1. THE INTEGRATED COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ACT NO 24 OF 2008 (ICMA) – AND THE
AMENDMENT BILL
Jennifer WHITTAL, South Africa
2. Introduction
PROBLEM:
differently interpreted, and possibly contested, by the
various professions who will need to operate within the
framework it creates
some aspects have complex implications
AIM:
to understand the ICMA from a professional land
surveyor’s perspective
to propose some solutions
3. This presentation addresses the
following:
The definition and nature of HWM in SA legislation
Datums, water marks, legislation in the coastal zone
The HWM as a cadastral boundary
Coastal Zone boundaries derived from the HWM
6. Coastal Waters
‘coastal waters’ means—
(a) the internal waters, territorial waters, exclusive
economic zone and continental shelf of the Republic
referred to in sections 3, 4, 7 and 8 of the Maritime
Zones Act, 1994 (Act No.15 of 1994), respectively;
and
(b) an estuary;
7. The HWM definitions
HWM (old)
“means the highest line reached by the
water of the sea during ordinary storms
occurring during the most stormy period of
the year, excluding exceptional or
abnormal floods” (SSA, section 1)
HWM (ICMA)
“means the highest line reached by coastal waters, but
excluding any line reached as a result of
exceptional or abnormal floods or storms that occur no
more than once in ten years, or
an estuary being closed to the sea”
(ICMA, Section 1(1)).
8. The HWM definitions
HWM (ICMA Amendment Act)
‘high-water mark’ means the highest line reached
by coastal waters, but excluding any line reached
as a result of—
(a) exceptional or abnormal [floods or storms
that occur no more than once in ten years]
weather or sea conditions; or
(b) an estuary being closed to the sea;
(ICMA Amendment Bill, Section 1(q)).
9. HWM (b) definition
swash line or a hard line
(harbours)
influenced by weather (winds,
storms, air pressure, temperature
and humidity etc.) or sea
conditions (wave action, the
tides, sea level changes, water
composition etc.)
a line of variable height - not a
contour; not a tidal datum
no time limit/period
10. Estuary
‘estuary’ means a body of surface water—
(a) [that is part of a water course] that is permanently or periodically
open to the sea;
(b) in which a rise and fall of the water level as a result of the tides is
measurable at spring tides when the [water course] body of surface
water is open to the sea; or
(c) in respect of which the salinity is [measurably] higher than fresh
water as a result of the influence of the sea, and where there is a
salinity gradient between the tidal reach and the mouth of the body
of surface water;
11. What events are included in
defining the HWM?
Ordinary storm events
Over any time period incl annual
Weather and sea conditions
flooding estuaries?
Estuaries can be flooded by weather
conditions and still remain an
estuary in terms of the definition
All spring tides included
Open estuaries
Temporarily closed to the sea?
If closed for 1 year vs 20
years…when can it be considered a
closed estuary?
13. Section 14 ICMA AA
Position of high-water mark
14. (1) No person may replace the high-water mark curvilinear boundary with
a straight line boundary in terms of section 34 of the Land Survey Act.
(2) If the high-water mark is landward of a straight line boundary of a
coastal land unit when this Act took effect, or the high-water mark moves
landward of a straight line boundary of a coastal land unit due to the erosion
of the coast, sea-level rise or other causes, the owner of that coastal land unit—
(a) loses ownership of any portion of that coastal land unit that is situated below the
high-water mark to the extent that such land unit becomes coastal public property;
and
(b) is not entitled to compensation from the State for that loss of ownership, unless the
movement of the high-water mark was caused by an intentional or negligent act or
omission by an organ of state and was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of that
act or omission.
14. Erosion and accretion – str line
Str line seaward boundary – Erosion:
Erosion leads to portion below the HWM transferring ownership
of the “land unit” to CPP
Looking at definition of “land unit” this implies registrability under
the Deeds Registries Act which implies formal subdivision at
least if not formal transfer.
