SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  8
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
NONPROFIT INVESTOR
I N D E P E N D E N T R E S E A R C H F O R P H I L A N T H R O P Y
[Type text]
SUMMARY
Children’s Literacy Initiative (“CLI”) is a nonprofit that works directly
with teachers and educators to improve learning environments with the
goal of advancing literacy achievement for disadvantaged children. CLI
invests in schools by providing training and coaching to teachers and
administrators while also supplying quality children’s books.
STRENGTHS
▲ Clear strategic plan. CLI has a distinct mission statement with
strategic goals through 2015 emphasizing their commitment to long-
term educational development. Their strategic plan is highlighted by
their focused approach on professional development and providing
effective evidence-based literacy strategies for schools, specifically pre-
kindergarten through 3rd
grade.
▲ Evidence-based impact. CLI provides metrics to measure their
impact on schools. In 2011, they disclosed metrics such as coaching
hours delivered, schools served, students impacted, number of people
receiving materials, coaching, or training, and number of teachers,
instructors, and principals coached. However, in order to understand
the impact of CLI’s programs over time, it would behoove the
organization to disclose these metrics on an annual basis.
▲ MELI program. CLI’s landmark program, which has received funding
from the U.S. Department of Education (“DOE”), represents a unique
opportunity to validate CLI’s model and show that exemplary teaching
is “observable, measurable, replicable, and scalable.”
▲ Significant expansion opportunity. CLI has received a large number
of grants and contributions over the last two years, particularly from
the DOE and other large funders such as Target. CLI’s financial strength
should put it in a good position to continue to expand its presence and
implement the MELI program.
CAUTIONS
● Limited impact studies in the last few years. CLI’s most recent
relevant impact studies have been in 2008 and 2010. Given the
continued development of the model classroom and the
implementation of the MELI program, further studies will be essential in
evaluating the future success of these programs.
● Potential lag in expected revenue. CLI’s costs have increased
dramatically as it expands and implements the MELI program. It will be
important to track and understand whether this will garner increased
grants and contributions in order to sustain this growth.
RECOMMENDATION: BUY
CLI has a proven track record and impact model focused on professional
development and investment in classrooms. Recent funding from the
DOE underscores this model and provides the opportunity for significant
expansion. Further studies on the MELI program will be integral in
highlighting its positive impact.
Children’s Literacy
Initiative
Nonprofit Investor Rating:
BUY
Mission Statement
To work with teachers to transform
instruction so that children can become
powerful readers, writers, and thinkers.
Financial Overview
$ in MM, Fiscal Year Ended June 30
2009 2010 2011 2012
Revenue & Support $6.1 $6.4 $10.4 $10.1
Operating Expenses $6.7 $5.9 $6.7 $11.3
% of Total Expenses:
Program 86.3% 85.5% 83.0% 85.7%
Administrative 6.8% 6.0% 8.7% 7.0%
Fundraising 6.9% 8.5% 8.4% 7.3%
Year Founded: 1988
Contact Details
Children’s Literacy Initiative
2314 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
215.561.4676
www.cliontheweb.org
EIN: 23-2515768
Analyst: Kabeer Aziz
Peer Review: Michael D. Ojunga, Rainbow
Wong
Publication Date
May 7, 2013
Nonprofit Investor Research | nonprofitinvestor.org
Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 2
OVERVIEW OF CLI’s ACTIVITIES
CLI has coached teachers since 1988, impacting over 1 million children during this time. The organization currently
provides professional development services to in-need classrooms between pre-k through 3rd
grade across 9 eastern
states and Washington D.C. The goal of these programs is “to close the gap in literacy achievement between
disadvantaged children and their more affluent peers.” CLI believes that early literacy development in the classroom
leads to better results in higher education and, in turn, lifelong success. The organization’s approach focuses on
equipping teachers with the strategies and tools needed to provide quality education to students.
Approach
 Establishing model classrooms
 Training / coaching sessions
 Providing high-quality children’s books
 Helping teachers create a literacy-rich environment and improve classroom management skills
Model Classrooms and the MELI Program
At its core, CLI’s approach begins with the model classroom. CLI works to establish model classrooms in schools with
low-income neighborhoods. By providing model classroom teachers with sustained training in addition to quality books
and literacy materials, CLI creates a supportive learning environment that encourages higher expectations for both
teachers and students. The concept is based on the idea that the effect of the model classroom will permeate
throughout other classrooms as well. Teachers from within the building are encouraged to visit and gain insight into
best-practice teaching strategies. Model classrooms not only support their own students, but they also set an exemplary
teaching standard that benefits the other students and teachers within the school. Within each school, CLI aims to have
one model classroom per grade (kindergarten through 3rd
grade). This helps foster continuity in educational
development over the long term. Additionally, every model classroom teacher is part of the CLI model classroom
network, which provides a sustainable framework for continued development. They become part of a collaborative
learning community and attend monthly leadership development meetings, with the intent to produce “teacher-leaders”
within their respective schools.
As part of its initiative to institute model classrooms across schools, CLI launched a major project in
2010 known as Modeling Exemplary Literacy Instruction (MELI). MELI was one of 49 projects (out of
approximately 1,700 applicants) chosen by the U.S. Department of Education to receive a grant from
its Investing in Innovation (i3) fund, which is meant to strengthen public education and student
achievement. Over the course of the five year grant period, CLI plans to work with over 460 teachers
in 39 randomly selected public schools in Camden, Chicago, Newark and Philadelphia. As part of the program, CLI will
train teachers, establish one model classroom in each applicable grade of every school, and collaborate with teachers to
ensure that each school develops the capacity to sustain high-quality literacy instruction over the long term.
MELI Project Locations
City State # of Schools
Newark New Jersey 15
Camden New Jersey 6
Philadelphia Pennsylvania 10
Chicago Illinois 8
Total 39
Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 3
Professional Development Services
CLI training and coaching programs help teachers implement instructional practices and promote a culture of literacy
within the classroom. While these programs supplement the model classrooms, training and coaching sessions also
serve teachers in schools that may not have exposure to model classrooms yet. CLI coaching involves one-on-one
meetings, small group meetings, grade level meetings within schools, and a guided visit to a CLI model classroom. CLI
helps create a learning community among teachers to better serve students in their schools.
Other Services / Programs
National Conferences: CLI holds National Conferences which provide a means for educators to come together and
present ideas, listen to influential speakers, and collaborate with one another on effective teaching strategies.
CLI Compass: An online tool that supplements the professional development services offered to teachers
Teacher Pipeline Project: Implemented in 2009-2010, CLI placed 7 student teachers in urban kindergarten and 1st
grade
Model Classrooms. CLI believes that investment in teachers is a key component to literacy success and this project
provides an opportunity to learn best-practice teaching strategies firsthand before becoming full time instructors.
Products: CLI offers a wide range of products aimed to supplement quality literacy education. Major products include:
 Message Time Plus: Modeled writing and shared reading instructional program for pre-kindergarten through
second grade
 Blueprint for Early Literacy: Comprehensive pre-kindergarten curriculum
PROGRAM RESULTS AND EFFECTIVENESS
CLI uses a number of metrics to track its services and impact each year. In 2011, CLI had the following impact:
 Coaching hours delivered: 15,210
 Schools served: 350
 Students impacted: 48,300
 People receiving materials, coaching, or training: 1,725
 Teachers / Principal / Instructors coached: 755
Several impact studies have also been done to validate the effectiveness of CLI’s programs:
 In January 2010, the OMG Center for Collaborative Learning published a study on kindergarten and first grade
model classrooms that concluded CLI’s initiative added value to schools and significantly improved student
literacy scores
 The University of Pennsylvania’s Center for High Impact Philanthropy published a report in 2008 – Pathways to
Student Success: A Guide to Translating Good Intentions into Meaningful – which identified CLI as an exemplary
institution in improving literacy instruction and “a charitable organization where invested dollars do the most
good”
 A study from 1999 looks at CLI’s Philadelphia Kindergarten Project which provided 1)kindergarten teachers in
two city schools with 500 children’s books and 30 hours of training; 2) kindergarten teachers in two other city
schools with the books, but no training; and 3) two other classrooms with no books or training (control site). The
study found that literacy development of urban kindergarten children can be accelerated with a better quality
literacy environment
 Studies conducted in 1995-1996 by Dr. Virginia A. Walter evaluated the short term outcome of CLI training
sessions. The studies found that these training sessions fostered several positive outcomes including effective
Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 4
integration of books into the curriculum, stimulation of classroom literacy environment, and the involvement of
parents in literacy activities
 Studies conducted in 1998-1999 evaluated the effect of CLI teaching practices and environments on pre-
kindergarten classrooms in Baltimore and found that CLI’s programs made a tangible difference in raising
achievement on assessments of reading readiness in Baltimore children perceived to be “at-risk”
The MELI Program will also be a key piece to validating CLI’s success. The results of the project are externally evaluated
by American Institutes for Research, which is conducting a randomized controlled trial to measure the impact of CLI’s
work on student success and teacher instruction.
TRANSPARENCY
CLI’s website is fairly comprehensive providing an overview of all programs and services as well as various impact studies
evaluating the effect of CLI’s initiatives. The 2011 annual report was also accessible via website and yearly Audit and 990
forms were available through online resources as well. While management did respond to requests for additional
financial information, they were not particularly responsive for a call to cover some basic diligence items.
Additionally, it would be helpful to understand how exactly CLI partners with schools. With the newly launched MELI
program, it is apparent that the Department of Education will have some degree of influence as to how the program is
implemented, and that the 39 schools were randomly chosen within Newark, Camden, Philadelphia and Chicago.
However, with respect to CLI’s other model classrooms, it is unclear how they choose specific schools within low-income
neighborhoods and how school district contracts are won. It would also be helpful to understand how certain teachers
are chosen to become model classroom teachers. Understanding this would provide better insight into how CLI operates
and how they can capitalize on potential expansion opportunities going forward.
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW (fiscal year end June 30, 2012)
REVENUE
From 2009-2010, CLI saw limited revenue growth, with the majority of revenue coming from School District Contracts in
2009 and 2010. In 2011, CLI experienced a 62.4% increase in overall revenue largely due to a major jump in Grants and
Contributions. A major driving factor for this increase was the 5 year federal grant of $21.7 million that CLI received
from the Department of Education in August 2010 (related to the MELI initiative). For 2011, CLI recorded $2.6 million in
revenue from the DOE grant. In 2012, revenue was down slightly due to decreased school district contracts. A higher
proportion of CLI’s revenue is now supported by grants and contributions.
Revenue Mix Over Time
$ in MM
2012 Revenue Mix DOE Grant (Year Revenue Received)
$5.9 $6.1 $6.4
$10.4
$10.1
4.8%
62.4%
(2.8%)
5.6% 3.8%
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
(10.0%)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
School District Contracts Grants and Contributions All Other Income Y/Y Growth
`
Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 5
EXPENSES
From 2008-2011, CLI did not experience significant fluctuations in expenses. Through 2011, CLI exhibited cost control
and significant operating efficiency as total expenses, as a percent of total revenue, decreased dramatically to 64.9% of
revenue. However in 2012, expenses increased to 112.0% of revenue. Given CLI’s larger scale operations with the roll
out of the MELI program, administrative, fundraising and program expenses all increased significantly. However,
