SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  54
INTERCEPTION, DEPRESSION
STORAGE AND INFILTRATION
Interception – loss of rainfall due to vegetation (from
trees to grass)
                              rainfall




                                throughfall




                           stemflow



Interception = f (vegetation (age, density, type), season, rain intensity, antecedent
conditions)
Forest cover data collected by placing rain gauges under forest canopy and
comparing with gauge data from open area.
Factors affecting interception
• Storm characteristics
  The number and spacing of precipitation
  events, intensity and amount of
  precipitation
   Wind speed
• Vegetation characteristics
   Species, age, density, and condition of
  vegetation
Estimation of interception
Li = Si + KEt
Li = volume of water intercepted (inches)
Si = interception storage that will be retained on the
   foliage, (0.01 to 0.05 in)
   f (wind, gravity, type)
K = ration of surface area of intercepting leaves to
   horizontal projection of tree area,
   Light storms K = 100%
   Heavy storms K = 10 to 40 %
E = amount of water evaporating per hour during
   precipitation (in/hr)
t = time, hrs
DEPRESSION STORAGE
• Depression storage, or ponding, is that
  water on a drainage a drainage basin that
  drains into closed depressions and never
  reaches the outlet of the basin.
• This water becomes trapped in ponds;
  some eventually evaporates and the
  remainder infiltrates into the ground.
• Depression storage occurs on most
  basins.
INFILTRATION
• Infiltration is the vertical movement of
  water through the soil surface.
• Similar terminology:
  percolation into the soil
  seepage out of the soil
Factors influencing infiltration:


• condition of soil surface and vegetative
  cover
• soil properties (moisture content, porosity,
  hydraulic conductivity)
• antecedent moisture conditions
• rainfall intensity
• Infiltration is highly related to soil
  properties.
• Our ability to physically represent the
  infiltration process is related to being able
  to represent soil properties.
• However, soils exhibit a great deal of
  variability spatially and vertically.
• Thus our representations generalize over
  a large variability of soil characteristics
Process of infiltration,
                                                                      Moisture content
         soil moisture description


Soil water zone – max depth from which
water can be returned to surface through                            Saturated zone
capillary action or ET.




                                                                 Transmission zone,
Gravitational water – flow direction                             uniform moisture
is vertical due to gravity.                                      content, not saturated
(unsaturated zone or zone of
aeration)




 Capillary zone, less than
 atmospheric pressure
                                                                                  Wetting front




               Groundwater, saturation at atmospheric pressure
Moisture Content:
Total volume = air volume (voids) + solid volume

η, porosity = volume of voids ÷ total volume

θ, soil moisture content = volume water ÷ total volume

maximum θ = η
Measurement:
Initial efforts to describe infiltration are based on measured data.

Split (double) ring infiltrometer
  • shown to represent Horton parameters fairly well.

  •   Measure rate of vertical movement from center ring
  •   Exterior ring to offset lateral movement of moisture

  •   Change in elevation measured at selected time intervals
      (commonly use a point gauge).

  •   Actually measures maximum infiltration capacity because
      excess water is available.

                                         35 cm

                                         23 cm
Sprinkler infiltrometer
catch and measure runoff rate
infiltration rate = “rainfall” rate - runoff rate12’6’
usually have high application rate therefore
   approaching maximum infiltration rate
Runoff
RUNOFF

Runoff or overland flow will occur if the amount of
water falling on the ground is greater than the
infiltration rate of the surface,.
 Runoff specifically refers to the water leaving an
area of drainage and flowing across the land surface
to points of lower elevation.
It is not the water flowing beneath the surface of the
ground.
This type of water flow is called throughflow.
Runoff involves the following events:

• Rainfall intensity exceeds the soil's infiltration
  rate.
• A thin water layer forms that begins to move
  because of the influence of slope and gravity.
• Flowing water accumulates in depressions.
• Depressions overflow and form small rills.
• Rills merge to form larger streams and rivers.
• Streams and rivers then flow into lakes or
  oceans.
Runoff on a global scale

       •   Surface runoff sends 7 % of the land based precipitation back to the
           ocean to balance the processes of evaporation and precipitation.

Continent                                    Runoff Per Unit Area (mm per yr.)


Europe                                                       300
Asia                                                         286
Africa                                                       136
North and Central America                                    265
South America                                                445
Australia, N.Zealand and New                                 218
Guinea
Antarctica and Greenland                                     165
Streamflow and Stream Discharge


• The term streamflow describes the process of
  water flowing in the organized channels of a
  stream or river.
• Stream discharge represents the volume of
  water passing through a river channel during a
  certain period of time.
• Stream discharge can be expressed
  mathematically with the following equation:
        Q=WxDxV
        – where,
        – Q equals stream discharge usually measured in cubic
          meters per second, W equals channel width, D equals
          channel depth, and V equals velocity of flowing water.
Stream hydrograph

• Because of streamflow's potential hazard to humans
  many streams are gauged by mechanical recorders.
  These instruments record the stream's discharge on a
  hydrograph.
From this graph we can observe the following things:
A small blip caused by rain falling directly into the channel is the first evidence
that stream discharge is changing because of the rainfall.

A significant time interval occurs between the start of rain and the beginning of
the main rise in discharge on the hydrograph. This lag occurs because of the time
required for the precipitation that falls in the stream's basin to eventually reach the
recording station. Usually, the larger the basin the greater the the time lag.

The rapid movement of surface runoff into the stream's channels and
subsequent flow causes the discharge to rise quickly.

The falling limb of the hydrograph tends to be less steep that the rise. This flow
represents the water added from distant tributaries and from throughflow that
occurs in surface soils and sediments.

After some time the hydrograph settles at a constant level known as base flow
stage. Most of the base flow comes from groundwater flow which moves water
into the stream channel very slowly.
the shape and magnitude of the hydrograph is controlled by two sets of factors:

Permanent Factors - slope of basin, soil structure, vegetation, channel density,
etc.

