The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun  Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) & Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES) on Plant Data Lake H. Barrett-  Foundation For Nuclear Studies Briefing  General Electric VGB Power Tech
The Fukushima DaiichiAccident Plant Designs (Covered by Tom Hafera) What Happened? Accident Progression Spent fuel pools Radiological releases Impact on US
PWR – Pressurized Water Reactor
Nuclear Chain Reaction
What Happened?
The Real Catastrophe was from the Tsunami 26,000 (dead &missing) & 130,000 homeless (April 28, 2011) Lead four plants at Fukushima I to fuel damage and large releases of radiation
Tsunami Size Was Accident Cause 3/11 15:45 at Fukushima I
The tsunami hits Fukushima I
Plant Designs - Fukushima Dai-Ichi  BWR is a Boiling Water Reactor Unit 1 is BWR/3 Units 2-4 are BWR/4 There are 56 Reactors in Japan (1-FBR, 4-ABWR, 29-BWR, 23-PWR) compared to 104 Reactors in the USA (35 BWRs & 69 PWRs) The Fukushima I reactors began operation in the 1970’s so they are all thirty - forty years old. Fukushima I Units 1-4 all are early vintage Mark I Containment Designs
 What happened? ,[object Object],when the earthquake first hit. Off-Site power was lost. ,[object Object]
All AC power to the station was lost when the tsunami flooded the EDGs, which occurred about 1 hour after the earthquake.
At that point, the plant experienced a complete blackout (no AC electric power at all).  Commonly called a “Station Blackout”.
Only battery power was left.,[object Object]
Containment Isolation
The Tsunami Hits
Decay Heat
Typical ECCS for BWR/3 & /4
 What happened in Unit 1? ,[object Object]
Boiling began in the suppression pool and the drywell pressure began to increased in about 11 hours after the SBO.
In about 16 hours the water level in the core began to decrease and core degradation occurred (through some combination of zirconium oxidation and clad failure).
Venting occurred at about 23 hours after SBO and the hydrogen explosion occurred in the RB about 1 hour later.
Sea water was injected into the core at about 31 hours after SBO. ,[object Object]
Tank is 55 feet long, 12 feet in diameter
26,000 gallon tank
Make-up to IC tank is from CST via AC pumps
W/O AC, water in tank is an effective coolant for about 2-6 hours,[object Object]
 What happened Unit 2? ,[object Object]
The RCIC turbine drives a pump using make-up water from the wet well or CST
High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) wasn’t used or did not work for Unit 2
DC power from batteries and/or the use of DC powered pumps were lost after 70 hours, which is phenomenal considering that they are only designed to last 8 hours.
Although sea water was injected within an hour after the loss of RCIC, it appears that water level continued to decrease in the RV and DW pressure increased.  Significant pressure increases were observed in the RV.
No venting of the DW was observed
DW pressure stayed high on 3/15 00:00 and an explosion was heard in the lower part of the reactor building.
It is believed that the primary containment was damaged.  ,[object Object]
Isolation Condenser (Unit 1) and RCIC (Units 2 & 3) Were Used to Cool the Plants
Unit 2 Primary Containment Pressure (D/W) & Reactor Pressure (3/11 – 3/17)
 What happened Unit 3? ,[object Object]
DC power from batteries and/or use of DC powered pumps were lost after 35 hours (half the time when using only RCIC system for Unit 2), which is great considering that they are only designed to last 8 hours.
Sea water was injected within 6 hours after the loss of RCIC & HPCI, and it appears that water level continued to decrease in the RV and DW pressure increased.  Core damaged was assumed to occur during this time period.
Venting of the DW was observed at 43 hours and at 64 hours after SBO.
An explosion in the top of the reactor building occurred 4 hours after second venting began.,[object Object]
Unit 3 Primary Containment Pressure (D/W) & Reactor Pressure (3/11 – 3/17)
Units 1, 2 & 3 Water Level
Units 1, 2 & 3 Reactor Pressure
Units 1, 2 & 3 Drywell Pressure
RCIC  Works for about 66 Hours (Unit 2) and 34 Hours (Unit 3) ,[object Object]
 3/14   13:25 in Unit 2
 3/13  2:46 in Unit 3
 Decay Heat Causes the water to boil in the reactor Vessel and the pressure rises in the Reactor Vessel.
 The steam is released into the wet-wet through the SRVs
 Since there is no make up, the water level falls in the reactor  vessel,[object Object]
Zr-Water Begins at
Release of Fission Products
Containment is Last Barrier
Venting the Containment
Hydrogen Explosion Units 1 & 3

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Fukushima disaster cameron and cooper
 Fukushima disaster cameron and cooper Fukushima disaster cameron and cooper
Fukushima disaster cameron and cooper
lamshed
 
