SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  54
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN
PERSONAL INJURY CASES
   October 31, 2008 · CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS
TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.    Ethical Considerations
      a. Defining the Tripartite Relationship
      b. Applicable Rules of Professional Conduct
      c. Minimizing Litigation Costs
      d. HIPAA and Other Privacy Issues

II.   How to Take a Plaintiff’s Deposition
      a. Determining Your Goal
      b. Organizing the Deposition
      c. Sample Plaintiff Interview
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Defining The Tripartite Relationship

                                   The tripartite relationship is
                                   generally defined as the litigation
                                   triangle formed by the client, the
                                   client’s insurer and the attorney.
            client                 Make no mistake the client is the
                                   most important cog in the tripartite
                                   relationship. Both the insurer and
                                   attorney must take the utmost
                                   care to fulfill their obligations to
                                   the client.
                                   Part of the attorney’s role will be to
                                   oversee and protect the client’s
                                   interest with regard to the insurer.
Attorney              Insurer
Rules of Professional Conduct as They Apply to
  Personal Injury Practice and the Tripartite
                 Relationship
Rule 1.1 Competence


 A lawyer shall provide competent
 representation to a client. Competent
 representation requires the legal
 knowledge, skill, thoroughness and
 preparation reasonably necessary for
 the representation.
Rule 1.2 Scope of Representation


 (a) Subject to paragraphs (c) and (d), a lawyer shall abide by a client's decisions
 concerning the objectives of representation and, as required by Rule 1.4, shall consult with
 the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued. A lawyer may take such action
 on behalf of the client as is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation. A lawyer
 shall abide by a client's decision whether to settle a matter. In a criminal case, the lawyer
 shall abide by the client's decision, after consultation with the lawyer, as to a plea to be
 entered, whether to waive jury trial and whether the client will testify.

 (b) A lawyer's representation of a client, including representation by appointment, does not
 constitute an endorsement of the client's political, economic, social or moral views or
 activities.

 (c) A lawyer may limit the scope and objectives of the representation if the limitation is
 reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent.

 (d) A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the
 lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent, but a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of
 any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a
 good faith effort to determine the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law.
Rule 1.2 Comment 6


 Agreements Limiting Scope of Representation
 [6] The scope of services to be provided by a lawyer may be limited by
 agreement with the client or by the terms under which the lawyer's
 services are made available to the client. When a lawyer has been
 retained by an insurer to represent an insured, for
 example, the representation may be limited to matters related
 to the insurance coverage. A limited representation may be
 appropriate because the client has limited objectives for the
 representation. In addition, the terms upon which representation is
 undertaken may exclude specific means that might otherwise be used
 to accomplish the client's objectives. Such limitations may exclude
 actions that the client thinks are too costly or that the lawyer regards
 as repugnant, unethical, or imprudent.
Rule 1.4 Communication


(a) A lawyer shall:

     (1) promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client's informed
     consent, as defined in Rule 1.0(e), is required by these Rules;

     (2) reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be
     accomplished;

     (3) keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter;

     (4) promptly comply with reasonable requests for information; and

     (5) consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer's conduct when the lawyer knows
     that the client expects assistance not permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law or
     assistance limited under Rule 1.2(c).

(b) A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed
     decisions regarding the representation.
Rule 1.4 Comment 1


[1] Reasonable communication between
    the lawyer and the client is
    necessary for the client effectively to
    participate in the representation.
Rule 1.4 Comment 2


[2] If these Rules require that a particular decision about the
   representation be made by the client, paragraph (a)(1) requires
   that the lawyer promptly consult with and secure the client's
   consent prior to taking action unless prior discussions with the
   client have resolved what action the client wants the lawyer to
   take. For example, a lawyer who receives from opposing
   counsel an offer of settlement in a civil controversy or a
   proffered plea bargain in a criminal case must promptly
   inform the client of its substance unless the client has
   previously indicated that the proposal will be acceptable or
   unacceptable or has authorized the lawyer to accept or to reject
   the offer. See Rule 1.2(a).
Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest


(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a
     concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:

     (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or

     (2) there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the
     lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the
     lawyer.

(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may
     represent a client if:

     (1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent
     representation to each affected client;

     (2) the representation is not prohibited by law;

     (3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client
     represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and

     (4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
Rule 3.1    Meritorious Claims


 A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or
 assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is
 a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not
 frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for
 an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.
 A lawyer for the defendant in a criminal
 proceeding, or the respondent in a proceeding that
 could result in incarceration, may nevertheless so
 defend the proceeding as to require that every
 element of the case be established.
Reconciliation


• How do we reconcile the Rules of
  Professional Conduct with the Tripartite
  Relationship?
• Can we represent both and still be in
  compliance with the Rules of
  Professional Conduct?
• What if there is a conflict between the
  client and his/her insurer?
Case Law


 The Indiana Supreme Court in
 Cincinnati Insurance Company v.
 Wills, 717 N.E.2d 515 (1999), held:
 “There are plainly many situations where representation of both
 an insured and the insurer is inconsistent with the Rules of
 Professional Conduct. However, the issue in this case is whether
 these potential conflicts are so inherent in the representation
 that it is a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct to
 enter into the arrangement in the first place. We think not.”
Case Law


