SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  13
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
JOURNAL OF HERITAGE TOURISM
                                 ARTICLE ID: HT 059

                 TO: CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

       AUTHOR QUERIES - TO BE ANSWERED BY THE AUTHOR

The following queries have arisen during the typesetting of your manuscript. Please answer
these queries.

  Q1            Bandarin, 2001 in text but Bandarine, 2002 in Reference list


  Q2            Chandler et al. (2002) not in Reference list.


  Q3            UNESCO (1972) not in Reference list.


  Q4            Where are these references cited in text?


  Q5            Please give full postal address (street, zip code) for
                Correspondence.
The Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of
World Heritage Listings: A Case Study of
Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun in
Southern Anhui, China
Cheng (Grace) Yan
Department of Recreation, Sports and Tourism, University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
Alastair M. Morrison
Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Purdue
University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

This research used Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun in southern Anhui (China) as a
case to study the impact of World Heritage List (WHL) status on international visi-
tors. The study categorised all the visitors into two types – WHL aware and WHL
unaware – based on awareness levels of the World Heritage status of the destina-
tion. The two groups were compared in terms of visit purposes, socio-demographics
and other characteristics. The results showed that the World Heritage List status did
have an impact on travellers’ visit decisions. Additionally, the World Heritage List
status proved to be related to tourists’ visit purposes, activity patterns and socio-
demographic characteristics. However, the World Heritage List status will be a more
influential tool for destinations when marketers place emphasis on the underlying
cultural contents of sites and make the cultural elements accessible and interpreta-
ble for international visitors.

Keywords: China, heritage tourism, Mount Huangshan, World Heritage List status



Introduction
   Mount Huangshan lies in the south of Anhui Province, China. the property
extends over a core area of 15,400 hectares. uNesCo inscribed Huangshan on
its World Heritage List in 1990. Huangshan occupies a central spot in China’s
artistic, cultural and environmental heritage. Huangshan, known as ‘the
loveliest mountain of China’ (uNesCo, 1990), has been acclaimed through art
and literature during a good part of Chinese history. today, Huangshan holds
the same fascination for visitors for its magnificent scenery of granite peaks and
rocks emerging out of a sea of clouds.
   According to uNesCo’s definition, World Heritage sites (WHs) could be
basically categorised into three types: natural, cultural and mixed (mixed being
cultural and natural heritage). While Mount Huangshan was placed under the
category of mixed heritage, uNesCo placed the ancient villages of Xidi and
Hongcun under the category of cultural heritage on World Heritage List in
2000. the two villages are located quite close to Mount Huangshan and are
graphic illustrations of a type of human settlement created during a feudal
1743-873X/07/03 001-012 $20.00/0                       © 2007 C.G. Yan & A.M. Morrison
HeritAGe tourisM                                                      Vol. 2, No. 3, 2007
Journal of Heritage Tourism

period and based on a prosperous trading economy – the Huizhou period. the
patterns of buildings and streets in these two ancient villages reflect the socio-
economic structure of a long-lived and settled period of Chinese history
(uNesCo, 2000). Blood ties linked the inhabitants living in the two villages.
traditional customs are maintained, and there is a high degree of social stabil-
ity. the ancient villages of Anhui are among the most characteristic examples of
traditional Chinese villages. they are usually located at the base of a mountain,
alongside rivers or lakes; they have regular spatial layouts of quiet, narrow
alleys and picturesque gardens at the mouths of rivers. the architecture is
simple, yet elegant, with unique forms of gables, delicate carvings and orna-
mentation and elegant interior furnishings.
   the regional culture of southern Anhui is called ‘Huizhou Culture’, an ancient
culture dating to around 600 BC. it reached its apogee in the 14th–19th centuries,
when Anhui had a dominant influence in various aspects of Chinese culture,
such as arts, architecture, culinary arts, music and the influential Cheng Zu
(an ancient Chinese emperor) philosophy, which is an interpretation of
Confucianism. the ‘Huizhou’ culture has a broad geographic scope including
Mount Huangshan and Xidi and Hongcun. the two villages of Xidi and
Hongcun particularly retain in material form many elements of this important
Chinese culture. However, all historic cultures have been more or less eroded
as a result of social development and modernisation. in the mountain areas of
southern Anhui, family and blood ties are loosening and the influence of
Huizhou culture is gradually diminishing. Xidi and Hongcun are two of the
few surviving villages that have not undergone radical changes.
   the number of international visitors to these sites has been increasing dra-
matically, from 2,205,000 in 2000 to 3,256,000 in 2004 (including taiwan, Hong
Kong and Macao). Local tourism administrators and tourism enterprises are
making great efforts to market cultural heritage tourism products, especially to
international visitors. However, there is no available research focusing on the
World Heritage status of the three places and the impact of this status on inter-
national visitations in Xidi, Hongcun and Huangshan.

Literature Review
   Properties selected for inscription on the World Heritage List are considered the
foremost natural and cultural wonders of the world. such is the significance of
World Heritage status that WHs have been described as ‘magnets for visitors’ and
World Heritage designation ‘virtually a guarantee that visitor numbers will
increase’ (shackley, 1998). Bandarin (2001) stated that it is an inevitable destiny       Q1
that the very reasons a property is chosen for inscription on the World Heritage
List are also the reasons millions of tourists visit these sites. Although it is often
suggested that World Heritage status increases the popularity of a location or
destination, Hall and Piggin (2001) found that the link between the WHs status
and increased visitation above existing tourism trends is somewhat tenuous. they
also suggested that the intrinsic qualities of the place itself might be a major factor
in tourist visitation to the area, with World Heritage status having only a marginal
effect on visitor numbers or relative attractiveness (Hall  Piggin, 2002).
   since the inception of the World Heritage List, there have been considerable
discussions about issues such as the conservation of World Heritage sites, the
Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings                     

   management of the sites and the educational benefits brought by tourism to
   heritage sites. Although these complexities have invoked discussions in both
   the academic and popular literature, little empirical analysis has been done on
   the tourism marketing and promotion of WHs (Hall  Piggin, 2002). the under-
   lying relationship between the World Heritage List and tourism was made
   explicit by uNesCo itself in 1976, which described tourism as ‘more than an
   economic phenomenon with social and cultural effects, has become a
   phenomenon of civilization’ (uNesCo). it was suggested that the profits
   generated by tourism activities would improve the preservation of such sites,
   create new jobs, better educate local people and promote greater public aware-
   ness of the sites’ cultural or natural values, thereby increasing the chances of
   future preservation (Nicholls  Vogt, 2004). At many WHs, developing tourism
   is the only alternative to overcome current poor economic situations. Despite
   this, Hall and Piggin (2002) found the majority of affected tourism businesses in
   New Zealand were not capitalising on their proximity to WHs in their promo-
   tions. therefore, what roles should World Heritage listings actually play for
   destinations in attracting visitors? in addition, there also seems to be a substan-
   tial gap between the knowledge on the interplay of the intrinsic qualities of
   WHs and the associated values among visitors. What does a World Heritage
   listing mean to visitors and how important is this as a travel motivation?
      Many studies have found that heritage tourists tend to have distinctive socio-
   demographic characteristics compared with other travellers. Light et al. (1994)
   described heritage tourists as being middle class, well educated, middle aged,
   with no children, on holiday away from home and having a prior knowledge of
   history. Previous research has also revealed that heritage tourists tend to stay
   longer (4.7 vs. 3.3 nights), spend more money per trip ($615 vs. $425) and have
   higher average annual incomes ($42,133 vs. $41,455) (Kerstetter et al., 2001).
Q2 Chandler et al. (2002) showed heritage tourists made more frequent use of travel
   information sources such as visitor centers, maps, highway signs, brochures
   and pamphlets. However, there is little available research on the linkage
   between the appreciation of WHs and visitors’ socio-demographic characteris-
   tics and activity patterns. For example, are there significant socio-demographic
   differences between visitors who are fully aware of the importance of World
   Heritage listing and visitors who have no such knowledge? Moreover, do the
   visitors with World Heritage awareness tend to participate in more heritage-
   and cultural-related activities within a destination?

    Research Objectives
      the main research objectives of this study were two-fold. the first was to
    determine the influence of the World Heritage status of Huangshan, Xidi and
    Hongcun on international visitors’ travel decisions. the second was to compare
    the trip characteristics, socio-demographic profiles and activity preferences
    among international visitors according to awareness levels of these World
    Heritage listings. Five specific research objectives were identified:
    (1) to explore the awareness levels of World Heritage listings for Huangshan,
        Xidi and Hongcun among international visitors and then to divide them
        into two awareness groups – ’aware’ and ‘unaware’.
Journal of Heritage Tourism

(2) to investigate the relationship between visitors’ awareness of the World
    Heritage List status and their decisions to come to this part of southern
    Anhui.
(3) to study the relationship between the knowledge of the World Heritage
    status and tourists’ visit purposes.
(4) to profile these two groups of visitors and compare them in terms of socio-
    demographic and trip characteristics.
(5) to analyse the association of awareness levels and activity patterns of the
    two groups of international visitors.


Methods
   the study used data from the International Visitor Survey for Huangshan, Xidi 
and Hongcun in 2005. interviews were conducted in Huangshan international
Airport, Huangshan train station and local hotels with departing international
visitors from 2 July to 30 July. A total of 879 interviews were completed and the
respondents came from 41 different countries. the research utilised sPss to
analyse the data.
   the data were first segregated into travel parties who were aware of the
destinations’ World Heritage List status and those unaware by using the
survey question, ‘Did you know Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun were placed
on uNesCo’s World Heritage List before you came?’ Visitors who gave an
affirmative answer were identified as belonging to the first group. then, this
group of visitors was also asked to indicate the degree of the influence of the
destinations’ World Heritage List status had on their visit decisions from
‘significantly’ to ‘somewhat’ to ‘not at all’. in that way, they were categorised
into three groups labelled as ‘significantly influenced’, ‘somewhat influenced’
and ‘not influenced’, respectively. Furthermore, the study combined the
‘significantly influenced’ and ‘somewhat influenced’ into one group ‘influ-
enced’ to compare with a ‘not influenced’ group. Later, logistic regression
analysis was employed to explore the relationship between the awareness
of the prestige of the destination’s World Heritage status and its influence on
people’s visit decisions.
   in the interviews, respondents were asked to identify the tourism activities
they participated in during their visits. Chi-square tests were used to compare
the activity participation patterns between the different groups. those who
participated in culture and heritage related activities were also asked to give
their satisfaction evaluations by choosing a number from 1 to 5, where 1 meant
poor and 5 was excellent. to investigate satisfaction levels with tourism activi-
ties, ANoVA tests compared the mean scores of different groups. Chi-square
tests were used to detect significant differences in the socio-demographic and
trip characteristics of the groups.