Chernobyl incident
Chernobyl incidentChernobyl incident
Chernobyl incident
ls_kok
 
Disaster At Chernobyl
Disaster At ChernobylDisaster At Chernobyl
Disaster At Chernobyl
Ben Dover
 

Tendances (20)

Chernobyl disaster - A ppt by Nithin, Praveen, Navaneeth and Ashwin :D
Chernobyl disaster - A ppt by Nithin, Praveen, Navaneeth and Ashwin :DChernobyl disaster - A ppt by Nithin, Praveen, Navaneeth and Ashwin :D
Chernobyl disaster - A ppt by Nithin, Praveen, Navaneeth and Ashwin :D
 
Fukushima disaster cameron and cooper
 Fukushima disaster cameron and cooper Fukushima disaster cameron and cooper
Fukushima disaster cameron and cooper
 
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Disaster
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant DisasterChernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Disaster
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Disaster
 
Chernobyl Disaster 1986 PPT By Gokul V Mahajan.
Chernobyl Disaster 1986 PPT By Gokul V Mahajan.Chernobyl Disaster 1986 PPT By Gokul V Mahajan.
Chernobyl Disaster 1986 PPT By Gokul V Mahajan.
 
Chernobyl incident
Chernobyl incidentChernobyl incident
Chernobyl incident
 
Disaster in Chernobyl
Disaster in ChernobylDisaster in Chernobyl
Disaster in Chernobyl
 
Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster - 1986
Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster - 1986Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster - 1986
Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster - 1986
 
Chernobyl disaster
Chernobyl disasterChernobyl disaster
Chernobyl disaster
 
Chernobyl tragedy
Chernobyl tragedyChernobyl tragedy
Chernobyl tragedy
 
Nueclear disasters and fire hazards
Nueclear disasters and fire hazardsNueclear disasters and fire hazards
Nueclear disasters and fire hazards
 
FUKUSHIMA DISASTER.pptx
FUKUSHIMA DISASTER.pptxFUKUSHIMA DISASTER.pptx
FUKUSHIMA DISASTER.pptx
 
Bhopal slides
Bhopal slidesBhopal slides
Bhopal slides
 
Nuclear accidents
Nuclear accidents Nuclear accidents
Nuclear accidents
 
Chernobyl Disaster
Chernobyl DisasterChernobyl Disaster
Chernobyl Disaster
 
Nuclear disasters
Nuclear disastersNuclear disasters
Nuclear disasters
 
Disaster At Chernobyl
Disaster At ChernobylDisaster At Chernobyl
Disaster At Chernobyl
 
Chernobyl
ChernobylChernobyl
Chernobyl
 
Chernobyl disaster
Chernobyl disasterChernobyl disaster
Chernobyl disaster
 
Chernobyl Nuclear Powerplant Disaster
Chernobyl Nuclear Powerplant DisasterChernobyl Nuclear Powerplant Disaster
Chernobyl Nuclear Powerplant Disaster
 
Chernobyl Disaster.
Chernobyl Disaster.Chernobyl Disaster.
Chernobyl Disaster.
 

Similaire à Fukushima Daiichi Byu Presentation

An analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants
An analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power PlantsAn analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants
An analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants
Raja Mitra
 

Similaire à Fukushima Daiichi Byu Presentation (20)

FinalPresentation.pptx
FinalPresentation.pptxFinalPresentation.pptx
FinalPresentation.pptx
 
51564602
5156460251564602
51564602
 
Fukushima
FukushimaFukushima
Fukushima
 
Fukushima
FukushimaFukushima
Fukushima
 
Fukushima daiichiareva
Fukushima daiichiarevaFukushima daiichiareva
Fukushima daiichiareva
 
An analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants
An analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power PlantsAn analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants
An analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants
 
Three Mile Island Meltdown
Three Mile Island MeltdownThree Mile Island Meltdown
Three Mile Island Meltdown
 
Nuclear power station
Nuclear power stationNuclear power station
Nuclear power station
 
Reacteur BWR Fukushima
Reacteur BWR FukushimaReacteur BWR Fukushima
Reacteur BWR Fukushima
 
Accident de fukushima
Accident de fukushimaAccident de fukushima
Accident de fukushima
 
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear PlantThe Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant
 
Plan B
Plan BPlan B
Plan B
 
1
11
1
 
1
11
1
 
Nuclear reactors, A collaborative approach towards main streams and a general...
Nuclear reactors, A collaborative approach towards main streams and a general...Nuclear reactors, A collaborative approach towards main streams and a general...
Nuclear reactors, A collaborative approach towards main streams and a general...
 
