SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 52
CellExtender®
Antenna System Design Guidelines
1. General
The design of an Antenna system for a CellExtender® site
needs to take into account the following specific factors:
a) The systems input and output frequencies can be
relatively close.
b) The Cell (output) channels are fixed, but the Donor
(RF Link) radios are frequency agile, as the channel
can vary from call to call (to follow the Donor sites
Traffic Channel allocation).
1. General
This Document is specially written to assist in
CellExtender® antenna system design.
As such, it is assumed that the reader has a good
understanding of standard antenna system design
techniques such as filter, multi coupler and other
combiner technologies, as issues discussed in this
document only relate to specific CellExtender application
aspects.
1. General
Matters such as elimination of Intermod products, etc.,
are not addressed in the context of this Document -
please refer to normal common standard techniques and
practices for these issues.
Please note that this Document provides design "Rules"
only.
Experience in antenna system design remains
indispensable in actual practice!
2. Frequency Separation - Cell Site MPT Channel
Selection
In any CellExtender® system the Cell radio Tx and Donor
radio Rx frequencies (and conversely, Cell Rx and Donor
Tx frequencies) will usually be in the same segment of
the frequency band.
For example, assume that the Donor Site Base Stations
transmit "High" and receive "Low". The CellExtender®
Donor radios will now be transmitting "Low" and
receiving "High".
2. Frequency Separation - Cell Site MPT Channel
Selection
However, like the original Donor Site, the CellExtender®
Cell Site Base radios will again transmit "High", and
receive "Low".
So, the CellExtender® input and output frequencies
operate in the same part of the frequency band and
hence, the frequency spacing between the various
transmitter and receiver frequencies can be much closer
than in a normal duplex situation.
2. Frequency Separation - Cell Site MPT Channel
Selection
For this reason care must be taken with the selection of
the Cell Control and Traffic channels, so as to achieve the
largest possible spacing between Cell Tx and Donor Rx
frequencies (and conversely, between Donor Rx and Cell
Tx frequencies).
Example:
In a 25 kHz channel spacing system the Donor Site MPT
Channels are:
DONOR SITE CHANNELS
MPT Ch. No. Tx Frequency Rx Frequency
Control Channel: Ch 100 350.000 MHz 360.000 MHz
Traffic Channels: Ch 120 350.500 MHz 360.500 MHz
Ch 140 351.000 MHz 361.000 MHz
Example:
Since the CellExtender® Donor Radios operate on the
reverse frequencies, the CellExtender® Donor radio
frequencies will be reversed:
CELLEXTENDER® DONOR RADIOS
MPT Ch. No. Tx Frequency Rx Frequency
Control Channel: Ch 100 360.000 MHz 350.000 MHz
Traffic Channels: Ch 120 360.500 MHz 350.500 MHz
Ch 140 361.000 MHz 351.000 MHz
Example:
Assume now that the Cell Channels were chosen as MPT
channels 130 and 121:
CELLEXTENDER® CELL RADIOS
MPT Ch. No. Tx Frequency Rx Frequency
Control Channel: Ch 130 350.750 MHz 360.750 MHz
Traffic Channels: Ch 121 350.525 MHz 360.525 MHz
Example:
Hence, when this CellExtender® system would process an
Intersite call on Donor System Traffic Channel 120, the
Cell Traffic Channel Tx would be transmitting on 350.525
MHz (Channel 121), whilst its companion CellExtender®
Donor (RF link) radio would be receiving on 350.500 MHz
(Channel 120), which is only 1 channel (25 kHz) spaced
away.
Such situations should of course be avoided wherever
possible: the larger the (worst case) frequency spacing,
the less critical the antenna system design will be.
Design Rule # 1
Always select the Cell Channels as
far away as possible from any of
the Donor channels.
3. CellExtender® Radio Frequency Agility - Impact on
Antenna Combiner Design
Basically, the Cell (System Output) channels always
operate on the same, fixed set of frequencies. Hence,
normal common Antenna Combiner practice (application
of cavity based multi couplers) applies equally to Cell Site
radio combining equipment.
However, the Donor (RF link) radios are "frequency
agile": they can be tuned to any Donor Site Traffic or
Control channel.
3. CellExtender® Radio Frequency Agility - Impact on
Antenna Combiner Design
This does not matter much for the Donor receivers, as
normal Rx splitter and/or amplifier techniques are readily
used for Donor receivers as well.
Filter based Transmitter Combiners however can
normally not be used for the Donor transmitters, as the
switching bandwidth (typically 1.5 to 2.5 MHz) will
generally be too wide for a standard filter based
combiner.
3. CellExtender® Radio Frequency Agility - Impact on
Antenna Combiner Design
Hence the Donor Transmit combiner is usually a passive,
wide band "hybrid combiner". Hybrid combiners are
simple, small and cost effective, but they are relatively
lossy (typical insertion loss for a 3-port combiner for
instance is 6.2 dB per path). This however is not a
problem for Donor transmitters as their link path to the
Donor site is point-to-point. (In fact, as we will conclude
in Section 6 of this Document, this attenuation is often an
advantage, as reduced Tx antenna input power reduces
Site desense and interference effects).
Design Rule # 2
Use normal cavity based combiners for
the Cell radio transmitters. Use (low
cost) hybrid combiners for the Donor
radio transmitters. Use standard Rx
splitters for the systems receivers.
4. Calculation of Required Antenna Isolation
Two different effects govern the requirements on a
CellExtender® antenna system design:
a) The radio's Receiver Selectivity which distinguishes
into:
- The "Adjacent Channel" (= Close In) Selectivity
- The "Blocking Performance" (= Selectivity spaced
further away)
4. Calculation of Required Antenna Isolation
b) The radio's Transmit Sideband Power, which also
breaks down in its "Adjacent Channel sideband
power", and its sideband power level further away
from the carrier.
For the purpose of this Document we will use the
following typical figures.
These parameters will be generally similar or better for
most types of radios.
4.1 Typical Radio Selectivity and Performance Figures
Frequency Spacing (kHz) Rx Selectivity Tx Sideband Power
Nil ("On Channel") 0 dB (reference) 0 dB (reference)
Adjacent Channel 75 dB - 75 dB (* Modulated!)
At 2 channel spacings 85 dB - 85 dB
At 1 MHz 100 dB - 100 dB
4.2 Isolation Calculations
Now let us assume the following typical Tx power levels
and minimum Rx input levels:
Donor Tx Power (*): + 30 dBm (1 Watt)
Cell Tx: + 46 dBm (50 Watts less
combiner losses)
Donor Rx Input Level (*): - 100 dBm (typical figure)
Minimum Workable Cell Rx Input level: - 115 dBm
(*) Note. Please refer to Section 6 for a further analysis of these parameters.
4.2 Isolation Calculations