Confusion as to whether the whole land unit becomes CPP
Str line seaward boundary – Accretion:
Accretion prior to subdivision will not result in the former land
unit regaining land if CPP extent inland can be proven
Accretion prior to subdivision will result in the land unit regaining
land if the CPP extent inland cannot be shown
Accretion after subdivision and transfer will have no effect as the
subdivided land unit will be declared CPP in its entirety and be
owned by the State. No portion will revert to
ownership of the former parent land parcel.
15. Erosion and accretion - ambulatory
Note – a HWM boundary can no longer be substituted by a straight
line boundary
The ICMA AA is silent on erosion and accretion of ambulatory HWM
boundary and so the principles of the SSA are the same here
HWM seaward boundary – Erosion:
The boundary is ambulatory and if there is erosion, the land unit loses
land to the CPP.
There is not requirement to survey or transfer land
HWM seaward boundary – Accretion:
The boundary is ambulatory and if there is accretion, the land unit
gains land from the CPP.
There is not requirement to survey or transfer land
Reclamation ≠ accretion
17. Locating the position of the HWM
Note that there is a HWM irrespective
of whether this is a cadastral boundary
or not at the location in question.
Case law - physical inspection by PLS and
SGO: debris and waste, vegetation types,
drift sands, discolouration on coastal rocks,
evidence of local residents
Beaconing does not alter ambulatory
position
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24. Drift sand developed into a dune field adjoining a stabilised dune covered with
hardwood coastal forest northeast of the Mcantsi estuary.
Picture of a storm-damaged
beach at Salt Rock. A sand berm
indicates a natural re-
establishment of the high water
mark after a storm removed all
evidence of its lawful position
EC SG information
25. The Halophyte Sarcocornia perennis growing in the intertidal zone between
the Mlele estuary and the sea – they are found below the HWM
A sandy seashore at the mouth of the Cefane River, indicating several
types of vegetation that can be considered to define the position of high
water mark. Xerophytes are found above the HWM.
26. Summary from EC SG
Tidal ebb and flow, wave action and wind are the key
features of the littoral (intertidal) zone.
The high water mark being the inland border thereof is
seldom visibly defined by the very distinct line of the
edge of the hardwood coastal forests visible on aerial
photographs.
Instead, it is an ambulatory line – a continually moving
line needing close inspection for the presence of:
Halophytes, salt water washed landscape and rock
discolouration below the high water mark, and
Xerophytes, Mesophytes, debris, drift sand and wind-dominated
landscape above the high water mark.
30. Proposals which have now been incorporated:
Leave the HWM cadastral boundaries as they were
under the Sea Shore Act
HWM boundary remains curvilinear and ambulatory over
time – simple to understand and implement
Is not legally affected by survey or beaconing – surveyed
position does not become the legal HWM
legal HWM coincides with physical HWM
……
31. Proposals which have now been incorporated:
The principle of submerged boundaries falls away –
a partially submerged land unit then has a HWM
curvilinear and ambulatory boundary
Becomes an investment/insurance/market issue for
property owner – no state liability
Rights to the sea shore override land owners rights when
HWM over the land
Accretion and erosion principles of 150 years of
case law retained
33. Coastal Management Line
‘coastal management line’ means a line determined
by an MEC in accordance with section 25 in order to
demarcate an area within which development will be
prohibited or controlled in order to achieve the objects
of this Act or coastal management objectives
…..Section 25
the MEC must consider the location of immovable
property and the ownership and zonation of vacant
land.
34. Coastal Protected Zone
All land within 1000 m (1km) of HWM
Zoned agricultural
Zoning undetermined or Not zoned
Excluding lawful township, urban area or human settlement
All other land within 100m of HWM
If part of water body is in these areas then include it
All private land below HWM
Sea shore (LWM-HWM) and littoral active zones
Admiralty reserves, sensitive areas, CPAs
1:50 year flood/storm plains
39. Survey procedures
PLS surveys the physical HWM – evidence should be used
to ascertain its position as per definition in AA
E-Record submitted to SGO as in HWM survey – position
noted on Noting Sheets, accuracy given to nearest
2 metres (?)
