SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  7
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
NONPROFIT INVESTOR
INDEPENDENT RESEARCH FOR PHILANTHROPY

Project GRAD Houston                                SUMMARY
                                                    Project GRAD Houston (GRAD) is an education reform model at work
Nonprofit Investor Rating:                          in five feeder patterns (Davis, Sam Houston, Reagan, Wheatley and
NEUTRAL                                             Yates) within Houston Independent School District (HISD), serving 64
                                                    schools and over 44,000 economically disadvantaged children – 23%
                                                    of the school district's total school population and approximately
Mission Statement
                                                    24%of its total at-risk population.
The mission of Project GRAD is to support a
quality public education for all students in        STRENGTHS
economically disadvantaged communities so
that high school and college graduation rates       ▲ 20+ year track record. GRAD has been providing low-income,
increase.                                           first-in-family-to-attend-college individuals with academic and social
                                                    opportunities since 1994.
Financial Overview
                                                    ▲ Strong partnership with HISD. GRAD offers subject matter
$ in MM, Fiscal Year Ended December 31
                          2008       2009   2010
                                                    expertise and economy of scale to help HISD schools to increase
Revenue and Support       $5.7       $5.1    $5.5   college awareness.
Operating Expenses        $5.0       $5.0    $5.0
                                                    ▲ Robust program. GRAD covers all aspects of students’ growth
% of Total:                                         from elementary school through college, featuring scholarship,
 Program Expenses        86.1%      87.4%   85.8%   summer institute, fine arts program, college mentorship, and parent
 G&A                     12.3%      11.1%   12.4%   involvement.
 Fundraising              1.5%       1.5%    1.9%
                                                    CAUTIONS
Year Founded: 1994                                  ● Key program metrics have been defined but specific data points
                                                    have yet to be released. GRAD made certain statistics available but
Contact Details                                     we would like to see (1) statistics on individual participants to
Project GRAD Houston                                understand cost per beneficiary served and (2) detailed spending on
3000 Richmond, Suite 400                            Wages & Salaries (~$2MM).
Houston, Texas 77098
832-325-0325                                        ●  Lack of detail regarding programs provided. NPI suggests that
                                                    GRAD provides more detailed information regarding its program
http://www.projectgradhouston.org/                  activities on its website and/or through annual reports.
EIN: 76-0450397
                                                    RECOMMENDATION: NEUTRAL
Analyst: Sheng Xu                                   Project GRAD has a longstanding history with HISD, providing
Peer Review: Kent Chao, Ruth Yen                    programs such as scholarship, mentoring, and education. While a
                                                    small sample of results provided by GRAD indicates increased
Publication Date
                                                    graduation rates and decreased dropout rates, lack of broader
September 27, 2012
                                                    disclosures of results and lack of detail regarding program services
                                                    provided by GRAD limit the ability to draw a causal link between
                                                    programs provided and results achieved.

                                                                      Nonprofit Investor Research | nonprofitinvestor.org
OVERVIEW OF GRAD ACTIVITIES
GRAD provides college awareness and readiness programs for HISD schools. The charity leverage community network
and subject matter expertise to address its mission. The following are GRAD’s main programs:

    •   Scholarship:
            o The Project GRAD Houston Scholarship Program provides financial assistance toward a college education
                 to eligible high school seniors in Houston, Texas. Each qualifying student is awarded up to $1,000
                 annually, for a total of four years. The scholarship is intended to be used continuously over four
                 consecutive years.
            o GRAD students must attend two College Institutes while in high school to receive their $4,000
                 Scholarship. The College Institute offers the uniqueness of being their first college experience.
    •   Service:
            o Walk for Success utilizes thousands of volunteers on a Saturday morning each fall to conduct a door-to-
                 door campaign visiting the homes of every new ninth grade student's family in GRAD-partnering high
                 schools. Volunteers inform parents of college access opportunities while encouraging their involvement
                 with each child's school.
            o College Success Programs through support systems that network mentors and peer leaders with college
                 freshmen.
                      College Access is a library of materials and resources to better prepare students for college.
                      Mentorship programs support entering freshmen and upper classmen, including face-to-face
                          meetings and connecting students to on-campus resources.
                      GRAD Ambassador Program allows successful upperclassmen to serve as college peers. They
                          meet with lower classmen for at least once a month to advise them through experience and
                          resources.
    •   Parent Involvement
            o Parent University is a series of workshops developed by GRAD to help parents become knowledgeable
                 about the academic, financial, social and emotional aspects of preparing for, applying to and succeeding
                 in college.
            o Parent Convention is an annual event held on a different Houston area college campus each year offers
                 parents an array of sessions on college preparation, admission, financial aid as well as new and emerging
                 career opportunities.




