This document summarizes an Upper Quinault River restoration project. It discusses the scientific background of the river's natural processes and how human impacts have degraded habitat. Specifically, it notes how the removal of large wood from floodplains and the river channel has led to instability. The presentation outlines threats like loss of side channels and roads in floodplains. It proposes a restoration approach using engineered logjams to reintroduce wood and stabilize the river over 20 years. An Alder Creek pilot project demonstrated success in restoring side channel complexity. Funding strategies and further restoration steps are discussed.
10. (Abbe & Montgomery 1996)
Initiation and evolution
of a natural logjam
A “Big” Guy
Scientific Foundation
11. Large wood is a structural
component of forest rivers
that directly influences
river morphology, channel
dynamics and forest
structure:
Large snags in river
Large trees in
floodplain = stability
Small snags in
river
Small trees in
floodplain =
instability
Scientific Foundation
(Fetherston 2005)
14. The Problem
1850 Today
Mature conifer floodplain, anabranching
river channel and extensive lateral side
channel network = stability and abundant
functional salmon habitat
Immature red alder floodplain, shallow
braided river channel and few lateral side
channels remain = unstable, limited
functional salmon habitat
15. Current pattern of floodplain forest development
Restore the natural pattern of floodplain forest development
Scientific Foundation
18. Why it matters….
• Blueback are genetically distinct from other
sockeye populations
• Run timing and spawning period are unique
compared to other sockeye populations
• Evolutionary Significant Unit
- a unique population under
federal ESA designation
• In danger of “virtual extinction
22. NPS and the Counties have
chronic maintenance issues
with roads, bridges, and
campgrounds from river
erosion, flooding, and
sediment deposition.
Graves Creek Road
Roads located in the
floodplain and resulting
emergency repairs have
harmful cumulative
impacts. Environmentally
sensitive alternatives for
access are needed to not
only prevent further habitat
degradation but to restore
riverine-forest functions.
30. Restoration will require…
Change from the Status Quo:
"It is common sense to take a method and try it. If it fails, admit it
frankly and try another. But above all, try something.”
— Franklin D. Roosevelt
Perseverance:
"It's a little like wrestling a gorilla. You don't quit when you're tired.
You quit when the gorilla is tired.” — Robert Strauss
Resolve to “stay the course”:
"Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed, is more
important than any other one thing.” — Abraham Lincoln
31. General Restoration Approach
• Natural processes based, landscape-scale
ecosystem restoration
• Incremental actions over the next 20 years in
order to achieve desired long term goals
• Cumulative benefits rather than cumulative
impacts
The Plan provides the alternative for 1) activities that
continue to impact habitat and 2) the current regulatory
framework overseeing land use and infrastructure
protection in the valley
32. Purpose of The Plan is to Provide
Direction and Guidance for Restoration
1. Provide the scientific foundation for habitat
restoration in the Quinault River Valley
2. Provide the general approach for restoration
3. Provide methods and procedures for
restoration
4. Provide the framework for prioritizing,
developing, and implementing projects
33. Restoration Strategy
“Promotes the preservation of natural
resources and remaining habitat in the short-
term while implementing a science based
foundation that will support sustainable
recovery of salmon and ecosystem function
over the long-term.”
48. QDNR Habitat Restoration Program
Quinault Department of Habitat Restoration consisting
of a multi-disciplined team:
- Fisheries Scientists - Forest ecologist
- Fluvial geomorphologist - Hydrologist
- Professional engineer - Project coordinator
- GIS specialist - Restoration technicians
49. ELJ Construction Only = $31,500 to $50,000 each
ELJ Cost (all elements included) = $137,000 each
ELJs Total (400) = $54,800,000
Floodplain Restoration Planting = $ 980,000
ELJ and Restoration Planting = $57 million
Infrastructure and land acquisition = $63 million
GRAND TOTAL = $120 MILLION
Restoration Costs
50. "There is nothing more difficult to take in hand,
more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain
in its success, than to take the lead in the
introduction of a new order of things.”
