We believe that the best way to quit smoking is to do it once, not gradually. The reason: It is better to have some painful days, but to be free of defects, than prolonging the suffering for weeks and months. The slow torture is not pleasant. You can resolve this issue quickly and more easily than many suppose.

2. The Medicine
Some people wonder why the "war on cancer" that President Nixon initiated in
1971/72 did not produce a cure for cancer. This article will explain why the "war
on cancer" has produced few (if any) results.
To visualize what happens in the "cancer industry" today, and to know what is
behind the scenes, here is a short story that will describe how orthodox medicine
currently treats cancer patients.
a story
Suppose you have a beautiful, comfortable home, $ 300,000, in the countryside
near a town. As you go to the store, your house catches fire. When you return to
your home, you see that two rooms are on fire and the fire is spreading. You call
the Fire Department immediately.
Twenty minutes later, three fire trucks appear.
Men and women take the first truck axes inside and run to the house and start to
bring down parts of the house are burned, but that are still smoldering without
flame. They furiously cut and cut and cut already when approximately 10% of the
parts of the house were burned up, they stopped and went back to the truck.
You note that they did nothing to prevent the fire from spreading. What they cut
out was not even burning and certainly had nothing to do with deleting the fierce
fire.
You watch the men and women in the second truck pulling a hose and start
spreading a powder in the fire. The amount of powder that they sprayed did not
seem sufficient to extinguish the fire. However, you note that while the dust is
reducing the speed at which the fire spreads, it is also severely damaging parts of
the house that are not on fire.
Puzzled, you ask the firefighters what is that powder. They say it is a very toxic
acid that is able to extinguish the fire, but they cannot spray a lot of it in the fire,

3. because if they did, the whole house would be reduced to a pile of rubble, by the
action of acid. So all they can do is reduce the speed at which the fire spreads, but
they cannot prevent the fire from spreading.
More perplexing still, you ask them why they did not bring water into the truck.
They said that the school fire, they learned that the water was useless to extinguish
fire at houses. They said to use water on the fire of a house is a "history of gossips"
and that the water was not effective. They also said that the firefighters' union of
State deprives any firefighter jobs that used water to extinguish the fire of a house.
By total coincidence, you are also aware that the federal regulatory agency, the
Fire Development Administration - FDA, researched the water and declared that it
is a method "untested" erasing firehouses. The FDA says there is "insufficient
evidence" as to the effectiveness and safety of the water. You silently mutters that
there must be a strong connection between the FDA, the firefighters' union, schools
firefighters and chemical companies.
While you were talking to women and men of the second truck, five men jumped
out of a third truck. They ask him where is the couch in the living room. You aim
in the general direction of the couch in the living room; you now supposed to be on
fire.
Each of them takes a 30-06 caliber rifle and starts firing on the couch, from where
they are standing next to the fire truck to them. You cry with them and ask them
what they are doing. They respond that they learned in school fire, which is very
bad to have sofas in a house during a fire, so they are trying to shoot even leave the
couch to pieces. They comment: "We think we're doing something good."
You say that even if the couch to help spread the fire, they are opening holes in
front and behind the house trying to leave the couch into pieces for the home. Also,
very impatient, you say that the fire had already spread beyond the site where the
couch.
At the same time the speed of propagation of fire due to decreased toxic acids
within two hours you no longer have a home. Firefighters, men and women, were
very proud because they managed to douse the flames. They tell you that your
house lasted an extra hour due to their work. You doubt the accuracy of that
number. They greet victorious hands, climb on their fire trucks, and return to the
local Fire Department.

4. Between fire, acid and bullets, their home was reduced to rubble. The cut of wood
that had been burned by the first truck had no effect on stopping the fire. In fact,
nothing was done the fire stopped, only slowed propagation.
You were astonished at what he saw.
You ponder why the "investigative journalists" have not jumped on this fact. Then
you realize how much money the chemical companies spend on advertising on
television and you understand why the "investigative journalists" have kept their
mouths shut.
A week later, when you pass by the fire department, you notice that all the cars in
the parking lot are very expensive cars.
A month later, you learn that they are driving very expensive cars. They sent the
bill for their services: $ 100,000. But they note in the account, the company house
insurance will pay most of the bill. You get confused when reading the policy your
home insurance and find that the insurance company does not pay the bill if the
Fire Department uses water.
You think to yourself: "What is the connection between the Fire Department, the
firefighters' union, school fire, the FDA, insurance companies, TV channels and
chemical companies"?
One thing is clear to you, you now know why all his friends think that firefighters
are heroes, TV channels constantly portray them as heroes in their programs.
As you research all the connections between these organizations, it quickly
becomes clear to you that they are all properties (or controlled by) very rich people
who are very, very friendly with each other. You acquired a new understanding of
what it means quid pro quo - you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours. You
conclude that quid pro quo of this magnitude is another term for "conspiracy."
End of story
What has just been described is as "modern medicine" treats cancer metastasis.
Cancer can be compared to fire. It is a fire that will spread even kill you. But
"modern medicine" does nothing to extinguish this fire.
The first truck is surgery to cut out tumors or parts of the body where the cancer