approximately 90% of the total nominal increase came from program expenses. The program expense increase can be
largely attributed to payroll, program consultants, professional
fees, books and program materials. Given that the MELI program is
still in its initial stage, CLI may be seeing a lag in expected revenue
versus program expenses. Assuming greater national attention
from the MELI program and further revenue from the DOE grant,
CLI should be able to become more cost efficient again.
Expense Breakout Over Time 2011 Cost Per Beneficiary (based on program expenses)1
$ in MM
Detailed Financial Information (Tax Basis)
1
Based on CLI Annual Report; 2012 report not yet available
17.6%
82.2%
0.2%
School District Contracts Grants and Contributions Other Income
12.1%
34.0%
53.9%
2011 2012 2013-2015
$6.1
$6.7
$5.9
$6.7
0.886.5% 86.3%
85.5% 83.0%
85.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Program Administrative Fundraising Program Expense % of Total
$15,964
$7,401
$3,239
$367 $116
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
Per School Per Person
Coached
Per Persons
Served
Per Coaching
Hour
Per Student
Impacted
Program Expenses
2011 2012 % Change
Payroll and Related $1,827,848 $2,425,777 32.7%
Program Consultants 1,630,133 2,549,413 56.4%
Professional Fees 386,855 1,637,337 323.2%
Books 764,150 1,413,044 84.9%
Program Materials 375,900 841,950 124.0%
Overhead and Other 602,547 803,012 33.3%
Total $5,587,433 $9,670,533 73.1%
Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 6
Fiscal Year Ended June 30 2009 2010 2011 2012
Revenue and Expenses
Operating Revenue:
School District Contracts $3,393,044 $3,731,177 $2,060,353 $1,774,618
Grants and Contributions 2,645,437 2,638,023 8,299,133 8,290,971
Product Sales 4,239 5,168 619 1,021
Investment Income 47,737 10,426 11,527 14,228
Miscellaneous Income 604 595 476 365
Total Support and Revenues $6,091,061 $6,385,389 $10,372,108 $10,081,203
% Growth 3.8% 4.8% 62.4% (2.8%)
Expenses:
Program $5,781,629 $5,045,538 $5,587,433 $9,670,533
Administrative 453,182 354,526 582,933 792,694
Fundraising 465,162 499,494 565,362 824,103
Total Expenses: $6,699,973 $5,899,558 $6,735,728 $11,287,330
% of Revenue 110.0% 92.4% 64.9% 112.0%
KEY BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
Cash and Cash Equivalents $1,015,687 $1,368,746 $2,998,904 $3,100,607
Grants Receivable 393,500 600,500 3,235,992 2,086,000
Accounts Receivable 352,166 801,108 226,561 277,774
Inventory 559,777 362,528 313,537 444,121
Plant, Property & Equipment 497,679 405,482 339,617 343,870
Other Assets 56,820 52,175 88,699 71,526
Total Assets 2,875,629 3,590,539 7,203,310 6,323,898
Accounts Payable 311,559 537,718 528,444 863,453
Deferred Revenue 21,920 24,840 10,505 2,211
Total Liabilities 333,479 562,558 538,949 865,664
Net Assets 2,542,150 3,027,981 6,664,361 5,458,234
Program Costs as a % of Total Expenses 86.3% 85.5% 83.0% 85.7%
Administrative Costs as a % of Total Expenses 6.8% 6.0% 8.7% 7.0%
Fundraising Costs as a % of Total Expenses 6.9% 8.5% 8.4% 7.3%
Source: IRS Form 990 (Tax Acccounting Basis)
Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 7
OTHER THIRD PARTY RATINGS
 As of May 2012, Charity Navigator rates CLI 4 out of 4 stars with a score of 60.83 out of a possible 70.00. Since
2003, CLI has consistently been rated between 3 to 4 stars (except for July 2005 when it received 2 stars), and
this is its first 4 star rating since May 2008.
 GuideStar rates CLI 5 out of 5 stars based on the average rating from 11 personal reviews. GuideStar also gave
“checks” to CLI in all major criteria categories which include transparency, IRS registration and availability of
financial data, 990 forms, mission objectives and an impact statement.
KEY PEOPLE
Kelly Hunter Ed.D. – Executive Director
Kelly Hunter has been Executive Director of CLI since December 2011. Prior to that role, she spent 4 years as CLI’s
Director of Professional Development. Before joining CLI, she worked as a Literacy Fellow and adjunct professor at the
University of Pennsylvania as well as Project Manager at the University’s National Center on Adult Literacy. Kelly holds a
Bachelor of Science from Drexel University and a Master’s Degree and Ed.D. from the University of Pennsylvania.
Cameron Voss – Deputy Director
Cameron Voss joined CLI in 2000, prior to which she was the Director of Development at Frankford Group Ministry and a
Research Assistant at Research for Action. Additionally, she worked as an adult literacy and GED teacher at The
Lighthouse and Lutheran Settlement House. Cameron holds a BA from Swarthmore College and an MA from Temple
University. She also received a certificate in Executive Leadership from Bryn Mawr College Graduate School of Social
Work and Social Research.
GET INVOLVED
You can support Children’s Literacy Initiative with a donation by using the following link:
http://www.cliontheweb.org/content/donate-online
Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 8
DISCLOSURES
Kabeer Aziz certifies that he does not have any affiliation with Children’s Literacy Initiative and has never made a
donation to the organization. Additionally, Kabeer Aziz has not supported directly competing organizations in a greater
capacity than a nominal donation. NPI analysts and NPI as an organization do not receive any form of compensation
from reviewed charities.
This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation for donations. While the reliability of
information contained in this report has been assessed by NPI, NPI makes no representation as to its accuracy or
completeness, except with respect to the Disclosure Section of the report. Any opinions expressed herein reflect our
judgment as of the date of the materials and are subject to change without notice. NPI has no obligation to update,
modify or amend any report or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any
opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate, or if research on
the subject organization is withdrawn.
Opinions and recommendations in our reports do not take into account specific reader circumstances, objectives, or
needs. The recipients of our reports must make their own independent decisions regarding any organization mentioned
by NPI.
ABOUT NONPROFIT INVESTOR
Nonprofit Investor is a nonprofit organization with the mission of improving philanthropic capital allocation and
nonprofit effectiveness through research and analysis. NPI brings together volunteers with professional due diligence
skills to produce independent, in‐depth evaluations of nonprofits. NPI research is available for free, public download
here: www.nonprofitinvestor.org/research. To suggest a charity for NPI to review or to apply as a volunteer, please
contact us: www.nonprofitinvestor.org/contact. NPI is a tax‐exempt charity under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (EIN: 45‐3627609). Follow Nonprofit Investor on Twitter: @nonprofitinvest

