SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  13
What is Ratio Analysis?
• It is Not just comparing different numbers from the balance
  sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.

• It is about comparing the numbers against previous years, other
  companies, the industry or even the economy in general.

• Ratios look at the relationships between individual values and
  relate them to how a company has performed in the past, and
  might perform in the future.
Ratio Analysis
 LIQUIDITY RATIOS: tests the ability of a firm to meet its
  current liabilities

 SOLVENCY RATIOS: tests the long term solvency of a
  firm

 TURNOVER RATIOS: indicates the efficiency with which
  assets are utilized

 PROFITABILITY RATIOS: measures the efficiency of a
  business
Liquidity Analysis
                RATIOS                        LENOVO LENOVO    HP            HP
                                               (2011) (2010) (2011)        (2010)
  Current Ratio: (Current Assets/Current        0.99    0.97       1.01     1.10
               Liabilities)
Quick Ratio: (Current Assets- Stock/Current     0.89    0.83       0.58     0.66
                Liabilities)

Interpretations
Current ratio: Normally a current ratio of 2:1 is considered as satisfactory
HP has a higher current ratio that is better able to meet its current liabilities
Quick ratio: Normally a quick ratio of 1:1 is considered satisfactory. Lenovo
has enough short term assets to pay its short term liabilities.
Solvency Analysis
               RATIOS                       LENNOVO LENNOVO    HP     HP
                                              (2011)  (2010) (2011) (2010)
       Long Term Debt / Equity                0.00      0.18      0.58    0.38
          Total Debt / Equity                 0.14      0.22      0.79    0.55
    Total Debt / Capital Employed             0.10      0.14      0.44    0.36
Proprietary ratio: (share holders funds /     0.17      0.18      0.30    0.32
              total assets)
 Interpretation:
 Debt Equity Ratio: Here debt equity ratio is less in 2011 for Lenovo, which is
 good for the company as it shows the debt is paid much faster in that year.
 As compared to HP, Lenovo has a better financial position.
Interpretation of solvency analysis
             RATIOS                   LENNOVO LENNOVO    HP                    HP
                                        (2011)  (2010) (2011)                 (2010)
Proprietary ratio: (share holders         0.17           0.18         0.30     0.32
      funds / total assets)

Interpretation:
Proprietary ratio: The standard proprietary ratio should be1:3. The higher the
Proprietary ratio the stronger the financial position of the company is but neither of
the company has been able to meet the standard ratio.
Activity Ratio
              RATIOS                     LENOVO LENOVO HP        HP
                                          (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010)

Inventory Turnover Ratio: (COGS/Avg.       23.92   16.85   16.99   19.49
               Stock)
   Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio: (Net        11.02    8.62   10.35   10.71
          Sales/Fixed Assets)

   Total Asset Turnover Ratio: (Net        8.00     5.34   0.98    1.01
           Sales/Total Asset)

 Capital Turnover Rate: (Sales/Capital     8.08     6.54   2.08    2.26
             Employed)
Interpretation of Activity Ratio
             RATIOS                    LENOVO       LENOVO          HP       HP
                                        (2011)       (2010)       (2011)    (2010)
Inventory Turnover Ratio: (COGS/Avg.     23.92          16.85      16.99     19.49
               Stock)
   Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio: (Net      11.02          8.62       10.35     10.71
          Sales/Fixed Assets)

Interpretation:
Inventory Turnover Ratio: if the ratio is higher it is better for the company
because it show that finished stock is rapidly turnover and low stock turnover is
is not desirable because it show obsolete stock or carry too much of stock, so Lenovo
is doing well than HP.
 Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio: The higher the ratio is the better is the
performance of the company and low ratio indicate that fixed assets are
not being effectively utilized, so Lenovo is doing well in 2011.
Interpretation of Activity Ratio
            RATIOS                      LENOVO      LENOVO            HP        HP
                                         (2011)      (2010)         (2011)     (2010)
  Total Asset Turnover Ratio: (Net        8.00          5.34         0.98       1.01
          Sales/Total Asset)
Capital Turnover Rate: (Sales/Capital     8.08          6.54         2.08       2.26
            Employed)

