1. Findings and Focus for the Future
Texas STaR Chart

2. Purpose of the STaR chart
Strengths for Southridge
Areas of Improvement
Developmental needs
Conclusion
Agenda

3. School Technology and Readiness
Evaluates campus technology growth
Teacher surveyed
Four key areas
Four levels of progress
Matched with Texas long-range plan
What is STaR?

4. Southridge Results
Key Area Totals
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
Teaching &
Learning
Educator
Preparation
Administration
& Support
Infrastructure
Key Areas
Early: 6-8
Developing: 9-14
Advanced: 15-20
Target: 21-24

5.  Infrastructure has improved over the years
 Online learning is more prevalent
 CIP in alignment with technology needs
 Strong campus and district technical support
 Campus personnel demonstrate knowledge of standards
Strengths of Southridge

6. (Determined from data collected the past three years)
 Limited equipment for student use
 Matching technology TEKS with core curriculum
 Lack of planning for technology use in instruction
 Lack of students mastering skills in each grade level
 Student interaction through web-based programs
Areas for Improvement

7.  Professional development opportunities
 Model technology use in instruction
 Suggestions for use in all core subjects
 Digital citizenship tips for students and teachers
What’s Next for
Southridge?

8.  Questions
 Ideas for integrating technology into lessons:
How to Integrate Technology in the Classroom
Incorporating Web Media in the Classroom
Integrating Technology
Technology and Instruction
In Conclusion