SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  9
Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, 52 (1992) 75-84 75
© 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. All rights reserved. / 0166-6851/92/$05.00
MOLBIO 01719
Characterization of the rDNA unit and sequence analysis of the small
subunit rRNA and 5.8S rRNA genes from Tritrichomonasfoetus*
Debopam Chakrabarti 1'2, John B. Dame 1., Robin R. Gutell 3, and Charles A. Yowell 1
1Department of lnfectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, and 2Interdisciplinary CenterJbr Biotechnology Research,
University ~?fFlorida, Gainesville, FL, USA; and 3MCD Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
(Received 6 September 1991 ; accepted 26 November 1991)
The ribosomal RNA gene unit of the protozoan parasite Tritrichomonasfoetus has been cloned and analyzed. Southern
blot analysis of the genomic DNA showed that the ribosomal RNA gene unit is organized as a tandem head to tail repeat with
a unit length of 6 kb. By Northern analysis a primary transcript of 5.8 kb was detected. Copy number analysis showed the
presence of 12 copies of the ribosomal RNA gene unit. The lengths of the small subunit ribosomal RNA and 5.8S ribosomal
RNA are 1571 bp and 159 bp, respectively, as determined by sequence analysis. The T.foetus small subunit ribosomal RNA
sequence is one of the shortest eukaryotic small subunit rRNA sequences, similar in length to those from 2 other
amitochondrial protists. Although shorter than the majority of the eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNAs, this sequence
maintains the primary and secondary structure common to all eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNA structures, while
truncating sequences found within the eukaryotic variable regions. The length of the large subunit ribosomal RNA was
measured at 2.5 kb.
Key words: Trichomonad; Ribosomal RNA; 16S rRNA; 18S rRNA; Eukaryote; Protozoa
Introduction
The flagellated, anaerobic protozoan para-
site Tritrichomonasfoetus is the causative agent
of bovine trichomoniasis, a contagious sexu-
ally transmitted disease characterized by
infertility, abortion and pyometra in cattle
Correspondence address: John B. Dame, Department of
Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Univer-
sity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Note. Nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper have
been submitted to the GenBankTM data base with the accession
number M81842.
This paper is part of the University of Florida Agricultural
Experiment Station Journal Series, No. R-01860.
Abbreviations." rRNA, ribosomal RNA; rDNA unit, ribosomal
RNA gene unit; SSrRNA, small subunit rRNA; ITS, internal
transcribed spacer; CHEF, contour-clamped homogeneous
electric field; CsTFA, cesium trifluoroacetic acid; TBE, Tris-
borate-EDTA buffer.
[1]. Basic to control of the disease is a sensitive
and specific diagnostic test. We have initiated a
study of the rRNA genes of this organism in an
effort to develop molecular markers for the
diagnosis of infection. The rDNA units in most
eukaryotes studied to date encode 18S, 5.8S
and 28S rRNAs and are tandemly repeated
with the number of copies varying from
approx. 100-5000 [2]. Although these features
of ribosomal RNA gene units are well
conserved in most eukaryotes, the most
notable exceptions to the general rule of the
supramolecular organization are found in
protozoa. In some protozoan parasites the
number of rDNA repeats are often remarkably
low and are not tandemly arranged such as
Babesia with 3 copies [3] and Plasmodium with
4-8 copies [4-6]. The length of rDNA units
vary widely, from 5.5 kb in Giardia intestinalis
[7] to 44 kb in rat [8]. The SSrRNA also differs
in length to its currently known extremes
within the protozoa from 1244 bp in Vair-
76
imorpha necatrix to 2319 bp in Trypanosoma
cruzi [9]. We report in this paper the cloning
and characterization of the rDNA unit from T.
,foetus. The SSrRNA in this organism is one of
the shortest reported and the copy number of
the rDNA repeating unit is low, but tandemly
arranged.
Materials and Methods
T. foetus cultures were grown in TYM
medium, pH 7.0, supplemented with 5% heat
inactivated calf serum [10]. Strains Crop-I
(kindly provided by J.M. Cheney, Colorado
State University) and UT-I (American Type
Culture Collection #30233) were used through-
out these studies. Organisms were harvested in
the mid-log growth phase.
Genomic DNA and total RNA were
routinely isolated by extracting cells with a
solution containing 4 M guanidinium isothio-
cyanate/5 mM sodium citrate/ 10 mM EDTA/
0.5% N-lauryl sarcosine /1 mM 2-mercapto-
ethanol, followed by fractionation via isopyc-
nic gradient centrifugation in cesium trifluoro-
acetate (CsTFA) [11]. Total nucleic acids were
isolated by phenol-chloroform extraction from
cells incubated at 65°C for 2 h in extraction
buffer containing 0.1 M NaC1/ 0.025 M
sodium EDTA/ 0.05 M Tris-HC1, pH 8.0/
1% sodium dodecyl sulfate/ 1 mg ml 1
proteinase K [12]. Intact chromosomal DNA
was prepared in 1% agarose blocks as
described [13]. Plasmid DNA was isolated by
the boiling method [12]. Genomic and plasmid
DNAs were restriction enzyme digested, elec-
trophoresed on agarose gels, and blotted on
nylon membranes as described [12]. Total
RNA was fractionated in formaldehyde agar-
ose gels [12] adjacent to a 0.24-9.5-kb RNA
ladder (Gibco/BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), and
blotted on nylon membranes.
Results
In an effort to identify the rDNA cistron in
T..foetus, genomic DNA samples from 2
different isolates, Crop-1 and UT-1, were
digested to completion with various restric-
tion enzymes. Southern blots of these digests
were probed with 5'-end labeled total RNA. As
can be seen from Fig. 1A, digestion of T.foetus
genomic DNA, derived from both Crop-1 and
UT-1, with PvulI, Smal and XhoI gave rise to a
single 6-kb band indicating the presence of a
single site in a repeating unit whereas digestion
with SstI resulted in 2 bands of 5.2 kb and 0.8
kb. The faint bands around 1.1 kb in the Smal
digest, and > 10 kb in the PvulI and Sstl
digests, may represent the end fragment of the
repeat. End fragments were not identified in
the XhoI digest indicating that the flanking
fragments may be very large or they both
coincidentally have sizes similar to the rDNA
unit length. The organization of rDNA
repeating unit is shown in Fig. 1C.
T. foetus genomic DNA was digested to
completion with XhoI, separated on a 0.8%
agarose gel, and 6-kb DNA fragments were
electrophoresed onto DEAE cellulose mem-
brane. The isolated fragments were ligated into
the XhoI site of pBluescript SK(+) followed
by transformation into XL-1 blue cells.
Transformed colonies were screened with 32p_
labeled total RNA probe prepared as described
[14]. The DNA was isolated from positive
colonies, digested with XhoI and probed with
5'-end labeled RNA probes for further con-
firmation. A positive clone containing the 6-kb
fragment, designated as p433, was used in
further studies. A physical map of the T. foetus
rDNA unit was constructed by digestion with
different restriction enzymes alone or in
various combinations and also from sequence
analysis (Fig. 1D).
Northern blot analysis of the T. Joetus total
RNA with labeled p433 (Fig. 1B) indicates that
the length of the large and small subunit
rRNAs are approximately 2.5 and 1.6 kb,
respectively. This suggests that the T../oetus
rRNAs are smaller than the majority of
eukaryotes studied to date [9]. Two larger
molecular length bands of 5.8 kb and 4 kb were
also detected upon overexposure of the film
which are thought to be precursor rRNAs. The
5.8-kb rRNA precursor is long enough to be
the primary transcript, suggesting that the non-
transcribed spacer is approximately 200 bp
long. The 4-kb transcript is most likely
generated from the primary transcript by
processing cleavages but the processing sites
which give rise to it are not known.
A combination of sequencing strategies were
used to obtain the nucleotide sequence of the
SSrRNA coding region. Since many of the
'universal' 18S rRNA sequencing primers [15]
did not work, the information from the
restriction map was used to prepare exonu-
clease Ill deletion subclones. In addition
specific sequencing primers were prepared
using the sequence obtained from the sub-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
6kb~
77
clones. The nucleotide sequence of the
SSrRNA and 5.8S coding regions was deter-
mined from both strands. The T. Joetus
SSrRNA is 1571 bp long with a G+C content
of 48.5%, and it is presented in a secondary
structure format in Fig. 2. The sequence of the
part of the unit containing the SSrRNA, ITS1,
5.8S, and ITS2 regions is available in the
GenBank database (M81842). The core fea-
tures of the secondary structure are similar to
those established for the Escherichia coli 16S
rRNA [16], and form an overall structure that
is common to eukaryotic SSrRNAs. Nucleo-
tides for which comparative sequence analysis
can not discern a common structure are left
5.8kb
4.0kb
2.5kb
-.,1-- 1.6kb
L S 5.8 L S
S A
E CX RSm A CBSt EH CS't E
I II II I II I II II I
D
I 1kb I
Fig. 1. (A) Southern blot analysis of the restriction enzyme digested T. Jbetus genomic DNA (1 #g) probed with 32P-labeled
total RNA. DNA samples from 2 different strains, Crop-1 (lanes 1,3,5, and 7) and UT-1 (2,4,6, and 8), were used. Lanes 1 and
2, PvuIl; 3 and 4, Sstl; 5 and 6, Sinai; 7 and 8, XhoI. (B) Northern blot analysis of total RNA (2/~g) probed with 32p-labeled
p433. (C) Organization of the rDNA unit. (D) Restriction map of T. Jbetus rDNA unit. E, EcoRl; C, ClaI; X, Xhol; R,
EcoRV; Sm, Sma|; A, Accl; S, SaII; B, BstX I; St, Sstl; H, HindlIl.
78
unstructured. The only region left unstructured
is between bases 557 and 677. Regions outside
the core structure are smaller compared with
most other eukaryotic SSrRNAs [9,16].
The nucleotide sequences of 5.8S rRNA,
ITS l, and ITS2 are shown in Fig. 3. The
U~AU
c 1150
u u%' AC 750 ~ ~u Ao,, •
U C Q A GAG = G ~ I I I''1 ( I*l CCAAUUA A A UACUCGUUUCUGUu
AAuGu CC AUGAGA AGA A GC A I I I I I I I ¢ I I 4 " I • I ( ( I U
G • l r i p 1 4 ~ i • r ° l ~ i a iAA U • (k UG C UG Q,AUOG O GGUUAA U C U UGAGAUAGAGACk
GUGGC AA G cOGUA CUU UA UCUA UA CG C_ O O G C A GA
^ u G oA c
~u G.u A........ 6SO 700 A~ . . . . .
O U 6 0 C .C ° -- C~
u Uu ~,-,.)u .,. u u .,, - 1200
G G • A C ~U.G
o G A~U CC G A U G.U
U U ~ ~ C ~ l a ~ ~ -- C
AA~UCAAUGA U mU G * U UA . A C UQ _ C
G ~ 800 A-U AUuuuu// UUuO.U
U U ~ l C ~ U U u
G ~ l C U U