Interpretation:
Total Asset Turnover Ratio: The higher the ratio is the higher will be the
overtrading of total assets, while low ratio reveal idle capacity, so Lenovo is doing
good in compare to HP.
Capital Turnover Rate: The higher the ratio the greater are the profit and a
low capital turnover ratio should be taken to mean sufficient sales are not
being made and profit are low, so here Lenovo is doing good profit in 2011
and also in compare to HP.
Profitability Analysis
               RATIOS                         LENOVO LENOVO HP        HP
                                               (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010)
Return On Equity: (Profit-Dividend Due To      0.148    0.080   0.183   0.216
 Pref. Shareholder/Equity Share Capital)
  Return On Total Assets: (PBIT/Total           2.55    1.44    5.46    7.04
             Asset)*100
   Operating Profit Ratio: (Operating           1.77    1.32    7.61    9.11
         Profit/Net Sales)*100
Net Profit Ratio: (Net Profit After Tax/Net     1.27    0.78    5.56    6.95
               Sales)*100
      Return on capital employed:              10.22    5.10    16.00   20.00
      (PBIT/capital employed)*100
Earnings Per Share: (NPAT/No of equity          2.84    1.42    1.68    2.08
           shares issued)
Interpretation of Profitability Analysis
               RATIOS                       LENOVO LENOVO           HP        HP
                                             (2011) (2010)        (2011)    (2010)
Return On Equity: (Profit-Dividend Due To    0.148      0.080      0.183     0.216
 Pref. Shareholder/Equity Share Capital)
  Return On Total Assets: (PBIT/Total         2.55      1.44       5.46      7.04
             Asset)*100
   Operating Profit Ratio: (Operating         1.77      1.32       7.61      9.11
         Profit/Net Sales)*100
Interpretation:
Return On Equity: Over here Lenovo is doing good as the more they get return
from the equity shareholder the more it is good for the company
Return On Total Assets: The higher the ratio is the better it is for the company
because the more the company get return from total asset the more is good for the firm.
Operating Profit Ratio: Higher the ratio is the better it is for the company as it
indicate the portion remain out of every rupee worth of sale after all operating cost
expense have been met.
Interpretation of Profitability Analysis
              RATIOS                     LENOVO    LENOVO          HP        HP
                                          (2011)    (2010)       (2011)    (2010)
   Net Profit Ratio: (Net Profit After     1.27       0.78        5.56       6.95
         Tax/Net Sales)*100
    Return on capital employed:           10.22       5.10        16.00     20.00
     (PBIT/capital employed)*100
  Earnings Per Share: (NPAT/No of          2.84       1.42        1.68       2.08
        equity shares issued)
Interpretation:
 Net Profit Ratio: Higher the ratio is the better it is for the company because it
give idea to improve the efficiency, Lenovo is doing good in 2011 compare to 2010
Return on capital employed: The higher the return on capital employed will be
the higher the return on capital the company will get, Lenovo is doing good in 2011
Earnings Per Share: measures the profitability of a firm on per share basis
THANK YOU

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Presentation on accounting for management (1)

Feb 16 2012 FYR 2011 conference call presentation (James Singh)
Feb 16 2012 FYR 2011 conference call presentation (James Singh)Feb 16 2012 FYR 2011 conference call presentation (James Singh)
Feb 16 2012 FYR 2011 conference call presentation (James Singh)Nestlé SA
 
Brief recording
Brief recordingBrief recording
Brief recordingHuma Mehir
 
Accounting presentation
Accounting presentationAccounting presentation
Accounting presentationASIF_HASNAT002
 
Hcc ru2 qfy2011-291010
Hcc ru2 qfy2011-291010Hcc ru2 qfy2011-291010
Hcc ru2 qfy2011-291010Angel Broking
 
Du Pont Presentation
Du Pont PresentationDu Pont Presentation
Du Pont PresentationRushit Shah
 
