This document is a complaint filed by Manjinder Singh Dhillon, a government food inspector, against Darshan Singh, a milk vendor and karyana merchant in Barnala, Punjab. Mr. Dhillon inspected Mr. Singh's premises on March 25, 2008 and found him storing approximately 30kg of cow's milk in a plastic can for sale without a valid license, as required by law. Mr. Dhillon purchased a 1.5 liter sample of the milk, which was then sent to a public analyst. The public analyst's report found the sample to contain 8% milk solids-not-fat, below the minimum standard of 8.5%, indicating adulteration. The complaint requests that action
Call Girls Service Nandiambakkam | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
State Vs Dashan Singh vill-Sekha final
1. THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE BARNALA
���������
�������������������� State through Govt.
Food Inspector
������������������������������������
������������������������������������
����� Complainant
������������������������������������
���������� Versus
Darshan Singh s/o Sh.Kanail Singh (Milk vendor& Karyana Merchant ) near to
Rajindera Medicose/o Village Sekha, Barnala.
������������������������������������
������������������������������������
������� ���.���Accused
Complaint u/s 7/16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.I.954 and U/r 24 & 50 of
the PFA. Act .Rules 1.955.
It is Respectfully Submitted:�
1. That I Manjinder Singh Dhillon ,the Complainant has been appointed as
Government Food Inspector and also notified through Punjab Government vide
Gazette notification FD(2)PB,98/14766 dated 15/10/1998 to seize samples under
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act,1954 in the state of Punjab.
Notification photo copy Annexure as
I�������������������
2. That I am also authorized to launch prosecution under the Prevention of Food
Adulteration Act, 1954 in the state of Punjab and notified through Punjab Government
Gazette notification no.10/10/89-4 HB-lV/34197 dated
3/10/1999.�������������������������������
������������������������������������
����������
������������������������Notification photo copy
Annexure as
II�������������������������������
3. That on 25/3/2008 I the complainant inspected the premises of Darshan Singh
��Karyana merchant & Milk Vendor �who was�� keeping cow milk in plastic can
for sale to the public for human consumption .
4. That I disclosed my Identity to the accused as Government Food Inspector and asked him to
show the valid License for sale of milk and milk products as required under provisions of law
2. under Rule 24 of P.F.A Rules,1955 but he failed to show the
same���������������������������������������
��������������
5 That accused was found carrying approx. approx. 30Kg of cow milk in a plastic can�� f That a
request was made to the persons present� for joining the proceedings of food sampling
procedure as public witness, but none
agreed��������������������������������������
�����������������������������������������
�����������������������������������������
���������������������������� 6. That I served the notice on
Form VI in writing to take sample of cow Milk which. was signed by me and also signed by� the
accused
Original Form six(VI) is Annexure as III
7. That I purchased 1500 ml of cow Milk from the plastic can containing approx. 30Kg of cow
Milk after stirring the bulk quantity of cow Milk with help of neat clean & dry glass rod stirrer 5
time clockwise and 5 time anticlockwise from top to bottom and vice versa .The purchased
Quantity 1500 ml was taken into neat, clean & dry glass jar and added the prescribed quantity of
preservative and homogenized properly payment of Rs.25/- Was made and a payment receipt
was prepared at the spot which was signed by me and by the
accused���������������������������������
������������� original receipt is Annexure as IV
8. That the 1500 ml� of cow Milk divided into three equal parts approx. 500ml each into three
neat clean & dry glass bottles. A spot memo was prepared which was signed by me and by��
the accused
original spot memo is Annexure as
V������������������������������������
��������������� ���
9. That each sample bottle was labeled, fastened and wrapped in a strong� thick paper .The
edges of paper were pasted on the sides of each sample portions and affixed with the help of
Gum.
