The Iraq War was triggered by the 9/11 terrorist attacks and led by the United States in 2003 in an attempt to maintain international dominance and overthrow Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. The U.S. failed to properly plan for postwar Iraq, leading to insurgents and instability. Economic sanctions following the Gulf War had already weakened Iraq and left citizens unhappy with Hussein's regime.

1. The Iraq War Essay examples
Although severe consequences come with the decision of war with Iraq, most blinded United States
of America citizens are still yet persuaded to support such a war. The Bush Administration has
covered their schemes of war with lies to gain support. While weapons of mass destruction is
supposedly the reason why the United States launched military action to begin with, all the clearly
ignored consequences will haunt their final decision of war, and will remind them how the war is
not and never was justified. Whither the war is for the protection of the United States and their
alliances, or for oil production and the spread of democracy, the United States is only intensifying the
aggression of the situation. The Bush Administration's plan...show more content...
Bush, unaware of the extending consequences and the simple reason of war. Bush blinds the United
Sates of reality, while pointing his finger towards Iraq in blame. "Previously the United States has
always been sociable with brutal dictators such as Saddam Hussein, as long as it was a financial
advantage to America" (Zinn). Now that Saddam seems to be the only dictator afoot, the United
States ironically takes action (Zinn). However Saddam was blamed for Sept. 11th, despite of all
the evidence that clearly revealed that Saddam had nothing to do with the terrorists attack of that
day. Nevertheless, if Saddam would have been connected to the assault of 9/11, still yet, the United
States has no justification for war with Iraq, for the fault of one dictator. Hopefully the Bush
Administration would not consider using the fear of the remembered day of 2001 to gain the
necessary support of war (Walton). On the other hand, the Bush Administration claims the whole aim
of the operation in Iraq was not to only disarm Iraq, but to stop the dangerous spread of weapons of
mass destruction through the military force (Schell). Although the support of many U.S.A. citizens
is weak, President Bush insists "We muchs prevent the terrorists and regimes who seek chemical,
biological, or nuclear weapons from threatening the United States and the world (Schell). President
Bush also mentions how we will "not permit" (Schell) Iraq to
possess such weapons. However, for the United States to
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Essay on The Iraq War
What triggered the Iraq War that we are currently still having? During this time in history we were
still in the cold war as well Cold War (1945–1991), a lot of events has happened during this time
period. I am going to start with the Iran–Iraq war which started in 1980 and ended in 1988. The war
began when Iraq invaded Iran, launching a simultaneous invasion by air and land into Iranian
territory on 22 September 1980 following a long history of border disputes, and fears of Shia
insurgency among Iraq's long–suppressed Shia majority influenced by the Iranian Revolution.
(Wikipedia, Iran–Iraq War, 2011). This war had at least a million and half casualties and it severely
damaged both their economies, the Iran–Iraq war conflict is often...show more content...
Thus, the US government had the time to cultivate a plan to remove him from power that was
agreeable to all involved. One must examine the fine points of each argument that the administration
had proposed for the immediacy of war in order to best refute them. The first and often most
repeated argument that Saddam Hussein posed a direct threat to the United States is that he
possessed weapons of mass destruction. I am willing to concede that the Iraqi military possessed
both chemical and biological agents. Saddam Hussein had stockpiles of them that were never
accounted for after the first Gulf War. He has even used them on several occasions on Kurdish
minorities in Northern Iraq. However, no proof was ever offered that he possessed nuclear weapons
or the means to develop them in the near future.
Chemical and biological agents can certainly inflict devastating damage on a country's population.
However, what is the likelihood the Saddam Hussein would have used them on the United States or
even our allies in the region? Recent history demonstrates that it was not very likely. Up until the
first Gulf War, Iraq was an ally, in some sense of the word, of the United States. The US government
supported Saddam Hussein in his battle with Iran because we opposed the Shi'a fundamentalists in
Tehran. We gave Hussein, through American contractors, many of the chemical agents we
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. The Iraq War Essay
The 9/11 terroist attacks prompted the Iraq War, an invassion led by the United States in 2003 in
attempts to maintain international hegemony. The 9/11 attacks was viewed as a way to justly
invade Iraq and overthrow Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein who threatned one of the U.S' vital
economic component, oil. The main goal of the invasion in Iraq was to outs the radical leader
Saddam Hussein and institutionalize democracy, law and order in the country. The U.S failed to
plan properly for the aftermath of the regime change. This led to the outbreak of insurgents in Iraq
and an attempt for the United States to promote stability in the nation by their counter–insurgency
efforts. The Iraq War sparked by the 9/11 attacks led to the outbreak of Iraqi...show more content...
