David Luna de Grupo Editorial Expansión comparte su experiencia como Fellow en Stanford estudiando "Innovation Journalism"

1. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

2. Innovación
David Luna
Editor General
Revista
Grupo Editorial Expansión
A Time Inc Company
dluna@expansion.com.mx
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

3. Innovación
David Luna
Editor General
Revista MANU
FACTURA
Grupo Editorial Expansión
A Time Inc Company
dluna@expansion.com.mx
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

4. Innovación
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

5. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

6. Definir la innovación
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

7. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

8. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

9. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

10. “Si queremos entender la creatividad necesitamos
entender los procesos de selección. ¿Cómo podemos
mejorar la creatividad mejorando la manera en que
seleccionamos e implementamos nuevas ideas?”
— Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

11. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

12. Estructura
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

13. Estructura
Desarrollo de un sistema
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

14. Estructura
Desarrollo de un sistema
Mediano y largo plazo
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

15. Estructura
Desarrollo de un sistema
Mediano y largo plazo
Resultado de un proceso
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

16. Estructura
Desarrollo de un sistema
Mediano y largo plazo
Resultado de un proceso
Beneficio económico
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

17. Estructura
Desarrollo de un sistema
Mediano y largo plazo
Resultado de un proceso
Beneficio económico
Oferta de valor
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

18. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

19. Se transforma el conocimiento
en un beneficio ( valor asociado )
Mejoras o cambios científicos y
tecnológicos
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

20. Herramientas
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

21. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

22. Planeación Estratégica
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

23. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

24. Planeación de Escenarios
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

25. Planeación de Escenarios
✴Fuerzas
✴Incertidumbres
✴Escenarios
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

26. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

27. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

28. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

29. the 4 main areas of a business model
6
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

30. hardware
design! lovemark!
record
companies! switching
marketing! costs!
seamless mass
music market!
experience!
iPod
hardware! apple.com!
&
OEMs! content !
nts
agreeme iTunes iTunes retail
software! store! stores!
people!
Apple Apple
brand! stores!
large
manu- some hardwa
re
facturing! marketing music revenu
! es!
people & sales! revenues!
30
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

31. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

32. Detonadores
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

33. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

34. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

35. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

36. A corporation is a living
organism; it has to
continue to shed its skin.
Methods have to change.
Focus has to change.
Values have to change.
The sum total of those
changes is
transformation.
— Andrew Grove
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

37. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

38. “La Innovación no es una opción, es un requisito
fundamental para sobrevivir. En el transcurso de la
historia las sociedades innovadoras han vencido
siempre a sus rivales menos creativos”.
— Kaihan Krippendorff
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

39. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

40. Tres Empresas innovadoras
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

41. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

42. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

43. Tres Empresas mexicanas
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

44. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

45. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

46. “La innovación es el polvo mágico que puede hacer de nuestros
países, ciudades o pueblos, lugares atractivos, dinámicos y dignos
para vivir e invertir. En estos tiempos difíciles es crucial que
nuestras políticas se orienten hacia la creación del mejor ambiente
posible para que la innovación florezca y se disemine. Nuestros
políticos, por lo tanto, no deben pensar como mecánicos, sino
como jardineros”
— José Ángel Gurría
8 de Junio de 2009, Montreal, Canada
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

47. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

48. Nanotecnología
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

49. Nanotecnología
Biotecnología
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

50. Nanotecnología
Biotecnología
Tecnologías limpias
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

51. Nanotecnología
Biotecnología
Tecnologías limpias
Telecomunicaciones e informática
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

52. Nanotecnología
Biotecnología
Tecnologías limpias
Telecomunicaciones e informática
Energía
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

53. Nanotecnología
Biotecnología
Tecnologías limpias
Telecomunicaciones e informática
Energía
Manufactura sustentable
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