Chernobyl_disaster.pdf
Chernobyl_disaster.pdfChernobyl_disaster.pdf
Chernobyl_disaster.pdf
 
Nuclear power plant
Nuclear power plant Nuclear power plant
Nuclear power plant
 
Nuclear Power Plant by: Cris Macaranas
Nuclear Power Plant by: Cris MacaranasNuclear Power Plant by: Cris Macaranas
Nuclear Power Plant by: Cris Macaranas
 
Nuclear powersem
Nuclear powersemNuclear powersem
Nuclear powersem
 
Nuclear power system
Nuclear power systemNuclear power system
Nuclear power system
 

Dernier

Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Joaquim Jorge
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
vu2urc
 
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
?#DUbAI#??##{{(☎️+971_581248768%)**%*]'#abortion pills for sale in dubai@
 

Dernier (20)

A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
Advantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your Business
Advantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your BusinessAdvantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your Business
Advantages of Hiring UIUX Design Service Providers for Your Business
 
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps ScriptAutomating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
 
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
 
HTML Injection Attacks: Impact and Mitigation Strategies
HTML Injection Attacks: Impact and Mitigation StrategiesHTML Injection Attacks: Impact and Mitigation Strategies
HTML Injection Attacks: Impact and Mitigation Strategies
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdfTech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
 
