1. Champions for Education Northern Kentucky Community Summit Covington, KY November, 2007 ACHIEVEMENT IN AMERICA
2. First, some good news. After more than a decade of stagnant or growing gaps, we appear to be turning the corner.
3. NAEP Reading, 9 Year-Olds: Record Performance for All Groups Source : National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP 2004 Trends in Academic Progress Note: Long-Term Trends NAEP
4. NAEP Math, 9 Year-Olds: Record Performance for All Groups Source : National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP 2004 Trends in Academic Progress Note: Long-Term Trends NAEP
8. Tell them to take a look at the results of a decade of effort in mathematics…
9. 1996 NAEP Grade 4 Math by Race/Ethnicity, Nation Source : National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde/
10. 2007 NAEP Grade 4 Math by Race/Ethnicity, Nation Source : National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde/
11. NAEP Grade 4 Math Low-Income Students, Nation 1996 compared to 2007 Source : National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde/
13. NAEP Grade 8 Math, Kentucky Average Scale Scores Over Time, All Students Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde/ * Accommodations for students with disabilities and English language learners not permitted. Proficient Scale Score: 299
14. NAEP Grade 4 Math, Percent Below Basic Over Time, All Students, Kentucky Source : National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde * Accommodations for students with disabilities and English language learners not permitted.
15. NAEP Grade 8 Math, Percent Below Basic Over Time, All Students, Kentucky Source : National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde * Accommodations for students with disabilities and English language learners not permitted.
22. High School Achievement: Math and Science: NAEP Long-Term Trends Source: NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress.
23. But it turns out—at least in math-- that all of that growth is attributable to stronger math skills in students coming up from elementary school. Value Added in High School Math Actually Declined During the Nineties
24. Value Added Declining in High School Math... Scale Score Growth, From Age 13 to Age 17 Source : NCES, 1999. Trends in Academic Progress. Data from Long Term Trend NAEP Note: Scale score gains reflect the difference between the scale scores of 17-year-olds and the scale scores of 13-year-olds four years prior.
25. ... Still Scale Score Growth, From Grade 8 to Grade 12 Source : NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde Note: Scale score gains reflect the difference between the scale scores of 12 th Graders and the scale scores of 8 th Graders four years prior.
26. Reading: Students Entering High School Better Prepared, But Leaving Worse Total= 290 Total= 288 Source : NCES, 1999. Trends in Academic Progress. Data from Long Term Trend NAEP
38. PISA 2003: US 15 Year-Olds Rank Near The End Of The Pack Among 29 OECD Countries Source : NCES, 2005, International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics, Literacy and Problem Solving: 2003 PISA Results. NCES 2005-003
40. 2003: U.S. Ranked 24 th out of 29 OECD Countries in Mathematics Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results , data available at http://www.oecd.org/
41. Problems are not limited to our high-poverty and high-minority schools . . .
42. U.S. Ranks Low in the Percent of Students in the Highest Achievement Level (Level 6) in Math Source : Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results , data available at http://www.oecd.org/
43. U.S. Ranks 23 rd out of 29 OECD Countries in the Math Achievement of the Highest-Performing Students* * Students at the 95 th Percentile Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results , data available at http://www.oecd.org/
44. U.S. Ranks 23 rd out of 29 OECD Countries in the Math Achievement of High-SES Students Source : Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results , data available at http://www.oecd.org/
46. PISA 2003: Problem-Solving, US Ranks 24 th Out of 29 OECD Countries Source : NCES, 2005, International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics, Literacy and Problem Solving: 2003 PISA Results. NCES 2005-003
48. PISA 2003: Gaps in Performance Of U.S.15 Year-Olds Are Among the Largest of OECD Countries * Of 29 OECD countries, based on scores of students at the 5 th and 95 th percentiles. Source : Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results , data available at http://www.oecd.org/
49. These gaps begin before children arrive at the schoolhouse door. But, rather than organizing our educational system to ameliorate this problem, we organize it to exacerbate the problem.
50. How? By giving students who arrive with less, less in school, too.
51. Some of these “lesses” are a result of choices that policymakers make.
52. Nation: Inequities in State and Local Revenue Per Student Source: The Education Trust, The Funding Gap 2005. Data are for 2003 Gap High Poverty vs. Low Poverty Districts -$907 per student High Minority vs. Low Minority Districts -$614 per student
53. But some of the most devastating “lesses” are a function of choices that we educators make.
55. Students in Poor Schools Receive ‘A’s for Work That Would Earn ‘Cs’ in Affluent Schools Source : Prospects (ABT Associates, 1993), in “Prospects: Final Report on Student Outcomes”, PES, DOE, 1997.