 “Whether the attorney is an employee or an outside lawyer, the debate
 focuses on whether only the insured or both the insured and the
 insurer should be viewed as the client. We think it unrealistic to ignore
 the client relationship with both. Joint representation may become
 problematic, particularly if issues of disclosure of confidences arise. For
 example the attorney may gain information from the policyholder-client
 that may affect the insurer-client's coverage obligation. But that is no
 basis for prohibiting the arrangement in all cases. Whatever issues joint
 representation raises appear to be wholly independent of the attorney's
 status as an employee of the insurer or a member of a law firm.
 Second, there is nothing inherently wrong in common representation of
 two parties where their interests are aligned.” Cincinnati at 161.
Case Law


 “If a conflict arises, it will have to be handled, and there are a variety
 of means to do that. But a vast number of claims have been and
 presumably will be handled with no significant issue between the
 insurer and the policyholder. Interests of economy and simplicity
 dictate that this be permitted to continue. Any abuses can be handled
 on a case-by-case basis rather than by adoption of the broad
 prohibition the Wills seek. Although issues may arise in dual
 representation, none are apparent in this case. In any event, Celina
 has by contract subordinated its interests as a client to those of Suter.
 Presumably, this resolves by agreement the priority of counsel's
 obligations if, for example, counsel learns of information that affects
 the insurer's and the policyholder's interests differently.” Cincinnati at
 161.
Potential Problems


• Non-cooperation of the client—do you tell the carrier the client
  has been unresponsive?
• Possibility of excess exposure—make sure the client knows
  (s)he may be subject to an excess exposure and has the right to
  hire independent counsel.
• Reporting to the client—see Rule of Professional Conduct
  1.4, comment 2.
• Who decides how much to spend in defense of the case? What
  if you think you need an expert but the insurer doesn’t want to
  incur the costs?
Minimizing Litigation Costs
Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down



•   Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs
    to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart
    on your evaluations
Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down



•   Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs
    to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart
    on your evaluations
•   Early mediation
Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down



•   Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs
    to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart
    on your evaluations
•   Early mediation
•   Refrain from issuing non-party discovery
Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down



•   Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs
    to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart
    on your evaluations
•   Early mediation
•   Refrain from issuing non-party discovery
•   Don’t order deposition transcripts (beware of angry court reporters)
Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down



•   Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs
    to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart
    on your evaluations
•   Early mediation
•   Refrain from issuing non-party discovery
•   Don’t order deposition transcripts
•   Suggest a medical records review by a nurse or chiropractor (as
    opposed to a medical doctor) when possible
Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down



•   Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs
    to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart
    on your evaluations
•   Early mediation
•   Refrain from issuing non-party discovery
•   Don’t order deposition transcripts
•   Suggest a medical records review by a nurse or chiropractor (as
    opposed to a medical doctor) when possible
•   Prepare your litigation budget carefully and be sure to include some
    latitude for unexpected expenses
HIPPA and Other Privacy Issues
Current HIPAA Rule


SEC. 1177 (a) OFFENSE—Person knowingly in violation of this part--
(1) uses or causes to be used a unique health identifier;
(2) obtains individually identifiable health information relating to an individual; or
(3) discloses individually identifiable health information to another person,
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(b) PENALTIES.--A person described in subsection (a) shall--
(1) be fined not more than $50,000, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both;
(2) if the offense is committed under false pretenses, be fined not more than
$100,000, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both; and
(3) if the offense is committed with intent to sell, transfer, or use individually
identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain, or
malicious harm, be fined not more than $250,000, imprisoned not more than 10
years, or both.
How to Avoid HIPAA Violations


•Do not include Social Security numbers in any documents.
•Use HIPAA compliant language in the non-party requests.
•Be careful to whom you disseminate medical records.
   •Even providing records to your client’s insurer can be
   considered a violation of HIPAA.
Taking a Plaintiff’s Deposition
Determining Your Goal
What are the Strengths?


• What are the strengths and weaknesses
  of your case?
What are the Strengths?


• What are the strengths and weaknesses
  of your case?
• Are you strong on liability?
What are the Strengths?


• What are the strengths and weaknesses
  of your case?
• Are you strong on liability?
• Are you strong on damages?
What are the Strengths?


• What are the Strengths and
  Weaknesses of your case?
• Are you strong on liability?
• Are you strong on damages?
• Are you strong on both?
What are the Strengths?


 Use this as a guide to determine your
 goal during the deposition.
What are the Strengths?


 Use this is a guide to determine your
 goal during the deposition.

 If you are strong on liability spend the
 majority of your time asking questions
 about how or why an accident occurred.
What are the Strengths?


 If you are strong on damages spend the
 majority of your time discussing prior
 injuries and/or causation.

 Don’t spend a lot of time talking about
 liability if your client was drunk and
 crossed over the centerline (allegedly).
Organizing the Deposition
Start at the End


 A great way to frame your questions for
 deposition is to prepare jury instructions
 first.

 If you know what you will be required
 to show at trial to receive a certain
 instruction, you can frame your
 questions accordingly.
Start at the End


   You might also want to develop your theme of the case prior to
   deposition. Think about what you want to be able to argue in
   closing arguments and tailor your questions to get the
   responses that will be most effective. Chances are you have a
   pretty good road map from discovery responses.