Fourth Quarter 2011 Masco Earnings Presentation
Fourth Quarter 2011 Masco Earnings PresentationFourth Quarter 2011 Masco Earnings Presentation
Fourth Quarter 2011 Masco Earnings PresentationMasco_Investors
 
Finance project
Finance projectFinance project
Finance projectRavi Gupta
 
Financial ratio analysis report htc
Financial ratio analysis report htcFinancial ratio analysis report htc
Financial ratio analysis report htcFedrickC
 
2011 hy results_confcall
2011 hy results_confcall2011 hy results_confcall
2011 hy results_confcallNestlé SA
 
AkzoNobel Q4 2011 Results Investor Update Presentation
AkzoNobel Q4 2011 Results Investor Update PresentationAkzoNobel Q4 2011 Results Investor Update Presentation
AkzoNobel Q4 2011 Results Investor Update PresentationAkzoNobel
 
Ratio analysis of a Clearing Agency, chennai
Ratio analysis of a Clearing Agency, chennaiRatio analysis of a Clearing Agency, chennai
Ratio analysis of a Clearing Agency, chennaiNishant Shah
 
Ratios of a Clearing and Fowarding agency
Ratios of a Clearing and Fowarding agencyRatios of a Clearing and Fowarding agency
Ratios of a Clearing and Fowarding agencyNishant Shah
 
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptxStock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptxAdarshSingh749984
 
20 Most important financial ratios
20 Most important financial ratios20 Most important financial ratios
20 Most important financial ratiosDigitalwale Brands
 
Pres annual results 2011 publi groupe 9 march
Pres annual results 2011 publi groupe 9  marchPres annual results 2011 publi groupe 9  march
Pres annual results 2011 publi groupe 9 marchPubliGroupe
 
Mergers and acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitionsMergers and acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitionsbradhapa
 
Jyoti structures ru4 qfy2010-240510
Jyoti structures ru4 qfy2010-240510Jyoti structures ru4 qfy2010-240510
Jyoti structures ru4 qfy2010-240510Angel Broking
 
Analysis of financial statements@ bec doms
Analysis of financial statements@ bec domsAnalysis of financial statements@ bec doms
Analysis of financial statements@ bec domsBabasab Patil
 
2011 Half Year Results Presentation
2011 Half Year Results Presentation2011 Half Year Results Presentation
2011 Half Year Results PresentationSGS
 

Similaire à Presentation on accounting for management (1) (20)

Feb 16 2012 FYR 2011 conference call presentation (James Singh)
Feb 16 2012 FYR 2011 conference call presentation (James Singh)Feb 16 2012 FYR 2011 conference call presentation (James Singh)
Feb 16 2012 FYR 2011 conference call presentation (James Singh)
 
Brief recording
Brief recordingBrief recording
Brief recording
 
Accounting presentation
Accounting presentationAccounting presentation
Accounting presentation
 
Hcc ru2 qfy2011-291010
Hcc ru2 qfy2011-291010Hcc ru2 qfy2011-291010
Hcc ru2 qfy2011-291010
 
Du Pont Presentation
Du Pont PresentationDu Pont Presentation
Du Pont Presentation
 
Fourth Quarter 2011 Masco Earnings Presentation
Fourth Quarter 2011 Masco Earnings PresentationFourth Quarter 2011 Masco Earnings Presentation
Fourth Quarter 2011 Masco Earnings Presentation
 
Finance project
Finance projectFinance project
Finance project
 
Financial ratio analysis report htc
Financial ratio analysis report htcFinancial ratio analysis report htc
Financial ratio analysis report htc
 
2011 hy results_confcall
2011 hy results_confcall2011 hy results_confcall
2011 hy results_confcall
 
AkzoNobel Q4 2011 Results Investor Update Presentation
AkzoNobel Q4 2011 Results Investor Update PresentationAkzoNobel Q4 2011 Results Investor Update Presentation
AkzoNobel Q4 2011 Results Investor Update Presentation
 
