Business and technological strategies of Chinese firms in the South of China:...
The broken cycle between research, university and society in ESCWA countries
1. The broken cycle between
research, university and society
in ESCWA countries:
proposals for change
Sari Hanafi, Professor, AUB
Rigas Arvanitis, Senior
researcher, IRD
2. 1. Introduction
Dynamic of research and innovation is not a
simple response to national policies and
national frontiers.
Various social actors: researchers, research
teams, institutions, universities and high
educational institutions, research
communities, enterprises
Public policies enacted by governments and
inter-governmental programmes + influence
Desire to become „knowledge societies‟
Need for increased research activity and
innovation.
3. 1. Introduction
Non-hegemonic countries with two
essential dimensions:
position of the country in the international
division of scientific work
do not have financial instruments capable of
influencing the broader goals of knowledge
production.
Importance of collaboration and
cooperation policies
4. Diversity
Types of research systems
Categorization is always the result of
history
role of the state,
relation of the state to its scientists
use of knowledge in the state apparatus
development strategies
trust in science.
5. Diversity - history
3 historical stages:
After IIWW: science as a national endeavor,
and as an expression of national sovereignty.
70s- 90s: creation of national plans for science
and technology, and of drawing national
priorities.
2000s: As globalization becomes an economic
and political norm, the national orientation has
been strategically under threat. Areas such as
nanotechnology or biotechnology developed in
emerging countries despite low investments in
other areas.
6. 2. Research systems
1. Insufficient data on research and
innovation in the Arab world.
No reliable and robust indicators
-> Use of opinion surveys or polls; and
the use of rankings
No willingness to promote indicators,
„Observatories‟
7. Characterize the research and
innovation systems
Principal component analysis for 16 data
Absolute indicators (size): number of
professors, students, researchers, volumes
of production (in number of articles) and
shares of World scientific production, Gross
Expenditures in R&D (GERD)
Proportional indicators: that relate research
to population of researchers or size of the
country
Indicators of changes, such as the growth
rates of scientific production;
Complex indicators : General Innovation
Index, Assessment of R&D business
investment (competitivity index survey)
12. Relation of GDP (2010) with GERD to GDP
R=-0.293 ; p= 0.290 (>0,01 : n.s.)
13. Expenditures in R&D: The public
factors
No correlation between expenditures in
R&D and the size of GDP or even the
expenditures in Education
Expenditures in R&D depend upon
specific institutions, programmes and
policies
Universities play an important role
because they concentrate most of the
research activity
Except Agriculture, few research-
dedicated public research institutes
14. Expenditures in R&D : the foreign
factor
R&D –mainly public–funded more
often by international programmes
(agriculture, environment, NIH in
health, global foundations, NGOS,
EU funding, ….)
Few countries have the ability to
influence funding that runs in
international arenas
15. Foundations for research
Qatar Foundation
Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation
in the United Arab Emirates (2007)
Middle East Science Fund in Jordan (2009)
2008 European Union-Egypt Innovation Fund
Only Qatar set the bar high by calling for the
allocation of 2.8 per cent of the general budget
to support scientific research in mid of 2008.
16. Frameworks of collaborations
MIRA Survey (4 340 scientists having fulfilled the questionnaire; 48%
working in Europe and 52% working in South and East Med countries)
17. Expenditures in R&D: The private
factor
Low Private and productive sector in R&D
(but see Jordan = 30%; see growth in
Morocco)
40% of foreign companies from outside
the Middle East and North Africa, that
invest in the region plan to increase their
R&D investment BUT FDI has not had so
much impact in terms of spillovers and
production
18. Public and private
Table 1: Scientific Research Sources of Financing in Arab Countries
Sources Expenses in million dollars Expenses in %
State budgets 840.9 61.5%
University budgets 217.3 27.8%
Private sector 12.6 2.9%
External funding 61.5 7.8%
TOTAL 782.3 100%
Source: UNESCO (2009: 541)
19. Faults in expenditures in R&D
Very highly profitable
companies belonging to the
state DO NOT invest in research:
ex. OCP in Morocco invests 1% of
its sales into R&D….
Partnerships between the private
and public sectors in promoting
R&D have been rare and relatively
inefficient.