  If your theme is going to be that plaintiff’s inattention led to an
  accident, focus on getting him/her to tell you all the other
  things that were going on immediately before or during the
  accident.
•      Was the radio on, were you eating or drinking, do you
       smoke, were you having a conversation with a passenger?
Don’t Be Predictable!


• I like to vary the sequence of questions based on the facts and
  the witness.
• If you are reading from an outline, chances are opposing
  counsel has the same or a similar outline. How are you going to
  surprise someone that way?
• Don’t read the outline while the answer is being given. All too
  often I see young and/or inexperienced attorneys looking for
  their next question and not listening to the answers.
• It keeps the witness back on his/her heels and does not allow
  them to be thinking a few questions ahead.
• If every question is a follow up to the question before it people
  will catch on.
Mediation or Trial?


• I will approach a deposition differently if I think the case has a
  chance to settle at mediation.
Mediation or Trial?


• I will approach a deposition differently if I think the case has a
  chance to settle at mediation.
    •   If I believe we can mediate successfully I won’t hold anything back at the
        plaintiff’s deposition. I’ll give my opponent all the ammunition I have to
        push the settlement value of the case down.
Mediation or Trial?


• I will approach a deposition differently if I think the case has a
  chance to settle at mediation.
    •   If I believe we can mediate successfully I won’t hold anything back at the
        plaintiff’s deposition. I’ll give my opponent all the ammunition I have to
        push down the settlement value of the case.
    •   Springing the smoking gun (provided you have a smoking gun) on them at
        mediation gives opposing counsel no time to explain to his client how this
        impacts settlement value.
Mediation or Trial?


• I will approach a deposition differently if I think the case has a
  chance to settle at mediation.
    •   If I believe we can mediate successfully I won’t hold anything back at the
        plaintiff’s deposition. I’ll give my opponent all the ammunition I have to
        push down the settlement value of the case.
    •   Springing the smoking gun (provided you have a smoking gun) on them at
        mediation gives opposing counsel no time to explain to his client how this
        impacts settlement value.
    •   Bringing this out in the deposition also gives you an idea how the plaintiff
        will react to surprising information should you be forced to try the case.
Mediation or Trial?


• If you know the case is going to trial, hold some of the really
  good stuff back.
Mediation or Trial?


• If you know the case is going to trial, hold some of the really
  good stuff back.
    •   If you know about a prior conviction that will be admissible, let them deny
        they have been convicted during the deposition, but don’t let them know
        you have evidence that will bury them at trial.
Mediation or Trial?


• If you know the case is going to trial, hold some of the really
  good stuff back.
    •   If you know about a prior conviction that will be admissible, let them deny
        they have been convicted during the deposition, but don’t let them know
        you have evidence that will bury them at trial.
    •   If they have denied any prior back or neck problems, and you have records
        that show a pre-existing condition, let it go at the deposition and save it for
        trial where it will have the most impact.
Mediation or Trial?


• If you know the case is going to trial, hold some of the really
  good stuff back.
    •   If you know about a prior conviction that will be admissible, let them deny
        they have been convicted during the deposition, but don’t let them know
        you have evidence that will bury them at trial.
    •   If they have denied any prior back or neck problems, and you have records
        that show a pre-existing condition, let it go at the deposition and save it for
        trial where it will have the most impact.
    •   This can be risky so make sure you have thought the process through
        completely—like making sure you can get the evidence in at trial. If it is
        inadmissible you waste any chance of it having an impact.
Often Overlooked Information


• Ask about clubs or churches to which he/she belongs.
• Ask about community involvement.
• Ask about their last vacation. This often times disputes claims
  of being unable to sit or stand for long periods of time.
• Make sure to get all the names of doctors and medical providers
  so that additional non-party requests can be sent after the
  deposition.
• Pin down dates of when injuries resolved.
• Ask about gaps in treatment.
• Ask how they found their treating physician. Often times you
  will see a plaintiff from the south side driving to a doctor or
  chiropractor an hour from home because of an attorney referral.
Prepare, Prepare, Prepare!


• The best tool you have just may be an aggressive paralegal. If
  the case warrants it send out all the non-parties you can to
  obtain all the medical and work history possible.
• If plaintiff’s counsel objects to the scope of your non-party
  requests (includes mental health or substance abuse
  records), chances are you are on the right track.
• Consult with co-defendant’s counsel to see what information
  they received.
• Pull motor vehicle records.
• Do a google search.
• Look on Facebook and My Space pages.
• Make sure you have a medical chronology.
Samples From Plaintiff’s Depositions
How Did You Find Your Doctor?


  9    Q Mr. [Plaintiff’s Attorney], is he the one who told you about
  10      Dr. Mandel?
  11    A Yes.
  12    Q What did he tell you about Dr. Mandel?
  13    A That's where we would be having our treatment done
  14      by.
  15    Q And that was okay with you?
  16    A Yes.
  17    Q You didn't have any other doctors in mind or
  18      anything like that?
  19   A No.
How Did You Find Your Doctor?


  9    Q Mr. [Plaintiff’s Attorney], is he the one who told you about
  10      Dr. Mandel?
  11    A Yes.
  12    Q What did he tell you about Dr. Mandel?
  13    A That's where we would be having our treatment done
  14      by.
  15    Q And that was okay with you?
  16    A Yes.
  17    Q You didn't have any other doctors in mind or
  18      anything like that?
  19   A No.