PROGRAM RESULTS AND EFFECTIVENESS
In the first four high schools with GRAD programs, school dropout rates decreased by about 9% from 2006 to 2009,
compared to 5% for schools without GRAD programs. From 1997 to 2009, the first four GRAD high schools increased
graduation rates from 42.5% to 66.6% while other high schools remained flat at 55.1%. In 2010, GRAD served ~1,700
students, 91% of which were first generation College bound. However, since GRAD does not comment on the statistical
significance of the results of the four schools with GRAD programs vs. the 66 schools currently served by GRAD, it is not
possible to understand whether these results are representative of GRAD’s overall effectiveness. Additionally, due to
lack of detail on specific program offerings, it is unclear whether the programs services provided to the first four GRAD
programs function similarly to other schools served by GRAD.




                                                       Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research       2
TRANSPARENCY
The programs of GRAD are determined by the Board of Directors and developed and managed by the directors of the
senior management. Therefore, transparency into the GRAD activities and successes is available at the website with
specific program results via the website, including high school graduation rates, dropout rates, college acceptances and
graduation rates. GRAD made available 2010 annual reports directly on its website which were helpful in communicating
notable contracts with HISD and government grants. The charity has also filed its Form 990s on a regular basis. To
further increase transparency, we would like to see statistics on individual participants in various programs and more
detailed expense breakouts for employee salaries.




                                                       Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research     3
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
Revenues
GRAD generates the majority of its revenue from service contracts, which are contracts with HISD schools, making up
approximately 68% of total revenue in 2010. The contract is a six year GEAR UP grant awarded to HISD from the U.S.
Department of Education. The grant award is $3,122,400 per year for the period 2005-2011. In 2010, GRAD also entered
into a one-year agreement with HISD to provide program service to 66 campuses. The contract is expected to be
renewed in 2011. In 2008, U.S. Department of Education awarded GRAD a four year Federal grant (FAME) to continue
funding certain fine arts programs. The award is $252,363 per year. While revenue decreased 10.5% in 2009, the service
contracts helped GRAD to grow 7.8% in 2010 with $5.5MM in revenue.

Expenses
Approximately 86% of GRAD’s total expenses is spent on Program Services. 12% of total expenses is spent on G&A, and
1.5% is spent on fundraising. The low percentage spent on fundraising is a result of multi-year contracts with HISD and
government grants mentioned in the revenue section. The large percentage of program expense is primarily comprised
of wages and salaries (~$2MM) for staff, teachers, and mentors. GRAD prides itself in recruiting excellent talent,
leveraging its expansive community outreach and network. Human capital is considered to be the backbone of GRAD’s
success and therefore making up a large portion of its expense. However, GRAD does not disclose the specific allocation
of the $2MM of wages and salaries on a per program basis. NPI recommends that GRAD track and disclose this
allocation in order to provide donors with an understanding of how program costs relate to program services delivered.

In the Program Services numbers, grants and summer institute program expense increased slightly while other program
expense remained flat. The increase of grants to $1MM from $0.87MM is the result of growth due to the addition of a
government grant.



