SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  26
Dramatic Performance in
     Teaching Drama in EFL Contexts

             Presenter: Heng Mindy Jen
             Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu
             Date: January 5, 2011
1/5/2011                                          1
Citation
           Gorjian, B., Moosavinia, R. S. &
           Jabripour, A. (March 2010), Dramatic
           Performance in Teaching Drama in EFL
           Contexts. The Electronic Journal for
           English as a Second Language, 13(4),
           Retrieved November 20, 2010, from
           http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ898206
           .pdf
1/5/2011                                          2
Contents
           Introduction
           Methodology
           Results
           Conclusions
           Reflections
1/5/2011                  3
Purpose of Study
           Teaching English drama through
           dramatic performance could
           enhance English literature students’
           knowledge of drama at university
           level.

1/5/2011                                          4
Research Question
           Will EFL students acquire a higher
           understanding of a play through
           traditional or performance-based
           approach to teaching drama?


1/5/2011                                        5
Introduction
                     Talking about the author



                           Traditional
                                                WITHOU
     Talking about
      characters            Teaching              T bringing
                                                characters life to
                                                 the real world

                      Talking about the plot
1/5/2011                                                             6
Introduction
                     Talking about the author



                                               Performance
     Talking about           The
      characters            study              the play on
                                               stage

                      Talking about the plot        Treatment7
1/5/2011
Methodology
           Participants    90
           Sample          60
           Age             18-24
           Country         Iran
           Background      Major in English language and literature in
                           Drama II
           Education       Islamic Azad University of Shiraz
           English Level   Intermediate IELTS
           Time            The whole semester
1/5/2011                                                                 8
Methodology
               15 session     Choose the
Experimental                                  Memorize the   Perform the
               of the two    roles for each                                Post-test
   Group                                        scripts        scenes
                  plays         episode




  Control      15 session
                                 Survey the contents of the two plays       Post-
               of the two
  Group           plays                                                      test


    1/5/2011                                                                  9
Post-test
                                       Think-Aloud
     30 multiple-choice
                                         protocol
                                           Classroom
                  2 points                environment

                                       Motivation in class
                                         participants
           The reliability was 0.90
                   by KR21            Activities in classroom
1/5/2011                                                        10
Materials




1/5/2011
                       11
First edition cover page
1/5/2011
                                 12
1/5/2011
           13
Materials




1/5/2011               14
1/5/2011   15
Results
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of the Groups on the Post-test

                                                                   Std.
      Groups        N      Max.         Min.        Mean
                                                                 Deviation

      Control     30    47.60           5.60     28.5600         10.2912


 Experimental     30    56.00           3.80     37.0267         12.3657

  1/5/2011                                                            16
Ho: There will be no significant difference between EFL
                            Results
    students’ knowledge of drama scores in traditional
    versus performance-based approaches
Table 2. Independent Samples T-Test

                    Confidence level               Sig.
 Groups                                      df                   t
                                                   (2-tailed)
                   Upper       Lower
Control
             -10.9988          -5.9345      29        .000       6.839
Experimental
                                                                P<.05
       The null-hypothesis was REJECTED !!
 1/5/2011                                                             17
Classroom Environment




 1/5/2011               18
Motivation in Class Participation




  1/5/2011                          19
Activities in the Classroom




  1/5/2011                    20
Conclusions
              Performance-based approach
               encourages group practice.

                Learners’ self-confidence
                     was increased.

           Learners’ motivation was increased.
1/5/2011                                         21
Reflections
           Teachers should realize students are the
           most important roles in classroom.

           This research is beneficial to EFL learners.



1/5/2011                                                  22
Reflections
           This study only relied on multiple-choice
           items to be the post-test.

           IELTS score was not described clearly.

           The effect of dramatic performance on
           teaching L2 culture could also be
           considered in future investigation.
1/5/2011                                               23
Thanks for
your listening!!