Contenu connexe

Tendances (18)

Contract of guarantee
Contract of guaranteeContract of guarantee
Contract of guarantee
 
Breach of trust
Breach of trust Breach of trust
Breach of trust
 
LBE-1.2.pptx
LBE-1.2.pptxLBE-1.2.pptx
LBE-1.2.pptx
 
Trust act 1882, an eleborative article
Trust act 1882, an eleborative articleTrust act 1882, an eleborative article
Trust act 1882, an eleborative article
 
Glossary of insurance_terms a-z
Glossary of insurance_terms a-zGlossary of insurance_terms a-z
Glossary of insurance_terms a-z
 
BUSINESS LAW
 BUSINESS LAW BUSINESS LAW
BUSINESS LAW
 
The indian trusts act, 1882
The indian trusts act, 1882The indian trusts act, 1882
The indian trusts act, 1882
 
Legal aspects of business master notes
Legal aspects of business master notesLegal aspects of business master notes
Legal aspects of business master notes
 
Indian Contract Act 1872.ppt
Indian Contract Act 1872.pptIndian Contract Act 1872.ppt
Indian Contract Act 1872.ppt
 
Legal Aspect of Business MBA Semester 2
Legal Aspect of Business MBA Semester 2Legal Aspect of Business MBA Semester 2
Legal Aspect of Business MBA Semester 2
 
Duty to Client
Duty to Client Duty to Client
Duty to Client
 
Business law unit 3
Business law unit 3Business law unit 3
Business law unit 3
 
Consideration
ConsiderationConsideration
Consideration
 
COMMERCIAL LAW
COMMERCIAL LAW COMMERCIAL LAW
COMMERCIAL LAW
 
Business Law
Business LawBusiness Law
Business Law
 
Indemnity & guarantee
Indemnity & guaranteeIndemnity & guarantee
Indemnity & guarantee
 
Business law unit 1
Business law unit 1Business law unit 1
Business law unit 1
 
Business law _Notes
Business law _NotesBusiness law _Notes
Business law _Notes
 

Similaire à Nbi Seminar Defense Strategies In Personal Injury Cases

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CASE SELECTION AND MANAGEMENT (DEFENSE)
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CASE SELECTION AND MANAGEMENT (DEFENSE) MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CASE SELECTION AND MANAGEMENT (DEFENSE)
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CASE SELECTION AND MANAGEMENT (DEFENSE) Robert Waterman
 
September webinar handout: "Thorny Ethics Issues"
September webinar handout: "Thorny Ethics Issues"September webinar handout: "Thorny Ethics Issues"
September webinar handout: "Thorny Ethics Issues"LexisNexis
 
Ethical Issues in the Tripartite Relationship
Ethical Issues in the Tripartite RelationshipEthical Issues in the Tripartite Relationship
Ethical Issues in the Tripartite RelationshipBrian Jones
 
Insider Lease Agreements (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankrup...
Insider Lease Agreements (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankrup...Insider Lease Agreements (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankrup...
Insider Lease Agreements (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankrup...Financial Poise
 
Single Asset Real Estate Cases (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based B...
Single Asset Real Estate Cases (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based B...Single Asset Real Estate Cases (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based B...
Single Asset Real Estate Cases (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based B...Financial Poise
 
2021 ACC Mountain West Best Practices Club
2021 ACC Mountain West Best Practices Club2021 ACC Mountain West Best Practices Club
2021 ACC Mountain West Best Practices ClubParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish (Ethics)
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish (Ethics)Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish (Ethics)
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish (Ethics)Woodrow Glass
 
Valuing Real Estate Assets (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankr...
Valuing Real Estate Assets (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankr...Valuing Real Estate Assets (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankr...
Valuing Real Estate Assets (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankr...Financial Poise
 
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...Financial Poise
 
Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013
Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013
Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013Gerald Brunker
 
Simple law assignment help
Simple law assignment helpSimple law assignment help
Simple law assignment helpcheapcouk
 
Trinity Kings World Leadership discovers how (former attorney) Milton Raiford...
Trinity Kings World Leadership discovers how (former attorney) Milton Raiford...Trinity Kings World Leadership discovers how (former attorney) Milton Raiford...
Trinity Kings World Leadership discovers how (former attorney) Milton Raiford...Terrell Patillo
 
RETS Presentation - Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management
RETS Presentation - Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk ManagementRETS Presentation - Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management
RETS Presentation - Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk ManagementGerald Brunker
 
Ethics of Negotiation: Managing Conflicting Obligations
Ethics of Negotiation: Managing Conflicting ObligationsEthics of Negotiation: Managing Conflicting Obligations
Ethics of Negotiation: Managing Conflicting ObligationsCassie McGarvey, JD
 
Bad Faith Nov2013 Policyholder View of Defense Counsel Ethical Duties
Bad Faith Nov2013 Policyholder View of Defense Counsel Ethical Duties Bad Faith Nov2013 Policyholder View of Defense Counsel Ethical Duties
Bad Faith Nov2013 Policyholder View of Defense Counsel Ethical Duties HB Litigation Conferences
 