                                 Revenue Mix Over Time                                               2010 Revenue Mix
$ in MM



    $6.0                $5.7                                                                                     0%
                                                                          $5.5
                                                $5.1
    $5.0                                                                                                                      27%

    $4.0

    $3.0

    $2.0                                                                                                                            5%
                                                                                              68%
    $1.0

    $0.0
                        2008                     2009                      2010
                                                                                             Contributions            Government Grants
                                                                                             Service Contracts        Investment Income
    Service Contracts      Government Grants   Contributions   Investment Income   Other
                                                                                             Other




                                                               Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research             4
Expense Breakout Over Time
$ in MM


          $5.2                                                                                              100%
                             $5.0                          $5.0                          $5.0
                                                                                                            90%
          $5.0
                             86.1%                        87.4%                         85.8%               80%
          $4.8                                                                                              70%
          $4.6                                                                                              60%
                                                                                                            50%
          $4.4                                                                                              40%
          $4.2                                                                                              30%
                                                                                                            20%
          $4.0
                                                                                                            10%
          $3.8                                                                                              0%
                             2008                          2009                         2010

                            Total Program Expense                           Total G&A Expense

                            Total fundraising expense                       Program Expense % of Total


GRAD’s ability to leverage its network and expertise to maintain the relationship with HISD will be critical to its success.
Approximately 68% of GRAD’s revenues is on a termed contract basis and has provided stability for the past three years.
GRAD needs to maintain the contract revenue stream (~$3.5mm) in order to support the large portion of expenses
(~$2MM) allocated to the program staff. After the expiration of the contracts, fundraising expenses at $95,000may
increase if existing contracts are not renewed.




                                                        Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research         5
Detailed Financial Information
$ in MM
Fiscal Year Ended December 31                                               2008         2009             2010
Operating Revenue:
 Contributions                                                          $1,759,163       $1,233,336       $1,483,883
 Government Grants                                                         280,434          287,438          267,343
 Service Contracts                                                       3,351,202        3,547,386        3,738,633
 Investment Income                                                           3,224               63               44
 Other                                                                     268,069                -                -
Total Support and Revenues                                              $5,662,092       $5,068,223       $5,489,903
 % Growth                                                                                      -10%               8%

Expenses:
 Program expenses
  Grants and other assistance                                             $781,500         $867,751       $1,008,102
  Summer Institute Program                                                 355,386          571,062          563,031
  Other Salaries and wages                                               2,075,088        2,052,118        1,937,407
  Service Fees                                                             324,709          272,804          252,573
  Office Expenses                                                          545,747          388,917          400,510
  Other                                                                    185,578          241,001          167,156
 Total Program Expense                                                  $4,268,008       $4,393,653       $4,328,779

  General and Administrative expense
   Compensation                                                             $208,201      $203,106         $207,059
   Other Salaries and wages                                                  228,384       250,942          272,964
   Service Fees                                                               49,979        40,396           46,083
   Office Expenses                                                            38,795        28,258           44,926
   Other                                                                      86,213        35,565           52,888
  Total G&A Expense                                                         $611,572      $558,267         $623,920

  Fundraising expenses
   Other Salaries and wages                                                  $66,057       $70,816          $77,286
   Service Fees                                                                2,476           100                -
   Office Expenses                                                             5,041         5,140           14,791
   Other                                                                       1,159         1,429            3,217
  Total fundraising expense                                                  $74,733       $77,485          $95,294

Total Expenses:                                                         $4,954,313       $5,029,405       $5,047,993
 % of Revenue                                                                  87%              99%              92%

Revenue Less Expenses                                                       $707,779       $38,818         $441,910

  Program Costs as a % of Total Expenses                                           86%          87%              86%
  G&A as a % of Total Expenses                                                     12%          11%              12%
  Fundraising as a % of Total Expenses                                              2%           2%               2%


Source: IRS Forms 990


                                                     Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research    6
THIRD PARTY RATINGS
Charity Navigator rates the organization 3 out of 4 stars, receiving a 66 out of 70 score for accountability and
transparency. GRAD receives a 48.04 out of 70 for financial and has an official representative registered with Charity
Navigator.
Guide Star has awarded GRAD with the Guide Star Exchange Seal for commitment to transparency.
(http://www.guidestar.org/organizations/76-0450397/project-grad-houston.aspx)
Project GRAD Houston is not currently reviewed on Great Nonprofits.



