How Health Leaders Can Use Word Clouds to Achieve Thier Missions
Utaaa 2013 presentation
1. Julie Larsen
University of Texas at Dallas
Assistant Director of Emerging Media and Communication
Megan Gray
University of Texas at Dallas
Assistant Director of the Humanities
2. Identify and discuss our core values
Understand advising core values as defined by
NACADA
Find congruence and conflict between personal
values and advising values
Create a plan to find balance between personal and
advising values
3. On a scale of 1-10:
How happy are you in your current
advising position?
Do your personal values feel in conflict
with the values and goals of your office?
10. What inspired you to become an academic advisor?
What drives you to continue to be an advisor?
What is unique about your advising style?
What is your long term professional goal as related to
advising?
Why do you need to have your own philosophy
even if your department has one?
13. What are you already doing to reconcile
your personal and office philosophy?
What are new ways you can reconcile
conflicts between your office and personal
values?
What roadblocks my prevent you from
applying your philosophy and action plan?
Which of your values are apparent in your work as an advisor?Which of your values do not impact your advising?Why do some values impact your advising while others do not?How do you choose which ones to use when advising?
To the individuals they advise.For involving others, when appropriate, in the advising process.To their institutions.To higher education.To their educational community.For their professional practice and for themselves personally.
Why can our personal values have a negative impact in advising?How can we create a healthy balance (using our values in an appropriate way)?
Why can our personal values have a negative impact in advising?How can we create a healthy balance (using our values in an appropriate way)?