405693104-workload-of-a-lawyer-pptx.pptx
405693104-workload-of-a-lawyer-pptx.pptx405693104-workload-of-a-lawyer-pptx.pptx
405693104-workload-of-a-lawyer-pptx.pptxDarwin11
 
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks Saylor.org 701 .docx
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks  Saylor.org  701 .docxSaylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks  Saylor.org  701 .docx
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks Saylor.org 701 .docxanhlodge
 
Bad Faith & Coverage Newsletter
Bad Faith & Coverage NewsletterBad Faith & Coverage Newsletter
Bad Faith & Coverage NewsletterdmurrayTH
 
Common ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediations
Common ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediationsCommon ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediations
Common ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediationsEdward K. Le
 
Bad Faith Insurance Coverage
Bad Faith Insurance CoverageBad Faith Insurance Coverage
Bad Faith Insurance Coveragerlhicksjr
 

Similaire à Nbi Seminar Defense Strategies In Personal Injury Cases (20)

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CASE SELECTION AND MANAGEMENT (DEFENSE)
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CASE SELECTION AND MANAGEMENT (DEFENSE) MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CASE SELECTION AND MANAGEMENT (DEFENSE)
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CASE SELECTION AND MANAGEMENT (DEFENSE)
 
September webinar handout: "Thorny Ethics Issues"
September webinar handout: "Thorny Ethics Issues"September webinar handout: "Thorny Ethics Issues"
September webinar handout: "Thorny Ethics Issues"
 
Ethical Issues in the Tripartite Relationship
Ethical Issues in the Tripartite RelationshipEthical Issues in the Tripartite Relationship
Ethical Issues in the Tripartite Relationship
 
Insider Lease Agreements (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankrup...
Insider Lease Agreements (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankrup...Insider Lease Agreements (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankrup...
Insider Lease Agreements (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankrup...
 
Single Asset Real Estate Cases (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based B...
Single Asset Real Estate Cases (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based B...Single Asset Real Estate Cases (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based B...
Single Asset Real Estate Cases (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based B...
 
2021 ACC Mountain West Best Practices Club
2021 ACC Mountain West Best Practices Club2021 ACC Mountain West Best Practices Club
2021 ACC Mountain West Best Practices Club
 
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish (Ethics)
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish (Ethics)Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish (Ethics)
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish (Ethics)
 
Valuing Real Estate Assets (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankr...
Valuing Real Estate Assets (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankr...Valuing Real Estate Assets (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankr...
Valuing Real Estate Assets (Series: Ethical Issues in Real Estate-Based Bankr...
 
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
 
Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013
Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013
Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013
 
Simple law assignment help
Simple law assignment helpSimple law assignment help
Simple law assignment help
 
Trinity Kings World Leadership discovers how (former attorney) Milton Raiford...
Trinity Kings World Leadership discovers how (former attorney) Milton Raiford...Trinity Kings World Leadership discovers how (former attorney) Milton Raiford...
Trinity Kings World Leadership discovers how (former attorney) Milton Raiford...
 
RETS Presentation - Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management
RETS Presentation - Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk ManagementRETS Presentation - Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management
RETS Presentation - Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management
 
Ethics of Negotiation: Managing Conflicting Obligations
Ethics of Negotiation: Managing Conflicting ObligationsEthics of Negotiation: Managing Conflicting Obligations
Ethics of Negotiation: Managing Conflicting Obligations
 
Bad Faith Nov2013 Policyholder View of Defense Counsel Ethical Duties
Bad Faith Nov2013 Policyholder View of Defense Counsel Ethical Duties Bad Faith Nov2013 Policyholder View of Defense Counsel Ethical Duties
Bad Faith Nov2013 Policyholder View of Defense Counsel Ethical Duties
 
405693104-workload-of-a-lawyer-pptx.pptx
405693104-workload-of-a-lawyer-pptx.pptx405693104-workload-of-a-lawyer-pptx.pptx
405693104-workload-of-a-lawyer-pptx.pptx
 
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks Saylor.org 701 .docx
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks  Saylor.org  701 .docxSaylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks  Saylor.org  701 .docx
Saylor URL httpwww.saylor.orgbooks Saylor.org 701 .docx
 
Bad Faith & Coverage Newsletter
Bad Faith & Coverage NewsletterBad Faith & Coverage Newsletter
Bad Faith & Coverage Newsletter
 
Common ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediations
Common ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediationsCommon ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediations
Common ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediations
 
Bad Faith Insurance Coverage
Bad Faith Insurance CoverageBad Faith Insurance Coverage
Bad Faith Insurance Coverage
 

Plus de rfoos

Damages In A Tbi Trial
Damages In A Tbi TrialDamages In A Tbi Trial
Damages In A Tbi Trialrfoos
 
Nbi Seminar Litigating To Win
Nbi Seminar Litigating To WinNbi Seminar Litigating To Win
Nbi Seminar Litigating To Winrfoos
 
Nbi Seminar Litigating To Win
Nbi Seminar Litigating To WinNbi Seminar Litigating To Win
Nbi Seminar Litigating To Winrfoos
 
Removal To Federal Court Rob Foos
Removal To Federal Court   Rob FoosRemoval To Federal Court   Rob Foos
Removal To Federal Court Rob Foosrfoos
 