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
 
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
 
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
 
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 

Fukushima Daiichi Byu Presentation

  • 1. Fukushima Dai-ichiNuclear Power Station Accident by Joseph S. Miller EDA, Inc presented at ASME Energy Committee Colloquium May 10, 2011 Brigham Young University
  • 2. Introduction Over 35 Years in the Nuclear Power Industry MS Nuclear, BS Mechanical, BS Industrial Worked at a BWR Nuclear Power Station for 9 years. Responsible for fuel, safety analyses and PRA. Responsible for the Nuclear Steam Supply Systems Technical Support Manager for Emergency Response Organization. Supported the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in reviewing Nuclear Power Plant Safety Systems.
  • 3. Acknowledgement for Use of their Reference Material Thanks to Japanese Industrial Atomic Forum (JIAF) Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) AREVA PowerPoint- The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) & Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES) on Plant Data Lake H. Barrett- Foundation For Nuclear Studies Briefing General Electric VGB Power Tech
  • 4. The Fukushima DaiichiAccident Plant Designs (Covered by Tom Hafera) What Happened? Accident Progression Spent fuel pools Radiological releases Impact on US
  • 5. PWR – Pressurized Water Reactor
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 10.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17. The Real Catastrophe was from the Tsunami 26,000 (dead &missing) & 130,000 homeless (April 28, 2011) Lead four plants at Fukushima I to fuel damage and large releases of radiation
  • 18.
  • 19. Tsunami Size Was Accident Cause 3/11 15:45 at Fukushima I
  • 20. The tsunami hits Fukushima I
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24. Plant Designs - Fukushima Dai-Ichi BWR is a Boiling Water Reactor Unit 1 is BWR/3 Units 2-4 are BWR/4 There are 56 Reactors in Japan (1-FBR, 4-ABWR, 29-BWR, 23-PWR) compared to 104 Reactors in the USA (35 BWRs & 69 PWRs) The Fukushima I reactors began operation in the 1970’s so they are all thirty - forty years old. Fukushima I Units 1-4 all are early vintage Mark I Containment Designs
  • 25.
  • 26. All AC power to the station was lost when the tsunami flooded the EDGs, which occurred about 1 hour after the earthquake.
  • 27. At that point, the plant experienced a complete blackout (no AC electric power at all). Commonly called a “Station Blackout”.
  • 28.
  • 32. Typical ECCS for BWR/3 & /4
  • 33.
  • 34. Boiling began in the suppression pool and the drywell pressure began to increased in about 11 hours after the SBO.
  • 35. In about 16 hours the water level in the core began to decrease and core degradation occurred (through some combination of zirconium oxidation and clad failure).
  • 36. Venting occurred at about 23 hours after SBO and the hydrogen explosion occurred in the RB about 1 hour later.
  • 37.
  • 38. Tank is 55 feet long, 12 feet in diameter
  • 40. Make-up to IC tank is from CST via AC pumps
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44. The RCIC turbine drives a pump using make-up water from the wet well or CST
  • 45. High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) wasn’t used or did not work for Unit 2
  • 46. DC power from batteries and/or the use of DC powered pumps were lost after 70 hours, which is phenomenal considering that they are only designed to last 8 hours.
  • 47. Although sea water was injected within an hour after the loss of RCIC, it appears that water level continued to decrease in the RV and DW pressure increased. Significant pressure increases were observed in the RV.
  • 48. No venting of the DW was observed
  • 49. DW pressure stayed high on 3/15 00:00 and an explosion was heard in the lower part of the reactor building.
  • 50.
  • 51. Isolation Condenser (Unit 1) and RCIC (Units 2 & 3) Were Used to Cool the Plants
  • 52. Unit 2 Primary Containment Pressure (D/W) & Reactor Pressure (3/11 – 3/17)
  • 53.
  • 54. DC power from batteries and/or use of DC powered pumps were lost after 35 hours (half the time when using only RCIC system for Unit 2), which is great considering that they are only designed to last 8 hours.
  • 55. Sea water was injected within 6 hours after the loss of RCIC & HPCI, and it appears that water level continued to decrease in the RV and DW pressure increased. Core damaged was assumed to occur during this time period.
  • 56. Venting of the DW was observed at 43 hours and at 64 hours after SBO.
  • 57.
  • 58. Unit 3 Primary Containment Pressure (D/W) & Reactor Pressure (3/11 – 3/17)
  • 59.
  • 60. Units 1, 2 & 3 Water Level
  • 61. Units 1, 2 & 3 Reactor Pressure
  • 62. Units 1, 2 & 3 Drywell Pressure
  • 63.
  • 64. 3/14 13:25 in Unit 2
  • 65. 3/13 2:46 in Unit 3
  • 66. Decay Heat Causes the water to boil in the reactor Vessel and the pressure rises in the Reactor Vessel.
  • 67. The steam is released into the wet-wet through the SRVs
  • 68.
  • 70. Release of Fission Products
  • 74.
  • 75.
  • 76. Damage to Torus Unit 2
  • 77.
  • 79.
  • 81. Fukushima Dai-ichi Site Reactor and Fuel Specifications
  • 82.
  • 83.
  • 84.
  • 85.
  • 86.
  • 87.
  • 88.
  • 89.
  • 90.
  • 91. Fukushima Observations Not a Public Heath Catastrophe Inconsequential to Earth/Tsunami Impacts The Fukushima event rating was provisionally increased from level 5 to level 7 by Japanese officials on April 12, due to computer analyses indicating total discharged iodine-131 and caesium-137 in the early days of the event were sufficient to warrant an increased rating level. This rating increase did not reflect any new event. The radioactive release from Fukushima is very roughly estimated by Japanese officials to be about 10 percent of that released from the Chernobyl accident – with very important differences.
  • 92. Fukushima Observations Not a Public Heath Catastrophe The most important difference between Chernobyl and Fukushima is no deaths or illness among the public are expected from the Fukushima incident. The Chernobyl accident emitted radioactive particles high into the atmosphere, which spread downwind across Europe, and a reactor fire continued this process for at least 10 days. Radiation from the Fukushima incident is mostly in the form of liquid runoff into the ocean and low-altitude particles that have frequently blown out into the ocean. At Fukushima, the reactor fuel remains inside the primary containment structures, whereas the Soviet Chernobyl design did not have a containment structure.
  • 93. Fukushima Observations What is the risk of radioactivity getting into the US food supply? Normally very little food from the Fukushima region is imported into the USA. Affected foods from the region around the Fukushima plant have been banned from export by the Government of Japan. Any food from that area not already restricted by the Government of Japan will be detained for testing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and not allowed into the USA unless shown to be absolutely free of contamination.
  • 94. Three Mile Island History Reactor Scram: 04:00 3/28/79 Core melt and relocation: ~ 05:00 –07:30 3/28/79 Hydrogen Deflagration: 13:00 3/28/79 Recirculation Cooling: Late 3/28/79 Phased Water Processing: 1979‐1993 Containment Entry: July 1980 Reactor Head removed and core melt found: July 1984 Start Defuel: October 1985 Shipping Spent Fuel: 1988‐1990 Finish Defuel: Jan 1990 Evaporate ~2M gallons Processed Water: 1991‐93 Cost: ~$1 Billion
  • 95. Impact on US Reactors US has implemented B.5.b requirements in 2008 Beyond Severe Accident Guidelines Onsite high pressure portable pump Procedures and appropriate staging areas and requirements for fire hoses and equipment on site MOUs with fire local fire stations to establish the plant as a priority in case of an emergency.
  • 96. Impact on US Reactor Some of the things that should be reviewed Review all external events, i.e., fire, flooding, explosions and earthquake, to ensure that there is backup emergency equipment that can support a station black out. Review training for extreme station Blackout events and procedure. Ensure that emergency batteries are qualified for worst case events for fl0od, fire, explosions and seismic. The portable high pressure pump and associated equipment that was required because of B.5.b should be housed in a structure that is qualified for worst case fire, flood, explosion and seismic events.