2. What are your thoughts about the short listed sites?
1) You did not advertise this meeting
2) The cost to drain the Bridgeford property would eat up your 30% override‐
3) The 6th
site has been short notice‐ how could you have done the same due diligent as the other
sites in that time?
What are your thoughts about the added sixth site (the Crescent Harbor North site)?
What considerations are important to you in choosing a new treatment facility site?
If windjammer is the lowest cost and can be made the safest + cleanest + incorporated to the park
pleasing environment‐ at the lowest cost why is not it the best‐ most cost efficient way to go?
Please note: Commenters' personal information has been removed from the original comment forms, attached.
3. Please note: Commenters' personal information has been removed from the original comment forms, attached.
4. Please note: Commenters' personal information has been removed from the original comment forms, attached.