Medical Evidence Seminar
Medical Evidence SeminarMedical Evidence Seminar
Medical Evidence Seminarrfoos
 
Truck Accident Litigation From Start To Finish (Nbi November 2011)
Truck Accident Litigation From Start To Finish (Nbi November 2011)Truck Accident Litigation From Start To Finish (Nbi November 2011)
Truck Accident Litigation From Start To Finish (Nbi November 2011)rfoos
 

Plus de rfoos (6)

Damages In A Tbi Trial
Damages In A Tbi TrialDamages In A Tbi Trial
Damages In A Tbi Trial
 
Nbi Seminar Litigating To Win
Nbi Seminar Litigating To WinNbi Seminar Litigating To Win
Nbi Seminar Litigating To Win
 
Nbi Seminar Litigating To Win
Nbi Seminar Litigating To WinNbi Seminar Litigating To Win
Nbi Seminar Litigating To Win
 
Removal To Federal Court Rob Foos
Removal To Federal Court   Rob FoosRemoval To Federal Court   Rob Foos
Removal To Federal Court Rob Foos
 
Medical Evidence Seminar
Medical Evidence SeminarMedical Evidence Seminar
Medical Evidence Seminar
 
Truck Accident Litigation From Start To Finish (Nbi November 2011)
Truck Accident Litigation From Start To Finish (Nbi November 2011)Truck Accident Litigation From Start To Finish (Nbi November 2011)
Truck Accident Litigation From Start To Finish (Nbi November 2011)
 