Contenu connexe

Tendances

The Local Control Funding Formula: Opportunities for Advancing STEM Learning
The Local Control Funding Formula: Opportunities for Advancing STEM LearningThe Local Control Funding Formula: Opportunities for Advancing STEM Learning
The Local Control Funding Formula: Opportunities for Advancing STEM LearningCalifornia STEM Learning Network
 
Vets Services Strategic Plan Progress Report
Vets Services Strategic Plan Progress ReportVets Services Strategic Plan Progress Report
Vets Services Strategic Plan Progress ReportJason Schlegel
 
Birmingham City Schools Leadership Academy
Birmingham City Schools Leadership AcademyBirmingham City Schools Leadership Academy
Birmingham City Schools Leadership AcademyKristina Mapes
 
Meaningful relationships with non profits
Meaningful relationships with non profitsMeaningful relationships with non profits
Meaningful relationships with non profitsNAFCareerAcads
 
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy final
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy  finalEnrollment management as a fiscal strategy  final
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy finalSukhwant Jhaj
 
LCFF ELD
LCFF ELDLCFF ELD
LCFF ELDCASupts
 
Lambda Chi Alpha Strategic Plan for Local Area Alumni Associations
Lambda Chi Alpha Strategic Plan for Local Area Alumni AssociationsLambda Chi Alpha Strategic Plan for Local Area Alumni Associations
Lambda Chi Alpha Strategic Plan for Local Area Alumni AssociationsTroy D. White
 
O'Brien Center Employer Relations Day August 8, 2013
O'Brien Center Employer Relations Day August 8, 2013O'Brien Center Employer Relations Day August 8, 2013
O'Brien Center Employer Relations Day August 8, 2013Stephen Maser
 
TFFT STRATEGIC PLAN EVALUATION
TFFT STRATEGIC PLAN EVALUATIONTFFT STRATEGIC PLAN EVALUATION
TFFT STRATEGIC PLAN EVALUATIONkenoulu
 
Strengthening the Edupreneurship Ecosystem in South Africa 2015 - PRESENTATION
Strengthening the Edupreneurship Ecosystem in South Africa 2015 - PRESENTATIONStrengthening the Edupreneurship Ecosystem in South Africa 2015 - PRESENTATION
Strengthening the Edupreneurship Ecosystem in South Africa 2015 - PRESENTATIONZoraida Velasco
 
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD HoustonNPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD HoustonNonprofit Investor
 
081208 Aaa Year In Review Presentation
081208 Aaa   Year In Review Presentation081208 Aaa   Year In Review Presentation
081208 Aaa Year In Review Presentationbiferguson
 
New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...
New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...
New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...Morgan Noonan
 
The_Dominican_Strategy(Brochure).PDF
The_Dominican_Strategy(Brochure).PDFThe_Dominican_Strategy(Brochure).PDF
The_Dominican_Strategy(Brochure).PDFLuis Calingo
 

Tendances (20)

The Local Control Funding Formula: Opportunities for Advancing STEM Learning
The Local Control Funding Formula: Opportunities for Advancing STEM LearningThe Local Control Funding Formula: Opportunities for Advancing STEM Learning
The Local Control Funding Formula: Opportunities for Advancing STEM Learning
 
Why Junior Achievement
Why Junior AchievementWhy Junior Achievement
Why Junior Achievement
 
Eveanna's Portfolio
Eveanna's PortfolioEveanna's Portfolio
Eveanna's Portfolio
 
NPI Evaluation of CFY
NPI Evaluation of CFYNPI Evaluation of CFY
NPI Evaluation of CFY
 
Vets Services Strategic Plan Progress Report
Vets Services Strategic Plan Progress ReportVets Services Strategic Plan Progress Report
Vets Services Strategic Plan Progress Report
 
Birmingham City Schools Leadership Academy
Birmingham City Schools Leadership AcademyBirmingham City Schools Leadership Academy
Birmingham City Schools Leadership Academy
 
Meaningful relationships with non profits
Meaningful relationships with non profitsMeaningful relationships with non profits
Meaningful relationships with non profits
 
Real Play HCD
Real Play HCD Real Play HCD
Real Play HCD
 
Making the Case
Making the CaseMaking the Case
Making the Case
 
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy final
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy  finalEnrollment management as a fiscal strategy  final
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy final
 
LCFF ELD
LCFF ELDLCFF ELD
LCFF ELD
 
Lambda Chi Alpha Strategic Plan for Local Area Alumni Associations
Lambda Chi Alpha Strategic Plan for Local Area Alumni AssociationsLambda Chi Alpha Strategic Plan for Local Area Alumni Associations
Lambda Chi Alpha Strategic Plan for Local Area Alumni Associations
 
MESSY Flore-Anne - 2015 Symposium on Financial Education in Tokyo
MESSY Flore-Anne - 2015 Symposium on Financial Education in TokyoMESSY Flore-Anne - 2015 Symposium on Financial Education in Tokyo
MESSY Flore-Anne - 2015 Symposium on Financial Education in Tokyo
 
O'Brien Center Employer Relations Day August 8, 2013
O'Brien Center Employer Relations Day August 8, 2013O'Brien Center Employer Relations Day August 8, 2013
O'Brien Center Employer Relations Day August 8, 2013
 
TFFT STRATEGIC PLAN EVALUATION
TFFT STRATEGIC PLAN EVALUATIONTFFT STRATEGIC PLAN EVALUATION
TFFT STRATEGIC PLAN EVALUATION
 
Strengthening the Edupreneurship Ecosystem in South Africa 2015 - PRESENTATION
Strengthening the Edupreneurship Ecosystem in South Africa 2015 - PRESENTATIONStrengthening the Edupreneurship Ecosystem in South Africa 2015 - PRESENTATION
Strengthening the Edupreneurship Ecosystem in South Africa 2015 - PRESENTATION
 
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD HoustonNPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
 
081208 Aaa Year In Review Presentation
081208 Aaa   Year In Review Presentation081208 Aaa   Year In Review Presentation
081208 Aaa Year In Review Presentation
 
New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...
New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...
New & Next Webinar Series | Top Facilities and Operations Challenges Facing C...
 
The_Dominican_Strategy(Brochure).PDF
The_Dominican_Strategy(Brochure).PDFThe_Dominican_Strategy(Brochure).PDF
The_Dominican_Strategy(Brochure).PDF
 

Similaire à Helping Children Become Powerful Readers

School Leadership in Chicago_Baseline Report
School Leadership in Chicago_Baseline ReportSchool Leadership in Chicago_Baseline Report
School Leadership in Chicago_Baseline ReportLauren Rapp
 
BRIDGE-Newsletter-Quarter-3-2015
BRIDGE-Newsletter-Quarter-3-2015BRIDGE-Newsletter-Quarter-3-2015
BRIDGE-Newsletter-Quarter-3-2015Linford Molaodi
 
Signature assignment 570
Signature assignment 570Signature assignment 570
Signature assignment 570EricaLJonesMAEd
 
Green simple-article-school-newsletter
Green simple-article-school-newsletterGreen simple-article-school-newsletter
Green simple-article-school-newsletterAGGELIKI KARANASIOU
 