5. cells are concentrated, after the cancer has already spread throughout the body!
The third truck is radiation, which is also used to shrink tumors.
As the second truck represents chemotherapy, "progress" that chemotherapy is
doing is often judged by its ability to shrink tumors. Oncologists love to tell the
cancer patient that their tumors are shrinking.
But even that chemotherapy does not reduce the spread of cancer, and even though
she put the patient in remission, is almost always a temporary Pyrrhic victory
because cancer almost always returns.
To understand how all this is related to the spread of cancer, consider this excerpt,
written by a doctor who died recently, Dr. Philip Binzel:
"When it discovers that the patient has a tumor, the only thing the doctor
discusses with that patient is what he intends to do with the tumor. If a patient with
a tumor is receiving radiation or chemotherapy, the only question asked is, "How's
the tumor?" Nobody asks how the patient is going through. In my medical training,
I remember well when I saw patients who were being subjected to radiation and /
or chemotherapy. The tumor grew smaller and smaller, but the patients became
sicker and sicker. In autopsies, we hear, "Is not that wonderful? The tumor is gone!
"Yes, he disappeared, but the patient also. How many millions of times we will
repeat these scenarios to understand that we are treating the wrong thing?
In primary cancer, with rare exceptions, the tumor is neither hazardous to health
and even life threatening. I'll repeat that statement. In primary cancer, with rare
exceptions, the tumor is neither hazardous to health and even life threatening.
What is dangerous to health and life threatening is the spread of that disease
through the rest of the body.
There is nothing in surgery that will prevent the cancer from spreading. There is
nothing in radiation that will prevent the disease from spreading. There is nothing
in chemotherapy that will prevent the disease from spreading. How do we know?
Look at the statistics! There is a statistic known as "survival time". Survival time is
defined as the time interval between the point at which first made the diagnosis of
cancer in a given patient and the extent that patient dies of this disease. In the last
fifty years there has been tremendous progress in the early diagnosis of cancer. At
that time, there has been tremendous progress in surgical ability to remove tumors.
There has been tremendous progress in the use of radiation and chemotherapy in
their ability to shrink or destroy tumors. But the survival time of cancer patients

6. today is no greater than it was fifty years ago. What does that mean? It obviously
means that we are treating the wrong thing! "
Philip Binzel, MD, Alive and Well, Chapter 14
In other words, if the cancer has not spread from the tumor, the tumor does not
present any danger to the patient (with rare exceptions, such as when a fluid in the
tumor blocks the common bile duct).
It is important to realize that the vast majority of cells in a tumor is healthy. Cancer
cells CAN NOT manufacture fabric. Thus, if the cancer was contained within the
tumor, there was no cancer cells in the body of the person is sufficient to put his
life-threatening quantity. Likewise, if a man had prostate cancer and the cancer
was contained within the prostate gland does not exist in cells within the prostate
enough to endanger the life of the patient number.
Even if the cancer cells in the tumor were killed or removed, the tumor would not
solve the problem of the spread of cancer. There would be no benefit to the patient
because it is the spread of cancer that kills cancer patients, not the cancer within
the tumor.
Still, the focus of orthodox medicine is in the shrinking of tumors.
Chemotherapy (the second fire truck, in the example) is so toxic to cancer patients
that if they gave enough to kill all the cancer cells quantity, the patient would die
immediately as a result of the side effects of chemotherapy.
Then, doctors apply chemotherapy at very low doses (although they seem very
high doses), not enough to actually cure you. Meanwhile, the cancer continues to
spread.
Chemotherapy may put a patient "in remission," but virtually every patient with
cancer who goes to the remission one day out of remission and later dies.
Incredibly, doctors use radiation, the third fire truck, even after the cancer has
begun to spread. They are interested in shrinking the tumor. As stated previously,
the tumor is not the problem, the spread of cancer that is the problem.
While orthodox medicine continues to use useless treatments that only temporarily
slow the spread of cancer, many cancer patients who use alternative treatments are
not better than they are. Many practitioners of Alternative Medicine do not use the