Nbi Seminar Defense Strategies In Personal Injury Cases

  • 1. DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES October 31, 2008 · CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS
  • 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Ethical Considerations a. Defining the Tripartite Relationship b. Applicable Rules of Professional Conduct c. Minimizing Litigation Costs d. HIPAA and Other Privacy Issues II. How to Take a Plaintiff’s Deposition a. Determining Your Goal b. Organizing the Deposition c. Sample Plaintiff Interview
  • 4. Defining The Tripartite Relationship The tripartite relationship is generally defined as the litigation triangle formed by the client, the client’s insurer and the attorney. client Make no mistake the client is the most important cog in the tripartite relationship. Both the insurer and attorney must take the utmost care to fulfill their obligations to the client. Part of the attorney’s role will be to oversee and protect the client’s interest with regard to the insurer. Attorney Insurer
  • 5. Rules of Professional Conduct as They Apply to Personal Injury Practice and the Tripartite Relationship
  • 6. Rule 1.1 Competence A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
  • 7. Rule 1.2 Scope of Representation (a) Subject to paragraphs (c) and (d), a lawyer shall abide by a client's decisions concerning the objectives of representation and, as required by Rule 1.4, shall consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued. A lawyer may take such action on behalf of the client as is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation. A lawyer shall abide by a client's decision whether to settle a matter. In a criminal case, the lawyer shall abide by the client's decision, after consultation with the lawyer, as to a plea to be entered, whether to waive jury trial and whether the client will testify. (b) A lawyer's representation of a client, including representation by appointment, does not constitute an endorsement of the client's political, economic, social or moral views or activities. (c) A lawyer may limit the scope and objectives of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent. (d) A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent, but a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law.
  • 8. Rule 1.2 Comment 6 Agreements Limiting Scope of Representation [6] The scope of services to be provided by a lawyer may be limited by agreement with the client or by the terms under which the lawyer's services are made available to the client. When a lawyer has been retained by an insurer to represent an insured, for example, the representation may be limited to matters related to the insurance coverage. A limited representation may be appropriate because the client has limited objectives for the representation. In addition, the terms upon which representation is undertaken may exclude specific means that might otherwise be used to accomplish the client's objectives. Such limitations may exclude actions that the client thinks are too costly or that the lawyer regards as repugnant, unethical, or imprudent.
  • 9. Rule 1.4 Communication (a) A lawyer shall: (1) promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client's informed consent, as defined in Rule 1.0(e), is required by these Rules; (2) reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be accomplished; (3) keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter; (4) promptly comply with reasonable requests for information; and (5) consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer's conduct when the lawyer knows that the client expects assistance not permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law or assistance limited under Rule 1.2(c). (b) A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.
  • 10. Rule 1.4 Comment 1 [1] Reasonable communication between the lawyer and the client is necessary for the client effectively to participate in the representation.
  • 11. Rule 1.4 Comment 2 [2] If these Rules require that a particular decision about the representation be made by the client, paragraph (a)(1) requires that the lawyer promptly consult with and secure the client's consent prior to taking action unless prior discussions with the client have resolved what action the client wants the lawyer to take. For example, a lawyer who receives from opposing counsel an offer of settlement in a civil controversy or a proffered plea bargain in a criminal case must promptly inform the client of its substance unless the client has previously indicated that the proposal will be acceptable or unacceptable or has authorized the lawyer to accept or to reject the offer. See Rule 1.2(a).
  • 12. Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or (2) there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. (b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if: (1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client; (2) the representation is not prohibited by law; (3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and (4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
  • 13. Rule 3.1 Meritorious Claims A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. A lawyer for the defendant in a criminal proceeding, or the respondent in a proceeding that could result in incarceration, may nevertheless so defend the proceeding as to require that every element of the case be established.
  • 14. Reconciliation • How do we reconcile the Rules of Professional Conduct with the Tripartite Relationship? • Can we represent both and still be in compliance with the Rules of Professional Conduct? • What if there is a conflict between the client and his/her insurer?
  • 15. Case Law The Indiana Supreme Court in Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Wills, 717 N.E.2d 515 (1999), held: “There are plainly many situations where representation of both an insured and the insurer is inconsistent with the Rules of Professional Conduct. However, the issue in this case is whether these potential conflicts are so inherent in the representation that it is a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct to enter into the arrangement in the first place. We think not.”
  • 16. Case Law “Whether the attorney is an employee or an outside lawyer, the debate focuses on whether only the insured or both the insured and the insurer should be viewed as the client. We think it unrealistic to ignore the client relationship with both. Joint representation may become problematic, particularly if issues of disclosure of confidences arise. For example the attorney may gain information from the policyholder-client that may affect the insurer-client's coverage obligation. But that is no basis for prohibiting the arrangement in all cases. Whatever issues joint representation raises appear to be wholly independent of the attorney's status as an employee of the insurer or a member of a law firm. Second, there is nothing inherently wrong in common representation of two parties where their interests are aligned.” Cincinnati at 161.
  • 17. Case Law “If a conflict arises, it will have to be handled, and there are a variety of means to do that. But a vast number of claims have been and presumably will be handled with no significant issue between the insurer and the policyholder. Interests of economy and simplicity dictate that this be permitted to continue. Any abuses can be handled on a case-by-case basis rather than by adoption of the broad prohibition the Wills seek. Although issues may arise in dual representation, none are apparent in this case. In any event, Celina has by contract subordinated its interests as a client to those of Suter. Presumably, this resolves by agreement the priority of counsel's obligations if, for example, counsel learns of information that affects the insurer's and the policyholder's interests differently.” Cincinnati at 161.
  • 18. Potential Problems • Non-cooperation of the client—do you tell the carrier the client has been unresponsive? • Possibility of excess exposure—make sure the client knows (s)he may be subject to an excess exposure and has the right to hire independent counsel. • Reporting to the client—see Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4, comment 2. • Who decides how much to spend in defense of the case? What if you think you need an expert but the insurer doesn’t want to incur the costs?
  • 20. Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down • Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart on your evaluations
  • 21. Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down • Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart on your evaluations • Early mediation
  • 22. Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down • Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart on your evaluations • Early mediation • Refrain from issuing non-party discovery
  • 23. Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down • Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart on your evaluations • Early mediation • Refrain from issuing non-party discovery • Don’t order deposition transcripts (beware of angry court reporters)
  • 24. Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down • Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart on your evaluations • Early mediation • Refrain from issuing non-party discovery • Don’t order deposition transcripts • Suggest a medical records review by a nurse or chiropractor (as opposed to a medical doctor) when possible