54. México
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

55. MEXICO
Over the past decade Mexico’s efforts graduates that enter the domestic labour
have focused on achieving macroeconomic market.
stability and stronger growth. However, its Mexico’s technological and scientific
reforms have not led to the productivity performance, as measured by patents and
growth necessary to catch up to other publications, is low, and knowledge-
OECD countries. Continued structural intensive market services, such as post
reforms will be needed to put the country and telecommunications, represent a very
on a firm basis to boost innovation, produc- small share of gross value added (less
tivity and growth. than 13% in 2004 compared to an OECD
average of 20%). More positively, inter-
Mexico’s level of development affects
national linkages appear well developed,
its innovation system. Its assets include a
especially with the United States. There is a
young population and geographical prox-
high rate of foreign ownership of domestic
imity to the largest market in the OECD
inventions (61% in 2001-03) and of inter-
area. However, various structural weak-
national co-inventions (45% in 2002-04), as
nesses inhibit innovation, including gaps in
evidenced by applications to the European
physical infrastructure, restrictive regula-
Patent Office. Technology exports also grew
tions, and, most importantly, a low level of
strongly from 1996 to 2005, by over 10% a
human capital.
year on average. Uptake of technology is
Mexico’s R&D intensity is one of the also improving; the Internet domain .mx
lowest in the OECD area; gross domestic had the highest average annual growth
expenditure on R&D (GERD) is 0.5% of GDP. (67%) in Internet hosts in the OECD area
However, this ratio is not out of line with between 1998 and 2006.
Mexico’s income level, and growth in (real) The government’s innovation policy
GERD has been robust, averaging almost provides one of the most favourable tax
10% a year from 1996 to 2005. Public insti- treatments for R&D in the OECD area, with
tutions and universities continue to play an one unit of R&D expenditure resulting in
important role in R&D; the business sector 0.37 units of tax relief. Government fund-
finances 47% of R&D and performs just ing for business R&D has also increased;
under 50%, below the OECD average. the share of business R&D financed by
The number of science and engineer- government more than doubled from 2.8%
ing graduates as a proportion of all new in 1995 to 5.7% in 2005.
degrees is above the OECD average, with a The key challenge at this stage is to
quarter of new university degrees in 2005. establish supportive underlying conditions
However, university graduates are a small for innovation, particularly with respect to
group, and the majority of the working-age education levels and the competitive
lunes 18 de enero de 2010
population leaves school before attaining and regulatory environment. Enhancing

56. MEXICO
Over the past decade Mexico’s efforts graduates that enter the domestic labour
have focused on achieving macroeconomic market.
stability and stronger growth. However, its Mexico’s technological and scientific
reforms have not led to the productivity performance, as measured by patents and
growth necessary to catch up to other publications, is low, and knowledge-
OECD countries. Continued structural intensive market services, such as post
reforms will be needed to put the country and telecommunications, represent a very
on a firm basis to boost innovation, produc- small share of gross value added (less
tivity and growth. than 13% in 2004 compared to an OECD
average of 20%). More positively, inter-
Mexico’s level of development affects
national linkages appear well developed,
its innovation system. Its assets include a
especially with the United States. There is a
young population and geographical prox-
high rate of foreign ownership of domestic
imity to the largest market in the OECD
inventions (61% in 2001-03) and of inter-
area. However, various structural weak-
national co-inventions (45% in 2002-04), as
Debilidad estructural que inhibe la
nesses inhibit innovation, including gaps in
evidenced by applications to the European
physical infrastructure, restrictive regula-
Patent Office. Technology exports also grew
tions, and, most importantly, a low level of
innovación, como la brecha existente en
strongly from 1996 to 2005, by over 10% a
human capital.
year on average. Uptake of technology is
Mexico’s R&D intensity is one of the also improving; the Internet domain .mx
infraestructura física, regulaciones restrictivas
lowest in the OECD area; gross domestic
expenditure on R&D (GERD) is 0.5% of GDP.
had the highest average annual growth
(67%) in Internet hosts in the OECD area
However, this ratio is not out of line with
y un bajo nivel en el capital humano.
between 1998 and 2006.
Mexico’s income level, and growth in (real) The government’s innovation policy
GERD has been robust, averaging almost provides one of the most favourable tax
10% a year from 1996 to 2005. Public insti- treatments for R&D in the OECD area, with
tutions and universities continue to play an one unit of R&D expenditure resulting in
important role in R&D; the business sector 0.37 units of tax relief. Government fund-
finances 47% of R&D and performs just ing for business R&D has also increased;
under 50%, below the OECD average. the share of business R&D financed by
The number of science and engineer- government more than doubled from 2.8%
ing graduates as a proportion of all new in 1995 to 5.7% in 2005.
degrees is above the OECD average, with a The key challenge at this stage is to
quarter of new university degrees in 2005. establish supportive underlying conditions
However, university graduates are a small for innovation, particularly with respect to
group, and the majority of the working-age education levels and the competitive
lunes 18 de enero de 2010
population leaves school before attaining and regulatory environment. Enhancing