The total path loss figures are now (Note *):
Donor Tx to Cell Rx: + 30 dBm + 115 dBm = 145 dB
Cell Tx to Donor Rx: + 46 dBm + 100 dBm = 146 dB
* Note. We are not addressing here the isolation required between Cell Tx and
Cell Rx, or Donor Tx and Donor Rx, which are governed by common standard
antenna system technologies (e.g. application of duplex filters or diplexers).
So, broadly, we need a total isolation of 145 dB for both
signal paths.
4.2 Isolation Calculations
As the system's input and output frequencies are
relatively close, we can not achieve much isolation by
filtering. In addition, Donor radio frequencies are
frequency agile, so filtering in this path is not possible at
all. Furthermore, whilst there are of course differences
between various makes and types of radios in terms of
“close in” RF performance, most radios have the same,
typical Rx selectivity and Tx out-of-band performance (to
meet the various Regulatory requirements). Hence, the
only tool available to work up a satisfactory overall RF
system isolation is to use the antenna isolation between
the systems Donor and Cell radio antennas.
4.2 Isolation Calculations
By deducting the radio's RF blocking and Tx sideband
power figures from the above overall total path figures
we can now obtain the "worst case" antenna isolation
required for the System:
For 1 channel spacing: 145 less 75 dB = 70 dB
At 2 channel spacings: 145 less 85 dB = 60 dB
At 1 MHz spacing: 145 less 100 dB = 45 dB
Note: We emphasise that these are broad, typical figures only, and these
parameters may differ from case to case in actual practice. However, the
numbers will give a good starting point for basic system design
4.2 Isolation Calculations
As a "rule of thumb" we can say that a typical isolation of
60 dB will provide adequate system performance. If a
"worst case" spacing of 1 channel is absolutely inevitable,
the isolation must be ideally be 70 dB or greater to
ensure satisfactory system performance. This level of
isolation can be achieved by adequate vertical antenna
spacing of the Cell and Donor antennas.
Design Rule # 3
The antenna system must be designed to
provide sufficient RF isolation between
Donor and Cell radio antennas. This is
generally achieved by perfect vertical
(exactly co-linear) spacing between these
antennas.
4.2 Isolation Calculations
The Table below gives typical Antenna Isolation figures as
a function of Vertical Spacing Distance.
Isolation (dB) Required Vertical Spacing
160 MHz 450 MHz 850 MHz
50: 8 meters 4 meters 2.5 meters
60: 11 meters 5.5 meters 3 meters
70: - 10 meters 6 meters
Note 1: The antennas must be EXACTLY co-linear, i.e. mounted precisely above
one another!!
Note 2: Source: Polar Industries, Melbourne, Australia
4.2 Isolation Calculations
These isolation figures are also applicable to High Gain
antennas, provided:
a) The spacing is measured between the physical center
of the antennas
b) The antennas are mounted directly above one
another, with no horizontal offset, that is, exactly co-
lineair)
4.2 Isolation Calculations
c) The spacing is at least one half of the signal's wave
length (this should always be the case for the
spacings in the above Table).
It should be noted that the obtainable isolation figures in
actual practice will also depend on tower construction,
proximity of other structures, etc.
4.3 Using Duplexers to combine Tx and Rx antenna
paths
It is not uncommon for CellExtender® antenna systems
to use a total of three, or even four antennas.
A typical 3-antenna system design for instance uses 2
transmit antennas, 1 for the Cell radio transmitters, 1 for
the Donor radio transmitters, and the third antenna is
the receive antenna used by both Cell and Donor
receivers (using a suitable splitter/amplifier system). A
typical 4-antenna system design uses separate antennas
for Donor and Cell receivers rather than a splitter system.
4.3 Using Duplexers to combine Tx and Rx antenna
paths
If there is plenty of “tower real estate” available on the
antenna mast, a multiple antenna system may well be
the most economical option. However, in most
applications the available tower space is limited and/or
restricted by other factors (like the proximity of other
antennas).
For that reason we generally recommend the use of
(standard) duplexers, to combine the transmit and
receiver paths for both Donor and Cell radios into
common antenna paths.
4.3 Using Duplexers to combine Tx and Rx antenna
paths
This will result in a better, more consistent and
predictable definition of the antenna system
performance in general, and also, will allow a much
increased worst case vertical spacing between Cell and
Donor antennas (as there are 2 only to take into account
as against 3 or 4 in the alternate case).
4.3 Using Duplexers to combine Tx and Rx antenna
paths
The Cell radio duplexer would generally be a high
performance, high power band pass type of duplexer, but
the Donor radio duplexer function can often be provided
by a simple, low cost “mobile” (notch) type of duplexer,
since the Donor radio RF transmit power is very limited
and also, increased losses, if within reason of course, do
not really matter much (may in fact help, see Section 6
below). Furthermore, the bandwidth of a simple notch
type duplexer is often still wide enough to cover the
frequency spread of the Donor channels (especially at
UHF frequencies).
Design Rule # 4
We recommend the use of
duplexers to combine Tx and Rx
paths, especially where tower real
estate is limited.
4.4 Use of High Gain antennas for Donor radios
It is obviously advantageous to use high gain antennas for
the Donor signal path:
a) The received Signal strength from the Donor site will
be much higher than would be the case otherwise.
This in turn means that the Cell Tx to Donor Rx
interference path is significantly less critical,
essentially reducing the required isolation figure by
the same amount as the antenna gain used.
4.4 Use of High Gain antennas for Donor radios
b) The actually radiated Donor Tx power can be reduced
by the same amount as the gain of the antenna (for
the same quality signal at the distant Donor Site). As
in case a) above, this means an equivalent reduction
in the required antenna isolation.
Design Rule # 5
Always use High Gain (Yagi)
antennas for the Donor radio path.
This reduces the required System
isolation figures by the same
amount as the antenna gain figure.
5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses
The radio link(s) to the Donor site are point-to-point
paths which in most cases, will be "Line of sight", or close
to it. Hence, we can in the first instance apply Free Space
attenuation figures for this path.
Typical Free Space Attenuation as a Function of
Horizontal Spacing (Path Distance).
Distance (KM) VHF (160 MHz) UHF (470 MHz)
25 100 dB 109 dB
40 104 dB 113 dB
80 114 dB 123 dB
5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses
A successful CellExtender® Antenna System design will
capitalise on the advantage of the point-to-point path
between Cell site and Donor site, resulting in the
relatively low path losses. Generally, there is no
advantage in being "better than best". That is, there is no
point transmitting back to a Donor site at a level of tens
of Watts if a few hundred mWatts (or less) is sufficient.
The advantage of not transmitting at excess power levels
is an equally diminished Site Interference potential (and
where applicable, reduced Site DC power consumption as
well).
5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses
The same applies to the reverse path - we know that the
Donor Site normally transmits at a full 50 Watt (or more)
power level, and our System design can safely take that
into account when calculating the minimum received
signal strength from the Donor site.
5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses
Assume an actual path loss of 120 dB (say, a distance of 40 KM at VHF, allowing
for some extra losses as well). We further assume Unity Gain antennas at the
Donor Site and 10dB Yagis at the Cell site. Hence, we can add a gain of 10 dB to
this path loss, i.e. the actual overall path attenuation is 120 less 10 = 110 dB.
For the Donor site to Cell site path we now get a Received Signal Strength of
+47dBm less 110 dB = - 73 dBm. A signal strength of (say) - 90 to -100 dBm is
more than adequate for most applications. So the excess margin of some 20 to
30 dB in the actually received signal strength will give a further substantial
margin against any possible Cell Tx to Donor Rx interference effects.
The reverse path: the case of Donor (RF link) radio key ups possibly affecting the
received Cell radio receiver signals is generally more critical. We want the Cell
Receiver to still operate OK, without any serious desense effects, at levels as low
as (say) - 120dBm, to achieve the best possible System coverage (sensitivity).
5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses
The desense effect by Donor transmitter key ups on Cell radio receivers is
directly dependent on the actually radiated Donor Transmit power level. So, the
lower the Donor radio transmit power level, the better the desense
performance.
To find the actually required minimum RF power level, we would conservatively
design for a receive level at the Donor site of (say) - 90dBm. Working again with
a typical path loss of 120 dB less 10 dB (for the antenna gain) = 100 dB between
Cell and Donor sites, the Donor Transmit level at the Cell site should be -90dBm
+ 110 dB = + 20 dBm, or 100 mWatts!
Most commonly used Donor radios can be adjusted to Tx output level as low as
a few Watts. With the attenuation of the Hybrid combiners in the Donor Tx path,
the actual radiated power level is therefore commonly around the 1 Watt level.
5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses
This may still be well in excess of what is actually required. Especially when RF
interference and/or desense effects are experienced in the Cell to Donor traffic
direction we recommend the use of a fixed attenuators in the Donor Tx antenna
line. Since the power at this point is limited to a few Watts only, a power rating
of 5 Watts, or even less, is generally more than adequate. Such attenuators are
of low cost and readily available from any common RF component supplier.
Design Rule # 6
To minimise Cell receiver desense effects caused by
Donor radio key ups, never operate Donor Transmitters
at power levels beyond what is needed for an (adequate)
minimum. This means that in actual practice the actually
radiated Donor radio transmitter power level will rarely
be in excess of a few hundred mWatts. Use external
attenuators to reduce actual EIRP levels if this can not be
achieved by the radios Tx power adjustment facility.
6. On Site Antenna System Testing
The following tests may be carried out to measure and
check the isolation of an actual antenna system. It
assumes availability of a suitable signal generator and
receiver device (e.g. an IFR Test Set or similar). Other
methods can be used as well (e.g. a Spectrum Analyser to
measure output levels and attenuation figures).
- Set the Test Receiver Mute to a typical threshold level
(e.g. 15 dB Sinad). The RF level of the Signal Generator
is noted ( A dBm).
6. On Site Antenna System Testing
- Now connect the RF signal generator to the Cell Tx
Antenna input. Connect at the input of the Tx
multicoupler.
- Connect the Test Receiver to the Donor Rx antenna.
Connect at the output of the Rx multicoupler.
- Slowly increase the RF level from the signal generator
until the Test receivers Mute breaks again. Note the
new level (B dBm).
6. On Site Antenna System Testing
The antenna isolation between Cell Trasnmitter and
Donor Receiver is now (B-A) dB.
- Repeat the above procedure for the opposite path (i.e.
Donor Tx to Cell Rx).
The isolation measured should be in the order of 60 dB
or greater. Experiment with the set up if/when necessary
to further improve the antenna isolation.
7. Summary of CellExtender® Antenna System Design
Rules
Design Rule # 1:
Always select the Cell Channels as far away as possible
from any of the Donor channels. Where possible, give the
Cell Control channel the "advantage".
Design Rule # 2:
Use normal cavity based combiners for the Cell radio
transmitters. Use (low cost) hybrid combiners for the
Donor radio transmitters. Use standard Rx splitters for
the systems receivers.
7. Summary of CellExtender® Antenna System Design
Rules
Design Rule # 3:
The antenna system must be designed to provide
sufficient RF isolation between Donor and Cell radio
antennas. This is generally achieved by perfect vertical
(exactly co-linear) spacing between these antennas.
Design Rule # 4:
We recommend the use of duplexers to combine Tx and
Rx paths, especially where tower real estate is limited.
7. Summary of CellExtender® Antenna System Design
Rules
Design Rule # 5:
Always use High Gain (Yagi) antennas for the Cell site to
Donor site path. This reduces the required System
isolation figures by about the same amount as the
antenna gain.
7. Summary of CellExtender® Antenna System Design
Rules
Design Rule # 6:
To minimise Cell receiver desense effects caused by
Donor radio key ups, never operate Donor Transmitters at
power levels beyond what is needed for an (adequate)
minimum. This means that in actual practice the actually
radiated Donor radio transmitter power level will rarely
be in excess of a few hundred mWatts. Use external
attenuators to reduce actual EIRP levels if this can not be
achieved by the radios Tx power adjust.
Radio Systems Technologies Pty Ltd
Phone: +61 3 9545 6333
Fax: +61 3 9543 6353
Email: sales@rstradio.com.au
Web: http://www.rstradio.com/
CellExtender®
Find out more online at
http://www.rstradio.com.au/products/cell-extender.html