High Quality And Ongoing Professional Development
High Quality And Ongoing Professional DevelopmentHigh Quality And Ongoing Professional Development
High Quality And Ongoing Professional DevelopmentKathyRees
 
Presentation Action Research on Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao
Presentation Action Research on Edukasyon sa PagpapakataoPresentation Action Research on Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao
Presentation Action Research on Edukasyon sa PagpapakataoEricksonCalison2
 
Comprehensive Leadership Development, By Mike Heffner and Sid Haro
Comprehensive Leadership Development, By Mike Heffner and Sid HaroComprehensive Leadership Development, By Mike Heffner and Sid Haro
Comprehensive Leadership Development, By Mike Heffner and Sid HaroSid Haro
 
D. Miller 2017 Resume
D. Miller 2017 ResumeD. Miller 2017 Resume
D. Miller 2017 ResumeDawn Miller
 
Teach First- Asia Pacific Cities Summit session
Teach First- Asia Pacific Cities Summit sessionTeach First- Asia Pacific Cities Summit session
Teach First- Asia Pacific Cities Summit sessionSocial Innovation Exchange
 
M.Ed Teacher Education's Topic-Explain concept of teacher education and discu...
M.Ed Teacher Education's Topic-Explain concept of teacher education and discu...M.Ed Teacher Education's Topic-Explain concept of teacher education and discu...
M.Ed Teacher Education's Topic-Explain concept of teacher education and discu...fatima roshan
 
FYE Program 2012 thru May 2014 PDF
FYE Program 2012 thru  May 2014 PDFFYE Program 2012 thru  May 2014 PDF
FYE Program 2012 thru May 2014 PDFCedric Steele
 
Research and Implementation learning together in Newham
Research and Implementation learning together in NewhamResearch and Implementation learning together in Newham
Research and Implementation learning together in NewhamDr Julian Grenier
 

Similaire à Helping Children Become Powerful Readers (20)

School Leadership in Chicago_Baseline Report
School Leadership in Chicago_Baseline ReportSchool Leadership in Chicago_Baseline Report
School Leadership in Chicago_Baseline Report
 
BRIDGE-Newsletter-Quarter-3-2015
BRIDGE-Newsletter-Quarter-3-2015BRIDGE-Newsletter-Quarter-3-2015
BRIDGE-Newsletter-Quarter-3-2015
 
Signature assignment 570
Signature assignment 570Signature assignment 570
Signature assignment 570
 
Maed educ 214 educ planning
Maed educ 214 educ planningMaed educ 214 educ planning
Maed educ 214 educ planning
 
Green simple-article-school-newsletter
Green simple-article-school-newsletterGreen simple-article-school-newsletter
Green simple-article-school-newsletter
 
Teach for India
Teach for IndiaTeach for India
Teach for India
 
The survival of school financing management in COVID-19 pandemic
The survival of school financing management in COVID-19 pandemicThe survival of school financing management in COVID-19 pandemic
The survival of school financing management in COVID-19 pandemic
 
High Quality And Ongoing Professional Development
High Quality And Ongoing Professional DevelopmentHigh Quality And Ongoing Professional Development
High Quality And Ongoing Professional Development
 
My-Report.pptx
My-Report.pptxMy-Report.pptx
My-Report.pptx
 
Intro to the IMYC
Intro to the IMYCIntro to the IMYC
Intro to the IMYC
 
Presentation Action Research on Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao
Presentation Action Research on Edukasyon sa PagpapakataoPresentation Action Research on Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao
Presentation Action Research on Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao
 
Comprehensive Leadership Development, By Mike Heffner and Sid Haro
Comprehensive Leadership Development, By Mike Heffner and Sid HaroComprehensive Leadership Development, By Mike Heffner and Sid Haro
Comprehensive Leadership Development, By Mike Heffner and Sid Haro
 
D. Miller 2017 Resume
D. Miller 2017 ResumeD. Miller 2017 Resume
D. Miller 2017 Resume
 
Teach First- Asia Pacific Cities Summit session
Teach First- Asia Pacific Cities Summit sessionTeach First- Asia Pacific Cities Summit session
Teach First- Asia Pacific Cities Summit session
 
M.Ed Teacher Education's Topic-Explain concept of teacher education and discu...
M.Ed Teacher Education's Topic-Explain concept of teacher education and discu...M.Ed Teacher Education's Topic-Explain concept of teacher education and discu...
M.Ed Teacher Education's Topic-Explain concept of teacher education and discu...
 
FYE Program 2012 thru May 2014 PDF
FYE Program 2012 thru  May 2014 PDFFYE Program 2012 thru  May 2014 PDF
FYE Program 2012 thru May 2014 PDF
 
costatine
costatinecostatine
costatine
 
IB school in Bangalore.pdf
IB school in Bangalore.pdfIB school in Bangalore.pdf
IB school in Bangalore.pdf
 
Research and Implementation learning together in Newham
Research and Implementation learning together in NewhamResearch and Implementation learning together in Newham
Research and Implementation learning together in Newham
 
IB school in Bangalore.pdf
IB school in Bangalore.pdfIB school in Bangalore.pdf
IB school in Bangalore.pdf
 

Plus de Nonprofit Investor

NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson CenterNPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson CenterNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth ProgramsNPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth ProgramsNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door VenturesNPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door VenturesNonprofit Investor
 
NPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: waterNPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: waterNonprofit Investor
 
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating SummaryPhiladelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating SummaryNonprofit Investor
 
Delancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating SummaryDelancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating SummaryNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for YouthNPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for YouthNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College PossibleNPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College PossibleNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science InitiativeNPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science InitiativeNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to ReadNPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to ReadNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox FoundationNPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox FoundationNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpringNPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpringNonprofit Investor
 

Plus de Nonprofit Investor (20)

NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson CenterNPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
 
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth ProgramsNPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
 
NPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door VenturesNPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
 
Charity: water Rating Summary
Charity: water Rating SummaryCharity: water Rating Summary
Charity: water Rating Summary
 
NPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: waterNPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: water
 
Do-All, Inc. Rating Summary
Do-All, Inc. Rating SummaryDo-All, Inc. Rating Summary
Do-All, Inc. Rating Summary
 
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating SummaryPhiladelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
 
Year Up Rating Summary
Year Up Rating SummaryYear Up Rating Summary
Year Up Rating Summary
 
Delancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating SummaryDelancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
 
iMentor Rating Summary
iMentor Rating SummaryiMentor Rating Summary
iMentor Rating Summary
 