HWM position conveyed to local authority for planning and
property development control purposes
Local authority should need help with calculating the position
of CPZ inland boundary in relation to the cadastre
If tasked to do this, force the CPZ boundary to coincide with
inland cadastral boundaries of all parcels in accordance with
ICMA AA
41. Theoretical/methodological
framework
Land Management Paradigm:
Rights Restrictions and Responsibilities (RRRs)
Usual real rights associated with ownership
Development rights and restrictions
Use rights and restrictions
Responsibilities (e.g. maintenance)
All are real since relate to land not owner
Determination of boundaries of these RRRs is a cadastral
function
42. Who should conduct HWM surveys?
Land rights at sea shore are limited by the HWM ∴ HWM is
cadastral
HWM and coastal zone determination are not as simple as
they seem – measurement and modelling needs to stand up
in the courts
The extent of coastal zones can be determined without a
Land Surveyor, but their position relative to cadastral
boundaries is to be indicated on zoning maps for owners
Registrar notes in register that the HWM has been surveyed
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
My name is Jenny Whittal – academic member of staff in Geomatics at the University of Cape Town.
The new legislation is likely to be differently interpreted, and possibly contested, by the various professions who will need to operate within the framework it creates – environmentalists, planners, developers and land surveyors.
This contribution provides an interpretation of the Act from the perspective of a Professional Land Surveyor.
This paper addresses the following:
The definition and nature of HWM in SA legislation
Datums, water marks, legislation in the coastal zone
The HWM as a cadastral boundary
And the
Coastal Zone boundaries derived from the HWM
Then …..
Proposals are made
Under the ICMA, a number of coastal zones are specified, the CW, CPP and CPZ are determined in relation to the HWM boundary.
Coastal public property (CPP)
Coastal protection zone (CPZ)
Coastal access land (CAL)
Coastal waters (CW)
Coastal protected areas (CPA)
Special management areas (SMA)
Coastal set-back lines (CSL)
HWM (old)
“means the highest line reached by the water of the sea during ordinary storms occurring during the most stormy period of the year, excluding exceptional or abnormal floods” (SSA, section 1)
HWM (new)
“means the highest line reached by coastal waters, but excluding any line reached as a result of:
exceptional or abnormal floods or storms that occur no more than once in ten years, or
an estuary being closed to the sea” (ICMA, Section 1(1)).
‘high-water mark’ means the highest line reached by coastal waters, but excluding any line reached as a result of—
(a) exceptional or abnormal [floods or storms that occur no more than once in ten years] weather or sea conditions; or
(b) an estuary being closed to the sea;
Compared to SSA:
HWM (old)
“means the highest line reached by the water of the sea [during ordinary storms occurring during the most stormy period of the year], excluding exceptional or abnormal floods” (SSA, section 1)
Compared to SSA:
no time period mentioned – no storms/stormiest period – this is implied in ICMA AA
Confusion of floods in SSA: “fluxtus” = floods vs. “fluxes” = swash – removed confusion
Weather and sea conditions mentioned explicitly
Includes estuaries now
HWM is
the swash line, or the highest points reached by the sea in any circumstances (astronomical and meteorological/weather) other than in stormy conditions in a worse than 1:10 year storm. Except in harbours where it is likely to be a hard line.
influenced by the combined effects of winds, wave action, the tides, storms, sea level changes, air pressure, water composition etc.
a line of variable height (not a contour) and horizontal position - as the HWM is defined in terms of dynamic sea conditions, it does not coincide with a tidal datum
can be determined in annual storm/spring cycle
(b) And (c) only WHEN open to the sea. So in order to be classified as an estuary one OR other of these must be fulfilled at times when the estuary is open. This means that you don’t have to measure salinity if you can simply observe tidal action in the open water body.