, % ~,:,~ ? ', "O,c~-oo,
U GUCCGUCAAGAc// UCAA o-CCU U 0U % (i A C =
c c u_" G i, A UC ,,*d ~ ~.u 12S0
A A .GA w~ A--U
c ~ u c / Co A uu ° c A cuu c a
% ~ 550 % UA~850 ~ oG ,, ~ ~ ....
^: oo ", ..... ~^o°.,~' .~ ~ '~.~
uA A cu~ A ~111= • Uu 1000 a%'- uC-G ccu
AA Gc A G ~C A U CGGCUUG ~ AC~" UUAA u G--C A U GU )AA
c^ ~A C G u u Gu, A G C (;U ~--C U Gc ~ ~G
60o .,% ,u ,c ~ • ~ ~:c u o,/,% ~, , ~.~ -^ ^ ,,,,:%c
SUc . _uGU ~ b¢¢.0 A U'~uu C -- O ~UU ~U A CU/' U • G c" A~G ~ Co
^CUU(kCu * ~ CC A*' a G AA U C U ~ U U
Cc O.U u G C-e GA uc CA
A U U 0U GGAACUACGACC G G~C AG ~
/G G--C U • II c A--uAC A GuU % CA
UU / uo a~c u A 0 ~.U  uc u~.~.c
C // C U--A A U CA UC~aA (~ x A
Ac//AG AGUC -- G U ~JA AAG Q~t~ nGUk ii GCA
°o,'~°', ~..... ~ "t ....... ~o,,.... o,o,co,,=.,oo:
• ~C ~U CC~ AccGUcc/! II II. IIIIIli u C¢ G u
C ~-u u A ~, u ac UOU UUCCC(IU U g u
A AG--C uU., ~ U u UO A C •
u u =u, ~u ~c c c c u ~ .
uUO~uuo u u A~ x A A C U A ~ " U
U I)lll ~11~ xAC U a 0 A u
UuCCAAC ACAU u ~:A Uc C A A C //~U A U
°°°~ ,, ,'o°° "o, %° oo
UUCGGA OGUO G ~ u C A UAACOQUAG~U G O A A~
Ue,(,. Ill" G: G A .......... A ~cA CU UG
A~'=CUc cCC~U u uCZA =uu=cc=ucc, 1~-00 AA
• ,,~° Y, ~-o 1c-(~
a - c~.50 c - o •C-G
c= 350 A-u uA ~I c-~
U--AUg,u
u~u/ ~ u ~ G - C
AGAUA~cGAc A GU~ U GUUC GO A--UU--A
U C
GA Ill*it I* II=I A G*UA--U
300 .¢c aucC=C==A c= UCA AA GcA C--G
• ;'."~t% "= ,° ~ ,~
uooG,o,.~9, <,~,o°,o" °-°¢ou
u - A
< 2' , - u • 1500
u-A
C~ o x CA Ac" u-^
u c • c O-C A--U
A U c-(; u.o
u CuP' o-c I00 oc-a,
OGu O-c o • A
• C U-A
=~', ~,; u.o, %-~"
• ,>.uo .250 ,-u~ c:~
u~x,d ~ o-c u
u a~ A-U c c ~
cU c--o (L.~U
c-oc c 1~0A -- u uu
~GC A e 0 uUuo AU CA CAGUA
~$$$ , II.II I~ Ill A
UCCC A ~uACAUA OUGGUCuU
o-c au¢
U-A
O.u
Aa ~"U{i
A--U
200 a -u,o.u
0-¢
(;-¢
A--U
AC -- 0.~
A~A oUU
Fig. 2. TI Joetus SSrRNA primaryand secondarystructure.The higherorderstructureof the SSrRNA was determinedby
comparativemethodsas described[16].
79
T. foetus rDNA: ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2
1 TTCGTTAATA ATTACAAACA TATTTTTTTA ATTTCTATAA CTATTTATAC
51 AAAATTAAAC ACATAATCTA AAAAATTTAG ACCTTAGGCA ATGGATGTCT
101 TGGCTTCTTA CACGATGAAG AACGTTGCAT AATGCGATAA GCGGCTGGAT
151 TAGCTTTCTT TGCGACAAGT TCGATCTTTG AATGCACATT GCGCGCCGTT
201 TTAGCTTGCT AGAACACGCA TATATGTTAC AGTAACCCAT ATTAATTTAA
251 TACCAAATTC TCTTTTTAAG CAAAAGAGCG AAAAACAAAT ATGTATTAAC
301 AA
Fig. 3. The nucleotide sequence of the ITSI, 5.8S and ITS2
of T. foetus rRNA. DNA sequence analysis of both DNA
strands was performed using Sequenase 2.0 (US Biochem-
icals) or modified T7 DNA polymerase (Pharmacia) by the
dideoxy nucleotide chain termination method as described
[12]. Primers used were either universal [15] or specific
oligonucleotide primers synthesized on an Applied Biosys-
terns 380B DNA synthesizer at the ICBR DNA synthesis
Core at the University of Florida. Some sequences were
generated from progressively deleted clones obtained by
treatment with exonuclease III/S1 nuclease using Erase-a-
base kit (Promega). Sequence analysis was performed with
various University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group
sequence analysis programs [17].
boundaries of each of these regions were
extrapolated from comparisons with eukaryo-
tic SSrRNA sequences in the GenBank and
EMBL data bases. The length of the 5.8S
rRNA is 159 bp with a G-C content of 44%.
The ITSs are very short at 80 and 64 bp,
respectively.
The 5'-end of the mature SSrRNA of T.
foetus was confirmed by the primer extension
analysis of the total RNA using reverse
transcriptase (Fig. 4, panel 2). The Fig. 4,
panel 1 shows the dideoxy DNA sequence
analysis of p433 using the same primer. The
sequence at the 5' end of the molecule starts
with ATGAA. Since the primer used for
sequencing is a reverse primer, the 5' end of
the coding strand sequence of the SSrRNA is 5'
UACUU .... 3'. In addition, the 5' end sequence
determined by homology comparison of the
sequence, using GAP or BESTFIT programs
of the University of Wisconsin Genetics
Computer Group [17], to other eukaryotic
SSrRNAs present in GenBank and EMBL
databases was consistent with this result. The
primer extension experiment also enabled us to
determine the 5' end of the primary transcript.
Several pauses in the 5' upstream region
1
GATC
2
GATC
A
C ......~ "
if
5OO
250
2OO
175
Fig. 4. Primer extension analysis of the T.foetus SSrRNA.
The rDNA transcription initiation sites were determined by
oligonucleotide-directed primer extension. The 17-mer
primer, 5'-GCCCGGAGTCAACTTTT, was extended at
42°C using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase
in a dideoxy sequencing reaction [12]. The primer-extended
product was analyzed on a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing
gel adjacent to the products of a dideoxy chain termination
sequencing reaction performed on cloned rDNA using the
same sequencing primer. Panel 1, dideoxy sequencing
reaction of p433. Panel 2, reverse transcriptase extension
of the total rRNA.
80
A
2000
1000
0
0.0
• i
200 400 600 800 ng
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 ng
B
78 kb-
39 kb-
23 kb-
1 2 3 4
9.4 kb
6.6 kb I
Fig. 5. (A) Gene copy number analysis of the T.Jbetus rDNA. Genomic DNA 750,400, 200, and 100 ng) and P433 DNA (1.6,
0.8, 0.4, 0.2 and 0.1 ng) was digested with Xho! and copy number analysis was determined by hybridization analysis of
genomic DNA using nick-translated cloned rDNA (p433) probe. Decreasing amounts of genomic and plasmid DNA digested
with XhoI were separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, blotted, and hybridized with the labeled p433 probe. The hybridized blot was
scanned in an AMBIS radioanalytic imaging system.., genomic DNA; [5], cloned rDNA. (B) Southern blot analysis of
partially digested genomic DNA of T. foetus. Samples of T. foetus total nucleic acids containing 1 /zg genomic DNA were
partially digested with different dilutions of Xhol in a 20/A reaction for 10 min. DNA fragments were separated on a 1%
agarose gel using a CHEF apparatus [34]. Size standards were a mixture of HindIII-digested 2 DNA and the ), DNA
concatamer Delta 39 (Promega, Madison, WI). The electrophoresis conditions were: 2.5 second pulse time, 200 V, 12°C, 0.5 x
32TBE [12], and 16 h run time. Blots were prepared and P-labeled p433 was used as a probe. Lane 1, undigested genomic
4 14 l 3 I
DNA; lane 2, 6.6 x 10 units XhoI /A ;lane3,2 x 10 units XhoI /d ;lane4,6.6 x 10 unitsXhollA .
represent the presence of minor population of
transcripts at various stages of processing.
Major pause sites detected were at approx.
175, 200 and 250 bp upstream from the mature
SSrRNA. These represent processing sites at
the 5'-end of the transcript. Very faint bands
seen approx. 500 bp upstream may represent
the true transcription initiation site.
The copy number of the rDNA unit of T.
foetus was calculated as a percentage of the
genome. As shown in Fig. 5A, the 6-kb XhoI
rDNA band in 400 ng of the genomic DNA is
equivalent to 1.12 ng of the fragment cloned in
p433. Since the genome size of T. foetus is
about 2.5 x 10 7 bp [18], these results indicate
that 12 copies of rDNA units are present per
genome. The presence of only 12 copies of
rDNA unit in T. foetus is relatively low
compared to other eukaryotic organisms,
where the rDNA units are usually repeated
100-5000 times [2]. However, it was possible
that we did not detect the presence of any
extrachromosomal elements carrying rDNA
sequences since we used a CsTFA isopycnic
gradient centrifugation method to isolate
genomic DNA. Therefore, we looked for the
existence of extrachromosomal DNA elements
containing rDNA sequences using prepara-
tions of total nucleic acids. Southern blots of a
partial XhoI digest of T. foetus total nucleic
acids separated on pulsed field gel electrophor-
esis were probed with 32p-labeled p433 (Fig.
5B). A ladder of about 12 bands at an interval
of 6 kb was found which is consistent with the
copy number analysis. Behavior of the rDNA
in this partial digest also suggests that rDNA is
arranged as a linear, tandem repeat of 12 units
located within the chromosomal DNA. Geno-
mic DNA prepared in agarose blocks were
separated by pulsed field electrophoresis and
hybridized with the same probe. Probe hybri-
dized as a band at the position of the
unresolved intact chromosomal DNA (> 500
kb) and as a smear at 25-70 kb, which
presumably was partially degraded chromoso-
mal DNA (data not shown). Extrachromoso-
mal DNA was not detected in this experiment.
Neither was it detected by the Hirt fractiona-
tion method [19] nor by fractionation of T.
foetus genomic DNA on a Hoechst dye 33258 -
CsC1 gradient, which separates DNA based on
G-C content [20].
Discussion
The T. foetus rDNA repeating unit having a
molecular length of 6 kb is one of the smallest
reported thus far for a eukaryotic organism.
The length of the rDNA unit varies widely
among eukaryotes, ranging from 5.5 kb in
Giardia intestinalis [7] to 44 kb in rat [8].
Length variation occurs in tandemly repeated
rDNA units both within and between species
[2,8,21-23]. This is primarily due to differences
in the length of the intergenic or non-
transcribed spacer region, although length
differences in the coding region and introns
may also contribute. No rDNA restriction
fragment length polymorphism was detected
between 2 different isolates used in this study.
The sequence analysis showed that the length
of the SSrRNA is only 1571 bases, one of the
shortest of all eukaryotic sequences reported
thus far [9]. Only Vairimorpha necatrix with
1244 nucleotides and Giardia lamblia with 1453
nucleotides are shorter. Though not compel-
81
ling as an argument in light of the large size of
the T. cruzi SSrRNA, the presence of a short
SSrRNA is a feature of several eukaryotic
organisms which appear to have diverged from
most eukaryotic species early in their phylo-
genetic history. It has been proposed that all 3
organisms, G. lamblia, V. necatrix and a
related trichomonad, Trichomonas vaginalis,
have branched off early in the eukaryotic
subtree [24], although the sequence of the T.
vaginalis SSrRNA has not been reported. All
of these organisms are parasitic protozoa
lacking mitochondria. Phylogenetic distance
analyses based on a partial sequence of the
large subunit rRNA of T. vaginalis have also
placed the trichomonads on a deep branch of
the tree of eukaryotes [25].
At this time there are over 100 eukaryotic
SSrRNA sequences known, spanning the
major phylogenetic groups. Comparative ana-
lysis of these sequences has defined a core
structure; a primary and secondary structure,