First Book Rating Summary
First Book Rating SummaryFirst Book Rating Summary
First Book Rating Summary
 
NPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for YouthNPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
 
NPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College PossibleNPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College Possible
 
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science InitiativeNPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
 
NPI Evaluation of JobTrain
NPI Evaluation of JobTrainNPI Evaluation of JobTrain
NPI Evaluation of JobTrain
 
NPI Evaluation of HOBY
NPI Evaluation of HOBYNPI Evaluation of HOBY
NPI Evaluation of HOBY
 
NPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to ReadNPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to Read
 
NPI Evaluation of NMFA
NPI Evaluation of NMFANPI Evaluation of NMFA
NPI Evaluation of NMFA
 
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox FoundationNPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
 
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpringNPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
 

Dernier

ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4MiaBumagat1
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...JhezDiaz1
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxCarlos105
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designMIPLM
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfphamnguyenenglishnb
 
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceRoles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceSamikshaHamane
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxHumphrey A Beña
 
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for ParentsChoosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parentsnavabharathschool99
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Jisc
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomnelietumpap1
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxthorishapillay1
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...Postal Advocate Inc.
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxAnupkumar Sharma
 

Dernier (20)

ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
 
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceRoles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
 
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for ParentsChoosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
 
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxFINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
 

