A culture of myths
•Télécharger en tant que PPT, PDF•
2 j'aime•1,030 vues
Rockford Greene International presents Phil La Duke at the Michigan Safety Conference at 9:00 a.m. on April 20, 2011 in Lansing, MI If you enjoyed this presentation you may also enjoy the Rockford Greene International website www.rockfordgreene.com or the Rockford Greene blog www.rockfordgreeneinternational.wordpress.com
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Plus de Phil La Duke
Plus de Phil La Duke (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
A culture of myths
- 1. Rockford Greene International Presents:
- 2. A Culture Of Myths Phil La Duke
- 4. Myth #1: Safety Is Our Number One Priority
- 5. Myth #2: Safety Rules Are In Place For Your Protection
- 6. Myth #3: We Can Eliminate All Injuries By Mistake-proofing Our Workplace
- 7. Myth #4: All Hazards Were Created Equal
- 8. Myth #5: Safety Can Be Achieved Through A Program That Encourages People To Work More Safely
- 9. Myth #6: We Will Fire You For Acting Unsafely
- 10. Myth #7: Comparing Ourselves To Industry Average Is Useful For Gauging Our Safety Performance
- 11. Myth #8: Our Goal Is Zero Injuries
- 12. Myth 9: Some Companies Don’t Have A Safety Culture
Notes de l'éditeur
- This presentation was first made by Phil La Duke at the Michigan Safety Conference on April 20, 2011 at the Lansing Convention Center. For information on Rockford Greene International, or to request Phil La Duke visit www.rockfordgreeneinternational.com
- This presentation is based on the article, A Culture of Myths by Phil La Duke that was published in the October, 2010 edition of Fabricating and Metalworking © magazine.
- When I first conceived and pitched the idea of an article regarding the basic untruths perpetuated by safety professionals I called the article A Culture of Lies. My editor and I discussed the obviously and deliberately charged title and the acerbic tone and decided to soften it a bit. Not to compromise the journalistic integrity, but because we agreed that there is a big difference between an out and out lie, and a myth. The first title was more provocative, and truthfully I liked it better, but a myth better describes my intent. Let’s talk about the difference between a myth and a lie: Lies… are a deliberate attempt to deceive another are typically used to take advantage of another is told by someone who knows that is untrue Myths… are untrue are used to comfort us explain things that are difficult to understand This presentation will explore some of the most common myths that safety professional perpetuate. There continues to be substantial debate on the hows and whys of establishing a safety culture. The debate is not unlike the debate about Quality that raged in the early 80s, but unfortunately there tends to be an alarming trend away from the insights and solid management practices produced by this debate and gravitation toward safety platitudes instead. If we are going to enhance and improve our safety cultures we have to build our credibility and to do that we have to stop perpetuating myths in the organization.
- Myth 1: Safety is our number one priority. Show me a company that truly has safety as its number one priority and I will show you a company that will quickly go broke. The reality is that safety is NOT any company’s number one priority, nor should it be. Companies exist to make money—not to keep workers safe. (Even not-for-profit organizations exist for some purpose other than simply to keep its workers safe.) The world’s safest companies recognize that maintaining an unsafe workplace is bad business, and companies that make bad business decisions cannot fulfill their primary purpose of making money (or making the world a better place, or achieve any other measure of success.) Safety professionals have to stop perpetuating this myth because the organization knows it’s a myth and if we continue perpetuate it the organization will never find anything we say credible. Instead of claiming that safety is our number one priority we should instead honestly admit that our number one priority is to run an efficient and profitable business, but doing so is only possible when we have made every effort to make certain that all our business processes are safe, produce high quality goods and services, and delight our customers.
- Myth 2: All Safety Rules are In Place for Your Protection Whenever a particularly persnickety worker complains about a safety rule many of us shrug and respond with a “these rules are in place for your protection” and while that is true in a lot of cases in many other cases it’s a myth and the worker knows it. Often, safety rules are created to address a compliance issue that has little to do with the safety of a given worker. In other cases we expand the scope of a rule to cover a much wider population than is required simply because it makes the rule easier to enforce globally. Take PPE, for example. In many organizations there are relatively few jobs that require PPE and yet many of them require wall-to-wall compliance. I’m not saying that wall-to-wall requirements are a bad idea, or that companies are wrong for easing their abilities to enforce safety policies, but we have to stop telling workers that we have these rules for their protection when the truth is we are trying to make our lives easier or trying to comply with a regulation; people know the difference.