7. best treatments of cancer. They were trained to use or the highest profit, or are they
just interested in making as much money as possible, as quickly as possible.
To make matters worse, suppliers of natural supplements generally sell only their
products, so if they have a very weak product line, the patient probably will not
survive.
When a person is stricken with cancer, your chances of survival are practically nil.
If they seek orthodox medicine, they are assured that they will receive the
treatments discussed above.
But even if they seek alternative medicine they are likely to get treatments that
simply do not work.
This leaves the patient with cancer in a dilemma. No matter which way they look,
the only things that are going well are their cancers and their physicians.
Nevertheless, believe it or not, there is good news! While the pharmaceutical
industry working for the money, Mother Nature does not work for the money. And
Mother Nature is much smarter than chemical pharmaceutical industry.
Moreover, there are some people in alternative medicine that are not enriching
treating patients with cancer and they know how to cure the vast majority of
cancers.
In addition, there are even a few vendors that have strong enough products for
almost all cases of cancer!
This rather long article, which is practically a small book divided into three parts,
will take the patient with cancer, or their attendants, through estupefações arising
from farces to which they have been exposed during their lives.
This article is definitely NOT an article about treatment. In no way use this article
to design a treatment program for cancer. There are dozens of articles on this
website dealing with cancer treatments. But this article is not one of them. When
you finish this article, go to the home page of that website and it will lead you to
articles on cancer treatments.
But for now, let's discuss why so many cancer patients die.

8. Introduction to the key question: integrity
The question of treating cancer has more to do with integrity than science. In fact,
after four years researching this very question, it became clear to this author that
the treatment of cancer, today has nothing to do with science. Nothing at all.
It is a fact, if every person living on earth to live the "Golden Rule", as it should be
lived, cancer and various other diseases were present in the footnotes of history
books.
For example, in 1976, the two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling, Ph.D., a
collaborator and doctor Ewan Cameron, published a scientific study, in Scotland,
whose results showed that vitamin C given intravenously, at doses of 10 grams per
day may increase six times or more the average period of life of a patient with
terminal cancer.
Had the medical community had any integrity, they would have quickly replicated
this study reached the same conclusion (because they would have done exactly
what he did), and would have quickly begun to give each patient with cancer,
terminal or not, 10 grams of vitamin C intravenously every day.
However, it did not.
What really happened three studies were done at the Mayo Clinic, all directly
resulting from the study Pauling / Cameron. However, these studies were not
designed to replicate the research Pauling / Cameron. Instead, they were designed
to AVOID replication protocol Pauling / Cameron, AVOID the combination of
their patients and AVOID their statistical methods. Obviously, if you do not follow
the same protocol, you can not the same results. And they failed.
Here is what the American Cancer Society (American Cancer Society - ACS) says
about this issue:
"Pauling's study has been criticized by the National Cancer Institute (National
Cancer Institute - NCI), a division of the National Institutes of Health (NIH,
English acronym), an agency of the American government, for being so poorly
delineated , and subsequent studies at the Mayo Clinic showed that patients with
advanced cancer who received the same dose of vitamin C did not survive longer
than those who did not receive the supplement. . However, the Mayo Clinic have
also been criticized for not fully addressing all issues related to the effects of

9. vitamin C, which still left questions about its efficacy in the treatment of cancer
"http: //www.câncer.org/ docroot / ETO / content / ETO_5_3x_Vitamin_C.asp
The ACS would have been insane to challenge the integrity of Linus Pauling (one
of his awards was the Nobel Peace Prize, the other of Chemistry). Then they quote
the totally corrupt NIH (Note: 500 NIH employees were recently caught taking
bribes from the pharmaceutical industry, which they termed "outside consulting
fees") and declare that a famous chemist worldwide, and winner of two awards
Nobel did not know how to design a scientific study !!
But they also admit that the Mayo clinic does not use the same protocol Pauling
and Cameron. So if there is still "left questions" why the ACS did not use his
millions of dollars of revenue and political power to correct the error and replicate
the study as originally made? 30 years have passed since the original study, yet no
one in orthodox medicine, with its billions of dollars in research, even the ACS or
NIH was made, said the study Pauling / Cameron.
Seems to increase six times the life expectancy of patients with terminal cancer is
not important for orthodox medicine.
In fact, two other studies have replicated more approximate way to study Pauling /
Cameron than did the Mayo Clinic. Both studies showed the same results Pauling /
Cameron. For more information, see:
Article eBook: "Case Study of scientific corruption" ("Case Study of Scientific
Corruption")
But this is just one of many, many cases where highly effective cancer treatments
were persecuted and / or ignored.
There is in fact a pattern. A very clear pattern. The default is that natural
substances are involved, such as vitamin C, study and evidence is persecuted and /
or ignored. When natural substances are involved, gives the name of "Alternative
Medicine". It should be called "Persecuted Medicine and / or Ignored."
There are over 300 alternative cancer treatments that use natural substances, such
as vitamin C. Each of them is more effective than the Pauling / Cameron protocol.
Each is by far more effective than chemotherapy and / or radiotherapy. All are
ignored and many of them have suffered persecution.