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

The AM Receiver and Audio Amplification Project
The AM Receiver and Audio Amplification ProjectThe AM Receiver and Audio Amplification Project
The AM Receiver and Audio Amplification Project
 
Performance of spread spectrum system
Performance of spread spectrum systemPerformance of spread spectrum system
Performance of spread spectrum system
 
3rd qrtr p comm sc part 1
3rd qrtr p comm sc part 13rd qrtr p comm sc part 1
3rd qrtr p comm sc part 1
 
Superhetrodyne receiver
Superhetrodyne receiverSuperhetrodyne receiver
Superhetrodyne receiver
 
Receivers
ReceiversReceivers
Receivers
 
18629611 rf-and-gsm-fundamentals
18629611 rf-and-gsm-fundamentals18629611 rf-and-gsm-fundamentals
18629611 rf-and-gsm-fundamentals
 
Repeater
Repeater Repeater
Repeater
 
Radio receiver characteristics
Radio receiver characteristicsRadio receiver characteristics
Radio receiver characteristics
 
AM RadioReceiver
AM RadioReceiverAM RadioReceiver
AM RadioReceiver
 
Ac theory module08
Ac theory module08Ac theory module08
Ac theory module08
 
Wireless transmission
Wireless transmissionWireless transmission
Wireless transmission
 
Mfc
MfcMfc
Mfc
 
Spread spectrum modulation
Spread spectrum modulationSpread spectrum modulation
Spread spectrum modulation
 
Data encoding and modulation
Data encoding and modulationData encoding and modulation
Data encoding and modulation
 
OFDM
OFDMOFDM
OFDM
 
Introduction to RF & Wireless - Part 3
Introduction to RF & Wireless - Part 3Introduction to RF & Wireless - Part 3
Introduction to RF & Wireless - Part 3
 
Receivers in Analog Communication Systems
Receivers in Analog Communication SystemsReceivers in Analog Communication Systems
Receivers in Analog Communication Systems
 
Mfc
MfcMfc
Mfc
 
12012 ah apj rf fundamentals
12012 ah apj   rf fundamentals12012 ah apj   rf fundamentals
12012 ah apj rf fundamentals
 
Radio Frequency and Intermediate Frequency Amplifiers
Radio Frequency and Intermediate Frequency AmplifiersRadio Frequency and Intermediate Frequency Amplifiers
Radio Frequency and Intermediate Frequency Amplifiers
 

Similar to CellExtender® Antenna System Design Guidelines

Radio frequency power point presentation
Radio frequency power point presentationRadio frequency power point presentation
Radio frequency power point presentationprabalkalita13
 
Fundamental of Radio Frequency communications.ppt
Fundamental of Radio Frequency communications.pptFundamental of Radio Frequency communications.ppt
Fundamental of Radio Frequency communications.pptginanjaradi2
 
AM RECEIVERS 2.docx
AM RECEIVERS 2.docxAM RECEIVERS 2.docx
AM RECEIVERS 2.docxCyprianObota
 
Multiband Transceivers - [Chapter 6] Multi-mode and Multi-band Transceivers
Multiband Transceivers - [Chapter 6] Multi-mode and Multi-band TransceiversMultiband Transceivers - [Chapter 6] Multi-mode and Multi-band Transceivers
Multiband Transceivers - [Chapter 6] Multi-mode and Multi-band TransceiversSimen Li
 
Discover the magic
Discover the magicDiscover the magic
Discover the magicEnthalpyGuy
 
Efficient signal acquisition in multi channel neural systems
Efficient signal acquisition in multi channel neural systemsEfficient signal acquisition in multi channel neural systems
Efficient signal acquisition in multi channel neural systemsAshwath Krishnan
 
Light wave-system-3855513
Light wave-system-3855513Light wave-system-3855513
Light wave-system-3855513Pooja Shukla
 
Electronic instrumentation in NMT
Electronic instrumentation in NMTElectronic instrumentation in NMT
Electronic instrumentation in NMTSUMAN GOWNDER
 
Implementation of Simple Wireless Network
Implementation of Simple Wireless NetworkImplementation of Simple Wireless Network
Implementation of Simple Wireless NetworkNiko Simon
 
RF Basics, RF for Non-RF Engineers.pdf
RF Basics, RF for Non-RF Engineers.pdfRF Basics, RF for Non-RF Engineers.pdf
RF Basics, RF for Non-RF Engineers.pdfatsnoida3
 
Updated! Debugging EMI Problems Using a Digital Oscilloscope
Updated! Debugging EMI Problems Using a Digital OscilloscopeUpdated! Debugging EMI Problems Using a Digital Oscilloscope
Updated! Debugging EMI Problems Using a Digital OscilloscopeRohde & Schwarz North America
 
SYM Technology RF Spectrum Performance Analysis
SYM Technology RF Spectrum Performance AnalysisSYM Technology RF Spectrum Performance Analysis
SYM Technology RF Spectrum Performance AnalysisTodd Masters
 
12-edicon20185G Designing a Narrowband 28 GHz Band Pass Filter.pdf
12-edicon20185G Designing a Narrowband 28 GHz Band Pass Filter.pdf12-edicon20185G Designing a Narrowband 28 GHz Band Pass Filter.pdf
12-edicon20185G Designing a Narrowband 28 GHz Band Pass Filter.pdfessedikiftene
 

Similar to CellExtender® Antenna System Design Guidelines (20)

Radio frequency power point presentation
Radio frequency power point presentationRadio frequency power point presentation
Radio frequency power point presentation
 
Fundamental of Radio Frequency communications.ppt
Fundamental of Radio Frequency communications.pptFundamental of Radio Frequency communications.ppt
Fundamental of Radio Frequency communications.ppt
 
final pcj 1.pdf
final pcj 1.pdffinal pcj 1.pdf
final pcj 1.pdf
 
AM RECEIVERS 2.docx
AM RECEIVERS 2.docxAM RECEIVERS 2.docx
AM RECEIVERS 2.docx
 
Multiband Transceivers - [Chapter 6] Multi-mode and Multi-band Transceivers
Multiband Transceivers - [Chapter 6] Multi-mode and Multi-band TransceiversMultiband Transceivers - [Chapter 6] Multi-mode and Multi-band Transceivers
Multiband Transceivers - [Chapter 6] Multi-mode and Multi-band Transceivers
 
