Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Law on the books v law in action w links
1. I am GradyWatts I teach Criminology,
Philosophy, and Humanities for LSC-Cyfair and
University Park. I also teach for Argosy
University, Brescia University and Lamar
University.
I have a Master of Science in Criminology and a
Master of Arts in Philosophy, two years of law
school and 18 hours toward my Ph.D
My Professional background is in Philosophy of
law, Legal Ethics, and Criminal Justice ethics
I love the ALL community! (And, Sarah
obviously).
2. MyThesis
The principles of U.S. Justice System are flawless, but the
application of Justice in the U.S. is terribly flawed, but it is
still the best Justice System in the world.
▪ This is almost a plagiarism ofWinstonChurchill’s view of the U.S.
constitution.
https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&client=firefox-
a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-
US%3Aofficial&channel=np&q=winston+churchill%27s+view+of+democracy&oq
=winston+churchill+view+of+&gs_l=serp.1.1.0j0i22i30l3.171086.181726.0.186176
.36.24.0.7.7.3.156.2244.15j8.23.0.eshsj%2Cj%3Dbottom%2Cjnum%3D2%2Cjlen%
3D3%2Cjprob%3D-14...0...1c.1.25.serp-shj..10.26.1886.pWUnw2NNboM
Currently we have more of our citizens in jail than any
other time in our history, by percentage. Close to 1 in 100
citizens or 2.26 million.
3. Law on the books – legal foundations
ought
Law in action – applied law
is
4. As a result of the unjust laws in England, the
bill of rights in U.S. Constitution was intended
to avoid past abuses of power.
But have we come full circle?
5. Federalist number 84
Hamilton when considering the bill of rights
“For why declare that things shall not be done
which there is no power to do?Why for instance,
should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall
not be restrained, when no power is given by
which restrictions may be imposed?”
6.
7. Law on the books (theory)
Allow Nine guilty to go free before we put one
innocent person in jail.
8. Prosecution success rate
90-95% pre-trial plea bargaining
90% conviction rate in trial
100 people charged
if 90 plead guilty, of the 10 that went to trial, 1 would
win.
Of those that win an appeal (less than 10%) and
have their case remanded, 90% are still
convicted on retrial.
9. Law in action
99% of those arrested are found guilty
10. Law on the books
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Law in action
The person that represents their-self has a fool for
a client.
11.
12.
13. Innocent until proven guilty?
“defendants who are alleged to have committed
serious crimes; judges set a very high bail because
they do not want these defendants wandering the
streets before trial.” (America’s Courts and the Criminal Justice System,
DavidW. Neubauer and Henry F. Fradella, 11th edition page 13)
14. • Law on the books
• Objective
• Applies to all
• Idealistic
• Presumption of
innocence
• Law in action
• Subjective
• Human factors
• Discretion
• Utility
• Plea bargaining
15. Law on the books
A speedy trial is in the public interest
Law in action
Each case, based on the court and crime, has a
price and proper time of disposition
16. Law on the books
Prosecutors work for the good of the community,
and they work to punish the guilty.
Prosecutors should use discretion to protect the
innocent from being tried.
Innocent until proven guilty
17.
18. Mike Nifong
“Just because there is no DNA evidence does not
mean that a crime did not occur”
Scary, considering it was a rape case!
https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&client=firefox-
a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-
US%3Aofficial&channel=np&q=mike+nifong&oq=mike+ni&gs_l=s
erp.1.0.0i20j0l2j0i20j0l6.93159.96932.0.99661.25.14.0.0.0.5.160.13
02.8j5.13.0.eshsj%2Cj%3Dbottom%2Cjnum%3D2%2Cjlen%3D3%
2Cjprob%3D-14...0...1c.1.25.serp-shj..18.7.722.IGMauOxeOxg
19.
20. North Carolina Duke Lacrosse vs Crystal Mangum
https://www.google.com/search?q=youtube%20arrested%20crystal%20mangu
m&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-
a&channel=np&source=hp
21. Thompson was on death row for 14 years
Prosecutor withheld evidence that might have led
to Thompson’s acquittal.
Connick admitted on his death bed that he had
withheld evidence.
https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&client=firefox-
a&hs=ruo&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-
US%3Aofficial&channel=np&q=connick+v.+thompson&oq=connic
k+v&gs_l=serp.1.1.0l9.234047.259677.0.263151.39.20.0.0.0.9.166.1
788.15j4.19.0.eshsj%2Cj%3Dbottom%2Cjnum%3D2%2Cjlen%3D3
%2Cjprob%3D-14...0...1c.1.25.serp-shj..30.9.860.cCKG0l_1Yho
22. Is it possible to bridge the gap between our
principles of justice and our legal practices?
Does the feeling of retributivism make the
endeavor impossible?
Which version of justice is justice?