SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  18
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Integrated Reporting Requires
Integrated Assurance
by Robert G. Eccles,a Michael P. Krzus,b
and Liv A. Watsonc
a
  Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
b
  Mike Krzus Consulting, Chicago, Illinois, USA
c
  XBRL International, Clark, New Jersey, USA



    This Chapter Covers

    8	 brief background on integrated reporting and the important role the
      A
      	
      accounting profession has played in developing it.
    8	 he meaning of “materiality” for both financial and nonfinancial information.
      T
      	
    8	 he key challenges faced in providing an integrated assurance opinion.
      T
      	
    8	 ecommendations for overcoming these challenges in order to make integrated
      R
      	
      assurance opinions a reality.



Introduction
Interest in integrated reporting is growing around the world. It is now required in
South Africa by the approximately 450 companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock
Exchange on a “comply or explain why not” basis.1 Although other countries may
follow South Africa’s lead and mandate integrated reporting over the next several
years, today it is an otherwise entirely voluntary activity by companies. Nevertheless, a
growing number of companies are adopting it because of the substantial benefits they
receive, including a better understanding of the relationship between financial and
nonfinancial performance, improved internal measurement and control systems for
producing reliable and timely nonfinancial information, lower reputational risk, greater
employee engagement, more committed customers who care about sustainability,
more long-term investors who value sustainable strategies, and improved relationships
with other stakeholders.2 There are approximately 240 companies using the Global
Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) G3 Guidelines that identified themselves as producing
an integrated report during 2010.3 Although many of these are European companies,
notable companies producing an integrated report in the United States include
American Electric Power, Pfizer, PepsiCo, Southwest Airlines, and United Technologies
Corporation.

In nearly all cases, the companies that produced an integrated report first started out
by producing a corporate social responsibility or sustainability report.4 The number of
such reports has grown dramatically over the last 10 years. For example, data from
CorporateRegister.com showed 3,287 companies publishing a sustainability report in
2010, compared to 830 companies in 2001.5 Similarly, the number of GRI reporters
had grown from 125 in 2001 to 1,864 in 2010.6




                                                                                            1
Effective Auditing for Corporates

    Though the growth in sustainability reporting is impressive, the growth in the extent
    to which these reports have any form of assurance on them, whether by a Big Four
    accounting firm or a specialist boutique, is less impressive.

    As shown in Table 1, in 2010 Spain had the largest percentage of companies obtaining
    an assurance opinion on their report, at 44%, and the United States had the lowest, at
    6%. Providing an assurance opinion on nonfinancial information is a necessary, albeit
    incomplete, step toward providing an integrated assurance opinion.

    Table 1. Sustainability reports with an external assurance statement 2001–107

                                      2001                                         2010

                   Sustainability Sustainability   Proportion   Sustainability Sustainability   Proportion
                      reports        reports       of reports      reports        reports       of reports
                       issued          with           with          issued          with           with
                                   assurance       assurance                    assurance       assurance
                                                       (%)                                          (%)

    Australia          117             31             26            248              52            21
    Canada              61              4              7            213              26            12
    Denmark             26             16             62             74              20            25
    Finland             27              6             22             71              19            27
    France              29              3             10            223              32            14
    Italy               58             30             52            566              66            12
    Japan              164             25             15            558              56            10
    Netherlands         46             14             30            159              39            25
    Norway              35              8             23             52              12            23
    South Africa         9              4             44            119              29            24
    Spain               12              3             25            256             113            44
    Sweden              37              6             16            163              49            30
    United             169             62             37            566             107            19
    Kingdom
     United            156             10              6            629              37             6
     States


    We believe that the full value of integrated reporting will only be realized when
    integrated assurance is provided on the report. After all, how much would investors
    rely on financial reports if they weren’t accompanied by an audit? It is the audit that,
    despite the occasional shortcoming, makes financial reports reliable and comparable.
    Reliability comes from the fact that the user knows that an objective third party has
    carefully reviewed the reported figures to ensure that the report has been prepared
    according to the relevant accounting standards—typically, International Financial
    Reporting Standards (IFRS) or US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP).

2
Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance

Comparability of information across companies, at least within a country and a sector,
comes from the fact that they have used the same accounting standards and that the
auditor has used audit procedures that are subject to oversight and review to ensure
their efficacy in ensuring the reliability of the reported information.

To make integrated reports as reliable and comparable as financial reports, an
integrated assurance opinion will have to be provided. Ideally, it will be in the form of
“positive assurance” (“the company did it right”) rather than the “negative assurance”
(“nothing leaped out at us as terribly wrong”) that is typically provided today. What we
are calling for are “integrated audits” that have the same degree of rigor, including the
review of internal systems and controls, as today’s financial audits. And while we prefer
the term “integrated audit” to “integrated assurance” to reinforce this connotation, we
will use the latter because the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
in the United States has already established its own, and much more limited, definition
of an “integrated audit.”8 The US Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 established the PCAOB
as the US standard-setter for audits of public companies and reserved the term “audit”
for an examination of financial statements.9 Similarly, the International Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) limits use of the term “audit” to an examination
of the financial statements.10 The IAASB is the audit and assurance standard-setting
organization of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).11

In this chapter we will provide some brief background on integrated reporting and the
important role which the accounting profession has already played in developing it, discuss
the meaning of “materiality” for both financial and nonfinancial information, identify the
key challenges in providing an integrated assurance opinion, and make recommendations
for overcoming these challenges in order to make integrated assurance opinions a reality.

Background on Integrated Reporting
On August 2, 2010, the Prince of Wales’ Accounting for Sustainability (A4S)
project and the GRI announced the formation of the International Integrated
Reporting Committee (IIRC).12 The mission of the IIRC is “To create a globally
accepted integrated reporting framework which brings together financial, environmental,
social and governance information in a clear, concise, consistent and comparable format”13
in order to “help business to take more sustainable decisions and enable investors and
other stakeholders to understand how an organization is really performing.”14

The accounting profession, through participation in the IIRC and in other ways,
has already made a substantial contribution to the integrated reporting movement.
Representatives from seven accounting associations (ACCA, CICPA, CIMA, FASB,
IASB, ICAEW, and IFAC) and six accounting firms (BDO Seidman, Deloitte Touche
Tomahtsu, Ernst & Young, Grant Thornton, KPMG, and PricewaterhouseCoopers) sit
on the steering committee of the IIRC.15 These firms have also contributed valuable
resources in the form of secondments. Deloitte,16 Ernst & Young,17 KPMG,18 and
PricewaterhouseCoopers19 have all written white papers on integrated reporting.
On July 27, 2011, the ACCA sponsored a live broadcast “Integrated reporting: A
framework for the future” as part of their annual Research and Insights Conference.20
It is our hope that these firms and associations will soon start contributing ideas and
resources to the topic of integrated assurance.


                                                                                              3
Effective Auditing for Corporates

    Integrated reporting involves reporting both financial and nonfinancial (environmental,
    social, and governance (ESG)) information in a single document, ideally showing
    the relationship between the two in terms of how strong performance on ESG issues
    contributes to strong financial performance and vice versa. A recent study by Eccles,
    Ioannou, and Serafeim (2011) shows that a set of 90 “high sustainability” firms
    significantly outperform a matched set of 90 “low sustainability” firms, providing
    evidence that attention to ESG issues contributes to financial performance.21 Today
    all listed companies are required to report on their financial performance on at least
    an annual basis, but reporting on nonfinancial performance is a voluntary exercise in
    most countries. We believe that integrated reporting of both financial and nonfinancial
    performance should ultimately be mandated. Ioannou and Serafeim (2011) have
    shown the benefits to companies and society of mandated ESG reporting.22 The same,
    and even more so, will be true of integrated reporting.


    What is Integrated Reporting?
         In simple terms, integrated reporting combines a company’s key financial and
         nonfinancial information into a single document. However, the integration
         of financial and nonfinancial reporting is about much more than publishing a
         single paper document. An integrated report serves as a means of reporting
         financial and nonfinancial information in a way that explains their impact on
         each other, answering a fundamental question: Just how does nonfinancial
         performance contribute to financial performance, and vice versa?

         The International Integrated Reporting Committee’s discussion paper23
         adds, “Integrated Reporting brings together material information about an
         organization’s strategy, governance, performance and prospects in a way that
         reflects the commercial, social and environmental context within which it
         operates. It provides a clear and concise representation of how an organization
         demonstrates stewardship and how it creates and sustains value.”

         Integrated reporting has the potential to significantly change how both
         companies and investors make capital allocation decisions, shifting the focus
         from that of meeting short-term financial goals to developing a long-term
         business strategy that defines sustainability as the creation of economic value
         over the long-term.


    Integrated reporting involves more than a static document. It also entails providing
    performance information in a more integrated way on the company’s website, along
    with providing more detailed information of particular interest to shareholders and
    other stakeholders. Analytical tools for exploring the relationship between financial
    and nonfinancial performance using data from the company and other sources, as well
    as comparing the company’s performance to its competitors, can also be provided.
    Finally, the company’s website can be used to improve its dialogue and engagement
    with all stakeholders. Integrated reporting is as much about listening as it is about
    talking.24

4
Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance

Long-term sustainable value creation requires the company to take a holistic view of
the consequences of its decisions regarding financial, natural, and human resources in
terms of how decisions about each type of resource affects the others. It also requires
good governance and risk management in order to ensure that decisions producing
short-term performance do not threaten the company’s long-term performance or,
in more extreme cases, even existence. As expressed by the IIRC, through integrated
reporting a company is able “to demonstrate the linkages between an organization’s
strategy, governance and financial performance and the social, environmental and
economic context within which it operates. The IIRC’s Framework will support an
organization in addressing, in a clear and concise manner, the material issues affecting
its ability to create and sustain value in the short, medium, and longer term.”25

Sustainable Strategies and Value Creation
     Companies operate in a multi-faceted world. The global economy is complex
     and intertwined, the demand for finite natural resources is accelerating, and
     the lingering effects of the 2008 financial crisis have left society skeptical and
     untrusting of corporations. Accordingly, a company’s strategy and business must
     reflect an inherent understanding of the relationships between the economic,
     governance, environmental, and social dimensions of performance.

     A sustainable strategy sets a company on a course towards value creation over
     the long term.

     Sustainable strategies include, but are not limited to (Eccles and Krzus, 2010):

     1. Long-term view. Sustainable strategies require a long-term view by
        the company and, by implication, its shareholders, who are one class of
        stakeholder.
     2. Multiple-stakeholder perspective. Sustainable strategies require the
        recognition of the legitimacy of the interests of other stakeholders, who must
        also take a long-term view.
     3. Engagement processes. Sustainable strategies depend upon processes of
        engagement for understanding the expectations of all stakeholders.
     4. Value creation for all stakeholders. Doing so contributes to value creation
        for shareholders as well as to meeting the needs of other stakeholders.

     Failure to adopt a sustainable strategy will put a company’s reputation and
     its ability to create shareholder value at risk. Success in the 21st century will
     belong to organizations that have learned to balance the imperative for long-
     term viability of the company and the world it relies on to create economic
     value, with the demands for short-term competitiveness and profitability.

Integrated reporting is both the most effective way for a company with a sustainable
strategy to report on its performance and a form of discipline to ensure that it has a
sustainable strategy in the first place. Integrated assurance will enhance the credibility
of the integrated report to both management and investors, thereby increasing its utility
to both.


                                                                                             5
Effective Auditing for Corporates

    The seeds for an integrated assurance opinion are already being sown. For example,
    KPMG does both the financial audit and provides negative assurance on the nonfinancial
    information reported by Philips Electronics in its integrated report.26 PricewaterhouseCoopers
    does the same for the Novo Nordisk integrated report.27 But to get to a single integrated audit
    assurance opinion, the question of defining “materiality” for nonfinancial information needs
    to be addressed.


     Case Study

       The Challenges of Integrated Assurance at Philips Electronics
       Interest in nonfinancial (e.g., environmental, social, and governance) information is growing (see
       Eccles, Krzus, and Serafeim, 2011). From an investor perspective, a link between sustainability
       performance and a company’s ability to create economic value over the long term has been
       demonstrated (see Eccles, Ioannou, and Serafeim, 2011). Credibility is one of the keys to increased
       demand for, and more widespread acceptance of, nonfinancial information by shareholders and
       other stakeholders.
            An increasing number of companies have asked their auditor to provide an assurance report
       on their nonfinancial information. KPMG found that of the 250 largest companies publishing
       environmental, social, and governance reports, 46% of those reports include formal assurance.
       This is up from 29% in 2002.28
            One of the issues facing companies when they contemplate a request for positive rather
       than negative assurance on their nonfinancial information is data quality. Sustainability and other
       nonfinancial information are not typically produced by systems subject to robust controls and
       processes, as is financial information. As a result, assurance providers may not be able to apply their
       methodologies and procedures to nonfinancial information. This doesn’t mean that the data are
       inherently inaccurate. However, sustainability managers will be required to establish preventive
       and detective controls and complete internal control questionnaires for systems and processes.
            A complicating factor for both Philips and KPMG is the absence of generally accepted global
       standards for measuring and reporting nonfinancial information. Standards promote reporting
       that provides relevant and useful information to stakeholders. Standards are necessary so that
       nonfinancial information is meaningful, especially across sectors. Absent standards, comparative
       analysis is virtually impossible.
            The discussion about integrated assurance at Philips challenged KPMG to carefully weigh the
       benefits and risks of providing assurance on nonfinancial information. Certainly, KPMG was in a
       position to develop a new revenue stream. However, KPMG—like the other Big Four accounting
       firms—realize that their market position depends on the firm’s credibility and reputation.
       Anything that threatened the firm’s reputation would be thoroughly and cautiously reviewed.
            While some might argue that financial statement audit methodologies can be easily applied
       to nonfinancial information, neither KPMG nor other audit firms had fully developed approaches
       to provide positive assurance on nonfinancial information. The lack of nonfinancial accounting
       standards and related high quality assurance methodologies for nonfinancial information
       prevented KPMG from delivering an integrated assurance report.
            The process to deliver integrated financial and nonfinancial assurance required a significant
       investment of time and people at both Philips and KPMG. Ultimately, Philips shareholders and
       other stakeholders need to respond to the question of whether the increased quality and
       reliability provided by assurance on nonfinancial information will be judged as adding value.



