SONA Q3

1. SONA Q3 :July- September
“Health + Performances = Success"

2. PARAMETERs:
 PERFORMANCEs: - Exchange
- Exchange + Leadership
- Leadership Role
- Members
- n° of member for each X realized
 HEALTH : - costumers relation
- Exchange
- Communication
- Talent Management
- Finance
- Organizational Structure

3. Modality of Evaluation:
1. Each Parameter has a score
2. I define the total score for performance and health
3. I calculate an average between performance and
health
4. The average is the indicator for the status of each
LC

4. LC’s SITUATION for Q3

5. ANCONA
ANCONA
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organization
alStructure
Communicati
on
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

6. BARI
BARI
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communicatio
n
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

7. BOLZANO
BOLZANO
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communication
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

8. CATANIA:
CATANIA
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communication
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

9. GENOVA
GENOVA
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communication
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

10. MILANO CATTOLICA
MILANO CATTOLICA
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communication
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

11. NAPOLI FEDERICO II
NAPOLI FEDERICO II
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communication
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

12. NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communication
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

13. PALERMO
PALERMO
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communication
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

14. PAVIA
PAVIA
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communicatio
n
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

15. PISA
PISA
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communicatio
n
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

16. ROMA SAPIENZA
ROMASAPIENZA
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communicatio
n
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

17. ROMA TRE
ROMA TRE
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communicatio
n
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

18. TORINO
TORINO
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communicatio
n
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

19. TRENTO
TRENTO
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communicatio
n
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

20. TRIESTE
TRIESTE
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communicatio
n
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

21. VENEZIA
VENEZIA
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communicatio
n
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1

22. RANKING Q3
LCs (30 Sept 2010)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ancona
BariBolzanoCataniaGenova
M
ilano
Cattolica
NapoliFederico
2
NapoliParthenopePalerm
o
Pavia
Pisa
Rom
a
SapienzaRom
a
Tre
Torino
Trento
TriesteVenezia
Serie1

23. Instructions for graphic
 With the graphic you can identify the area that you
have to improve
 In the next slide you can see the best LCs for each
subsystem
 You have contact them in order to understand what
they did and cover your gaps
Try to be RESPONSIBLE

24. Best LC for each subsystem
 Costumer Relation: Torino, Palermo
 Exchange: Napoli Federico II, Torino, Trieste
 Organizational Structure:Torino
 Communication: Milano Cattolica, Pavia
 Finance:Venezia
 Talent Management:Torino

25. CLUSTERs Q3

26. 1th Cluster
8 X 3 X+L 3 LR
15 M 18-24 H
AVERAGE
8,9 – 12,6
No one LC is
in this cluster
for the 1th
quarter

27. 2th Cluster
3 X 2 X+L 1 LR
5 M 12-17 H
AVERAGE
5,7 – 8,8
LC:
-Milano Cattolica
-Napoli Federico II
-Torino

28. 3th Cluster
1 X 1 X+L 0 LR
0 M 6-11 H
AVERAGE
0 – 5,6
LCs
Ancona
Bari
Bolzano
Catania
Genova
Napoli Pathenope
Palermo
Pavia
Pisa
Roma Sapienza
Roma Tre
Trento
Trieste
Venezia

29. Italian Do it Better…
For each question you can contact Silvia,
MCVP LCD & Project
Silvia.prastani@aiesec.net
Good Work…