10. But, there is a clear reason why natural substances are ignored. It has nothing to do
with its effectiveness. The pharmaceutical industry can not patent and control and
therefore can not profit from natural substances. They can only charge monopoly
prices of synthetic molecules, many of which are nothing more mutations of
natural molecules.
What is happening to the cancer industry?
The newspaper USA Today, of February 22, 2006, mentioned that by the year
2015, health spending could represent 20% of GNP (Gross National Product).
Now let's be logical. Suppose that a cure for cancer was found; and suppose that a
treatment to prevent 90% of all problems with heart disease was found; and
suppose that a cure for diabetes II was found. Health spending would reach 20% of
GNP? Of course not. All these diseases are highly profitable for both the
pharmaceutical industry and for the medical industry.
So, in essence, the article from USA Today was predicting that no cure for these
diseases have been highly profitable discovery 2015 This is a safe prediction !! A
safer estimate would be that each new treatment for profitable diseases will be
more expensive and more profitable than existing treatments !! Here's a safe
prediction, the figure of 20% will be reached before 2015.
Here is yet another safe prediction: the media continue to suppress alternative
treatments for cancer, heart disease, dementia, diabetes etc. Website see this, you'll
be surprised at what alternative medicine can now prevent and cure:
Dementia, Heart Disease, Diabetes, etc. website
Make yourself the following question: "When was the last time orthodox medicine
used their massive profits to find a cure for a disease?" When was the last time a
cure for a disease that used prescribed drugs was discovered? If you said polio,
you're wrong. Polio was cured by a doctor in the 40's of last century, but the cure
was suppressed because he used a form of vitamin C, which drug companies could
not patent and control.
Have you ever wondered what would happen if someone found a cure for cancer?
You probably think that the person finding the cure would be on every television
show in the United States and who would win the Nobel Prize in Medicine. Such a
person would become rich and famous from night to day. Pure dream.

11. It is difficult, if not impossible, to convince the average American that orthodox
medicine today is not only corrupt, it is more corrupt than it has ever been in the
history of medicine. This is very significant because orthodox medicine was
researching cures for diseases in the 1700s.
With Big Money, Corruption comes Lots. The more money, the greater the
corruption.
Unfortunately, there are some people in alternative medicine more interested in
profits than in their patients. The biggest difference between orthodox medicine
and alternative medicine is freedom. It allows people with integrity in Alternative
Medicine a high degree of freedom to help others. However, the Food and Drug
Administration - FDA - (government agency Food and Drug Administration) is
always looking for excuses to crush people who know how to cure diseases that are
highly profitable for Big Pharma (Big Pharma) and the Big Medicine (Big
Medicine).
However, despite some chase for more than 300 alternative cancer treatments
currently exist. Each can cure some cancers, if one start using the treatment
immediately after being diagnosed. However, there is a very wide range of
effectiveness of these treatments, particularly when used in patients with advanced
cancer.
The problem with alternative medicine is that patients are left to their own devices
to find out which treatments work for your situation - - and which do not. Unlike
orthodox medicine, which is very uniform across the country, alternative medicine
is neither organized nor uniform. The search for truth is always a winding and
rocky road, especially when money is involved.
Some people mistakenly think that doctors do not use the best alternative cancer
treatments because they do not know which treatments are really effective. While
medical schools turn doctors into nothing but salesmen, that is not the reason why
doctors do not use natural substances to treat disease. Doctors read. But they also
know that if they use one of these alternative treatments in a single cancer patient,
they will risk losing their license and go to jail !!
While this attitude creates uniformity in orthodox medicine, it is this attitude which
also crushes progress. Orthodox medicine is a highly controlled monopoly, totally
controlled by the combination of Big Pharma to the American (American Medical