20. Policies: “up-grading” or
innovation?
Support to SMEs for R&D and
innovation: up-grading programmes
Rare support to large investment
projects in highly competitive areas
No direct support to successful
„champions‟ (but see Morocco)
No banking alternatives to small
innovation projects
21. Innovation: general characteristics
Middle-sized companies (around 300
employees) with verified record of
technical success and strong economic
strengths are not aimed by policies
FDI does not show a record of in-house
R&D
Innovation is more frequent than is
usually assumed rather in medium-
sized countries : technological learning
22. initiatives in favour of R&D
Jordan: “A professor in every factory”
(promoted in 2003)
Lebanon: LIRA and ELCIM
RDI programmes in Jordan, Egypt and
Tunisia (EU funding)
Technopoles: Berytech (Lebanon), El-
Ghazala (Tunisia)
Less successful programmes:
Practically all University-productive
sector transfer units have disappeared or
delayed
23. Innovation policies: the network
paradigm
Most policies assume the idea of
developing a network approach or
Research-to-industry
Clustering of industry
Techno-poles (Tunisia , Lebanon) –
mix of incubators and technopole
Funding: VC (Leb: Berytech Fund)
24. Research Systems : structural
issues
Scientific research agencies attached to
higher education systems, rather than to
production and service sectors
But see the KAST (King Abdul-Aziz city of S&T)
No Coordination
Public research institutes focused on the
basic sciences
Monitoring needed: diversification of PRI to
include medical, agricultural sciences, applied
industrial specializations, Humanities and
social sciences, environmental sciences.
25. Research Systems : governance
issues
Centralized systems of governance
(Maghreb, Saudi Arabia, Egypt)
Decentralized (Lebanon and Jordan)
more or less controlled by the
central authorities
Small market-oriented systems
(Qatar, UAE, Bahrein)
No other stakeholders than the
State !
26. 5. Scientific Production
Information problem is mainly a policy
issue : no governments wants to
tackle !
Bad use of scientific production stats.
No serious bibliometric research.
No excuse: SCOPUS, Web of science
and E-Marifa are now accessible.
Example of Abdul-Azziz Foundation
(Casablanca)
27. Figure 1: Scientific documents published in the Arab World (2000-2010)
A small and
rapidly growing
scientific
production
28. A specific and marked specialization
pattern
Mainly in physical/chemical sciences
and engineering (Egypt, Saudi
Arabia, Algeria)
Little emphasis in bio-medical
sciences (except Lebanon & Tunisia)
and relatively little to
agric/environmental concerns
Re-growth of
environmental/agricultural sciences
34. Engineering? So where are the
patents ?
Patents Granted to 13 MENA Countries by US Patent
Office (1977-2009)
Number of Patents % of total
Saudi Arabia 324 40.75
Kuwait 127 15.84
Egypt 97 12.20
UAE 77 9.68
Lebanon 58 7.29
Morocco 42 5.28
Jordan 24 3.01
Tunisia 18 2.26
Oman 8 1.006
Qatar 8 1.006
Algeria 5 0.628
Bahrain 5 0.628
Yemen 3 0.377
Total 795 100%
Note: Stats for 01/01/1977-31/12/2009
Source: http://www.uspto.gov/wen/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cst_all.htm
42. Explaining the relatively low production in
science in the Arab countries
The role of the university promotion
system
The research policy of high
education institutions
The lack of good Arab science
journals
Engage in a systematic analysis of
impact of research programs
44. Recommendations: A vision of future
Making innovation a clearly stated
objective of public policy
Fixing the cycle between research,
university and society --> Reconnect
research and uses
Research systems: promote
diversification
45. Recommendations: Address research in
universities and
Consolidating teams („labeling‟, policy,
collectives)
Interacting with others: international,
regional and local networking
Refereed Academic journals
“Diaspora” options to be examined
Better living conditions
46. Reconnect research and uses
Diversify funding
1. Few strategic funding programmes with
strong linkages with productive sector.
“strategic” and applied research: water, desertification,
renewable sources of energy, agro-food
2. Some socio-economic objectives without
economic interests (health, social programmes,
education…).
3. Basic sciences and engineering and
stron collaborations : objective is neither
socio-economic, nor innovation driven.