Findings
The influence of World Heritage status on visitors’ decisions to come
to Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun
  Among respondents who answered the particular question (n 5 685, 77.9%),
some 285 (41.6%) visitors were aware of the World Heritage listings, and 400
Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings                        

(58.4%) were unaware of them. Within the ‘aware’ group, 200 (67.1%) were
influenced by the message that Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun were listed as
WHs. these figures indicated that the knowledge of World Heritage listing had
a moderate effect, rather than a dramatic one on visitors’ decisions. this was
further illustrated in that 45% of the ‘aware’ visitors said that this knowledge
‘somewhat’ influenced their decision in making the trips, while only 22%
responded that the knowledge had a significant impact.
   A simple linear regression formula was developed to measure the influence
degree brought by the destinations’ World Heritage List status among interna-
tional visitors:
                    Y(influence) = 0.774-1.025*X(awarencess)
   independent variable ‘X’ had two possible values and they were ‘0’ and ‘1’.
the value ‘0’ designated ‘awareness’ and ‘1’ was ‘no awareness’. When X
equalled 0, dependent variable Y turned out to be 0.774; when X equalled 1, Y
became -0.251 correspondingly. to interpret the two results, it should also be
noted that ‘Y 5 1’ means ‘being influenced’ and subsequently, ‘Y 5 0’ is the
same with ‘not being influenced’. this regression formula was examined by
ANoVA test, and both the intercept ( p 5 0.000) and the slope ( p 5 0.049)
proved to be significant.
   this model had dual meanings. First, tourists’ visit decisions were positively
influenced by the knowledge of the destinations’ World Heritage status. that
could be explained by the Y value increasing with X went from ‘no awareness’
to ‘awareness’. second, despite the two being positively related, the influence of
the knowledge was rather subtle. even for people who recognised the World
Heritage status of the destinations, the influence level on their visit decisions
was less than ‘1’. the perception of WHs did not have a large impact on visitors’
decision-making processes.

World Heritage List status and tourists’ visit purposes
  in terms of specific visit purposes, respondents were found to be significantly
different in ‘Huizhou culture and heritage’ ( p 5 0.000).
  Although the overall level of visiting for the primary purpose of Huizhou
culture and heritage was low, the connection between being aware of the
destinations’ World Heritage listing and being interested in participating in
local culture and heritage tourism activities was quite salient. the WHs aware
visitors were more likely to have the purpose of participating in Huizhou
culture and heritage activities than the WHs unaware group (20.1% versus
10.5%) (see table 1).
  Conversely, the WHs unaware group had stronger motivation to climb Mount
Huangshan. the p-value for the difference between the two groups was 0.57,
which was close to being a significant value at the level of α 5 0.05 (see table 2).

World Heritage List status and tourism activities
   the visitors with knowledge about the destinations’ World Heritage List
status were found to be more likely to participate in local folklore cultural activi-
ties ( p 5 0.006). However, the two groups of visitors displayed very similar
satisfaction levels with this particular type of tourism activity. the WHs
Journal of Heritage Tourism

Table 1 Knowledge of World Heritage List status and Huizhou culture and heritage

    Heritage purpose                                          Knowledge of WHL

                                                          Not aware        Aware

    No                 Count                                   357          226

                       % Within purpose of heritage            61.2         38.8

                       % Within knowledge of WHL               89.5         79.9

                       % of total                              52.3         33.1

    Yes                Count                                   42           57

                       % Within purpose of heritage            42.4         57.6

                       % Within knowledge of WHL               10.5         20.1

                       % of total                               6.2            8.4

    total              Count                                   399          283


Table 2 Knowledge of World Heritage List status and climbing Mt Huangshan

    Climbing                                             Knowledge of WHL
    Huangshan
                                                      Not aware          Aware

    No            Count                                 67                64

                  % Within purpose ofclimbing           51.1              48.9

                  % Within knowledge of WHL             16.8              22.6

                  % of total                             9.8                9.4

    Yes           Count                                 332               219

                  % Within purpose of climbing          60.3              39.7

                  % Within knowledge of WHL             83.2              77.4


unaware group even had a slightly higher mean score of 3.28 compared to the
WHs aware group’s mean value 3.18. this result showed that there was not a
positive relationship between participation in folklore cultural activities and
satisfaction levels among the visitors. this leads to some intriguing questions.
the knowledge of World Heritage status definitely seemed to attract people to
get involved in the local folklore cultural activities that could be considered
representative of Huizhou culture and heritage. But did those who were aware
of the great reputations of WHs have higher expectations, and the real experi-
ences failed to reach their ‘idealised’ standards? in that sense, was the World
Heritage status really a helpful tool in facilitating local heritage tourism devel-
opment? According to Kotler et al. (2005), ‘customer satisfaction depends on a
Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings                         

product’s perceived performance in delivering value relative to a buyer’s expec-
tations. if the product’s performance falls short of the customer’s expectations,
the buyer is dissatisfied’. if the buyers are not satisfied, they may not make the
same purchasing choice again. therefore, the first-time visitors to Huangshan,
Xidi and Hongcun are less likely to become repeat visitors if their expectations
are not met.
   A similar situation was found for ‘visiting historical ancient buildings’ and
‘appreciating traditional Chinese calligraphies and paintings’. in these two
cases, ‘not influenced’ visitors had higher satisfaction scores than ‘influenced’
visitors. the significant level for the two group of visitors for ‘visiting historical
ancient buildings’ was 0.005 with the mean score of the ‘influenced’ group being
3.70 and the ‘not influenced’ being 4.12. As for ‘appreciating traditional Chinese
calligraphies and paintings’, the p-value was 0.006 and the two means were 3.56
and 4.08, respectively. Again, the results cast doubt on the role that World
Heritage listing actually played in heritage tourists’ visits if they could not have
satisfactory experiences.

Socio-demographic characteristics of visitors
   Visitors who were knowledgeable of the destination’s World Heritage status
were found to be significantly different in terms of: travel party, region, trip
type, possibility of coming back and times have been to Huangshan, Xidi and
Hongcun. Visitors traveling alone tended to be more aware of the World
Heritage status of the destinations ( p 5 0.021). this result was consistent with
the findings for ‘trip type’ in that independent tourists were generally more
aware of the World Heritage status of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun than
package tourists. the results showed that 44.7% of independent travellers were
in the WHL aware group versus 37.0% of package trip members.
   the visitors from south Korea and Japan had much higher awareness of the
destinations’ World Heritage status than visitors from other parts of the world.
to substantiate the hypothesis that Korean and Japanese visitors were also
more likely to be influenced by the World Heritage listings, an analysis was
done on the relationship between the degree of influence degree and visitors’
origins. the four regions (North America; south Korea and Japan; europe;
other) differed significantly on influence patterns, with p-value equal to 0.000
some 85.3% of the Korean and Japanese visitors were influenced by the infor-
mation on the destinations’ World Heritage status.
   some 71.1% of the WHs aware visitors expressed the intention to revisit
Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun. only 57.5% of the WHs unaware visitors
gave that answer. this contrast showed that the World Heritage listing was an
important reason for tourists to intend to revisit. so, in spite of the WHs aware
group’s lower satisfaction evaluations of tourism activities, they still displayed
stronger revisit intentions than the WHs unaware group. one might wonder if
visitors’ satisfaction levels could be raised higher, the incentives for a repeat
visit would grow as well. Besides, repeat visitors had considerably higher
awareness levels of the destinations’ World Heritage status. some 80% of them
were WHL aware, only 40.2% of first-time visitors knew about the World
Heritage List status of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun (table 3).
Journal of Heritage Tourism

Table 3 Comparisons of socio-demographic characteristics of visitors

    Socio-demographics                 Aware          Not aware        p-Value

    travel party     travel alone      53.1%             46.9%          0.021

                     travel with       39.5%             60.5%
                     other

    region           North             28.6%             71.4%          0.000
                     America

                     south Korea       51.1%             48.9%
                      Japan

                     europe            42.5%             57.5%

                     others            43.2%             56.8%

    trip type        independent       44.7%             55.3%          0.025

                     Package           37.0%             63.0%

    Possibility of   Very likely       55.3%             44.7%          0.000
    coming back
                     Likely            41.7%             58.3%

                     Not sure          32.2%             67.8%

                     unlikely          34.0%             66.0%

    times have       None              40.2%             59.8%          0.000
    been here
                     one time and      80.0%             20.0%
                     above



Conclusions
   World Heritage is ‘of outstanding universal value from the point of view of
history, art or science’ (uNesCo, 1972). this study examined the influence of         Q3
World Heritage inscription on international visitors using Huangshan, Xidi and
Hongcun of southern Anhui, China as a case study.
   this study developed a simple linear regression model to describe the
relationship between visitors’ awareness of the destinations’ World Heritage
status and influence on visit decisions. the results showed that awareness did
motivate people to come but it did not appear to be a very strong influence. this
finding corroborated the arguments of Hall and Piggin (2001) that the link
between World Heritage listings and increased visitation was in fact not as
strong as the stakeholders and tourism business owners expected. the intrinsic
cultural assets, the foremost natural wonders and the unique experiences the
WHs provide, are the real incentives to attract international visitors. this impli-
cation holds particular concern for Chinese stakeholders. China has 31 World
Heritage sites located all over the country. However, there is a common
misconception among site managers and tourism business owners that once a
tourism attraction is ‘glazed’ with the glory of a World Heritage listing, the
Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings                        

