SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
1
Key Benefits and Features of the ICAV
General Introduction and Background
The Irish Collective Asset-management Vehicle (“ICAV”), Ireland’s newest investment fund vehicle, was introduced in March 2015. The
Irish Collective Asset-management Vehicle Act 2015 (the “ICAV Act”) is the culmination of a joint government and industry project to
make available to promoters a legal framework for a corporate fund vehicle that is specifically designed for investment funds. Matheson
partners were extensively involved in the industry project to introduce the ICAV, the introduction of which increases the range of
available fund vehicles in Ireland, satisfying both promoter and investor appetite, and reflecting a practical balance between
organisational and operational flexibility on the one hand and investor protection on the other.
What is an ICAV?
The ICAV is a new corporate vehicle designed for Irish investment funds. It sits alongside the investment company, which has been the
most successful and popular of the existing Irish collective investment fund vehicles to date. An ICAV must be registered and
authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland (the “Central Bank”) and the new structure provides a tailor-made corporate fund vehicle for
both UCITS and alternative investment funds (“AIFs”).
Key Benefits of the ICAV
The ICAV legislation modernises the corporate fund structure and is conceived specifically with the needs of investment funds in mind.
As a bespoke corporate investment fund vehicle, a fund established as an ICAV has the advantage that it is not impacted by
amendments to certain pieces of European and domestic company legislation that are targeted at trading companies rather than
investment funds.
An important feature of the ICAV is that it is able to elect its classification under the US check-the-box taxation rules. The Irish
investment company is not permitted to check-the-box for US federal tax purposes. The ability of an investment fund, such as the
ICAV, to check-the-box can be helpful to US investors in investment funds, as it allows them to be subject to US tax as if they held the
underlying assets in the fund directly. For fund promoters wishing to market European funds to US investors and having a preference
for doing so through a corporate vehicle, the availability of the ICAV represents a significant development.
Features of the ICAV
The main features of the ICAV are set out below.
 An ICAV does not have the status of an ordinary Irish company established under the Irish Companies Acts. Instead, it has its
own legislative regime to ensure that the ICAV is distinguished from ordinary companies and therefore not subject to those
aspects of company law legislation which are not relevant or appropriate to a collective investment scheme.
 The Central Bank is both the registration and the supervisory authority for the ICAV. Registration is a straightforward process,
and is the same for all ICAVs, irrespective of the intended nature of the authorised ICAV as a UCITS or an AIF. The authorisation
process will depend on whether the ICAV is to be regulated as a UCITS or AIF. The authorisation process is no different than for
any other fund structure.
 An ICAV may be established as an umbrella structure with a number of sub-funds and share classes.
 Investors own shares in the ICAV and the ICAV is able to issue and redeem shares continually according to investor demand. In
this regard, there is no difference between the ICAV and other open-ended collective investment schemes, although it is also
permissible to establish ICAVs as closed ended schemes, subject to Central Bank requirements relating to closed-ended funds.
 The ICAV have a governing document known as an instrument of incorporation (“IOI”). Similar to the memorandum and articles of
association of an investment company, the IOI is the constitutional document of the ICAV. The primary reason for differentiating
between the memorandum and articles of association and an IOI is to emphasise the distinction between the ICAV and existing
investment companies as different types of corporate entity.
2
 In the case of changes to the IOI, the ICAV Act provides that prior approval of the members will not be required in order to amend
the IOI where the depositary certifies in writing that the relevant changes do not prejudice the interests of the members of the
ICAV and the Central Bank has not otherwise mandated that the change is of a type that must be approved by the members.
 Like an investment company, an ICAV must have a board of directors to govern its affairs, with a requirement for a minimum of
two directors.
 Similar to other collective investment schemes, the ICAV may either be managed by an external management company or be a
self-managed entity.
 Similar depositary requirements to those that exist for an investment company apply to an ICAV (which will vary depending on
whether the ICAV is a UCITS or AIF).
 The board of directors of an ICAV is permitted to elect to dispense with the holding of an annual general meeting by giving written
notice to all of the ICAV’s shareholders. The auditor of the ICAV or shareholders representing 10% of the voting rights may
require that an AGM be held in any one year.
 In an important innovation, it is possible to prepare accounts per sub-fund. This ensures that investors in a single sub-fund of an
umbrella with multiple sub-funds only receive information that is relevant to them and will reduce the costs and time spent by
managers in compiling accounts to be provided to shareholders.
 An ICAV is not required to spread risk, unlike an investment company, which is required to do so under the Companies Act.
 An ICAV may be listed on a stock exchange.
Existing funds established as investment companies have the option to convert to ICAV status. The ICAV legislation also provides for
ICAV mergers and for the migration of funds domiciled outside of Ireland into Ireland as ICAVs by continuation. Each of these
processes is straightforward and based on existing tried and tested procedures. Please see our ICAV briefing notes describing these
processes available at www.matheson.com.
Comment
The introduction of the ICAV demonstrates Ireland’s pro-active approach in meeting the evolving needs of fund promoters, and its
competitiveness as a leading international fund domicile. The ICAV provides an additional option for promoters, complementing the
existing range of available Irish fund vehicles. The ICAV legislation does not result in any changes for established investment
companies, which continue to co-exist with the ICAV. However, it is anticipated that the ICAV will become the vehicle of choice for
UCITS and AIFs in Europe.
If you require detailed advice relating to the ICAV, please get in touch with your usual Asset Management and Investment Funds Group
contact who would be delighted to assist you.
Full details of the Asset Management and Investment Funds Group, together with further updates, articles and briefing notes written by
members of the Asset Management and Investment Funds team can be accessed at www.matheson.com.
Tara Doyle
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2221
E: tara.doyle@matheson.com
Michael Jackson
MANAGING PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2000
E: michael.jackson@matheson.com
Dualta Counihan
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2451
E: dualta.counihan@matheson.com
Joe Beashel
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2101
E: joe.beashel@matheson.com
Anne-Marie Bohan
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2212
E: anne-marie.bohan@matheson.com
Shay Lydon
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2735
E: shay.lydon@matheson.com
Liam Collins
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2195
E: liam.collins@matheson.com
Philip Lovegrove
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2538
E: philip.lovegrove@matheson.com
Elizabeth Grace
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2104
E: elizabeth.grace@matheson.com
Oisin McClenaghan
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2227
E:oisin.mcclenaghan@matheson.com
Michelle Ridge
PARTNER
D: +353 1 232 2758
E: michelle.ridge@matheson.com
Matheson Publication April 2016
The material is provided for general information purposes only and does not purport to cover every aspect of the themes and subject matter discussed,
nor is it intended to provide, and does not constitute, legal or any other advice on any particular matter. The information in this document is provided
subject to the Legal Terms and Liability Disclaimer contained on the Matheson website. Copyright © Matheson.