10.That three paper slip issued by the State Health Authority having same serial slip no.19824
duly signed by Local Health Authority , Barnala along with his code no. BS/68/08� written on
the slip itself. Each slip were pasted on the each sample portions with the help of gum covering
the mouth of each sample and were further secured by means of strong thread. The all the
sample portions were sealed at the spot on the five distinct places bearing the seal impression
� MSD�
11.That the signature of the accused were taken on the each sample portion in a manner that
half the signature appears on wrappers of the sample portions and half on the paper slip
wrapped on the same sample portions I too signed in similar manner
3. 12.That on reaching the office of LHA, Barnala on the same day I prepared five copies of
Memorandum Form VII and three seal impressions of the Seal used to seal sample portions were
affixed upon form VII�
original copy is Annexure as VII�
������������������������������������
�������������������������������
13 .That one sealed sample portion along with the copy of Form VII Bearing the three seal
Impressions were sent to Public Analyst Punjab Chandlgarh through special messenger Sh.Manjil
Singh, of Civil Surgeon office ,Barnala In the same day
evening��������������������������������������
���������������������� ��������
14 That a sealed envelop containing one copy of Form VII bearing the seal impression of the seal
used to seal the samples was sent separately through same special messenger
15. That the remaining sealed sample portions and Form VII were deposited at the office of LHA.
Barnala� on the same day evening.�
16. That on receiving the Report of the Public Analyst on Form III ,ln which the Public Analyst
Punjab Chandlgarh is of the opinion that
������� �the content of the sample contains 8.0 % milk-solid-not-Fat
against the minimum prescribe standard of 8.5% The contents of the
sample are therefore Adulterated.
Original Report is Annexure as VII
17. . That� the accused� Darshan Singh s/o Sh.Karnail Singh according to law is fully
responsible� day to day, sale, work and conduct of business of the selling Milk� for human
consumption.
18. That accused Darshan Singh s/o Sh.Karnail Singh (Karyana Merchant & Milk
vendor)r/o Village Sekha, Barnala. ��has committed offence under the Prevention of Food
Adulteration Act,1954 ,action may kindly be taken against him under section 7/16 of
PFA,Act,1954.and under rule 50 of PFA, Rules 1955 by stocking� cow Milk for sale to public for
human consumption without any valid license It is further prayed that since this offence facts
under section 16 which shall be tried In summary trial procedure as said under section 262-265
of Cr.PC.1973
That the Complaint is submitted for disposal In accordance with law, please
4. LIST OF WITNESSES
1.ManJinder Singh Dhillon, Govt. Food Inspect or, Barnala
2.Sh.Harbajan Singh .Dealing Food Clerk O/o Civil Surgeon Barnala
3.Dr.BaIbIr Singh Local Health Authority , Barnala
4.Sh.yuvraj Singh, Public� Analyst Punjab. Chandlgarh
5 Sh. Manjlt Singh .Special messenger/o Civil Surgeon Office Barnala
ANNEXURES
Complaint in two copies
1. Photocopy of Notification of seizing samples Annexure as -
2. Photocopy of Notification of launching prosecution Annexure II
3. Original copy of Form Six is Annexure as -Ill
4 .Original copy of receipt is Annexure as -IV
5. Original copy of spot memo is Annexure as - V
6Orignal copy of Form seven is Annexure as - VI
7.Orignal Report of Public Analyst is Annexure as -
VII����������������������������������������
����������������������������������
����������������������������������
�����������������������������������������
�������������������������������������
COMPLAINANT
�����������������������������������������
�������������������������������������
Manjinder Singh Dhillon
����������������������
�����������������������������������������
�����������(Government Food Inspector)
�����������������������������������������
�����������������������������������������
������� Barnala
That Complainant being a Public Servant have to Perform multifarious duties and Is unable to
attend this Hon� Court on each and every date of hearing of this case ,hence my presence on
each and every date of hearing of this case may kindly be exempted and APP attached with this
Hon�Court may be allowed to appear on my behalf. However I may be summoned as when so
required
�����������������������������������������
��������������������������������
COMPLAINANT�����������������������������������
�����������������������������������������
������������������������