SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Inter-item Reliability
1
Inter-item Reliability
With inter-item reliability or consistency we are
trying to determine the degree to which
responses to the items follow consistent
patterns.
2
For example
Let’s imagine that two items are designed to assess
how “teachable” someone is. Item 1 is a difficult item
for someone to agree with. So on a scale of 1 – 5 with
1 being “Strongly Disagree” and 5 being “Strongly
Agree” here is what the response pattern might look
like:
3
For example
4
Respondent Item 1
Bob 1
Carla 2
Don 1
Elsa 3
Fiona 1
Gordon 2
Etc.
For example
Now take a look at item 2. It is much easier to
agree with:
5
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Fiona 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
For example
6
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Fiona 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
Notice the
consistency
in the item
response
patterns
For example
7
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Fiona 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
Bob & Fiona
are less likely
to agree with
these items
targeting
teachableness.
For example
8
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Fiona 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
But even
though they
are both less
likely to agree
they
consistently
agree more
with item 2
than 1.
For example
9
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Fiona 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
This shows a
consistent
pattern across
items.
For example
10
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Bob 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
Notice that this
pattern holds
across all of
the other
respondents.
Item 2 is easier
to agree with
than Item 1
For example
11
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Bob 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
Notice also
that Elsa is the
most agreeable
across both
items.
For example
12
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Bob 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
And Bob &
Fiona are
consistently
the least
agreeable
across both
items.
For example
13
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Bob 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
The item responses to this instrument,
therefore, demonstrate high inter-item
reliability or consistency across persons
with different levels of the trait.
For example
14
Respondent Item 1 Item 2
Bob 1 4
Carla 2 5
Don 1 4
Elsa 3 6
Bob 1 4
Gordon 2 5
Etc.
This type of reliability is measured
principally by a statistic called
Cronbach's Alpha and ranges
traditionally from 0.00 (no consistency)
to +1.00 (completely consistent).

More Related Content

What's hot

Presentation Validity & Reliability
Presentation Validity & ReliabilityPresentation Validity & Reliability
Presentation Validity & Reliability
songoten77
 
Reliability
ReliabilityReliability
Reliability
Roi Xcel
 
Nonexperimental research design
Nonexperimental research designNonexperimental research design
Nonexperimental research design
Nursing Path
 
Single subjects-research
Single subjects-researchSingle subjects-research
Single subjects-research
Noor Hasmida
 
Carl roger’s person centered therapy
Carl roger’s person centered therapyCarl roger’s person centered therapy
Carl roger’s person centered therapy
dayonthomas
 
Theory of Planned Behavior
Theory of Planned BehaviorTheory of Planned Behavior
Theory of Planned Behavior
wpatch2
 
Chapter 2 explaining abnormality
Chapter 2  explaining abnormalityChapter 2  explaining abnormality
Chapter 2 explaining abnormality
Katiess1128
 

What's hot (20)

Presentation Validity & Reliability
Presentation Validity & ReliabilityPresentation Validity & Reliability
Presentation Validity & Reliability
 
Fundamentals of Physiological Psychology by Author Carlson, Neil R.
Fundamentals of Physiological Psychology by Author Carlson, Neil R.Fundamentals of Physiological Psychology by Author Carlson, Neil R.
Fundamentals of Physiological Psychology by Author Carlson, Neil R.
 
Reliability
ReliabilityReliability
Reliability
 
Julian Rotter
Julian RotterJulian Rotter
Julian Rotter
 
Theories of motivation
Theories of motivationTheories of motivation
Theories of motivation
 
Nonexperimental research design
Nonexperimental research designNonexperimental research design
Nonexperimental research design
 
Sach sentence completion
Sach sentence completionSach sentence completion
Sach sentence completion
 
Classical Test Theory (CTT)- By Dr. Jai Singh
Classical Test Theory (CTT)- By Dr. Jai SinghClassical Test Theory (CTT)- By Dr. Jai Singh
Classical Test Theory (CTT)- By Dr. Jai Singh
 
Randomize group design
Randomize group designRandomize group design
Randomize group design
 