by definition, common to all sequences in the
eukaryotic data set [9,16] (R.R. Gutell, un-
published analysis). This core region contains
in it primary and secondary structure elements
found within all life forms as well as structures
common only to eukaryotes. This type of
analysis also reveals those regions that show
extensive variation, the so called variable
regions. These regions have the characteristic
features of varying in size, base composition,
with little or no primary structure conservation
across all eukaryotic sequences. However,
within these variable regions there are varying
degrees of primary and secondary structure
conservation within local phylogenetic group-
ings.
The T. foetus SSrRNA primary structure,
while reduced in size when compared with
other eukaryotic SSrRNA sequences, does
maintain the major characteristic eukaryotic
primary and secondary structure features seen
in the core structure. The smaller size of this
SSrRNA can be attributed entirely to trunca-
tions occurring within the eukaryotic variable
regions, most notably in the 2 regions
bracketed by T. foetus bases 171 219 and
557-678. A more detailed analysis of the
82
trichomonad SSrRNA higher-order structure
and phylogeny, in relation to other eukaryotic
SSrRNA structures is currently in progress.
Internal transcribed spacers in T. Joetus are
very short relative to higher eukaryotes. For
example, in Xenopus laevis rDNA ITS 1 and 2
are 557 and 262 bases, respectively [26], in
contrast to 80 and 64 bases, respectively, in T.
foetus. A view on the evolutionary origin of
ITS2 suggests that it has evolved from a
segment of the large subunit rRNA of
prokaryotes [27], since prokaryotes process
out only ITS1 resulting in the large subunit
rRNA sequence containing the equivalent of
the eukaryotic 5.8S rRNA and ITS2 at its 5'
end. Eukaryotes studied to date which have
diverged early either lack ITS2 and a separate
5.8S as in V. necatrix [28], or have very short
ITSs, as in G. lamblia (ITSI: 41 bp; ITS2:55
bp) [7]. The internal transcribed spacers, ITS1
and ITS2 were very A + T-rich, 86% and 81%
respectively. This is in contrast to another
amitochondrial parasitic protozoon, G.
larnblia, where ITSs are C-rich sequences
(ITSI: 60%, ITS2: 49%) [29].
The large subunit rRNA at 2.5 kb is one of
the shortest reported so far. Even G. lamblia
and E. coli large subunit rRNAs with 3011 and
2904 nucleotides, respectively, are longer than
that of T. foetus. In Northern blots of T..foetus
total RNA probed with the rDNA clone, no
smaller rRNA species were detected, but 2
larger transcripts were identified at 5.8 kb and
4 kb. Since the 5.8-kb band is most likely to be
the primary transcript, this suggests that the
non-transcribed spacer is approximately 200
bp long. The structure of the 4-kb transcript
has not been evaluated. At this moment we are
uncertain about the sequence of processing
cleavages of the primary rRNA transcript in T.
foetus. However, the primer extension experi-
ment showed that processing sites are located
approximately 250, 200 and 175 bp upstream
of the 5' end of the SSrRNA.
Copy number analysis of the rDNA unit of
T. foetus as a percentage of genomic DNA
showed the presence of 12 copies. These copies
arranged in tandem were also resolved in a
partial restriction enzyme digestion followed
by CHEF electrophoresis. Such a tandem
arrangement of rDNA units is a feature in
common with most eukaryotes, whereas the
relatively small number of rDNA units con-
trasts with organisms such as G. lamblia with
an estimated approx. 300 copies of its rDNA
unit per genome equivalent [30]. Where a low
copy number has been reported, such as the
apicomplexan protozoans, Babesia bigemina
[3] and Plasmodium berghei [4] with only 3 and
4 copies of rDNA units, respectively, the
rDNA units are not tandemly arranged. Other
protozoan organisms such as Tetrahymena
[31], Naegleria [32], and Entamoeba [33] have
numerous copies of extrachromosomal DNA
elements carrying rDNA sequences. Upon
careful analysis by various fractionation
methods, no extrachromosomal rDNA was
identified in T. foetus.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants from
the University of Florida Institute of Food and
Agricultural Sciences and the State of Florida
High Technology and Industry Council Ap-
plied Research Grants Program. We would
also like to thank the W.M. Keck Foundation
for their generous support of RNA science on
the Boulder campus. RRG is an associate in
the Evolutionary Biology Program of the
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research.
References
1 Skirrow, S.Z and BonDurant, R.H. (1988) Bovine
trichomoniasis. Vet. Bull. 58, 591 603.
2 Long, E.O. and Dawid, I.B. (1980) Repeated genes in
eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 727 764.
3 Reddy, G.R., Chakrabarti, D., Yowell, C.A. and
Dame, J.B. (1991) Sequence microheterogeneity of the
three small subunit ribosomal RNA genes of Babesia
bigernina: expression in erythrocyte culture. Nucleic
Acids Res. 19, 3641 -3645.
4 Dame, J.B. and McCutchan, T.F. (1983) The four
ribosomal DNA units of the malaria parasite Plasmo-
dium berghei: identification, restriction map, and copy
number analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 6984 6990.
5 Unnasch, T.R. and Wirth, D.F. (1983) The avian
malaria Plasmodium lophurae has a small number of
heterogeneous RNA genes. Nuc. Acids Res. l l, 8443-
8459.
6 Langsley, G., Hyde, J.E., Goman, M. and Scaife, J.G.
(1983) Cloning and characterization of the rRNA genes
from the human malaria parasite Plasmodium
falciparum. Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 8703 8717.
7 Healy, A., Mitchell, R., Upcroft, J.A., Boreham, P.F.L.
and Upcroft, P. (1990) Complete nucleotide sequence of
the ribosomal RNA tandem repeat unit from Giardia
intestinalis. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 40064006.
8 Stumph, W.E, Wu, J.R. and Bonner, J. (1979)
Determination of the size of rat ribosomal DNA
repeating units by electron microscopy. Biochemistry
18, 2864~2871.
9 Neefs, J.M., Van de Peer, Y., De Rijk, P., Goris, A. and
De Wachter, R. (1991) Compilation of small ribosomal
subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 1987
2015.
10 Diamond, L.S. (1957) The establishment of various
trichomonads of animals and man in axenic cultures. J.
Parasitol. 43, 488490.
11 Zarlenga, D.S. and Gamble, H.R. (1987) Simultaneous
isolation of preparative amounts of RNA and DNA
from Trichinella spiralis by cesium trifluoroacetate
isopycnic centrifugation. Anal. Biochem. 162, 569 574.
12 Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. (1989)
Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring
Harbor, NY.
13 Poustka, A. (1990) Physical mapping by PFGE.
Methods 1, 204 211.
14 Dame, J.B. and McCutchan, T.F. (1983) Cloning and
characterization of a ribosomal RNA gene from
Plasmodium berghei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 8, 263--
279.
15 Sogin, M.L. and Gunderson, J.H. (1987) Structural
diversity of eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNAs:
evolutionary implications. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 503,
125 139.
16 Gutell, R.R., Weiser, B., Woese, C.R. and Noller, H.F.
(1985) Comparative anatomy of 16S-like ribosomal
RNA. Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 32, 155-216.
17 Devereux, J. (1984) Genetics computer group sequence
analysis software package, version 6.1. Nucleic Acids
Res. 12, 387 395.
18 Wang, A.L. and Wang, C.C. (1985) Isolation and
characterization of DNA from Tritrichomonas foetus
and Trichomonas vaginalis. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 14,
323 335.
19 Hirt, B. (1967) Selective extraction of polyoma DNA
from infected mouse cell cultures. J. Mol. Biol. 26, 365
369.
20 Manuelidis, L. (1977) A simplified method for
preparation of mouse satellite DNA. Anal. Biochem.
78, 561 568.
83
21 Back, E., Van Meir, E., Muller, F., Schaller, D.,
Neuhaus, H., Aeby, P. and Tobler, H. (1984) Interven-
ing sequences in the ribosomal RNA genes of Ascaris
lumbricoides: DNA sequences at junctions and genomic
organization. EMBO J. 3, 2523 2529.
22 Long, E.O. and Dawid, I.B. (1979) Expression of
ribosomal DNA insertions in Drosophila melanogaster.
Cell 18, 1185-1196.
23 Huber, M., Koller, B., Gitler, C., Mirelman, D., Revel,
M., Rozenblatt, S. and Garfinkel, L. (1989) Entamoeba
histolytica ribosomal RNA genes are carried on
palindromic circular DNA molecules. Mol. Biochem.
Parasitol. 32, 285 296.
24 Sogin, M.L. (1989) Evolution of eukaryotic micro-
organisms and their small subunit ribosomal RNAs.
Am. Zool. 29, 487499.
25 Baroin, A., Perasso, R., Qu, L.-H., Brugerolle, G.,
Bachellerie, J.-P. and Adoutte, A. (1988) Partial
phylogeny of the unicellular eukaryotes based on rapid
sequencing of a portion of 28S ribosomal RNA. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 3474~3478.
26 Hall, L.M.C. and Maden, B.E.H. (1980) Nucleotide
sequence through the 18S-28S intergene region of a
vertebrate ribosomal transcription unit. Nucleic Acids
Res. 8, 5993 6005.
27 Gray, M.E. and Schnare, M.N. (1990) Evolution of the
modular structure of rRNA. In: The Ribosomes, (Hill,
W.E., Dahlberg, A., Garrett, R.A., Moore, P.B.,
Schlessinger, D. and Warner, J.R., ed.) pp.589 595,
American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
28 Vossbrinck, C.R. and Woese, C.R. (1986) Eukaryotic
ribosomes that lack a 5.8S RNA. Nature 320, 287 288.
29 Edlind, T.D., Sharetzsky, C. and Cha, M.E. (1990)
Ribosomal RNA of the primitive eukaryotic Giardia
lamblia: large subunit domain l and potential processing
signals. Gene 96, 289-293.
30 Edlind, T.D. and Chakraborty, P.R. (1987) Unusual
ribosomal RNA of the intestinal parasite Giardia
lamblia. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 7889 7901.
31 Engberg, J. (1985) The ribosomal RNA genes of
Tetrahymena: Structure and function. European J. Cell
Biol. 36, 133 151.
32 Clark, C.G. and Cross, G.A.M. (1987) rRNA genes of
Naegleria gruberi are carried exclusively on a 14-
kilobase-pair plasmid. Mol. Celt. Biol. 7, 3027 3031.
33 Grodberg,.J., Salazar, N., Oren, R. and Mirelman, D.
(1990) Autonomous replication sequences in an extra-
chromosomal element of apathogenic Entamoeba
histolytica. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 5515--5519.
34 Chu, G., Vollrath, D. and Davis, R.W. (1986)
Separation of large DNA molecules by contour-
clamped homogeneous electric fields. Science 234,
1582 1585.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