visitors, especially international visitors, will flow in automatically. As a result,
not enough attention has been paid to emphasise the true inherent content and
quality of these sites. this case study of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun revealed
that there is still much work that has to be done to engrave the real images of
WHs into international visitors’ minds.
   the awareness of World Heritage status was found to be related to tourists’
visit purposes. People who were not aware of the World Heritage listing were
more inclined to climb Mount Huangshan, while knowledgeable visitors were
more interested in Huizhou cultural and heritage activities. the reason for this
phenomenon could be traced back to the special cultural and natural attributes
of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun. WHs have been categorised by uNesCo
into three types based on their distinctive assets: natural, cultural and mixed.
Huangshan was considered to belong to the ‘mixed’ type of site, which meant
that both the natural and cultural aspects of Huangshan were perceived to be
possessing outstanding and long-lasting values. However, it should be noted
that ‘its natural values then are predominant over the cultural’ (iuCN, 1990).
For the most part, the high esteem of the culture of Huangshan is credited to
history, Chinese poems and paintings. Huangshan has been deemed as a typical
image in Chinese traditional landscape paintings (eigner, 1939; Hers, 1935).
therefore, the cultural aspects of Huangshan are to a large extent very intangible.
For people who do not have sufficient knowledge to understand ancient Chinese
poems and the aesthetic values of traditional Chinese paintings, the culture
underlying Huangshan is obscure and hard to master. unfortunately, this
seems to be true for most international visitors except for some of the Japanese
and Koreans tourists whose culture to some extent shares some similarities. For
these reasons, Huangshan has been typified as an image of ‘a Chinese mountain
with great scenery’ on a global scale. the cultural aspects of Huangshan appear
to pale in comparison to its natural features for most visitors. this might help
explain why those unaware of the World Heritage status of Huangshan did not
show a strong interest in participating in culture and heritage activities because
in their minds, Huangshan was a predominantly natural and scenic attraction,
where climbing to the top was the main priority.
   Another contributing reason is that the lack of sufficient efforts to market
Xidi and Hongcun by the stakeholders and tourism business owners. the two
sites have been positioned by the local government mainly as ancillary attrac-
tions to Huangshan for people visiting the whole region long before the two
were placed on the World Heritage List. Compared to Huangshan, the culture
of Xidi and Hongcun are more tangible such as the unique styles of architecture
and artifacts. However, the parts of culture related to Chinese history such as
‘the ancestral system of the region’ still demands a good understanding of
Chinese society and history. this type of culture, together with many other
types of traditional Chinese cultures that were largely and deeply influenced by
Confucianism, is a conservative and introverted one. For people who were not
raised within Chinese society, it is difficult to understand even superficially.
Nevertheless, the external aesthetic beauty of the two ancient towns, the delicate
man-made artifacts and the well-preserved folklore traditions still present
appealing attractions for people who are both culturally distant and culturally
similar to these places. After 2000 when uNesCo inscribed them on the World
0                                                      Journal of Heritage Tourism

Heritage List for their outstanding cultural values, the local stakeholders and
tourism business owners did not react in the most appropriate way. the two
villages were not separated from the packaged ‘Huangshan-Xidi and Hongcun’
tour. Huangshan was still treated as the dominant tourism attraction in the
region and Xidi and Hongcun are still on a secondary level. Nearly all of the
tourism activities offered by Xidi and Hongcun are related to culture and herit-
age such as ‘visiting ancient historical buildings’ and ‘participating in local folk-
lore cultural activities’. However, the people unaware of the World Heritage
status of Xidi and Hongcun also did not know about the culture and heritage
tourism activities there. As such, they were very unlikely to consider culture
and heritage activities as a primary purpose of visiting.
   the special intrinsic attributes of Huizhou culture could also explain why the
WHs aware group generally had a higher participation ratio in several specific
culture and heritage activities but lower satisfaction levels. Because of the
prestige that the World Heritage List holds, visitors who were aware of the
destinations’ WHs status might presumably have higher expectations. However,
the obscurity of Huizhou culture may have made their experiences not as satis-
factory and exciting as they expected. Although the two groups of visitors might
have had similar tourism experiences in Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun, the
WHs aware group was not equally satisfied. this problem calls for local stake-
holders and tourism business owners’ to give more, better and specific interpre-
tations of the content of Huizhou culture and heritage. if this culture and
heritage could be made more accessible and understandable for foreign visi-
tors, the international image of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun would be greatly
enhanced. Moreover, failures to meet customers’ expectations will eventually
deter international visitors from coming. Moscardo et al. (2001) pointed out that
interpretation combines elements of communication, education and entertain-
ment together and it has the aim of assisting visitors to appreciate the place they
are visiting. so the solution to the problem appears to be two-fold. First, there is
a need to market the three destinations more effectively using the World
Heritage status as the core attraction. second, visitors must gain more under-
standing and appreciation of the contents of culture and heritage of the destina-
tions through more effective interpretation.
   there are several marketing implications resulting from the socio-demographic
characteristics of the WHs aware group of visitors. the Korean and Japanese visi-
tors had much higher awareness of the World Heritage status of the destinations
and were more likely to be positively influenced by these designations. it is
suggested the marketers should put greater emphasis on advertising the WHs
status of the destinations to these two markets. in addition, there existed a strong
positive relationship between visitors’ awareness levels of the WHs status and
intentions for revisiting. Prompt action is required to raise the international
awareness levels of the World Heritage List inscriptions of Huangshan, Xidi and
Hongcun, especially since 80% of repeat visitors were aware recognition of the
WHs status of the destinations. independent travellers also tended to be more
knowledgeable of the WHs status, perhaps having made more prior effort to
become familiar with the destinations. Local stakeholders and tourism busi-
ness owners should give greater attention to these independent travellers. in
contrast, tour operators and travel agencies organising group tours are short
Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings                            

of information of the destinations’ World Heritage listing, or lack interest in
promoting it heavily. this issue also requires immediate thought and attention.
   in summary, the World Heritage status appears to be a significant asset to
support destination marketing. However, sites cannot completely depend on
their listing to attract visitors. Moreover, site managers and marketers must
provide more thorough and professional interpretation of the underlying
culture to help visitors better comprehend what they are experiencing. in fact,
it is the intrinsic content and quality of the sites that really matters rather than
the listing itself. the findings of this study provide important insights for mar-
keting and managing other WHs such as Macao. Further research is needed on
different types of WHs in other countries to more fully explore the impact of
World Heritage status on visitor motivations and satisfaction.

Acknowledgements
  the authors would like to express sincere gratitude to the Department of
tourism Management of Anhui university (China) for helping to collect the data
and providing a part of the funds. the authors especially would like to thank
Professor shangzheng Zhang of the Department of tourism Management at
Anhui university for his great contribution to the completion of the on-site sur-
veys in Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun. the authors also thank the Anhui tourism
Administration and Huangshan international Airport for their assistance.

Correspondence
  Any correspondence should be directed to Cheng Yan Department of                            Q5
recreation, sports and tourism, university of illinois at urbana-Champaign,
Champaign, iL, usA (yanc@purdue.edu).

References
Bandarine, F. (2002) Foreword. World Heritage Manuals 1, 4.
eigner, J. (1939) the enchanting beauty of Huang shan. The  China  Journal 31,
   134–142.
Hall, C.M. and Piggin, r. (2001) tourism and World Heritage in oeCD countries. Tourism 
   Recreation Research 26 (1), 103–105.
Hall, C.M. and Piggin, r. (2002) tourism business knowledge of world heritage sites.
   International Journal of Tourism Research 4 (5), 401–411.
Hers, J. (1935) the sacred mountains of China. Huang shan and how to get there. The 
   China Journal 22, 311–316.
iuCN. (1990) Mount Huangshan and historic sites (China). World Heritage Nomination 
   Report. on WWW at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/547. Accessed 20.9.05.
Kerstetter, D.L., Confer, J.J. and Graefe, A.r. (2001) An exploration of the specialization
   concept within the context of heritage tourism. Journal  of  Travel  Research 39 (3),
   267–274.
Kotler, P., Bowen, J.t. and Makens, J.C. (2005) Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism. New
   Jersey: Pearson education.
Light, D., Prentice, C., Ashworth, G.J. and Larkham, J. (1994) Who Consumes the Heritage 
   Product? Implications for European Tourism. London: routledge.
Moscardo, G., Green, D. and Greenwood, t. (2001) How great is the Great Barrier reef!
   tourists’ knowledge and understanding of the World Heritage status of the Great
   Barrier reef. Tourism Recreation Research 26 (1), 19–25.
Nicholls, s. and Vogt, C. (2004) Heeding the call for heritage tourism. Parks  Recreations
   39 (9), 38–49.
Pedersen, A. (2002) tourism impacts and problems. World Heritage Manuals, 1, 29–31.           Q4
Journal of Heritage Tourism

Peleggi, M. (1996) National heritage and global tourism in thailand. Annals of Tourism 
   Research 23 (2), 432–448.                                                                  Q4
shackley, M. (1998) Visitor Management: Case Studies from World Heritage Sites. Butterworth
   Heinemann: oxford.
silberberg, t. (1995) Cultural tourism and business opportunity for museums and herit-
   age sites. Tourism Management 16 (5), 361–365.                                             Q4
uNesCo (1976) the effects of tourism on socio-cultural values. Annals  of  Tourism 
   Research 4, 74–105.                                                                        Q4
uNesCo (1990) Mount  Huangshan. on WWW at http:/           /whc.unesco.org/en/list/547.
   Accessed 28.8.05.
uNesCo. (2000) Xidi and Hongcun. on WWW at http:/         /whc.unesco.org/en/list/1002.
   Accessed 28.8.05.
uNesCo. (2005) Mostar, Macao and Biblical vestiges in israel are among the 17 cultural
   sites inscribed on uNesCo’s World Heritage List. on WWW at http:/         /whc.unesco.
   org/en/news/135. Accessed 30.8.05.                                                         Q4

Contenu connexe

Tendances

The tourism industry chapter 1
The tourism industry chapter 1The tourism industry chapter 1
The tourism industry chapter 1Ea Fatihah
 
S2 GE Notes - Tourism
S2 GE Notes - TourismS2 GE Notes - Tourism
S2 GE Notes - TourismLEEENNA
 
Culture & Tourism - Dr Ebru GUNLU- Dr Gurhan AKTAS
Culture & Tourism - Dr Ebru GUNLU- Dr Gurhan AKTASCulture & Tourism - Dr Ebru GUNLU- Dr Gurhan AKTAS
Culture & Tourism - Dr Ebru GUNLU- Dr Gurhan AKTASThemistocles Papadimopoulos
 
Heritage Tourism Management
Heritage Tourism ManagementHeritage Tourism Management
Heritage Tourism Managementiainwheeldon
 
CULTURE AND HERITAGE TOURISM
CULTURE AND HERITAGE TOURISMCULTURE AND HERITAGE TOURISM
CULTURE AND HERITAGE TOURISMERICK MAINA
 
Heritage tourism in India
Heritage tourism in IndiaHeritage tourism in India
Heritage tourism in IndiaIndia Curated
 
