Heads up competition between REST and CSOM. Who's going to win???

1. Client Side
Development – REST or
CSOM
Mark Rackley
Solutions Architect
Level: Intermediate

2. About Mark Rackley
•
•
•
•
•
18+ years software
architecture and
development experience
SharePoint Junkie since
2007
Event Organizer
Blogger, Writer, Speaker
Bacon aficionado
•
@mrackley
•
http://www.sharepointhillbilly.com

3. Agenda
•
Pre-Game Highlights
– What is CSOM and REST?
•
First Quarter
– API Coverage
•
Second Quarter
– Platforms and Standards
•
Third Quarter
– Ease of Use / Flexibility
•
Fourth Quarter
– Batch Processing / Performance

4. http://www.pluralsight.com/training/Courses/TableOfContents/
sharepoint-2013-client-object-model-rest
ROB WINDSOR - SHAREPOINT
2013 DEVELOPMENT: CLIENT
OBJECT MODEL AND REST
API.

5. CLIENT SIDE OBJECT
MODEL (CSOM)

6. •
•
•
•
Client Side Object Model
Rookie Year:
2010
API used when building
remote applications
Introduced in SharePoint 2010
Designed to be similar to Server
Object Model
Three implementations
• .NET managed, Silverlight,
JavaScript
Communication with SharePoint
done in batches

7. JavaScript Client Object Model (JSOM)
context = SP.ClientContext.get_current();
var speakerList = context.get_web().get_lists().getByTitle("Vendors");
var camlQuery = SP.CamlQuery.createAllItemsQuery();
this.listItems = speakerList.getItems(camlQuery);
context.load(listItems);
context.executeQueryAsync(ReadListItemSucceeded, ReadListItemFailed);
function ReadListItemSucceeded(sender, args) {
var enumerator = listItems.getEnumerator();
var options = "<option value='0'>(None)</option>";
while (enumerator.moveNext()) {
var listItem = enumerator.get_current();
var Vendor = listItem.get_item('Vendor');
var ID = listItem.get_id();
options += "<option value='"+ ID +"'>"+Vendor+"</option>";
}
$("select[title='<Field Display Name>']").append(options);
}
function ReadListItemFailed(sender, args) {
alert('Request failed. ' + args.get_message() + 'n' + args.get_stackTrace());
}

8. SHAREPOINT REST

9. • Each resource or set of
resources is addressable
•
•
•
http://<site url>/_api/web
http://<site
url>/_api/web/lists
http://<site
url>/_api/web/lists/getByTitle(
‘Customers’)
• Operations on resources
map to HTTP Verbs
REST
Rookie Year:
2010
Data-centric web services
based on the Open Data
Protocol (OData)
•
GET, PUT, POST, DELETE, …
• Results from service
returned in AtomPub (XML)
or JavaScript Object
Notation (JSON) format

10. REST Service Access Points
•
Site
– http://server/site/_api/site
•
Web
– http://server/site/_api/web
•
User Profile
– http://
server/site/_api/SP.UserProfiles.PeopleManager
•
Search
– http:// server/site/_api/search
•
Publishing
– http:// server/site/_api/publishing

11. SHAREPOINT 2010 REST
var call = $.ajax({
url: "http://<Url To Site>/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/Vendors?$select=Vendor,Id&$top=1000",
type: "GET",
dataType: "json",
headers: {
Accept: "application/json;odata=verbose"
}
});
call.done(function (data,textStatus, jqXHR){
var options = "<option value='0'>(None)</option>";
for (index in data.d.results) //results may exist in data.d
{
options += "<option value='"+ data.d.results[index].Id +"'>"+data.d.results[index].Title+"</option>";
}
$("select[title='<Field Display Name>']").append(options);
});
call.fail(function (jqXHR,textStatus,errorThrown){
alert("Error retrieving Tasks: " + jqXHR.responseText);
});

12. SHAREPOINT 2013 REST
var call = $.ajax({
url: _spPageContextInfo.webAbsoluteUrl + "/_api/Web/Lists/GetByTitle('ListName')/items",
type: "GET",
dataType: "json",
headers: {
Accept: "application/json;odata=verbose"
}
});
call.done(function (data,textStatus, jqXHR){
var options = "<option value='0'>(None)</option>";
for (index in data.d.results)
{
options += "<option value='"+ data.d.results[index].Id +"'>"+data.d.results[index].Title+"</option>";
}
$("select[title='<Field Display Name>']").append(options);
});
call.fail(function (jqXHR,textStatus,errorThrown){
alert("Error retrieving Tasks: " + jqXHR.responseText);
});

13. REST and CSOM Behind the
Scenes

14. API Coverage
FIRST QUARTER

15. REST’s Roster
•
•
•
•
•
Sites, Webs, Features, Event Receivers,
Site Collections
Lists, List Items, Fields, Content Types,
Views, Forms, IRM
Files, Folders
Users, Roles, Groups, User Profiles, Feeds
Search