MICROSATELITE Markers for LIVESTOCK Genetic DIVERSITY ANALYSES
MICROSATELITE Markers for LIVESTOCK Genetic DIVERSITY ANALYSESMICROSATELITE Markers for LIVESTOCK Genetic DIVERSITY ANALYSES
MICROSATELITE Markers for LIVESTOCK Genetic DIVERSITY ANALYSESKaran Veer Singh
 
1. dna in forensic
1. dna in forensic1. dna in forensic
1. dna in forensicajengninda
 
Genetic variation in individual & population, polymorphism, Hardy-Weinberg Eq...
Genetic variation in individual & population, polymorphism, Hardy-Weinberg Eq...Genetic variation in individual & population, polymorphism, Hardy-Weinberg Eq...
Genetic variation in individual & population, polymorphism, Hardy-Weinberg Eq...maysoethu
 
Gene expression and regulation
Gene expression and regulationGene expression and regulation
Gene expression and regulationDavid Enoma
 
saccharomyces cerevisiae: genome, Existence in haploid & diploid cell form
saccharomyces cerevisiae: genome, Existence in haploid & diploid cell formsaccharomyces cerevisiae: genome, Existence in haploid & diploid cell form
saccharomyces cerevisiae: genome, Existence in haploid & diploid cell formnaren
 
miller-chap-5a
 miller-chap-5a miller-chap-5a
miller-chap-5aAmit Gupta
 
holothuriidae phylo
holothuriidae phyloholothuriidae phylo
holothuriidae phyloila Haysia
 
Genome sequencing in vegetable crops
Genome sequencing in vegetable cropsGenome sequencing in vegetable crops
Genome sequencing in vegetable cropsBommesh
 
Recombinant dna technology applications
Recombinant dna technology   applicationsRecombinant dna technology   applications
Recombinant dna technology applicationsRamesh Gupta
 
TILLING & Eco-TILLING : Reverse Genetics Approaches for Crop Improvement
TILLING & Eco-TILLING : Reverse Genetics  Approaches for Crop ImprovementTILLING & Eco-TILLING : Reverse Genetics  Approaches for Crop Improvement
TILLING & Eco-TILLING : Reverse Genetics Approaches for Crop ImprovementVinod Pawar
 
The language of life (all the subtitles)first ppt 2 bimester
The language of life (all the subtitles)first ppt 2 bimesterThe language of life (all the subtitles)first ppt 2 bimester
The language of life (all the subtitles)first ppt 2 bimesterSofia Paz
 
97 craig c. mello - 7282564 - rna interference pathway genes as tools for t...
97   craig c. mello - 7282564 - rna interference pathway genes as tools for t...97   craig c. mello - 7282564 - rna interference pathway genes as tools for t...
97 craig c. mello - 7282564 - rna interference pathway genes as tools for t...Mello_Patent_Registry
 
Genome Sequencing in Finger Millet
Genome Sequencing in Finger MilletGenome Sequencing in Finger Millet
Genome Sequencing in Finger MilletVivek Suthediya
 

Tendances (20)

MICROSATELITE Markers for LIVESTOCK Genetic DIVERSITY ANALYSES
MICROSATELITE Markers for LIVESTOCK Genetic DIVERSITY ANALYSESMICROSATELITE Markers for LIVESTOCK Genetic DIVERSITY ANALYSES
MICROSATELITE Markers for LIVESTOCK Genetic DIVERSITY ANALYSES
 
1. dna in forensic
1. dna in forensic1. dna in forensic
1. dna in forensic
 
Genetic variation in individual & population, polymorphism, Hardy-Weinberg Eq...
Genetic variation in individual & population, polymorphism, Hardy-Weinberg Eq...Genetic variation in individual & population, polymorphism, Hardy-Weinberg Eq...
Genetic variation in individual & population, polymorphism, Hardy-Weinberg Eq...
 
Gene expression and regulation
Gene expression and regulationGene expression and regulation
Gene expression and regulation
 
saccharomyces cerevisiae: genome, Existence in haploid & diploid cell form
saccharomyces cerevisiae: genome, Existence in haploid & diploid cell formsaccharomyces cerevisiae: genome, Existence in haploid & diploid cell form
saccharomyces cerevisiae: genome, Existence in haploid & diploid cell form
 
Asnmnt 4
Asnmnt 4Asnmnt 4
Asnmnt 4
 
miller-chap-5a
 miller-chap-5a miller-chap-5a
miller-chap-5a
 
holothuriidae phylo
holothuriidae phyloholothuriidae phylo
holothuriidae phylo
 
Genome sequencing in vegetable crops
Genome sequencing in vegetable cropsGenome sequencing in vegetable crops
Genome sequencing in vegetable crops
 
Recombinant dna technology applications
Recombinant dna technology   applicationsRecombinant dna technology   applications
Recombinant dna technology applications
 
TILLING & Eco-TILLING : Reverse Genetics Approaches for Crop Improvement
TILLING & Eco-TILLING : Reverse Genetics  Approaches for Crop ImprovementTILLING & Eco-TILLING : Reverse Genetics  Approaches for Crop Improvement
TILLING & Eco-TILLING : Reverse Genetics Approaches for Crop Improvement
 
Reverse genetics
Reverse geneticsReverse genetics
Reverse genetics
 
TRANSPOSON TAGGING
TRANSPOSON TAGGINGTRANSPOSON TAGGING
TRANSPOSON TAGGING
 
Presentation slide
Presentation slidePresentation slide
Presentation slide
 
The language of life (all the subtitles)first ppt 2 bimester
The language of life (all the subtitles)first ppt 2 bimesterThe language of life (all the subtitles)first ppt 2 bimester
The language of life (all the subtitles)first ppt 2 bimester
 
Bioengineering Information for Genomic Medicine
Bioengineering Information for Genomic MedicineBioengineering Information for Genomic Medicine
Bioengineering Information for Genomic Medicine
 
97 craig c. mello - 7282564 - rna interference pathway genes as tools for t...
97   craig c. mello - 7282564 - rna interference pathway genes as tools for t...97   craig c. mello - 7282564 - rna interference pathway genes as tools for t...
97 craig c. mello - 7282564 - rna interference pathway genes as tools for t...
 
