5. Traditional ILS vendors
Terms:
“legacy”
“proprietary”
Two types:
Founders still around
Founders have sold out to VCs
6. Traditional Vendors (continued)
Characteristics:
• Compiled code (machine readable code)
• Intellectual property laws apply
• They own the code and you rent it.
Advantages
• “turn key”
• comprehensive solution to many problems
• documentation and support
7. 1. Traditional Vendors (continued)
Disadvantages
• Slow development cycle
• One size may not fit all
• Who owns your data?
• Restrictive licenses
• Forced migrations
• vendor lockin
• (largely) old code
18. Some U.S. Public Library Stats
$ billions %
Top Quartile: 7.9 89
(Largest 25% by Total Expenditures)
Bottom Three Quartiles: 1.0 11
(Smallest 75% by Total Expenditures)
source: NCES/NCLIS FY2005
20. But there other new winds blowing:
• MassCat
• WALDO
• Indiana Open Source ILS Initiative (Evergreen Indiana)
• Michigan Library Consortium (Michigan Evergreen)
• SITKA
• University of Prince Edward Island
• Innisfil PL, Innisfil, Ontario
• National Resources Canada
21. What happens if your ILS won't do something you need?
Proprietary
• Wait until the next version
Open source
• Do it yourself (or with others in the community)
• Either pay someone yourself or get others to contribute
• Cajole, persuade, or charm someone into doing it
==> Community