Mfc
MfcMfc
Mfc
 
Discover the magic
Discover the magicDiscover the magic
Discover the magic
 
Efficient signal acquisition in multi channel neural systems
Efficient signal acquisition in multi channel neural systemsEfficient signal acquisition in multi channel neural systems
Efficient signal acquisition in multi channel neural systems
 
Bandwidth optimization
Bandwidth optimizationBandwidth optimization
Bandwidth optimization
 
Light wave-system-3855513
Light wave-system-3855513Light wave-system-3855513
Light wave-system-3855513
 
Ac theory module08
Ac theory module08Ac theory module08
Ac theory module08
 
Electronic instrumentation in NMT
Electronic instrumentation in NMTElectronic instrumentation in NMT
Electronic instrumentation in NMT
 
Implementation of Simple Wireless Network
Implementation of Simple Wireless NetworkImplementation of Simple Wireless Network
Implementation of Simple Wireless Network
 
Mfc
MfcMfc
Mfc
 
Mfc
MfcMfc
Mfc
 
RF Basics, RF for Non-RF Engineers.pdf
RF Basics, RF for Non-RF Engineers.pdfRF Basics, RF for Non-RF Engineers.pdf
RF Basics, RF for Non-RF Engineers.pdf
 
Channel Modeling.pptx
Channel Modeling.pptxChannel Modeling.pptx
Channel Modeling.pptx
 
Updated! Debugging EMI Problems Using a Digital Oscilloscope
Updated! Debugging EMI Problems Using a Digital OscilloscopeUpdated! Debugging EMI Problems Using a Digital Oscilloscope
Updated! Debugging EMI Problems Using a Digital Oscilloscope
 
SYM Technology RF Spectrum Performance Analysis
SYM Technology RF Spectrum Performance AnalysisSYM Technology RF Spectrum Performance Analysis
SYM Technology RF Spectrum Performance Analysis
 
12-edicon20185G Designing a Narrowband 28 GHz Band Pass Filter.pdf
12-edicon20185G Designing a Narrowband 28 GHz Band Pass Filter.pdf12-edicon20185G Designing a Narrowband 28 GHz Band Pass Filter.pdf
12-edicon20185G Designing a Narrowband 28 GHz Band Pass Filter.pdf
 

More from Caroline Seawright

Ancient Egyptian Alcohol: Beer, Wine and the Festival of Drunkenness
Ancient Egyptian Alcohol: Beer, Wine and the Festival of DrunkennessAncient Egyptian Alcohol: Beer, Wine and the Festival of Drunkenness
Ancient Egyptian Alcohol: Beer, Wine and the Festival of DrunkennessCaroline Seawright
 
Hapi, Ancient Egyptian God of the Nile
Hapi, Ancient Egyptian God of the NileHapi, Ancient Egyptian God of the Nile
Hapi, Ancient Egyptian God of the NileCaroline Seawright
 
Isis, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Motherhood and Magic
Isis, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Motherhood and MagicIsis, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Motherhood and Magic
Isis, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Motherhood and MagicCaroline Seawright
 
Anubis, Ancient Egyptian God of Embalming and the Dead
Anubis, Ancient Egyptian God of Embalming and the DeadAnubis, Ancient Egyptian God of Embalming and the Dead
Anubis, Ancient Egyptian God of Embalming and the DeadCaroline Seawright
 
Bast, Ancient Egyptian Cat Goddess of Protection
Bast, Ancient Egyptian Cat Goddess of ProtectionBast, Ancient Egyptian Cat Goddess of Protection
Bast, Ancient Egyptian Cat Goddess of ProtectionCaroline Seawright
 
Hathor, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Love and Beauty
Hathor, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Love and BeautyHathor, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Love and Beauty
Hathor, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Love and BeautyCaroline Seawright
 

More from Caroline Seawright (8)

Have a wonderful Christmas
Have a wonderful ChristmasHave a wonderful Christmas
Have a wonderful Christmas
 
Egypt: Land of God Kings
Egypt: Land of God KingsEgypt: Land of God Kings
Egypt: Land of God Kings
 
Ancient Egyptian Alcohol: Beer, Wine and the Festival of Drunkenness
Ancient Egyptian Alcohol: Beer, Wine and the Festival of DrunkennessAncient Egyptian Alcohol: Beer, Wine and the Festival of Drunkenness
Ancient Egyptian Alcohol: Beer, Wine and the Festival of Drunkenness
 
Hapi, Ancient Egyptian God of the Nile
Hapi, Ancient Egyptian God of the NileHapi, Ancient Egyptian God of the Nile
Hapi, Ancient Egyptian God of the Nile
 
Isis, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Motherhood and Magic
Isis, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Motherhood and MagicIsis, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Motherhood and Magic
Isis, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Motherhood and Magic
 
Anubis, Ancient Egyptian God of Embalming and the Dead
Anubis, Ancient Egyptian God of Embalming and the DeadAnubis, Ancient Egyptian God of Embalming and the Dead
Anubis, Ancient Egyptian God of Embalming and the Dead
 
Bast, Ancient Egyptian Cat Goddess of Protection
Bast, Ancient Egyptian Cat Goddess of ProtectionBast, Ancient Egyptian Cat Goddess of Protection
Bast, Ancient Egyptian Cat Goddess of Protection
 
Hathor, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Love and Beauty
Hathor, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Love and BeautyHathor, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Love and Beauty
Hathor, Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Love and Beauty
 

Recently uploaded

Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLRuncy Oommen
 
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfMachine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfAijun Zhang
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding TeamAdam Moalla
 
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024SkyPlanner
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UbiTrack UK
 
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online CollaborationCOMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaborationbruanjhuli
 
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystemBird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystemAsko Soukka
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopBachir Benyammi
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IES VE
 
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesLinked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesDavid Newbury
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPathCommunity
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1DianaGray10
 
How Accurate are Carbon Emissions Projections?
How Accurate are Carbon Emissions Projections?How Accurate are Carbon Emissions Projections?
How Accurate are Carbon Emissions Projections?IES VE
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7DianaGray10
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAshyamraj55
 
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity WebinarAI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity WebinarPrecisely
 
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptxIntroduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptxMatsuo Lab
 
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdfPedro Manuel
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
 
20150722 - AGV
20150722 - AGV20150722 - AGV
20150722 - AGV
 
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfMachine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
 
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
 
20230104 - machine vision
20230104 - machine vision20230104 - machine vision
20230104 - machine vision
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
 
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online CollaborationCOMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
 
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystemBird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
 
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesLinked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
 