Genome Sequencing in Finger Millet
Genome Sequencing in Finger MilletGenome Sequencing in Finger Millet
Genome Sequencing in Finger Millet
 
Mitochondrial dna
Mitochondrial dnaMitochondrial dna
Mitochondrial dna
 
Fs Ch 14
Fs Ch 14Fs Ch 14
Fs Ch 14
 

En vedette

U babushki-v-derevne
U babushki-v-derevneU babushki-v-derevne
U babushki-v-derevneaviamed
 
หลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์ ป.6+597+54his p06 f19-4page
หลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์ ป.6+597+54his p06 f19-4pageหลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์ ป.6+597+54his p06 f19-4page
หลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์ ป.6+597+54his p06 f19-4pagePrachoom Rangkasikorn
 
Elit 48 c essay #2 the road
Elit 48 c essay #2 the roadElit 48 c essay #2 the road
Elit 48 c essay #2 the roadjordanlachance
 
Método de búsqueda binaria
Método de búsqueda binariaMétodo de búsqueda binaria
Método de búsqueda binariaJose Altamiranda
 
Eme6507multimedia
Eme6507multimediaEme6507multimedia
Eme6507multimedianichole79
 
Método de búsqueda binaria
Método de búsqueda binariaMétodo de búsqueda binaria
Método de búsqueda binariaJose Altamiranda
 
Evaluation 4
Evaluation 4Evaluation 4
Evaluation 4Tryst001
 
9789740331049
97897403310499789740331049
9789740331049CUPress
 
Gutell 024.jme.1992.35.0318
Gutell 024.jme.1992.35.0318Gutell 024.jme.1992.35.0318
Gutell 024.jme.1992.35.0318Robin Gutell
 
Search Concepts, Methods, Resources, and Tools
Search Concepts, Methods, Resources, and ToolsSearch Concepts, Methods, Resources, and Tools
Search Concepts, Methods, Resources, and ToolsJohn Pell
 
Proceso productivo de un zapato.
Proceso productivo de un zapato.Proceso productivo de un zapato.
Proceso productivo de un zapato.amandavictoriaoli
 

En vedette (17)

U babushki-v-derevne
U babushki-v-derevneU babushki-v-derevne
U babushki-v-derevne
 
Leadership
LeadershipLeadership
Leadership
 
Slide share
Slide shareSlide share
Slide share
 
หลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์ ป.6+597+54his p06 f19-4page
หลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์ ป.6+597+54his p06 f19-4pageหลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์ ป.6+597+54his p06 f19-4page
หลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์ ป.6+597+54his p06 f19-4page
 
Epdm range
Epdm rangeEpdm range
Epdm range
 
Economia
EconomiaEconomia
Economia
 
Algebrabooleana1
Algebrabooleana1Algebrabooleana1
Algebrabooleana1
 
Elit 48 c essay #2 the road
Elit 48 c essay #2 the roadElit 48 c essay #2 the road
Elit 48 c essay #2 the road
 
Método de búsqueda binaria
Método de búsqueda binariaMétodo de búsqueda binaria
Método de búsqueda binaria
 
Eme6507multimedia
Eme6507multimediaEme6507multimedia
Eme6507multimedia
 
Método de búsqueda binaria
Método de búsqueda binariaMétodo de búsqueda binaria
Método de búsqueda binaria
 
Subir
SubirSubir
Subir
 
Evaluation 4
Evaluation 4Evaluation 4
Evaluation 4
 
9789740331049
97897403310499789740331049
9789740331049
 
Gutell 024.jme.1992.35.0318
Gutell 024.jme.1992.35.0318Gutell 024.jme.1992.35.0318
Gutell 024.jme.1992.35.0318
 
Search Concepts, Methods, Resources, and Tools
Search Concepts, Methods, Resources, and ToolsSearch Concepts, Methods, Resources, and Tools
Search Concepts, Methods, Resources, and Tools
 
Proceso productivo de un zapato.
Proceso productivo de un zapato.Proceso productivo de un zapato.
Proceso productivo de un zapato.
 

Similaire à Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology Characterizes rRNA Genes of Tritrichomonasfoetus

Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112Robin Gutell
 
1-s2.0-037811199390549I-main
1-s2.0-037811199390549I-main1-s2.0-037811199390549I-main
1-s2.0-037811199390549I-mainTeresa Zimny
 
Gutell 089.book bioinfomaticsdictionary.2004
Gutell 089.book bioinfomaticsdictionary.2004Gutell 089.book bioinfomaticsdictionary.2004
Gutell 089.book bioinfomaticsdictionary.2004Robin Gutell
 
Hotspot mutation and fusion transcript detection from the same non-small cell...
Hotspot mutation and fusion transcript detection from the same non-small cell...Hotspot mutation and fusion transcript detection from the same non-small cell...
Hotspot mutation and fusion transcript detection from the same non-small cell...Thermo Fisher Scientific
 
Molecular systematics.pdf
Molecular systematics.pdfMolecular systematics.pdf
Molecular systematics.pdfAartisoni17
 
Structure and forms of dna&rna
Structure and forms of dna&rnaStructure and forms of dna&rna
Structure and forms of dna&rnaRachana Eshwaran
 
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_dataGutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_dataRobin Gutell
 
Gutell 043.curg.1994.26.0321
Gutell 043.curg.1994.26.0321Gutell 043.curg.1994.26.0321
Gutell 043.curg.1994.26.0321Robin Gutell
 
Western Blotting Of Camkii Β And T 287
Western Blotting Of Camkii Β And T 287Western Blotting Of Camkii Β And T 287
Western Blotting Of Camkii Β And T 287Beth Salazar
 
MFF Poster-GRBaV-AC.pptx
MFF Poster-GRBaV-AC.pptxMFF Poster-GRBaV-AC.pptx
MFF Poster-GRBaV-AC.pptxAntonio Cerullo
 
Universal and rapid salt extraction of high quality genomic dna for pcr-based...
Universal and rapid salt extraction of high quality genomic dna for pcr-based...Universal and rapid salt extraction of high quality genomic dna for pcr-based...
Universal and rapid salt extraction of high quality genomic dna for pcr-based...CAS0609
 
Extra nuclear genome.power point presentation
Extra nuclear genome.power point presentationExtra nuclear genome.power point presentation
Extra nuclear genome.power point presentationharitha shankar
 
6 molecular basis of inheritance extra
6 molecular basis of inheritance extra6 molecular basis of inheritance extra
6 molecular basis of inheritance extraTeenTraining
 
Debarko banerji sacnas ppresentation
Debarko banerji   sacnas ppresentationDebarko banerji   sacnas ppresentation
Debarko banerji sacnas ppresentationDebarko Banerji
 

Similaire à Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology Characterizes rRNA Genes of Tritrichomonasfoetus (20)

Grindberg - PNAS
Grindberg - PNASGrindberg - PNAS
Grindberg - PNAS
 
Genomics
GenomicsGenomics
Genomics
 
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
Gutell 004.plasmid.1981.06.0112
 
1-s2.0-037811199390549I-main
1-s2.0-037811199390549I-main1-s2.0-037811199390549I-main
1-s2.0-037811199390549I-main
 
Gutell 089.book bioinfomaticsdictionary.2004
Gutell 089.book bioinfomaticsdictionary.2004Gutell 089.book bioinfomaticsdictionary.2004
Gutell 089.book bioinfomaticsdictionary.2004
 
Hotspot mutation and fusion transcript detection from the same non-small cell...
Hotspot mutation and fusion transcript detection from the same non-small cell...Hotspot mutation and fusion transcript detection from the same non-small cell...
Hotspot mutation and fusion transcript detection from the same non-small cell...
 
3.wall.transcription
3.wall.transcription3.wall.transcription
3.wall.transcription
 
chloroplast DNA
chloroplast DNAchloroplast DNA
chloroplast DNA
 
Molecular systematics.pdf
Molecular systematics.pdfMolecular systematics.pdf
Molecular systematics.pdf
 
Structure and forms of dna&rna
Structure and forms of dna&rnaStructure and forms of dna&rna
Structure and forms of dna&rna
 
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_dataGutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
 
Gutell 043.curg.1994.26.0321
Gutell 043.curg.1994.26.0321Gutell 043.curg.1994.26.0321
Gutell 043.curg.1994.26.0321
 
Western Blotting Of Camkii Β And T 287
Western Blotting Of Camkii Β And T 287Western Blotting Of Camkii Β And T 287
Western Blotting Of Camkii Β And T 287
 
Presentation final
Presentation finalPresentation final
Presentation final
 
Gene expression
Gene expressionGene expression
Gene expression
 
MFF Poster-GRBaV-AC.pptx
MFF Poster-GRBaV-AC.pptxMFF Poster-GRBaV-AC.pptx
MFF Poster-GRBaV-AC.pptx
 
Universal and rapid salt extraction of high quality genomic dna for pcr-based...
Universal and rapid salt extraction of high quality genomic dna for pcr-based...Universal and rapid salt extraction of high quality genomic dna for pcr-based...
Universal and rapid salt extraction of high quality genomic dna for pcr-based...
 
Extra nuclear genome.power point presentation
Extra nuclear genome.power point presentationExtra nuclear genome.power point presentation
Extra nuclear genome.power point presentation
 
6 molecular basis of inheritance extra
6 molecular basis of inheritance extra6 molecular basis of inheritance extra
6 molecular basis of inheritance extra
 
Debarko banerji sacnas ppresentation
Debarko banerji   sacnas ppresentationDebarko banerji   sacnas ppresentation
Debarko banerji sacnas ppresentation
 

Plus de Robin Gutell

Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xiGutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xiRobin Gutell
 
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfigGutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfigRobin Gutell
 
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 104.biology.direct.2008.03.016
Gutell 104.biology.direct.2008.03.016Gutell 104.biology.direct.2008.03.016
Gutell 104.biology.direct.2008.03.016Robin Gutell
 

Plus de Robin Gutell (20)

Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xiGutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
 
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
 
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
 
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
 
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
 
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfigGutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
 
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
 
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
 
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
 
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
 
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
 
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
 
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
 
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
 
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
 
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
 
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
 
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
 
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
 
Gutell 104.biology.direct.2008.03.016
Gutell 104.biology.direct.2008.03.016Gutell 104.biology.direct.2008.03.016
Gutell 104.biology.direct.2008.03.016
 

Dernier

"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek SchlawackFwdays
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Commit University
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfLoriGlavin3
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationSlibray Presentation
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanDatabarracks
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteTake control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteDianaGray10
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupFlorian Wilhelm
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLScyllaDB
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.Curtis Poe
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024Lorenzo Miniero
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc
 
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfMounikaPolabathina
 
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfHyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfPrecisely
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Mattias Andersson
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024Lonnie McRorey
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 

Dernier (20)

"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteTake control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
 
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
 
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfHyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 

Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology Characterizes rRNA Genes of Tritrichomonasfoetus