57. African American, Latino & Native American high school graduates are less likely to have been enrolled in a full college prep track percent in college prep Source : Jay P. Greene, Public High School Graduation and College Readiness Rates in the United States, Manhattan Institute, September 2003. Table 8. 2001 high school graduates with college-prep curriculum. Full College Prep track is defined as at least: 4 years of English, 3 years of math, 2 years of natural science, 2 years of social science and 2 years of foreign language
59. More Classes in High-Poverty, High-Minority Schools Taught By Out-of-Field Teachers *Teachers lacking a college major or minor in the field. Data for secondary-level core academic classes. Source: Richard M. Ingersoll, University of Pennsylvania. Original analysis for the Ed Trust of 1999-2000 Schools and Staffing Survey . High poverty Low poverty High minority Low minority Note: High Poverty school-50% or more of the students are eligible for free/reduced price lunch. Low-poverty school -15% or fewer of the students are eligible for free/reduced price lunch. High-minority school - 50% or more of the students are nonwhite. Low-minority school- 15% or fewer of the students are nonwhite.
60. Poor and Minority Students Get More Inexperienced* Teachers Source: National Center for Education Statistics, “Monitoring Quality: An Indicators Report,” December 2000. *Teachers with 3 or fewer years of experience. High poverty Low poverty High minority Low minority Note: High poverty refers to the top quartile of schools with students eligible for free/reduced price lunch. Low poverty-bottom quartile of schools with students eligible for free/reduced price lunch. High minority-top quartile; those schools with the highest concentrations of minority students. Low minority-bottom quartile of schools with the lowest concentrations of minority students
61. Results are devastating. Kids who come in a little behind, leave a lot behind. And those patterns continue into…and through higher education, as well.
62. College Graduates by Age 24 Source: Tom Mortenson, Postsecondary Educational Opportunity..
69. Frankford Elementary Closing Gaps, Grade 5 Reading Source: Delaware Department of Education, DSTP Online Reports, http://dstp.doe.k12.de.us/DSTPmart/default.asp
70. Frankford Elementary Closing Gaps, Grade 5 Math Source: Delaware Department of Education, DSTP Online Reports, http://dstp.doe.k12.de.us/DSTPmart/default.asp
71. Frankford Elementary Higher Proficiency Rates than the State, 2005 Grade 3 Reading Source: Delaware Department of Education, DSTP Online Reports, http://dstp.doe.k12.de.us/DSTPmart/default.asp
72. Frankford Elementary Higher Proficiency Rates than the State, 2005 Grade 3 Math Source: Delaware Department of Education, DSTP Online Reports, http://dstp.doe.k12.de.us/DSTPmart/default.asp
83. Elmont Memorial Higher Percentage of Students Meeting Graduation Requirements than the State, Class of 2004 Regents English Source: New York State School Report Card, http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/irts/reportcard/
84. Elmont Memorial Higher Percentage of Students Meeting Graduation Requirements than the State, Class of 2004 Regents Math Source: New York State School Report Card, http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/irts/reportcard/
93. But education is NOT like immunization. Early success does not prevent later school failure. So…
94. #2. We’ve got to get serious about our high schools. And that starts by getting clear about goals.
95. Even when they start with high drop out rates, high impact high schools focus on preparing all kids for college and careers Education Trust 2005 study, “Gaining Traction, Gaining Ground.”
96. That’s Good, Because Education Pays: Annual Earnings of 25-34 yr-olds by Attainment Source: US bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of the Census, Current Population Survey, March 2002
97. Growing Need for Higher Levels of Education: Projections of Education Shortages and Surpluses in 2012 Associates Degree Some College Shortage Surplus Source: Analysis by Anthony Carnevale, 2006 of Current Population Survey (1992-2004) and Census Population Projection Estimates Bachelor’s Degree
98. Even if you have your doubts, NEW STUDY FROM ACT: College ready, workforce training ready=same thing
99. #3. Higher performing secondary schools put all kids—not just some—in a demanding high school core curriculum.
100. Single biggest predictor post-high school success is QUALITY AND INTENSITY OF HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM Cliff Adelman, Answers in the Tool Box , U.S. Department of Education.
103. Low Quartile Students Gain More From College Prep Courses* Source: USDOE, NCES, Vocational Education in the United States: Toward the Year 2000, in Issue Brief: Students Who Prepare for College and Vocation *Grade 8-grade 12 test score gains based on 8th grade achievement.
105. Challenging Curriculum Results in Lower Failure Rates, Even for Lowest Achievers Source : SREB, “Middle Grades to High School: Mending a Weak Link”. Unpublished Draft, 2002. Ninth-grade English performance, by high/low level course, and eighth-grade reading achievement quartiles
109. Putting students in courses with the right names is not enough. Orange juice or orange drink?
110. Problem: US went from standards to tests without stopping at curriculum.
111. Grade 10 Writing Assignment A frequent theme in literature is the conflict between the individual and society. From literature you have read, select a character who struggled with society. In a well-developed essay, identify the character and explain why this character’s conflict with society is important.