6
Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance

Materiality
The IIRC, quoted above, refers to “the material issues” that affect the organization’s
“ability to create and sustain value in the short, medium, and longer term.” The
concept of materiality is critical to both financial statement disclosure and the
reporting of nonfinancial information. In addition, judgments about materiality
influence accounting firms’ audit and assurance processes. Ultimately, each user of
business information—management, shareholders, analysts, regulators, civil society,
and a variety of others—determines what is material.

The omission or misstatement of an item in a financial report is material if, in
consideration of relevant facts and circumstances, the magnitude of the item is such
that it is probable that the judgment of a reasonable person would be changed or
influenced by the inclusion or correction of the item. In other words, a matter is
material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable person would consider it
important. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the US Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) captured this point when both organizations
adopted the same definition of materiality. Materiality is “…an entity-specific aspect
of relevance based on the nature or magnitude (or both) of the items to which the
information relates in the context of an individual entity’s financial report.”29, 30

The concept of materiality in financial reporting has both quantitative (nature) and
qualitative (magnitude) aspects. Regulators and standard-setters often state that
materiality cannot be reduced to a numerical formula, yet numerical “rules of thumb,”
such as 5% of earnings before income taxes or 10% of a given account balance, are
often used as a basis for determining materiality. Since the determination of what is
material must reflect both the nature and the magnitude of an item, simply quantifying
the magnitude of an error or misstatement in percentage terms cannot be used as a
substitute for a full analysis of relevant considerations. Qualitative factors, such as:

     8 whether the misstatement masks a change in earnings or other trends,
     8 whether the misstatement hides a failure to meet analysts’ earnings
       expectations,
     8 whether the misstatement changes a loss into income or vice versa,
     8 or whether the misstatement affects the compliance with laws or regulations,

may cause quantitatively small amounts to be material. The Supreme Court of the
United States reinforced the importance of considering qualitative and quantitative
factors by ruling that a fact is material if there is “a substantial likelihood that the…
fact would have been viewed by the reasonable investor as having significantly altered
the ‘total mix’ of information made available.”31

Materiality guidance for auditors of financial statements is similar to guidance provided
to companies in preparing their financial statements. For example, the IAASB does not
prescribe any specific methodology for determining materiality, but states that “The
auditor’s determination of materiality is a matter of professional judgment, and is affected
by the auditor’s perception of the financial information needs of users of the financial
statements.”32 Similarly, the PCAOB does not prescribe any methodology for determining
materiality. Instead, the PCAOB standard refers to a US Supreme Court decision.33


                                                                                               7
Effective Auditing for Corporates

    There are no standards for the preparation of nonfinancial information equivalent
    to either IFRS or US GAAP, and there is therefore no materiality guidance for
    companies. Yet there is guidance on assurance and attestation methodologies, and
    the international and US versions are very similar. The IAASB and the PCAOB use
    the terms “assurance” and “attestation” in reference to engagements other than
    audits or reviews of historical financial information. PCAOB guidance on attestation
    states: “In expressing a conclusion, the practitioner should consider an omission or a
    misstatement to be material if the omission or misstatement—individually or when
    aggregated with others—is such that a reasonable person would be influenced by
    the omission or misstatement. The practitioner should consider both qualitative and
    quantitative aspects of omissions and misstatements.”34 Note that the term “reasonable
    person” anticipates users of the information other than investors.

    Similarly, the IAASB provides the following guidance to assurance providers:
    “Materiality is considered in the context of quantitative and qualitative factors, such
    as relative magnitude, the nature and extent of the effect of these factors on the
    evaluation or measurement of the subject matter, and the interests of the intended
    users. The assessment of materiality and the relative importance of quantitative
    and qualitative factors in a particular engagement are matters for the practitioner’s
    judgment.”35 Again, the term “users” is clearly a broader one than “investors,” raising
    the question of whether materiality lies in the eyes of the beholder.

    In summary, international and US guidance on materiality for financial and
    nonfinancial information is substantively the same and can be broken into two parts.
    First, materiality is a matter of professional judgment. Second, the determination of
    materiality is based on the company’s and the auditor’s perceptions of the information
    needs of users. Both of these elements pose challenges to companies and assurance
    providers. There is also the question of whether the absence of detailed rules or fear
    of litigation inhibits professionals from exercising judgment. Another issue is whether
    it is possible to know if a “reasonable person” would consider a given matter to be
    important enough to influence his or her decision-making.

    Given that authoritative guidelines for determining materiality for nonfinancial
    information are very general at best, companies are developing their own ways to put
    this concept into practice. According to the CorporateRegister.com database,36 almost
    3,300 sustainability reports were published in 2010, and approximately 800 of those
    reports included a discussion of materiality. Seventy-one of these 800 companies
    presented a materiality matrix to identify matters that were important to stakeholders
    and to the company. Like the reports themselves, there was a wide range in the quality
    of the disclosures within the materiality matrix. For example:

         8 Banco Bradesco used a materiality matrix in its 2009 report, but did not
           populate it.37
         8 BASF did not provide a materiality matrix in the paper version of the BASF
           Report 2009, but provided a link to an online matrix. Clicking on a topic takes
           the reader to a more detailed discussion of the issue. The company identified
           approximately 40 key issues (i.e., ranking higher than 0.5 on a scale of 0.0 to
           1.0).38

8
Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance

     8 L’Oréal mapped topics of concern to stakeholders and relevance to the
       company and, similar to BASF, clicking on a link in the online 2009
       sustainability report enabled a reader to download a factsheet summarizing
       L’Oréal’s approach to these challenges.39
     8 Petrobras disclosed over 40 issues in their 2009 sustainability report as highly
       relevant to stakeholders and the company.40
     8 SolarWorld noted in its 2009 annual report that materiality is determined
       by the economic, environmental, and social impact of the topics and
       indicators. However, the materiality matrix did not specifically identify
       any issues.41
     8 State Street Corporation disclosed a small number of critical issues in its 2009
       materiality matrix. Key topics and concerns included the company’s role as a
       fiduciary, marketplace issues in the current environment, business conduct,
       community impacts, and fraud and corruption.42

The materiality disclosures of the six companies identified above are representative
of the information provided by the 71 companies that provide a materiality matrix.
These companies are trying in their own ways to understand which issues should
influence their decisions and actions in order to deliver on dimensions of performance
that are important to the company, its shareholders, and other stakeholders. From
these examples, the following questions are raised that will need to be addressed in
providing integrated assurance opinions: (1) How are the dimensions of the matrices
defined? (2) What is the value of providing a materiality matrix without reporting on
what issues the company regards as material? (3) How does materiality differ across
groups, such as shareholders vs. stakeholders? (4) Can 40 or 50 nonfinancial factors
truly be material?

Challenges to Providing an Integrated Assurance Opinion
There are three major challenges to producing an integrated assurance opinion:

     8 developing a global set of credible standards for measuring and reporting
       nonfinancial information which have the appropriate governmental support,
       just as is true for accounting standards;
     8 developing methodologies for providing positive assurance on nonfinancial
       information;
     8 integrating standards and assurance methodologies for financial and
       nonfinancial information in a way that provides a “true and fair view of an
       organization’s sustainability.”


Credible Standards for Measuring and Reporting Nonfinancial Information
Standards for nonfinancial information provide the foundation for being able to
provide an integrated assurance opinion that is backed by the same degree of rigor
as a financial audit. This is also the most difficult challenge and one fraught with
contention, as is always the case when establishing standards. Two issues must be
addressed. The first is “Who should be responsible for doing this?” Today there are a
number of organizations that are doing good work in this domain, such as:



                                                                                          9
Effective Auditing for Corporates

         8 The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). As the secretariat to the Climate
           Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), the CDP has developed the Climate
           Change Reporting Framework.43 Modeled in some ways after how accounting
           standards are set and with significant input from the Big Four firms, the CDSB
           has established standards for measuring carbon emissions and could build on
           this work to set standards for other environmental issues, such as water.
         8 The European Federation of Financial Analyst Societies (EFFAS). EFFAS built
           on work done by the Society of Investment Professionals in Germany (DVFA)
           and published its own set of key performance indicators with an emphasis on
           information that is of particular interest to investors.44 These standards are
           both general and industry-specific, which is also true of the G3 Guidelines.
         8 The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The GRI is one of the oldest standard-
           setting organizations for nonfinancial information and its G3 Guidelines
           for economic, environmental, and social metrics are currently the most
           commonly used set of standards for reporting on ESG performance. The
           GRI is currently working on developing its G4 Guidelines to ensure that its
           efforts support the work of the IIRC.45 In August 2011, the GRI launched a G4
           Public Comment Period46 to solicit comments and ideas from organizational
           stakeholders and the public to help shape G4.
         8 The International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The ISO published
           ISO 14000,47 which focuses on environmental management systems, and ISO
           26000,48 and addresses matters of social responsibility.
         8 Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS). IRIS developed
           performance indicators and metrics for companies and investors. The
           indicators are organized in a framework that is designed to apply across
           sectors and geographies.49
         8 The Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD).
           The OECD published its most recent version of “Guidelines for reporting by
           multinational enterprises” in 2008.50
         8 The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
           UNCTAD’s Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International
           Standards of Accounting and Reporting (ISAR) released voluntary guidance
           in 2008 to assist enterprises in their efforts to communicate with investors
           and other stakeholders.51

     The GRI, the CDSB, the DVFA, and other groups attempting to set standards for
     nonfinancial information need to collaborate rather than compete with each other so
     that the history of “country-GAAP” does not repeat itself.

     Assuming that this cooperation emerges—an admittedly big assumption—the
     question then becomes “How will these standards become institutionally legitimized
     and enforced?” Accounting standards, such as those set by the FASB in the United
     States, are ultimately backed by governmental authority; for example, the Securities
     and Exchange Commission in the United States. Little to no such governmental
     support exists for the work done by the organizations cited above. Until it does,
     companies will not know which set of standards to use, comparability of performance
     measures across companies will be compromised, and the ultimate reliability of the
     reported information will be in doubt.

10
Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance

Methodologies for Providing Assurance on Nonfinancial Information
The second challenge is to develop audit methodologies—and we use the term “audit”
on purpose—for nonfinancial information that are as rigorous as they are for financial
information. Having a rigorous and institutionally legitimate set of standards for
nonfinancial information greatly facilitates the development of audit methodologies.
Procedures for evaluating the quality of the internal control and measurement
systems also need to be developed. Though a crude metric, we suggest that that the
hours (and costs) of auditing nonfinancial information should be roughly the same
level as for financial information. Today there are orders-of-magnitude differences
between the two—one of many factors that contribute to the greater attention paid
to financial information. One obvious concern is whether this will lead to a “windfall”
for external auditors’ fees. If the auditing profession is providing a valued service, it
should be paid for doing so. Our view is that shareholders will ultimately determine
the level of effort and cost applied to the audit of nonfinancial information, and thus
the fees paid to those who perform these audits, based on the value shareholders are
getting from having more reliable information. We also believe that technology can be
used to dramatically reduce the cost of integrated audits, although this will depend
on the development of standards for nonfinancial information which, in turn, requires
a clear concept of materiality for nonfinancial information, as discussed above.


Rigor of Financial Audits and What Goes into Them
     The standard auditor’s report, whether prepared under US or international
     auditing standards, includes a paragraph that describes the auditor’s
     responsibility. This paragraph describes, among other things, the auditing
     standards used and that the audit has been planned and performed to obtain
     reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
     misstatement. Also explained is that the auditor tested evidence supporting the
     amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and assessed the accounting
     principles used and significant estimates made by management. Finally, the
     auditor states that the audit provided a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     The Center for Audit Quality explains52 processes and practices for the
     performance of a financial statement audit. Audit procedures for financial
     statement audits that could be replicated to provide assurance on nonfinancial
     information include:

     1. Inspection. The examination of records or documents, whether internal or
        external, in paper form, electronic or other media, or physically examining
        an asset. For example, inspecting a sample of invoices.
     2. Observation. Observing a process or procedure being performed by
        company personnel or others. For example, observing a company’s physical
        inventory count, and re-performing counts on a test basis.
     3. Inquiry. Seeking information from knowledgeable persons in financial or
        nonfinancial roles within the company or outside the company.
     4. Confirmation. Obtaining information or representation of an existing
        condition directly from a knowledgeable third party.


                                                                                            11
Effective Auditing for Corporates

          5. Recalculation. Checking the mathematical accuracy of documents or
             records.
          6. Analytical procedures. Comparison of recorded amounts, or ratios
             developed from recorded amounts, to expectations developed by the
             independent auditor.
          7. Re-performance. The auditor’s independent execution of procedures or
             controls that originally were performed as part of the company’s internal
             control over financial reporting.

     Integrating Standards and Assurance Methodologies for Financial and
     Nonfinancial Information
     The third challenge is to integrate accounting and auditing standards for financial and
     nonfinancial information in order to provide a “true and fair view of an organization’s
     sustainability.” Today, the “true and fair”53 view of a company’s financial statements—a
     concept that is more common outside of the United States, where the term “presents
     fairly”54 is used—asserts that the overall picture provided in the financial statements
     is more than simply a collection of “the right numbers” taken one at a time. There is a
     rebuttable presumption in both the “true and fair” view and “presents fairly” that the
     company is an ongoing concern for one year, unless stated otherwise. This perspective
     is a relatively short-term one which is focused solely on shareholders. Since integrated
     reporting is intended to give shareholders and other stakeholders information about
     the company’s ability to create value over the long term, an integrated assurance
     opinion needs to be a “true and fair” view of the company’s long-term sustainability,
     explicitly taking into account the extent to which the company is meeting the needs of
     other stakeholders in order to be able to continue creating value for its shareholders.