Helping Children Become Powerful Readers

  • 1. NONPROFIT INVESTOR I N D E P E N D E N T R E S E A R C H F O R P H I L A N T H R O P Y [Type text] SUMMARY Children’s Literacy Initiative (“CLI”) is a nonprofit that works directly with teachers and educators to improve learning environments with the goal of advancing literacy achievement for disadvantaged children. CLI invests in schools by providing training and coaching to teachers and administrators while also supplying quality children’s books. STRENGTHS ▲ Clear strategic plan. CLI has a distinct mission statement with strategic goals through 2015 emphasizing their commitment to long- term educational development. Their strategic plan is highlighted by their focused approach on professional development and providing effective evidence-based literacy strategies for schools, specifically pre- kindergarten through 3rd grade. ▲ Evidence-based impact. CLI provides metrics to measure their impact on schools. In 2011, they disclosed metrics such as coaching hours delivered, schools served, students impacted, number of people receiving materials, coaching, or training, and number of teachers, instructors, and principals coached. However, in order to understand the impact of CLI’s programs over time, it would behoove the organization to disclose these metrics on an annual basis. ▲ MELI program. CLI’s landmark program, which has received funding from the U.S. Department of Education (“DOE”), represents a unique opportunity to validate CLI’s model and show that exemplary teaching is “observable, measurable, replicable, and scalable.” ▲ Significant expansion opportunity. CLI has received a large number of grants and contributions over the last two years, particularly from the DOE and other large funders such as Target. CLI’s financial strength should put it in a good position to continue to expand its presence and implement the MELI program. CAUTIONS ● Limited impact studies in the last few years. CLI’s most recent relevant impact studies have been in 2008 and 2010. Given the continued development of the model classroom and the implementation of the MELI program, further studies will be essential in evaluating the future success of these programs. ● Potential lag in expected revenue. CLI’s costs have increased dramatically as it expands and implements the MELI program. It will be important to track and understand whether this will garner increased grants and contributions in order to sustain this growth. RECOMMENDATION: BUY CLI has a proven track record and impact model focused on professional development and investment in classrooms. Recent funding from the DOE underscores this model and provides the opportunity for significant expansion. Further studies on the MELI program will be integral in highlighting its positive impact. Children’s Literacy Initiative Nonprofit Investor Rating: BUY Mission Statement To work with teachers to transform instruction so that children can become powerful readers, writers, and thinkers. Financial Overview $ in MM, Fiscal Year Ended June 30 2009 2010 2011 2012 Revenue & Support $6.1 $6.4 $10.4 $10.1 Operating Expenses $6.7 $5.9 $6.7 $11.3 % of Total Expenses: Program 86.3% 85.5% 83.0% 85.7% Administrative 6.8% 6.0% 8.7% 7.0% Fundraising 6.9% 8.5% 8.4% 7.3% Year Founded: 1988 Contact Details Children’s Literacy Initiative 2314 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 215.561.4676 www.cliontheweb.org EIN: 23-2515768 Analyst: Kabeer Aziz Peer Review: Michael D. Ojunga, Rainbow Wong Publication Date May 7, 2013 Nonprofit Investor Research | nonprofitinvestor.org
  • 2. Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 2 OVERVIEW OF CLI’s ACTIVITIES CLI has coached teachers since 1988, impacting over 1 million children during this time. The organization currently provides professional development services to in-need classrooms between pre-k through 3rd grade across 9 eastern states and Washington D.C. The goal of these programs is “to close the gap in literacy achievement between disadvantaged children and their more affluent peers.” CLI believes that early literacy development in the classroom leads to better results in higher education and, in turn, lifelong success. The organization’s approach focuses on equipping teachers with the strategies and tools needed to provide quality education to students. Approach  Establishing model classrooms  Training / coaching sessions  Providing high-quality children’s books  Helping teachers create a literacy-rich environment and improve classroom management skills Model Classrooms and the MELI Program At its core, CLI’s approach begins with the model classroom. CLI works to establish model classrooms in schools with low-income neighborhoods. By providing model classroom teachers with sustained training in addition to quality books and literacy materials, CLI creates a supportive learning environment that encourages higher expectations for both teachers and students. The concept is based on the idea that the effect of the model classroom will permeate throughout other classrooms as well. Teachers from within the building are encouraged to visit and gain insight into best-practice teaching strategies. Model classrooms not only support their own students, but they also set an exemplary teaching standard that benefits the other students and teachers within the school. Within each school, CLI aims to have one model classroom per grade (kindergarten through 3rd grade). This helps foster continuity in educational development over the long term. Additionally, every model classroom teacher is part of the CLI model classroom network, which provides a sustainable framework for continued development. They become part of a collaborative learning community and attend monthly leadership development meetings, with the intent to produce “teacher-leaders” within their respective schools. As part of its initiative to institute model classrooms across schools, CLI launched a major project in 2010 known as Modeling Exemplary Literacy Instruction (MELI). MELI was one of 49 projects (out of approximately 1,700 applicants) chosen by the U.S. Department of Education to receive a grant from its Investing in Innovation (i3) fund, which is meant to strengthen public education and student achievement. Over the course of the five year grant period, CLI plans to work with over 460 teachers in 39 randomly selected public schools in Camden, Chicago, Newark and Philadelphia. As part of the program, CLI will train teachers, establish one model classroom in each applicable grade of every school, and collaborate with teachers to ensure that each school develops the capacity to sustain high-quality literacy instruction over the long term. MELI Project Locations City State # of Schools Newark New Jersey 15 Camden New Jersey 6 Philadelphia Pennsylvania 10 Chicago Illinois 8 Total 39
  • 3. Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 3 Professional Development Services CLI training and coaching programs help teachers implement instructional practices and promote a culture of literacy within the classroom. While these programs supplement the model classrooms, training and coaching sessions also serve teachers in schools that may not have exposure to model classrooms yet. CLI coaching involves one-on-one meetings, small group meetings, grade level meetings within schools, and a guided visit to a CLI model classroom. CLI helps create a learning community among teachers to better serve students in their schools. Other Services / Programs National Conferences: CLI holds National Conferences which provide a means for educators to come together and present ideas, listen to influential speakers, and collaborate with one another on effective teaching strategies. CLI Compass: An online tool that supplements the professional development services offered to teachers Teacher Pipeline Project: Implemented in 2009-2010, CLI placed 7 student teachers in urban kindergarten and 1st grade Model Classrooms. CLI believes that investment in teachers is a key component to literacy success and this project provides an opportunity to learn best-practice teaching strategies firsthand before becoming full time instructors. Products: CLI offers a wide range of products aimed to supplement quality literacy education. Major products include:  Message Time Plus: Modeled writing and shared reading instructional program for pre-kindergarten through second grade  Blueprint for Early Literacy: Comprehensive pre-kindergarten curriculum PROGRAM RESULTS AND EFFECTIVENESS CLI uses a number of metrics to track its services and impact each year. In 2011, CLI had the following impact:  Coaching hours delivered: 15,210  Schools served: 350  Students impacted: 48,300  People receiving materials, coaching, or training: 1,725  Teachers / Principal / Instructors coached: 755 Several impact studies have also been done to validate the effectiveness of CLI’s programs:  In January 2010, the OMG Center for Collaborative Learning published a study on kindergarten and first grade model classrooms that concluded CLI’s initiative added value to schools and significantly improved student literacy scores  The University of Pennsylvania’s Center for High Impact Philanthropy published a report in 2008 – Pathways to Student Success: A Guide to Translating Good Intentions into Meaningful – which identified CLI as an exemplary institution in improving literacy instruction and “a charitable organization where invested dollars do the most good”  A study from 1999 looks at CLI’s Philadelphia Kindergarten Project which provided 1)kindergarten teachers in two city schools with 500 children’s books and 30 hours of training; 2) kindergarten teachers in two other city schools with the books, but no training; and 3) two other classrooms with no books or training (control site). The study found that literacy development of urban kindergarten children can be accelerated with a better quality literacy environment  Studies conducted in 1995-1996 by Dr. Virginia A. Walter evaluated the short term outcome of CLI training sessions. The studies found that these training sessions fostered several positive outcomes including effective