Ratio analysis of a Clearing Agency, chennai
Ratio analysis of a Clearing Agency, chennaiRatio analysis of a Clearing Agency, chennai
Ratio analysis of a Clearing Agency, chennai
 
Ratios of a Clearing and Fowarding agency
Ratios of a Clearing and Fowarding agencyRatios of a Clearing and Fowarding agency
Ratios of a Clearing and Fowarding agency
 
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptxStock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
 
20 Most important financial ratios
20 Most important financial ratios20 Most important financial ratios
20 Most important financial ratios
 
Pres annual results 2011 publi groupe 9 march
Pres annual results 2011 publi groupe 9  marchPres annual results 2011 publi groupe 9  march
Pres annual results 2011 publi groupe 9 march
 
Mergers and acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitionsMergers and acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitions
 
Jyoti structures ru4 qfy2010-240510
Jyoti structures ru4 qfy2010-240510Jyoti structures ru4 qfy2010-240510
Jyoti structures ru4 qfy2010-240510
 
Analysis of financial statements@ bec doms
Analysis of financial statements@ bec domsAnalysis of financial statements@ bec doms
Analysis of financial statements@ bec doms
 
Subros
Subros Subros
Subros
 
2011 Half Year Results Presentation
2011 Half Year Results Presentation2011 Half Year Results Presentation
2011 Half Year Results Presentation
 

Presentation on accounting for management (1)

