Presentation by Sean Parker

1. THE NEW ERA OF
THE NETWORK SERVICE
Sean Parker
Web 2.0 Summit
October 22, 2009

2. THE NEW ERA OF
THE NETWORK SERVICE
Why companies like Facebook, Twitter,
Ebay and Apple (but not Google) will
determine the future of the internet
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 2

3. COMPANIES THAT HARNESS
THE POWER OF NETWORKS
WILL DOMINATE THE INTERNET
COLLECTING DATA IS LESS
VALUABLE THAN CONNECTING
PEOPLE
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 3

4. WHAT ARE NETWORK EFFECTS?
“When the value of a product to
one user depends on how many
other users there are.”
- Shapiro, Varian
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 4

5. THE POWER OF NETWORKS
• Option Value
• Expected value of potential connections
between nodes
• Action Network Value
• Real value of active connections
between nodes
• Switching Cost
• Cost of switching networks for any
single user or group of users
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 5

6. THE POWER OF NETWORKS
• Network effects produce
winner-take-all markets
• The big get bigger
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 6

7. METCALFE’S LAW
value
increases
with n 2
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 7

8. METCALFE’S LAW
Potential Value of Network
increases with n 2
Size of Network (n)
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 8

9. WHAT IS A NETWORK COMPANY?
Basic unit of value for a network company is not
the data it stores, it’s the number of connections
it facilitates
Communication
Marketplaces Networks Games Platforms
eBay Facebook World of Warcraft Apple iPhone
Craigslist Twitter Zynga Facebook
Skype Foursquare
LinkedIn
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 9

10. INFORMATIONS SERVICES
VS. NETWORK SERVICES
• Information Services
• Google, Yahoo!, CNET, YouTube, MSN
• Core value is collecting and processing
data
• Network Services
• Facebook, Twitter, Ebay, PayPal
• Core value is facilitating a relationship
between people or groups
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 10

11. • Craigslist
• MySpace
• AIM
• Ebay
THE BEST PRODUCT DOESN’T ALWAYS WIN
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 11

12. A NATURAL MONOPOLY: EBAY
Registered Users (MM)
3
2
Onsale
ebay
1
Q1 1998 Q2 1998 Q3 1998 Q4 1998
Source: Company Filings
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 12

13. A NATURAL MONOPOLY: EBAY
Registered Users (MM)
300
225
150
ebay
75
0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Source: Company Filings
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 13

14. “A MONKEY COULD RUN THIS BUSINESS”
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 14

15. WHY DID EBAY BUY SKYPE?
Purchase Price in 2005: $2.6B
• 75mm Registered
• $70mm Revenue
Purchase Price 2009: ?
• 521mm Registered
• $740mm Annualized
Revenue
Source: Company Filings
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 15

16. THE FALL OF FRIENDSTER
• Social networks are communication
services, they obey the laws of
networks
• Friendster was not a fad
• The company failed due to
difficulties scaling the infrastructure
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 16

17. THE FALL OF FRIENDSTER
Search Index Volume
10
friendster
myspace
hi5
8
5
3
Source: Google Trends
2004
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 17

18. FACEBOOK VS. MYSPACE
Unique Visitors (MM)
150
Facebook
Myspace
113
75
38
9/07 11/07 1/08 3/08 5/08 7/08 9/08 11/08 1/09 3/09 5/09 7/09 9/09
Source: comScore Media Metrix
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 18

19. HOW THE HELL DID MYSPACE
LET THIS HAPPEN?
2005
• Facebook: 8mm users
• MySpace: 60-100mm users
• Systematic product failure
• Technical limitations
• Facebook had a secure beachhead in
college market
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 19

20. CAMPUS WARFARE
Win 1
Win 2
Facebook Schools
Berkeley Enemy Schools Tactical Schools
Columbia Baylor Southwestern
Cornell Columbia Texas A&M
Dartmouth Stanford UTA
Harvard
Stanford Columbia Baylor
Yale Win 1 Stanford Win 2
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 20

21. BATTLE FOR GERMANY
Unique Visitors (MM)
20,000
15,000
StudiVZ Sites
10,000
Facebook
5,000
0
7/1/08 9/1/08 11/1/08 1/1/09 3/1/09 5/1/09 7/1/09 9/1/09
Source: comScore Media Metrix
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 21

22. BATTLE FOR GERMANY
Search Index Volume
StudiVZ Sites
Facebook
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: Google Trends
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 22

23. DATA PORTABILITY IS A RED HERRING
• Value of connections is super-linear, value
of datasets is linear at best
• Moving data is hard, moving people is
harder
• Example: ebay’s auction database
• Data portability is easily solved by
converters and adapters.
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 23

24. GOOGLE DOESN’T OWN
NETWORKS
NETWORK INFORMATION
SERVICES SERVICES
• AdSense • AdWords
• Dodgeball(?) • Gmail
• Orkut • Search
• Google Talk(?), Wave(?) • Maps, etc.
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 24

25. CLOSING THOUGHTS
1. Over the next decade the aggregate value of the
emerging class of network companies will
dominate the internet
2. NEW economic value on the internet will not be
generated by search
3. Google will continue to be an economic
powerhouse but its relative importance on the
internet will decline
Web 2.0 Summit, 2009 - The New Era of the Network Service 25