Presentation by Denisa Fikarova, European Commission, DG Justice in conference "Supporting Victims of Crime in Latvia – Possibilities and Challenges" organised by Centre for Public Policy PROVIDUS on February 21-22, 2013 in Riga. Conference was organized in project "Conference is organized within framework of project Response to Crime Latvia and Beyond”. Further information about project: http://www.providus.lv/public/26862.html Further information about conference: http://www.providus.lv/upload_file/Projekti/Kriminalitesibas/Victim%20support/Conference_web.pdf -------- Prezentācija "Cietušo vajadzību apzināšanās, kāpēc tā ir svarīga? Eiropas Savienības vīzija par pamatnostādnēm attiecībā uz noziedzīgos nodarījumos cietušajiem" (Denisa Fikarova, Eiropas Komisijas Tieslietu ģenerāldirektorāts) konferencē "Atbalsta sistēma noziedzīgos nodarījumos cietušajiem – Latvijas iespējas un izaicinājumi". Konference tika organizēta 2013.gada 21.-22.februārī Rīgā projekta "Atbalsta sistēma noziegumos cietušajiem - Latvijā un citur" ietvaros. Plašāka informācija par projektu: http://www.providus.lv/public/27560.html Plašāka informācija par konferenci: http://www.providus.lv/public/27812.html

1. VICTIMS’ RIGHTS
Embracing the Victims' Needs, why it matters.
EU vision for substantial standards in regard to
victims of crime
21 February 2013 Supporting Victims of Crime in Latvia
–
Incorporating EU dimension

2. EU Policy on Victims’ Rights
Presentation Overview
•What’s already in place?
•Ongoing actions – New Victims Directive
•Future plans
•Challenges
2

3. EU Actions on Victims’ Rights
EU legislation
•2001 Framework Decision on the Standing of Victims in
Criminal Proceedings
•2004 Directive on Compensation to crime victims
•2011 Directive on Trafficking
•2011 Directive on Child Sexual Exploitation
•2011 Directive on the European Protection Order
Commission’s funding programmes
•Criminal Justice programme
•Daphne III programme (violence)
3

4.  The Victims Package (May 2011)
• Commisson’s Communication ”Strengthening the Rights of
Victims in the European Union”
• Proposal for Directive establishing minimum standards on
the rights, support and protection of victims
• Proposal for Regulation on mutual recognition of protection
measures in civil matters
 Council ”Budapest Roadmap” (June 2011)
4

5. Victims Directive 2012/29/EU
• Replacing Council Framework Decision
2001/220/JHA on the standing of victims in
criminal proceedings
• Commission Proposal: 18 May 2011
• Adoption: 25 October 2012
• Entry into force: 15 November 2012
• Transposition deadline: 16 November 2015
• Commission Report deadline: 16 November 2017
5

6. Victims Directive – Approach
• Victims are individuals and should be treated as
such!
• Meet the needs of victims:
 Respect and recognition
 Protection
 Support
 Access to justice
 Compensation and restoration
6

7. • Scope:
 Natural persons (not legal persons)
 Crimes committed in the EU and criminal proceedings
taking place in the EU (for extra-territorial offences)
 Irrespective of victims' residence status
 Both victims and their family members
• Ensure minimum rights for all victims, all crimes
• Recognise special needs of vulnerable victims
• Ensure clear, concrete, enforceable obligations
(Commission has full competence under Lisbon!)
• Directive is just one step – practical measures
and further action required
7

8. Victims Directive - Content
• 32 Articles (Art. 1-26 operational)
• Comprehensive scope of victims’ rights
throughout criminal proceedings:
 Information
 Interpretation and translation
 Support
 Protection
 Participation in criminal proceedings
 Training of practitioners
 Coordination
8

9. Victims Directive - Content
• Art. 1 – Objectives
 Victims to receive appropriate information, support and
protection and be able to participate in criminal
proceedings.
 Victims to be recognised and treated in a respectful,
sensitive, tailored, professional and non-discriminatory
manner.
 Child sensitive approach.
9

10. Victims Directive - Content
• Art. 2 – Definitions (selection)
 “Victim” is a natural person who has suffered harm directly
caused by a criminal offence, and family members of
deceased victim, who have suffered harm as a result
 “Family members” include also non-married partners
 Right to limit the number of and prioritise among family
members
10

11. Victims Directive - Content
• PROCEDURAL RIGHTS
 Right to information
 Right to interpretation and translation
 Right to participate in criminal
proceedings
-- However, some of these rights benefit victims depending on
the "role of the victim in the relevant criminal justice
system" (e.g. an injured party, a witness, a civil party, a
private prosecutor). Normally only victims who actively
participate. 11