  • 1.
  • 2. What is Ratio Analysis? • It is Not just comparing different numbers from the balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. • It is about comparing the numbers against previous years, other companies, the industry or even the economy in general. • Ratios look at the relationships between individual values and relate them to how a company has performed in the past, and might perform in the future.
  • 3. Ratio Analysis  LIQUIDITY RATIOS: tests the ability of a firm to meet its current liabilities  SOLVENCY RATIOS: tests the long term solvency of a firm  TURNOVER RATIOS: indicates the efficiency with which assets are utilized  PROFITABILITY RATIOS: measures the efficiency of a business
  • 4. Liquidity Analysis RATIOS LENOVO LENOVO HP HP (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010) Current Ratio: (Current Assets/Current 0.99 0.97 1.01 1.10 Liabilities) Quick Ratio: (Current Assets- Stock/Current 0.89 0.83 0.58 0.66 Liabilities) Interpretations Current ratio: Normally a current ratio of 2:1 is considered as satisfactory HP has a higher current ratio that is better able to meet its current liabilities Quick ratio: Normally a quick ratio of 1:1 is considered satisfactory. Lenovo has enough short term assets to pay its short term liabilities.
  • 5. Solvency Analysis RATIOS LENNOVO LENNOVO HP HP (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010) Long Term Debt / Equity 0.00 0.18 0.58 0.38 Total Debt / Equity 0.14 0.22 0.79 0.55 Total Debt / Capital Employed 0.10 0.14 0.44 0.36 Proprietary ratio: (share holders funds / 0.17 0.18 0.30 0.32 total assets) Interpretation: Debt Equity Ratio: Here debt equity ratio is less in 2011 for Lenovo, which is good for the company as it shows the debt is paid much faster in that year. As compared to HP, Lenovo has a better financial position.
  • 6. Interpretation of solvency analysis RATIOS LENNOVO LENNOVO HP HP (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010) Proprietary ratio: (share holders 0.17 0.18 0.30 0.32 funds / total assets) Interpretation: Proprietary ratio: The standard proprietary ratio should be1:3. The higher the Proprietary ratio the stronger the financial position of the company is but neither of the company has been able to meet the standard ratio.
  • 7. Activity Ratio RATIOS LENOVO LENOVO HP HP (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010) Inventory Turnover Ratio: (COGS/Avg. 23.92 16.85 16.99 19.49 Stock) Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio: (Net 11.02 8.62 10.35 10.71 Sales/Fixed Assets) Total Asset Turnover Ratio: (Net 8.00 5.34 0.98 1.01 Sales/Total Asset) Capital Turnover Rate: (Sales/Capital 8.08 6.54 2.08 2.26 Employed)
  • 8. Interpretation of Activity Ratio RATIOS LENOVO LENOVO HP HP (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010) Inventory Turnover Ratio: (COGS/Avg. 23.92 16.85 16.99 19.49 Stock) Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio: (Net 11.02 8.62 10.35 10.71 Sales/Fixed Assets) Interpretation: Inventory Turnover Ratio: if the ratio is higher it is better for the company because it show that finished stock is rapidly turnover and low stock turnover is is not desirable because it show obsolete stock or carry too much of stock, so Lenovo is doing well than HP.  Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio: The higher the ratio is the better is the performance of the company and low ratio indicate that fixed assets are not being effectively utilized, so Lenovo is doing well in 2011.
  • 9. Interpretation of Activity Ratio RATIOS LENOVO LENOVO HP HP (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010) Total Asset Turnover Ratio: (Net 8.00 5.34 0.98 1.01 Sales/Total Asset) Capital Turnover Rate: (Sales/Capital 8.08 6.54 2.08 2.26 Employed) Interpretation: Total Asset Turnover Ratio: The higher the ratio is the higher will be the overtrading of total assets, while low ratio reveal idle capacity, so Lenovo is doing good in compare to HP. Capital Turnover Rate: The higher the ratio the greater are the profit and a low capital turnover ratio should be taken to mean sufficient sales are not being made and profit are low, so here Lenovo is doing good profit in 2011 and also in compare to HP.
  • 10. Profitability Analysis RATIOS LENOVO LENOVO HP HP (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010) Return On Equity: (Profit-Dividend Due To 0.148 0.080 0.183 0.216 Pref. Shareholder/Equity Share Capital) Return On Total Assets: (PBIT/Total 2.55 1.44 5.46 7.04 Asset)*100 Operating Profit Ratio: (Operating 1.77 1.32 7.61 9.11 Profit/Net Sales)*100 Net Profit Ratio: (Net Profit After Tax/Net 1.27 0.78 5.56 6.95 Sales)*100 Return on capital employed: 10.22 5.10 16.00 20.00 (PBIT/capital employed)*100 Earnings Per Share: (NPAT/No of equity 2.84 1.42 1.68 2.08 shares issued)
  • 11. Interpretation of Profitability Analysis RATIOS LENOVO LENOVO HP HP (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010) Return On Equity: (Profit-Dividend Due To 0.148 0.080 0.183 0.216 Pref. Shareholder/Equity Share Capital) Return On Total Assets: (PBIT/Total 2.55 1.44 5.46 7.04 Asset)*100 Operating Profit Ratio: (Operating 1.77 1.32 7.61 9.11 Profit/Net Sales)*100 Interpretation: Return On Equity: Over here Lenovo is doing good as the more they get return from the equity shareholder the more it is good for the company Return On Total Assets: The higher the ratio is the better it is for the company because the more the company get return from total asset the more is good for the firm. Operating Profit Ratio: Higher the ratio is the better it is for the company as it indicate the portion remain out of every rupee worth of sale after all operating cost expense have been met.
  • 12. Interpretation of Profitability Analysis RATIOS LENOVO LENOVO HP HP (2011) (2010) (2011) (2010) Net Profit Ratio: (Net Profit After 1.27 0.78 5.56 6.95 Tax/Net Sales)*100 Return on capital employed: 10.22 5.10 16.00 20.00 (PBIT/capital employed)*100 Earnings Per Share: (NPAT/No of 2.84 1.42 1.68 2.08 equity shares issued) Interpretation:  Net Profit Ratio: Higher the ratio is the better it is for the company because it give idea to improve the efficiency, Lenovo is doing good in 2011 compare to 2010 Return on capital employed: The higher the return on capital employed will be the higher the return on capital the company will get, Lenovo is doing good in 2011 Earnings Per Share: measures the profitability of a firm on per share basis