     Who Should Provide Integrated Assurance Opinions?
     Once these challenges are overcome, the question then becomes which organizations
     should issue integrated assurance opinions. We believe that accounting firms,
     especially the Big Four and others like BDO Seidman and Grant Thornton, which
     audit public companies, have a central role to play. They have the necessary global
     networks, established relationships with all public companies, and the skills and a
     long tradition of conducting rigorous audits. As a practical matter, at least in the
     short term, we do not see any other types of organization as interested in and able
     to perform this role. This could change over time as technology advances and other
     firms, such as software and IT services firms, develop the capabilities to perform
     continuous audits, albeit in a rather different way that will require major adaptations
     by auditing standard-setting bodies.

     But for the world’s major auditing firms to conduct integrated audits, two other
     challenges need to be faced. The first is building the necessary capabilities, and the
     second is liability reform. The accounting firms need to take responsibility for the
     former, but the latter is a question of public policy and the firms cannot resolve it
     on their own. Once an assurance opinion goes beyond financial information based
     on accounting standards to include information on environmental, social, and
     governance performance, a much broader range of capabilities becomes necessary.
     None of the major accounting firms have even close to the necessary capabilities,
     although some are working to develop them.

12
Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance


Practice Protection Costs
     According to the October 2008 final report of the Advisory Committee on the
     Auditing Profession to the US Department of the Treasury,55 the six international
     auditing firms paid approximately US$5.7 billion to bring 362 cases to closure
     during the period 1997–2009. Of that amount, about US$3.7 billion, or 65%,
     was related to the audits of public (listed) companies. Litigation and practice
     protection costs include all litigation-related costs—costs of outside counsel and
     other experts, settlements and judgments, internal litigation-related costs, and
     insurance premiums, less insurance recoveries. The amount is equal to 6.6% of
     these firms’ revenues and 15.1% of these firms’ audit- related revenues.

     Litigation is clearly of significant concern to the auditing firms but is also of
     concern to investors and other market stakeholders. The challenge, certainly
     from the perspective of the auditing firms, is that they are an easy target for
     litigation. Audit firms are often sued when a company suffers a sudden and
     dramatic drop in its stock price or when a company goes bankrupt. Other
     stakeholders question whether efforts to limit liability are in the interest of
     investors and the capital markets, believing that the firms can best protect
     themselves by performing high quality and informative audits in full compliance
     with US or international professional standards. Ultimately, the legal system
     must balance the needs of auditing firms and the public interest.

The extent to which accounting firms have the incentives and resources to build these
capabilities partially depends on their expected and actual liabilities in conducting
integrated audits. Liability reform remains a hot topic in the auditing profession,
especially in the litigious United States. The debate today centers on the audits of
financial statements, especially when accounting problems are confounded with
a company’s bankruptcy, or when major fraud, especially in top management, is
detected. This debate needs to be extended to the liabilities that will emerge from
giving as much prominence to nonfinancial information as to financial information.
Legislators and regulators will have to address this topic in a reasoned and responsible
way. Ultimately, laws and regulations must balance the need to punish incompetence
and malfeasance while creating an environment that encourages the accounting firms
to make the investments necessary to provide high-quality assurance on nonfinancial
information.



 Summary and Further Steps


  We will conclude with five recommendations which address the above five challenges.
  Each of these recommendations requires the active engagement of the accounting
  profession, including those in auditing firms, corporations (such as those in the finance
  function and internal audit), and academia. Failure of the accounting profession to help
  address these challenges puts its long-term relevance at risk. More importantly, it also puts
  at risk the development of a sustainable society.


                                                                                                  13
Effective Auditing for Corporates

          8 First, working with the agencies of the government that give authority to their
            efforts, accounting standard-setters, such as the FASB and the IASB, should initiate
            projects to determine how to develop an institutionally legitimate set of standards
            for nonfinancial information. These bodies have deep expertise in the standard-
            setting process, although their domain knowledge is exclusively in the financial
            realm. Working with organizations that have expertise in the nonfinancial realm,
            they can develop a set of standards for nonfinancial information that have the same
            credibility as do standards for financial information. We also suggest that greater
            use could be made of technology to speed the development process. Setting
            accounting standards is a notoriously slow process, taking years or even decades,
            and a greater sense of urgency is necessary if a sustainable society is to be created.
          8 Second, auditing standard-setters, such as the PCAOB in the United States and the
            IFAC, through the IAASB, should initiate projects for developing auditing standards
            for nonfinancial information, with respect both to individual metrics and to the
            internal control and measurement systems that produce them. As with accounting
            standard-setters, they should leverage their expertise in standard-setting and
            extend it by collaborating with organizations that have relevant expertise in the
            nonfinancial domain, such as organizations that audit supply chains and adherence
            to principles of human rights.
          8 Third, both accounting and auditing standard-setting bodies should collaborate on
            initiating a project to define the meaning of “a true and fair view of an organization’s
            sustainability.” This definition will inform how measurement and auditing standards
            for financial and nonfinancial information are forged, rather than spliced, together
            in order to produce a truly integrated assurance opinion—a true “integrated
            audit” that takes into account the relationship between financial and nonfinancial
            performance. This project will require substantial input from organizations that
            have the relevant expertise in standard-setting and the assurance of nonfinancial
            information.
          8 Fourth, the major accounting firms should build the necessary capabilities to
            conduct an integrated audit. This will be done through a combination of hiring
            individuals with technical skills outside of accounting (such as in engineering
            and supply-chain management), acquisitions of firms that have such skills, and
            building alliances and partnerships with such firms. The first two approaches
            raise an important practical question which the accounting profession and the
            entities that regulate it should address: What are the roles and responsibilities of
            the nonaccountant professionals within the audit and assurance hierarchies of
            the firms? Failure to address this question will leave them forever as “second class
            citizens,” to the detriment of placing nonfinancial information on an equal footing
            with financial information. The third approach, in which the accounting firm
            would be functioning as a “general contractor,” raises issues of liability exposure
            and risk-sharing. As experience in the construction industry shows, this is a
            difficult question to resolve and no clean and simple solution exists. International
            Standards on Auditing56 (ISA) and US Generally Accepted Auditing Standards57
            (GAAS) provide similar guidance to auditors who use the work of an expert or
            specialist in performing an audit. Both standards apply to the work of, for example,
            actuaries, appraisers, attorneys, engineers, environmental consultants, and
            geologists. Under international and US standards, the auditor is not permitted to
            refer to the work or findings of the specialist to avoid the risk that such a reference

14
Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance

       might be misunderstood to be a qualification of the opinion or that any division of
       responsibility exists.
           Of course, it is conceptually possible to split the responsibilities for auditing
       the financial and nonfinancial information between two audit firms, or have a
       nonaccounting firm do the latter, or even have a nonaccounting firm issue the
       integrated audit with input from an accounting firm on the financial audit. At
       least in the short term, we don’t see any of these models as being practical due to
       regulations and the unlikelihood that investors would find a nonaccounting firm to
       be credible in issuing an integrated audit.
     8 Fifth, the politically contentious issue of limiting the liability of accounting firms
       should be addressed. Opponents of this idea cite the substantial incomes earned
       by partners in the major accounting firms, point out that audit failures and the
       inability to detect fraud are still too common, and legitimately worry about the
       moral hazard problem if the risk of failure is shifted away from the firms. They may
       also point out that the substantial new revenue opportunities made possible by
       integrated audits should be enough of an incentive for auditing firms to do them.
       However, given the current concentration in the auditing industry,58 especially
       with respect to the world’s largest companies, the public risk of losing another
       large accounting firm due to litigation is simply too great. In the long term, this
       concentration is a public policy question that should be addressed, but in the
       short term we need to ensure that sufficient capacity exists to provide integrated
       assurance opinions for all listed companies.




More Info

 Book:
 Eccles, Robert G., and Michael P. Krzus. One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable
     Strategy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010.
 Article:
 Eccles, Robert G., and Kyle Armbrester. “ Integrated reporting in the cloud: Two disruptive
     ideas combined.” IESE Insight 8 (First Quarter 2011): 13–20. Online at: tinyurl.com/7tkqojj
 Reports:
 Eccles, Robert G., Ioannis Ioannou, and George Serafeim. “The impact of a corporate
     culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance.” Working paper
     12-035. Harvard Business School, November 4, 2011. Online at:
     www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/12-035.pdf
 Ioannou, Ioannis, and George Serafeim. “The consequences of mandatory corporate
     sustainability reporting.” Working paper 11-100. Harvard Business School, 2011. Online
     at: www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/11-100.pdf




                                                                                                   15
Effective Auditing for Corporates

         Websites:
         Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP): www.cdproject.net
         Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB): www.cdsb.net
         CorporateRegister database: www.corporateregister.com
         European Federation of Financial Analyst Societies (EFFAS): www.effas.net
         Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): www.globalreporting.org
         Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS): iris.thegiin.org
         International Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC): www.theiirc.org


     Notes
     1. South African Institute of Chartered Accountants. “An integrated report is a new requirement for listed companies.” Press
         release. June 4, 2010. Online at: tinyurl.com/8845pl9
     2. For a more complete discussion of the benefits to companies of integrated reporting, see Eccles and Krzus (2010), and
         Eccles and Armbrester (2011).
     3. GRI reports list: tinyurl.com/7jmt2yw
     4. Terminology regarding the reporting of nonfinancial information is inconsistent and confusing. Some people use the
         terms “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) and “sustainability” interchangeably, whereas for others they mean different
         things. Each term also has different meanings. For some companies, their CSR report is about philanthropic contributions
         and community activities. For others, it is about their ESG performance more broadly. Similarly, for some companies their
         sustainability report is solely about carbon emissions and other environmental concerns, while for others it is about ESG
         performance more broadly. We will use the term “sustainability report” to refer to the entire range of ESG performance
         information. For a discussion of the origins of the concepts of corporate social responsibility and sustainability see chapter 5
         in Eccles and Krzus (2010).
     5. CorporateRegister.com (see www.corporateregister.com/about.html). The database is available on a subscription-only basis.
     6. GRI, op. cit. 3.
     7. CorporateRegister.com, op. cit. 5.
     8. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. “Auditing standard no. 5: An audit of internal control over financial reporting
         that is integrated with an audit of financial statements.” Online at: tinyurl.com/ye5sprj; para. 6–7.
     9. The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, Section 2, Definitions (2), defines an “audit” as “an examination of the financial
         statements of any issuer [a publicly traded or listed company] by an independent public accounting firm in accordance with
         the rules of the Board [Public Company Accounting Oversight Board] or the Commission [the US Securities and Exchange
         Commission]…”
     10. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. “International standard on auditing 200: Overall objectives of the
         independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing.” Online at:
         tinyurl.com/6oyvbat [PDF].
     11. The International Federation of Accountants develops international standards on ethics, auditing and assurance, education,
         and public sector accounting standards through its independent standard-setting boards, which include the International
         Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. See web.ifac.org/download/Facts_About_IFAC.pdf
     12. See tinyurl.com/75eoxuw
     13. See www.theiirc.org/the-iirc
     14. See www.theiirc.org/about
     15. See www.theiirc.org/the-iirc
     16. Deloitte. “Integrated reporting: Is your message lost in regulation?” 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/7vdphmt [PDF].
     17. Ernst & Young. “Integrated report: Content outline.” 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/6wdssod [PDF].
     18. KPMG. “Integrated reporting: Closing the loop of strategy.” 2010. Online at: tinyurl.com/6m8swmq [PDF].
     19. PricewaterhouseCoopers. “Insight or fatigue? FTSE 350 reporting.” 2010. Online at: www.pwcwebcast.co.uk/cr_ftse350.pdf
     20. The ACCA event can be accessed at tinyurl.com/6we2ndm
     21. Eccles, Ioannou, and Serafeim (2011).
     22. Ioannou and Serafeim (2011).
     23. International Integrated Reporting Committee. “Towards integrated reporting: Communicating value in the 21st century.”
         September 12, 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/6k4y8w4; p. 3.
     24. For discussions of the role of the Internet in integrated reporting, see chapter 7, “The Internet and integrated reporting,” in
         Eccles and Krzus (2010), and Eccles and Armbrester (2011).