12. Victims Directive - Content
• Art. 3-7 - Right to information
 Right to understand and be understood
 Right to get written (translated) acknowledgement of
complaint
 Right to receive a range of information from first contact
with competent authorities
 Right to receive information about victim’s case throughout
criminal proceedings
 Right to interpretation and translation
12

13. Victims Directive - Content
• Art. 10-17 - Participation in criminal
proceedings
 Right to be heard, reimbursement, legal aid, recovery of
property, compensation
 Rights of victims residents in another MS
 Safeguards for restorative justice processes
 Right to review a decision not to prosecute
13

14. Victims Directive - Content
• VICTIM SUPPORT AND PROTECTION
 Right to access general and specialist
support services
 Right to protection during criminal
proceedings
Important:
• Individual needs-based approach
• Support and protection of family members
• Consider specific needs (vulnerability) 14

15. Victims Directive - Content
• Art. 8-9 - Victim support
 Right to access victim support services (general and
specialised support) in accordance with victims’ and family
members’ needs. Confidential and free of charge services.
 VSO may be public or NGO, professional or voluntary.
Specialist support provided by separate entity or by general
VSO (or VSO "may call on existing specialised entities").
 MS must facilitate referrals to VSOs.
 Support not dependent on formal complaint.
 Minimum services, incl. procedural and practical
information & advice and emotional support. Specialist
support to provide shelters and targeted & integrated
support for victims with specific needs.
15

16. Victims Directive - Content
• Art. 18-24 - Protection and recognition of
victims with specific protection needs
 Range of protection measures, including avoiding contact
with offender, safeguards when interviewing victim,
protection of privacy
 Individual assessment to determine specific protection
needs due to vulnerability to secondary and repeat
victimisation, intimidation or retaliation.
 Criteria: personal characteristics, type or nature of the
crime and circumstances of the crime.
 Children always presumed to be vulnerable.
 Particular attention given some categories of victims
 Range of special measures to protect such victims during
criminal proceedings. 16

17. Victims Directive - Content
• Art. 25 - Training
 Training compulsory for police and court staff
 Training to be available for judges, prosecutors and lawyers
 Training to be encouraged for victim support and
restorative justice services
• Art. 26 - Cooperation
 MS should cooperate with each other
 Awareness raising actions, information, education
17

18. Commission's role in implementing
the Directive
• Article 288 TFEU: “A directive shall be binding, as to
the result to be achieved, upon each Member State to
which it is addressed, but shall leave to the national
authorities the choice of form and methods.”
• The Commission has to make sure that the result is
achieved – that MS transpose the directive into national
law by the deadline 16 November 2015.
• If no or insufficient transposition, the Commission may
initiate infringement action against a MS at the European
Court of Justice.
18

19. How will MS implement the Directive?
• Different levels of victims’ procedural rights in the MS
• Different legal traditions and criminal justice systems
• Different approaches taken on victims (hard/soft law)
 Some victims’ rights are more developed than others and
MS don't have the same approach on specific rights.
 Directive's minimum standards may already be achieved in
some MS while others have a long way to go...
 Some MS are already in the process of reforming their
systems and will be in compliance with the Directive
quicker than others (who may need more time and
assistance).
19

20. Implementation Strategy
Aim: Assist MS to optimise implementation to avoid
bad transposition
Actions:
 Commission guidelines on interpretation of each
Article and appropriate measures for compliance
(considering both hard and soft law measures).
Informal consultation with experts for input.
 Expert meeting with MS to kick off implementation.
 Implementation workshops on issues and progress.
 Consultation and cooperation with MS and
stakeholders.
 Project funding through grants or contracts (e.g.
exchange of best practices, training, information 20
provision, awareness raising, studies).

21. Challenges Ahead…
• Keep the momentum on victims! High
expectations to make a real change for victims.
• Effective implementation. Close collaboration
with Member States and involving stakeholders
(geographical approach, similarities in MS's legal
systems and traditions etc.).
• Address gaps for future action. Our efforts
don't end here – upcoming actions in the pipeline
(e.g. compensation).
21

22. Contact / Info:
European Commission
DG Justice, Procedural Criminal Law unit
Ingrid Bellander Todino
Denisa Fikarova
Victims Team
Tel.: +32-2 29 - 87539 / - 58895
E-mail: ingrid.bellander-todino@ec.europa.eu / denisa.fikarova@ec.europa.eu
Website:
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/criminal/victims/index_en.htm
22