Transient Factors - are those factors associated with precipitation input - size of
storm, intensity, duration of rainfall, etc.
Runoff Models

Historical Perspective

The development and application of hydrological models have gone through a long
    time period, the remarkable dates in the history of the development of
    hydrological models are:

The origins of rainfall-runoff modelling in the broad sense can be found in the
    middle of the 19th century, when Mulvaney (1850), an Irish engineer who
    used in the first time the rational equation to give the peak flow Qp as:
    Qp = CiA
   Where,
C is the coefficient of runoff (dependent on catchment characteristics)
i  is the intensity of rainfall in time Tc and
A   is the area of catchment.
Tc is the time of concentration, the time required for rain falling at the farthest
   point of the catchment to flow to the measuring point of the river.
A major step forward in hydrological analysis was the concept of the unit
hydrograph introduced by the American engineer Sherman in 1932 on the basis
of superposition principle.
The use of unit hydrograph made it possible to calculate not only the flood peak
discharge (as the rational method does) but also the whole hydrograph (the
volume of surface runoff produced by the rainfall event).


The real breakthrough came in the 1950s (Todini, 1988) when hydrologists
became aware of system engineering approaches used for the analysis of
complex dynamic systems. This was the period when conceptual linear models
originated (Nash, 1958, 1960).


Many other approaches to rainfall-runoff modelling were considered in the 1960s.
A large number of conceptual, lumped, rainfall-runoff models appeared thereafter
including the famous Stanford Model IV (Crawford and Linsley, 1966) and the
HBV model (Bergström and Forsman, 1973).
  Stochastic time series models were first introduced by Box and Jenkins (1970)
  which provided hydrologists with an alternative model type.
One remarkable model developed in the late 1970s is the TOPMODEL (Beven and
Kirkby, 1979) that is based on the idea that topography exerts a dominant control on
flow routing through upland catchments is called.




To meet the need of forecasting (1) the effects of land-use changes, (2) the effects
of spatially variable inputs and outputs, (3) the movements of pollutants and
sediments, and (4) the hydrological response of ungauged catchments where no
data are available for calibration of a lumped model, the physically-based
distributed-parameter models were developed. The Systéme Hydrologique
Européen (SHE) model is a excellent example of such models (Abbott et al., 1986).
The macro-scale hydrological models were developed on the basis of the following
   motivations.
    1. First, for a variety of operational and planning purposes, water resource
       managers responsible for large regions need to estimate the spatial
       variability of resources over large areas, at a spatial resolution finer than
       can be provided by observed data alone.
    2. Second, hydrologists and water managers are interested in the effects of
       land-use and climate variability and change over a large geographic
       domain.
    3. Third, there is an increasing need of using hydrologic models as a base to
       estimate point and non-point sources of pollution loading to streams.
    4. Fourth, hydrologists and atmospheric modellers have perceived
       weaknesses in the representation of hydrological processes in regional
       and global atmospheric models.
    5. Examples of GIS supported macro-scale hydrological models include
       those developed by Vörösmarty et al. (1989), the VIC model (Wood et al.,
       1992) and the Macro-PDM (Arnell, 1999). These models are state-of-the-
       art tools in assessing regional and continental scale water resources.
Applications of hydrologic models
Nowadays, mathematical models have taken over the most important tasks in
problem solving in hydrology. The important applications of hydrological model are
summarised below:


Design                                    Operation
      Dams and reservoirs                    Flow forecasting
          design                             Reservoir control
          water yield                        Urban storm drain control
          capacity, failure               Management
      Floods                                 Land-use changes
          frequency                          Climate changes
          mapping                            Point/nonpoint pollution
      Urbanisation                           Groundwater recharge
          storm drains                    Research and teaching
          flood plains                       University training
          channel alterations                Industrial training
Irrigation and drainage                   Research
Runoff models are probably what most hydrologists spontaneously refer to when
discussing hydrological models.

This was also the first branch in which models were used when computers
became easily available in the 1970s.
The basic principle in hydrological modelling is that the model is used to calculate
river flow based on meteorological data, which are available in a basin or in its
vicinity.

Hydrological models include subroutines for the most significant hydrological
processes, such as snow accumulation and melt at different elevations, soil
moisture dynamics, evapotranspiration,recharge of groundwater, runoff
generation and routing in lakes and rivers.

Most runoff models are based on the water balance, using precipitation as a
driving variable and calculating the quantities directed as runoff, R, from the water
balance equation,
R = P – E – DS,
where P is precipitation, E evapotranspiration, and DS represents various storage
terms.
Runoff and Hydrologic Modeling (RS)

      Runoff cannot be directly measured by remote sensing
     techniques.
      However, there are two general areas where remote
     sensing can be used in hydrologic and runoff modeling:

4.   determining watershed geometry, drainage network,
     and other map-type information for distributed
     hydrologic models and for empirical flood peak, annual
     runoff or low flow equations; and
5.   providing input data such as soil moisture or delineated
     land use classes that are used to define runoff
     coefficients
• Remote sensing data can be used to obtain almost any
  information that is typically obtained from maps or aerial
  photography.
• In many regions of the world, remotely sensed data, and
  particularly Landsat, Thematic Mapper (TM) or Systeme
  Probatoire, d'Observation de la Terre (SPOT) data, are the
  only source of good cartographic information.
• Drainage basin areas and the stream network are easily
  obtained from good imagery, even in remote regions
• Topography is a basic need for any hydrologic analysis and
  modeling.
• Remote sensing can provide quantitative topographic
  information of suitable spatial resolution to be extremely
  valuable for model inputs. for example, stereo SPOT
  imagery can be used to develop a Digital Elevation Model
  (DEM) with 10 m horizontal resolution and vertical
  resolution approaching 5 m in ideal cases
• Empirical flood formulae are useful for making
  quick estimates of peak flow when there is very
  little other information available.
• Generally these equations are restricted in
  application to the size range of the basin and the
  climatic/hydrologic region of the world in which
  they were developed.
• Most of the empirical flood formulae relate peak
  discharge to the drainage area of the basin.
• Landsat data have been used to improve empirical
  regression equations of various runoff
  characteristics
MIKE BASIN - MIKE 11's rainfall-runoff model NAM

• Given rainfall and evaporation data, NAM calculates a
  runoff time series that is automatically assigned to MIKE
  BASIN for use in the river flow simulation.