Trait factor theory
Trait  factor theoryTrait  factor theory
Trait factor theory
 
Reliability and validity
Reliability and validityReliability and validity
Reliability and validity
 
Single subjects-research
Single subjects-researchSingle subjects-research
Single subjects-research
 
Chapter 4: Of Tests and Testing
Chapter 4: Of Tests and TestingChapter 4: Of Tests and Testing
Chapter 4: Of Tests and Testing
 
Rogers theory of Personality
Rogers theory of Personality Rogers theory of Personality
Rogers theory of Personality
 
Reliability and validity ppt
Reliability and validity pptReliability and validity ppt
Reliability and validity ppt
 
Carl roger’s person centered therapy
Carl roger’s person centered therapyCarl roger’s person centered therapy
Carl roger’s person centered therapy
 
Reliability
ReliabilityReliability
Reliability
 
Sullivan's interpersonal theory
Sullivan's interpersonal theory Sullivan's interpersonal theory
Sullivan's interpersonal theory
 
Theory of Planned Behavior
Theory of Planned BehaviorTheory of Planned Behavior
Theory of Planned Behavior
 
Chapter 2 explaining abnormality
Chapter 2  explaining abnormalityChapter 2  explaining abnormality
Chapter 2 explaining abnormality
 

More from Ken Plummer

More from Ken Plummer (20)

Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
 
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updatedLearn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
 
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright UpdatedInferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
 
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright UpdatedDiff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
 
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
 
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
 
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updatedNature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
 
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
 
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updatedMode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
 
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
 
Dichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaledDichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaled
 
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
 
Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30
 
Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)
 
Ordinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominalOrdinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominal
 
Relationship covariates
Relationship   covariatesRelationship   covariates
Relationship covariates
 
Relationship nature of data
Relationship nature of dataRelationship nature of data
Relationship nature of data
 
Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)
 
Levels of the iv
Levels of the ivLevels of the iv
Levels of the iv
 
Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)
 

Recently uploaded

Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student briefSpatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptxSKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptxDyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 

Inter item reliability with surveys

  • 2. Inter-item Reliability With inter-item reliability or consistency we are trying to determine the degree to which responses to the items follow consistent patterns. 2
  • 3. For example Let’s imagine that two items are designed to assess how “teachable” someone is. Item 1 is a difficult item for someone to agree with. So on a scale of 1 – 5 with 1 being “Strongly Disagree” and 5 being “Strongly Agree” here is what the response pattern might look like: 3
  • 4. For example 4 Respondent Item 1 Bob 1 Carla 2 Don 1 Elsa 3 Fiona 1 Gordon 2 Etc.
  • 5. For example Now take a look at item 2. It is much easier to agree with: 5 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Fiona 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc.
  • 6. For example 6 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Fiona 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc. Notice the consistency in the item response patterns
  • 7. For example 7 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Fiona 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc. Bob & Fiona are less likely to agree with these items targeting teachableness.
  • 8. For example 8 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Fiona 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc. But even though they are both less likely to agree they consistently agree more with item 2 than 1.
  • 9. For example 9 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Fiona 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc. This shows a consistent pattern across items.
  • 10. For example 10 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Bob 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc. Notice that this pattern holds across all of the other respondents. Item 2 is easier to agree with than Item 1
  • 11. For example 11 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Bob 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc. Notice also that Elsa is the most agreeable across both items.
  • 12. For example 12 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Bob 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc. And Bob & Fiona are consistently the least agreeable across both items.
  • 13. For example 13 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Bob 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc. The item responses to this instrument, therefore, demonstrate high inter-item reliability or consistency across persons with different levels of the trait.
  • 14. For example 14 Respondent Item 1 Item 2 Bob 1 4 Carla 2 5 Don 1 4 Elsa 3 6 Bob 1 4 Gordon 2 5 Etc. This type of reliability is measured principally by a statistic called Cronbach's Alpha and ranges traditionally from 0.00 (no consistency) to +1.00 (completely consistent).

Editor's Notes

  1. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  2. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  3. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  4. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  5. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  6. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  7. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  8. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  9. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  10. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  11. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  12. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  13. (less consensus among students on this factor)
  14. (less consensus among students on this factor)