57. MEXICO
Over the past decade Mexico’s efforts graduates that enter the domestic labour
have focused on achieving macroeconomic market.
stability and stronger growth. However, its Mexico’s technological and scientific
reforms have not led to the productivity performance, as measured by patents and
growth necessary to catch up to other publications, is low, and knowledge-
OECD countries. Continued structural intensive market services, such as post
reforms will be needed to put the country and telecommunications, represent a very
on a firm basis to boost innovation, produc- small share of gross value added (less
tivity and growth. than 13% in 2004 compared to an OECD
average of 20%). More positively, inter-
Mexico’s level of development affects
national linkages appear well developed,
its innovation system. Its assets include a
especially with the United States. There is a
young population and geographical prox-
high rate of foreign ownership of domestic
imity to the largest market in the OECD
inventions (61% in 2001-03) and of inter-
area. However, various structural weak-
national co-inventions (45% in 2002-04), as
nesses inhibit innovation, including gaps in
El gasto en ID es apenas 0.5% del PIB.
physical infrastructure, restrictive regula-
tions, and, most importantly, a low level of
evidenced by applications to the European
Patent Office. Technology exports also grew
strongly from 1996 to 2005, by over 10% a
Las instituciones privadas financian menos
human capital.
year on average. Uptake of technology is
Mexico’s R&D intensity is one of the also improving; the Internet domain .mx
del 50% de la ID, abajo del promedio de los
lowest in the OECD area; gross domestic had the highest average annual growth
expenditure on R&D (GERD) is 0.5% of GDP. (67%) in Internet hosts in the OECD area
However, this ratio is not out of line with between 1998 and 2006.
países de la OECD
Mexico’s income level, and growth in (real)
GERD has been robust, averaging almost
The government’s innovation policy
provides one of the most favourable tax
10% a year from 1996 to 2005. Public insti- treatments for R&D in the OECD area, with
tutions and universities continue to play an one unit of R&D expenditure resulting in
important role in R&D; the business sector 0.37 units of tax relief. Government fund-
finances 47% of R&D and performs just ing for business R&D has also increased;
under 50%, below the OECD average. the share of business R&D financed by
The number of science and engineer- government more than doubled from 2.8%
ing graduates as a proportion of all new in 1995 to 5.7% in 2005.
degrees is above the OECD average, with a The key challenge at this stage is to
quarter of new university degrees in 2005. establish supportive underlying conditions
However, university graduates are a small for innovation, particularly with respect to
group, and the majority of the working-age education levels and the competitive
lunes 18 de enero de 2010
population leaves school before attaining and regulatory environment. Enhancing

58. 3. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: COUNTRY NOTES
MEXICO
Over the past decade Mexico’s efforts graduates that enter the domestic labour
have focused on achieving macroeconomic market.
stability and stronger growth. However, its Mexico’s technological and scientific
reforms have not led to the productivity performance, as measured by patents and
growth necessary to catch up to other publications, is low, and knowledge-
OECD countries. Continued structural intensive market services, such as post
reforms will be needed to put the country and telecommunications, represent a very
on a firm basis to boost innovation, produc- small share of gross value added (less
tivity and growth. than 13% in 2004 compared to an OECD
average of 20%). More positively, inter-
Mexico’s level of development affects
national linkages appear well developed,
its innovation system. Its assets include a
especially with the United States. There is a
young population and geographical prox-
high rate of foreign ownership of domestic
imity to the largest market in the OECD
inventions (61% in 2001-03) and of inter-
area. However, various structural weak-
national co-inventions (45% in 2002-04), as
nesses inhibit innovation, including gaps in
evidenced by applications to the European
physical infrastructure, restrictive regula-
Patent Office. Technology exports also grew
tions, and, most importantly, a low level of
strongly from 1996 to 2005, by over 10% a
human capital.
year on average. Uptake of technology is
Mexico’s R&D intensity is one of the also improving; the Internet domain .mx
lowest in the OECD area; gross domestic had the highest average annual growth
expenditure on R&D (GERD) is 0.5% of GDP. (67%) in Internet hosts in the OECD area
However, this ratio is not out of line with between 1998 and 2006.
Mexico’s income level, and growth in (real) The government’s innovation policy
GERD has been robust, averaging almost provides one of the most favourable tax
10% a year from 1996 to 2005. Public insti- treatments for R&D in the OECD area, with
tutions and universities continue to play an one unit of R&D expenditure resulting in
important role in R&D; the business sector 0.37 units of tax relief. Government fund-
finances 47% of R&D and performs just ing for business R&D has also increased;
under 50%, below the OECD average. the share of business R&D financed by
lunes 18 de enero de 2010 government more than doubled from 2.8%