— Niccolo Machiavelli
The Prince (1532)
53. Quinault Climate Change –> End of century
• Similar climate to 5,000-6,000 years ago
• Surface air temperature 2 degrees warmer by end of
century
• Winter precipitation as rain increases 4-35%
• Increases in winter flooding to ratio and frequency of 20
year floods
• Reduced snowpack
• Olympic glaciers will be gone
• Summer base flows projected to decline 3 to 35%
• Stressors to salmon and forests
(Littell & Mantua 2009)
54. Quinault River Restoration Coalition
Government – Congressman Norm Dicks, Senator Patty Murray, Senator Maria Cantwell
Federal Partners – Olympic National Forest, Olympic National Park, Army Corp of
Engineers, US Geological Survey, US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries
Service
State Partners – Governor’s Salmon Recovery Office, Department of Natural Resources,
Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Ecology, Historical Preservation Office
Local Partners - Jefferson County, Grays Harbor County, Quinault Valley River Committee
NGOs – Wild Salmon Center, The Nature Conservancy, Mitsubishi Corporation, Olympic
National Park Associates, Washington Coast Sustainable Salmon Partnership, The Bullet
Foundation, Pacific Coast Salmon Coalition
55. Federal Lead Agency Designation
• QIN soliciting the BIA, Army Corp or NRCS to
act as lead federal agency for restoration
• Satisfies federal requirements for project
sponsor and serves as a liaison between QIN
and federal government
• “Streamlines” the bureaucratic federal process
to increase efficiency
• QIN achieves additional priority for restoration
in the valley since a federal action
56. Federal Lead Agency /
Quinault Indian Nation
Regulatory Agencies
(Federal, State, County)
Landowners
(Private, Federal, State, County)
Quinault Valley River
Committee
Quinault Valley Community
57. Federal and State Designations
• Wild and Scenic River Designation (pending)
• Wild Salmon Stronghold Designation
(Congressional 2010)
59. Project Prioritization
Flexibility: Other factors also influence timing of projects such as local
community interests and opportunity to implement restoration plan
elements during “emergency declarations”.
60. Project Development
Project Identification -> Landowner Agreement
Project Development -> Geomorphic Site Assessment -> Conceptual Design -> Hydraulic Modeling ->
Risk Assessment and Benefit Analysis -> Landowner Agreement
Engineering Plans and Specifications -> Landowner Approval -> Federal, State, County Permitting
ESA Consultation & Permitting -> Corp-USFWS Programmatic BO/SPIF -> Corp Nationwide Permit ->
Section 106 Cultural Resources -> State Historical Preservation Act -> Streamlined State HPA ->
County Shoreline Exemption -> NMFS Essential Fish Habitat -> Section 404 CWA
Materials Procurement -> Permitting -> Project Management -> Monitoring
Materials Storage and Staging -> Landowner Agreement -> Project Management -> Permitting
Construction -> Project Management -> Construction Oversight -> Final Inspection
Project Monitoring -> Landowner Agreement -> Project Management
65. Short term: The next 5 years
• Educate the local community and other stakeholders
• Formalize the QIN led coalition of restoration partners
• Review and provide recommendations to existing management
plans, land-use, and emergency infrastructure repair/protection
methods
• Develop the restoration program framework and program budget
• Secure funding to implement the restoration program
• Develop alternative land-use, access and infrastructure
management plans
• Initiate restoration actions directed to protect existing side channel
habitat and reduce HCMZ expansion
• Begin the reforestation process
66. • 35 project areas have been identified and
preliminary budgets developed
• 2 of these project areas are at the permit level
design and ready for final design, permitting and
implementation as funding is secured
• We are also working with Jefferson County and
Federal Highways on a road re-route for a
segment of the South Shore Road
• Nature conservancy on large land purchase in
JeffCo
Next Steps
67.
68.
69.