NB: excludes underground water but not water in caves “surface water”
The HWM will be the means the highest line reached by the water including weather conditions (rainfall over land) which are not exceptional or abnormal – in other words fresh water filling the temporarily closed estuary. So the correct survey should be when the estuary is closed and after a regular storm weather event/rainfall. The coastal public property (sea shore) will include all land that is inundated with water of any kind when the estuary is both open (tidal activity combined with storm/weather) or closed (weather).
There are too many variants of estuaries between those that are permanently closed or permanently open to the sea.
What about those which are temporarily closed?
e.g. estuary closed now – so limited salinity, no variation because of tides, and HWM is
Kaaimans river plet
"to the extent that such land unit" seems to imply the whole land unit since the definition of a land unit is not a portion of a land unit which it would be at the time of erosion. I am concerned that once the seaward boundary is lost to the sea, that the whole land unit becomes CPP in accordance with the law. This would occur before there is any time for a subdivision so that a new land unit, being the inundated portion, could be created. I think it should read (in accordance with (a)): "to the extent that such portion of the land unit becomes coastal public property"
For HWM cadastral property boundaries
Following case law, physical evidence is most often used in South Africa. The presence of debris and waste, vegetation types, drift sands, discolouration on coastal rocks, evidence of local residents, may all be used in the determination of the location of the HWM.
Beaconing does not alter ambulatory position
This figure illustrates the difference in the position of the LWM (ICMA) and the MLW line (MZA), and the corresponding difference in definitions of the sea shore (ICMA) and internal waters (MZA).
The HWM defines the upper extent of the sea shore. But, as with the internal waters of the MZA, includes the HWM of estuaries.
The offset between the heights on land and depths at sea is given as the difference in the vertical datums of the LAT/CD and the LLD.
The legislation governing the property rights in the coastal zone is mainly a combination of the ICMA, the MZA and the LSA. There are also many other acts relating to the coastal zone, including those governing marine living resources, the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982), monuments and water legislation, development legislation, biological diversity and environmental legislation , and mining and mineral rights legislation. Municipal development legislation also applies such as zoning schemes, building controls etc.
In the Amendment Bill, the Coastal Waters now extend to the Continental Shelf
Leave the HWM cadastral boundaries as they were under the Sea Shore Act
Boundary remains curvilinear and ambulatory over time – simple to understand and implement
Is not legally affected by survey or beaconing – surveyed position does not become the legal HWM
Replacement of HWM boundary by straight line boundary remains a sensible and practical option (but does not limit rights to or management of the sea shore)
Leave the HWM cadastral boundaries as they were under the Sea Shore Act …. (continued)
Avoids reversion from straight line boundaries at sea shore back to HWM curvilinear boundaries
Land will simply be lost to the sea – beacons and boundaries become submerged
Becomes an investment/insurance/market issue for property owner – no state liability
Rights to the sea shore override land owners rights when HWM over the land
Accretion and erosion principles of 150 years of case law retained
Various coastal zones are defined in terms of set backs from the HWM. How we should these set back boundaries be determined?
Fortunately the ICMA talks about set distances FROM the HWM instead of lines parallel to the HWM. The latter is problematic as the HWM is a fractal curvilinear boundary and parallel lines cannot be constructed to be mathematically meaningful.
Various coastal zones are defined in terms of set backs from the HWM. How we should these set back boundaries be determined?
Fortunately the ICMA talks about set distances FROM the HWM instead of lines parallel to the HWM. The latter is problematic as the HWM is a fractal curvilinear boundary and parallel lines cannot be constructed to be mathematically meaningful.
Three ways of constructing boundaries derived from the HWM will be discussed – two incorrect and one correct.
