5. n and Coastal
69 Visitors in 2011
Hawaiian Cultural
s and Gathering Rights
Trust ‐‐ Beach Access
ional Fishing
ercial Fishing
te 40% of our energy
y 2030
cean Thermal Energy
onversion
eawater Air Conditioning
Wave Energy
6. STAKEHOLDERS AND SYSTEM
ERMITTING AND PLANNING USERS
State Planning Act ‐ County State Agencies
Plans County Agencies
Hawaii Ocean Resources Community / Public
Management Plan Federal Agencies
Coastal Zone Management Non‐Governmental
Program
Special Management Area
Organizations (NGO)
Permitting Researchers and Academia
State Ocean Ocean Energy
Leases/Conservation District Commercial Users
Use Permits Coastal Developers
Statewide GIS Program Aquaculture
8. ii Ocean
urces
gement Plan
MP is a State plan.
principles to achieve
hensive and integrated
nd coastal resources
ment
y goal is to improve and
he ecological, cultural,
ic, and social benefits
e from ocean resources
nd for future
ons.
on traditional Hawaiian
ment principles
rspectives
onnecting Land and Sea
reserving Our Ocean
eritage
romoting Collaboration
d Stewardship
ental 5‐year
ment priorities
9. al Zone
gement Program
t of 1972
s program approved in
Consistency
Management Area
ng
mmatic Support for
Management
ves and Policies
ecreational resources
istoric resources
cenic and open spaces
oastal ecosystems
conomic uses
oastal hazards
Managing development
ublic participation
each protection
Marine resources
13. HALLENGES OPPORTUNITIES
Planning fatigue Robust regulatory system
Gap analysis
Sustaining broad stakeholder Tradition of planning
involvement Native Hawaiian cultural
Use permits are case by case issues built into
and burden is on the
applicant constitution, statutes, and
Showing decision‐makers and regulations
users that MSP enables fully Federal Funding Support
informed decision‐making
Terrestrial plans do not for Sub‐Region in NOP
include ocean planning Enthusiastic supporters
ORMP is not enforceable
17. Federal members
Department of Transportation
Department of Interior (USGS, BOEM, FWS)
Department of Commerce (NOAA)
Department of Defense (USMC)
Joint Chiefs of Staff
Department of Agriculture (NRCS)
Environmental Protection Agency
Western Pacific Fishery Management Council member
Two members each from Hawaii, Guam, CNMI,
American Samoa
19. HALLENGES OPPORTUNITIES
Jurisdictional issues Form a good working
Funding relationship across territorial,
Largest cost is travel state, and federal agencies
Expansive region Create a strategic coastal and
ocean management plan that
Incorporating indigenous
not only incorporates
peoples’ perspective
economic and defense driven
Organizing various and actions, but also culturally
disparate CMSP efforts important and recreationally
across the region important activities
21. ing the PROP
ship between the
rs of Hawaii, American
Guam and CNMI
is to identify coastal
an management
s that require a
ated regional response
eased collaboration to
ely address these issues
unity to collaborate on
nd common coastal
an resource
ment topics
ay be one tool utilized
P for planning purposes
ate formalizing PROP
23. HALLENGES OPPORTUNITIES
Identifying priorities in an There are existing
expansive region partnerships in the larger
Funding pacific region
Largest cost is travel PROP governments have
Expansive region established relationships
Incorporating stakeholder Gives the Pacific Islands
input Region a stronger voice in
Changes in administration the RPB process
Leveraging science and
knowledge
24. Questions?
Office of Planning
State of Hawaii
P.O. Box 2359
Honolulu, HI 96804‐2359
Ph: (808) 587‐2846
URL: http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/