70. Option 1: Continuous ELJ crib revetment = treats approximately 250-300’ feet
Option 2: 5 flow deflector ELJs no less than 30’ x 30’ = treats approximately 700’
depending on required spacing and design needs
Both options: 200’ of riverbank width in treatment zone would be restored as
riparian area using conifer and other plantings.
71.
72. Economic Benefits
Restoration of the Quinault River can lead to the
recovery of sustainable natural resources and
expansion of a tourism based economy
• Restoration related jobs
• Improved fisheries opportunity
• Tourism
• Restoration science monitoring and research
• “Trickle thru dollars” for the local economy
74. NEPA, ESA Consultation and Permitting
Strategy
• Programmatic EA for restoration reach (10 year)
• Programmatic Biological Opinion (Corp-USFWS) for
ESA consultation
• Expedited Nationwide Permit (Army Corp)
• Essential Fish Habitat (Salmon) Consultation
• Streamlined HPA permitting and county shoreline
exemptions
• Expedited Section 404 Consultation (Clean Water Act)
75. Public Relations and Outreach Strategy
• Quinault Indian Nation
• Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission
• Wild Salmon Center
• Washington Coast Sustainable Salmon
Partnership
• Quinault Valley River Committee
76. Land Management & Conservation
Strategy
• QIN and The Nature Conservancy working to
develop a Land Conservation Strategy
• Conservation Areas and Easements
• Private forest owner conversion (DNR program)
• Riparian buffer zone reestablishment
• Monetary compensation for conversion of private
lands for conservation purposes
• Stewardship natural resource use protected
77. Wood Procurement Strategy
• Material source identification
• Timber sales (BIA, QIN, state, county)
• USFS “free use” program
• Materials storage and staging
• Materials inventory management
78. Restoration Monitoring Strategy
• Baseline ecological monitoring
• Project effectiveness monitoring
• Scientific and engineering design monitoring
• Required to satisfy land access agreement
with State of Washington and funding sources
• QIN and USGS investigating options for
monitoring program development
79. Funding Strategy
• QIN pursuing congressional appropriation
• Requires General Investigation Study by Army
Corp (Land Resources Development Act)
• A 3-5 year process culminating in the Army
Corp recommending congressional support for
the QIN restoration program
• Estimated costs (current) for all restoration
plan elements = $120 million
88. Conclusions
(BOR 2005; UQRSHP 2005)
• Constructed in 1973
• Reduced the river channel (EMZ)
width from 550 m to 100 m
• Forced the river to lose its
meandering tendency over a 20 year
period
• 200% increased hydraulic radius, 8x
greater sediment transport capacity,
and river bed incision and scour
• 300% increase in channel slope in the
bridge reach
• May have resulted in 2.5 miles of side
channel habitat loss in the reach
• Altered bank erosion and sediment
transport processes from the crossing
downriver for ~3.3 kilometers.
Channel Response
92. • Protect and preserve natural resources and functions of floodplains
• Avoid the long- and short-term environmental effects associated with the
occupancy and modification of floodplains
• Avoid direct and indirect support of floodplain development and actions
that could adversely affect the natural resources and functions of
floodplains or increase flood risks
• Restore natural floodplain values affected by land use activities within
floodplains
The Quinault Indian Nation and Government Agencies have a common
mandate to Conserve, rotect, and estore natural resources
93. Project Funding
Total project cost = $1.12 million
Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Fund = $466,563
Salmon Recovery Funding Board = $383,000
Washington Department of Natural Resources = $20,000
U.S. Forest Service Title 2 = $14,000
Wild Salmon Center = $15,000
Pacific Coast Salmon Coalition = $10,000
Jefferson County mitigation funds = $14,000
Quinault Indian Nation In-Kind = $ 181,437
Olympic National Forest In-Kind = $16,000
Olympic National Park Logs = $ Donation
94. Over the next 20 years
• Restore stable hardpoints inside and along the HCMZ
boundary
• Reduce erosion and HCMZ expansion
• Convert the wide, braided main channel to a deeper,
anabranching channel network separated by stable
forested islands
• Restore side channel and tributary stability
• Reestablish stands of mixed floodplain forests
• Restore stable islands and wildlife refugia in the HCMZ
• Complete restoration planting
• Carry-out land management plans and land acquisition
95. Erosion of old, large timber (green squares)
provides flow deflection and erosion control
along the river bank.