16
Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance

25. See tinyurl.com/88w5tvv [PDF].
26. Philips Annual Report 2010: www.annualreport2010.philips.com/downloads/. See Section 14.5, page 206, for the
    KPMG independent auditor’s report on the 2010 Philips financial statements, and Section 15.7, page 221, for the KPMG
    independent assurance report on the 2010 Philips sustainability statements.
27. Novo Nordisk Annual Report 2010: tinyurl.com/87vmptm. See page 110 for the PricewaterhouseCoopers independent
    auditor’s report on the 2010 Novo Nordisk financial statements and page 111 for the PricewaterhouseCoopers independent
    assurance report on the 2010 Novo Nordisk nonfinancial information.
28. KPMG. “KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011.” November 2011. Online at:
    tinyurl.com/7z46ne8 [PDF].
29. Deloitte IAS Plus. “Summaries of international financial reporting standards … Conceptual framework for financial
    reporting 2010.” September 2010. Online at: www.iasplus.com/standard/framewk.htm. Note: International Financial
    Reporting Standards are only available through a subscription service.
30. Financial Accounting Standards Board. “Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 8: Conceptual framework for
    financial reporting.” September 2010. Online at: tinyurl.com/86c5dr9; para. QC11.
31. TSC Industries v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 449 (1976). See also Basic, Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988).
32. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. “International standard on auditing 320: Materiality in planning and
    performing an audit.” Online at: tinyurl.com/7mekuor [PDF]; para. 4.
33. TSC v. Northway, op. cit. 29.
34. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. “AT section 101: Attest engagements.” Online at:
    pcaobus.org/Standards/Attestation/Pages/AT101.aspx; para. 67.
35. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. “International standard on assurance engagements 3000: Assurance
    engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information.” Online at: tinyurl.com/7h2fez7 [PDF]; para. 23.
36. CorporateRegister.com, op. cit. 5.
37. Banco Bradesco. “2009 sustainability report.” Online at: tinyurl.com/75yj2ug [PDF]; p. 65. Bradesco is one of Brazil’s largest
    private banks (not controlled by government) in terms of total assets.
38. BASF is the world’s leading chemical company. BASF employed about 110,000 people and had approximately 385
    production sites worldwide. See tinyurl.com/7xd3s3q
39. L’Oréal is the world’s leading cosmetics group. Based in France, the company employed 66,600 people in 130 countries. See
    tinyurl.com/8ydjhtp
40. Petrobras was a publicly traded corporation and its the majority stockholder was the government of Brazil. It ranked as the
    third-largest energy company in the world with a presence in 28 countries. See tinyurl.com/7clh779
41. SolarWorld was one of the world’s largest solar energy businesses with more than 3,600 employees at production facilities
    in Germany and the United States. See tinyurl.com/7qlc8dp
42. State Street Corporation was founded in 1972. The company was a global leader in financial services and provided a wide
    range of products and services for large pools of investment assets. See tinyurl.com/75ga2tb [PDF]; p. 5.
43. Climate Disclosure Standards Board. “Climate change reporting framework.” Edition 1.0. September 2010.
44. Society of Investment Professionals in Germany. “KPIs for ESG: A guideline for the integration of ESG into financial analysis
    and corporate valuation.” Version 3.0. 2010. Online at: tinyurl.com/6z2msgz [PDF].
45. GRI G4 developments: tinyurl.com/bvf7rsp
46. GRI G4 first public comment period—survey: tinyurl.com/5t6gmyo
47. International Organization for Standardization. “ISO 14000 essentials.” Online at: www.iso.org/iso/iso_14000_essentials
48. International Organization for Standardization. “ISO 2600 social responsibility.” Online at:
    www.iso.org/iso/social_responsibility
49. Impact Reporting and Investment Standards. “IRIS standards.” Online at: iris.thegiin.org/iris-standards
50. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. “Guidelines for reporting by multinational enterprises.” 2008.
    Online at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/56/36/1922428.pdf
51. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. “Guidance on corporate responsibility indicators in annual reports.”
    2008. Online at: www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteteb20076_en.pdf
52. Center for Audit Quality. “In-depth guide to public company auditing: The financial statement audit.” May 2011. Online at:
    tinyurl.com/6lunkeu [PDF].
53. Financial Reporting Council. “True and fair.” July 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/75trdvx [PDF]. Also: Moore, Martin. “The
    true and fair requirement revisited: Opinion.” April 21, 2008. Online at: tinyurl.com/5qpfen [PDF].
54. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. “AU section 411: The meaning of present fairly in conformity with generally
    accepted accounting principles.” Online at: pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AU411.aspx
55. Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession. “Final report.” October 6, 2008. Online at: tinyurl.com/6myfvw5 [PDF].
56. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. “International standard on auditing 620: Using the work of a
    auditor’s expert.” Online at: tinyurl.com/7fqgrto [PDF].
57. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. “AU section 336: Using the work of a specialist.” Online at:
    pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AU336.aspx
58. Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession, op. cit. 55, section V, pp. 5–6.


                                                                                                                                     17
18

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (7)

Results Tracker 24.07.2012,
Results Tracker 24.07.2012,Results Tracker 24.07.2012,
Results Tracker 24.07.2012,
 
Results Tracker 10.01.2013,
Results Tracker 10.01.2013,Results Tracker 10.01.2013,
Results Tracker 10.01.2013,
 
Venture Capital Fundraising Q1 05
Venture Capital Fundraising Q1 05 Venture Capital Fundraising Q1 05
Venture Capital Fundraising Q1 05
 
Venture Capital Fundraising Activity - Q1 2008
 	Venture Capital Fundraising Activity - Q1 2008   	Venture Capital Fundraising Activity - Q1 2008
Venture Capital Fundraising Activity - Q1 2008
 
Market strate june 2010
Market strate   june 2010Market strate   june 2010
Market strate june 2010
 
Venture Capital Fundraising Q3 06
 	Venture Capital Fundraising Q3 06   	Venture Capital Fundraising Q3 06
Venture Capital Fundraising Q3 06
 
Tower Group Roundtable Presentation
Tower Group Roundtable PresentationTower Group Roundtable Presentation
Tower Group Roundtable Presentation
 

Similaire à Bloomsbury integrated assurance chapter (4)

Aegon annual review 2015
Aegon annual review 2015Aegon annual review 2015
Aegon annual review 2015Aegon
 
Monterio watson evolution to ir suffolk university 29 apr12 nn
Monterio watson evolution to ir suffolk university 29 apr12 nnMonterio watson evolution to ir suffolk university 29 apr12 nn
Monterio watson evolution to ir suffolk university 29 apr12 nnWorkiva
 
Capgemini-World Insurance report 2014
Capgemini-World Insurance report 2014Capgemini-World Insurance report 2014
Capgemini-World Insurance report 2014ronn_81
 
Qantas Social Responsibility
Qantas Social ResponsibilityQantas Social Responsibility
Qantas Social ResponsibilityAdriana Wilson
 
SGS 2019 Integrated Annual Report
SGS 2019 Integrated Annual ReportSGS 2019 Integrated Annual Report
SGS 2019 Integrated Annual ReportSGS
 
Assurance Of Integrated Reports The State Of The Art
Assurance Of Integrated Reports  The State Of The ArtAssurance Of Integrated Reports  The State Of The Art
Assurance Of Integrated Reports The State Of The ArtTony Lisko
 
Groupe Keolis SAS 2015 Financial Report
Groupe Keolis SAS 2015 Financial ReportGroupe Keolis SAS 2015 Financial Report
Groupe Keolis SAS 2015 Financial ReportKeolis
 
Conference Call 4Q17
Conference Call 4Q17Conference Call 4Q17
Conference Call 4Q17ItauRI
 
Sustainable Momentum_Sustainalytics' 2014 Sustainability Report
Sustainable Momentum_Sustainalytics' 2014 Sustainability ReportSustainable Momentum_Sustainalytics' 2014 Sustainability Report
Sustainable Momentum_Sustainalytics' 2014 Sustainability ReportNina Van Ewijk
 
Audit report and going concern assumption in the face of corporate scandals i...
Audit report and going concern assumption in the face of corporate scandals i...Audit report and going concern assumption in the face of corporate scandals i...
Audit report and going concern assumption in the face of corporate scandals i...Alexander Decker
 
Ferrovial Integrated Annual Report 2015
Ferrovial Integrated Annual Report 2015Ferrovial Integrated Annual Report 2015
Ferrovial Integrated Annual Report 2015Ferrovial
 
Fin 410-final-report-1
Fin 410-final-report-1Fin 410-final-report-1
Fin 410-final-report-1shakilislamoo
 
EY's Report - The Road to Reliable Non-Financial Reporting (2016)
EY's Report - The Road to Reliable Non-Financial Reporting (2016)EY's Report - The Road to Reliable Non-Financial Reporting (2016)
EY's Report - The Road to Reliable Non-Financial Reporting (2016)Turlough Guerin GAICD FGIA
 
World Insurance Report 2014 from Capgemini and Efma
World Insurance Report 2014 from Capgemini and EfmaWorld Insurance Report 2014 from Capgemini and Efma
World Insurance Report 2014 from Capgemini and EfmaCapgemini
 

Similaire à Bloomsbury integrated assurance chapter (4) (20)

Aegon annual review 2015
Aegon annual review 2015Aegon annual review 2015
Aegon annual review 2015
 
Monterio watson evolution to ir suffolk university 29 apr12 nn
Monterio watson evolution to ir suffolk university 29 apr12 nnMonterio watson evolution to ir suffolk university 29 apr12 nn
Monterio watson evolution to ir suffolk university 29 apr12 nn
 
Mpact_IAR_FINAL.PDF
Mpact_IAR_FINAL.PDFMpact_IAR_FINAL.PDF
Mpact_IAR_FINAL.PDF
 
Résultats 2020
Résultats 2020Résultats 2020
Résultats 2020
 
Capgemini-World Insurance report 2014
Capgemini-World Insurance report 2014Capgemini-World Insurance report 2014
Capgemini-World Insurance report 2014
 
Qantas Social Responsibility
Qantas Social ResponsibilityQantas Social Responsibility
Qantas Social Responsibility
 
SGS 2019 Integrated Annual Report
SGS 2019 Integrated Annual ReportSGS 2019 Integrated Annual Report
SGS 2019 Integrated Annual Report
 
Assurance Of Integrated Reports The State Of The Art
Assurance Of Integrated Reports  The State Of The ArtAssurance Of Integrated Reports  The State Of The Art
Assurance Of Integrated Reports The State Of The Art
 
Etude solvabilite II
Etude solvabilite IIEtude solvabilite II
Etude solvabilite II
 
Groupe Keolis SAS 2015 Financial Report
Groupe Keolis SAS 2015 Financial ReportGroupe Keolis SAS 2015 Financial Report
Groupe Keolis SAS 2015 Financial Report
 
sem8.pdf
sem8.pdfsem8.pdf
sem8.pdf
 
Conference Call 4Q17
Conference Call 4Q17Conference Call 4Q17
Conference Call 4Q17
 
FINAL
FINALFINAL
FINAL
 
Sustainable Momentum_Sustainalytics' 2014 Sustainability Report
Sustainable Momentum_Sustainalytics' 2014 Sustainability ReportSustainable Momentum_Sustainalytics' 2014 Sustainability Report
Sustainable Momentum_Sustainalytics' 2014 Sustainability Report
 
The new benchmark in business reporting
The new benchmark in business reportingThe new benchmark in business reporting
The new benchmark in business reporting
 
Audit report and going concern assumption in the face of corporate scandals i...
Audit report and going concern assumption in the face of corporate scandals i...Audit report and going concern assumption in the face of corporate scandals i...
Audit report and going concern assumption in the face of corporate scandals i...
 
Ferrovial Integrated Annual Report 2015
Ferrovial Integrated Annual Report 2015Ferrovial Integrated Annual Report 2015
Ferrovial Integrated Annual Report 2015
 
Fin 410-final-report-1
Fin 410-final-report-1Fin 410-final-report-1
Fin 410-final-report-1
 
EY's Report - The Road to Reliable Non-Financial Reporting (2016)
EY's Report - The Road to Reliable Non-Financial Reporting (2016)EY's Report - The Road to Reliable Non-Financial Reporting (2016)
EY's Report - The Road to Reliable Non-Financial Reporting (2016)
 
World Insurance Report 2014 from Capgemini and Efma
World Insurance Report 2014 from Capgemini and EfmaWorld Insurance Report 2014 from Capgemini and Efma
World Insurance Report 2014 from Capgemini and Efma
 

Plus de Workiva

Workiva Blog 03_19 - WHATS YOUR STATUTORY REPORTING FOR NON-FINACIAL DATA STR...
Workiva Blog 03_19 - WHATS YOUR STATUTORY REPORTING FOR NON-FINACIAL DATA STR...Workiva Blog 03_19 - WHATS YOUR STATUTORY REPORTING FOR NON-FINACIAL DATA STR...
Workiva Blog 03_19 - WHATS YOUR STATUTORY REPORTING FOR NON-FINACIAL DATA STR...Workiva
 
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN CARBON ACCOUNTING AND DEFINE WHAT A CARBON LEDGER ...
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN CARBON ACCOUNTING AND DEFINE WHAT A CARBON LEDGER ...CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN CARBON ACCOUNTING AND DEFINE WHAT A CARBON LEDGER ...
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN CARBON ACCOUNTING AND DEFINE WHAT A CARBON LEDGER ...Workiva
 
COP 27 host Bellona and CIFF - Digital Sustainability Disclosures
COP 27 host Bellona and CIFF - Digital Sustainability Disclosures COP 27 host Bellona and CIFF - Digital Sustainability Disclosures
COP 27 host Bellona and CIFF - Digital Sustainability Disclosures Workiva
 
A digital transformation of the sustainability information flows (
A digital transformation  of  the sustainability information flows  (A digital transformation  of  the sustainability information flows  (
A digital transformation of the sustainability information flows (Workiva
 
United states if air force academy april 2020 liv apneseth watson
United states if air force academy   april 2020 liv apneseth watsonUnited states if air force academy   april 2020 liv apneseth watson
United states if air force academy april 2020 liv apneseth watsonWorkiva
 
The digital transformation of compliance and business reporting and the role...
The digital transformation of compliance and business reporting and  the role...The digital transformation of compliance and business reporting and  the role...
The digital transformation of compliance and business reporting and the role...Workiva
 
The Digital Transformation of RegData and the Role of the management accoun...
The Digital Transformation  of RegData and the  Role of the management accoun...The Digital Transformation  of RegData and the  Role of the management accoun...
The Digital Transformation of RegData and the Role of the management accoun...Workiva
 
XBRL - Experience and Best Practice
XBRL - Experience and Best PracticeXBRL - Experience and Best Practice
XBRL - Experience and Best PracticeWorkiva
 