In this construction the HWM boundaries along the coast are simply shifted inland by the required amount ... 100m in urban areas or 1000 m in rural areas. This is not correct since all points along the inland coastal zone boundary are not a set distance from the HWM
The separation between points along the derived coastal zone boundary and the HWM boundary will exceed the separation between the parallel lines with every swing of the HWM seaward. This method of construction is therefore not in line with the ICMA provisions.
The most important difference in the two methods occurs when the HWM curves seaward. The constant offset distance between the derived curve and the HWM curve is retained at these points, while in the parallel offset method it is not. This method is in line with the ICMA requirements, as long as the surveyed points are not too far apart.
Issues of the uncertainty in the location of the HWM and the consequent projected uncertainty in the coastal zone boundaries generated inland of the HWM are covered in the paper. It is my opinion that it is unlikely that the uncertainty of 1-2 metres in locating the HWM will be acceptable inland particularly when development rights are affected. Should these uncertainties be stated on survey diagrams of the HWM and coastal zones and if so, how?
Set back lines for coastal zones
Determine set back from the physical HWM as surveyed – evidence should be used to ascertain its position as per definition in AA clause (b)
Inland CPZ boundary should
Coincide with cadastral boundary where close enough
50 m (?) in urban areas
100 m (?) in rural areas?
Where not close enough, should be surveyed by a registered PLS
Survey in terms of LS Act
E-Record submitted to SGO as in HWM survey – position noted on Noting Sheets, accuracy given to nearest 2 metres (?)
Position conveyed to local authority for planning and property development control purposes
Specify resurvey of set back lines, not HWM boundaries of land parcels
This research is based on the theoretical framework of Williamson et al (2010) called the land management paradigm. Land management is understood to embrace four land administration functions: land tenure, value, use and development.
A further aspect of this theory is an understanding of the rights an owner has in a property (bundle of freehold rights) being only one part of a complex of RRRs, which conjoin all who have an interest in the land. These include development and use rights, restrictions and responsibilities.
Development and use rights are real rights since they attach to the land parcel and not to the owner, even though they are not registered.
Any boundary which limits the extent of use and development rights (such as the HWM or boundaries derived from it) is included in this framework and hence the interpretation of the legislation in this paper. This interpretation is that determination of boundaries relating to RRR’s is a cadastral function.
As such, we should not attempt to simplify matters by creating a “non-cadastral” HWM for environmental management purposes - the legal position of the HWM affects Rights Restrictions and Responsibilities on land and at sea. The only option is, therefore, to consider it to be in nature and application, a cadastral boundary.
Land Rights at the sea shore are limited by the HWM and thus the HWM position is necessarily cadastral
The bundle of rights inshore is reduced in accordance with new coastal zone boundaries. Some of these are defined in terms of a setback from the HWM.
This is not a traditional parcel boundary as would be created with subdivision/consolidation of land, but is akin to a servitude or lease which defines the extent of application of differing property rights.
Coastal zone boundaries are thus also cadastral.
Determination of the HWM and any derived coastal zones is not necessarily a simple task and needs to be defensible in a court of law.
Coastal zone boundaries a set distance from the HWM are to be denoted on zoning maps in order that the public may ascertain their location with respect to cadastral boundaries.
It would be procedurally incorrect for a PLS to establish an offset from a boundary not surveyed by a PLS, since property rights are affected.
Only in the case of current cadastral boundaries being chosen as coastal zone boundaries should this be relaxed – in such a case, the noting of the position coincides with a cadastral boundary already surveyed by a PLS.
The Registrar notes in the register that the HWM has been surveyed
would the R be happy to do this if the boundary is not surveyed or surveyed by an incompetent person?
If the task is not conducted by a PLS in terms of the LSA, there is no alternative mechanism to judge or control such a survey or who executes it.
Adjustment of the spatial aspects of land ownership is the preserve of a PLSs for good reason. This is in order that the rights of all interested and affected persons can be considered and protected without fear or favour, with authority and good judgement, and in order that the adjustment benefits from the execution of specific skills and knowledge.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR should determine the HWM for the purposes of the ICMA in all cases