GET INVOLVED
Donate: https://npo.networkforgood.org/Donate/Donate.aspx?npoSubscriptionId=1000791
Volunteer: http://www.projectgradhouston.org/pace/walk-for-success.php



DISCLOSURES
Sheng Xu certifies that she does not have any affiliation with Project Grad Houston and has never made a donation to the
organization. Additionally, Sheng has not supported directly competing organizations in a greater capacity than a nominal donation.
NPI analysts and NPI as an organization do not receive any form of compensation from reviewed charities.
This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation for donations. While the reliability of information
contained in this report has been assessed by NPI, NPI makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness, except with
respect to the Disclosure Section of the report. Any opinions expressed herein reflect our judgment as of the date of the materials
and are subject to change without notice. NPI has no obligation to update, modify or amend any report or to otherwise notify a
reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes
or subsequently becomes inaccurate, or if research on the subject organization is withdrawn.
Opinions and recommendations in our reports do not take into account specific reader circumstances, objectives, or needs. The
recipients of our reports must make their own independent decisions regarding any organization mentioned by NPI.




ABOUT NONPROFIT INVESTOR
Nonprofit Investor is a nonprofit organization with the mission of improving philanthropic capital allocation and nonprofit
effectiveness through research and analysis. NPI brings together volunteers with professional due diligence skills to produce
independent, in-depth evaluations of nonprofits. NPI research is available for free, public download
here: www.nonprofitinvestor.org/research. To suggest a charity for NPI to review or to apply as a volunteer, please contact
us: www.nonprofitinvestor.org/contact. NPI is a tax-exempt charity under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (EIN: 45-
3627609). Follow Nonprofit Investor on Twitter: @nonprofitinvest




                                                              Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research             7

Contenu connexe

Similaire à NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston

VVOB Annual Report 2013
VVOB Annual Report 2013VVOB Annual Report 2013
VVOB Annual Report 2013VVOB vzw
 
Case Book AdPR academy
Case Book AdPR academyCase Book AdPR academy
Case Book AdPR academyNatalieDutton5
 
SAI Evaluation Report-for issue
SAI Evaluation Report-for issueSAI Evaluation Report-for issue
SAI Evaluation Report-for issueMeghan Mathieson
 
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master DegreesErasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master DegreesPhDSofiaUniversity
 
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy final
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy  finalEnrollment management as a fiscal strategy  final
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy finalSukhwant Jhaj
 
How can universities contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Develop...
How can universities contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Develop...How can universities contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Develop...
How can universities contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Develop...Sustainability Knowledge Group
 
NPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College PossibleNPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College PossibleNonprofit Investor
 
2015 Appeal Letter Photo insert
2015 Appeal Letter Photo insert2015 Appeal Letter Photo insert
2015 Appeal Letter Photo insertCaitlyn Allen
 
Audit of Oregon Community Colleges
Audit of Oregon Community CollegesAudit of Oregon Community Colleges
Audit of Oregon Community CollegesAmanda Lamb
 
Project DEgree_brochure_2011
Project DEgree_brochure_2011Project DEgree_brochure_2011
Project DEgree_brochure_2011stephenrice1970
 
SCIDpda Fundraising Recs
SCIDpda Fundraising Recs SCIDpda Fundraising Recs
SCIDpda Fundraising Recs Sara Young
 
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5Oscar Sanchez
 
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5Vivian Nguyen
 
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5Melanie Ramirez
 

Similaire à NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston (20)

VVOB Annual Report 2013
VVOB Annual Report 2013VVOB Annual Report 2013
VVOB Annual Report 2013
 
NPI Evaluation of BUILD
NPI Evaluation of BUILDNPI Evaluation of BUILD
NPI Evaluation of BUILD
 
Global Partnership for Education Brochure
Global Partnership for Education BrochureGlobal Partnership for Education Brochure
Global Partnership for Education Brochure
 
Case Book AdPR academy
Case Book AdPR academyCase Book AdPR academy
Case Book AdPR academy
 
SAI Evaluation Report-for issue
SAI Evaluation Report-for issueSAI Evaluation Report-for issue
SAI Evaluation Report-for issue
 
NPI Evaluation of Spark
NPI Evaluation of SparkNPI Evaluation of Spark
NPI Evaluation of Spark
 
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master DegreesErasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees
 
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy final
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy  finalEnrollment management as a fiscal strategy  final
Enrollment management as a fiscal strategy final
 
How can universities contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Develop...
How can universities contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Develop...How can universities contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Develop...
How can universities contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Develop...
 
NPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College PossibleNPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College Possible
 
The Business Canvas Model
The Business Canvas ModelThe Business Canvas Model
The Business Canvas Model
 
2015 Appeal Letter Photo insert
2015 Appeal Letter Photo insert2015 Appeal Letter Photo insert
2015 Appeal Letter Photo insert
 
Audit of Oregon Community Colleges
Audit of Oregon Community CollegesAudit of Oregon Community Colleges
Audit of Oregon Community Colleges
 
Project DEgree_brochure_2011
Project DEgree_brochure_2011Project DEgree_brochure_2011
Project DEgree_brochure_2011
 
SCIDpda Fundraising Recs
SCIDpda Fundraising Recs SCIDpda Fundraising Recs
SCIDpda Fundraising Recs
 
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
 
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
 
The Sage Project
The Sage ProjectThe Sage Project
The Sage Project
 
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
SummitPRFinalProject_Group5
 
MB Slides (15 March)
MB Slides (15 March)MB Slides (15 March)
MB Slides (15 March)
 

Plus de Nonprofit Investor

NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson CenterNPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson CenterNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth ProgramsNPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth ProgramsNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door VenturesNPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door VenturesNonprofit Investor
 
NPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: waterNPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: waterNonprofit Investor
 
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating SummaryPhiladelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating SummaryNonprofit Investor
 
Delancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating SummaryDelancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating SummaryNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for YouthNPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for YouthNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science InitiativeNPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science InitiativeNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to ReadNPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to ReadNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox FoundationNPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox FoundationNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpringNPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpringNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation Nonprofit Investor
 

Plus de Nonprofit Investor (20)

NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson CenterNPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
 
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth ProgramsNPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
 
NPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door VenturesNPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
 
Charity: water Rating Summary
Charity: water Rating SummaryCharity: water Rating Summary
Charity: water Rating Summary
 
NPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: waterNPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: water
 
Do-All, Inc. Rating Summary
Do-All, Inc. Rating SummaryDo-All, Inc. Rating Summary
Do-All, Inc. Rating Summary
 
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating SummaryPhiladelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
 
Year Up Rating Summary
Year Up Rating SummaryYear Up Rating Summary
Year Up Rating Summary
 
Delancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating SummaryDelancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
 
iMentor Rating Summary
iMentor Rating SummaryiMentor Rating Summary
iMentor Rating Summary
 
First Book Rating Summary
First Book Rating SummaryFirst Book Rating Summary
First Book Rating Summary
 
NPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for YouthNPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
 
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science InitiativeNPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
NPI Evaluation of National Math and Science Initiative
 
NPI Evaluation of JobTrain
NPI Evaluation of JobTrainNPI Evaluation of JobTrain
NPI Evaluation of JobTrain
 
NPI Evaluation of HOBY
NPI Evaluation of HOBYNPI Evaluation of HOBY
NPI Evaluation of HOBY
 
NPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to ReadNPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to Read
 
NPI Evaluation of NMFA
NPI Evaluation of NMFANPI Evaluation of NMFA
NPI Evaluation of NMFA
 
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox FoundationNPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
 
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpringNPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
 
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
 

Dernier

Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSEDust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSEaurabinda banchhor
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxAnupkumar Sharma
 
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Mark Reed
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfJemuel Francisco
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemChristalin Nelson
 
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONTHEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONHumphrey A Beña
 
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptxmary850239
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4JOYLYNSAMANIEGO
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptxmary850239
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemChristalin Nelson
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptshraddhaparab530
 
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptxMillenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptxJanEmmanBrigoli
 
ClimART Action | eTwinning Project
ClimART Action    |    eTwinning ProjectClimART Action    |    eTwinning Project
ClimART Action | eTwinning Projectjordimapav
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)lakshayb543
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxHumphrey A Beña
 

Dernier (20)

LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxLEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxFINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTAParadigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
 
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptxINCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
 
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSEDust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
 
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
 
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONTHEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
 
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management System
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
 
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
 
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptxMillenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
Millenials and Fillennials (Ethical Challenge and Responses).pptx
 