  • 1. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, 52 (1992) 75-84 75 © 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. All rights reserved. / 0166-6851/92/$05.00 MOLBIO 01719 Characterization of the rDNA unit and sequence analysis of the small subunit rRNA and 5.8S rRNA genes from Tritrichomonasfoetus* Debopam Chakrabarti 1'2, John B. Dame 1., Robin R. Gutell 3, and Charles A. Yowell 1 1Department of lnfectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, and 2Interdisciplinary CenterJbr Biotechnology Research, University ~?fFlorida, Gainesville, FL, USA; and 3MCD Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA (Received 6 September 1991 ; accepted 26 November 1991) The ribosomal RNA gene unit of the protozoan parasite Tritrichomonasfoetus has been cloned and analyzed. Southern blot analysis of the genomic DNA showed that the ribosomal RNA gene unit is organized as a tandem head to tail repeat with a unit length of 6 kb. By Northern analysis a primary transcript of 5.8 kb was detected. Copy number analysis showed the presence of 12 copies of the ribosomal RNA gene unit. The lengths of the small subunit ribosomal RNA and 5.8S ribosomal RNA are 1571 bp and 159 bp, respectively, as determined by sequence analysis. The T.foetus small subunit ribosomal RNA sequence is one of the shortest eukaryotic small subunit rRNA sequences, similar in length to those from 2 other amitochondrial protists. Although shorter than the majority of the eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNAs, this sequence maintains the primary and secondary structure common to all eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNA structures, while truncating sequences found within the eukaryotic variable regions. The length of the large subunit ribosomal RNA was measured at 2.5 kb. Key words: Trichomonad; Ribosomal RNA; 16S rRNA; 18S rRNA; Eukaryote; Protozoa Introduction The flagellated, anaerobic protozoan para- site Tritrichomonasfoetus is the causative agent of bovine trichomoniasis, a contagious sexu- ally transmitted disease characterized by infertility, abortion and pyometra in cattle Correspondence address: John B. Dame, Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Univer- sity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Note. Nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper have been submitted to the GenBankTM data base with the accession number M81842. This paper is part of the University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series, No. R-01860. Abbreviations." rRNA, ribosomal RNA; rDNA unit, ribosomal RNA gene unit; SSrRNA, small subunit rRNA; ITS, internal transcribed spacer; CHEF, contour-clamped homogeneous electric field; CsTFA, cesium trifluoroacetic acid; TBE, Tris- borate-EDTA buffer. [1]. Basic to control of the disease is a sensitive and specific diagnostic test. We have initiated a study of the rRNA genes of this organism in an effort to develop molecular markers for the diagnosis of infection. The rDNA units in most eukaryotes studied to date encode 18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNAs and are tandemly repeated with the number of copies varying from approx. 100-5000 [2]. Although these features of ribosomal RNA gene units are well conserved in most eukaryotes, the most notable exceptions to the general rule of the supramolecular organization are found in protozoa. In some protozoan parasites the number of rDNA repeats are often remarkably low and are not tandemly arranged such as Babesia with 3 copies [3] and Plasmodium with 4-8 copies [4-6]. The length of rDNA units vary widely, from 5.5 kb in Giardia intestinalis [7] to 44 kb in rat [8]. The SSrRNA also differs in length to its currently known extremes within the protozoa from 1244 bp in Vair-
  • 2. 76 imorpha necatrix to 2319 bp in Trypanosoma cruzi [9]. We report in this paper the cloning and characterization of the rDNA unit from T. ,foetus. The SSrRNA in this organism is one of the shortest reported and the copy number of the rDNA repeating unit is low, but tandemly arranged. Materials and Methods T. foetus cultures were grown in TYM medium, pH 7.0, supplemented with 5% heat inactivated calf serum [10]. Strains Crop-I (kindly provided by J.M. Cheney, Colorado State University) and UT-I (American Type Culture Collection #30233) were used through- out these studies. Organisms were harvested in the mid-log growth phase. Genomic DNA and total RNA were routinely isolated by extracting cells with a solution containing 4 M guanidinium isothio- cyanate/5 mM sodium citrate/ 10 mM EDTA/ 0.5% N-lauryl sarcosine /1 mM 2-mercapto- ethanol, followed by fractionation via isopyc- nic gradient centrifugation in cesium trifluoro- acetate (CsTFA) [11]. Total nucleic acids were isolated by phenol-chloroform extraction from cells incubated at 65°C for 2 h in extraction buffer containing 0.1 M NaC1/ 0.025 M sodium EDTA/ 0.05 M Tris-HC1, pH 8.0/ 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate/ 1 mg ml 1 proteinase K [12]. Intact chromosomal DNA was prepared in 1% agarose blocks as described [13]. Plasmid DNA was isolated by the boiling method [12]. Genomic and plasmid DNAs were restriction enzyme digested, elec- trophoresed on agarose gels, and blotted on nylon membranes as described [12]. Total RNA was fractionated in formaldehyde agar- ose gels [12] adjacent to a 0.24-9.5-kb RNA ladder (Gibco/BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), and blotted on nylon membranes. Results In an effort to identify the rDNA cistron in T..foetus, genomic DNA samples from 2 different isolates, Crop-1 and UT-1, were digested to completion with various restric- tion enzymes. Southern blots of these digests were probed with 5'-end labeled total RNA. As can be seen from Fig. 1A, digestion of T.foetus genomic DNA, derived from both Crop-1 and UT-1, with PvulI, Smal and XhoI gave rise to a single 6-kb band indicating the presence of a single site in a repeating unit whereas digestion with SstI resulted in 2 bands of 5.2 kb and 0.8 kb. The faint bands around 1.1 kb in the Smal digest, and > 10 kb in the PvulI and Sstl digests, may represent the end fragment of the repeat. End fragments were not identified in the XhoI digest indicating that the flanking fragments may be very large or they both coincidentally have sizes similar to the rDNA unit length. The organization of rDNA repeating unit is shown in Fig. 1C. T. foetus genomic DNA was digested to completion with XhoI, separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, and 6-kb DNA fragments were electrophoresed onto DEAE cellulose mem- brane. The isolated fragments were ligated into the XhoI site of pBluescript SK(+) followed by transformation into XL-1 blue cells. Transformed colonies were screened with 32p_ labeled total RNA probe prepared as described [14]. The DNA was isolated from positive colonies, digested with XhoI and probed with 5'-end labeled RNA probes for further con- firmation. A positive clone containing the 6-kb fragment, designated as p433, was used in further studies. A physical map of the T. foetus rDNA unit was constructed by digestion with different restriction enzymes alone or in various combinations and also from sequence analysis (Fig. 1D). Northern blot analysis of the T. Joetus total RNA with labeled p433 (Fig. 1B) indicates that the length of the large and small subunit rRNAs are approximately 2.5 and 1.6 kb, respectively. This suggests that the T../oetus rRNAs are smaller than the majority of eukaryotes studied to date [9]. Two larger molecular length bands of 5.8 kb and 4 kb were also detected upon overexposure of the film which are thought to be precursor rRNAs. The 5.8-kb rRNA precursor is long enough to be
  • 3. the primary transcript, suggesting that the non- transcribed spacer is approximately 200 bp long. The 4-kb transcript is most likely generated from the primary transcript by processing cleavages but the processing sites which give rise to it are not known. A combination of sequencing strategies were used to obtain the nucleotide sequence of the SSrRNA coding region. Since many of the 'universal' 18S rRNA sequencing primers [15] did not work, the information from the restriction map was used to prepare exonu- clease Ill deletion subclones. In addition specific sequencing primers were prepared using the sequence obtained from the sub- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6kb~ 77 clones. The nucleotide sequence of the SSrRNA and 5.8S coding regions was deter- mined from both strands. The T. Joetus SSrRNA is 1571 bp long with a G+C content of 48.5%, and it is presented in a secondary structure format in Fig. 2. The sequence of the part of the unit containing the SSrRNA, ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 regions is available in the GenBank database (M81842). The core fea- tures of the secondary structure are similar to those established for the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA [16], and form an overall structure that is common to eukaryotic SSrRNAs. Nucleo- tides for which comparative sequence analysis can not discern a common structure are left 5.8kb 4.0kb 2.5kb -.,1-- 1.6kb L S 5.8 L S S A E CX RSm A CBSt EH CS't E I II II I II I II II I D I 1kb I Fig. 1. (A) Southern blot analysis of the restriction enzyme digested T. Jbetus genomic DNA (1 #g) probed with 32P-labeled total RNA. DNA samples from 2 different strains, Crop-1 (lanes 1,3,5, and 7) and UT-1 (2,4,6, and 8), were used. Lanes 1 and 2, PvuIl; 3 and 4, Sstl; 5 and 6, Sinai; 7 and 8, XhoI. (B) Northern blot analysis of total RNA (2/~g) probed with 32p-labeled p433. (C) Organization of the rDNA unit. (D) Restriction map of T. Jbetus rDNA unit. E, EcoRl; C, ClaI; X, Xhol; R, EcoRV; Sm, Sma|; A, Accl; S, SaII; B, BstX I; St, Sstl; H, HindlIl.