Prior to the Iraqi invasion, the country under the radical leader Saddam Hussein, despite the Kuwait
Invasion by Iraq led to the downfal of the Iraqi economy. The Gulf War of 1991 was damaging for
both Kuwait and Iraq, however Hussein remained in power despite his harsh treatment of the Kurds.
During the Gulf War, the state of Iraq suffered economic sanctions from the United States which
devasted the nation and left many people unhappy with the regime. Furthermore, the sanctions
imposed on Iraq also negatively impacted its people as there was an increase in malnuitrition. "
Therefore, the imposition of sanctions post–1990 had a particularly severe effect on Iraq's economy
and food security levels of the population. The State of the World's Children Report, 1997
(UNICEF) states that the per capita income in Iraq dropped from $3510 in 1989 to $450 in 1996.
The average salary dropped to 3 to 6 US dollars per month by 1999, largely due to a rapid
depreciation of the Iraqi dinar" (Sen, B, 2003). The country was to experience more instability after
the U.S invasion in 2003. The invasion conducted by the United States, led the state into a state of
instability. As the regime change made Iraqis unhappy, they destroyed infrastruture and began
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Iran-Iraq War Essay
Iran–Iraq War
The eight year Iran–Iraq War was, by the standards of international conflicts, a very long one. It
lasted longer than both World War I and World War II. In this conflict, the two most powerful states
in the Persian Gulf, Iran and Iraq, who were the world's largest producers of petroleum, were locked
in mortal combat and appeared intent on destroying each other. The war began when Iraq invaded
Iran, simultaneously launching an invasion by air and land into Iranian territory on September
1980 and ended with a United Nations brokered ceasefire in 1988. The causes of the war are
deeply rooted in the ideology and ambitions of the leaders of the countries to gain and maintain
control over internal and regional politics, as well...show more content...
Moreover, what had formerly been the Imperial Iranian military was greatly despoiled, with much
of the officer corps fleeing the Islamic Revolution. Also radical Marxists were still battling the
religious fundamentalists in part of the country. Because of all of the above factors, Iraq had a
uniquely promising chance to strike a devastating blow at its eastern neighbor, establishing Saddam
as the pre–eminent leader in the Persian Gulf region and perhaps so discrediting the new Iranian
government as to bring about its ultimate downfall.Saddam also wanted to put an end to religious
propaganda directed against Iraq's secular regime by the Islamic government of Iran, which had
come to power in 1979 under Khomeini. Khomeini, and during the Iranian Revolution, and most
Iranian Muslims belonged to the Shiite sect of Islam. Hussein feared that the propaganda would
undermine the loyalty of Iraqi Shiites, who comprised about 60 percent of his country's population.
On March 1980, Saddam received a pretext to engage in war when an assassination attempt was
made on Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz, by Iranian–backed rebel group Al Dawaa, followed by
the bombing on the funeral procession. Saddam blamed the Iranians and attacked in September.
Before declaring war Saddam, in a statement addressed to the Iraqi parliament, on 17 September,
stated that "The
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Iraq War Strategy
For Iraq, also failing to begin that endeavor with a clear endstate and what the international
community or the United States should do with Iraq after we broke it has proven costly not just to
Iraqis and Americans, but now to the stability of the entire region. Unilateral action is always risky
and, in this instance, despite our partners in the conflict, it has proven unwise not only for the
outcome but for the damage to our strategic influence. Just as Truman and Marshall were concerned
about a power vacuum post–WWII enabling Communism to consume Europe, we should have been
mindful of the same in 2003. Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam are all reminders that failing to learn
from the past, to not consider all the elements of strategy, to not clearly define our endstate and to
not commit fully to them remain...show more content...
As the case studies of the Civil War, WWII, Containment, and the Gulf War demonstrate strategies
conceived with clear objectives, with political and popular will, multi–laterally, with the intangible
elements of strategy in mind and proper whole of government resourcing, outcomes are successful.