- Myth 3: We Can Eliminate All Injuries By Mistake-Proofing Our Workplace. Removing the physical hazards from our workforce should be a top priority; elimination of the hazard is at the top of the Hierarchy of Controls and is universally accepted as the most effective way to make a job safer. But the propensity for people to make errors and the variability endemic to human behavior makes it impossible to completely eliminate mistakes or more to the point, injuries caused by these mistakes. The term “mistake proofing” itself is something of a misnomer. Mistake proofing grew out of lean manufacturing and it refers to engineering failure mode and while this is a lovely thought, this doesn’t truly prevent mistakes, rather, it mitigates the consequences typically associated with those mistakes. Mitigating the consequences of mistakes is a key part of safety and since the tendency of people to make mistakes is well documented we must make a much greater effort to protect people from their mistakes and the mistakes of others. Unfortunately, we tend to punish people for making mistakes, either through disciplinary action or by characterizing those who make mistake as stupid. Mistakes are seldom indicative of the intelligence of the people who make them.
- Myth 4: All Hazards Were Created Equal Even though few people believe that a hazard is a hazard is a hazard, many of safety management processes treat hazards as if they all represent the same risk of injury. Furthermore, many safety software packages don’t allow the user to prioritize one safety hazard over another. If an organization is diligent in its efforts to ferret out hazards it will quickly find hundreds or even thousands of hazards. Unless organizations learn to effectively prioritize and concentrate on the critical few hazards the system will quickly be overwhelmed and collapse.
- Myth 5: Safety Can Be Achieved Through A Program That Encourages People To Work More Safely Fortunes have been made selling organizations safety systems that reward people for working safely. While many of these systems do result in short term reductions in injury rates, there is growing skepticism of the long-term effectiveness of these approaches and concerns that these programs may merely reduce injury rates by encouraging under reporting. Since nobody wants to get hurt and your systems aren’t designed to hurt people, companies need to focus on fixing the problem not the blame.
- Myth 6: We will fire you for acting unsafely. Most employee handbooks talk tough when it comes to safety. Open your average policy manual and you’ll likely find an ominous stricture that you will face discipline up to and including termination (which has always sounded more like they were threatening to kill me that to fire me.) But in practical terms people seldom get fired (or even disciplined) for acting unsafely unless the behavior directly results in an injury. This sends a puzzling message to the organization and leaves workers wondering whether the discipline is in response to a rule being broken or to a person being injured.
- Myth 7: Comparing Ourselves To Industry Average Is Useful For Gauging Our Safety Performance. When safety professionals report safety measurables to Operations leadership, the first question Operations leaders tend to ask is “is that good or bad”. The safety professionals tend to respond by comparing these rates to industry average. This is akin to saying we do a good job because we don’t kill anyone more than anyone else. We can’t be satisfied with our safety record as long as anyone is getting hurt.
- Myth 8: Our goal is zero injuries. I have led the argument in favor of “zero injuries” as an organizational goal, but this is conundrum. Edward Deming denounced zero defects as detrimental to true quality. Many safety professionals will use Deming to support them as they shout down zero injury goals. While Deming believed that setting zero as a goal was destructive to the efforts, Deming never advocated accepting anything less than perfection as our philosophical vision. So while our vision is a zero, zero injuries are perhaps an unrealistic goal,
- Myth 9: Some companies don’t have a safety culture. Perhaps the biggest misconception safety professionals perpetuate is that their organization doesn’t have, and need to foster, a safety culture. All companies have a corporate culture of which, safety is an element, a corporate culture is nothing more than how the organization views various business elements, including safety. We need to enhance or improve our organization’s view of safety but claiming that we need to build a safety culture does more harm than good.
- Thank you for attending this presentation it was my pleasure being here and I hope you found a thing or two challenging and thought provocating