  • 4. 78 unstructured. The only region left unstructured is between bases 557 and 677. Regions outside the core structure are smaller compared with most other eukaryotic SSrRNAs [9,16]. The nucleotide sequences of 5.8S rRNA, ITS l, and ITS2 are shown in Fig. 3. The U~AU c 1150 u u%' AC 750 ~ ~u Ao,, • U C Q A GAG = G ~ I I I''1 ( I*l CCAAUUA A A UACUCGUUUCUGUu AAuGu CC AUGAGA AGA A GC A I I I I I I I ¢ I I 4 " I • I ( ( I U G • l r i p 1 4 ~ i • r ° l ~ i a iAA U • (k UG C UG Q,AUOG O GGUUAA U C U UGAGAUAGAGACk GUGGC AA G cOGUA CUU UA UCUA UA CG C_ O O G C A GA ^ u G oA c ~u G.u A........ 6SO 700 A~ . . . . . O U 6 0 C .C ° -- C~ u Uu ~,-,.)u .,. u u .,, - 1200 G G • A C ~U.G o G A~U CC G A U G.U U U ~ ~ C ~ l a ~ ~ -- C AA~UCAAUGA U mU G * U UA . A C UQ _ C G ~ 800 A-U AUuuuu// UUuO.U U U ~ l C ~ U U u G ~ l C U U , % ~,:,~ ? ', "O,c~-oo, U GUCCGUCAAGAc// UCAA o-CCU U 0U % (i A C = c c u_" G i, A UC ,,*d ~ ~.u 12S0 A A .GA w~ A--U c ~ u c / Co A uu ° c A cuu c a % ~ 550 % UA~850 ~ oG ,, ~ ~ .... ^: oo ", ..... ~^o°.,~' .~ ~ '~.~ uA A cu~ A ~111= • Uu 1000 a%'- uC-G ccu AA Gc A G ~C A U CGGCUUG ~ AC~" UUAA u G--C A U GU )AA c^ ~A C G u u Gu, A G C (;U ~--C U Gc ~ ~G 60o .,% ,u ,c ~ • ~ ~:c u o,/,% ~, , ~.~ -^ ^ ,,,,:%c SUc . _uGU ~ b¢¢.0 A U'~uu C -- O ~UU ~U A CU/' U • G c" A~G ~ Co ^CUU(kCu * ~ CC A*' a G AA U C U ~ U U Cc O.U u G C-e GA uc CA A U U 0U GGAACUACGACC G G~C AG ~ /G G--C U • II c A--uAC A GuU % CA UU / uo a~c u A 0 ~.U uc u~.~.c C // C U--A A U CA UC~aA (~ x A Ac//AG AGUC -- G U ~JA AAG Q~t~ nGUk ii GCA °o,'~°', ~..... ~ "t ....... ~o,,.... o,o,co,,=.,oo: • ~C ~U CC~ AccGUcc/! II II. IIIIIli u C¢ G u C ~-u u A ~, u ac UOU UUCCC(IU U g u A AG--C uU., ~ U u UO A C • u u =u, ~u ~c c c c u ~ . uUO~uuo u u A~ x A A C U A ~ " U U I)lll ~11~ xAC U a 0 A u UuCCAAC ACAU u ~:A Uc C A A C //~U A U °°°~ ,, ,'o°° "o, %° oo UUCGGA OGUO G ~ u C A UAACOQUAG~U G O A A~ Ue,(,. Ill" G: G A .......... A ~cA CU UG A~'=CUc cCC~U u uCZA =uu=cc=ucc, 1~-00 AA • ,,~° Y, ~-o 1c-(~ a - c~.50 c - o •C-G c= 350 A-u uA ~I c-~ U--AUg,u u~u/ ~ u ~ G - C AGAUA~cGAc A GU~ U GUUC GO A--UU--A U C GA Ill*it I* II=I A G*UA--U 300 .¢c aucC=C==A c= UCA AA GcA C--G • ;'."~t% "= ,° ~ ,~ uooG,o,.~9, <,~,o°,o" °-°¢ou u - A < 2' , - u • 1500 u-A C~ o x CA Ac" u-^ u c • c O-C A--U A U c-(; u.o u CuP' o-c I00 oc-a, OGu O-c o • A • C U-A =~', ~,; u.o, %-~" • ,>.uo .250 ,-u~ c:~ u~x,d ~ o-c u u a~ A-U c c ~ cU c--o (L.~U c-oc c 1~0A -- u uu ~GC A e 0 uUuo AU CA CAGUA ~$$$ , II.II I~ Ill A UCCC A ~uACAUA OUGGUCuU o-c au¢ U-A O.u Aa ~"U{i A--U 200 a -u,o.u 0-¢ (;-¢ A--U AC -- 0.~ A~A oUU Fig. 2. TI Joetus SSrRNA primaryand secondarystructure.The higherorderstructureof the SSrRNA was determinedby comparativemethodsas described[16].
  • 5. 79 T. foetus rDNA: ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 1 TTCGTTAATA ATTACAAACA TATTTTTTTA ATTTCTATAA CTATTTATAC 51 AAAATTAAAC ACATAATCTA AAAAATTTAG ACCTTAGGCA ATGGATGTCT 101 TGGCTTCTTA CACGATGAAG AACGTTGCAT AATGCGATAA GCGGCTGGAT 151 TAGCTTTCTT TGCGACAAGT TCGATCTTTG AATGCACATT GCGCGCCGTT 201 TTAGCTTGCT AGAACACGCA TATATGTTAC AGTAACCCAT ATTAATTTAA 251 TACCAAATTC TCTTTTTAAG CAAAAGAGCG AAAAACAAAT ATGTATTAAC 301 AA Fig. 3. The nucleotide sequence of the ITSI, 5.8S and ITS2 of T. foetus rRNA. DNA sequence analysis of both DNA strands was performed using Sequenase 2.0 (US Biochem- icals) or modified T7 DNA polymerase (Pharmacia) by the dideoxy nucleotide chain termination method as described [12]. Primers used were either universal [15] or specific oligonucleotide primers synthesized on an Applied Biosys- terns 380B DNA synthesizer at the ICBR DNA synthesis Core at the University of Florida. Some sequences were generated from progressively deleted clones obtained by treatment with exonuclease III/S1 nuclease using Erase-a- base kit (Promega). Sequence analysis was performed with various University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group sequence analysis programs [17]. boundaries of each of these regions were extrapolated from comparisons with eukaryo- tic SSrRNA sequences in the GenBank and EMBL data bases. The length of the 5.8S rRNA is 159 bp with a G-C content of 44%. The ITSs are very short at 80 and 64 bp, respectively. The 5'-end of the mature SSrRNA of T. foetus was confirmed by the primer extension analysis of the total RNA using reverse transcriptase (Fig. 4, panel 2). The Fig. 4, panel 1 shows the dideoxy DNA sequence analysis of p433 using the same primer. The sequence at the 5' end of the molecule starts with ATGAA. Since the primer used for sequencing is a reverse primer, the 5' end of the coding strand sequence of the SSrRNA is 5' UACUU .... 3'. In addition, the 5' end sequence determined by homology comparison of the sequence, using GAP or BESTFIT programs of the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group [17], to other eukaryotic SSrRNAs present in GenBank and EMBL databases was consistent with this result. The primer extension experiment also enabled us to determine the 5' end of the primary transcript. Several pauses in the 5' upstream region 1 GATC 2 GATC A C ......~ " if 5OO 250 2OO 175 Fig. 4. Primer extension analysis of the T.foetus SSrRNA. The rDNA transcription initiation sites were determined by oligonucleotide-directed primer extension. The 17-mer primer, 5'-GCCCGGAGTCAACTTTT, was extended at 42°C using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase in a dideoxy sequencing reaction [12]. The primer-extended product was analyzed on a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel adjacent to the products of a dideoxy chain termination sequencing reaction performed on cloned rDNA using the same sequencing primer. Panel 1, dideoxy sequencing reaction of p433. Panel 2, reverse transcriptase extension of the total rRNA.
  • 6. 80 A 2000 1000 0 0.0 • i 200 400 600 800 ng 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 ng B 78 kb- 39 kb- 23 kb- 1 2 3 4 9.4 kb 6.6 kb I Fig. 5. (A) Gene copy number analysis of the T.Jbetus rDNA. Genomic DNA 750,400, 200, and 100 ng) and P433 DNA (1.6, 0.8, 0.4, 0.2 and 0.1 ng) was digested with Xho! and copy number analysis was determined by hybridization analysis of genomic DNA using nick-translated cloned rDNA (p433) probe. Decreasing amounts of genomic and plasmid DNA digested with XhoI were separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, blotted, and hybridized with the labeled p433 probe. The hybridized blot was scanned in an AMBIS radioanalytic imaging system.., genomic DNA; [5], cloned rDNA. (B) Southern blot analysis of partially digested genomic DNA of T. foetus. Samples of T. foetus total nucleic acids containing 1 /zg genomic DNA were partially digested with different dilutions of Xhol in a 20/A reaction for 10 min. DNA fragments were separated on a 1% agarose gel using a CHEF apparatus [34]. Size standards were a mixture of HindIII-digested 2 DNA and the ), DNA concatamer Delta 39 (Promega, Madison, WI). The electrophoresis conditions were: 2.5 second pulse time, 200 V, 12°C, 0.5 x 32TBE [12], and 16 h run time. Blots were prepared and P-labeled p433 was used as a probe. Lane 1, undigested genomic 4 14 l 3 I DNA; lane 2, 6.6 x 10 units XhoI /A ;lane3,2 x 10 units XhoI /d ;lane4,6.6 x 10 unitsXhollA . represent the presence of minor population of transcripts at various stages of processing. Major pause sites detected were at approx. 175, 200 and 250 bp upstream from the mature SSrRNA. These represent processing sites at the 5'-end of the transcript. Very faint bands seen approx. 500 bp upstream may represent the true transcription initiation site. The copy number of the rDNA unit of T. foetus was calculated as a percentage of the genome. As shown in Fig. 5A, the 6-kb XhoI rDNA band in 400 ng of the genomic DNA is equivalent to 1.12 ng of the fragment cloned in p433. Since the genome size of T. foetus is about 2.5 x 10 7 bp [18], these results indicate that 12 copies of rDNA units are present per genome. The presence of only 12 copies of rDNA unit in T. foetus is relatively low compared to other eukaryotic organisms, where the rDNA units are usually repeated 100-5000 times [2]. However, it was possible that we did not detect the presence of any extrachromosomal elements carrying rDNA sequences since we used a CsTFA isopycnic gradient centrifugation method to isolate genomic DNA. Therefore, we looked for the existence of extrachromosomal DNA elements containing rDNA sequences using prepara-
  • 7. tions of total nucleic acids. Southern blots of a partial XhoI digest of T. foetus total nucleic acids separated on pulsed field gel electrophor- esis were probed with 32p-labeled p433 (Fig. 5B). A ladder of about 12 bands at an interval of 6 kb was found which is consistent with the copy number analysis. Behavior of the rDNA in this partial digest also suggests that rDNA is arranged as a linear, tandem repeat of 12 units located within the chromosomal DNA. Geno- mic DNA prepared in agarose blocks were separated by pulsed field electrophoresis and hybridized with the same probe. Probe hybri- dized as a band at the position of the unresolved intact chromosomal DNA (> 500 kb) and as a smear at 25-70 kb, which presumably was partially degraded chromoso- mal DNA (data not shown). Extrachromoso- mal DNA was not detected in this experiment. Neither was it detected by the Hirt fractiona- tion method [19] nor by fractionation of T. foetus genomic DNA on a Hoechst dye 33258 - CsC1 gradient, which separates DNA based on G-C content [20]. Discussion The T. foetus rDNA repeating unit having a molecular length of 6 kb is one of the smallest reported thus far for a eukaryotic organism. The length of the rDNA unit varies widely among eukaryotes, ranging from 5.5 kb in Giardia intestinalis [7] to 44 kb in rat [8]. Length variation occurs in tandemly repeated rDNA units both within and between species [2,8,21-23]. This is primarily due to differences in the length of the intergenic or non- transcribed spacer region, although length differences in the coding region and introns may also contribute. No rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism was detected between 2 different isolates used in this study. The sequence analysis showed that the length of the SSrRNA is only 1571 bases, one of the shortest of all eukaryotic sequences reported thus far [9]. Only Vairimorpha necatrix with 1244 nucleotides and Giardia lamblia with 1453 nucleotides are shorter. Though not compel- 81 ling as an argument in light of the large size of the T. cruzi SSrRNA, the presence of a short SSrRNA is a feature of several eukaryotic organisms which appear to have diverged from most eukaryotic species early in their phylo- genetic history. It has been proposed that all 3 organisms, G. lamblia, V. necatrix and a related trichomonad, Trichomonas vaginalis, have branched off early in the eukaryotic subtree [24], although the sequence of the T. vaginalis SSrRNA has not been reported. All of these organisms are parasitic protozoa lacking mitochondria. Phylogenetic distance analyses based on a partial sequence of the large subunit rRNA of T. vaginalis have also placed the trichomonads on a deep branch of the tree of eukaryotes [25]. At this time there are over 100 eukaryotic SSrRNA sequences known, spanning the major phylogenetic groups. Comparative ana- lysis of these sequences has defined a core structure; a primary and secondary structure, by definition, common to all sequences in the eukaryotic data set [9,16] (R.R. Gutell, un- published analysis). This core region contains in it primary and secondary structure elements found within all life forms as well as structures common only to eukaryotes. This type of analysis also reveals those regions that show extensive variation, the so called variable regions. These regions have the characteristic features of varying in size, base composition, with little or no primary structure conservation across all eukaryotic sequences. However, within these variable regions there are varying degrees of primary and secondary structure conservation within local phylogenetic group- ings. The T. foetus SSrRNA primary structure, while reduced in size when compared with other eukaryotic SSrRNA sequences, does maintain the major characteristic eukaryotic primary and secondary structure features seen in the core structure. The smaller size of this SSrRNA can be attributed entirely to trunca- tions occurring within the eukaryotic variable regions, most notably in the 2 regions bracketed by T. foetus bases 171 219 and 557-678. A more detailed analysis of the