59. 3. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: COUNTRY NOTES
MEXICO
Over the past decade Mexico’s efforts graduates that enter the domestic labour
have focused on achieving macroeconomic market.
stability and stronger growth. However, its Mexico’s technological and scientific
reforms have not led to the productivity performance, as measured by patents and
growth necessary to catch up to other publications, is low, and knowledge-
OECD countries. Continued structural intensive market services, such as post
reforms will be needed to put the country and telecommunications, represent a very
El desempeño de la ciencia y de la tecnología
on a firm basis to boost innovation, produc-
tivity and growth.
small share of gross value added (less
than 13% in 2004 compared to an OECD
es bajo cuando se mide en patentes y
average of 20%). More positively, inter-
Mexico’s level of development affects
national linkages appear well developed,
its innovation system. Its assets include a
especially with the United States. There is a
young population and geographical prox-
publicaciones y el mercado del conocimiento
imity to the largest market in the OECD
area. However, various structural weak-
high rate of foreign ownership of domestic
inventions (61% in 2001-03) and of inter-
national co-inventions (45% in 2002-04), as
intensivo representa menos del 13%,
nesses inhibit innovation, including gaps in
evidenced by applications to the European
physical infrastructure, restrictive regula-
Patent Office. Technology exports also grew
tions, and, most importantly, a low level of
comparado con 20% en OECD (2004).
strongly from 1996 to 2005, by over 10% a
human capital.
year on average. Uptake of technology is
Mexico’s R&D intensity is one of the also improving; the Internet domain .mx
lowest in the OECD area; gross domestic had the highest average annual growth
expenditure on R&D (GERD) is 0.5% of GDP. (67%) in Internet hosts in the OECD area
However, this ratio is not out of line with between 1998 and 2006.
Mexico’s income level, and growth in (real) The government’s innovation policy
GERD has been robust, averaging almost provides one of the most favourable tax
10% a year from 1996 to 2005. Public insti- treatments for R&D in the OECD area, with
tutions and universities continue to play an one unit of R&D expenditure resulting in
important role in R&D; the business sector 0.37 units of tax relief. Government fund-
finances 47% of R&D and performs just ing for business R&D has also increased;
under 50%, below the OECD average. the share of business R&D financed by
lunes 18 de enero de 2010 government more than doubled from 2.8%

60. 3. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: COUNTRY NOTES
MEXICO
Over the past decade Mexico’s efforts graduates that enter the domestic labour
have focused on achieving macroeconomic market.
stability and stronger growth. However, its Mexico’s technological and scientific
reforms have not led to the productivity performance, as measured by patents and
growth necessary to catch up to other publications, is low, and knowledge-
OECD countries. Continued structural intensive market services, such as post
reforms will be needed to put the country and telecommunications, represent a very
La propiedad de extranjeros de invenciones
on a firm basis to boost innovation, produc-
tivity and growth.
small share of gross value added (less
than 13% in 2004 compared to an OECD
domésticas fue 61% entre 2001 y 2003 .
Mexico’s level of development affects
its innovation system. Its assets include a
average of 20%). More positively, inter-
national linkages appear well developed,
especially with the United States. There is a
young population and geographical prox-
high rate of foreign ownership of domestic
imity to the largest market in the OECD
inventions (61% in 2001-03) and of inter-
area. However, various structural weak-
national co-inventions (45% in 2002-04), as
nesses inhibit innovation, including gaps in
evidenced by applications to the European
physical infrastructure, restrictive regula-
Patent Office. Technology exports also grew
tions, and, most importantly, a low level of
strongly from 1996 to 2005, by over 10% a
human capital.
year on average. Uptake of technology is
Mexico’s R&D intensity is one of the also improving; the Internet domain .mx
lowest in the OECD area; gross domestic had the highest average annual growth
expenditure on R&D (GERD) is 0.5% of GDP. (67%) in Internet hosts in the OECD area
However, this ratio is not out of line with between 1998 and 2006.
Mexico’s income level, and growth in (real) The government’s innovation policy
GERD has been robust, averaging almost provides one of the most favourable tax
10% a year from 1996 to 2005. Public insti- treatments for R&D in the OECD area, with
tutions and universities continue to play an one unit of R&D expenditure resulting in
important role in R&D; the business sector 0.37 units of tax relief. Government fund-
finances 47% of R&D and performs just ing for business R&D has also increased;
under 50%, below the OECD average. the share of business R&D financed by
lunes 18 de enero de 2010 government more than doubled from 2.8%

61. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

62. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

63. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

64. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

65. En tu fuente, ¿dónde hay innovaoción?
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

66. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

67. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

68. La nota sobre innovación
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

69. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

70. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

71. Periodismo
den
Innovación
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

72. El periodismo enfrenta su
propio dilema de
innovación
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

73. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

74. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

75. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

76. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

77. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

78. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

79. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

80. ¿La muerte del periodismo?
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

81. ¿La muerte del periodismo?
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

82. ¿La muerte del periodismo?
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

83. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

84. “Nadie quiere morir. Incluso las personas que desean ir
al cielo no quieren morir para llegar ahí. Pero la muerte
es el destino que todos compartimos. Nadie se escapa
de ello.Y es así como debería ser porque la Muerte es
muy probablemente la invención más sencilla de la Vida.
Es el agente de cambio de la vida. Limpia lo viejo para
abrir paso a lo nuevo”.
— Steve Jobs
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

85. Innovación en medios
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

86. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

87. Tendencias en medios
Las 7 fuerzas
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

88. 1
Mayor consumo de medios
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

89. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

90. 2
Fragmentación
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

91. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

92. 3
Participación
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

93. La era de las redes sociales
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

94. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

95. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

96. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

97. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

98. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

99. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

100. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

101. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

102. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

103. 4
Personalización
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

104. N=1
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

105. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

106. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

107. 5
Nuevos modelos de
generación de ingresos
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

108. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

109. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

110. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

111. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

112. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

113. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

114. Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

115. Posibles escenarios 2007 a 2015
Negativo-negativo
Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

116. Posibles escenarios 2007 a 2015
Negativo-negativo
Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

117. Posibles escenarios 2007 a 2015
Negativo-negativo Negativo Positivo
Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

118. Posibles escenarios 2007 a 2015
Negativo-negativo Negativo Positivo
Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

119. Posibles escenarios 2007 a 2015
Negativo-negativo Negativo Positivo
Positivo Negativo
Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

120. Posibles escenarios 2007 a 2015
Negativo-negativo Negativo Positivo
Positivo Negativo
Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

121. Posibles escenarios 2007 a 2015
Negativo-negativo Negativo Positivo
Positivo Negativo Positivo Positivo
Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

122. Posibles escenarios 2007 a 2015
Negativo-negativo Negativo Positivo
Positivo Negativo Positivo Positivo
Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

123. Posibles escenarios 2007 a 2015
Negativo-negativo Negativo Positivo
Positivo Negativo Positivo Positivo
Print Web
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

124. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

125. Como se desplazarán los ingresos B2B al
entorno on line en los siguientes 5 años
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

126. Como se desplazarán los ingresos B2B al
entorno on line en los siguientes 5 años
Otros Web
2% 8%
Print
90%
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

127. Como se desplazarán los ingresos B2B al
entorno on line en los siguientes 5 años
Otros
15%
Print
25%
Web
60%
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

128. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

129. 6
Cambio generacional
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

130. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

131. 7
Mayor ancho de banda
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

132. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

133. El nuevo perfil de periodista
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

134. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

135. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

136. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

137. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

138. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

139. Comentarios / Conclusiones
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

140. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

141. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

142. Escenarios
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

143. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

144. Fuerzas
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

145. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

146. Incertidumbres
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

147. lunes 18 de enero de 2010

148. Escenarios
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

149. Audiencia especializada
Audiencia poco especializada
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

150. Audiencia especializada
Menor edad Mayor edad
Audiencia poco especializada
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

151. Innovación
David Luna
Editor General
Revista
Grupo Editorial Expansión
A Time Inc Company
dluna@expansion.com.mx
lunes 18 de enero de 2010

152. Innovación
David Luna
Editor General
Revista MANU
FACTURA
Grupo Editorial Expansión
A Time Inc Company
dluna@expansion.com.mx
lunes 18 de enero de 2010