 1/5/2011          24
KR-21 Formula
  • 庫李法(Kuder-Richardson method): 庫-李二氏
    於 1937年提出一些評估信度的公式,其中
    比較常用者有兩個公式,稱為 KR20 和 KR21
  • 當評量工具的難度指數大體上均在 50%左右
    時,用 KR21來計算信度比較簡便,不過當試
    題之難度不一,且變化很大時,使用 KR21
    往往會低估信度。
                  Sorce: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:HbEK5Cj4-
                  LYJ:140.122.143.143/doc/evaluate3.htm+KR-21+formula&cd=7&hl=zh-TW&ct=clnk&gl=tw
1/5/2011                                                                                   25
Think Aloud Report
  Think-aloudprotocols involve participants
   Think aloudasked to say whatever they are
    Users are protocol (or think-aloud
   This enables observers to see first-hand the
  protocols, orthinking, a method used toa set they
   thinking aloud as they are performing gather
    looking at, TAP) is doing, and feeling, as of
   process of task completion (rather than only its
  dataabouttasks.task. in product design and
   specified their testing
    go in usability
   final product).
  development, in psychology and a range of
  social sciences (e.g., reading, writing and
  translation process research).


1/5/2011                                                                         26
                                 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_aloud_protocol

Contenu connexe

Similaire à 0105 2

Proposal ppt trista
Proposal ppt tristaProposal ppt trista
Proposal ppt tristaTsui-Yu Lin
 
Proposal presentation v2 1020107
Proposal presentation v2 1020107Proposal presentation v2 1020107
Proposal presentation v2 1020107思竹 劉
 
Classroom research
Classroom researchClassroom research
Classroom researchIsabel Matos
 
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in classFactors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in classsteadyfalcon
 
June 2008 e_book_editions
June 2008 e_book_editionsJune 2008 e_book_editions
June 2008 e_book_editionsRatri Cahyani
 
Reliability of pronunciation tests seminar
Reliability of pronunciation tests seminarReliability of pronunciation tests seminar
Reliability of pronunciation tests seminarIrina K
 
Presentation 2
Presentation 2Presentation 2
Presentation 2s10122609
 
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.129922604
 
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414思竹 劉
 
CALL & Individual Differences - Group 3
CALL & Individual Differences - Group 3CALL & Individual Differences - Group 3
CALL & Individual Differences - Group 3miftahsaleh
 
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608思竹 劉
 
20080603 Assessment Final
20080603 Assessment Final20080603 Assessment Final
20080603 Assessment FinalElly Lin
 
Joanna Final Defence
Joanna Final DefenceJoanna Final Defence
Joanna Final DefenceJoanna Yang
 
Poster Presentation for Asia TEFL 2014 Conference: Evaluation of Pronunciatio...
Poster Presentation for Asia TEFL 2014 Conference: Evaluation of Pronunciatio...Poster Presentation for Asia TEFL 2014 Conference: Evaluation of Pronunciatio...
Poster Presentation for Asia TEFL 2014 Conference: Evaluation of Pronunciatio...Hooi Shyan
 
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313Gen Yen Wu
 

Similaire à 0105 2 (20)

Proposal ppt trista
Proposal ppt tristaProposal ppt trista
Proposal ppt trista
 
Proposal presentation v2 1020107
Proposal presentation v2 1020107Proposal presentation v2 1020107
Proposal presentation v2 1020107
 
0316 2
0316 20316 2
0316 2
 
Classroom research
Classroom researchClassroom research
Classroom research
 
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in classFactors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
 
June 2008 e_book_editions
June 2008 e_book_editionsJune 2008 e_book_editions
June 2008 e_book_editions
 
Beyond Translation: Designing ELL-Focused Professional Development for Paraed...
Beyond Translation: Designing ELL-Focused Professional Development for Paraed...Beyond Translation: Designing ELL-Focused Professional Development for Paraed...
Beyond Translation: Designing ELL-Focused Professional Development for Paraed...
 
Beyond translation
Beyond translationBeyond translation
Beyond translation
 
Reliability of pronunciation tests seminar
Reliability of pronunciation tests seminarReliability of pronunciation tests seminar
Reliability of pronunciation tests seminar
 
Presentation 2
Presentation 2Presentation 2
Presentation 2
 
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
 
Leya 11.26
Leya 11.26Leya 11.26
Leya 11.26
 
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
 
CALL & Individual Differences - Group 3
CALL & Individual Differences - Group 3CALL & Individual Differences - Group 3
CALL & Individual Differences - Group 3
 
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
 
20080603 Assessment Final
20080603 Assessment Final20080603 Assessment Final
20080603 Assessment Final
 
Joanna Final Defence
Joanna Final DefenceJoanna Final Defence
Joanna Final Defence
 
Article presentation fall 2011
Article presentation fall 2011Article presentation fall 2011
Article presentation fall 2011
 
Poster Presentation for Asia TEFL 2014 Conference: Evaluation of Pronunciatio...
Poster Presentation for Asia TEFL 2014 Conference: Evaluation of Pronunciatio...Poster Presentation for Asia TEFL 2014 Conference: Evaluation of Pronunciatio...
Poster Presentation for Asia TEFL 2014 Conference: Evaluation of Pronunciatio...
 