Tourism ( Importance of Tourism )
Tourism ( Importance of Tourism )Tourism ( Importance of Tourism )
Tourism ( Importance of Tourism )Mike Joseph
 
Socio cultural impact of tourism
Socio cultural impact of tourismSocio cultural impact of tourism
Socio cultural impact of tourismAldith Smith
 
Cultural heritage tourism
Cultural heritage tourismCultural heritage tourism
Cultural heritage tourismTaha Malampatti
 
S2 GE Handout - Tourism (Teacher)
S2 GE Handout - Tourism (Teacher)S2 GE Handout - Tourism (Teacher)
S2 GE Handout - Tourism (Teacher)LEEENNA
 
Destination development policies for alternative tourism
Destination development policies for alternative tourismDestination development policies for alternative tourism
Destination development policies for alternative tourismSarabindhGManoj
 

Tendances (20)

The tourism industry chapter 1
The tourism industry chapter 1The tourism industry chapter 1
The tourism industry chapter 1
 
S2 GE Notes - Tourism
S2 GE Notes - TourismS2 GE Notes - Tourism
S2 GE Notes - Tourism
 
Culture & Tourism - Dr Ebru GUNLU- Dr Gurhan AKTAS
Culture & Tourism - Dr Ebru GUNLU- Dr Gurhan AKTASCulture & Tourism - Dr Ebru GUNLU- Dr Gurhan AKTAS
Culture & Tourism - Dr Ebru GUNLU- Dr Gurhan AKTAS
 
Heritage Tourism Management
Heritage Tourism ManagementHeritage Tourism Management
Heritage Tourism Management
 
CULTURE AND HERITAGE TOURISM
CULTURE AND HERITAGE TOURISMCULTURE AND HERITAGE TOURISM
CULTURE AND HERITAGE TOURISM
 
DISKUSI PENGEMBANGAN PAKET WISATA CULTURAL AND HERITAGE TOURISM HENKY HERMANT...
DISKUSI PENGEMBANGAN PAKET WISATA CULTURAL AND HERITAGE TOURISM HENKY HERMANT...DISKUSI PENGEMBANGAN PAKET WISATA CULTURAL AND HERITAGE TOURISM HENKY HERMANT...
DISKUSI PENGEMBANGAN PAKET WISATA CULTURAL AND HERITAGE TOURISM HENKY HERMANT...
 
Strategic management of rural tourism development
Strategic management of rural tourism developmentStrategic management of rural tourism development
Strategic management of rural tourism development
 
Heritage tourism in India
Heritage tourism in IndiaHeritage tourism in India
Heritage tourism in India
 
ITFT-Tourism geography
ITFT-Tourism geographyITFT-Tourism geography
ITFT-Tourism geography
 
Education in function of Serbia cultural tourism development
Education in function of Serbia cultural tourism developmentEducation in function of Serbia cultural tourism development
Education in function of Serbia cultural tourism development
 
Heritage Tourism
Heritage TourismHeritage Tourism
Heritage Tourism
 
Tourism ( Importance of Tourism )
Tourism ( Importance of Tourism )Tourism ( Importance of Tourism )
Tourism ( Importance of Tourism )
 
Socio cultural impact of tourism
Socio cultural impact of tourismSocio cultural impact of tourism
Socio cultural impact of tourism
 
Cultural heritage tourism
Cultural heritage tourismCultural heritage tourism
Cultural heritage tourism
 
Types of Tourism
Types of TourismTypes of Tourism
Types of Tourism
 
S2 GE Handout - Tourism (Teacher)
S2 GE Handout - Tourism (Teacher)S2 GE Handout - Tourism (Teacher)
S2 GE Handout - Tourism (Teacher)
 
Religious tourism
Religious tourismReligious tourism
Religious tourism
 
YAC Course - Anthropology tourism
YAC Course - Anthropology tourismYAC Course - Anthropology tourism
YAC Course - Anthropology tourism
 
Destination development policies for alternative tourism
Destination development policies for alternative tourismDestination development policies for alternative tourism
Destination development policies for alternative tourism
 
Anthropology of Tourism
Anthropology of TourismAnthropology of Tourism
Anthropology of Tourism
 

En vedette

Choi lehtomorrisontm2007destinationimageonthewebmacau
Choi lehtomorrisontm2007destinationimageonthewebmacauChoi lehtomorrisontm2007destinationimageonthewebmacau
Choi lehtomorrisontm2007destinationimageonthewebmacauA Morrison
 
Stepchenkova morrisontm revisitingechtner
Stepchenkova morrisontm revisitingechtnerStepchenkova morrisontm revisitingechtner
Stepchenkova morrisontm revisitingechtnerA Morrison
 
Tripography humorrisonjvm2002
Tripography humorrisonjvm2002Tripography humorrisonjvm2002
Tripography humorrisonjvm2002A Morrison
 
Al azri morrison 2006
Al azri morrison 2006Al azri morrison 2006
Al azri morrison 2006A Morrison
 
So morrisonjhlm2004
So morrisonjhlm2004So morrisonjhlm2004
So morrisonjhlm2004A Morrison
 
Lee morrisono learytm2006economicvalueportfoliomatrix
Lee morrisono learytm2006economicvalueportfoliomatrixLee morrisono learytm2006economicvalueportfoliomatrix
Lee morrisono learytm2006economicvalueportfoliomatrixA Morrison
 
Lehto brownchenmorrison2006trr
Lehto brownchenmorrison2006trrLehto brownchenmorrison2006trr
Lehto brownchenmorrison2006trrA Morrison
 

En vedette (7)

Choi lehtomorrisontm2007destinationimageonthewebmacau
Choi lehtomorrisontm2007destinationimageonthewebmacauChoi lehtomorrisontm2007destinationimageonthewebmacau
Choi lehtomorrisontm2007destinationimageonthewebmacau
 
Stepchenkova morrisontm revisitingechtner
Stepchenkova morrisontm revisitingechtnerStepchenkova morrisontm revisitingechtner
Stepchenkova morrisontm revisitingechtner
 
Tripography humorrisonjvm2002
Tripography humorrisonjvm2002Tripography humorrisonjvm2002
Tripography humorrisonjvm2002
 
Al azri morrison 2006
Al azri morrison 2006Al azri morrison 2006
Al azri morrison 2006
 
So morrisonjhlm2004
So morrisonjhlm2004So morrisonjhlm2004
So morrisonjhlm2004
 
Lee morrisono learytm2006economicvalueportfoliomatrix
Lee morrisono learytm2006economicvalueportfoliomatrixLee morrisono learytm2006economicvalueportfoliomatrix
Lee morrisono learytm2006economicvalueportfoliomatrix
 
Lehto brownchenmorrison2006trr
Lehto brownchenmorrison2006trrLehto brownchenmorrison2006trr
Lehto brownchenmorrison2006trr
 

Similaire à Yan morrison2007jht

Sustainable Tourism and Culture: A Symbiotic Relationship
Sustainable Tourism and Culture: A Symbiotic RelationshipSustainable Tourism and Culture: A Symbiotic Relationship
Sustainable Tourism and Culture: A Symbiotic RelationshipIEREK Press
 
Cerchiaro&houtman2021 il giro del mondo - atr
Cerchiaro&houtman2021   il giro del mondo - atrCerchiaro&houtman2021   il giro del mondo - atr
Cerchiaro&houtman2021 il giro del mondo - atrRobertoCostaEbech
 
The impact of heritage attributes on the satisfaction of tourism in sri lanka
The impact of heritage attributes on the satisfaction of tourism in sri lankaThe impact of heritage attributes on the satisfaction of tourism in sri lanka
The impact of heritage attributes on the satisfaction of tourism in sri lankaAlexander Decker
 
M Ivanovic Urban Forum 25(2014) 501-515 The Perceived Authenticity of Iconic ...
M Ivanovic Urban Forum 25(2014) 501-515 The Perceived Authenticity of Iconic ...M Ivanovic Urban Forum 25(2014) 501-515 The Perceived Authenticity of Iconic ...
M Ivanovic Urban Forum 25(2014) 501-515 The Perceived Authenticity of Iconic ...Milena Ivanovic, PhD
 
The Problematic Nature Of Cultural Tourism
The Problematic Nature Of Cultural TourismThe Problematic Nature Of Cultural Tourism
The Problematic Nature Of Cultural TourismAurora Tucker
 
The Implementation Gap Between Theory And Practice Of...
The Implementation Gap Between Theory And Practice Of...The Implementation Gap Between Theory And Practice Of...
The Implementation Gap Between Theory And Practice Of...Andrea Jimenez
 
ATLAS CULTURAL TOURISM BIBLIOGRAPHY
ATLAS CULTURAL TOURISM BIBLIOGRAPHYATLAS CULTURAL TOURISM BIBLIOGRAPHY
ATLAS CULTURAL TOURISM BIBLIOGRAPHYAmy Cernava
 
Project TOURISM.pptx
Project TOURISM.pptxProject TOURISM.pptx
Project TOURISM.pptxolta10
 
Slide Deck - Tourism Lecture 2 - Dr Wes Kinghorn (7).pptx
Slide Deck - Tourism Lecture 2 - Dr Wes Kinghorn (7).pptxSlide Deck - Tourism Lecture 2 - Dr Wes Kinghorn (7).pptx
Slide Deck - Tourism Lecture 2 - Dr Wes Kinghorn (7).pptxakorne3
 
Chinese tourists in Tuscany: redefining the relationship between heritage and...
Chinese tourists in Tuscany: redefining the relationship between heritage and...Chinese tourists in Tuscany: redefining the relationship between heritage and...
Chinese tourists in Tuscany: redefining the relationship between heritage and...Nicola Bellini
 
Cultural heritage & its importance
Cultural heritage & its importanceCultural heritage & its importance
Cultural heritage & its importanceTousif Raja
 
Explanation of Tourist Attraction and Their Importance Around the World by Al...
Explanation of Tourist Attraction and Their Importance Around the World by Al...Explanation of Tourist Attraction and Their Importance Around the World by Al...
Explanation of Tourist Attraction and Their Importance Around the World by Al...korayozguclu
 

Similaire à Yan morrison2007jht (20)

Sustainable Tourism and Culture: A Symbiotic Relationship
Sustainable Tourism and Culture: A Symbiotic RelationshipSustainable Tourism and Culture: A Symbiotic Relationship
Sustainable Tourism and Culture: A Symbiotic Relationship
 
Cerchiaro&houtman2021 il giro del mondo - atr
Cerchiaro&houtman2021   il giro del mondo - atrCerchiaro&houtman2021   il giro del mondo - atr
Cerchiaro&houtman2021 il giro del mondo - atr
 
A. Levesque - Museums
A. Levesque - MuseumsA. Levesque - Museums
A. Levesque - Museums
 
The impact of heritage attributes on the satisfaction of tourism in sri lanka
The impact of heritage attributes on the satisfaction of tourism in sri lankaThe impact of heritage attributes on the satisfaction of tourism in sri lanka
The impact of heritage attributes on the satisfaction of tourism in sri lanka
 
M Ivanovic Urban Forum 25(2014) 501-515 The Perceived Authenticity of Iconic ...
M Ivanovic Urban Forum 25(2014) 501-515 The Perceived Authenticity of Iconic ...M Ivanovic Urban Forum 25(2014) 501-515 The Perceived Authenticity of Iconic ...
M Ivanovic Urban Forum 25(2014) 501-515 The Perceived Authenticity of Iconic ...
 