XBRL - A Common Language For Data Reporting / Kyiv, 25-26 April 2019
XBRL - A Common Language For Data Reporting  / Kyiv, 25-26 April 2019XBRL - A Common Language For Data Reporting  / Kyiv, 25-26 April 2019
XBRL - A Common Language For Data Reporting / Kyiv, 25-26 April 2019Workiva
 
Auditing and Assurance Update on Non-Financial Information
Auditing and Assurance Update on Non-Financial InformationAuditing and Assurance Update on Non-Financial Information
Auditing and Assurance Update on Non-Financial InformationWorkiva
 
Why Corporate Natural Capital Accounting (CNCA) and XBRL is Important for Bus...
Why Corporate Natural Capital Accounting (CNCA) and XBRL is Important for Bus...Why Corporate Natural Capital Accounting (CNCA) and XBRL is Important for Bus...
Why Corporate Natural Capital Accounting (CNCA) and XBRL is Important for Bus...Workiva
 
Liv watson 11.2017 data amplified xbrl international paris
Liv watson 11.2017 data amplified   xbrl international  paris Liv watson 11.2017 data amplified   xbrl international  paris
Liv watson 11.2017 data amplified xbrl international paris Workiva
 
Investor Forum NYC - Structured data roundup a global overview of structured ...
Investor Forum NYC - Structured data roundup a global overview of structured ...Investor Forum NYC - Structured data roundup a global overview of structured ...
Investor Forum NYC - Structured data roundup a global overview of structured ...Workiva
 
TODE17 The Programmable RegTech Ecosystem
TODE17  The Programmable RegTech Ecosystem TODE17  The Programmable RegTech Ecosystem
TODE17 The Programmable RegTech Ecosystem Workiva
 
TODE 17 How Assurance and Emerging Audit Technologies
TODE 17 How Assurance and Emerging Audit Technologies TODE 17 How Assurance and Emerging Audit Technologies
TODE 17 How Assurance and Emerging Audit Technologies Workiva
 
The Management Accountant in a Digital World The interface of strategy, tech...
The Management Accountant in a Digital World  The interface of strategy, tech...The Management Accountant in a Digital World  The interface of strategy, tech...
The Management Accountant in a Digital World The interface of strategy, tech...Workiva
 
The programmable RegTech Eco System by Liv Apneseth Watson
The programmable RegTech Eco System by Liv Apneseth WatsonThe programmable RegTech Eco System by Liv Apneseth Watson
The programmable RegTech Eco System by Liv Apneseth WatsonWorkiva
 
Blockchain and XBRL at the 2017 American Accounting Association presented b...
 Blockchain and XBRL at the  2017 American Accounting Association presented b... Blockchain and XBRL at the  2017 American Accounting Association presented b...
Blockchain and XBRL at the 2017 American Accounting Association presented b...Workiva
 
The Impact of Technology on Audit at PIOB Madrid - presented by Liv Apneseth...
The Impact of Technology on Audit  at PIOB Madrid - presented by Liv Apneseth...The Impact of Technology on Audit  at PIOB Madrid - presented by Liv Apneseth...
The Impact of Technology on Audit at PIOB Madrid - presented by Liv Apneseth...Workiva
 
Natural capital accounting presentation at the xbrl euro filing 2017 presente...
Natural capital accounting presentation at the xbrl euro filing 2017 presente...Natural capital accounting presentation at the xbrl euro filing 2017 presente...
Natural capital accounting presentation at the xbrl euro filing 2017 presente...Workiva
 

Plus de Workiva (20)

Workiva Blog 03_19 - WHATS YOUR STATUTORY REPORTING FOR NON-FINACIAL DATA STR...
Workiva Blog 03_19 - WHATS YOUR STATUTORY REPORTING FOR NON-FINACIAL DATA STR...Workiva Blog 03_19 - WHATS YOUR STATUTORY REPORTING FOR NON-FINACIAL DATA STR...
Workiva Blog 03_19 - WHATS YOUR STATUTORY REPORTING FOR NON-FINACIAL DATA STR...
 
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN CARBON ACCOUNTING AND DEFINE WHAT A CARBON LEDGER ...
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN CARBON ACCOUNTING AND DEFINE WHAT A CARBON LEDGER ...CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN CARBON ACCOUNTING AND DEFINE WHAT A CARBON LEDGER ...
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN CARBON ACCOUNTING AND DEFINE WHAT A CARBON LEDGER ...
 
COP 27 host Bellona and CIFF - Digital Sustainability Disclosures
COP 27 host Bellona and CIFF - Digital Sustainability Disclosures COP 27 host Bellona and CIFF - Digital Sustainability Disclosures
COP 27 host Bellona and CIFF - Digital Sustainability Disclosures
 
A digital transformation of the sustainability information flows (
A digital transformation  of  the sustainability information flows  (A digital transformation  of  the sustainability information flows  (
A digital transformation of the sustainability information flows (
 
United states if air force academy april 2020 liv apneseth watson
United states if air force academy   april 2020 liv apneseth watsonUnited states if air force academy   april 2020 liv apneseth watson
United states if air force academy april 2020 liv apneseth watson
 
The digital transformation of compliance and business reporting and the role...
The digital transformation of compliance and business reporting and  the role...The digital transformation of compliance and business reporting and  the role...
The digital transformation of compliance and business reporting and the role...
 
The Digital Transformation of RegData and the Role of the management accoun...
The Digital Transformation  of RegData and the  Role of the management accoun...The Digital Transformation  of RegData and the  Role of the management accoun...
The Digital Transformation of RegData and the Role of the management accoun...
 
XBRL - Experience and Best Practice
XBRL - Experience and Best PracticeXBRL - Experience and Best Practice
XBRL - Experience and Best Practice
 
XBRL - A Common Language For Data Reporting / Kyiv, 25-26 April 2019
XBRL - A Common Language For Data Reporting  / Kyiv, 25-26 April 2019XBRL - A Common Language For Data Reporting  / Kyiv, 25-26 April 2019
XBRL - A Common Language For Data Reporting / Kyiv, 25-26 April 2019
 
Auditing and Assurance Update on Non-Financial Information
Auditing and Assurance Update on Non-Financial InformationAuditing and Assurance Update on Non-Financial Information
Auditing and Assurance Update on Non-Financial Information
 
Why Corporate Natural Capital Accounting (CNCA) and XBRL is Important for Bus...
Why Corporate Natural Capital Accounting (CNCA) and XBRL is Important for Bus...Why Corporate Natural Capital Accounting (CNCA) and XBRL is Important for Bus...
Why Corporate Natural Capital Accounting (CNCA) and XBRL is Important for Bus...
 
Liv watson 11.2017 data amplified xbrl international paris
Liv watson 11.2017 data amplified   xbrl international  paris Liv watson 11.2017 data amplified   xbrl international  paris
Liv watson 11.2017 data amplified xbrl international paris
 
Investor Forum NYC - Structured data roundup a global overview of structured ...
Investor Forum NYC - Structured data roundup a global overview of structured ...Investor Forum NYC - Structured data roundup a global overview of structured ...
Investor Forum NYC - Structured data roundup a global overview of structured ...
 
TODE17 The Programmable RegTech Ecosystem
TODE17  The Programmable RegTech Ecosystem TODE17  The Programmable RegTech Ecosystem
TODE17 The Programmable RegTech Ecosystem
 
TODE 17 How Assurance and Emerging Audit Technologies
TODE 17 How Assurance and Emerging Audit Technologies TODE 17 How Assurance and Emerging Audit Technologies
TODE 17 How Assurance and Emerging Audit Technologies
 
The Management Accountant in a Digital World The interface of strategy, tech...
The Management Accountant in a Digital World  The interface of strategy, tech...The Management Accountant in a Digital World  The interface of strategy, tech...
The Management Accountant in a Digital World The interface of strategy, tech...
 
The programmable RegTech Eco System by Liv Apneseth Watson
The programmable RegTech Eco System by Liv Apneseth WatsonThe programmable RegTech Eco System by Liv Apneseth Watson
The programmable RegTech Eco System by Liv Apneseth Watson
 
Blockchain and XBRL at the 2017 American Accounting Association presented b...
 Blockchain and XBRL at the  2017 American Accounting Association presented b... Blockchain and XBRL at the  2017 American Accounting Association presented b...
Blockchain and XBRL at the 2017 American Accounting Association presented b...
 
The Impact of Technology on Audit at PIOB Madrid - presented by Liv Apneseth...
The Impact of Technology on Audit  at PIOB Madrid - presented by Liv Apneseth...The Impact of Technology on Audit  at PIOB Madrid - presented by Liv Apneseth...
The Impact of Technology on Audit at PIOB Madrid - presented by Liv Apneseth...
 
Natural capital accounting presentation at the xbrl euro filing 2017 presente...
Natural capital accounting presentation at the xbrl euro filing 2017 presente...Natural capital accounting presentation at the xbrl euro filing 2017 presente...
Natural capital accounting presentation at the xbrl euro filing 2017 presente...
 

Dernier

Buy and Sell Urban Tots unlisted shares.pptx
Buy and Sell Urban Tots unlisted shares.pptxBuy and Sell Urban Tots unlisted shares.pptx
Buy and Sell Urban Tots unlisted shares.pptxPrecize Formely Leadoff
 
Contracts with Interdependent Preferences
Contracts with Interdependent PreferencesContracts with Interdependent Preferences
Contracts with Interdependent PreferencesGRAPE
 
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]Commonwealth
 
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB fundingWork and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB fundingHenry Tapper
 
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an EntrepreneurIntroduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneurabcisahunter
 
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
2024.03 Strategic Resources PresentationAdnet Communications
 
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023SkillCircle
 
Taipei, A Hidden Jewel in East Asia - PR Strategy for Tourism
Taipei, A Hidden Jewel in East Asia - PR Strategy for TourismTaipei, A Hidden Jewel in East Asia - PR Strategy for Tourism
Taipei, A Hidden Jewel in East Asia - PR Strategy for TourismBrian Lin
 
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdfStock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdfMichael Silva
 
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.Arifa Saeed
 
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdfLundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdfAdnet Communications
 
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdfStock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdfMichael Silva
 
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...Matthews Bantsijang
 
Sarlat Advisory - Corporate Brochure - 2024
Sarlat Advisory - Corporate Brochure - 2024Sarlat Advisory - Corporate Brochure - 2024
Sarlat Advisory - Corporate Brochure - 2024Guillaume Ⓥ Sarlat
 
LIC PRIVATISATION its a bane or boon.pptx
LIC PRIVATISATION its a bane or boon.pptxLIC PRIVATISATION its a bane or boon.pptx
LIC PRIVATISATION its a bane or boon.pptxsonamyadav7097
 
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal. .pptx
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal.    .pptx20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal.    .pptx
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal. .pptxFinTech Belgium
 

Dernier (20)

Buy and Sell Urban Tots unlisted shares.pptx
Buy and Sell Urban Tots unlisted shares.pptxBuy and Sell Urban Tots unlisted shares.pptx
Buy and Sell Urban Tots unlisted shares.pptx
 
Contracts with Interdependent Preferences
Contracts with Interdependent PreferencesContracts with Interdependent Preferences
Contracts with Interdependent Preferences
 
Commercial Bank Economic Capsule - March 2024
Commercial Bank Economic Capsule - March 2024Commercial Bank Economic Capsule - March 2024
Commercial Bank Economic Capsule - March 2024
 
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
 
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB fundingWork and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
 
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an EntrepreneurIntroduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
 
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
 
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
 
Taipei, A Hidden Jewel in East Asia - PR Strategy for Tourism
Taipei, A Hidden Jewel in East Asia - PR Strategy for TourismTaipei, A Hidden Jewel in East Asia - PR Strategy for Tourism
Taipei, A Hidden Jewel in East Asia - PR Strategy for Tourism
 
New Monthly Enterprises Survey. Issue 21. (01.2024) Ukrainian Business in War...
New Monthly Enterprises Survey. Issue 21. (01.2024) Ukrainian Business in War...New Monthly Enterprises Survey. Issue 21. (01.2024) Ukrainian Business in War...
New Monthly Enterprises Survey. Issue 21. (01.2024) Ukrainian Business in War...
 