• NAM is a lumped, conceptual rainfall-runoff model
  simulating overland flow, interflow and baseflow as a
  function of the moisture content in each of four mutually
  interrelated storages:
• Snow storage
• Surface storage
• Root zone storage
MIKE 11 is a comprehensive, one-dimensional modelling system for the simulation of
flows, sediment transport and water quality in estuaries, rivers, irrigation systems and
other water bodies.
It is a 4th generation modelling package designed for microcomputers with DOS or
UNIX operating systems and provides the user with an efficient interactive menu and
graphical support system with logical and systematic layouts and sequencing in the
menus.
The package was introduced in 1989 and today the number of installations world-wide
exceeds 300.
The hydrodynamic module of MIKE 11 is based on the complete partial differential
equations of open channel flow (Saint Venant).

The equations are solved by implicit, finite difference techniques.
 The formulations can be applied to branched and looped networks and quasi two-
dimensional flow simulations on floodplains.

MIKE 11 operates on the basis of information about the river and the floodplain
topography, including man- made hydraulic structures such as embankments, weirs,
gates, dredging schemes and flood retention basins.
The hydrodynamic module forms the basis for morphological and water quality studies
by means of add-on modules.
MIKE21 is a comprehensive modelling system for 2-dimensional free surface
flows applicable to studies of lakes, reservoirs, estuaries, bays, coastal areas
and seas where stratification can be neglected.

MIKE21 solves the vertically integrated equations of continuity and conservation
of momentum in two horizontal dimensions.

Like MIKE11, MIKE21 has a modular structure where water quality modules and
sediment transport modules are available as add-on modules to the MIKE21
hydrodynamic module.
Integrated Hydrological Modeling


                    MIKE 3



                   MIKE SWMM
MIKE SHE
An Integrated Hydrological Model

Traditional Models                          Integrated Model


                              Evapotrans-
                              piration
     Unsaturated
        zone                                  Unsaturated      Evapotrans-
                                                 zone          piration


                     Groundwater
                        flow


                                                               Groundwater
    Surface Water/                          Surface Water/
                                                                  flow
    Overland flow                           Overland flow
MIKE SHE – An example of an
            integrated model

 Overland
   flow




Unsaturated
   zone                             Surface
                                     water




Groundwater
   flow
Why not one model?


            MIKE 3



           MIKE SWMM
Different models offer




                                                    MIKE FLOOD
solutions to various problems,




                                                                                      MIKE BASIN
                                                                           MIKE SHE
 with different approach/focus/




                                                                 MIKE 21
                                          MIKE 11
level of detail

Flood forecasting, flood management
Dam break analysis
Reservoir operation
River management, navigation
Sediment transport, river morphology
River water quality
River ecology
Groundwater & surface water interaction
Wetlands
Basin-wide water resources planning
Soil & groundwater contamination
Watershed management
Irrigation, canal operation
MIKE SHE
Application Areas


•   River Basin planning, water use/allocation
•   Irrigation and drainage
•   Wetland protection, restoration and ecology
•   Impacts of farming practices
•   Soil and water management
•   Effects of changes in land use
•   Effects of changes in climate
•   Contamination from waste disposal sites
•   Saline related problems (not released yet)
MIKE SHE
Flexible Process Descriptions




         Processes can be mixed as required
         Processes run on different spatial scales
         Processes run on different time scales
MIKE SHE
MIKE SHE has been used in hundreds
of consulting and research projects
around the world
Web-address: www.dhi.dk
Trends in hydrological modeling
• Models → modules in integrated, flexible
  modeling systems
• Hydrological models become integrated with
  other tools (GIS, statistical, economic,
  optimization, decision support tools, remote
  sensing)
• Models describe natural, as well as human
  influences on water flow and distribution
• Models describe water quality as well as quantity
Hydrometeorological data requirements
Rainfall, evapotranspiration, surface water levels, water table depth
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          2.0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          1.8




                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Water Level (m OD)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          1.6

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          1.4

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          1.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        SB e
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          1.0                                                           SB g
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        SB h
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          0.8




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      21/12/98



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 09/07/99



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             25/01/00



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          12/08/00
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                16/11/97



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           04/06/98
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    0.2


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    0.0
                                                             6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    -0.2
                                                             5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    -0.4




                                                                                                                                                                                                            Water Table Depth (m)
                         Potential Evapotranspiration (mm)




                                                             4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    -0.6
                                                             3
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    -0.8                                                                             1
                                                             2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    -1.0                                                                             9
                                                             1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     10
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    -1.2                                                                             11
                                                             0
                                                                                                         25/06/98


                                                                                                                               25/12/98




                                                                                                                                                                                                 25/06/00
                                                             25/06/97
                                                                        25/09/97
                                                                                   25/12/97
                                                                                              25/03/98


                                                                                                                    25/09/98


                                                                                                                                          25/03/99
                                                                                                                                                     25/06/99
                                                                                                                                                                25/09/99
                                                                                                                                                                           25/12/99
                                                                                                                                                                                      25/03/00




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    -1.4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     01/12/96 19/06/97 05/01/98 24/07/98 09/02/99 28/08/99 15/03/00 01/10/00 19/04
Hydrogeological data requirements
                                  • Sub-surface geology conceptual model
                                  • Geologic properties (Kx, Storage, etc)
                                  • Pumping rates
                                  • Boundary conditions




• Surficial geology
• Soil properties
• Vegetation properties (root depth, LAI, etc)
MIKE 11 Hydrology Data Requirements




                 • Detailed topography
                 • Channel cross sections
                 • Channel network
                 • Control structures
                 • Flow cond’s at boundaries
Steps in modeling
1.       Define purpose of modeling
2.       Determine model to use
3.       Setup model
4.       Calibrate model
5.       Apply model:
     •    Prediction
     •    Scenario analysis
     •    Optimization
Model setup/input
                       River network/Topography/Soils/Landuse


                            Precipitation, ET



                                       Non-point      Initial
                                       sources        conditions
                  Point
                  sources



Boundary
conditions        Geology,
                  soils
Model animation
MIKE BASIN

        balances




water    with       water
needs              availability
Setup of MIKE BASIN


                Diversion point          Ground
                                          water

                                                            Reservoir
                 Intake
                                           Water
 Irrigation                 Runoff
                                           supply
 area
              Return flow                                  Hydro-
                             Catchment                     power
                                             Flow target

 Irrigation      Intake
 area
MIKE SHE <-> MIKE BASIN
       MIKE SHE              MIKE BASIN