16. It‟s good!
FIELD GOAL FOR REST!

17. CSOM’s Roster
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sites, Webs, Features, Event Receivers, Site
Collections
Lists, List Item s, Fields, Content Types, Views, Forms,
IRM
Files, Folders
Users, Roles, Groups, User Profiles, Feeds
Web Parts
Search
Taxonomy
Workflow
E-Discovery
Analytics
Business Data

18. And the extra point…. Is good!
TOUCHDOWN CSOM!

19. 0 0:0 0
CSOM
QTR
REST
7
1
3

20. Platforms and Standards
SECOND QUARTER

21. REST’s Playbook
“REST is something Roy Fielding wrote back in 2000 that described a
way to share data over HTTP. Unfortunately companies created very
different implementation of RESTful services so a bunch got together
to define an agreed upon protocol called the Open Data Protocol, also
known as OData). The OData spec defines the data formats returned
as well as the specific vocabularies used to interact with OData
services. Each vendor then implemented it on their own technology
stack. Microsoft did this and called their OData product WCF Data
Services (notice the URL is actually odata.aspx on MSDN). SharePoint
2013's REST interface is built using WCF Data Services 5.0 which
implements the OData v3.0 specification. Unfortunately the SharePoint
2013 implementation does not include everything the spec states, but
it's pretty close.”
Read more at http://www.andrewconnell.com/blog/sharepoint-2013csom-vs.-rest-...-my-preference-and-why

22. REST’s Playbook
MSDN Magazine - Understanding and Using the
SharePoint 2013 REST Interface
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dn198245.aspx
Use OData query operations in SharePoint
REST requests
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/fp142385.aspx
Another field goal for REST!

23. CSOM’s Playbook
.NET, Silverlight, JavaScript
CSOM responds with a field goal!

24. REST’s Playbook
•
Platform independent
– PHP, Java, JavaScript, .NET, etc.. Etc
•
•
Many Libraries to choose from that
support oData
Test queries in browser
– Chrome app PostMan
REST ends the quarter strong
with Another field goal!

25. 0 0:0 0
CSOM
10
REST
QTR
2
9

26. SPServices
HALF-TIME SHOW!

27. SPServices
jQuery library that wraps SharePoint‟s .asmx
Web Services in easy to call methods
•
Pros
– Shorter learning curve for those already comfortable with
jQuery
– Cross site access
– More universal Anonymous Access
– Works in SharePoint 2007
•
Cons
– .asmx web services have been deprecated
– Results returned as XML that must be manually parsed
http://spservices.codeplex.com

28. SPServices
$().SPServices({
operation: "GetListItems",
async: true,
listName: "Vendors",
CAMLViewFields: "<ViewFields><FieldRef Name='Vendor' /></ViewFields>",
CAMLQuery: "<Query><Where><Neq><FieldRef Name='ID' /><Value
Type='Number'>0</Value></Neq></Where></Query>";,
completefunc: function(xData, Status) {
var options = "<option value='0'>(None)</option>“
$(xData.responseXML).SPFilterNode("z:row").each(function() {
var Vendor = ($(this).attr("ows_Vendor"));
var ID = $(this).attr("ows_ID");
options += "<option value='"+ ID +"'>"+Vendor+"</option>";
});
$("select[title='<Field Display Name>']").append(options);
}});

29. Ease of Use / Flexibility
THIRD QUARTER

30. Working with SCOM
CAML
'<Query><Where>' +
'<Or><Or><And><Geq><FieldRef Name="StartDate" /><Value IncludeTimeValue="TRUE"
Type="DateTime"> 2013-11-01 „+
„</Value></Geq><Leq><FieldRef Name="StartDate" /><Value IncludeTimeValue="TRUE"
Type="DateTime"> 2013-12-31 '+
'</Value></Leq></And><And><Geq><FieldRef Name="DueDate" /><Value
IncludeTimeValue="TRUE" Type="DateTime"> 2013-11-01 '+
'</Value></Geq><Leq><FieldRef Name="DueDate" /><Value IncludeTimeValue="TRUE"
Type="DateTime">‟ 2013-12-31‟</Value></Leq></And></Or>' +
'<And><Geq><FieldRef Name="DueDate" /><Value IncludeTimeValue="TRUE"
Type="DateTime">' 2013-12-31'</Value></Geq><Leq><FieldRef Name="StartDate" /><Value
IncludeTimeValue="TRUE" Type="DateTime"> 2013-11-01 '+
'</Value></Leq></And></Or>' +
'</Where></Query>'

31. Working with SCOM
CAML
There‟s a flag on the play

32. Working with REST
•
Simplified Queries
((StartDate ge „2013-11-01‟ and StartDate le „2013-12-31‟) or
(DueDate ge „2013-11-01‟ and DueDate le „2013-12-31‟) or
(DueDate ge ' 2013-12-31 ' and StartDate le „2013-11-01‟))