  • 4. Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 4 integration of books into the curriculum, stimulation of classroom literacy environment, and the involvement of parents in literacy activities  Studies conducted in 1998-1999 evaluated the effect of CLI teaching practices and environments on pre- kindergarten classrooms in Baltimore and found that CLI’s programs made a tangible difference in raising achievement on assessments of reading readiness in Baltimore children perceived to be “at-risk” The MELI Program will also be a key piece to validating CLI’s success. The results of the project are externally evaluated by American Institutes for Research, which is conducting a randomized controlled trial to measure the impact of CLI’s work on student success and teacher instruction. TRANSPARENCY CLI’s website is fairly comprehensive providing an overview of all programs and services as well as various impact studies evaluating the effect of CLI’s initiatives. The 2011 annual report was also accessible via website and yearly Audit and 990 forms were available through online resources as well. While management did respond to requests for additional financial information, they were not particularly responsive for a call to cover some basic diligence items. Additionally, it would be helpful to understand how exactly CLI partners with schools. With the newly launched MELI program, it is apparent that the Department of Education will have some degree of influence as to how the program is implemented, and that the 39 schools were randomly chosen within Newark, Camden, Philadelphia and Chicago. However, with respect to CLI’s other model classrooms, it is unclear how they choose specific schools within low-income neighborhoods and how school district contracts are won. It would also be helpful to understand how certain teachers are chosen to become model classroom teachers. Understanding this would provide better insight into how CLI operates and how they can capitalize on potential expansion opportunities going forward. FINANCIAL OVERVIEW (fiscal year end June 30, 2012) REVENUE From 2009-2010, CLI saw limited revenue growth, with the majority of revenue coming from School District Contracts in 2009 and 2010. In 2011, CLI experienced a 62.4% increase in overall revenue largely due to a major jump in Grants and Contributions. A major driving factor for this increase was the 5 year federal grant of $21.7 million that CLI received from the Department of Education in August 2010 (related to the MELI initiative). For 2011, CLI recorded $2.6 million in revenue from the DOE grant. In 2012, revenue was down slightly due to decreased school district contracts. A higher proportion of CLI’s revenue is now supported by grants and contributions. Revenue Mix Over Time $ in MM 2012 Revenue Mix DOE Grant (Year Revenue Received) $5.9 $6.1 $6.4 $10.4 $10.1 4.8% 62.4% (2.8%) 5.6% 3.8% $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (10.0%) 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% School District Contracts Grants and Contributions All Other Income Y/Y Growth `
  • 5. Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 5 EXPENSES From 2008-2011, CLI did not experience significant fluctuations in expenses. Through 2011, CLI exhibited cost control and significant operating efficiency as total expenses, as a percent of total revenue, decreased dramatically to 64.9% of revenue. However in 2012, expenses increased to 112.0% of revenue. Given CLI’s larger scale operations with the roll out of the MELI program, administrative, fundraising and program expenses all increased significantly. However, approximately 90% of the total nominal increase came from program expenses. The program expense increase can be largely attributed to payroll, program consultants, professional fees, books and program materials. Given that the MELI program is still in its initial stage, CLI may be seeing a lag in expected revenue versus program expenses. Assuming greater national attention from the MELI program and further revenue from the DOE grant, CLI should be able to become more cost efficient again. Expense Breakout Over Time 2011 Cost Per Beneficiary (based on program expenses)1 $ in MM Detailed Financial Information (Tax Basis) 1 Based on CLI Annual Report; 2012 report not yet available 17.6% 82.2% 0.2% School District Contracts Grants and Contributions Other Income 12.1% 34.0% 53.9% 2011 2012 2013-2015 $6.1 $6.7 $5.9 $6.7 0.886.5% 86.3% 85.5% 83.0% 85.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Program Administrative Fundraising Program Expense % of Total $15,964 $7,401 $3,239 $367 $116 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 Per School Per Person Coached Per Persons Served Per Coaching Hour Per Student Impacted Program Expenses 2011 2012 % Change Payroll and Related $1,827,848 $2,425,777 32.7% Program Consultants 1,630,133 2,549,413 56.4% Professional Fees 386,855 1,637,337 323.2% Books 764,150 1,413,044 84.9% Program Materials 375,900 841,950 124.0% Overhead and Other 602,547 803,012 33.3% Total $5,587,433 $9,670,533 73.1%
  • 6. Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 6 Fiscal Year Ended June 30 2009 2010 2011 2012 Revenue and Expenses Operating Revenue: School District Contracts $3,393,044 $3,731,177 $2,060,353 $1,774,618 Grants and Contributions 2,645,437 2,638,023 8,299,133 8,290,971 Product Sales 4,239 5,168 619 1,021 Investment Income 47,737 10,426 11,527 14,228 Miscellaneous Income 604 595 476 365 Total Support and Revenues $6,091,061 $6,385,389 $10,372,108 $10,081,203 % Growth 3.8% 4.8% 62.4% (2.8%) Expenses: Program $5,781,629 $5,045,538 $5,587,433 $9,670,533 Administrative 453,182 354,526 582,933 792,694 Fundraising 465,162 499,494 565,362 824,103 Total Expenses: $6,699,973 $5,899,558 $6,735,728 $11,287,330 % of Revenue 110.0% 92.4% 64.9% 112.0% KEY BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION Cash and Cash Equivalents $1,015,687 $1,368,746 $2,998,904 $3,100,607 Grants Receivable 393,500 600,500 3,235,992 2,086,000 Accounts Receivable 352,166 801,108 226,561 277,774 Inventory 559,777 362,528 313,537 444,121 Plant, Property & Equipment 497,679 405,482 339,617 343,870 Other Assets 56,820 52,175 88,699 71,526 Total Assets 2,875,629 3,590,539 7,203,310 6,323,898 Accounts Payable 311,559 537,718 528,444 863,453 Deferred Revenue 21,920 24,840 10,505 2,211 Total Liabilities 333,479 562,558 538,949 865,664 Net Assets 2,542,150 3,027,981 6,664,361 5,458,234 Program Costs as a % of Total Expenses 86.3% 85.5% 83.0% 85.7% Administrative Costs as a % of Total Expenses 6.8% 6.0% 8.7% 7.0% Fundraising Costs as a % of Total Expenses 6.9% 8.5% 8.4% 7.3% Source: IRS Form 990 (Tax Acccounting Basis)
  • 7. Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 7 OTHER THIRD PARTY RATINGS  As of May 2012, Charity Navigator rates CLI 4 out of 4 stars with a score of 60.83 out of a possible 70.00. Since 2003, CLI has consistently been rated between 3 to 4 stars (except for July 2005 when it received 2 stars), and this is its first 4 star rating since May 2008.  GuideStar rates CLI 5 out of 5 stars based on the average rating from 11 personal reviews. GuideStar also gave “checks” to CLI in all major criteria categories which include transparency, IRS registration and availability of financial data, 990 forms, mission objectives and an impact statement. KEY PEOPLE Kelly Hunter Ed.D. – Executive Director Kelly Hunter has been Executive Director of CLI since December 2011. Prior to that role, she spent 4 years as CLI’s Director of Professional Development. Before joining CLI, she worked as a Literacy Fellow and adjunct professor at the University of Pennsylvania as well as Project Manager at the University’s National Center on Adult Literacy. Kelly holds a Bachelor of Science from Drexel University and a Master’s Degree and Ed.D. from the University of Pennsylvania. Cameron Voss – Deputy Director Cameron Voss joined CLI in 2000, prior to which she was the Director of Development at Frankford Group Ministry and a Research Assistant at Research for Action. Additionally, she worked as an adult literacy and GED teacher at The Lighthouse and Lutheran Settlement House. Cameron holds a BA from Swarthmore College and an MA from Temple University. She also received a certificate in Executive Leadership from Bryn Mawr College Graduate School of Social Work and Social Research. GET INVOLVED You can support Children’s Literacy Initiative with a donation by using the following link: http://www.cliontheweb.org/content/donate-online
  • 8. Children’s Literacy Initiative | Nonprofit Investor Research 8 DISCLOSURES Kabeer Aziz certifies that he does not have any affiliation with Children’s Literacy Initiative and has never made a donation to the organization. Additionally, Kabeer Aziz has not supported directly competing organizations in a greater capacity than a nominal donation. NPI analysts and NPI as an organization do not receive any form of compensation from reviewed charities. This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation for donations. While the reliability of information contained in this report has been assessed by NPI, NPI makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness, except with respect to the Disclosure Section of the report. Any opinions expressed herein reflect our judgment as of the date of the materials and are subject to change without notice. NPI has no obligation to update, modify or amend any report or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate, or if research on the subject organization is withdrawn. Opinions and recommendations in our reports do not take into account specific reader circumstances, objectives, or needs. The recipients of our reports must make their own independent decisions regarding any organization mentioned by NPI. ABOUT NONPROFIT INVESTOR Nonprofit Investor is a nonprofit organization with the mission of improving philanthropic capital allocation and nonprofit effectiveness through research and analysis. NPI brings together volunteers with professional due diligence skills to produce independent, in‐depth evaluations of nonprofits. NPI research is available for free, public download here: www.nonprofitinvestor.org/research. To suggest a charity for NPI to review or to apply as a volunteer, please contact us: www.nonprofitinvestor.org/contact. NPI is a tax‐exempt charity under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (EIN: 45‐3627609). Follow Nonprofit Investor on Twitter: @nonprofitinvest