ClimART Action | eTwinning Project
ClimART Action    |    eTwinning ProjectClimART Action    |    eTwinning Project
ClimART Action | eTwinning Project
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
 

NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston

  • 1. NONPROFIT INVESTOR INDEPENDENT RESEARCH FOR PHILANTHROPY Project GRAD Houston SUMMARY Project GRAD Houston (GRAD) is an education reform model at work Nonprofit Investor Rating: in five feeder patterns (Davis, Sam Houston, Reagan, Wheatley and NEUTRAL Yates) within Houston Independent School District (HISD), serving 64 schools and over 44,000 economically disadvantaged children – 23% of the school district's total school population and approximately Mission Statement 24%of its total at-risk population. The mission of Project GRAD is to support a quality public education for all students in STRENGTHS economically disadvantaged communities so that high school and college graduation rates ▲ 20+ year track record. GRAD has been providing low-income, increase. first-in-family-to-attend-college individuals with academic and social opportunities since 1994. Financial Overview ▲ Strong partnership with HISD. GRAD offers subject matter $ in MM, Fiscal Year Ended December 31 2008 2009 2010 expertise and economy of scale to help HISD schools to increase Revenue and Support $5.7 $5.1 $5.5 college awareness. Operating Expenses $5.0 $5.0 $5.0 ▲ Robust program. GRAD covers all aspects of students’ growth % of Total: from elementary school through college, featuring scholarship, Program Expenses 86.1% 87.4% 85.8% summer institute, fine arts program, college mentorship, and parent G&A 12.3% 11.1% 12.4% involvement. Fundraising 1.5% 1.5% 1.9% CAUTIONS Year Founded: 1994 ● Key program metrics have been defined but specific data points have yet to be released. GRAD made certain statistics available but Contact Details we would like to see (1) statistics on individual participants to Project GRAD Houston understand cost per beneficiary served and (2) detailed spending on 3000 Richmond, Suite 400 Wages & Salaries (~$2MM). Houston, Texas 77098 832-325-0325 ● Lack of detail regarding programs provided. NPI suggests that GRAD provides more detailed information regarding its program http://www.projectgradhouston.org/ activities on its website and/or through annual reports. EIN: 76-0450397 RECOMMENDATION: NEUTRAL Analyst: Sheng Xu Project GRAD has a longstanding history with HISD, providing Peer Review: Kent Chao, Ruth Yen programs such as scholarship, mentoring, and education. While a small sample of results provided by GRAD indicates increased Publication Date graduation rates and decreased dropout rates, lack of broader September 27, 2012 disclosures of results and lack of detail regarding program services provided by GRAD limit the ability to draw a causal link between programs provided and results achieved. Nonprofit Investor Research | nonprofitinvestor.org
  • 2. OVERVIEW OF GRAD ACTIVITIES GRAD provides college awareness and readiness programs for HISD schools. The charity leverage community network and subject matter expertise to address its mission. The following are GRAD’s main programs: • Scholarship: o The Project GRAD Houston Scholarship Program provides financial assistance toward a college education to eligible high school seniors in Houston, Texas. Each qualifying student is awarded up to $1,000 annually, for a total of four years. The scholarship is intended to be used continuously over four consecutive years. o GRAD students must attend two College Institutes while in high school to receive their $4,000 Scholarship. The College Institute offers the uniqueness of being their first college experience. • Service: o Walk for Success utilizes thousands of volunteers on a Saturday morning each fall to conduct a door-to- door campaign visiting the homes of every new ninth grade student's family in GRAD-partnering high schools. Volunteers inform parents of college access opportunities while encouraging their involvement with each child's school. o College Success Programs through support systems that network mentors and peer leaders with college freshmen.  College Access is a library of materials and resources to better prepare students for college.  Mentorship programs support entering freshmen and upper classmen, including face-to-face meetings and connecting students to on-campus resources.  