The Problematic Nature Of Cultural Tourism
The Problematic Nature Of Cultural TourismThe Problematic Nature Of Cultural Tourism
The Problematic Nature Of Cultural Tourism
 
The Sociology Of Tourism
The Sociology Of TourismThe Sociology Of Tourism
The Sociology Of Tourism
 
Persuasive Essay About Tourism
Persuasive Essay About TourismPersuasive Essay About Tourism
Persuasive Essay About Tourism
 
dissertation
dissertationdissertation
dissertation
 
The Implementation Gap Between Theory And Practice Of...
The Implementation Gap Between Theory And Practice Of...The Implementation Gap Between Theory And Practice Of...
The Implementation Gap Between Theory And Practice Of...
 
ATLAS CULTURAL TOURISM BIBLIOGRAPHY
ATLAS CULTURAL TOURISM BIBLIOGRAPHYATLAS CULTURAL TOURISM BIBLIOGRAPHY
ATLAS CULTURAL TOURISM BIBLIOGRAPHY
 
Travel And Tourism Essay
Travel And Tourism EssayTravel And Tourism Essay
Travel And Tourism Essay
 
Project TOURISM.pptx
Project TOURISM.pptxProject TOURISM.pptx
Project TOURISM.pptx
 
Slide Deck - Tourism Lecture 2 - Dr Wes Kinghorn (7).pptx
Slide Deck - Tourism Lecture 2 - Dr Wes Kinghorn (7).pptxSlide Deck - Tourism Lecture 2 - Dr Wes Kinghorn (7).pptx
Slide Deck - Tourism Lecture 2 - Dr Wes Kinghorn (7).pptx
 
LowerEastSide
LowerEastSideLowerEastSide
LowerEastSide
 
Seminararbeit_Bachlor
Seminararbeit_BachlorSeminararbeit_Bachlor
Seminararbeit_Bachlor
 
Chinese tourists in Tuscany: redefining the relationship between heritage and...
Chinese tourists in Tuscany: redefining the relationship between heritage and...Chinese tourists in Tuscany: redefining the relationship between heritage and...
Chinese tourists in Tuscany: redefining the relationship between heritage and...
 
Cultural heritage & its importance
Cultural heritage & its importanceCultural heritage & its importance
Cultural heritage & its importance
 
IJRTI.pdf
IJRTI.pdfIJRTI.pdf
IJRTI.pdf
 
Explanation of Tourist Attraction and Their Importance Around the World by Al...
Explanation of Tourist Attraction and Their Importance Around the World by Al...Explanation of Tourist Attraction and Their Importance Around the World by Al...
Explanation of Tourist Attraction and Their Importance Around the World by Al...
 

Plus de A Morrison

Market research and segmentation plan
Market research and segmentation planMarket research and segmentation plan
Market research and segmentation planA Morrison
 
Yuan morrisonlintonfengjeontrr2004
Yuan morrisonlintonfengjeontrr2004Yuan morrisonlintonfengjeontrr2004
Yuan morrisonlintonfengjeontrr2004A Morrison
 
Tri yuan,cai, morrison & linton new
Tri yuan,cai, morrison & linton newTri yuan,cai, morrison & linton new
Tri yuan,cai, morrison & linton newA Morrison
 
Tm kim lehtomorrison2006
Tm kim lehtomorrison2006Tm kim lehtomorrison2006
Tm kim lehtomorrison2006A Morrison
 
Sung morrisono learyaventuretravel
Sung morrisono learyaventuretravelSung morrisono learyaventuretravel
Sung morrisono learyaventuretravelA Morrison
 
Stepchenkova morrisontm russiadestinationimage2006
Stepchenkova morrisontm russiadestinationimage2006Stepchenkova morrisontm russiadestinationimage2006
Stepchenkova morrisontm russiadestinationimage2006A Morrison
 
Stepchenkova chenmorrisonctr
Stepchenkova chenmorrisonctrStepchenkova chenmorrisonctr
Stepchenkova chenmorrisonctrA Morrison
 
So morrisonitt2003
So morrisonitt2003So morrisonitt2003
So morrisonitt2003A Morrison
 
Rezende morrisonismailjvm brazil
Rezende morrisonismailjvm brazilRezende morrisonismailjvm brazil
Rezende morrisonismailjvm brazilA Morrison
 
Myung morrisontaylor2005trr
Myung morrisontaylor2005trrMyung morrisontaylor2005trr
Myung morrisontaylor2005trrA Morrison
 
Moscardo morrisonetaljvm1996 vol2no2
Moscardo morrisonetaljvm1996 vol2no2Moscardo morrisonetaljvm1996 vol2no2
Moscardo morrisonetaljvm1996 vol2no2A Morrison
 
Moscardoetal jtr2000
Moscardoetal jtr2000Moscardoetal jtr2000
Moscardoetal jtr2000A Morrison
 
Morrison taylordouglasjttm2004
Morrison taylordouglasjttm2004Morrison taylordouglasjttm2004
Morrison taylordouglasjttm2004A Morrison
 
Morrison o learyjts1995
Morrison o learyjts1995Morrison o learyjts1995
Morrison o learyjts1995A Morrison
 
Morrison hsieho learyjts1995
Morrison hsieho learyjts1995Morrison hsieho learyjts1995
Morrison hsieho learyjts1995A Morrison
 
Morrison hsieho learyjts1994
Morrison hsieho learyjts1994Morrison hsieho learyjts1994
Morrison hsieho learyjts1994A Morrison
 
Marketing smallhotelsonwww
Marketing smallhotelsonwwwMarketing smallhotelsonwww
Marketing smallhotelsonwwwA Morrison
 
Kline morrisonstjohnjttm2004
Kline morrisonstjohnjttm2004Kline morrisonstjohnjttm2004
Kline morrisonstjohnjttm2004A Morrison
 
Kim morrisonmillstiersortearsljcem2003
Kim morrisonmillstiersortearsljcem2003Kim morrisonmillstiersortearsljcem2003
Kim morrisonmillstiersortearsljcem2003A Morrison
 
Jang morrisono learyjttm2004
Jang morrisono learyjttm2004Jang morrisono learyjttm2004
Jang morrisono learyjttm2004A Morrison
 

Plus de A Morrison (20)

Market research and segmentation plan
Market research and segmentation planMarket research and segmentation plan
Market research and segmentation plan
 
Yuan morrisonlintonfengjeontrr2004
Yuan morrisonlintonfengjeontrr2004Yuan morrisonlintonfengjeontrr2004
Yuan morrisonlintonfengjeontrr2004
 
Tri yuan,cai, morrison & linton new
Tri yuan,cai, morrison & linton newTri yuan,cai, morrison & linton new
Tri yuan,cai, morrison & linton new
 
Tm kim lehtomorrison2006
Tm kim lehtomorrison2006Tm kim lehtomorrison2006
Tm kim lehtomorrison2006
 
Sung morrisono learyaventuretravel
Sung morrisono learyaventuretravelSung morrisono learyaventuretravel
Sung morrisono learyaventuretravel
 
Stepchenkova morrisontm russiadestinationimage2006
Stepchenkova morrisontm russiadestinationimage2006Stepchenkova morrisontm russiadestinationimage2006
Stepchenkova morrisontm russiadestinationimage2006
 
Stepchenkova chenmorrisonctr
Stepchenkova chenmorrisonctrStepchenkova chenmorrisonctr
Stepchenkova chenmorrisonctr
 
So morrisonitt2003
So morrisonitt2003So morrisonitt2003
So morrisonitt2003
 
Rezende morrisonismailjvm brazil
Rezende morrisonismailjvm brazilRezende morrisonismailjvm brazil
Rezende morrisonismailjvm brazil
 
Myung morrisontaylor2005trr
Myung morrisontaylor2005trrMyung morrisontaylor2005trr
Myung morrisontaylor2005trr
 
Moscardo morrisonetaljvm1996 vol2no2
Moscardo morrisonetaljvm1996 vol2no2Moscardo morrisonetaljvm1996 vol2no2
Moscardo morrisonetaljvm1996 vol2no2
 
Moscardoetal jtr2000
Moscardoetal jtr2000Moscardoetal jtr2000
Moscardoetal jtr2000
 
Morrison taylordouglasjttm2004
Morrison taylordouglasjttm2004Morrison taylordouglasjttm2004
Morrison taylordouglasjttm2004
 
Morrison o learyjts1995
Morrison o learyjts1995Morrison o learyjts1995
Morrison o learyjts1995
 
Morrison hsieho learyjts1995
Morrison hsieho learyjts1995Morrison hsieho learyjts1995
Morrison hsieho learyjts1995
 
Morrison hsieho learyjts1994
Morrison hsieho learyjts1994Morrison hsieho learyjts1994
Morrison hsieho learyjts1994
 
Marketing smallhotelsonwww
Marketing smallhotelsonwwwMarketing smallhotelsonwww
Marketing smallhotelsonwww
 
Kline morrisonstjohnjttm2004
Kline morrisonstjohnjttm2004Kline morrisonstjohnjttm2004
Kline morrisonstjohnjttm2004
 
Kim morrisonmillstiersortearsljcem2003
Kim morrisonmillstiersortearsljcem2003Kim morrisonmillstiersortearsljcem2003
Kim morrisonmillstiersortearsljcem2003
 
Jang morrisono learyjttm2004
Jang morrisono learyjttm2004Jang morrisono learyjttm2004
Jang morrisono learyjttm2004
 