How Accurate are Carbon Emissions Projections?
How Accurate are Carbon Emissions Projections?How Accurate are Carbon Emissions Projections?
How Accurate are Carbon Emissions Projections?
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
 
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity WebinarAI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
 
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptxIntroduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
 
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
 

CellExtender® Antenna System Design Guidelines

  • 2. 1. General The design of an Antenna system for a CellExtender® site needs to take into account the following specific factors: a) The systems input and output frequencies can be relatively close. b) The Cell (output) channels are fixed, but the Donor (RF Link) radios are frequency agile, as the channel can vary from call to call (to follow the Donor sites Traffic Channel allocation).
  • 3. 1. General This Document is specially written to assist in CellExtender® antenna system design. As such, it is assumed that the reader has a good understanding of standard antenna system design techniques such as filter, multi coupler and other combiner technologies, as issues discussed in this document only relate to specific CellExtender application aspects.
  • 4. 1. General Matters such as elimination of Intermod products, etc., are not addressed in the context of this Document - please refer to normal common standard techniques and practices for these issues. Please note that this Document provides design "Rules" only. Experience in antenna system design remains indispensable in actual practice!
  • 5. 2. Frequency Separation - Cell Site MPT Channel Selection In any CellExtender® system the Cell radio Tx and Donor radio Rx frequencies (and conversely, Cell Rx and Donor Tx frequencies) will usually be in the same segment of the frequency band. For example, assume that the Donor Site Base Stations transmit "High" and receive "Low". The CellExtender® Donor radios will now be transmitting "Low" and receiving "High".
  • 6. 2. Frequency Separation - Cell Site MPT Channel Selection However, like the original Donor Site, the CellExtender® Cell Site Base radios will again transmit "High", and receive "Low". So, the CellExtender® input and output frequencies operate in the same part of the frequency band and hence, the frequency spacing between the various transmitter and receiver frequencies can be much closer than in a normal duplex situation.
  • 7. 2. Frequency Separation - Cell Site MPT Channel Selection For this reason care must be taken with the selection of the Cell Control and Traffic channels, so as to achieve the largest possible spacing between Cell Tx and Donor Rx frequencies (and conversely, between Donor Rx and Cell Tx frequencies).
  • 8. Example: In a 25 kHz channel spacing system the Donor Site MPT Channels are: DONOR SITE CHANNELS MPT Ch. No. Tx Frequency Rx Frequency Control Channel: Ch 100 350.000 MHz 360.000 MHz Traffic Channels: Ch 120 350.500 MHz 360.500 MHz Ch 140 351.000 MHz 361.000 MHz
  • 9. Example: Since the CellExtender® Donor Radios operate on the reverse frequencies, the CellExtender® Donor radio frequencies will be reversed: CELLEXTENDER® DONOR RADIOS MPT Ch. No. Tx Frequency Rx Frequency Control Channel: Ch 100 360.000 MHz 350.000 MHz Traffic Channels: Ch 120 360.500 MHz 350.500 MHz Ch 140 361.000 MHz 351.000 MHz
  • 10. Example: Assume now that the Cell Channels were chosen as MPT channels 130 and 121: CELLEXTENDER® CELL RADIOS MPT Ch. No. Tx Frequency Rx Frequency Control Channel: Ch 130 350.750 MHz 360.750 MHz Traffic Channels: Ch 121 350.525 MHz 360.525 MHz
  • 11. Example: Hence, when this CellExtender® system would process an Intersite call on Donor System Traffic Channel 120, the Cell Traffic Channel Tx would be transmitting on 350.525 MHz (Channel 121), whilst its companion CellExtender® Donor (RF link) radio would be receiving on 350.500 MHz (Channel 120), which is only 1 channel (25 kHz) spaced away. Such situations should of course be avoided wherever possible: the larger the (worst case) frequency spacing, the less critical the antenna system design will be.
  • 12. Design Rule # 1 Always select the Cell Channels as far away as possible from any of the Donor channels.
  • 13. 3. CellExtender® Radio Frequency Agility - Impact on Antenna Combiner Design Basically, the Cell (System Output) channels always operate on the same, fixed set of frequencies. Hence, normal common Antenna Combiner practice (application of cavity based multi couplers) applies equally to Cell Site radio combining equipment. However, the Donor (RF link) radios are "frequency agile": they can be tuned to any Donor Site Traffic or Control channel.
  • 14. 3. CellExtender® Radio Frequency Agility - Impact on Antenna Combiner Design This does not matter much for the Donor receivers, as normal Rx splitter and/or amplifier techniques are readily used for Donor receivers as well. Filter based Transmitter Combiners however can normally not be used for the Donor transmitters, as the switching bandwidth (typically 1.5 to 2.5 MHz) will generally be too wide for a standard filter based combiner.
  • 15. 3. CellExtender® Radio Frequency Agility - Impact on Antenna Combiner Design Hence the Donor Transmit combiner is usually a passive, wide band "hybrid combiner". Hybrid combiners are simple, small and cost effective, but they are relatively lossy (typical insertion loss for a 3-port combiner for instance is 6.2 dB per path). This however is not a problem for Donor transmitters as their link path to the Donor site is point-to-point. (In fact, as we will conclude in Section 6 of this Document, this attenuation is often an advantage, as reduced Tx antenna input power reduces Site desense and interference effects).
  • 16. Design Rule # 2 Use normal cavity based combiners for the Cell radio transmitters. Use (low cost) hybrid combiners for the Donor radio transmitters. Use standard Rx splitters for the systems receivers.
  • 17. 4. Calculation of Required Antenna Isolation Two different effects govern the requirements on a CellExtender® antenna system design: a) The radio's Receiver Selectivity which distinguishes into: - The "Adjacent Channel" (= Close In) Selectivity - The "Blocking Performance" (= Selectivity spaced further away)
  • 18. 4. Calculation of Required Antenna Isolation b) The radio's Transmit Sideband Power, which also breaks down in its "Adjacent Channel sideband power", and its sideband power level further away from the carrier. For the purpose of this Document we will use the following typical figures. These parameters will be generally similar or better for most types of radios.
  • 19. 4.1 Typical Radio Selectivity and Performance Figures Frequency Spacing (kHz) Rx Selectivity Tx Sideband Power Nil ("On Channel") 0 dB (reference) 0 dB (reference) Adjacent Channel 75 dB - 75 dB (* Modulated!) At 2 channel spacings 85 dB - 85 dB At 1 MHz 100 dB - 100 dB