Effects & Policies Of Bank Consolidation
Effects & Policies Of Bank ConsolidationEffects & Policies Of Bank Consolidation
Effects & Policies Of Bank Consolidation
 
Monthly Economic Monitoring of Ukraine No.230, March 2024
Monthly Economic Monitoring of Ukraine No.230, March 2024Monthly Economic Monitoring of Ukraine No.230, March 2024
Monthly Economic Monitoring of Ukraine No.230, March 2024
 
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdfStock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
 
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
 
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdfLundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
 
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdfStock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
 
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
 
Sarlat Advisory - Corporate Brochure - 2024
Sarlat Advisory - Corporate Brochure - 2024Sarlat Advisory - Corporate Brochure - 2024
Sarlat Advisory - Corporate Brochure - 2024
 
LIC PRIVATISATION its a bane or boon.pptx
LIC PRIVATISATION its a bane or boon.pptxLIC PRIVATISATION its a bane or boon.pptx
LIC PRIVATISATION its a bane or boon.pptx
 
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal. .pptx
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal.    .pptx20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal.    .pptx
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal. .pptx
 

Bloomsbury integrated assurance chapter (4)

  • 1. Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance by Robert G. Eccles,a Michael P. Krzus,b and Liv A. Watsonc a Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA b Mike Krzus Consulting, Chicago, Illinois, USA c XBRL International, Clark, New Jersey, USA This Chapter Covers 8 brief background on integrated reporting and the important role the A accounting profession has played in developing it. 8 he meaning of “materiality” for both financial and nonfinancial information. T 8 he key challenges faced in providing an integrated assurance opinion. T 8 ecommendations for overcoming these challenges in order to make integrated R assurance opinions a reality. Introduction Interest in integrated reporting is growing around the world. It is now required in South Africa by the approximately 450 companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange on a “comply or explain why not” basis.1 Although other countries may follow South Africa’s lead and mandate integrated reporting over the next several years, today it is an otherwise entirely voluntary activity by companies. Nevertheless, a growing number of companies are adopting it because of the substantial benefits they receive, including a better understanding of the relationship between financial and nonfinancial performance, improved internal measurement and control systems for producing reliable and timely nonfinancial information, lower reputational risk, greater employee engagement, more committed customers who care about sustainability, more long-term investors who value sustainable strategies, and improved relationships with other stakeholders.2 There are approximately 240 companies using the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) G3 Guidelines that identified themselves as producing an integrated report during 2010.3 Although many of these are European companies, notable companies producing an integrated report in the United States include American Electric Power, Pfizer, PepsiCo, Southwest Airlines, and United Technologies Corporation. In nearly all cases, the companies that produced an integrated report first started out by producing a corporate social responsibility or sustainability report.4 The number of such reports has grown dramatically over the last 10 years. For example, data from CorporateRegister.com showed 3,287 companies publishing a sustainability report in 2010, compared to 830 companies in 2001.5 Similarly, the number of GRI reporters had grown from 125 in 2001 to 1,864 in 2010.6 1
  • 2. Effective Auditing for Corporates Though the growth in sustainability reporting is impressive, the growth in the extent to which these reports have any form of assurance on them, whether by a Big Four accounting firm or a specialist boutique, is less impressive. As shown in Table 1, in 2010 Spain had the largest percentage of companies obtaining an assurance opinion on their report, at 44%, and the United States had the lowest, at 6%. Providing an assurance opinion on nonfinancial information is a necessary, albeit incomplete, step toward providing an integrated assurance opinion. Table 1. Sustainability reports with an external assurance statement 2001–107 2001 2010 Sustainability Sustainability Proportion Sustainability Sustainability Proportion reports reports of reports reports reports of reports issued with with issued with with assurance assurance assurance assurance (%) (%) Australia 117 31 26 248 52 21 Canada 61 4 7 213 26 12 Denmark 26 16 62 74 20 25 Finland 27 6 22 71 19 27 France 29 3 10 223 32 14 Italy 58 30 52 566 66 12 Japan 164 25 15 558 56 10 Netherlands 46 14 30 159 39 25 Norway 35 8 23 52 12 23 South Africa 9 4 44 119 29 24 Spain 12 3 25 256 113 44 Sweden 37 6 16 163 49 30 United 169 62 37 566 107 19 Kingdom United 156 10 6 629 37 6 States We believe that the full value of integrated reporting will only be realized when integrated assurance is provided on the report. After all, how much would investors rely on financial reports if they weren’t accompanied by an audit? It is the audit that, despite the occasional shortcoming, makes financial reports reliable and comparable. Reliability comes from the fact that the user knows that an objective third party has carefully reviewed the reported figures to ensure that the report has been prepared according to the relevant accounting standards—typically, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP). 2
  • 3. Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance Comparability of information across companies, at least within a country and a sector, comes from the fact that they have used the same accounting standards and that the auditor has used audit procedures that are subject to oversight and review to ensure their efficacy in ensuring the reliability of the reported information. To make integrated reports as reliable and comparable as financial reports, an integrated assurance opinion will have to be provided. Ideally, it will be in the form of “positive assurance” (“the company did it right”) rather than the “negative assurance” (“nothing leaped out at us as terribly wrong”) that is typically provided today. What we are calling for are “integrated audits” that have the same degree of rigor, including the review of internal systems and controls, as today’s financial audits. And while we prefer the term “integrated audit” to “integrated assurance” to reinforce this connotation, we will use the latter because the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in the United States has already established its own, and much more limited, definition of an “integrated audit.”8 The US Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 established the PCAOB as the US standard-setter for audits of public companies and reserved the term “audit” for an examination of financial statements.9 Similarly, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) limits use of the term “audit” to an examination of the financial statements.10 The IAASB is the audit and assurance standard-setting organization of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).11 In this chapter we will provide some brief background on integrated reporting and the important role which the accounting profession has already played in developing it, discuss the meaning of “materiality” for both financial and nonfinancial information, identify the key challenges in providing an integrated assurance opinion, and make recommendations for overcoming these challenges in order to make integrated assurance opinions a reality. Background on Integrated Reporting On August 2, 2010, the Prince of Wales’ Accounting for Sustainability (A4S) project and the GRI announced the formation of the International Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC).12 The mission of the IIRC is “To create a globally accepted integrated reporting framework which brings together financial, environmental, social and governance information in a clear, concise, consistent and comparable format”13 in order to “help business to take more sustainable decisions and enable investors and other stakeholders to understand how an organization is really performing.”14 The accounting profession, through participation in the IIRC and in other ways, has already made a substantial contribution to the integrated reporting movement. Representatives from seven accounting associations (ACCA, CICPA, CIMA, FASB, IASB, ICAEW, and IFAC) and six accounting firms (BDO Seidman, Deloitte Touche Tomahtsu, Ernst & Young, Grant Thornton, KPMG, and PricewaterhouseCoopers) sit on the steering committee of the IIRC.15 These firms have also contributed valuable resources in the form of secondments. Deloitte,16 Ernst & Young,17 KPMG,18 and PricewaterhouseCoopers19 have all written white papers on integrated reporting. On July 27, 2011, the ACCA sponsored a live broadcast “Integrated reporting: A framework for the future” as part of their annual Research and Insights Conference.20 It is our hope that these firms and associations will soon start contributing ideas and resources to the topic of integrated assurance. 3
  • 4. Effective Auditing for Corporates Integrated reporting involves reporting both financial and nonfinancial (environmental, social, and governance (ESG)) information in a single document, ideally showing the relationship between the two in terms of how strong performance on ESG issues contributes to strong financial performance and vice versa. A recent study by Eccles, Ioannou, and Serafeim (2011) shows that a set of 90 “high sustainability” firms significantly outperform a matched set of 90 “low sustainability” firms, providing evidence that attention to ESG issues contributes to financial performance.21 Today all listed companies are required to report on their financial performance on at least an annual basis, but reporting on nonfinancial performance is a voluntary exercise in most countries. We believe that integrated reporting of both financial and nonfinancial performance should ultimately be mandated. Ioannou and Serafeim (2011) have shown the benefits to companies and society of mandated ESG reporting.22 The same, and even more so, will be true of integrated reporting. What is Integrated Reporting? In simple terms, integrated reporting combines a company’s key financial and nonfinancial information into a single document. However, the integration of financial and nonfinancial reporting is about much more than publishing a single paper document. An integrated report serves as a means of reporting financial and nonfinancial information in a way that explains their impact on each other, answering a fundamental question: Just how does nonfinancial performance contribute to financial performance, and vice versa? The International Integrated Reporting Committee’s discussion paper23 adds, “Integrated Reporting brings together material information about an organization’s strategy, governance, performance and prospects in a way that reflects the commercial, social and environmental context within which it operates. It provides a clear and concise representation of how an organization demonstrates stewardship and how it creates and sustains value.” Integrated reporting has the potential to significantly change how both companies and investors make capital allocation decisions, shifting the focus from that of meeting short-term financial goals to developing a long-term business strategy that defines sustainability as the creation of economic value over the long-term. Integrated reporting involves more than a static document. It also entails providing performance information in a more integrated way on the company’s website, along with providing more detailed information of particular interest to shareholders and other stakeholders. Analytical tools for exploring the relationship between financial and nonfinancial performance using data from the company and other sources, as well as comparing the company’s performance to its competitors, can also be provided. Finally, the company’s website can be used to improve its dialogue and engagement with all stakeholders. Integrated reporting is as much about listening as it is about talking.24 4
  • 5. Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance Long-term sustainable value creation requires the company to take a holistic view of the consequences of its decisions regarding financial, natural, and human resources in terms of how decisions about each type of resource affects the others. It also requires good governance and risk management in order to ensure that decisions producing short-term performance do not threaten the company’s long-term performance or, in more extreme cases, even existence. As expressed by the IIRC, through integrated reporting a company is able “to demonstrate the linkages between an organization’s strategy, governance and financial performance and the social, environmental and economic context within which it operates. The IIRC’s Framework will support an organization in addressing, in a clear and concise manner, the material issues affecting its ability to create and sustain value in the short, medium, and longer term.”25 Sustainable Strategies and Value Creation Companies operate in a multi-faceted world. The global economy is complex and intertwined, the demand for finite natural resources is accelerating, and the lingering effects of the 2008 financial crisis have left society skeptical and untrusting of corporations. Accordingly, a company’s strategy and business must reflect an inherent understanding of the relationships between the economic, governance, environmental, and social dimensions of performance. A sustainable strategy sets a company on a course towards value creation over the long term. Sustainable strategies include, but are not limited to (Eccles and Krzus, 2010): 1. Long-term view. Sustainable strategies require a long-term view by the company and, by implication, its shareholders, who are one class of stakeholder. 2. Multiple-stakeholder perspective. Sustainable strategies require the recognition of the legitimacy of the interests of other stakeholders, who must also take a long-term view. 3. Engagement processes. Sustainable strategies depend upon processes of engagement for understanding the expectations of all stakeholders. 4. Value creation for all stakeholders. Doing so contributes to value creation for shareholders as well as to meeting the needs of other stakeholders. Failure to adopt a sustainable strategy will put a company’s reputation and its ability to create shareholder value at risk. Success in the 21st century will belong to organizations that have learned to balance the imperative for long- term viability of the company and the world it relies on to create economic value, with the demands for short-term competitiveness and profitability. Integrated reporting is both the most effective way for a company with a sustainable strategy to report on its performance and a form of discipline to ensure that it has a sustainable strategy in the first place. Integrated assurance will enhance the credibility of the integrated report to both management and investors, thereby increasing its utility to both. 5
  • 6. Effective Auditing for Corporates The seeds for an integrated assurance opinion are already being sown. For example, KPMG does both the financial audit and provides negative assurance on the nonfinancial information reported by Philips Electronics in its integrated report.26 PricewaterhouseCoopers does the same for the Novo Nordisk integrated report.27 But to get to a single integrated audit assurance opinion, the question of defining “materiality” for nonfinancial information needs to be addressed. Case Study The Challenges of Integrated Assurance at Philips Electronics Interest in nonfinancial (e.g., environmental, social, and governance) information is growing (see Eccles, Krzus, and Serafeim, 2011). From an investor perspective, a link between sustainability performance and a company’s ability to create economic value over the long term has been demonstrated (see Eccles, Ioannou, and Serafeim, 2011). Credibility is one of the keys to increased demand for, and more widespread acceptance of, nonfinancial information by shareholders and other stakeholders. An increasing number of companies have asked their auditor to provide an assurance report on their nonfinancial information. KPMG found that of the 250 largest companies publishing environmental, social, and governance reports, 46% of those reports include formal assurance. This is up from 29% in 2002.28 One of the issues facing companies when they contemplate a request for positive rather than negative assurance on their nonfinancial information is data quality. Sustainability and other nonfinancial information are not typically produced by systems subject to robust controls and processes, as is financial information. As a result, assurance providers may not be able to apply their methodologies and procedures to nonfinancial information. This doesn’t mean that the data are inherently inaccurate. However, sustainability managers will be required to establish preventive and detective controls and complete internal control questionnaires for systems and processes. A complicating factor for both Philips and KPMG is the absence of generally accepted global standards for measuring and reporting nonfinancial information. Standards promote reporting that provides relevant and useful information to stakeholders. Standards are necessary so that nonfinancial information is meaningful, especially across sectors. Absent standards, comparative analysis is virtually impossible. The discussion about integrated assurance at Philips challenged KPMG to carefully weigh the benefits and risks of providing assurance on nonfinancial information. Certainly, KPMG was in a position to develop a new revenue stream. However, KPMG—like the other Big Four accounting firms—realize that their market position depends on the firm’s credibility and reputation. Anything that threatened the firm’s reputation would be thoroughly and cautiously reviewed. While some might argue that financial statement audit methodologies can be easily applied to nonfinancial information, neither KPMG nor other audit firms had fully developed approaches to provide positive assurance on nonfinancial information. The lack of nonfinancial accounting standards and related high quality assurance methodologies for nonfinancial information prevented KPMG from delivering an integrated assurance report. The process to deliver integrated financial and nonfinancial assurance required a significant investment of time and people at both Philips and KPMG. Ultimately, Philips shareholders and other stakeholders need to respond to the question of whether the increased quality and reliability provided by assurance on nonfinancial information will be judged as adding value. 6