GRAD Ambassador Program allows successful upperclassmen to serve as college peers. They meet with lower classmen for at least once a month to advise them through experience and resources. • Parent Involvement o Parent University is a series of workshops developed by GRAD to help parents become knowledgeable about the academic, financial, social and emotional aspects of preparing for, applying to and succeeding in college. o Parent Convention is an annual event held on a different Houston area college campus each year offers parents an array of sessions on college preparation, admission, financial aid as well as new and emerging career opportunities. PROGRAM RESULTS AND EFFECTIVENESS In the first four high schools with GRAD programs, school dropout rates decreased by about 9% from 2006 to 2009, compared to 5% for schools without GRAD programs. From 1997 to 2009, the first four GRAD high schools increased graduation rates from 42.5% to 66.6% while other high schools remained flat at 55.1%. In 2010, GRAD served ~1,700 students, 91% of which were first generation College bound. However, since GRAD does not comment on the statistical significance of the results of the four schools with GRAD programs vs. the 66 schools currently served by GRAD, it is not possible to understand whether these results are representative of GRAD’s overall effectiveness. Additionally, due to lack of detail on specific program offerings, it is unclear whether the programs services provided to the first four GRAD programs function similarly to other schools served by GRAD. Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research 2
  • 3. TRANSPARENCY The programs of GRAD are determined by the Board of Directors and developed and managed by the directors of the senior management. Therefore, transparency into the GRAD activities and successes is available at the website with specific program results via the website, including high school graduation rates, dropout rates, college acceptances and graduation rates. GRAD made available 2010 annual reports directly on its website which were helpful in communicating notable contracts with HISD and government grants. The charity has also filed its Form 990s on a regular basis. To further increase transparency, we would like to see statistics on individual participants in various programs and more detailed expense breakouts for employee salaries. Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research 3
  • 4. FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Revenues GRAD generates the majority of its revenue from service contracts, which are contracts with HISD schools, making up approximately 68% of total revenue in 2010. The contract is a six year GEAR UP grant awarded to HISD from the U.S. Department of Education. The grant award is $3,122,400 per year for the period 2005-2011. In 2010, GRAD also entered into a one-year agreement with HISD to provide program service to 66 campuses. The contract is expected to be renewed in 2011. In 2008, U.S. Department of Education awarded GRAD a four year Federal grant (FAME) to continue funding certain fine arts programs. The award is $252,363 per year. While revenue decreased 10.5% in 2009, the service contracts helped GRAD to grow 7.8% in 2010 with $5.5MM in revenue. Expenses Approximately 86% of GRAD’s total expenses is spent on Program Services. 12% of total expenses is spent on G&A, and 1.5% is spent on fundraising. The low percentage spent on fundraising is a result of multi-year contracts with HISD and government grants mentioned in the revenue section. The large percentage of program expense is primarily comprised of wages and salaries (~$2MM) for staff, teachers, and mentors. GRAD prides itself in recruiting excellent talent, leveraging its expansive community outreach and network. Human capital is considered to be the backbone of GRAD’s success and therefore making up a large portion of its expense. However, GRAD does not disclose the specific allocation of the $2MM of wages and salaries on a per program basis. NPI recommends that GRAD track and disclose this allocation in order to provide donors with an understanding of how program costs relate to program services delivered. In the Program Services numbers, grants and summer institute program expense increased slightly while other program expense remained flat. The increase of grants to $1MM from $0.87MM is the result of growth due to the addition of a government grant. Revenue Mix Over Time 2010 Revenue Mix $ in MM $6.0 $5.7 0% $5.5 $5.1 $5.0 27% $4.0 $3.0 $2.0 5% 68% $1.0 $0.0 2008 2009 2010 Contributions Government Grants Service Contracts Investment Income Service Contracts Government Grants Contributions Investment Income Other Other Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research 4