Detailed, physically    Simple, nodal based
based                   routing
For process, cause-     For water allocation
effect understanding
Focus on soil,          Focus on riverflow
groundwater processes
Constraints for modeling
• Insufficient data:
  – Not available, non-existing
  – Poor quality
  – Not accessible
• Models costly, complex, non-transparent,
  time-consuming
• No tradition for modeling
• No faith in models
Perspectives for modeling in the
                 CP
Project participants:
• Think modeling from the conception of a project
• Plan for data collection in coordination with modeling
• Modeling as an integrated part of the project
• Coordinate approaches across projects

Modellers:
• Provide capacity building and support to concrete
  projects
• Continue making models more user-friendly, flexible (in
  complexity, scale) and integrated

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Infiltration and runoff
Infiltration and runoffInfiltration and runoff
Infiltration and runoffMoudud Hasan
 
Rainfall Runoff Modelling on the Lower Tapi Basin using HEC-HMS
Rainfall Runoff Modelling on the Lower Tapi Basin using HEC-HMSRainfall Runoff Modelling on the Lower Tapi Basin using HEC-HMS
Rainfall Runoff Modelling on the Lower Tapi Basin using HEC-HMSAnkit Balyan MBA, B.Tech.
 
REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELING
REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELINGREMOTE SENSING DATA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELING
REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELINGShyam Mohan Chaudhary
 
Unit 3 INFILTRATION
Unit 3 INFILTRATIONUnit 3 INFILTRATION
Unit 3 INFILTRATIONParimal Jha
 
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATIONCOMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATIONAnurag Satpathi
 
identification of ground water potential zones using gis and remote sensing
identification of ground water potential zones using gis and remote sensingidentification of ground water potential zones using gis and remote sensing
identification of ground water potential zones using gis and remote sensingtp jayamohan
 
Application of RS and GIS in Groundwater Prospects Zonation
Application of RS and GIS in Groundwater Prospects ZonationApplication of RS and GIS in Groundwater Prospects Zonation
Application of RS and GIS in Groundwater Prospects ZonationVishwanath Awati
 
APPLICATIONS OF ARC SWAT MODEL FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING
APPLICATIONS OF ARC SWAT MODEL FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELLINGAPPLICATIONS OF ARC SWAT MODEL FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING
APPLICATIONS OF ARC SWAT MODEL FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELLINGAbhiram Kanigolla
 
Chapter 4 groundwater hydrology
Chapter 4 groundwater hydrologyChapter 4 groundwater hydrology
Chapter 4 groundwater hydrologyMohammed Salahat
 
Groundwater Management
Groundwater ManagementGroundwater Management
Groundwater ManagementSean Carroll
 

Tendances (20)

Infiltration and runoff
Infiltration and runoffInfiltration and runoff
Infiltration and runoff
 
Rainfall Runoff Modelling on the Lower Tapi Basin using HEC-HMS
Rainfall Runoff Modelling on the Lower Tapi Basin using HEC-HMSRainfall Runoff Modelling on the Lower Tapi Basin using HEC-HMS
Rainfall Runoff Modelling on the Lower Tapi Basin using HEC-HMS
 
REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELING
REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELINGREMOTE SENSING DATA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELING
REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELING
 
subsurface water
subsurface watersubsurface water
subsurface water
 
Unit 3 INFILTRATION
Unit 3 INFILTRATIONUnit 3 INFILTRATION
Unit 3 INFILTRATION
 
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATIONCOMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
 
Swat model
Swat model Swat model
Swat model
 
Stream flow measurement technique
Stream flow measurement techniqueStream flow measurement technique
Stream flow measurement technique
 
identification of ground water potential zones using gis and remote sensing
identification of ground water potential zones using gis and remote sensingidentification of ground water potential zones using gis and remote sensing
identification of ground water potential zones using gis and remote sensing
 
Groundwater Hydrology
Groundwater HydrologyGroundwater Hydrology
Groundwater Hydrology
 
Application of RS and GIS in Groundwater Prospects Zonation
Application of RS and GIS in Groundwater Prospects ZonationApplication of RS and GIS in Groundwater Prospects Zonation
Application of RS and GIS in Groundwater Prospects Zonation
 
APPLICATIONS OF ARC SWAT MODEL FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING
APPLICATIONS OF ARC SWAT MODEL FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELLINGAPPLICATIONS OF ARC SWAT MODEL FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING
APPLICATIONS OF ARC SWAT MODEL FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING
 
Evapotranspiration
EvapotranspirationEvapotranspiration
Evapotranspiration
 
Chapter 4 groundwater hydrology
Chapter 4 groundwater hydrologyChapter 4 groundwater hydrology
Chapter 4 groundwater hydrology
 
Hydrological modelling i5
Hydrological modelling i5Hydrological modelling i5
Hydrological modelling i5
 
Hydrological modelling
Hydrological modellingHydrological modelling
Hydrological modelling
 
Land use land cover impacts
Land use land cover impactsLand use land cover impacts
Land use land cover impacts
 
Groundwater Management
Groundwater ManagementGroundwater Management
Groundwater Management
 
Ground Water Hydrology
Ground Water HydrologyGround Water Hydrology
Ground Water Hydrology
 
Hydrology
HydrologyHydrology
Hydrology
 

En vedette

Which is the best model ?
Which is the best model ?Which is the best model ?
Which is the best model ?Riccardo Rigon
 
Interception and Depression Storage
Interception and Depression StorageInterception and Depression Storage
Interception and Depression StorageHannalee Perdez
 
Regression analysis
Regression analysisRegression analysis
Regression analysisSubin Raj
 
11.rainfall runoff modelling of a watershed
11.rainfall runoff modelling of a watershed11.rainfall runoff modelling of a watershed
11.rainfall runoff modelling of a watershedAlexander Decker
 
Modelling Concepts
Modelling ConceptsModelling Concepts
Modelling Conceptscurt_jawdy
 
RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELLING USING HEC-HMS
RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELLING                USING HEC-HMSRAINFALL RUNOFF MODELLING                USING HEC-HMS
RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELLING USING HEC-HMSPushp Aggarwal
 

En vedette (8)

Runoff final
Runoff finalRunoff final
Runoff final
 
Which is the best model ?
Which is the best model ?Which is the best model ?
Which is the best model ?
 