  • 7. Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance Materiality The IIRC, quoted above, refers to “the material issues” that affect the organization’s “ability to create and sustain value in the short, medium, and longer term.” The concept of materiality is critical to both financial statement disclosure and the reporting of nonfinancial information. In addition, judgments about materiality influence accounting firms’ audit and assurance processes. Ultimately, each user of business information—management, shareholders, analysts, regulators, civil society, and a variety of others—determines what is material. The omission or misstatement of an item in a financial report is material if, in consideration of relevant facts and circumstances, the magnitude of the item is such that it is probable that the judgment of a reasonable person would be changed or influenced by the inclusion or correction of the item. In other words, a matter is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable person would consider it important. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) captured this point when both organizations adopted the same definition of materiality. Materiality is “…an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature or magnitude (or both) of the items to which the information relates in the context of an individual entity’s financial report.”29, 30 The concept of materiality in financial reporting has both quantitative (nature) and qualitative (magnitude) aspects. Regulators and standard-setters often state that materiality cannot be reduced to a numerical formula, yet numerical “rules of thumb,” such as 5% of earnings before income taxes or 10% of a given account balance, are often used as a basis for determining materiality. Since the determination of what is material must reflect both the nature and the magnitude of an item, simply quantifying the magnitude of an error or misstatement in percentage terms cannot be used as a substitute for a full analysis of relevant considerations. Qualitative factors, such as: 8 whether the misstatement masks a change in earnings or other trends, 8 whether the misstatement hides a failure to meet analysts’ earnings expectations, 8 whether the misstatement changes a loss into income or vice versa, 8 or whether the misstatement affects the compliance with laws or regulations, may cause quantitatively small amounts to be material. The Supreme Court of the United States reinforced the importance of considering qualitative and quantitative factors by ruling that a fact is material if there is “a substantial likelihood that the… fact would have been viewed by the reasonable investor as having significantly altered the ‘total mix’ of information made available.”31 Materiality guidance for auditors of financial statements is similar to guidance provided to companies in preparing their financial statements. For example, the IAASB does not prescribe any specific methodology for determining materiality, but states that “The auditor’s determination of materiality is a matter of professional judgment, and is affected by the auditor’s perception of the financial information needs of users of the financial statements.”32 Similarly, the PCAOB does not prescribe any methodology for determining materiality. Instead, the PCAOB standard refers to a US Supreme Court decision.33 7
  • 8. Effective Auditing for Corporates There are no standards for the preparation of nonfinancial information equivalent to either IFRS or US GAAP, and there is therefore no materiality guidance for companies. Yet there is guidance on assurance and attestation methodologies, and the international and US versions are very similar. The IAASB and the PCAOB use the terms “assurance” and “attestation” in reference to engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information. PCAOB guidance on attestation states: “In expressing a conclusion, the practitioner should consider an omission or a misstatement to be material if the omission or misstatement—individually or when aggregated with others—is such that a reasonable person would be influenced by the omission or misstatement. The practitioner should consider both qualitative and quantitative aspects of omissions and misstatements.”34 Note that the term “reasonable person” anticipates users of the information other than investors. Similarly, the IAASB provides the following guidance to assurance providers: “Materiality is considered in the context of quantitative and qualitative factors, such as relative magnitude, the nature and extent of the effect of these factors on the evaluation or measurement of the subject matter, and the interests of the intended users. The assessment of materiality and the relative importance of quantitative and qualitative factors in a particular engagement are matters for the practitioner’s judgment.”35 Again, the term “users” is clearly a broader one than “investors,” raising the question of whether materiality lies in the eyes of the beholder. In summary, international and US guidance on materiality for financial and nonfinancial information is substantively the same and can be broken into two parts. First, materiality is a matter of professional judgment. Second, the determination of materiality is based on the company’s and the auditor’s perceptions of the information needs of users. Both of these elements pose challenges to companies and assurance providers. There is also the question of whether the absence of detailed rules or fear of litigation inhibits professionals from exercising judgment. Another issue is whether it is possible to know if a “reasonable person” would consider a given matter to be important enough to influence his or her decision-making. Given that authoritative guidelines for determining materiality for nonfinancial information are very general at best, companies are developing their own ways to put this concept into practice. According to the CorporateRegister.com database,36 almost 3,300 sustainability reports were published in 2010, and approximately 800 of those reports included a discussion of materiality. Seventy-one of these 800 companies presented a materiality matrix to identify matters that were important to stakeholders and to the company. Like the reports themselves, there was a wide range in the quality of the disclosures within the materiality matrix. For example: 8 Banco Bradesco used a materiality matrix in its 2009 report, but did not populate it.37 8 BASF did not provide a materiality matrix in the paper version of the BASF Report 2009, but provided a link to an online matrix. Clicking on a topic takes the reader to a more detailed discussion of the issue. The company identified approximately 40 key issues (i.e., ranking higher than 0.5 on a scale of 0.0 to 1.0).38 8
  • 9. Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance 8 L’Oréal mapped topics of concern to stakeholders and relevance to the company and, similar to BASF, clicking on a link in the online 2009 sustainability report enabled a reader to download a factsheet summarizing L’Oréal’s approach to these challenges.39 8 Petrobras disclosed over 40 issues in their 2009 sustainability report as highly relevant to stakeholders and the company.40 8 SolarWorld noted in its 2009 annual report that materiality is determined by the economic, environmental, and social impact of the topics and indicators. However, the materiality matrix did not specifically identify any issues.41 8 State Street Corporation disclosed a small number of critical issues in its 2009 materiality matrix. Key topics and concerns included the company’s role as a fiduciary, marketplace issues in the current environment, business conduct, community impacts, and fraud and corruption.42 The materiality disclosures of the six companies identified above are representative of the information provided by the 71 companies that provide a materiality matrix. These companies are trying in their own ways to understand which issues should influence their decisions and actions in order to deliver on dimensions of performance that are important to the company, its shareholders, and other stakeholders. From these examples, the following questions are raised that will need to be addressed in providing integrated assurance opinions: (1) How are the dimensions of the matrices defined? (2) What is the value of providing a materiality matrix without reporting on what issues the company regards as material? (3) How does materiality differ across groups, such as shareholders vs. stakeholders? (4) Can 40 or 50 nonfinancial factors truly be material? Challenges to Providing an Integrated Assurance Opinion There are three major challenges to producing an integrated assurance opinion: 8 developing a global set of credible standards for measuring and reporting nonfinancial information which have the appropriate governmental support, just as is true for accounting standards; 8 developing methodologies for providing positive assurance on nonfinancial information; 8 integrating standards and assurance methodologies for financial and nonfinancial information in a way that provides a “true and fair view of an organization’s sustainability.” Credible Standards for Measuring and Reporting Nonfinancial Information Standards for nonfinancial information provide the foundation for being able to provide an integrated assurance opinion that is backed by the same degree of rigor as a financial audit. This is also the most difficult challenge and one fraught with contention, as is always the case when establishing standards. Two issues must be addressed. The first is “Who should be responsible for doing this?” Today there are a number of organizations that are doing good work in this domain, such as: 9
  • 10. Effective Auditing for Corporates 8 The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). As the secretariat to the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), the CDP has developed the Climate Change Reporting Framework.43 Modeled in some ways after how accounting standards are set and with significant input from the Big Four firms, the CDSB has established standards for measuring carbon emissions and could build on this work to set standards for other environmental issues, such as water. 8 The European Federation of Financial Analyst Societies (EFFAS). EFFAS built on work done by the Society of Investment Professionals in Germany (DVFA) and published its own set of key performance indicators with an emphasis on information that is of particular interest to investors.44 These standards are both general and industry-specific, which is also true of the G3 Guidelines. 8 The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The GRI is one of the oldest standard- setting organizations for nonfinancial information and its G3 Guidelines for economic, environmental, and social metrics are currently the most commonly used set of standards for reporting on ESG performance. The GRI is currently working on developing its G4 Guidelines to ensure that its efforts support the work of the IIRC.45 In August 2011, the GRI launched a G4 Public Comment Period46 to solicit comments and ideas from organizational stakeholders and the public to help shape G4. 8 The International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The ISO published ISO 14000,47 which focuses on environmental management systems, and ISO 26000,48 and addresses matters of social responsibility. 8 Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS). IRIS developed performance indicators and metrics for companies and investors. The indicators are organized in a framework that is designed to apply across sectors and geographies.49 8 The Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD). The OECD published its most recent version of “Guidelines for reporting by multinational enterprises” in 2008.50 8 The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). UNCTAD’s Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting (ISAR) released voluntary guidance in 2008 to assist enterprises in their efforts to communicate with investors and other stakeholders.51 The GRI, the CDSB, the DVFA, and other groups attempting to set standards for nonfinancial information need to collaborate rather than compete with each other so that the history of “country-GAAP” does not repeat itself. Assuming that this cooperation emerges—an admittedly big assumption—the question then becomes “How will these standards become institutionally legitimized and enforced?” Accounting standards, such as those set by the FASB in the United States, are ultimately backed by governmental authority; for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States. Little to no such governmental support exists for the work done by the organizations cited above. Until it does, companies will not know which set of standards to use, comparability of performance measures across companies will be compromised, and the ultimate reliability of the reported information will be in doubt. 10
  • 11. Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance Methodologies for Providing Assurance on Nonfinancial Information The second challenge is to develop audit methodologies—and we use the term “audit” on purpose—for nonfinancial information that are as rigorous as they are for financial information. Having a rigorous and institutionally legitimate set of standards for nonfinancial information greatly facilitates the development of audit methodologies. Procedures for evaluating the quality of the internal control and measurement systems also need to be developed. Though a crude metric, we suggest that that the hours (and costs) of auditing nonfinancial information should be roughly the same level as for financial information. Today there are orders-of-magnitude differences between the two—one of many factors that contribute to the greater attention paid to financial information. One obvious concern is whether this will lead to a “windfall” for external auditors’ fees. If the auditing profession is providing a valued service, it should be paid for doing so. Our view is that shareholders will ultimately determine the level of effort and cost applied to the audit of nonfinancial information, and thus the fees paid to those who perform these audits, based on the value shareholders are getting from having more reliable information. We also believe that technology can be used to dramatically reduce the cost of integrated audits, although this will depend on the development of standards for nonfinancial information which, in turn, requires a clear concept of materiality for nonfinancial information, as discussed above. Rigor of Financial Audits and What Goes into Them The standard auditor’s report, whether prepared under US or international auditing standards, includes a paragraph that describes the auditor’s responsibility. This paragraph describes, among other things, the auditing standards used and that the audit has been planned and performed to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Also explained is that the auditor tested evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and assessed the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management. Finally, the auditor states that the audit provided a reasonable basis for our opinion. The Center for Audit Quality explains52 processes and practices for the performance of a financial statement audit. Audit procedures for financial statement audits that could be replicated to provide assurance on nonfinancial information include: 1. Inspection. The examination of records or documents, whether internal or external, in paper form, electronic or other media, or physically examining an asset. For example, inspecting a sample of invoices. 2. Observation. Observing a process or procedure being performed by company personnel or others. For example, observing a company’s physical inventory count, and re-performing counts on a test basis. 3. Inquiry. Seeking information from knowledgeable persons in financial or nonfinancial roles within the company or outside the company. 4. Confirmation. Obtaining information or representation of an existing condition directly from a knowledgeable third party. 11
  • 12. Effective Auditing for Corporates 5. Recalculation. Checking the mathematical accuracy of documents or records. 6. Analytical procedures. Comparison of recorded amounts, or ratios developed from recorded amounts, to expectations developed by the independent auditor. 7. Re-performance. The auditor’s independent execution of procedures or controls that originally were performed as part of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Integrating Standards and Assurance Methodologies for Financial and Nonfinancial Information The third challenge is to integrate accounting and auditing standards for financial and nonfinancial information in order to provide a “true and fair view of an organization’s sustainability.” Today, the “true and fair”53 view of a company’s financial statements—a concept that is more common outside of the United States, where the term “presents fairly”54 is used—asserts that the overall picture provided in the financial statements is more than simply a collection of “the right numbers” taken one at a time. There is a rebuttable presumption in both the “true and fair” view and “presents fairly” that the company is an ongoing concern for one year, unless stated otherwise. This perspective is a relatively short-term one which is focused solely on shareholders. Since integrated reporting is intended to give shareholders and other stakeholders information about the company’s ability to create value over the long term, an integrated assurance opinion needs to be a “true and fair” view of the company’s long-term sustainability, explicitly taking into account the extent to which the company is meeting the needs of other stakeholders in order to be able to continue creating value for its shareholders. Who Should Provide Integrated Assurance Opinions? Once these challenges are overcome, the question then becomes which organizations should issue integrated assurance opinions. We believe that accounting firms, especially the Big Four and others like BDO Seidman and Grant Thornton, which audit public companies, have a central role to play. They have the necessary global networks, established relationships with all public companies, and the skills and a long tradition of conducting rigorous audits. As a practical matter, at least in the short term, we do not see any other types of organization as interested in and able to perform this role. This could change over time as technology advances and other firms, such as software and IT services firms, develop the capabilities to perform continuous audits, albeit in a rather different way that will require major adaptations by auditing standard-setting bodies. But for the world’s major auditing firms to conduct integrated audits, two other challenges need to be faced. The first is building the necessary capabilities, and the second is liability reform. The accounting firms need to take responsibility for the former, but the latter is a question of public policy and the firms cannot resolve it on their own. Once an assurance opinion goes beyond financial information based on accounting standards to include information on environmental, social, and governance performance, a much broader range of capabilities becomes necessary. None of the major accounting firms have even close to the necessary capabilities, although some are working to develop them. 12