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
 

0105 2

  • 1. Dramatic Performance in Teaching Drama in EFL Contexts Presenter: Heng Mindy Jen Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu Date: January 5, 2011 1/5/2011 1
  • 2. Citation Gorjian, B., Moosavinia, R. S. & Jabripour, A. (March 2010), Dramatic Performance in Teaching Drama in EFL Contexts. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4), Retrieved November 20, 2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ898206 .pdf 1/5/2011 2
  • 3. Contents Introduction Methodology Results Conclusions Reflections 1/5/2011 3
  • 4. Purpose of Study Teaching English drama through dramatic performance could enhance English literature students’ knowledge of drama at university level. 1/5/2011 4
  • 5. Research Question Will EFL students acquire a higher understanding of a play through traditional or performance-based approach to teaching drama? 1/5/2011 5
  • 6. Introduction Talking about the author Traditional WITHOU Talking about characters Teaching T bringing characters life to the real world Talking about the plot 1/5/2011 6
  • 7. Introduction Talking about the author Performance Talking about The characters study the play on stage Talking about the plot Treatment7 1/5/2011
  • 8. Methodology Participants 90 Sample 60 Age 18-24 Country Iran Background Major in English language and literature in Drama II Education Islamic Azad University of Shiraz English Level Intermediate IELTS Time The whole semester 1/5/2011 8
  • 9. Methodology 15 session Choose the Experimental Memorize the Perform the of the two roles for each Post-test Group scripts scenes plays episode Control 15 session Survey the contents of the two plays Post- of the two Group plays test 1/5/2011 9
  • 10. Post-test Think-Aloud 30 multiple-choice protocol Classroom 2 points environment Motivation in class participants The reliability was 0.90 by KR21 Activities in classroom 1/5/2011 10
  • 12. First edition cover page 1/5/2011 12
  • 13. 1/5/2011 13
  • 15. 1/5/2011 15
  • 16. Results Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of the Groups on the Post-test Std. Groups N Max. Min. Mean Deviation Control 30 47.60 5.60 28.5600 10.2912 Experimental 30 56.00 3.80 37.0267 12.3657 1/5/2011 16
  • 17. Ho: There will be no significant difference between EFL Results students’ knowledge of drama scores in traditional versus performance-based approaches Table 2. Independent Samples T-Test Confidence level Sig. Groups df t (2-tailed) Upper Lower Control -10.9988 -5.9345 29 .000 6.839 Experimental P<.05 The null-hypothesis was REJECTED !! 1/5/2011 17
  • 19. Motivation in Class Participation 1/5/2011 19
  • 20. Activities in the Classroom 1/5/2011 20
  • 21. Conclusions Performance-based approach encourages group practice. Learners’ self-confidence was increased. Learners’ motivation was increased. 1/5/2011 21
  • 22. Reflections Teachers should realize students are the most important roles in classroom. This research is beneficial to EFL learners. 1/5/2011 22
  • 23. Reflections This study only relied on multiple-choice items to be the post-test. IELTS score was not described clearly. The effect of dramatic performance on teaching L2 culture could also be considered in future investigation. 1/5/2011 23
  • 25. KR-21 Formula • 庫李法(Kuder-Richardson method): 庫-李二氏 於 1937年提出一些評估信度的公式,其中 比較常用者有兩個公式,稱為 KR20 和 KR21 • 當評量工具的難度指數大體上均在 50%左右 時,用 KR21來計算信度比較簡便,不過當試 題之難度不一,且變化很大時,使用 KR21 往往會低估信度。 Sorce: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:HbEK5Cj4- LYJ:140.122.143.143/doc/evaluate3.htm+KR-21+formula&cd=7&hl=zh-TW&ct=clnk&gl=tw 1/5/2011 25
  • 26. Think Aloud Report Think-aloudprotocols involve participants Think aloudasked to say whatever they are Users are protocol (or think-aloud This enables observers to see first-hand the protocols, orthinking, a method used toa set they thinking aloud as they are performing gather looking at, TAP) is doing, and feeling, as of process of task completion (rather than only its dataabouttasks.task. in product design and specified their testing go in usability final product). development, in psychology and a range of social sciences (e.g., reading, writing and translation process research). 1/5/2011 26 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_aloud_protocol