Queets RM32, 1985
98. Restoration defined…
Merriam-Webster:
1 : an act of restoring or the condition of being
restored: as a : a bringing back to a former
position or condition : b : a restoring to an
unimpaired or improved condition
2 : something that is restored; especially : a
representation or reconstruction of the original
form (as of a fossil or a building)
Repeated glaciations during the late Pleistocene affected landforms and set ecological boundaries for the succession of biological communities. The last glaciations likely had the largest influence on what this area and its ecosystem developed into. The last glaciation in the Quinault Valley is called the Chow Chow Glaciation; it advanced out of the Olympic Mountains to within about 12 km (7.5 mi) of the Pacific Ocean. (the slide is actually a glacial complex in Alaska, but is a reasonable representation of the Quinault-Queets-Humptulips complex). About 29,000 years ago the Chow Chow glacier began its gradual retreat across the coastal piedmont toward the Olympics.As the glacier retreated, the coastal plain filled with life and the dynamics of colonization, adaptation and succession progressed. While physical, erosional processes changed the landscape, stability was introduced through development of old-growth forests.
The glacial retreat stagnated at the foot of the Olympics about 18,000 years ago. During this pause, the terminal moraine that impounds Lake Quinault was formed. After the period of stagnation, the glacier continued its retreat up the narrow Quinault Valley and Lake Quinault formed behind the terminal moraine. As the glacier retreated, the Lake filled an expanding area until approximately 10,000 years ago the glacier had retreated to near the Forks and across the Big Creek channel and the Lake extended all the way from the moraine to the glacier base. As the glacier continued to recede and the river incising its channel through the terminal moraine, the surface elevation of the lake gradually declined and its surface area decreased. This slide shows the approximate rate of regression of the Lake down the Quinault Valley as the outlet channel was incised. As the glacier retreated and the lake receded, the exposed valley floor had a base of glacial outwash dominated by gravels and cobbles overlaid by lacustrine sediments; mostly very fine sediments like glacial flour.The down-valley progression of the lake shore was gradual, taking thousands of years and allowing channel processes and floodplain forests to develop to relative stability. Whether or not blueback were here before or during the last glaciation, once Lake Quinault formed, conditions to support sockeye and allow accumulation of adaptations to optimize survival in the local setting were available.
The BOR concluded this is likely what the Quinault Valley looked like in 1850. There are several physical similarities between this river and the UQR; narrow, contained valley with steep side slopes, glacial influence, glacial source along with snow and rain.(Early settlers and inhabitants of the region described the Upper Quinault River as a large stream that flowed between two rather narrow, heavily wooded banks.)Mature floodplain forests; mature forested islands.Narrow active channel.Channel containment by mature forest.Note the stable relict side and terrace channels. 3-4 hundred years old.Habitat complexity supports sub-population structure and resilience.By 1923 the manager of the Falls Creek Hatchery wrote, “In connection with observations in the territory drained by the Upper Quinault River, the constant shifting of the channels has been particularly noticed. It is worthy of note that this feature is a matter of comparatively recent years and has developed at an alarming rate during the past twenty years.”
Due to their sheer size and bouyancy resistance to transport down the river, the trees became hard points that formed the foundation for logjams to form
These logs collected smaller logs and over time grew into large logjams, some spanned the entire channel and were enormous in size.