  • 13. Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance Practice Protection Costs According to the October 2008 final report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the US Department of the Treasury,55 the six international auditing firms paid approximately US$5.7 billion to bring 362 cases to closure during the period 1997–2009. Of that amount, about US$3.7 billion, or 65%, was related to the audits of public (listed) companies. Litigation and practice protection costs include all litigation-related costs—costs of outside counsel and other experts, settlements and judgments, internal litigation-related costs, and insurance premiums, less insurance recoveries. The amount is equal to 6.6% of these firms’ revenues and 15.1% of these firms’ audit- related revenues. Litigation is clearly of significant concern to the auditing firms but is also of concern to investors and other market stakeholders. The challenge, certainly from the perspective of the auditing firms, is that they are an easy target for litigation. Audit firms are often sued when a company suffers a sudden and dramatic drop in its stock price or when a company goes bankrupt. Other stakeholders question whether efforts to limit liability are in the interest of investors and the capital markets, believing that the firms can best protect themselves by performing high quality and informative audits in full compliance with US or international professional standards. Ultimately, the legal system must balance the needs of auditing firms and the public interest. The extent to which accounting firms have the incentives and resources to build these capabilities partially depends on their expected and actual liabilities in conducting integrated audits. Liability reform remains a hot topic in the auditing profession, especially in the litigious United States. The debate today centers on the audits of financial statements, especially when accounting problems are confounded with a company’s bankruptcy, or when major fraud, especially in top management, is detected. This debate needs to be extended to the liabilities that will emerge from giving as much prominence to nonfinancial information as to financial information. Legislators and regulators will have to address this topic in a reasoned and responsible way. Ultimately, laws and regulations must balance the need to punish incompetence and malfeasance while creating an environment that encourages the accounting firms to make the investments necessary to provide high-quality assurance on nonfinancial information. Summary and Further Steps We will conclude with five recommendations which address the above five challenges. Each of these recommendations requires the active engagement of the accounting profession, including those in auditing firms, corporations (such as those in the finance function and internal audit), and academia. Failure of the accounting profession to help address these challenges puts its long-term relevance at risk. More importantly, it also puts at risk the development of a sustainable society. 13
  • 14. Effective Auditing for Corporates 8 First, working with the agencies of the government that give authority to their efforts, accounting standard-setters, such as the FASB and the IASB, should initiate projects to determine how to develop an institutionally legitimate set of standards for nonfinancial information. These bodies have deep expertise in the standard- setting process, although their domain knowledge is exclusively in the financial realm. Working with organizations that have expertise in the nonfinancial realm, they can develop a set of standards for nonfinancial information that have the same credibility as do standards for financial information. We also suggest that greater use could be made of technology to speed the development process. Setting accounting standards is a notoriously slow process, taking years or even decades, and a greater sense of urgency is necessary if a sustainable society is to be created. 8 Second, auditing standard-setters, such as the PCAOB in the United States and the IFAC, through the IAASB, should initiate projects for developing auditing standards for nonfinancial information, with respect both to individual metrics and to the internal control and measurement systems that produce them. As with accounting standard-setters, they should leverage their expertise in standard-setting and extend it by collaborating with organizations that have relevant expertise in the nonfinancial domain, such as organizations that audit supply chains and adherence to principles of human rights. 8 Third, both accounting and auditing standard-setting bodies should collaborate on initiating a project to define the meaning of “a true and fair view of an organization’s sustainability.” This definition will inform how measurement and auditing standards for financial and nonfinancial information are forged, rather than spliced, together in order to produce a truly integrated assurance opinion—a true “integrated audit” that takes into account the relationship between financial and nonfinancial performance. This project will require substantial input from organizations that have the relevant expertise in standard-setting and the assurance of nonfinancial information. 8 Fourth, the major accounting firms should build the necessary capabilities to conduct an integrated audit. This will be done through a combination of hiring individuals with technical skills outside of accounting (such as in engineering and supply-chain management), acquisitions of firms that have such skills, and building alliances and partnerships with such firms. The first two approaches raise an important practical question which the accounting profession and the entities that regulate it should address: What are the roles and responsibilities of the nonaccountant professionals within the audit and assurance hierarchies of the firms? Failure to address this question will leave them forever as “second class citizens,” to the detriment of placing nonfinancial information on an equal footing with financial information. The third approach, in which the accounting firm would be functioning as a “general contractor,” raises issues of liability exposure and risk-sharing. As experience in the construction industry shows, this is a difficult question to resolve and no clean and simple solution exists. International Standards on Auditing56 (ISA) and US Generally Accepted Auditing Standards57 (GAAS) provide similar guidance to auditors who use the work of an expert or specialist in performing an audit. Both standards apply to the work of, for example, actuaries, appraisers, attorneys, engineers, environmental consultants, and geologists. Under international and US standards, the auditor is not permitted to refer to the work or findings of the specialist to avoid the risk that such a reference 14
  • 15. Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance might be misunderstood to be a qualification of the opinion or that any division of responsibility exists. Of course, it is conceptually possible to split the responsibilities for auditing the financial and nonfinancial information between two audit firms, or have a nonaccounting firm do the latter, or even have a nonaccounting firm issue the integrated audit with input from an accounting firm on the financial audit. At least in the short term, we don’t see any of these models as being practical due to regulations and the unlikelihood that investors would find a nonaccounting firm to be credible in issuing an integrated audit. 8 Fifth, the politically contentious issue of limiting the liability of accounting firms should be addressed. Opponents of this idea cite the substantial incomes earned by partners in the major accounting firms, point out that audit failures and the inability to detect fraud are still too common, and legitimately worry about the moral hazard problem if the risk of failure is shifted away from the firms. They may also point out that the substantial new revenue opportunities made possible by integrated audits should be enough of an incentive for auditing firms to do them. However, given the current concentration in the auditing industry,58 especially with respect to the world’s largest companies, the public risk of losing another large accounting firm due to litigation is simply too great. In the long term, this concentration is a public policy question that should be addressed, but in the short term we need to ensure that sufficient capacity exists to provide integrated assurance opinions for all listed companies. More Info Book: Eccles, Robert G., and Michael P. Krzus. One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010. Article: Eccles, Robert G., and Kyle Armbrester. “ Integrated reporting in the cloud: Two disruptive ideas combined.” IESE Insight 8 (First Quarter 2011): 13–20. Online at: tinyurl.com/7tkqojj Reports: Eccles, Robert G., Ioannis Ioannou, and George Serafeim. “The impact of a corporate culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance.” Working paper 12-035. Harvard Business School, November 4, 2011. Online at: www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/12-035.pdf Ioannou, Ioannis, and George Serafeim. “The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting.” Working paper 11-100. Harvard Business School, 2011. Online at: www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/11-100.pdf 15
  • 16. Effective Auditing for Corporates Websites: Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP): www.cdproject.net Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB): www.cdsb.net CorporateRegister database: www.corporateregister.com European Federation of Financial Analyst Societies (EFFAS): www.effas.net Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): www.globalreporting.org Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS): iris.thegiin.org International Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC): www.theiirc.org Notes 1. South African Institute of Chartered Accountants. “An integrated report is a new requirement for listed companies.” Press release. June 4, 2010. Online at: tinyurl.com/8845pl9 2. For a more complete discussion of the benefits to companies of integrated reporting, see Eccles and Krzus (2010), and Eccles and Armbrester (2011). 3. GRI reports list: tinyurl.com/7jmt2yw 4. Terminology regarding the reporting of nonfinancial information is inconsistent and confusing. Some people use the terms “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) and “sustainability” interchangeably, whereas for others they mean different things. Each term also has different meanings. For some companies, their CSR report is about philanthropic contributions and community activities. For others, it is about their ESG performance more broadly. Similarly, for some companies their sustainability report is solely about carbon emissions and other environmental concerns, while for others it is about ESG performance more broadly. We will use the term “sustainability report” to refer to the entire range of ESG performance information. For a discussion of the origins of the concepts of corporate social responsibility and sustainability see chapter 5 in Eccles and Krzus (2010). 5. CorporateRegister.com (see www.corporateregister.com/about.html). The database is available on a subscription-only basis. 6. GRI, op. cit. 3. 7. CorporateRegister.com, op. cit. 5. 8. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. “Auditing standard no. 5: An audit of internal control over financial reporting that is integrated with an audit of financial statements.” Online at: tinyurl.com/ye5sprj; para. 6–7. 9. The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, Section 2, Definitions (2), defines an “audit” as “an examination of the financial statements of any issuer [a publicly traded or listed company] by an independent public accounting firm in accordance with the rules of the Board [Public Company Accounting Oversight Board] or the Commission [the US Securities and Exchange Commission]…” 10. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. “International standard on auditing 200: Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing.” Online at: tinyurl.com/6oyvbat [PDF]. 11. The International Federation of Accountants develops international standards on ethics, auditing and assurance, education, and public sector accounting standards through its independent standard-setting boards, which include the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. See web.ifac.org/download/Facts_About_IFAC.pdf 12. See tinyurl.com/75eoxuw 13. See www.theiirc.org/the-iirc 14. See www.theiirc.org/about 15. See www.theiirc.org/the-iirc 16. Deloitte. “Integrated reporting: Is your message lost in regulation?” 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/7vdphmt [PDF]. 17. Ernst & Young. “Integrated report: Content outline.” 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/6wdssod [PDF]. 18. KPMG. “Integrated reporting: Closing the loop of strategy.” 2010. Online at: tinyurl.com/6m8swmq [PDF]. 19. PricewaterhouseCoopers. “Insight or fatigue? FTSE 350 reporting.” 2010. Online at: www.pwcwebcast.co.uk/cr_ftse350.pdf 20. The ACCA event can be accessed at tinyurl.com/6we2ndm 21. Eccles, Ioannou, and Serafeim (2011). 22. Ioannou and Serafeim (2011). 23. International Integrated Reporting Committee. “Towards integrated reporting: Communicating value in the 21st century.” September 12, 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/6k4y8w4; p. 3. 24. For discussions of the role of the Internet in integrated reporting, see chapter 7, “The Internet and integrated reporting,” in Eccles and Krzus (2010), and Eccles and Armbrester (2011). 16
  • 17. Integrated Reporting Requires Integrated Assurance 25. See tinyurl.com/88w5tvv [PDF]. 26. Philips Annual Report 2010: www.annualreport2010.philips.com/downloads/. See Section 14.5, page 206, for the KPMG independent auditor’s report on the 2010 Philips financial statements, and Section 15.7, page 221, for the KPMG independent assurance report on the 2010 Philips sustainability statements. 27. Novo Nordisk Annual Report 2010: tinyurl.com/87vmptm. See page 110 for the PricewaterhouseCoopers independent auditor’s report on the 2010 Novo Nordisk financial statements and page 111 for the PricewaterhouseCoopers independent assurance report on the 2010 Novo Nordisk nonfinancial information. 28. KPMG. “KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011.” November 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/7z46ne8 [PDF]. 29. Deloitte IAS Plus. “Summaries of international financial reporting standards … Conceptual framework for financial reporting 2010.” September 2010. Online at: www.iasplus.com/standard/framewk.htm. Note: International Financial Reporting Standards are only available through a subscription service. 30. Financial Accounting Standards Board. “Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 8: Conceptual framework for financial reporting.” September 2010. Online at: tinyurl.com/86c5dr9; para. QC11. 31. TSC Industries v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 449 (1976). See also Basic, Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). 32. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. “International standard on auditing 320: Materiality in planning and performing an audit.” Online at: tinyurl.com/7mekuor [PDF]; para. 4. 33. TSC v. Northway, op. cit. 29. 34. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. “AT section 101: Attest engagements.” Online at: pcaobus.org/Standards/Attestation/Pages/AT101.aspx; para. 67. 35. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. “International standard on assurance engagements 3000: Assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information.” Online at: tinyurl.com/7h2fez7 [PDF]; para. 23. 36. CorporateRegister.com, op. cit. 5. 37. Banco Bradesco. “2009 sustainability report.” Online at: tinyurl.com/75yj2ug [PDF]; p. 65. Bradesco is one of Brazil’s largest private banks (not controlled by government) in terms of total assets. 38. BASF is the world’s leading chemical company. BASF employed about 110,000 people and had approximately 385 production sites worldwide. See tinyurl.com/7xd3s3q 39. L’Oréal is the world’s leading cosmetics group. Based in France, the company employed 66,600 people in 130 countries. See tinyurl.com/8ydjhtp 40. Petrobras was a publicly traded corporation and its the majority stockholder was the government of Brazil. It ranked as the third-largest energy company in the world with a presence in 28 countries. See tinyurl.com/7clh779 41. SolarWorld was one of the world’s largest solar energy businesses with more than 3,600 employees at production facilities in Germany and the United States. See tinyurl.com/7qlc8dp 42. State Street Corporation was founded in 1972. The company was a global leader in financial services and provided a wide range of products and services for large pools of investment assets. See tinyurl.com/75ga2tb [PDF]; p. 5. 43. Climate Disclosure Standards Board. “Climate change reporting framework.” Edition 1.0. September 2010. 44. Society of Investment Professionals in Germany. “KPIs for ESG: A guideline for the integration of ESG into financial analysis and corporate valuation.” Version 3.0. 2010. Online at: tinyurl.com/6z2msgz [PDF]. 45. GRI G4 developments: tinyurl.com/bvf7rsp 46. GRI G4 first public comment period—survey: tinyurl.com/5t6gmyo 47. International Organization for Standardization. “ISO 14000 essentials.” Online at: www.iso.org/iso/iso_14000_essentials 48. International Organization for Standardization. “ISO 2600 social responsibility.” Online at: www.iso.org/iso/social_responsibility 49. Impact Reporting and Investment Standards. “IRIS standards.” Online at: iris.thegiin.org/iris-standards 50. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. “Guidelines for reporting by multinational enterprises.” 2008. Online at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/56/36/1922428.pdf 51. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. “Guidance on corporate responsibility indicators in annual reports.” 2008. Online at: www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteteb20076_en.pdf 52. Center for Audit Quality. “In-depth guide to public company auditing: The financial statement audit.” May 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/6lunkeu [PDF]. 53. Financial Reporting Council. “True and fair.” July 2011. Online at: tinyurl.com/75trdvx [PDF]. Also: Moore, Martin. “The true and fair requirement revisited: Opinion.” April 21, 2008. Online at: tinyurl.com/5qpfen [PDF]. 54. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. “AU section 411: The meaning of present fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.” Online at: pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AU411.aspx 55. Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession. “Final report.” October 6, 2008. Online at: tinyurl.com/6myfvw5 [PDF]. 56. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. “International standard on auditing 620: Using the work of a auditor’s expert.” Online at: tinyurl.com/7fqgrto [PDF]. 57. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. “AU section 336: Using the work of a specialist.” Online at: pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AU336.aspx 58. Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession, op. cit. 55, section V, pp. 5–6. 17
  • 18. 18