33. Working with REST
Touchdown!!
2 Point Conversion is good!!!

34. Working with CSOM
Easier learning curve for .NET Devs
Similar to Server Object Model
Compilation in non JavaScript implementations

35. It‟s good!
FIELD GOAL FOR CSOM!

36. 0 0:0 0
CSOM
QTR
REST
13
3
17

37. Batch Processing/Performance
F0URTH QUARTER

38. CSOM Batch Processing
•
•
Batch Updates
Batch Exception Handling
– One call to server to handle try, catch, finally

39. CSOM Batch Processing
Batch Insert
function CreateListItems(objArray) {
var itemArray = [];
var clientContext = SP.ClientContext.get_current();
var oList = clientContext.get_web().get_lists().getByTitle('ListName');
for(index in objArray){
var curObject = itemArray[index];
var itemCreateInfo = new SP.ListItemCreationInformation();
var oListItem = oList.addItem(itemCreateInfo);
oListItem.set_item('Title', curObject.title);
oListItem.update();
itemArray[i] = oListItem;
clientContext.load(itemArray[i]);
}
clientContext.executeQueryAsync(onQuerySucceeded, onQueryFailed);
}

40. CSOM Batch Processing
Batch Exception Handling
scope = new SP.ExceptionHandlingScope(context);
var scopeStart = scope.startScope();
var scopeTry = scope.startTry();
list = web.get_lists().getByTitle("Tasks");
context.load(list);
scopeTry.dispose();
var scopeCatch = scope.startCatch();
var lci = new SP.ListCreationInformation();
lci.set_title("Tasks");
lci.set_quickLaunchOption(SP.QuickLaunchOptions.on);
lci.set_templateType(SP.ListTemplateType.tasks);
list = web.get_lists().add(lci);
scopeCatch.dispose();
var scopeFinally = scope.startFinally();
list = web.get_lists().getByTitle("Tasks");
context.load(list);
scopeFinally.dispose();
scopeStart.dispose();
context.executeQueryAsync(success, fail);

41. CSOM Batch Processing
TOUCHDOWN!

42. REST Batch Processing
FUMBLE!

43. REST vs. CSOM Performance
•
REST is “chattier”
– No batching
•
CSOM returns more data
– Bigger packets
•
REST can return array of JSON objects
– Can feed array directly to libraries without
transformation or iteration

44. It‟s good!
FIELD GOAL FOR REST!!

45. 0 0:0 0
CSOM
QTR
REST
20
4
20

46. Anonymous Access
OVERTIME!

47. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaevans/archive/2013/10/24/whatevery-developer-needs-to-know-about-sharepoint-apps-csomand-anonymous-publishing-sites.aspx
KIRK EVANS - WHAT EVERY
DEVELOPER NEEDS TO KNOW
ABOUT SHAREPOINT APPS,
CSOM, AND ANONYMOUS
PUBLISHING SITES

48. REST & CSOM Anonymous Access
On-Premises

49. REST & CSOM Anonymous Access
On-Premises
•
According to Microsoft “Not Advisable”
– Exposes too much information to nosey people
– Opens you up to DoS attacks
•
Reality
– SPServices can be used by nosey people (can’t turn it
off)
– Everyone is open to a DoS attack

50. REST & CSOM Anonymous Access
Office 365
Anonymous Access with REST* or CSOM is
not possible in Office 365
*It Depends

51. CSOM Anonymous
•
Blocked by default
– GetItems and GetChanges on SPLists
– GetChanges and GetSubwebsForCurrentUser on SPWebs
– GetChanges on SPSites
•
Use PowerShell to enable
$webapp = Get-SPWebApplication "http://WebAppUrl"
$webapp.ClientCallableSettings.AnonymousRestrictedTypes.Remove([micros
oft.sharepoint.splist], "GetItems")
$webapp.Update()

52. REST Anonymous
Search in REST
Waldek Mastykarz - Configuring SharePoint 2013 Search REST
API for anonymous users
http://blog.mastykarz.nl/configuring-sharepoint-2013search-rest-api-anonymous-users/

53. FIELD GOAL REST!!!!!!!!
REST WINS!

54. 0 0:0 0
CSOM
QTR
REST
20
OT
23

55. Game Highlights
CSOM
More API Coverage Than REST
Designed to be similar to .NET
Object Model, more comfortable
for .NET Devs
Handles batch processing Well
CAML still sucks
Anonymous possible but not
advised
REST

56. Game Highlights
CSOM
REST
More API Coverage Than REST
NO MORE CAML!
Designed to be similar to .NET
Object Model, more comfortable
for .NET Devs
Platform independent,
REST/oData play well with other
libraries
Handles batch processing Well
Easy testing in browser using URL
CAML still sucks
Can perform better than CSOM
Anonymous possible but not
advised
Anonymous search works well,
other anonymous possible as well
but not advised

57. There are no stupid ones…
QUESTIONS??