This is the Upper Quinault River today.Lack of mature forest on the floodplain.Relatively wide active channel.Little evidence of containment.Lack of channel stability.We are all aware of the dynamic nature of the Upper River, and the dramatic channel changes that seem to occur every winter. We’ve observed the mainstem river inundating or destroying channels the Blueback use for spawning and the infrastructurethat continues to be at risk.There has been some debate over whether the condition of the Upper River is natural and normal for this kind of river, or if its current condition is the result of man’s activities in the Quinault Valley.We contracted with the US Bureau of Reclamation to conduct a detailed study of the condition of the Upper River and it’s salmon habitat-forming processes, and to determine whether there was evidence for historic changes in physical processes or habitats over time.
This figure shows the trend of historic run sizes.Run sizes in the early 1900’s were impressive. The average run size during 1908-1951 was approximately 250K.There was a 7-9 year cycle in abundance caused be ecosystem limits and processes; the result was the large runs were produced by small runs and the small runs were produced by large runs.Beginning in the early 1950’s, the cycling eroded and disappeared, and there has been a trend of continuous decline in run sizes ever since.Average production today is only about 14% of what it was prior to 1950.10 of the last 16 total run sizes (63%) have been less that the escapement goal.The 2006 and 2007total run sizes were the smallest on record (3,500 and 5,000).So, in terms of abundance and trends, the blueback population is severely depressed, and the declining trend is continuing.
Why blueback are so important:Five different studies of genetic differentiation using allozyme variation at polymorphic loci showed Quinault Blueback to be genetically distinct from other nearby populations; including Columbia River, Puget Sound, British Columbia, Frazer River, and Ozette stocks.
Magnitude of inundation during 50-100 year floods. Infrastructure inundation and maintenance issues in floodplain and on intermediate terrace surfaces…
Regardless of your opinions about the science of causes for current climate trends, we have some important realities staring us in the face.
The Anderson glacier, a remnant of the Chow Chow Glacier, has declined dramatically in the past few years. The decline has seemed to accelerate with time until finally
No, but if we don’t act the demise of blueback may be inevitable. The best preparation for large-scale trends is to restore diversity and resilience in the blueback population and its habitats. This will result from a focused restoration program to reverse the current trends and begin to restore stability
Short sited land management, trying to apply land use, forest management, and infrastructure practices that fall short and “ don’t work” in the Quinault. Hatcheries too… We’ve learned this from our own experiences and observations…stop treating the symptoms, we Must treat the disease.
The purpose of the plan is to provide a guiding document for restoration in the Quinault River valley; provide the restoration strategy fitting to the Quinault River valley
Following this strategy outlined in the Restoration plan we will incrementally restore the Quinault Valley over next century while implementing a shift from “status quo” management activities that result in cumulative impacts to incrementally restore the Quinault Valley over next century
Red alder conversion to black cottonwood and conifer; pasture land conversion to conifer -> especially within riparian zone along the river
(i.e. conservation easements, roadway setbacks,decomissioning and removal of process inhibiting structures)
Restoration will benefit the economies of the QIN and local stakeholders…
The Nation enjoys exclusive jurisdiction over fisheries resources and management within the boundaries of the Reservation and, as a Self-Regulating Tribe, also manages its own fisheries over a broad area outside the Reservation in a co-management relationship with the State of Washington.The Nation has developed an approach for management of its fisheries and natural resources that is science based and built on traditional-cultural foundations formed over millennia.
Pre-1850Quinault community and culture sustained by rich natural resources; blueback in particularSalmon harvested in-river at several locations using adaptive methods (nets, traps, spears and gaffs)Salmon used for subsistence, ceremony and a trade economyThe Quinault salmon (blueback) was a cultural icon and a source of reputation in the Northwest
EMZ is effective channel migration zone, MMZ mainstem migration zone, SMZ side channel migration zone, CMZ valley wall to valley wall, HCMZ historic channel migration zone…
<0.5 miles of habitat
The Quinault Indian Nation, Olympic National Park (CPR) Conserve, Protect, Restore. The responsibilities of both QIN and agencies are irrevocably linked by treaty and policy directives…