Ch4 surface runoff
Ch4 surface runoffCh4 surface runoff
Ch4 surface runoff
 
Interception and Depression Storage
Interception and Depression StorageInterception and Depression Storage
Interception and Depression Storage
 
Regression analysis
Regression analysisRegression analysis
Regression analysis
 
11.rainfall runoff modelling of a watershed
11.rainfall runoff modelling of a watershed11.rainfall runoff modelling of a watershed
11.rainfall runoff modelling of a watershed
 
Modelling Concepts
Modelling ConceptsModelling Concepts
Modelling Concepts
 
RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELLING USING HEC-HMS
RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELLING                USING HEC-HMSRAINFALL RUNOFF MODELLING                USING HEC-HMS
RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELLING USING HEC-HMS
 

Similaire à INTERCEPTION, DEPRESSION STORAGE AND INFILTRATION

Hydrologic cycle and field water balance
Hydrologic cycle and field water balance Hydrologic cycle and field water balance
Hydrologic cycle and field water balance dathan cs
 
Groundwater Hydrogeology
Groundwater Hydrogeology Groundwater Hydrogeology
Groundwater Hydrogeology Jyoti Khatiwada
 
What is the river discharge and what factors
What is the river discharge and what factorsWhat is the river discharge and what factors
What is the river discharge and what factorsMischa Knight
 
Hydrology and irrigation engineering cel 303
Hydrology and irrigation engineering   cel 303Hydrology and irrigation engineering   cel 303
Hydrology and irrigation engineering cel 303Gaurav Mittal
 
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY AS - HYDROLOGY AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; 1.1. DRAINAGE B...
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY AS - HYDROLOGY AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; 1.1. DRAINAGE B...CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY AS - HYDROLOGY AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; 1.1. DRAINAGE B...
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY AS - HYDROLOGY AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; 1.1. DRAINAGE B...George Dumitrache
 
Hydrology and Fluvial Geo morphology for CAMBRIDGE AS level
Hydrology and Fluvial Geo morphology for CAMBRIDGE AS level Hydrology and Fluvial Geo morphology for CAMBRIDGE AS level
Hydrology and Fluvial Geo morphology for CAMBRIDGE AS level Yonas Gemeda
 
The hydrologic cycle and water resource of world
The hydrologic cycle and water resource of worldThe hydrologic cycle and water resource of world
The hydrologic cycle and water resource of worldAdamas University
 
Hydrology_intro 1 by Getachew Tege@ACEWM
Hydrology_intro 1 by Getachew Tege@ACEWMHydrology_intro 1 by Getachew Tege@ACEWM
Hydrology_intro 1 by Getachew Tege@ACEWMgetachewtegegne21
 
Chapter 1 occurrence of groundwater
Chapter 1  occurrence of groundwaterChapter 1  occurrence of groundwater
Chapter 1 occurrence of groundwaterUsama Waly
 

Similaire à INTERCEPTION, DEPRESSION STORAGE AND INFILTRATION (20)

Runoff.pptx
Runoff.pptxRunoff.pptx
Runoff.pptx
 
Hydrology
HydrologyHydrology
Hydrology
 
4 runoff and floods
4 runoff and floods4 runoff and floods
4 runoff and floods
 
Hydrologic cycle and field water balance
Hydrologic cycle and field water balance Hydrologic cycle and field water balance
Hydrologic cycle and field water balance
 
Flooding
FloodingFlooding
Flooding
 
Ct 301 hydrology 5th
Ct 301 hydrology 5thCt 301 hydrology 5th
Ct 301 hydrology 5th
 
Hydrology
HydrologyHydrology
Hydrology
 
Groundwater Hydrogeology
Groundwater Hydrogeology Groundwater Hydrogeology
Groundwater Hydrogeology
 
Water education ppt
Water education pptWater education ppt
Water education ppt
 
What is the river discharge and what factors
What is the river discharge and what factorsWhat is the river discharge and what factors
What is the river discharge and what factors
 
Hydrology and irrigation engineering cel 303
Hydrology and irrigation engineering   cel 303Hydrology and irrigation engineering   cel 303
Hydrology and irrigation engineering cel 303
 
Surface water runoff
Surface water runoffSurface water runoff
Surface water runoff
 
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY AS - HYDROLOGY AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; 1.1. DRAINAGE B...
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY AS - HYDROLOGY AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; 1.1. DRAINAGE B...CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY AS - HYDROLOGY AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; 1.1. DRAINAGE B...
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY AS - HYDROLOGY AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; 1.1. DRAINAGE B...
 
Hydrology 1
Hydrology 1Hydrology 1
Hydrology 1
 
Hydrology
HydrologyHydrology
Hydrology
 
Hydrology and Fluvial Geo morphology for CAMBRIDGE AS level
Hydrology and Fluvial Geo morphology for CAMBRIDGE AS level Hydrology and Fluvial Geo morphology for CAMBRIDGE AS level
Hydrology and Fluvial Geo morphology for CAMBRIDGE AS level
 
The hydrologic cycle and water resource of world
The hydrologic cycle and water resource of worldThe hydrologic cycle and water resource of world
The hydrologic cycle and water resource of world
 
Hydrology_intro 1 by Getachew Tege@ACEWM
Hydrology_intro 1 by Getachew Tege@ACEWMHydrology_intro 1 by Getachew Tege@ACEWM
Hydrology_intro 1 by Getachew Tege@ACEWM
 
The Hydrological Cycle
The Hydrological  CycleThe Hydrological  Cycle
The Hydrological Cycle
 
Chapter 1 occurrence of groundwater
Chapter 1  occurrence of groundwaterChapter 1  occurrence of groundwater
Chapter 1 occurrence of groundwater
 

Dernier

New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024Lorenzo Miniero
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024Lonnie McRorey
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersRaghuram Pandurangan
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Commit University
 
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demoSample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demoHarshalMandlekar2
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr BaganFwdays
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteTake control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteDianaGray10
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Mark Simos
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek SchlawackFwdays
 
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.Curtis Poe
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebUiPathCommunity
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Training state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embeddingTraining state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embeddingZilliz
 

Dernier (20)

New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
 
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demoSample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demo
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteTake control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
 
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Training state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embeddingTraining state-of-the-art general text embedding
Training state-of-the-art general text embedding
 