Dernier

Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxraviapr7
 
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.raviapr7
 
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxIn - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxAditiChauhan701637
 
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdfDepartment of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdfMohonDas
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting BlEBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting BlDr. Bruce A. Johnson
 
How to Send Emails From Odoo 17 Using Code
How to Send Emails From Odoo 17 Using CodeHow to Send Emails From Odoo 17 Using Code
How to Send Emails From Odoo 17 Using CodeCeline George
 
3.26.24 Race, the Draft, and the Vietnam War.pptx
3.26.24 Race, the Draft, and the Vietnam War.pptx3.26.24 Race, the Draft, and the Vietnam War.pptx
3.26.24 Race, the Draft, and the Vietnam War.pptxmary850239
 
Unveiling the Intricacies of Leishmania donovani: Structure, Life Cycle, Path...
Unveiling the Intricacies of Leishmania donovani: Structure, Life Cycle, Path...Unveiling the Intricacies of Leishmania donovani: Structure, Life Cycle, Path...
Unveiling the Intricacies of Leishmania donovani: Structure, Life Cycle, Path...Dr. Asif Anas
 
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRADUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRATanmoy Mishra
 
Work Experience for psp3 portfolio sasha
Work Experience for psp3 portfolio sashaWork Experience for psp3 portfolio sasha
Work Experience for psp3 portfolio sashasashalaycock03
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxDr. Asif Anas
 
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...CaraSkikne1
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfYu Kanazawa / Osaka University
 
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptxSlides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptxCapitolTechU
 
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...raviapr7
 
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfDiploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfMohonDas
 

Dernier (20)

Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
 
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
 
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxIn - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
 
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdfDepartment of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
 
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting BlEBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
EBUS5423 Data Analytics and Reporting Bl
 
How to Send Emails From Odoo 17 Using Code
How to Send Emails From Odoo 17 Using CodeHow to Send Emails From Odoo 17 Using Code
How to Send Emails From Odoo 17 Using Code
 
Personal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdf
Personal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdfPersonal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdf
Personal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdf
 
3.26.24 Race, the Draft, and the Vietnam War.pptx
3.26.24 Race, the Draft, and the Vietnam War.pptx3.26.24 Race, the Draft, and the Vietnam War.pptx
3.26.24 Race, the Draft, and the Vietnam War.pptx
 
Unveiling the Intricacies of Leishmania donovani: Structure, Life Cycle, Path...
Unveiling the Intricacies of Leishmania donovani: Structure, Life Cycle, Path...Unveiling the Intricacies of Leishmania donovani: Structure, Life Cycle, Path...
Unveiling the Intricacies of Leishmania donovani: Structure, Life Cycle, Path...
 
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRADUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
 
Work Experience for psp3 portfolio sasha
Work Experience for psp3 portfolio sashaWork Experience for psp3 portfolio sasha
Work Experience for psp3 portfolio sasha
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
 
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
 
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptxSlides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
 
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
 
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
 
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfDiploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
 