112. Grade 10 Writing Assignment Write a composition of at least 4 paragraphs on Martin Luther King’s most important contribution to this society. Illustrate your work with a neat cover page. Neatness counts.
114. #5. Good schools know how much teachers matter, and they act on that knowledge.
115. Students in Dallas Gain More in Math with Effective Teachers: One Year Growth From 3 rd -4 th Grade Source : Heather Jordan, Robert Mendro, and Dash Weerasinghe, The Effects of Teachers on Longitudinal Student Achievement , 1997.
116. LOW ACHIEVING STUDENTS IN TN GAIN MORE WITH EFFECTIVE TEACHERS: One Year Growth Sanders and Rivers, Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Academic Achievement, 1998.
117. Cumulative Teacher Effects On Students’ Math Scores in Dallas (Grades 3-5) Source: Heather Jordan, Robert Mendro, and Dash Weerasinghe, The Effects of Teachers on Longitudinal Student Achievement , 1997. Beginning Grade 3 Percentile Rank= 55 Beginning Grade 3 Percentile Rank= 57
119. Good teachers matter a lot. But some groups of kids don’t get their fair share of quality teachers.
120. More Classes in High-Poverty, High-Minority Schools Taught By Out-of-Field Teachers *Teachers lacking a college major or minor in the field. Data for secondary-level core academic classes. Source: Richard M. Ingersoll, University of Pennsylvania. Original analysis for the Ed Trust of 1999-2000 Schools and Staffing Survey . High poverty Low poverty High minority Low minority Note: High Poverty school-50% or more of the students are eligible for free/reduced price lunch. Low-poverty school -15% or fewer of the students are eligible for free/reduced price lunch. High-minority school - 50% or more of the students are nonwhite. Low-minority school- 15% or fewer of the students are nonwhite.
121. Poor and Minority Students Get More Inexperienced* Teachers Source: National Center for Education Statistics, “Monitoring Quality: An Indicators Report,” December 2000. *Teachers with 3 or fewer years of experience. High poverty Low poverty High minority Low minority Note: High poverty refers to the top quartile of schools with students eligible for free/reduced price lunch. Low poverty-bottom quartile of schools with students eligible for free/reduced price lunch. High minority-top quartile; those schools with the highest concentrations of minority students. Low minority-bottom quartile of schools with the lowest concentrations of minority students
131. Gutsy school and district leaders do not need you to go fuzzy on them. They need—and use—the leverage that ambitious policy and aggressive advocacy provides to move change further, faster.
132. The Education Trust Download this Presentation www.edtrust.org Washington, DC: 202-293-1217 Oakland, CA: 510-465-6444
Notes de l'éditeur
In addition, when Richard Ingersoll analyzed the SAS data, he found that these same schls are more likely to have a higher percentage of classes being taught by tchrs without a major or minor in the field for which they are teaching. The results are particularly striking in high poverty schls where there is a difference of 13 percentage points. Definitions High Poverty-A school where 50% or more of the students are eligible for free/reduced price lunch Low-poverty-A school where 15% or fewer of the students are eligible for free/reduced price lunch High-minority-A school where 50% or more of the students are nonwhite. Low-minority-A school where 15% or fewer of the students are nonwhite.
Schls with higher proportions of poor and minority students have more inexperienced tchrs. If we take a look at the graph, we see that in high poverty schls almost double the amount of tchrs have less than three years of experience. The same is also true for high minority schls. High poverty-top quartile of schools with students eligible for free/reduced price lunch. Low poverty-bottom quartile of schools with students eligible for free/reduced price lunch. High minority-top quartile; those schools with the highest concentrations of minority students. Low minority-bottom quartile of schools with the lowest concentrations of minority students
In addition, when Richard Ingersoll analyzed the SAS data, he found that these same schls are more likely to have a higher percentage of classes being taught by tchrs without a major or minor in the field for which they are teaching. The results are particularly striking in high poverty schls where there is a difference of 13 percentage points. Definitions High Poverty-A school where 50% or more of the students are eligible for free/reduced price lunch Low-poverty-A school where 15% or fewer of the students are eligible for free/reduced price lunch High-minority-A school where 50% or more of the students are nonwhite. Low-minority-A school where 15% or fewer of the students are nonwhite.
Schls with higher proportions of poor and minority students have more inexperienced tchrs. If we take a look at the graph, we see that in high poverty schls almost double the amount of tchrs have less than three years of experience. The same is also true for high minority schls. High poverty-top quartile of schools with students eligible for free/reduced price lunch. Low poverty-bottom quartile of schools with students eligible for free/reduced price lunch. High minority-top quartile; those schools with the highest concentrations of minority students. Low minority-bottom quartile of schools with the lowest concentrations of minority students