  • 20. 4.2 Isolation Calculations Now let us assume the following typical Tx power levels and minimum Rx input levels: Donor Tx Power (*): + 30 dBm (1 Watt) Cell Tx: + 46 dBm (50 Watts less combiner losses) Donor Rx Input Level (*): - 100 dBm (typical figure) Minimum Workable Cell Rx Input level: - 115 dBm (*) Note. Please refer to Section 6 for a further analysis of these parameters.
  • 21. 4.2 Isolation Calculations The total path loss figures are now (Note *): Donor Tx to Cell Rx: + 30 dBm + 115 dBm = 145 dB Cell Tx to Donor Rx: + 46 dBm + 100 dBm = 146 dB * Note. We are not addressing here the isolation required between Cell Tx and Cell Rx, or Donor Tx and Donor Rx, which are governed by common standard antenna system technologies (e.g. application of duplex filters or diplexers). So, broadly, we need a total isolation of 145 dB for both signal paths.
  • 22. 4.2 Isolation Calculations As the system's input and output frequencies are relatively close, we can not achieve much isolation by filtering. In addition, Donor radio frequencies are frequency agile, so filtering in this path is not possible at all. Furthermore, whilst there are of course differences between various makes and types of radios in terms of “close in” RF performance, most radios have the same, typical Rx selectivity and Tx out-of-band performance (to meet the various Regulatory requirements). Hence, the only tool available to work up a satisfactory overall RF system isolation is to use the antenna isolation between the systems Donor and Cell radio antennas.
  • 23. 4.2 Isolation Calculations By deducting the radio's RF blocking and Tx sideband power figures from the above overall total path figures we can now obtain the "worst case" antenna isolation required for the System: For 1 channel spacing: 145 less 75 dB = 70 dB At 2 channel spacings: 145 less 85 dB = 60 dB At 1 MHz spacing: 145 less 100 dB = 45 dB Note: We emphasise that these are broad, typical figures only, and these parameters may differ from case to case in actual practice. However, the numbers will give a good starting point for basic system design
  • 24. 4.2 Isolation Calculations As a "rule of thumb" we can say that a typical isolation of 60 dB will provide adequate system performance. If a "worst case" spacing of 1 channel is absolutely inevitable, the isolation must be ideally be 70 dB or greater to ensure satisfactory system performance. This level of isolation can be achieved by adequate vertical antenna spacing of the Cell and Donor antennas.
  • 25. Design Rule # 3 The antenna system must be designed to provide sufficient RF isolation between Donor and Cell radio antennas. This is generally achieved by perfect vertical (exactly co-linear) spacing between these antennas.
  • 26. 4.2 Isolation Calculations The Table below gives typical Antenna Isolation figures as a function of Vertical Spacing Distance. Isolation (dB) Required Vertical Spacing 160 MHz 450 MHz 850 MHz 50: 8 meters 4 meters 2.5 meters 60: 11 meters 5.5 meters 3 meters 70: - 10 meters 6 meters Note 1: The antennas must be EXACTLY co-linear, i.e. mounted precisely above one another!! Note 2: Source: Polar Industries, Melbourne, Australia
  • 27. 4.2 Isolation Calculations These isolation figures are also applicable to High Gain antennas, provided: a) The spacing is measured between the physical center of the antennas b) The antennas are mounted directly above one another, with no horizontal offset, that is, exactly co- lineair)
  • 28. 4.2 Isolation Calculations c) The spacing is at least one half of the signal's wave length (this should always be the case for the spacings in the above Table). It should be noted that the obtainable isolation figures in actual practice will also depend on tower construction, proximity of other structures, etc.
  • 29. 4.3 Using Duplexers to combine Tx and Rx antenna paths It is not uncommon for CellExtender® antenna systems to use a total of three, or even four antennas. A typical 3-antenna system design for instance uses 2 transmit antennas, 1 for the Cell radio transmitters, 1 for the Donor radio transmitters, and the third antenna is the receive antenna used by both Cell and Donor receivers (using a suitable splitter/amplifier system). A typical 4-antenna system design uses separate antennas for Donor and Cell receivers rather than a splitter system.
  • 30. 4.3 Using Duplexers to combine Tx and Rx antenna paths If there is plenty of “tower real estate” available on the antenna mast, a multiple antenna system may well be the most economical option. However, in most applications the available tower space is limited and/or restricted by other factors (like the proximity of other antennas). For that reason we generally recommend the use of (standard) duplexers, to combine the transmit and receiver paths for both Donor and Cell radios into common antenna paths.
  • 31. 4.3 Using Duplexers to combine Tx and Rx antenna paths This will result in a better, more consistent and predictable definition of the antenna system performance in general, and also, will allow a much increased worst case vertical spacing between Cell and Donor antennas (as there are 2 only to take into account as against 3 or 4 in the alternate case).
  • 32. 4.3 Using Duplexers to combine Tx and Rx antenna paths The Cell radio duplexer would generally be a high performance, high power band pass type of duplexer, but the Donor radio duplexer function can often be provided by a simple, low cost “mobile” (notch) type of duplexer, since the Donor radio RF transmit power is very limited and also, increased losses, if within reason of course, do not really matter much (may in fact help, see Section 6 below). Furthermore, the bandwidth of a simple notch type duplexer is often still wide enough to cover the frequency spread of the Donor channels (especially at UHF frequencies).
  • 33. Design Rule # 4 We recommend the use of duplexers to combine Tx and Rx paths, especially where tower real estate is limited.
  • 34. 4.4 Use of High Gain antennas for Donor radios It is obviously advantageous to use high gain antennas for the Donor signal path: a) The received Signal strength from the Donor site will be much higher than would be the case otherwise. This in turn means that the Cell Tx to Donor Rx interference path is significantly less critical, essentially reducing the required isolation figure by the same amount as the antenna gain used.
  • 35. 4.4 Use of High Gain antennas for Donor radios b) The actually radiated Donor Tx power can be reduced by the same amount as the gain of the antenna (for the same quality signal at the distant Donor Site). As in case a) above, this means an equivalent reduction in the required antenna isolation.
  • 36. Design Rule # 5 Always use High Gain (Yagi) antennas for the Donor radio path. This reduces the required System isolation figures by the same amount as the antenna gain figure.
  • 37. 5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses The radio link(s) to the Donor site are point-to-point paths which in most cases, will be "Line of sight", or close to it. Hence, we can in the first instance apply Free Space attenuation figures for this path. Typical Free Space Attenuation as a Function of Horizontal Spacing (Path Distance). Distance (KM) VHF (160 MHz) UHF (470 MHz) 25 100 dB 109 dB 40 104 dB 113 dB 80 114 dB 123 dB