  • 5. Expense Breakout Over Time $ in MM $5.2 100% $5.0 $5.0 $5.0 90% $5.0 86.1% 87.4% 85.8% 80% $4.8 70% $4.6 60% 50% $4.4 40% $4.2 30% 20% $4.0 10% $3.8 0% 2008 2009 2010 Total Program Expense Total G&A Expense Total fundraising expense Program Expense % of Total GRAD’s ability to leverage its network and expertise to maintain the relationship with HISD will be critical to its success. Approximately 68% of GRAD’s revenues is on a termed contract basis and has provided stability for the past three years. GRAD needs to maintain the contract revenue stream (~$3.5mm) in order to support the large portion of expenses (~$2MM) allocated to the program staff. After the expiration of the contracts, fundraising expenses at $95,000may increase if existing contracts are not renewed. Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research 5
  • 6. Detailed Financial Information $ in MM Fiscal Year Ended December 31 2008 2009 2010 Operating Revenue: Contributions $1,759,163 $1,233,336 $1,483,883 Government Grants 280,434 287,438 267,343 Service Contracts 3,351,202 3,547,386 3,738,633 Investment Income 3,224 63 44 Other 268,069 - - Total Support and Revenues $5,662,092 $5,068,223 $5,489,903 % Growth -10% 8% Expenses: Program expenses Grants and other assistance $781,500 $867,751 $1,008,102 Summer Institute Program 355,386 571,062 563,031 Other Salaries and wages 2,075,088 2,052,118 1,937,407 Service Fees 324,709 272,804 252,573 Office Expenses 545,747 388,917 400,510 Other 185,578 241,001 167,156 Total Program Expense $4,268,008 $4,393,653 $4,328,779 General and Administrative expense Compensation $208,201 $203,106 $207,059 Other Salaries and wages 228,384 250,942 272,964 Service Fees 49,979 40,396 46,083 Office Expenses 38,795 28,258 44,926 Other 86,213 35,565 52,888 Total G&A Expense $611,572 $558,267 $623,920 Fundraising expenses Other Salaries and wages $66,057 $70,816 $77,286 Service Fees 2,476 100 - Office Expenses 5,041 5,140 14,791 Other 1,159 1,429 3,217 Total fundraising expense $74,733 $77,485 $95,294 Total Expenses: $4,954,313 $5,029,405 $5,047,993 % of Revenue 87% 99% 92% Revenue Less Expenses $707,779 $38,818 $441,910 Program Costs as a % of Total Expenses 86% 87% 86% G&A as a % of Total Expenses 12% 11% 12% Fundraising as a % of Total Expenses 2% 2% 2% Source: IRS Forms 990 Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research 6
  • 7. THIRD PARTY RATINGS Charity Navigator rates the organization 3 out of 4 stars, receiving a 66 out of 70 score for accountability and transparency. GRAD receives a 48.04 out of 70 for financial and has an official representative registered with Charity Navigator. Guide Star has awarded GRAD with the Guide Star Exchange Seal for commitment to transparency. (http://www.guidestar.org/organizations/76-0450397/project-grad-houston.aspx) Project GRAD Houston is not currently reviewed on Great Nonprofits. GET INVOLVED Donate: https://npo.networkforgood.org/Donate/Donate.aspx?npoSubscriptionId=1000791 Volunteer: http://www.projectgradhouston.org/pace/walk-for-success.php DISCLOSURES Sheng Xu certifies that she does not have any affiliation with Project Grad Houston and has never made a donation to the organization. Additionally, Sheng has not supported directly competing organizations in a greater capacity than a nominal donation. NPI analysts and NPI as an organization do not receive any form of compensation from reviewed charities. This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation for donations. While the reliability of information contained in this report has been assessed by NPI, NPI makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness, except with respect to the Disclosure Section of the report. Any opinions expressed herein reflect our judgment as of the date of the materials and are subject to change without notice. NPI has no obligation to update, modify or amend any report or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate, or if research on the subject organization is withdrawn. Opinions and recommendations in our reports do not take into account specific reader circumstances, objectives, or needs. The recipients of our reports must make their own independent decisions regarding any organization mentioned by NPI. ABOUT NONPROFIT INVESTOR Nonprofit Investor is a nonprofit organization with the mission of improving philanthropic capital allocation and nonprofit effectiveness through research and analysis. NPI brings together volunteers with professional due diligence skills to produce independent, in-depth evaluations of nonprofits. NPI research is available for free, public download here: www.nonprofitinvestor.org/research. To suggest a charity for NPI to review or to apply as a volunteer, please contact us: www.nonprofitinvestor.org/contact. NPI is a tax-exempt charity under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (EIN: 45- 3627609). Follow Nonprofit Investor on Twitter: @nonprofitinvest Project GRAD Houston | Nonprofit Investor Research 7