  • 25. Ideas on How to Keep Costs Down • Open dialogue with opposing counsel early—find out what (s)he needs to put the case in a position to settle, you might not be that far apart on your evaluations • Early mediation • Refrain from issuing non-party discovery • Don’t order deposition transcripts • Suggest a medical records review by a nurse or chiropractor (as opposed to a medical doctor) when possible • Prepare your litigation budget carefully and be sure to include some latitude for unexpected expenses
  • 26. HIPPA and Other Privacy Issues
  • 27. Current HIPAA Rule SEC. 1177 (a) OFFENSE—Person knowingly in violation of this part-- (1) uses or causes to be used a unique health identifier; (2) obtains individually identifiable health information relating to an individual; or (3) discloses individually identifiable health information to another person, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). (b) PENALTIES.--A person described in subsection (a) shall-- (1) be fined not more than $50,000, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both; (2) if the offense is committed under false pretenses, be fined not more than $100,000, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both; and (3) if the offense is committed with intent to sell, transfer, or use individually identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain, or malicious harm, be fined not more than $250,000, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
  • 28. How to Avoid HIPAA Violations •Do not include Social Security numbers in any documents. •Use HIPAA compliant language in the non-party requests. •Be careful to whom you disseminate medical records. •Even providing records to your client’s insurer can be considered a violation of HIPAA.
  • 31. What are the Strengths? • What are the strengths and weaknesses of your case?
  • 32. What are the Strengths? • What are the strengths and weaknesses of your case? • Are you strong on liability?
  • 33. What are the Strengths? • What are the strengths and weaknesses of your case? • Are you strong on liability? • Are you strong on damages?
  • 34. What are the Strengths? • What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of your case? • Are you strong on liability? • Are you strong on damages? • Are you strong on both?
  • 35. What are the Strengths? Use this as a guide to determine your goal during the deposition.
  • 36. What are the Strengths? Use this is a guide to determine your goal during the deposition. If you are strong on liability spend the majority of your time asking questions about how or why an accident occurred.
  • 37. What are the Strengths? If you are strong on damages spend the majority of your time discussing prior injuries and/or causation. Don’t spend a lot of time talking about liability if your client was drunk and crossed over the centerline (allegedly).
  • 39. Start at the End A great way to frame your questions for deposition is to prepare jury instructions first. If you know what you will be required to show at trial to receive a certain instruction, you can frame your questions accordingly.
  • 40. Start at the End You might also want to develop your theme of the case prior to deposition. Think about what you want to be able to argue in closing arguments and tailor your questions to get the responses that will be most effective. Chances are you have a pretty good road map from discovery responses. If your theme is going to be that plaintiff’s inattention led to an accident, focus on getting him/her to tell you all the other things that were going on immediately before or during the accident. • Was the radio on, were you eating or drinking, do you smoke, were you having a conversation with a passenger?
  • 41. Don’t Be Predictable! • I like to vary the sequence of questions based on the facts and the witness. • If you are reading from an outline, chances are opposing counsel has the same or a similar outline. How are you going to surprise someone that way? • Don’t read the outline while the answer is being given. All too often I see young and/or inexperienced attorneys looking for their next question and not listening to the answers. • It keeps the witness back on his/her heels and does not allow them to be thinking a few questions ahead. • If every question is a follow up to the question before it people will catch on.
  • 42. Mediation or Trial? • I will approach a deposition differently if I think the case has a chance to settle at mediation.
  • 43. Mediation or Trial? • I will approach a deposition differently if I think the case has a chance to settle at mediation. • If I believe we can mediate successfully I won’t hold anything back at the plaintiff’s deposition. I’ll give my opponent all the ammunition I have to push the settlement value of the case down.
  • 44. Mediation or Trial? • I will approach a deposition differently if I think the case has a chance to settle at mediation. • If I believe we can mediate successfully I won’t hold anything back at the plaintiff’s deposition. I’ll give my opponent all the ammunition I have to push down the settlement value of the case. • Springing the smoking gun (provided you have a smoking gun) on them at mediation gives opposing counsel no time to explain to his client how this impacts settlement value.
  • 45. Mediation or Trial? • I will approach a deposition differently if I think the case has a chance to settle at mediation. • If I believe we can mediate successfully I won’t hold anything back at the plaintiff’s deposition. I’ll give my opponent all the ammunition I have to push down the settlement value of the case. • Springing the smoking gun (provided you have a smoking gun) on them at mediation gives opposing counsel no time to explain to his client how this impacts settlement value. • Bringing this out in the deposition also gives you an idea how the plaintiff will react to surprising information should you be forced to try the case.
  • 46. Mediation or Trial? • If you know the case is going to trial, hold some of the really good stuff back.
  • 47. Mediation or Trial? • If you know the case is going to trial, hold some of the really good stuff back. • If you know about a prior conviction that will be admissible, let them deny they have been convicted during the deposition, but don’t let them know you have evidence that will bury them at trial.
  • 48. Mediation or Trial? • If you know the case is going to trial, hold some of the really good stuff back. • If you know about a prior conviction that will be admissible, let them deny they have been convicted during the deposition, but don’t let them know you have evidence that will bury them at trial. • If they have denied any prior back or neck problems, and you have records that show a pre-existing condition, let it go at the deposition and save it for trial where it will have the most impact.
  • 49. Mediation or Trial? • If you know the case is going to trial, hold some of the really good stuff back. • If you know about a prior conviction that will be admissible, let them deny they have been convicted during the deposition, but don’t let them know you have evidence that will bury them at trial. • If they have denied any prior back or neck problems, and you have records that show a pre-existing condition, let it go at the deposition and save it for trial where it will have the most impact. • This can be risky so make sure you have thought the process through completely—like making sure you can get the evidence in at trial. If it is inadmissible you waste any chance of it having an impact.
  • 50. Often Overlooked Information • Ask about clubs or churches to which he/she belongs. • Ask about community involvement. • Ask about their last vacation. This often times disputes claims of being unable to sit or stand for long periods of time. • Make sure to get all the names of doctors and medical providers so that additional non-party requests can be sent after the deposition. • Pin down dates of when injuries resolved. • Ask about gaps in treatment. • Ask how they found their treating physician. Often times you will see a plaintiff from the south side driving to a doctor or chiropractor an hour from home because of an attorney referral.
  • 51. Prepare, Prepare, Prepare! • The best tool you have just may be an aggressive paralegal. If the case warrants it send out all the non-parties you can to obtain all the medical and work history possible. • If plaintiff’s counsel objects to the scope of your non-party requests (includes mental health or substance abuse records), chances are you are on the right track. • Consult with co-defendant’s counsel to see what information they received. • Pull motor vehicle records. • Do a google search. • Look on Facebook and My Space pages. • Make sure you have a medical chronology.
  • 53. How Did You Find Your Doctor? 9 Q Mr. [Plaintiff’s Attorney], is he the one who told you about 10 Dr. Mandel? 11 A Yes. 12 Q What did he tell you about Dr. Mandel? 13 A That's where we would be having our treatment done 14 by. 15 Q And that was okay with you? 16 A Yes. 17 Q You didn't have any other doctors in mind or 18 anything like that? 19 A No.
  • 54. How Did You Find Your Doctor? 9 Q Mr. [Plaintiff’s Attorney], is he the one who told you about 10 Dr. Mandel? 11 A Yes. 12 Q What did he tell you about Dr. Mandel? 13 A That's where we would be having our treatment done 14 by. 15 Q And that was okay with you? 16 A Yes. 17 Q You didn't have any other doctors in mind or 18 anything like that? 19 A No.