Commnets by Ricardo V. Lago on th papper :"THE ANGUISH OF CENTRAL BANKING:ANOTHER LOOK AT THE GREAT US INFLATION AND ITS AFTERMATH " by Alex Cukierman
The Fifthteen Dubrovnik Economic Conference organised by the National Bank of Croatia
NO1 Certified kala jadu karne wale ka contact number kala jadu karne wale bab...
The Anguish of Central Banking: Exploring Different Approaches to Monetary Policy by Fed Chairs Burns, Volcker, Greenspan and Martin
1. THE ANGUISH OF CENTRAL BANKING:ANOTHER LOOK AT THE GREAT US INFLATION AND ITS AFTERMATHby Alex Cukierman Comments by Ricardo V. Lago
2. THE ANGUISH OF CENTRAL BANKING:ANOTHER LOOK AT THE GREAT US INFLATION AND ITS AFTERMATHby Alex Cukierman http://www.hnb.hr/dub-konf/15-konferencija/paper-cukierman.pdf
3.
4.
5. Arthur F. Burns (1970 -1978 / Nixon , Ford , Carter ) “RECESSION AVOIDANCE PREFERENCE”
6. Burns’ most famous quote “the Federal Reserve should not be expected to cope with inflation single-handedly. The only effective answer, in his opinion, lay in some form of incomes policy”
7. G. William Miller (1978 -1979 / Carter ) “RECESSION AVOIDANCE PREFERENCE”
8.
9. William McChesney Martin(1951 -1970 / Truman ,Eisenhower , Kennedy , Johnson , Nixon ) “INFLATION AVERSION PREFERENCE”
14. During the 1950s, Greenspan was one of the members of Ayn Rand's inner circle, who read Atlas Shrugged while it was being written
15. Greenspan’s split personality On the one hand , he pursued ultra –activist monetary policy . He was the ultimate interventionist On the other , he confused the real world with Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged” word . “Rational Self-interest” is the best form of natural and spontaneous regulation
16. Greenspan neglected important contributions to Economics Separation between ownership and control Principal /Agent Problem Asymmetric Information --------------------------------------------------- Outcome : The “managers” did indeed pursued “rational self interest” at the expense of the shareholders , creditors , and taxpayers Admission : Recently , Greenspan has yielded that he was wrong : the real world is not quite as simple as Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged”
17.
18. This is a very controversial claim : to say the least “Greenspan’s contribution was that he did not spoil the hard earned stability under Volcker and utilised it to devote more of the policy effort to stabilization of the real economic activity without endangering price stability” ( page 23 , 1st paragraph)
19. Conclusion that I would have expected Four different versions of Casablanca corresponding to four different Humphrey Bogarts : Burns Bogart Volcker Bogart Greenspan Bogart Martin Bogart
20.
21. Rather the policy rules of both Volcker or Greespan arose as endogenous reactions to the main problem monetary policy had to tackle when they were appointed .Volcker was appointed when inflation came to be considered the number one economic problem . So he developed a conservative rule .Greenspan came into office when inflation has been stabilized under Volcker .Therefore , he could deploy more efforts to the unemployment objective in the Fed dual mandate
24. Does it really matter ? If we take Cukierman’s conclusion at face value : there is only one Casablanca Isn’t Money far too important to leave it to the discretion of central bankers all of which will be victims of the circunstances Why not go back to a Bretton Woods II System : with Dollar-Gold and /or Euro-Gold Standard Wouldn’t it be better that central bankers focus exclusively on monitoring and ensuring the solvency of the financial system and stay away from the money supply