12. Association - AMA) Medical Association.
The suppression of truth by Big Medicine is the reason for this, and many other
websites, exist. Nothing on this website is sold, not even information. The major
purpose of this website is to make information about alternative treatments for
cancer free and available to the public so that more and more people know which
are the strongest alternative cancer treatments.
Because some alternative cancer treatments are far superior to orthodox cancer
treatments
Throughout life, you probably learned that natural substances of Mother Nature
can not possibly be as effective against cancer as the highly potent synthetic
molecules made by drug companies. In other words, taught him that chemotherapy
drugs kill cancer cells so much better than anything that Mother Nature can form.
This is definitely not a true statement, but even if it were, it would be a moot point!
The key question is which of the two, patentable drugs or minerals and nutrients
from Mother Nature, better target cancer cells.
The fact is that chemotherapy does not target cancer cells. In fact, more
chemotherapy kills healthy cells than cancer cells.
This means that the chemotherapy should be given in much, much lower doses,
distributed over extended periods of time and must include intervals between
treatments. This flow of drugs is because too many healthy cells would be killed if
too much chemotherapy were given too rapidly.
The reason why orthodox medicine treats cancer as a chronic disease is because
orthodox treatments would kill the patient long before the treatment to kill the
cancer. This failure of orthodox medicine to kill cancer cells safely (ie, reach
cancer cells safely) is why they talk about a "cure rate in five years" rather than a
true cure rate. If they can keep a patient alive for five years they consider "cured,"
even if he dies in the sixth year.
Cancer treatments of Mother Nature, called natural cancer treatments, or more
commonly "alternative cancer treatments," generally do absolutely no harm to
healthy cells. This is because the human body, which was made by Mother Nature,
you know exactly what to do with the minerals and nutrients from Mother Nature.

13. Virtually all natural cancer treatments do not kill healthy cells - even one.
That's the key - due to the fact that alternative treatments do not harm or kill
healthy cells, items from nature that can kill cancer cells can be given in much
higher doses than chemotherapy - with no gaps in treatment !!
So even if the mutations of natural molecules, called drugs, were more potent at
killing cancer cells than the original natural molecules, due to the superiority of
natural substances in targeting cancer cells and leaving healthy cells healthy,
alternative cancer treatments can be much more effective than the orthodox drugs
in cancer treatment!
Because Mother Nature does not necessarily condense the cancer-killing nutrients
found in food, some of the most potent cancer treatments are liquid ionic minerals,
certain types of ozone treatments, and other natural treatments that contain
molecules that can be condensed vitamin C such as (but not doses Pauling /
Cameron).
How effective are the best treatments of Mother Nature? Many alternative cancer
treatments have achieved a true cure rate consistently 50% in patients who had
given up on the Orthodox medicine and had been sent home to die!
These results are possible because these key alternative cancer treatments not only
target the cancer cells, they can be applied in a very condensed and powerful way
they do not require a catalyst, and they can be applied safely at much higher doses
than chemotherapy. Consider this very carefully!
Also ponder the true cure rate of these same treatments in cancer patients using
these treatments exclusively, which means that they have lost several months of
orthodox treatments!
However, do not assume that every alternative treatment is so effective. Very few
of the 300 + alternative cancer treatments can get anything close to the true cure
rate of 50% in patients given up on by orthodox medicine.
One of the biggest mistakes people seeking alternative cancer treatments is to
assume that if an alternative cancer treatment cure a patient, will cure all cancer
patients, regardless of the conditions in which they find themselves. This is a
dangerous assumption because very, very few of the 300 + alternative cancer

14. treatments are condensed and potent enough to cure 50% of those who were sent
home to die by orthodox medicine. Very few.
Example of a potent alternative cancer treatments
There are very few minerals that can penetrate the cancer cells. Two of the
minerals that can enter the cancer cells are cesium and potassium. Since cesium
enters the cancer cell, it begins to "pull" Potassium blood into the cancer cell
(potassium supplementation is required when this treatment is used to replenish
potassium in the blood that was drawn into the cancer cells). When there is a
sufficient amount of cesium and / or potassium in the cancer cell, the entry of
glucose in the cancer cell is blocked.
$2.00 Donation #Stop Smoking Now YOU will get a personal thank-you email AND your name on the
book website as a supporter. Click HERE