  • 38. 5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses A successful CellExtender® Antenna System design will capitalise on the advantage of the point-to-point path between Cell site and Donor site, resulting in the relatively low path losses. Generally, there is no advantage in being "better than best". That is, there is no point transmitting back to a Donor site at a level of tens of Watts if a few hundred mWatts (or less) is sufficient. The advantage of not transmitting at excess power levels is an equally diminished Site Interference potential (and where applicable, reduced Site DC power consumption as well).
  • 39. 5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses The same applies to the reverse path - we know that the Donor Site normally transmits at a full 50 Watt (or more) power level, and our System design can safely take that into account when calculating the minimum received signal strength from the Donor site.
  • 40. 5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses Assume an actual path loss of 120 dB (say, a distance of 40 KM at VHF, allowing for some extra losses as well). We further assume Unity Gain antennas at the Donor Site and 10dB Yagis at the Cell site. Hence, we can add a gain of 10 dB to this path loss, i.e. the actual overall path attenuation is 120 less 10 = 110 dB. For the Donor site to Cell site path we now get a Received Signal Strength of +47dBm less 110 dB = - 73 dBm. A signal strength of (say) - 90 to -100 dBm is more than adequate for most applications. So the excess margin of some 20 to 30 dB in the actually received signal strength will give a further substantial margin against any possible Cell Tx to Donor Rx interference effects. The reverse path: the case of Donor (RF link) radio key ups possibly affecting the received Cell radio receiver signals is generally more critical. We want the Cell Receiver to still operate OK, without any serious desense effects, at levels as low as (say) - 120dBm, to achieve the best possible System coverage (sensitivity).
  • 41. 5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses The desense effect by Donor transmitter key ups on Cell radio receivers is directly dependent on the actually radiated Donor Transmit power level. So, the lower the Donor radio transmit power level, the better the desense performance. To find the actually required minimum RF power level, we would conservatively design for a receive level at the Donor site of (say) - 90dBm. Working again with a typical path loss of 120 dB less 10 dB (for the antenna gain) = 100 dB between Cell and Donor sites, the Donor Transmit level at the Cell site should be -90dBm + 110 dB = + 20 dBm, or 100 mWatts! Most commonly used Donor radios can be adjusted to Tx output level as low as a few Watts. With the attenuation of the Hybrid combiners in the Donor Tx path, the actual radiated power level is therefore commonly around the 1 Watt level.
  • 42. 5. Donor Radio Signal Path Losses This may still be well in excess of what is actually required. Especially when RF interference and/or desense effects are experienced in the Cell to Donor traffic direction we recommend the use of a fixed attenuators in the Donor Tx antenna line. Since the power at this point is limited to a few Watts only, a power rating of 5 Watts, or even less, is generally more than adequate. Such attenuators are of low cost and readily available from any common RF component supplier.
  • 43. Design Rule # 6 To minimise Cell receiver desense effects caused by Donor radio key ups, never operate Donor Transmitters at power levels beyond what is needed for an (adequate) minimum. This means that in actual practice the actually radiated Donor radio transmitter power level will rarely be in excess of a few hundred mWatts. Use external attenuators to reduce actual EIRP levels if this can not be achieved by the radios Tx power adjustment facility.
  • 44. 6. On Site Antenna System Testing The following tests may be carried out to measure and check the isolation of an actual antenna system. It assumes availability of a suitable signal generator and receiver device (e.g. an IFR Test Set or similar). Other methods can be used as well (e.g. a Spectrum Analyser to measure output levels and attenuation figures). - Set the Test Receiver Mute to a typical threshold level (e.g. 15 dB Sinad). The RF level of the Signal Generator is noted ( A dBm).
  • 45. 6. On Site Antenna System Testing - Now connect the RF signal generator to the Cell Tx Antenna input. Connect at the input of the Tx multicoupler. - Connect the Test Receiver to the Donor Rx antenna. Connect at the output of the Rx multicoupler. - Slowly increase the RF level from the signal generator until the Test receivers Mute breaks again. Note the new level (B dBm).
  • 46. 6. On Site Antenna System Testing The antenna isolation between Cell Trasnmitter and Donor Receiver is now (B-A) dB. - Repeat the above procedure for the opposite path (i.e. Donor Tx to Cell Rx). The isolation measured should be in the order of 60 dB or greater. Experiment with the set up if/when necessary to further improve the antenna isolation.
  • 47. 7. Summary of CellExtender® Antenna System Design Rules Design Rule # 1: Always select the Cell Channels as far away as possible from any of the Donor channels. Where possible, give the Cell Control channel the "advantage". Design Rule # 2: Use normal cavity based combiners for the Cell radio transmitters. Use (low cost) hybrid combiners for the Donor radio transmitters. Use standard Rx splitters for the systems receivers.
  • 48. 7. Summary of CellExtender® Antenna System Design Rules Design Rule # 3: The antenna system must be designed to provide sufficient RF isolation between Donor and Cell radio antennas. This is generally achieved by perfect vertical (exactly co-linear) spacing between these antennas. Design Rule # 4: We recommend the use of duplexers to combine Tx and Rx paths, especially where tower real estate is limited.
  • 49. 7. Summary of CellExtender® Antenna System Design Rules Design Rule # 5: Always use High Gain (Yagi) antennas for the Cell site to Donor site path. This reduces the required System isolation figures by about the same amount as the antenna gain.
  • 50. 7. Summary of CellExtender® Antenna System Design Rules Design Rule # 6: To minimise Cell receiver desense effects caused by Donor radio key ups, never operate Donor Transmitters at power levels beyond what is needed for an (adequate) minimum. This means that in actual practice the actually radiated Donor radio transmitter power level will rarely be in excess of a few hundred mWatts. Use external attenuators to reduce actual EIRP levels if this can not be achieved by the radios Tx power adjust.
  • 51. Radio Systems Technologies Pty Ltd Phone: +61 3 9545 6333 Fax: +61 3 9543 6353 Email: sales@rstradio.com.au Web: http://www.rstradio.com/
  • 52. CellExtender® Find out more online at http://www.rstradio.com.au/products/cell-extender.html