ENHANCING THE QUALITY OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS
1. T HE C ITIES D EVELOPMENT
I NITIATIVE F OR A SIA
ENHANCING THE QUALITY OF
URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE
INVESTMENTS
2. An Urban Asia by 2025
Urban population of Asia will
double between 2010 and
2050
Rural population will stop
growing by 2025
By 2050, 65% of Asia’s
population will be urban
Asia’s urban areas are driving
economic growth
But many of its cities are not
up to the task
Massive investment is
needed to ensure more
liveable cities
Source: World Urbanization Prospects, the 2009 Revision
3. Asia’s Urban Challenge
Over the next 20 years cities in Asia must be ready to provide
infrastructure and services to an expected 1 billion additional
people if economic growth and competitiveness are to progress.
• Asia’s economic growth is:
− Predominantly urban based
− Severely constrained by infrastructure deficiencies
• Improve/expedite urban infrastructure and service delivery is a
pre-condition for cities’ ability to realize economic growth and
compete
• The estimated urban environmental infrastructure investment need
in the Asia-Pacific region is about $100 billion per year
• Current urban environmental infrastructure investment is about $
40 billion per year
4. More Competitive Cities
Ability of a city to Competitive cities need:
o Good quality infrastructure,
increase household
incomes and productivity logistics, communications and
public services
is a combination of: o Innovation and entrepreneurship
o Capacity for wealth o Natural resources
creation o Location relative to markets
o Business friendly o Social capital
environment o Good quality of life
o Strength of research and
development They are business friendly and
able to raise finance to make it
all happen
5. More inclusive cities
City regions serve as
magnets for people, enter-
prise and culture, but with
urbanization, poverty
also urbanizes
The Asia-Pacific region
remains host to over half of
the worlds slum population:
in 2010 this amounted to
an estimated 505.5
million people
Source: Ravallion 2007
The urban poor must be
integrated in inclusive
urban development
6. Greener Cities
Cities generate waste that
contributes to land, air and water
pollution
Climate change poses a massive
threat to cities – adaptation and
mitigation strategies must both
be worked on at local level
Major improvements are
possible in the areas of energy
utilisation, urban transport and
land use, and in solid waste
disposal
Source: World Urbanization Prospects, the 2009 Revision
7. CDIA Rationale
Bridging the urban infrastructure investment
planning and programming gap
Cities often have macro-development strategies and spatial
plans, but city infrastructure projects to implement them are
often not adequately defined and prepared for financing
Particular issue for the 1,400+ medium-sized cities in Asia’s
developing countries with populations of 250,000 to 5,000,000
Difficult to use IFIs standard feasibility study instruments
(PPTAs) for these purposes – need for an additional instrument
8. CDIA helping find solutions
Mandate: The CDIA is assisting medium sized Asian cities to
bridge the gap between their development plans and financing of
their infrastructure investments, with emphasis on:
- Urban environmental improvement
- Urban poverty reduction
- Climate change mitigation or adaptation
- Improved governance
The CDIA partnership established in 2007 jointly managed by
ADB and GIZ and financially supported by ADB, BMZ, Sida, Gov.
of Austria and the Shanghai Municipal Government.
CDIA has a core budget of $ 37.9 million (2007-2012) and non-
core resources (including those held by KfW, ex-InWEnt,
Singapore and SMG) of $ 20.1 million.
10. CDIA Focus Areas
Infrastructure Investment Project Cycle
DIRECT SUPPORT
UP-STREAM DOWN-STREAM
City Development Infrastructure Pre-Feasibility Feasibility
Plan/Strategy Investment Studies/Project Study
Programming structuring
CDIA Focus Areas Financing
Arrangements
Project
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
Implementation
Operation &
Maintenance
11. Implementation Status (February 2012)
Current CDIA support to cities:
Approved support applications for 40 cities in 13 countries
including 63 Pre-Feasibility Studies (PFS)
33 PFS, 2 urban infrastructure investment programs and three
city-level capacity-building assignments completed in 21 cities
On-going activities in another 19 cities
Estimated infrastructure investment value of projects under
preparation about $ 5 billion - CDIA inputs represents approx.
0.25% of this
Potential sources of investment financing identified in all
approved cases, firmed up for 12 PFS in 9 cities
12. CDIA Interventions by Sector
(PFS)
Solid waste management
Flood management
Efficient transport systems
13. Selected City Interventions
“promoting effective
public transport”
Guiyang, CHINA
CDIA: US$ 521,800
Rehabilitation of Water Bodies
Investment Value: US$ 101 million
River-based urban infrastructure development,
CBD Urban Public Transport (LRT)
rehabilitation and bus terminal
Investment Value: US$ 2.3 billion
Banda Aceh, INDONESIA
14. Selected City Interventions
“innovate public-private
partnership for CDB
revitalization”
Banda Aceh, INDONESIA
CDIA: US$ 327,500
River-based urban infrastructure
development and CBD revitalization
Investment Value: US$ 22.6 million
15. Selected City Interventions
“promote public-private
partnerships”
Metro Cebu, PHILIPPINES
CDIA: US$ 459,000
South Road Project Utilities,
Urban public transport
Investment Value: US$ 500 million
16. Selected City Interventions
“promote cultural heritage
in urban development”
Naga, PHILIPPINES
CDIA: US$ 321,000
Naga River Revitalization
Investment Value: US$ 50 million
17. Selected City Interventions
“integrated transport “
Cochin, INDIA
CDIA: US$ 370,000
Integrated Urban Transport
Investment Value: US$ 122 million
18. Selected City Interventions
“working with industry
towards a greener city”
Da Nang, VIETNAM
CDIA: US$ 330,000
Waste Water Management and
Sewerage
Investment Value: US$ 50 million
19. Capacity Development
Three-layered Capacity
Development Strategy
Strengthening capacity at city
level as part of direct
interventions
Indirect interventions through
National Partner
Organizations (NPO)
Sustain CDIA efforts with
Manila core team and nodal
offices (to be) established in
Shanghai, China; Delhi, India
and Singapore
20. Capacity Development
Modalities for Capacity Development
In framework of City Interventions:
Learning by doing, hand-holding;
Institutional analysis of CDIA areas of concern;
Flagging capacity constraints considered
crucial for down-stream impact;
Identification of possible approaches
to address these constraints.
Other modes of capacity development:
Training on Project Programming, PFS;
Peer-to-Peer Learning;
YAP Program
National and regional knowledge events;
Partner dialogues, sensitization of CDIA approach.
21. National Partner Organizations
Identification of 19 NPOs in 9 countries
Ongoing discussions to agree on common work programs
– China
– India
– Indonesia
– Nepal
– Pakistan
– Philippines
– Sri Lanka
– Thailand
– Vietnam
22. Capacity Development
CDIA process tools and guidelines
City infrastructure PPP in urban
Pre-Feasibility investment planning infrastructure
Study guidelines and programming development
toolkit guidelines
23. Discussion Points
How to bridge the annual US $ 60 million (60% of
requirements) infrastructure investment gap in Asia?
Better project formulation needed
Arrangements for private sector participation need to be
dramatically up-scaled
Capacities for local urban infrastructure investment
planning and programming and project preparation need
to be sustainably strengthened
Existing regional institutional arrangements not
equipped to deal with this – need for a catalyst institution
supported by all those with a vested interest
24. Cities Development Initiative for Asia
Suites 202-203, Hanston Building
Emerald Avenue, Ortigas Center, Pasig City 1600
Metro Manila, Philippines
www.cdia.asia