More Related Content

More from Matheson Law Firm

The Transfer Pricing Law Review 4th edition
The Transfer Pricing Law Review 4th editionThe Transfer Pricing Law Review 4th edition
The Transfer Pricing Law Review 4th editionMatheson Law Firm
 
The Law Reviews Employment Law Review 2020
The Law Reviews Employment Law Review 2020The Law Reviews Employment Law Review 2020
The Law Reviews Employment Law Review 2020Matheson Law Firm
 
Lexology Getting the Deal Through Air Transport 2020
Lexology Getting the Deal Through Air Transport 2020Lexology Getting the Deal Through Air Transport 2020
Lexology Getting the Deal Through Air Transport 2020Matheson Law Firm
 
ICLG Mergers and Acquisitions 2020
ICLG Mergers and Acquisitions 2020ICLG Mergers and Acquisitions 2020
ICLG Mergers and Acquisitions 2020Matheson Law Firm
 
Cape Town Convention Journal
Cape Town Convention JournalCape Town Convention Journal
Cape Town Convention JournalMatheson Law Firm
 
Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing Forum
Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing ForumBloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing Forum
Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing ForumMatheson Law Firm
 
Getting the Deal Through: Fintech 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Fintech 2020Getting the Deal Through: Fintech 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Fintech 2020Matheson Law Firm
 
International Comparative Legal Guide to Private Equity 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Private Equity 2019International Comparative Legal Guide to Private Equity 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Private Equity 2019Matheson Law Firm
 
Class Actions Law Review, 3rd Edition
Class Actions Law Review, 3rd EditionClass Actions Law Review, 3rd Edition
Class Actions Law Review, 3rd EditionMatheson Law Firm
 
The Insolvency Review, 7th Edition
The Insolvency Review, 7th EditionThe Insolvency Review, 7th Edition
The Insolvency Review, 7th EditionMatheson Law Firm
 