INTERCEPTION, DEPRESSION STORAGE AND INFILTRATION

  • 2. Interception – loss of rainfall due to vegetation (from trees to grass) rainfall throughfall stemflow Interception = f (vegetation (age, density, type), season, rain intensity, antecedent conditions) Forest cover data collected by placing rain gauges under forest canopy and comparing with gauge data from open area.
  • 3. Factors affecting interception • Storm characteristics The number and spacing of precipitation events, intensity and amount of precipitation Wind speed • Vegetation characteristics Species, age, density, and condition of vegetation
  • 4. Estimation of interception Li = Si + KEt Li = volume of water intercepted (inches) Si = interception storage that will be retained on the foliage, (0.01 to 0.05 in) f (wind, gravity, type) K = ration of surface area of intercepting leaves to horizontal projection of tree area, Light storms K = 100% Heavy storms K = 10 to 40 % E = amount of water evaporating per hour during precipitation (in/hr) t = time, hrs
  • 5. DEPRESSION STORAGE • Depression storage, or ponding, is that water on a drainage a drainage basin that drains into closed depressions and never reaches the outlet of the basin. • This water becomes trapped in ponds; some eventually evaporates and the remainder infiltrates into the ground. • Depression storage occurs on most basins.
  • 6. INFILTRATION • Infiltration is the vertical movement of water through the soil surface. • Similar terminology: percolation into the soil seepage out of the soil
  • 7. Factors influencing infiltration: • condition of soil surface and vegetative cover • soil properties (moisture content, porosity, hydraulic conductivity) • antecedent moisture conditions • rainfall intensity
  • 8. • Infiltration is highly related to soil properties. • Our ability to physically represent the infiltration process is related to being able to represent soil properties. • However, soils exhibit a great deal of variability spatially and vertically. • Thus our representations generalize over a large variability of soil characteristics
  • 9. Process of infiltration, Moisture content soil moisture description Soil water zone – max depth from which water can be returned to surface through Saturated zone capillary action or ET. Transmission zone, Gravitational water – flow direction uniform moisture is vertical due to gravity. content, not saturated (unsaturated zone or zone of aeration) Capillary zone, less than atmospheric pressure Wetting front Groundwater, saturation at atmospheric pressure
  • 10. Moisture Content: Total volume = air volume (voids) + solid volume η, porosity = volume of voids ÷ total volume θ, soil moisture content = volume water ÷ total volume maximum θ = η
  • 11. Measurement: Initial efforts to describe infiltration are based on measured data. Split (double) ring infiltrometer • shown to represent Horton parameters fairly well. • Measure rate of vertical movement from center ring • Exterior ring to offset lateral movement of moisture • Change in elevation measured at selected time intervals (commonly use a point gauge). • Actually measures maximum infiltration capacity because excess water is available. 35 cm 23 cm
  • 12. Sprinkler infiltrometer catch and measure runoff rate infiltration rate = “rainfall” rate - runoff rate12’6’ usually have high application rate therefore approaching maximum infiltration rate
  • 14. RUNOFF Runoff or overland flow will occur if the amount of water falling on the ground is greater than the infiltration rate of the surface,. Runoff specifically refers to the water leaving an area of drainage and flowing across the land surface to points of lower elevation. It is not the water flowing beneath the surface of the ground. This type of water flow is called throughflow.
  • 15. Runoff involves the following events: • Rainfall intensity exceeds the soil's infiltration rate. • A thin water layer forms that begins to move because of the influence of slope and gravity. • Flowing water accumulates in depressions. • Depressions overflow and form small rills. • Rills merge to form larger streams and rivers. • Streams and rivers then flow into lakes or oceans.
  • 16. Runoff on a global scale • Surface runoff sends 7 % of the land based precipitation back to the ocean to balance the processes of evaporation and precipitation. Continent Runoff Per Unit Area (mm per yr.) Europe 300 Asia 286 Africa 136 North and Central America 265 South America 445 Australia, N.Zealand and New 218 Guinea Antarctica and Greenland 165
  • 17. Streamflow and Stream Discharge • The term streamflow describes the process of water flowing in the organized channels of a stream or river. • Stream discharge represents the volume of water passing through a river channel during a certain period of time. • Stream discharge can be expressed mathematically with the following equation: Q=WxDxV – where, – Q equals stream discharge usually measured in cubic meters per second, W equals channel width, D equals channel depth, and V equals velocity of flowing water.
  • 18. Stream hydrograph • Because of streamflow's potential hazard to humans many streams are gauged by mechanical recorders. These instruments record the stream's discharge on a hydrograph.
  • 19. From this graph we can observe the following things: A small blip caused by rain falling directly into the channel is the first evidence that stream discharge is changing because of the rainfall. A significant time interval occurs between the start of rain and the beginning of the main rise in discharge on the hydrograph. This lag occurs because of the time required for the precipitation that falls in the stream's basin to eventually reach the recording station. Usually, the larger the basin the greater the the time lag. The rapid movement of surface runoff into the stream's channels and subsequent flow causes the discharge to rise quickly. The falling limb of the hydrograph tends to be less steep that the rise. This flow represents the water added from distant tributaries and from throughflow that occurs in surface soils and sediments. After some time the hydrograph settles at a constant level known as base flow stage. Most of the base flow comes from groundwater flow which moves water into the stream channel very slowly.
  • 20. the shape and magnitude of the hydrograph is controlled by two sets of factors: Permanent Factors - slope of basin, soil structure, vegetation, channel density, etc. Transient Factors - are those factors associated with precipitation input - size of storm, intensity, duration of rainfall, etc.
  • 21. Runoff Models Historical Perspective The development and application of hydrological models have gone through a long time period, the remarkable dates in the history of the development of hydrological models are: The origins of rainfall-runoff modelling in the broad sense can be found in the middle of the 19th century, when Mulvaney (1850), an Irish engineer who used in the first time the rational equation to give the peak flow Qp as: Qp = CiA Where, C is the coefficient of runoff (dependent on catchment characteristics) i is the intensity of rainfall in time Tc and A is the area of catchment. Tc is the time of concentration, the time required for rain falling at the farthest point of the catchment to flow to the measuring point of the river.
  • 22. A major step forward in hydrological analysis was the concept of the unit hydrograph introduced by the American engineer Sherman in 1932 on the basis of superposition principle. The use of unit hydrograph made it possible to calculate not only the flood peak discharge (as the rational method does) but also the whole hydrograph (the volume of surface runoff produced by the rainfall event). The real breakthrough came in the 1950s (Todini, 1988) when hydrologists became aware of system engineering approaches used for the analysis of complex dynamic systems. This was the period when conceptual linear models originated (Nash, 1958, 1960). Many other approaches to rainfall-runoff modelling were considered in the 1960s. A large number of conceptual, lumped, rainfall-runoff models appeared thereafter including the famous Stanford Model IV (Crawford and Linsley, 1966) and the HBV model (Bergström and Forsman, 1973). Stochastic time series models were first introduced by Box and Jenkins (1970) which provided hydrologists with an alternative model type.
  • 23. One remarkable model developed in the late 1970s is the TOPMODEL (Beven and Kirkby, 1979) that is based on the idea that topography exerts a dominant control on flow routing through upland catchments is called. To meet the need of forecasting (1) the effects of land-use changes, (2) the effects of spatially variable inputs and outputs, (3) the movements of pollutants and sediments, and (4) the hydrological response of ungauged catchments where no data are available for calibration of a lumped model, the physically-based distributed-parameter models were developed. The Systéme Hydrologique Européen (SHE) model is a excellent example of such models (Abbott et al., 1986).
  • 24. The macro-scale hydrological models were developed on the basis of the following motivations. 1. First, for a variety of operational and planning purposes, water resource managers responsible for large regions need to estimate the spatial variability of resources over large areas, at a spatial resolution finer than can be provided by observed data alone. 2. Second, hydrologists and water managers are interested in the effects of land-use and climate variability and change over a large geographic domain. 3. Third, there is an increasing need of using hydrologic models as a base to estimate point and non-point sources of pollution loading to streams. 4. Fourth, hydrologists and atmospheric modellers have perceived weaknesses in the representation of hydrological processes in regional and global atmospheric models. 5. Examples of GIS supported macro-scale hydrological models include those developed by Vörösmarty et al. (1989), the VIC model (Wood et al., 1992) and the Macro-PDM (Arnell, 1999). These models are state-of-the- art tools in assessing regional and continental scale water resources.
