Preparing and Presenting a Judicial Review
•Télécharger en tant que PPTX, PDF•
1 j'aime•2,052 vues
An updated version of a presentation given to law students at Glasgow University on the matters that need to be thought about when preparing a presenting a judicial review case in the Court of Session.
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Similaire à Preparing and Presenting a Judicial Review
Similaire à Preparing and Presenting a Judicial Review (20)
Plus de Robert Sutherland
Plus de Robert Sutherland (12)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Preparing and Presenting a Judicial Review
- 1. Preparing and Presenting a Judicial Review Robert Sutherland, Advocate Terra Firma Chambers
- 2. Petitioner What are you wanting to review? • a decision? • an action? • a policy? • an omission?
- 3. Petitioner The appropriate procedure? right of appeal? restrictions on grounds for appealing? restrictions on who can appeal? necessary? other proceedings where same issue relevant?
- 4. Petitioner individual, group or representative? Who Is Petitioner standing? funding? Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd v Lord Advocate, 2012 SC (UKSC) 122 Walton v The Scottish Ministers, 2013 (UKSC) 67 McGinty v Scottish Ministers, [2013] CSIH 78
- 5. Petitioner Who is Respondent Interested Party • decision maker / policy maker? • UK Minister or Scottish Government? • who else has an interest in outcome? • “devolution issue” (Scotland Act 1998, Sched. 6)?
- 7. Petitioner • Rules of the Court of Session, Chapter 58A Protective Expenses Orders • R (Corner House Research) v The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, [2005] 1 WLR 2600 • Newton Mearns Residents Flood Prevention Group for Cheviot Drive v East Renfrewshire Council, [2013] CSIH 70
- 8. Petitioner Grounds? • illegality (inc. human rights breaches) • “Wednesbury” unreasonableness • procedural impropriety • legitimate expectation
- 9. The Petition Form Structure Style • RCS, Form 58.6 • parties • concise • productions? • subject matter • clear • other relevant documents • grounds for review • consistent • remedies • pleas-in-law • Schedules and notice period
- 10. The Petition Issues to be anticipated delay • Human Rights Act 1998, Section 7(5) • mora, taciturnity and acquiescence • Portobello Park Action Group v City of Edinburgh Council, 2012 SLT 1137 PN No. 1 of 2012 immigration and asylum - prior notification caveats interim orders balance of convenience transfer to Upper Tribunal?
- 12. First Orders caveat? interim orders? intimation and service first hearing date answers?
- 13. First Hearing Introductions Identify bare background and main issues Outline structure of submission The legal framework The factual background Where the Respondent has gone wrong Pleas-in-law and orders sought
- 15. Preparing and Presenting a Judicial Review Robert Sutherland, Advocate Terra Firma Chambers