In contrast, those strategies undertaken without the elements above and devoid of understanding the
culture, geographic, and ideological factors may win tactically but will probably fail strategically.
Howard sums best with, "it was the inadequacy of the sociopolitical analysis of the societies with
which we were dealing that lay at the root of the failure of the Western powers to cope more
effectively with the revolutionary and insurgency movements that characterized the postwar era,
from China in the 1940s to Vietnam in the 1960s" and I submit this same weakness cripples the US
strategy in Iraq and Afghanistan
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. War Crimes In Iraq
The United States committed war crimes in the war against Iraq because of the intrusion of people's
rights. Crimes against humanity consist of murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and
other inhuman acts committed against civilization before or during war. War crimes are actions
carried out during the conduct of a war that violates accepted international rules of war. Crimes
against humanity have existed and customary international law for over half a century and are also
evidenced in prosecution before some national courts (Bassiouni 1).
After War World II in 1945 theUnited States, allied developed the agreement for the persecution and
punishment of the european axis (germany, italy, japan). In 1948 genocide convention crimes...show
more content...
troops crossed the border into Kuwait, ending America's war in Iraq. More than 100 vehicles were
in that convoy, snaking its way across the desert and through the floodlit border crossing, leaving
behind empty bases and memories of nearly 4,500 American lives that were lost. Americans
breathed a sigh of relief. Many Iraqis held their breath. War, they feared, was far from over for them,
and time has borne out their fears. The death and violence never stopped –– it's just that the bombs
and bullets faded from American minds and television screens once the pull–out was complete. Two
years later we're back in Iraq and things are in many ways worse for Iraqis than when the Americans
left. Driving in along what the U.S. military called "Route Irish" –– or the BIAP (Baghdad
International Airport road) –– the stark concrete blast walls are now covered in murals, the median
is grassed with palm trees and fountains. We were reminded this was done for the 2012 Arab
League Summit in Baghdad, not for general "beautification." More than 8,000 people were killed in
Iraq in 2013, according to the U.N. estimates –– most of them innocent civilians caught up in the
tempest of violence that grips their country. A previous version of ISIS, the Islamic State of Iraq,
comprised the core insurgents the Americans fought in those cities during the war. They have
regrouped and strengthened across the border in Syria during that country's bloody conflict –– and
extended their fight for a home for their brand of hard–line Islamism into Iraq. The results have been
deadly –– not just in Ramadi and Fallujah of course, but across the country, where, just like the "bad
old days" of 2005–2009, bombings and killings have become pretty much daily events. The
Americans aren't coming back to help out with boots on the ground, but they are giving other
support –– offering drones, missiles, aircraft and other assistance. But this isn't a battle to be won
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

7. Iraq War Essay examples
The war waged on Iraq by the United States has been the cause of heated debate all over the world.
Many people have opposed the United States attack on Iraq for many viable reasons. Some of these
reasons include that it is not in the best interests for the reputation of the United States with the other
nations of the global community, it poses an increased threat to United States homeland security, and
it will result in many unjust crimes committed by the United States.
Going to war with Iraq will negatively affect the reputation of the United States with other countries
opposing the war. These countries include Germany, France, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, and
Pakistan, to name...show more content...
Angry nations are more apt to spawn groups of people who feel unsafe, violated, and angry at the
actions of the United States. Such people are more likely to commit terrorist acts in desperation for
the injustice they are witnessing. We have already seen the effects of September 11th, 2001, as the
World Trade Center was attacked. Waging this war will only fuel the fire already aimed at the
United States from previous generations, and may encourage more attacks like September 11th.
The final and most important reason for the United States not to wage war against Iraq is that it
will cause many war crimes. Wars always involve taking the lives of innocent people, and many
other injustices that can be illustrated if we look to wars fought in the past. First of all, innocent
civilians will be killed. The loss of every innocent life is an injustice and a tragedy. Secondly, after
the Persian Gulf War fought from 1990–1991, the troops who fought in the war and the people of
Iraq developed increased incidences of cancer and birth defects to their newborn children. This was
later found to be due to the radioactivity of the depleted uranium used in the weaponry to fight the
war. The current war against Iraq employs the same weaponry made of the depleted uranium, and
will only cause more generations of people with cancer and birth
Get more content on HelpWriting.net