  • 25. Applications of hydrologic models Nowadays, mathematical models have taken over the most important tasks in problem solving in hydrology. The important applications of hydrological model are summarised below: Design Operation Dams and reservoirs Flow forecasting design Reservoir control water yield Urban storm drain control capacity, failure Management Floods Land-use changes frequency Climate changes mapping Point/nonpoint pollution Urbanisation Groundwater recharge storm drains Research and teaching flood plains University training channel alterations Industrial training Irrigation and drainage Research
  • 26. Runoff models are probably what most hydrologists spontaneously refer to when discussing hydrological models. This was also the first branch in which models were used when computers became easily available in the 1970s. The basic principle in hydrological modelling is that the model is used to calculate river flow based on meteorological data, which are available in a basin or in its vicinity. Hydrological models include subroutines for the most significant hydrological processes, such as snow accumulation and melt at different elevations, soil moisture dynamics, evapotranspiration,recharge of groundwater, runoff generation and routing in lakes and rivers. Most runoff models are based on the water balance, using precipitation as a driving variable and calculating the quantities directed as runoff, R, from the water balance equation, R = P – E – DS, where P is precipitation, E evapotranspiration, and DS represents various storage terms.
  • 27. Runoff and Hydrologic Modeling (RS) Runoff cannot be directly measured by remote sensing techniques. However, there are two general areas where remote sensing can be used in hydrologic and runoff modeling: 4. determining watershed geometry, drainage network, and other map-type information for distributed hydrologic models and for empirical flood peak, annual runoff or low flow equations; and 5. providing input data such as soil moisture or delineated land use classes that are used to define runoff coefficients
  • 28. • Remote sensing data can be used to obtain almost any information that is typically obtained from maps or aerial photography. • In many regions of the world, remotely sensed data, and particularly Landsat, Thematic Mapper (TM) or Systeme Probatoire, d'Observation de la Terre (SPOT) data, are the only source of good cartographic information. • Drainage basin areas and the stream network are easily obtained from good imagery, even in remote regions • Topography is a basic need for any hydrologic analysis and modeling. • Remote sensing can provide quantitative topographic information of suitable spatial resolution to be extremely valuable for model inputs. for example, stereo SPOT imagery can be used to develop a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) with 10 m horizontal resolution and vertical resolution approaching 5 m in ideal cases
  • 29. • Empirical flood formulae are useful for making quick estimates of peak flow when there is very little other information available. • Generally these equations are restricted in application to the size range of the basin and the climatic/hydrologic region of the world in which they were developed. • Most of the empirical flood formulae relate peak discharge to the drainage area of the basin. • Landsat data have been used to improve empirical regression equations of various runoff characteristics
  • 30. MIKE BASIN - MIKE 11's rainfall-runoff model NAM • Given rainfall and evaporation data, NAM calculates a runoff time series that is automatically assigned to MIKE BASIN for use in the river flow simulation. • NAM is a lumped, conceptual rainfall-runoff model simulating overland flow, interflow and baseflow as a function of the moisture content in each of four mutually interrelated storages: • Snow storage • Surface storage • Root zone storage
  • 31.
  • 32. MIKE 11 is a comprehensive, one-dimensional modelling system for the simulation of flows, sediment transport and water quality in estuaries, rivers, irrigation systems and other water bodies. It is a 4th generation modelling package designed for microcomputers with DOS or UNIX operating systems and provides the user with an efficient interactive menu and graphical support system with logical and systematic layouts and sequencing in the menus. The package was introduced in 1989 and today the number of installations world-wide exceeds 300. The hydrodynamic module of MIKE 11 is based on the complete partial differential equations of open channel flow (Saint Venant). The equations are solved by implicit, finite difference techniques. The formulations can be applied to branched and looped networks and quasi two- dimensional flow simulations on floodplains. MIKE 11 operates on the basis of information about the river and the floodplain topography, including man- made hydraulic structures such as embankments, weirs, gates, dredging schemes and flood retention basins. The hydrodynamic module forms the basis for morphological and water quality studies by means of add-on modules.
  • 33. MIKE21 is a comprehensive modelling system for 2-dimensional free surface flows applicable to studies of lakes, reservoirs, estuaries, bays, coastal areas and seas where stratification can be neglected. MIKE21 solves the vertically integrated equations of continuity and conservation of momentum in two horizontal dimensions. Like MIKE11, MIKE21 has a modular structure where water quality modules and sediment transport modules are available as add-on modules to the MIKE21 hydrodynamic module.
  • 34. Integrated Hydrological Modeling MIKE 3 MIKE SWMM MIKE SHE
  • 35. An Integrated Hydrological Model Traditional Models Integrated Model Evapotrans- piration Unsaturated zone Unsaturated Evapotrans- zone piration Groundwater flow Groundwater Surface Water/ Surface Water/ flow Overland flow Overland flow
  • 36. MIKE SHE – An example of an integrated model Overland flow Unsaturated zone Surface water Groundwater flow
  • 37. Why not one model? MIKE 3 MIKE SWMM
  • 38. Different models offer MIKE FLOOD solutions to various problems, MIKE BASIN MIKE SHE with different approach/focus/ MIKE 21 MIKE 11 level of detail Flood forecasting, flood management Dam break analysis Reservoir operation River management, navigation Sediment transport, river morphology River water quality River ecology Groundwater & surface water interaction Wetlands Basin-wide water resources planning Soil & groundwater contamination Watershed management Irrigation, canal operation
  • 39. MIKE SHE Application Areas • River Basin planning, water use/allocation • Irrigation and drainage • Wetland protection, restoration and ecology • Impacts of farming practices • Soil and water management • Effects of changes in land use • Effects of changes in climate • Contamination from waste disposal sites • Saline related problems (not released yet)
  • 40. MIKE SHE Flexible Process Descriptions Processes can be mixed as required Processes run on different spatial scales Processes run on different time scales
  • 41. MIKE SHE MIKE SHE has been used in hundreds of consulting and research projects around the world
  • 43. Trends in hydrological modeling • Models → modules in integrated, flexible modeling systems • Hydrological models become integrated with other tools (GIS, statistical, economic, optimization, decision support tools, remote sensing) • Models describe natural, as well as human influences on water flow and distribution • Models describe water quality as well as quantity
  • 44. Hydrometeorological data requirements Rainfall, evapotranspiration, surface water levels, water table depth 2.0 1.8 Water Level (m OD) 1.6 1.4 1.2 SB e 1.0 SB g SB h 0.8 21/12/98 09/07/99 25/01/00 12/08/00 16/11/97 04/06/98 0.2 0.0 6 -0.2 5 -0.4 Water Table Depth (m) Potential Evapotranspiration (mm) 4 -0.6 3 -0.8 1 2 2 -1.0 9 1 10 -1.2 11 0 25/06/98 25/12/98 25/06/00 25/06/97 25/09/97 25/12/97 25/03/98 25/09/98 25/03/99 25/06/99 25/09/99 25/12/99 25/03/00 -1.4 01/12/96 19/06/97 05/01/98 24/07/98 09/02/99 28/08/99 15/03/00 01/10/00 19/04
  • 45. Hydrogeological data requirements • Sub-surface geology conceptual model • Geologic properties (Kx, Storage, etc) • Pumping rates • Boundary conditions • Surficial geology • Soil properties • Vegetation properties (root depth, LAI, etc)
  • 46. MIKE 11 Hydrology Data Requirements • Detailed topography • Channel cross sections • Channel network • Control structures • Flow cond’s at boundaries
  • 47. Steps in modeling 1. Define purpose of modeling 2. Determine model to use 3. Setup model 4. Calibrate model 5. Apply model: • Prediction • Scenario analysis • Optimization
  • 48. Model setup/input River network/Topography/Soils/Landuse Precipitation, ET Non-point Initial sources conditions Point sources Boundary conditions Geology, soils
  • 50. MIKE BASIN balances water with water needs availability
  • 51. Setup of MIKE BASIN Diversion point Ground water Reservoir Intake Water Irrigation Runoff supply area Return flow Hydro- Catchment power Flow target Irrigation Intake area
  • 52. MIKE SHE <-> MIKE BASIN MIKE SHE MIKE BASIN Detailed, physically Simple, nodal based based routing For process, cause- For water allocation effect understanding Focus on soil, Focus on riverflow groundwater processes
  • 53. Constraints for modeling • Insufficient data: – Not available, non-existing – Poor quality – Not accessible • Models costly, complex, non-transparent, time-consuming • No tradition for modeling • No faith in models
  • 54. Perspectives for modeling in the CP Project participants: • Think modeling from the conception of a project • Plan for data collection in coordination with modeling • Modeling as an integrated part of the project • Coordinate approaches across projects Modellers: • Provide capacity building and support to concrete projects • Continue making models more user-friendly, flexible (in complexity, scale) and integrated