International Comparative Legal Guide to Business Crime 2020
International Comparative Legal Guide to Business Crime 2020International Comparative Legal Guide to Business Crime 2020
International Comparative Legal Guide to Business Crime 2020Matheson Law Firm
 
International Comparative Legal Guide to Data Protection 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Data Protection 2019International Comparative Legal Guide to Data Protection 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Data Protection 2019Matheson Law Firm
 
International Comparative Legal Guide to Mergers & Acquisitions 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Mergers & Acquisitions 2019International Comparative Legal Guide to Mergers & Acquisitions 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Mergers & Acquisitions 2019Matheson Law Firm
 
Getting the Deal Through: Transfer Pricing
Getting the Deal Through: Transfer PricingGetting the Deal Through: Transfer Pricing
Getting the Deal Through: Transfer PricingMatheson Law Firm
 
Getting the Deal Through: Air Transport 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Air Transport 2020Getting the Deal Through: Air Transport 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Air Transport 2020Matheson Law Firm
 
Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy 2020Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy 2020Matheson Law Firm
 
Getting the Deal Through: Insurance Litigation 2019
Getting the Deal Through: Insurance Litigation 2019Getting the Deal Through: Insurance Litigation 2019
Getting the Deal Through: Insurance Litigation 2019Matheson Law Firm
 
The Law Reviews: Transfer Pricing, Third Edition
The Law Reviews: Transfer Pricing, Third EditionThe Law Reviews: Transfer Pricing, Third Edition
The Law Reviews: Transfer Pricing, Third EditionMatheson Law Firm
 

More from Matheson Law Firm (20)

The Transfer Pricing Law Review 4th edition
The Transfer Pricing Law Review 4th editionThe Transfer Pricing Law Review 4th edition
The Transfer Pricing Law Review 4th edition
 
The Law Reviews Employment Law Review 2020
The Law Reviews Employment Law Review 2020The Law Reviews Employment Law Review 2020
The Law Reviews Employment Law Review 2020
 
Lexology Getting the Deal Through Air Transport 2020
Lexology Getting the Deal Through Air Transport 2020Lexology Getting the Deal Through Air Transport 2020
Lexology Getting the Deal Through Air Transport 2020
 
ICLG Mergers and Acquisitions 2020
ICLG Mergers and Acquisitions 2020ICLG Mergers and Acquisitions 2020
ICLG Mergers and Acquisitions 2020
 
Cape Town Convention Journal
Cape Town Convention JournalCape Town Convention Journal
Cape Town Convention Journal
 
Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing Forum
Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing ForumBloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing Forum
Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing Forum
 
ICLG Private Client 2020
ICLG Private Client 2020ICLG Private Client 2020
ICLG Private Client 2020
 
Getting the Deal Through: Fintech 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Fintech 2020Getting the Deal Through: Fintech 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Fintech 2020
 
International Comparative Legal Guide to Private Equity 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Private Equity 2019International Comparative Legal Guide to Private Equity 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Private Equity 2019
 
Healthcare Law Review
Healthcare Law ReviewHealthcare Law Review
Healthcare Law Review
 
Class Actions Law Review, 3rd Edition
Class Actions Law Review, 3rd EditionClass Actions Law Review, 3rd Edition
Class Actions Law Review, 3rd Edition
 
The Insolvency Review, 7th Edition
The Insolvency Review, 7th EditionThe Insolvency Review, 7th Edition
The Insolvency Review, 7th Edition
 
International Comparative Legal Guide to Business Crime 2020
International Comparative Legal Guide to Business Crime 2020International Comparative Legal Guide to Business Crime 2020
International Comparative Legal Guide to Business Crime 2020
 
International Comparative Legal Guide to Data Protection 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Data Protection 2019International Comparative Legal Guide to Data Protection 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Data Protection 2019
 
International Comparative Legal Guide to Mergers & Acquisitions 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Mergers & Acquisitions 2019International Comparative Legal Guide to Mergers & Acquisitions 2019
International Comparative Legal Guide to Mergers & Acquisitions 2019
 
Getting the Deal Through: Transfer Pricing
Getting the Deal Through: Transfer PricingGetting the Deal Through: Transfer Pricing
Getting the Deal Through: Transfer Pricing
 
Getting the Deal Through: Air Transport 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Air Transport 2020Getting the Deal Through: Air Transport 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Air Transport 2020
 
Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy 2020Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy 2020
Getting the Deal Through: Tax Controversy 2020
 
Getting the Deal Through: Insurance Litigation 2019
Getting the Deal Through: Insurance Litigation 2019Getting the Deal Through: Insurance Litigation 2019
Getting the Deal Through: Insurance Litigation 2019
 
The Law Reviews: Transfer Pricing, Third Edition
The Law Reviews: Transfer Pricing, Third EditionThe Law Reviews: Transfer Pricing, Third Edition
The Law Reviews: Transfer Pricing, Third Edition
 

Recently uploaded

Good Governance Practices for protection of Human Rights (Discuss Transparen...
Good Governance Practices for protection  of Human Rights (Discuss Transparen...Good Governance Practices for protection  of Human Rights (Discuss Transparen...
Good Governance Practices for protection of Human Rights (Discuss Transparen...shubhuc963
 
Difference between LLP, Partnership, and Company
Difference between LLP, Partnership, and CompanyDifference between LLP, Partnership, and Company
Difference between LLP, Partnership, and Companyaneesashraf6
 
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一jr6r07mb
 
Rights of under-trial Prisoners in India
Rights of under-trial Prisoners in IndiaRights of under-trial Prisoners in India
Rights of under-trial Prisoners in IndiaAbheet Mangleek
 
Role and Responsibilities of Mediator and Approach
Role and Responsibilities of Mediator and ApproachRole and Responsibilities of Mediator and Approach
Role and Responsibilities of Mediator and Approach2020000445musaib
 
The Prevention Of Corruption Act Presentation.pptx
The Prevention Of Corruption Act Presentation.pptxThe Prevention Of Corruption Act Presentation.pptx
The Prevention Of Corruption Act Presentation.pptxNeeteshKumar71
 
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书SD DS
 
SecuritiesContracts(Regulation)Act,1956.pdf
SecuritiesContracts(Regulation)Act,1956.pdfSecuritiesContracts(Regulation)Act,1956.pdf
SecuritiesContracts(Regulation)Act,1956.pdfDrNiteshSaraswat
 
Sports Writing for PISAYyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.pptx
Sports Writing for PISAYyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.pptxSports Writing for PISAYyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.pptx
Sports Writing for PISAYyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.pptxmarielouisetulaytay
 
如何办理(Curtin毕业证书)科廷科技大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Curtin毕业证书)科廷科技大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(Curtin毕业证书)科廷科技大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Curtin毕业证书)科廷科技大学毕业证学位证书SD DS
 
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书SD DS
 
如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
 如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书 如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书Fir sss
 
Comparison of GenAI benchmarking models for legal use cases
Comparison of GenAI benchmarking models for legal use casesComparison of GenAI benchmarking models for legal use cases
Comparison of GenAI benchmarking models for legal use casesritwikv20
 
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 ShopsVanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 ShopsAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...Dr. Oliver Massmann
 
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝soniya singh
 
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一st Las
 
Group 2 Marlaw Definition of Bill of Lading .pptx
Group 2 Marlaw Definition of Bill of Lading .pptxGroup 2 Marlaw Definition of Bill of Lading .pptx
Group 2 Marlaw Definition of Bill of Lading .pptxjohnpazperpetua10
 
如何办理(Rice毕业证书)莱斯大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Rice毕业证书)莱斯大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(Rice毕业证书)莱斯大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Rice毕业证书)莱斯大学毕业证学位证书SD DS
 
如何办理(GWU毕业证书)乔治华盛顿大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(GWU毕业证书)乔治华盛顿大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(GWU毕业证书)乔治华盛顿大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(GWU毕业证书)乔治华盛顿大学毕业证学位证书SD DS
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Good Governance Practices for protection of Human Rights (Discuss Transparen...
Good Governance Practices for protection  of Human Rights (Discuss Transparen...Good Governance Practices for protection  of Human Rights (Discuss Transparen...
Good Governance Practices for protection of Human Rights (Discuss Transparen...
 