Yan morrison2007jht

  • 1. JOURNAL OF HERITAGE TOURISM ARTICLE ID: HT 059 TO: CORRESPONDING AUTHOR AUTHOR QUERIES - TO BE ANSWERED BY THE AUTHOR The following queries have arisen during the typesetting of your manuscript. Please answer these queries. Q1 Bandarin, 2001 in text but Bandarine, 2002 in Reference list Q2 Chandler et al. (2002) not in Reference list. Q3 UNESCO (1972) not in Reference list. Q4 Where are these references cited in text? Q5 Please give full postal address (street, zip code) for Correspondence.
  • 2. The Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings: A Case Study of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun in Southern Anhui, China Cheng (Grace) Yan Department of Recreation, Sports and Tourism, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA Alastair M. Morrison Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA This research used Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun in southern Anhui (China) as a case to study the impact of World Heritage List (WHL) status on international visi- tors. The study categorised all the visitors into two types – WHL aware and WHL unaware – based on awareness levels of the World Heritage status of the destina- tion. The two groups were compared in terms of visit purposes, socio-demographics and other characteristics. The results showed that the World Heritage List status did have an impact on travellers’ visit decisions. Additionally, the World Heritage List status proved to be related to tourists’ visit purposes, activity patterns and socio- demographic characteristics. However, the World Heritage List status will be a more influential tool for destinations when marketers place emphasis on the underlying cultural contents of sites and make the cultural elements accessible and interpreta- ble for international visitors. Keywords: China, heritage tourism, Mount Huangshan, World Heritage List status Introduction Mount Huangshan lies in the south of Anhui Province, China. the property extends over a core area of 15,400 hectares. uNesCo inscribed Huangshan on its World Heritage List in 1990. Huangshan occupies a central spot in China’s artistic, cultural and environmental heritage. Huangshan, known as ‘the loveliest mountain of China’ (uNesCo, 1990), has been acclaimed through art and literature during a good part of Chinese history. today, Huangshan holds the same fascination for visitors for its magnificent scenery of granite peaks and rocks emerging out of a sea of clouds. According to uNesCo’s definition, World Heritage sites (WHs) could be basically categorised into three types: natural, cultural and mixed (mixed being cultural and natural heritage). While Mount Huangshan was placed under the category of mixed heritage, uNesCo placed the ancient villages of Xidi and Hongcun under the category of cultural heritage on World Heritage List in 2000. the two villages are located quite close to Mount Huangshan and are graphic illustrations of a type of human settlement created during a feudal 1743-873X/07/03 001-012 $20.00/0 © 2007 C.G. Yan & A.M. Morrison HeritAGe tourisM Vol. 2, No. 3, 2007
  • 3. Journal of Heritage Tourism period and based on a prosperous trading economy – the Huizhou period. the patterns of buildings and streets in these two ancient villages reflect the socio- economic structure of a long-lived and settled period of Chinese history (uNesCo, 2000). Blood ties linked the inhabitants living in the two villages. traditional customs are maintained, and there is a high degree of social stabil- ity. the ancient villages of Anhui are among the most characteristic examples of traditional Chinese villages. they are usually located at the base of a mountain, alongside rivers or lakes; they have regular spatial layouts of quiet, narrow alleys and picturesque gardens at the mouths of rivers. the architecture is simple, yet elegant, with unique forms of gables, delicate carvings and orna- mentation and elegant interior furnishings. the regional culture of southern Anhui is called ‘Huizhou Culture’, an ancient culture dating to around 600 BC. it reached its apogee in the 14th–19th centuries, when Anhui had a dominant influence in various aspects of Chinese culture, such as arts, architecture, culinary arts, music and the influential Cheng Zu (an ancient Chinese emperor) philosophy, which is an interpretation of Confucianism. the ‘Huizhou’ culture has a broad geographic scope including Mount Huangshan and Xidi and Hongcun. the two villages of Xidi and Hongcun particularly retain in material form many elements of this important Chinese culture. However, all historic cultures have been more or less eroded as a result of social development and modernisation. in the mountain areas of southern Anhui, family and blood ties are loosening and the influence of Huizhou culture is gradually diminishing. Xidi and Hongcun are two of the few surviving villages that have not undergone radical changes. the number of international visitors to these sites has been increasing dra- matically, from 2,205,000 in 2000 to 3,256,000 in 2004 (including taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao). Local tourism administrators and tourism enterprises are making great efforts to market cultural heritage tourism products, especially to international visitors. However, there is no available research focusing on the World Heritage status of the three places and the impact of this status on inter- national visitations in Xidi, Hongcun and Huangshan. Literature Review Properties selected for inscription on the World Heritage List are considered the foremost natural and cultural wonders of the world. such is the significance of World Heritage status that WHs have been described as ‘magnets for visitors’ and World Heritage designation ‘virtually a guarantee that visitor numbers will increase’ (shackley, 1998). Bandarin (2001) stated that it is an inevitable destiny Q1 that the very reasons a property is chosen for inscription on the World Heritage List are also the reasons millions of tourists visit these sites. Although it is often suggested that World Heritage status increases the popularity of a location or destination, Hall and Piggin (2001) found that the link between the WHs status and increased visitation above existing tourism trends is somewhat tenuous. they also suggested that the intrinsic qualities of the place itself might be a major factor in tourist visitation to the area, with World Heritage status having only a marginal effect on visitor numbers or relative attractiveness (Hall Piggin, 2002). since the inception of the World Heritage List, there have been considerable discussions about issues such as the conservation of World Heritage sites, the
  • 4. Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings management of the sites and the educational benefits brought by tourism to heritage sites. Although these complexities have invoked discussions in both the academic and popular literature, little empirical analysis has been done on the tourism marketing and promotion of WHs (Hall Piggin, 2002). the under- lying relationship between the World Heritage List and tourism was made explicit by uNesCo itself in 1976, which described tourism as ‘more than an economic phenomenon with social and cultural effects, has become a phenomenon of civilization’ (uNesCo). it was suggested that the profits generated by tourism activities would improve the preservation of such sites, create new jobs, better educate local people and promote greater public aware- ness of the sites’ cultural or natural values, thereby increasing the chances of future preservation (Nicholls Vogt, 2004). At many WHs, developing tourism is the only alternative to overcome current poor economic situations. Despite this, Hall and Piggin (2002) found the majority of affected tourism businesses in New Zealand were not capitalising on their proximity to WHs in their promo- tions. therefore, what roles should World Heritage listings actually play for destinations in attracting visitors? in addition, there also seems to be a substan- tial gap between the knowledge on the interplay of the intrinsic qualities of WHs and the associated values among visitors. What does a World Heritage listing mean to visitors and how important is this as a travel motivation? Many studies have found that heritage tourists tend to have distinctive socio- demographic characteristics compared with other travellers. Light et al. (1994) described heritage tourists as being middle class, well educated, middle aged, with no children, on holiday away from home and having a prior knowledge of history. Previous research has also revealed that heritage tourists tend to stay longer (4.7 vs. 3.3 nights), spend more money per trip ($615 vs. $425) and have higher average annual incomes ($42,133 vs. $41,455) (Kerstetter et al., 2001). Q2 Chandler et al. (2002) showed heritage tourists made more frequent use of travel information sources such as visitor centers, maps, highway signs, brochures and pamphlets. However, there is little available research on the linkage between the appreciation of WHs and visitors’ socio-demographic characteris- tics and activity patterns. For example, are there significant socio-demographic differences between visitors who are fully aware of the importance of World Heritage listing and visitors who have no such knowledge? Moreover, do the visitors with World Heritage awareness tend to participate in more heritage- and cultural-related activities within a destination? Research Objectives the main research objectives of this study were two-fold. the first was to determine the influence of the World Heritage status of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun on international visitors’ travel decisions. the second was to compare the trip characteristics, socio-demographic profiles and activity preferences among international visitors according to awareness levels of these World Heritage listings. Five specific research objectives were identified: (1) to explore the awareness levels of World Heritage listings for Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun among international visitors and then to divide them into two awareness groups – ’aware’ and ‘unaware’.
  • 5. Journal of Heritage Tourism (2) to investigate the relationship between visitors’ awareness of the World Heritage List status and their decisions to come to this part of southern Anhui. (3) to study the relationship between the knowledge of the World Heritage status and tourists’ visit purposes. (4) to profile these two groups of visitors and compare them in terms of socio- demographic and trip characteristics. (5) to analyse the association of awareness levels and activity patterns of the two groups of international visitors. Methods the study used data from the International Visitor Survey for Huangshan, Xidi  and Hongcun in 2005. interviews were conducted in Huangshan international Airport, Huangshan train station and local hotels with departing international visitors from 2 July to 30 July. A total of 879 interviews were completed and the respondents came from 41 different countries. the research utilised sPss to analyse the data. the data were first segregated into travel parties who were aware of the destinations’ World Heritage List status and those unaware by using the survey question, ‘Did you know Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun were placed on uNesCo’s World Heritage List before you came?’ Visitors who gave an affirmative answer were identified as belonging to the first group. then, this group of visitors was also asked to indicate the degree of the influence of the destinations’ World Heritage List status had on their visit decisions from ‘significantly’ to ‘somewhat’ to ‘not at all’. in that way, they were categorised into three groups labelled as ‘significantly influenced’, ‘somewhat influenced’ and ‘not influenced’, respectively. Furthermore, the study combined the ‘significantly influenced’ and ‘somewhat influenced’ into one group ‘influ- enced’ to compare with a ‘not influenced’ group. Later, logistic regression analysis was employed to explore the relationship between the awareness of the prestige of the destination’s World Heritage status and its influence on people’s visit decisions. in the interviews, respondents were asked to identify the tourism activities they participated in during their visits. Chi-square tests were used to compare the activity participation patterns between the different groups. those who participated in culture and heritage related activities were also asked to give their satisfaction evaluations by choosing a number from 1 to 5, where 1 meant poor and 5 was excellent. to investigate satisfaction levels with tourism activi- ties, ANoVA tests compared the mean scores of different groups. Chi-square tests were used to detect significant differences in the socio-demographic and trip characteristics of the groups. Findings The influence of World Heritage status on visitors’ decisions to come to Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun Among respondents who answered the particular question (n 5 685, 77.9%), some 285 (41.6%) visitors were aware of the World Heritage listings, and 400
  • 6. Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings (58.4%) were unaware of them. Within the ‘aware’ group, 200 (67.1%) were influenced by the message that Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun were listed as WHs. these figures indicated that the knowledge of World Heritage listing had a moderate effect, rather than a dramatic one on visitors’ decisions. this was further illustrated in that 45% of the ‘aware’ visitors said that this knowledge ‘somewhat’ influenced their decision in making the trips, while only 22% responded that the knowledge had a significant impact. A simple linear regression formula was developed to measure the influence degree brought by the destinations’ World Heritage List status among interna- tional visitors: Y(influence) = 0.774-1.025*X(awarencess) independent variable ‘X’ had two possible values and they were ‘0’ and ‘1’. the value ‘0’ designated ‘awareness’ and ‘1’ was ‘no awareness’. When X equalled 0, dependent variable Y turned out to be 0.774; when X equalled 1, Y became -0.251 correspondingly. to interpret the two results, it should also be noted that ‘Y 5 1’ means ‘being influenced’ and subsequently, ‘Y 5 0’ is the same with ‘not being influenced’. this regression formula was examined by ANoVA test, and both the intercept ( p 5 0.000) and the slope ( p 5 0.049) proved to be significant. this model had dual meanings. First, tourists’ visit decisions were positively influenced by the knowledge of the destinations’ World Heritage status. that could be explained by the Y value increasing with X went from ‘no awareness’ to ‘awareness’. second, despite the two being positively related, the influence of the knowledge was rather subtle. even for people who recognised the World Heritage status of the destinations, the influence level on their visit decisions was less than ‘1’. the perception of WHs did not have a large impact on visitors’ decision-making processes. World Heritage List status and tourists’ visit purposes in terms of specific visit purposes, respondents were found to be significantly different in ‘Huizhou culture and heritage’ ( p 5 0.000). Although the overall level of visiting for the primary purpose of Huizhou culture and heritage was low, the connection between being aware of the destinations’ World Heritage listing and being interested in participating in local culture and heritage tourism activities was quite salient. the WHs aware visitors were more likely to have the purpose of participating in Huizhou culture and heritage activities than the WHs unaware group (20.1% versus 10.5%) (see table 1). Conversely, the WHs unaware group had stronger motivation to climb Mount Huangshan. the p-value for the difference between the two groups was 0.57, which was close to being a significant value at the level of α 5 0.05 (see table 2). World Heritage List status and tourism activities the visitors with knowledge about the destinations’ World Heritage List status were found to be more likely to participate in local folklore cultural activi- ties ( p 5 0.006). However, the two groups of visitors displayed very similar satisfaction levels with this particular type of tourism activity. the WHs
  • 7. Journal of Heritage Tourism Table 1 Knowledge of World Heritage List status and Huizhou culture and heritage Heritage purpose Knowledge of WHL Not aware Aware No Count 357 226 % Within purpose of heritage 61.2 38.8 % Within knowledge of WHL 89.5 79.9 % of total 52.3 33.1 Yes Count 42 57 % Within purpose of heritage 42.4 57.6 % Within knowledge of WHL 10.5 20.1 % of total 6.2 8.4 total Count 399 283 Table 2 Knowledge of World Heritage List status and climbing Mt Huangshan Climbing Knowledge of WHL Huangshan Not aware Aware No Count 67 64 % Within purpose ofclimbing 51.1 48.9 % Within knowledge of WHL 16.8 22.6 % of total 9.8 9.4 Yes Count 332 219 % Within purpose of climbing 60.3 39.7 % Within knowledge of WHL 83.2 77.4 unaware group even had a slightly higher mean score of 3.28 compared to the WHs aware group’s mean value 3.18. this result showed that there was not a positive relationship between participation in folklore cultural activities and satisfaction levels among the visitors. this leads to some intriguing questions. the knowledge of World Heritage status definitely seemed to attract people to get involved in the local folklore cultural activities that could be considered representative of Huizhou culture and heritage. But did those who were aware of the great reputations of WHs have higher expectations, and the real experi- ences failed to reach their ‘idealised’ standards? in that sense, was the World Heritage status really a helpful tool in facilitating local heritage tourism devel- opment? According to Kotler et al. (2005), ‘customer satisfaction depends on a