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. UK Wet Grasslands / Grazing Marsh Grazing marshes, flood meadows, man-made washlands and water meadows. Subject to periodic, but not continuous, flooding and year-round high water tables. Found in river valleys, areas of impeded drainage and behind sea defences. Few are wholly natural since most have been created or strongly influenced by human activities such as forest clearance and the drainage of bogs and other wetlands – in particular salt marshes in the case of coastal lowland wet grassland. Traditionally extensive or low-intensity agricultural practices associated with grazing and cutting of hay. In lowland areas within the UK, where wildlife habitat is often limited, wet grasslands provide valuable habitat for plants, invertebrates and birds – e.g. water soldier, lapwing, redshank, golden plover and the fen raft spider.
  2. Long-Term Hydrometeorological Instrumentation Over 10 nest of piezometers Stage boards and automatic water level recorders (AWLR) Automatic weather station (Precipitation and evapotranspiration) Micro-meteorological stations Supported by other field investigations Soil hydrology Topographic surveys
  3. Long-Term Hydrometeorological Instrumentation Over 10 nest of piezometers Stage boards and automatic water level recorders (AWLR) Automatic weather station (Precipitation and evapotranspiration) Micro-meteorological stations Supported by other field investigations Soil hydrology Topographic surveys
  4. River Model Ditch network derived from Ordnance Survey Maps Ditch Cross Sections Derived from field surveys and literature on characteristic wet grassland drainage systems Control Structures Eight in total: Five at the downstream ends of ditches Three within the marshes Simulated as weirs Elevation set to mean field level as undertaken by ECT