Difference between LLP, Partnership, and Company
Difference between LLP, Partnership, and CompanyDifference between LLP, Partnership, and Company
Difference between LLP, Partnership, and Company
 
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
Rights of under-trial Prisoners in India
Rights of under-trial Prisoners in IndiaRights of under-trial Prisoners in India
Rights of under-trial Prisoners in India
 
Role and Responsibilities of Mediator and Approach
Role and Responsibilities of Mediator and ApproachRole and Responsibilities of Mediator and Approach
Role and Responsibilities of Mediator and Approach
 
The Prevention Of Corruption Act Presentation.pptx
The Prevention Of Corruption Act Presentation.pptxThe Prevention Of Corruption Act Presentation.pptx
The Prevention Of Corruption Act Presentation.pptx
 
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
 
SecuritiesContracts(Regulation)Act,1956.pdf
SecuritiesContracts(Regulation)Act,1956.pdfSecuritiesContracts(Regulation)Act,1956.pdf
SecuritiesContracts(Regulation)Act,1956.pdf
 
Sports Writing for PISAYyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.pptx
Sports Writing for PISAYyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.pptxSports Writing for PISAYyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.pptx
Sports Writing for PISAYyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.pptx
 
如何办理(Curtin毕业证书)科廷科技大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Curtin毕业证书)科廷科技大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(Curtin毕业证书)科廷科技大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Curtin毕业证书)科廷科技大学毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
 如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书 如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理佛蒙特大学毕业证学位证书
 
Comparison of GenAI benchmarking models for legal use cases
Comparison of GenAI benchmarking models for legal use casesComparison of GenAI benchmarking models for legal use cases
Comparison of GenAI benchmarking models for legal use cases
 
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 ShopsVanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
 
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
 
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
 
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
Group 2 Marlaw Definition of Bill of Lading .pptx
Group 2 Marlaw Definition of Bill of Lading .pptxGroup 2 Marlaw Definition of Bill of Lading .pptx
Group 2 Marlaw Definition of Bill of Lading .pptx
 
如何办理(Rice毕业证书)莱斯大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Rice毕业证书)莱斯大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(Rice毕业证书)莱斯大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Rice毕业证书)莱斯大学毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理(GWU毕业证书)乔治华盛顿大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(GWU毕业证书)乔治华盛顿大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(GWU毕业证书)乔治华盛顿大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(GWU毕业证书)乔治华盛顿大学毕业证学位证书
 