  • 8. Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings product’s perceived performance in delivering value relative to a buyer’s expec- tations. if the product’s performance falls short of the customer’s expectations, the buyer is dissatisfied’. if the buyers are not satisfied, they may not make the same purchasing choice again. therefore, the first-time visitors to Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun are less likely to become repeat visitors if their expectations are not met. A similar situation was found for ‘visiting historical ancient buildings’ and ‘appreciating traditional Chinese calligraphies and paintings’. in these two cases, ‘not influenced’ visitors had higher satisfaction scores than ‘influenced’ visitors. the significant level for the two group of visitors for ‘visiting historical ancient buildings’ was 0.005 with the mean score of the ‘influenced’ group being 3.70 and the ‘not influenced’ being 4.12. As for ‘appreciating traditional Chinese calligraphies and paintings’, the p-value was 0.006 and the two means were 3.56 and 4.08, respectively. Again, the results cast doubt on the role that World Heritage listing actually played in heritage tourists’ visits if they could not have satisfactory experiences. Socio-demographic characteristics of visitors Visitors who were knowledgeable of the destination’s World Heritage status were found to be significantly different in terms of: travel party, region, trip type, possibility of coming back and times have been to Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun. Visitors traveling alone tended to be more aware of the World Heritage status of the destinations ( p 5 0.021). this result was consistent with the findings for ‘trip type’ in that independent tourists were generally more aware of the World Heritage status of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun than package tourists. the results showed that 44.7% of independent travellers were in the WHL aware group versus 37.0% of package trip members. the visitors from south Korea and Japan had much higher awareness of the destinations’ World Heritage status than visitors from other parts of the world. to substantiate the hypothesis that Korean and Japanese visitors were also more likely to be influenced by the World Heritage listings, an analysis was done on the relationship between the degree of influence degree and visitors’ origins. the four regions (North America; south Korea and Japan; europe; other) differed significantly on influence patterns, with p-value equal to 0.000 some 85.3% of the Korean and Japanese visitors were influenced by the infor- mation on the destinations’ World Heritage status. some 71.1% of the WHs aware visitors expressed the intention to revisit Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun. only 57.5% of the WHs unaware visitors gave that answer. this contrast showed that the World Heritage listing was an important reason for tourists to intend to revisit. so, in spite of the WHs aware group’s lower satisfaction evaluations of tourism activities, they still displayed stronger revisit intentions than the WHs unaware group. one might wonder if visitors’ satisfaction levels could be raised higher, the incentives for a repeat visit would grow as well. Besides, repeat visitors had considerably higher awareness levels of the destinations’ World Heritage status. some 80% of them were WHL aware, only 40.2% of first-time visitors knew about the World Heritage List status of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun (table 3).
  • 9. Journal of Heritage Tourism Table 3 Comparisons of socio-demographic characteristics of visitors Socio-demographics Aware Not aware p-Value travel party travel alone 53.1% 46.9% 0.021 travel with 39.5% 60.5% other region North 28.6% 71.4% 0.000 America south Korea 51.1% 48.9% Japan europe 42.5% 57.5% others 43.2% 56.8% trip type independent 44.7% 55.3% 0.025 Package 37.0% 63.0% Possibility of Very likely 55.3% 44.7% 0.000 coming back Likely 41.7% 58.3% Not sure 32.2% 67.8% unlikely 34.0% 66.0% times have None 40.2% 59.8% 0.000 been here one time and 80.0% 20.0% above Conclusions World Heritage is ‘of outstanding universal value from the point of view of history, art or science’ (uNesCo, 1972). this study examined the influence of Q3 World Heritage inscription on international visitors using Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun of southern Anhui, China as a case study. this study developed a simple linear regression model to describe the relationship between visitors’ awareness of the destinations’ World Heritage status and influence on visit decisions. the results showed that awareness did motivate people to come but it did not appear to be a very strong influence. this finding corroborated the arguments of Hall and Piggin (2001) that the link between World Heritage listings and increased visitation was in fact not as strong as the stakeholders and tourism business owners expected. the intrinsic cultural assets, the foremost natural wonders and the unique experiences the WHs provide, are the real incentives to attract international visitors. this impli- cation holds particular concern for Chinese stakeholders. China has 31 World Heritage sites located all over the country. However, there is a common misconception among site managers and tourism business owners that once a tourism attraction is ‘glazed’ with the glory of a World Heritage listing, the
  • 10. Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings visitors, especially international visitors, will flow in automatically. As a result, not enough attention has been paid to emphasise the true inherent content and quality of these sites. this case study of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun revealed that there is still much work that has to be done to engrave the real images of WHs into international visitors’ minds. the awareness of World Heritage status was found to be related to tourists’ visit purposes. People who were not aware of the World Heritage listing were more inclined to climb Mount Huangshan, while knowledgeable visitors were more interested in Huizhou cultural and heritage activities. the reason for this phenomenon could be traced back to the special cultural and natural attributes of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun. WHs have been categorised by uNesCo into three types based on their distinctive assets: natural, cultural and mixed. Huangshan was considered to belong to the ‘mixed’ type of site, which meant that both the natural and cultural aspects of Huangshan were perceived to be possessing outstanding and long-lasting values. However, it should be noted that ‘its natural values then are predominant over the cultural’ (iuCN, 1990). For the most part, the high esteem of the culture of Huangshan is credited to history, Chinese poems and paintings. Huangshan has been deemed as a typical image in Chinese traditional landscape paintings (eigner, 1939; Hers, 1935). therefore, the cultural aspects of Huangshan are to a large extent very intangible. For people who do not have sufficient knowledge to understand ancient Chinese poems and the aesthetic values of traditional Chinese paintings, the culture underlying Huangshan is obscure and hard to master. unfortunately, this seems to be true for most international visitors except for some of the Japanese and Koreans tourists whose culture to some extent shares some similarities. For these reasons, Huangshan has been typified as an image of ‘a Chinese mountain with great scenery’ on a global scale. the cultural aspects of Huangshan appear to pale in comparison to its natural features for most visitors. this might help explain why those unaware of the World Heritage status of Huangshan did not show a strong interest in participating in culture and heritage activities because in their minds, Huangshan was a predominantly natural and scenic attraction, where climbing to the top was the main priority. Another contributing reason is that the lack of sufficient efforts to market Xidi and Hongcun by the stakeholders and tourism business owners. the two sites have been positioned by the local government mainly as ancillary attrac- tions to Huangshan for people visiting the whole region long before the two were placed on the World Heritage List. Compared to Huangshan, the culture of Xidi and Hongcun are more tangible such as the unique styles of architecture and artifacts. However, the parts of culture related to Chinese history such as ‘the ancestral system of the region’ still demands a good understanding of Chinese society and history. this type of culture, together with many other types of traditional Chinese cultures that were largely and deeply influenced by Confucianism, is a conservative and introverted one. For people who were not raised within Chinese society, it is difficult to understand even superficially. Nevertheless, the external aesthetic beauty of the two ancient towns, the delicate man-made artifacts and the well-preserved folklore traditions still present appealing attractions for people who are both culturally distant and culturally similar to these places. After 2000 when uNesCo inscribed them on the World
  • 11. 0 Journal of Heritage Tourism Heritage List for their outstanding cultural values, the local stakeholders and tourism business owners did not react in the most appropriate way. the two villages were not separated from the packaged ‘Huangshan-Xidi and Hongcun’ tour. Huangshan was still treated as the dominant tourism attraction in the region and Xidi and Hongcun are still on a secondary level. Nearly all of the tourism activities offered by Xidi and Hongcun are related to culture and herit- age such as ‘visiting ancient historical buildings’ and ‘participating in local folk- lore cultural activities’. However, the people unaware of the World Heritage status of Xidi and Hongcun also did not know about the culture and heritage tourism activities there. As such, they were very unlikely to consider culture and heritage activities as a primary purpose of visiting. the special intrinsic attributes of Huizhou culture could also explain why the WHs aware group generally had a higher participation ratio in several specific culture and heritage activities but lower satisfaction levels. Because of the prestige that the World Heritage List holds, visitors who were aware of the destinations’ WHs status might presumably have higher expectations. However, the obscurity of Huizhou culture may have made their experiences not as satis- factory and exciting as they expected. Although the two groups of visitors might have had similar tourism experiences in Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun, the WHs aware group was not equally satisfied. this problem calls for local stake- holders and tourism business owners’ to give more, better and specific interpre- tations of the content of Huizhou culture and heritage. if this culture and heritage could be made more accessible and understandable for foreign visi- tors, the international image of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun would be greatly enhanced. Moreover, failures to meet customers’ expectations will eventually deter international visitors from coming. Moscardo et al. (2001) pointed out that interpretation combines elements of communication, education and entertain- ment together and it has the aim of assisting visitors to appreciate the place they are visiting. so the solution to the problem appears to be two-fold. First, there is a need to market the three destinations more effectively using the World Heritage status as the core attraction. second, visitors must gain more under- standing and appreciation of the contents of culture and heritage of the destina- tions through more effective interpretation. there are several marketing implications resulting from the socio-demographic characteristics of the WHs aware group of visitors. the Korean and Japanese visi- tors had much higher awareness of the World Heritage status of the destinations and were more likely to be positively influenced by these designations. it is suggested the marketers should put greater emphasis on advertising the WHs status of the destinations to these two markets. in addition, there existed a strong positive relationship between visitors’ awareness levels of the WHs status and intentions for revisiting. Prompt action is required to raise the international awareness levels of the World Heritage List inscriptions of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun, especially since 80% of repeat visitors were aware recognition of the WHs status of the destinations. independent travellers also tended to be more knowledgeable of the WHs status, perhaps having made more prior effort to become familiar with the destinations. Local stakeholders and tourism busi- ness owners should give greater attention to these independent travellers. in contrast, tour operators and travel agencies organising group tours are short
  • 12. Influence of Visitors’ Awareness of World Heritage Listings of information of the destinations’ World Heritage listing, or lack interest in promoting it heavily. this issue also requires immediate thought and attention. in summary, the World Heritage status appears to be a significant asset to support destination marketing. However, sites cannot completely depend on their listing to attract visitors. Moreover, site managers and marketers must provide more thorough and professional interpretation of the underlying culture to help visitors better comprehend what they are experiencing. in fact, it is the intrinsic content and quality of the sites that really matters rather than the listing itself. the findings of this study provide important insights for mar- keting and managing other WHs such as Macao. Further research is needed on different types of WHs in other countries to more fully explore the impact of World Heritage status on visitor motivations and satisfaction. Acknowledgements the authors would like to express sincere gratitude to the Department of tourism Management of Anhui university (China) for helping to collect the data and providing a part of the funds. the authors especially would like to thank Professor shangzheng Zhang of the Department of tourism Management at Anhui university for his great contribution to the completion of the on-site sur- veys in Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun. the authors also thank the Anhui tourism Administration and Huangshan international Airport for their assistance. Correspondence Any correspondence should be directed to Cheng Yan Department of Q5 recreation, sports and tourism, university of illinois at urbana-Champaign, Champaign, iL, usA (yanc@purdue.edu). References Bandarine, F. (2002) Foreword. World Heritage Manuals 1, 4. eigner, J. (1939) the enchanting beauty of Huang shan. The  China  Journal 31, 134–142. Hall, C.M. and Piggin, r. (2001) tourism and World Heritage in oeCD countries. Tourism  Recreation Research 26 (1), 103–105. Hall, C.M. and Piggin, r. (2002) tourism business knowledge of world heritage sites. International Journal of Tourism Research 4 (5), 401–411. Hers, J. (1935) the sacred mountains of China. Huang shan and how to get there. The  China Journal 22, 311–316. iuCN. (1990) Mount Huangshan and historic sites (China). World Heritage Nomination  Report. on WWW at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/547. Accessed 20.9.05. Kerstetter, D.L., Confer, J.J. and Graefe, A.r. (2001) An exploration of the specialization concept within the context of heritage tourism. Journal  of  Travel  Research 39 (3), 267–274. Kotler, P., Bowen, J.t. and Makens, J.C. (2005) Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism. New Jersey: Pearson education. Light, D., Prentice, C., Ashworth, G.J. and Larkham, J. (1994) Who Consumes the Heritage  Product? Implications for European Tourism. London: routledge. Moscardo, G., Green, D. and Greenwood, t. (2001) How great is the Great Barrier reef! tourists’ knowledge and understanding of the World Heritage status of the Great Barrier reef. Tourism Recreation Research 26 (1), 19–25. Nicholls, s. and Vogt, C. (2004) Heeding the call for heritage tourism. Parks  Recreations 39 (9), 38–49. Pedersen, A. (2002) tourism impacts and problems. World Heritage Manuals, 1, 29–31. Q4
  • 13. Journal of Heritage Tourism Peleggi, M. (1996) National heritage and global tourism in thailand. Annals of Tourism  Research 23 (2), 432–448. Q4 shackley, M. (1998) Visitor Management: Case Studies from World Heritage Sites. Butterworth Heinemann: oxford. silberberg, t. (1995) Cultural tourism and business opportunity for museums and herit- age sites. Tourism Management 16 (5), 361–365. Q4 uNesCo (1976) the effects of tourism on socio-cultural values. Annals  of  Tourism  Research 4, 74–105. Q4 uNesCo (1990) Mount  Huangshan. on WWW at http:/ /whc.unesco.org/en/list/547. Accessed 28.8.05. uNesCo. (2000) Xidi and Hongcun. on WWW at http:/ /whc.unesco.org/en/list/1002. Accessed 28.8.05. uNesCo. (2005) Mostar, Macao and Biblical vestiges in israel are among the 17 cultural sites inscribed on uNesCo’s World Heritage List. on WWW at http:/ /whc.unesco. org/en/news/135. Accessed 30.8.05. Q4