Key Benefits and Features of the ICAV

  • 1. 1 Key Benefits and Features of the ICAV General Introduction and Background The Irish Collective Asset-management Vehicle (“ICAV”), Ireland’s newest investment fund vehicle, was introduced in March 2015. The Irish Collective Asset-management Vehicle Act 2015 (the “ICAV Act”) is the culmination of a joint government and industry project to make available to promoters a legal framework for a corporate fund vehicle that is specifically designed for investment funds. Matheson partners were extensively involved in the industry project to introduce the ICAV, the introduction of which increases the range of available fund vehicles in Ireland, satisfying both promoter and investor appetite, and reflecting a practical balance between organisational and operational flexibility on the one hand and investor protection on the other. What is an ICAV? The ICAV is a new corporate vehicle designed for Irish investment funds. It sits alongside the investment company, which has been the most successful and popular of the existing Irish collective investment fund vehicles to date. An ICAV must be registered and authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland (the “Central Bank”) and the new structure provides a tailor-made corporate fund vehicle for both UCITS and alternative investment funds (“AIFs”). Key Benefits of the ICAV The ICAV legislation modernises the corporate fund structure and is conceived specifically with the needs of investment funds in mind. As a bespoke corporate investment fund vehicle, a fund established as an ICAV has the advantage that it is not impacted by amendments to certain pieces of European and domestic company legislation that are targeted at trading companies rather than investment funds. An important feature of the ICAV is that it is able to elect its classification under the US check-the-box taxation rules. The Irish investment company is not permitted to check-the-box for US federal tax purposes. The ability of an investment fund, such as the ICAV, to check-the-box can be helpful to US investors in investment funds, as it allows them to be subject to US tax as if they held the underlying assets in the fund directly. For fund promoters wishing to market European funds to US investors and having a preference for doing so through a corporate vehicle, the availability of the ICAV represents a significant development. Features of the ICAV The main features of the ICAV are set out below.  An ICAV does not have the status of an ordinary Irish company established under the Irish Companies Acts. Instead, it has its own legislative regime to ensure that the ICAV is distinguished from ordinary companies and therefore not subject to those aspects of company law legislation which are not relevant or appropriate to a collective investment scheme.  The Central Bank is both the registration and the supervisory authority for the ICAV. Registration is a straightforward process, and is the same for all ICAVs, irrespective of the intended nature of the authorised ICAV as a UCITS or an AIF. The authorisation process will depend on whether the ICAV is to be regulated as a UCITS or AIF. The authorisation process is no different than for any other fund structure.  An ICAV may be established as an umbrella structure with a number of sub-funds and share classes.  Investors own shares in the ICAV and the ICAV is able to issue and redeem shares continually according to investor demand. In this regard, there is no difference between the ICAV and other open-ended collective investment schemes, although it is also permissible to establish ICAVs as closed ended schemes, subject to Central Bank requirements relating to closed-ended funds.  The ICAV have a governing document known as an instrument of incorporation (“IOI”). Similar to the memorandum and articles of association of an investment company, the IOI is the constitutional document of the ICAV. The primary reason for differentiating between the memorandum and articles of association and an IOI is to emphasise the distinction between the ICAV and existing investment companies as different types of corporate entity.
  • 2. 2  In the case of changes to the IOI, the ICAV Act provides that prior approval of the members will not be required in order to amend the IOI where the depositary certifies in writing that the relevant changes do not prejudice the interests of the members of the ICAV and the Central Bank has not otherwise mandated that the change is of a type that must be approved by the members.  Like an investment company, an ICAV must have a board of directors to govern its affairs, with a requirement for a minimum of two directors.  Similar to other collective investment schemes, the ICAV may either be managed by an external management company or be a self-managed entity.  Similar depositary requirements to those that exist for an investment company apply to an ICAV (which will vary depending on whether the ICAV is a UCITS or AIF).  The board of directors of an ICAV is permitted to elect to dispense with the holding of an annual general meeting by giving written notice to all of the ICAV’s shareholders. The auditor of the ICAV or shareholders representing 10% of the voting rights may require that an AGM be held in any one year.  In an important innovation, it is possible to prepare accounts per sub-fund. This ensures that investors in a single sub-fund of an umbrella with multiple sub-funds only receive information that is relevant to them and will reduce the costs and time spent by managers in compiling accounts to be provided to shareholders.  An ICAV is not required to spread risk, unlike an investment company, which is required to do so under the Companies Act.  An ICAV may be listed on a stock exchange. Existing funds established as investment companies have the option to convert to ICAV status. The ICAV legislation also provides for ICAV mergers and for the migration of funds domiciled outside of Ireland into Ireland as ICAVs by continuation. Each of these processes is straightforward and based on existing tried and tested procedures. Please see our ICAV briefing notes describing these processes available at www.matheson.com. Comment The introduction of the ICAV demonstrates Ireland’s pro-active approach in meeting the evolving needs of fund promoters, and its competitiveness as a leading international fund domicile. The ICAV provides an additional option for promoters, complementing the existing range of available Irish fund vehicles. The ICAV legislation does not result in any changes for established investment companies, which continue to co-exist with the ICAV. However, it is anticipated that the ICAV will become the vehicle of choice for UCITS and AIFs in Europe. If you require detailed advice relating to the ICAV, please get in touch with your usual Asset Management and Investment Funds Group contact who would be delighted to assist you. Full details of the Asset Management and Investment Funds Group, together with further updates, articles and briefing notes written by members of the Asset Management and Investment Funds team can be accessed at www.matheson.com. Tara Doyle PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2221 E: tara.doyle@matheson.com Michael Jackson MANAGING PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2000 E: michael.jackson@matheson.com Dualta Counihan PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2451 E: dualta.counihan@matheson.com Joe Beashel PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2101 E: joe.beashel@matheson.com Anne-Marie Bohan PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2212 E: anne-marie.bohan@matheson.com Shay Lydon PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2735 E: shay.lydon@matheson.com Liam Collins PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2195 E: liam.collins@matheson.com Philip Lovegrove PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2538 E: philip.lovegrove@matheson.com Elizabeth Grace PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2104 E: elizabeth.grace@matheson.com Oisin McClenaghan PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2227 E:oisin.mcclenaghan@matheson.com Michelle Ridge PARTNER D: +353 1 232 2758 E: michelle.ridge@matheson.com Matheson Publication April 2016 The material is provided for general information purposes only and does not purport to cover every aspect of the themes and subject matter discussed, nor is it intended to provide, and does not constitute, legal or any other advice on any particular matter. The information in this document is provided subject to the Legal Terms and Liability Disclaimer contained on the Matheson website. Copyright © Matheson.