  • 8. 82 trichomonad SSrRNA higher-order structure and phylogeny, in relation to other eukaryotic SSrRNA structures is currently in progress. Internal transcribed spacers in T. Joetus are very short relative to higher eukaryotes. For example, in Xenopus laevis rDNA ITS 1 and 2 are 557 and 262 bases, respectively [26], in contrast to 80 and 64 bases, respectively, in T. foetus. A view on the evolutionary origin of ITS2 suggests that it has evolved from a segment of the large subunit rRNA of prokaryotes [27], since prokaryotes process out only ITS1 resulting in the large subunit rRNA sequence containing the equivalent of the eukaryotic 5.8S rRNA and ITS2 at its 5' end. Eukaryotes studied to date which have diverged early either lack ITS2 and a separate 5.8S as in V. necatrix [28], or have very short ITSs, as in G. lamblia (ITSI: 41 bp; ITS2:55 bp) [7]. The internal transcribed spacers, ITS1 and ITS2 were very A + T-rich, 86% and 81% respectively. This is in contrast to another amitochondrial parasitic protozoon, G. larnblia, where ITSs are C-rich sequences (ITSI: 60%, ITS2: 49%) [29]. The large subunit rRNA at 2.5 kb is one of the shortest reported so far. Even G. lamblia and E. coli large subunit rRNAs with 3011 and 2904 nucleotides, respectively, are longer than that of T. foetus. In Northern blots of T..foetus total RNA probed with the rDNA clone, no smaller rRNA species were detected, but 2 larger transcripts were identified at 5.8 kb and 4 kb. Since the 5.8-kb band is most likely to be the primary transcript, this suggests that the non-transcribed spacer is approximately 200 bp long. The structure of the 4-kb transcript has not been evaluated. At this moment we are uncertain about the sequence of processing cleavages of the primary rRNA transcript in T. foetus. However, the primer extension experi- ment showed that processing sites are located approximately 250, 200 and 175 bp upstream of the 5' end of the SSrRNA. Copy number analysis of the rDNA unit of T. foetus as a percentage of genomic DNA showed the presence of 12 copies. These copies arranged in tandem were also resolved in a partial restriction enzyme digestion followed by CHEF electrophoresis. Such a tandem arrangement of rDNA units is a feature in common with most eukaryotes, whereas the relatively small number of rDNA units con- trasts with organisms such as G. lamblia with an estimated approx. 300 copies of its rDNA unit per genome equivalent [30]. Where a low copy number has been reported, such as the apicomplexan protozoans, Babesia bigemina [3] and Plasmodium berghei [4] with only 3 and 4 copies of rDNA units, respectively, the rDNA units are not tandemly arranged. Other protozoan organisms such as Tetrahymena [31], Naegleria [32], and Entamoeba [33] have numerous copies of extrachromosomal DNA elements carrying rDNA sequences. Upon careful analysis by various fractionation methods, no extrachromosomal rDNA was identified in T. foetus. Acknowledgements This research was supported by grants from the University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences and the State of Florida High Technology and Industry Council Ap- plied Research Grants Program. We would also like to thank the W.M. Keck Foundation for their generous support of RNA science on the Boulder campus. RRG is an associate in the Evolutionary Biology Program of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. References 1 Skirrow, S.Z and BonDurant, R.H. (1988) Bovine trichomoniasis. Vet. Bull. 58, 591 603. 2 Long, E.O. and Dawid, I.B. (1980) Repeated genes in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 727 764. 3 Reddy, G.R., Chakrabarti, D., Yowell, C.A. and Dame, J.B. (1991) Sequence microheterogeneity of the three small subunit ribosomal RNA genes of Babesia bigernina: expression in erythrocyte culture. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 3641 -3645. 4 Dame, J.B. and McCutchan, T.F. (1983) The four ribosomal DNA units of the malaria parasite Plasmo- dium berghei: identification, restriction map, and copy number analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 6984 6990. 5 Unnasch, T.R. and Wirth, D.F. (1983) The avian malaria Plasmodium lophurae has a small number of
  • 9. heterogeneous RNA genes. Nuc. Acids Res. l l, 8443- 8459. 6 Langsley, G., Hyde, J.E., Goman, M. and Scaife, J.G. (1983) Cloning and characterization of the rRNA genes from the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 8703 8717. 7 Healy, A., Mitchell, R., Upcroft, J.A., Boreham, P.F.L. and Upcroft, P. (1990) Complete nucleotide sequence of the ribosomal RNA tandem repeat unit from Giardia intestinalis. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 40064006. 8 Stumph, W.E, Wu, J.R. and Bonner, J. (1979) Determination of the size of rat ribosomal DNA repeating units by electron microscopy. Biochemistry 18, 2864~2871. 9 Neefs, J.M., Van de Peer, Y., De Rijk, P., Goris, A. and De Wachter, R. (1991) Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 1987 2015. 10 Diamond, L.S. (1957) The establishment of various trichomonads of animals and man in axenic cultures. J. Parasitol. 43, 488490. 11 Zarlenga, D.S. and Gamble, H.R. (1987) Simultaneous isolation of preparative amounts of RNA and DNA from Trichinella spiralis by cesium trifluoroacetate isopycnic centrifugation. Anal. Biochem. 162, 569 574. 12 Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 13 Poustka, A. (1990) Physical mapping by PFGE. Methods 1, 204 211. 14 Dame, J.B. and McCutchan, T.F. (1983) Cloning and characterization of a ribosomal RNA gene from Plasmodium berghei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 8, 263-- 279. 15 Sogin, M.L. and Gunderson, J.H. (1987) Structural diversity of eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNAs: evolutionary implications. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 503, 125 139. 16 Gutell, R.R., Weiser, B., Woese, C.R. and Noller, H.F. (1985) Comparative anatomy of 16S-like ribosomal RNA. Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 32, 155-216. 17 Devereux, J. (1984) Genetics computer group sequence analysis software package, version 6.1. Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 387 395. 18 Wang, A.L. and Wang, C.C. (1985) Isolation and characterization of DNA from Tritrichomonas foetus and Trichomonas vaginalis. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 14, 323 335. 19 Hirt, B. (1967) Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. J. Mol. Biol. 26, 365 369. 20 Manuelidis, L. (1977) A simplified method for preparation of mouse satellite DNA. Anal. Biochem. 78, 561 568. 83 21 Back, E., Van Meir, E., Muller, F., Schaller, D., Neuhaus, H., Aeby, P. and Tobler, H. (1984) Interven- ing sequences in the ribosomal RNA genes of Ascaris lumbricoides: DNA sequences at junctions and genomic organization. EMBO J. 3, 2523 2529. 22 Long, E.O. and Dawid, I.B. (1979) Expression of ribosomal DNA insertions in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 18, 1185-1196. 23 Huber, M., Koller, B., Gitler, C., Mirelman, D., Revel, M., Rozenblatt, S. and Garfinkel, L. (1989) Entamoeba histolytica ribosomal RNA genes are carried on palindromic circular DNA molecules. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 32, 285 296. 24 Sogin, M.L. (1989) Evolution of eukaryotic micro- organisms and their small subunit ribosomal RNAs. Am. Zool. 29, 487499. 25 Baroin, A., Perasso, R., Qu, L.-H., Brugerolle, G., Bachellerie, J.-P. and Adoutte, A. (1988) Partial phylogeny of the unicellular eukaryotes based on rapid sequencing of a portion of 28S ribosomal RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 3474~3478. 26 Hall, L.M.C. and Maden, B.E.H. (1980) Nucleotide sequence through the 18S-28S intergene region of a vertebrate ribosomal transcription unit. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 5993 6005. 27 Gray, M.E. and Schnare, M.N. (1990) Evolution of the modular structure of rRNA. In: The Ribosomes, (Hill, W.E., Dahlberg, A., Garrett, R.A., Moore, P.B., Schlessinger, D. and Warner, J.R., ed.) pp.589 595, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. 28 Vossbrinck, C.R. and Woese, C.R. (1986) Eukaryotic ribosomes that lack a 5.8S RNA. Nature 320, 287 288. 29 Edlind, T.D., Sharetzsky, C. and Cha, M.E. (1990) Ribosomal RNA of the primitive eukaryotic Giardia lamblia: large subunit domain l and potential processing signals. Gene 96, 289-293. 30 Edlind, T.D. and Chakraborty, P.R. (1987) Unusual ribosomal RNA of the intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 7889 7901. 31 Engberg, J. (1985) The ribosomal RNA genes of Tetrahymena: Structure and function. European J. Cell Biol. 36, 133 151. 32 Clark, C.G. and Cross, G.A.M. (1987) rRNA genes of Naegleria gruberi are carried exclusively on a 14- kilobase-pair plasmid. Mol. Celt. Biol. 7, 3027 3031. 33 Grodberg,.J., Salazar, N., Oren, R. and Mirelman, D. (1990) Autonomous replication sequences in an extra- chromosomal element of apathogenic Entamoeba histolytica. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 5515--5519. 34 Chu, G., Vollrath, D. and Davis, R.W. (1986) Separation of large DNA molecules by contour- clamped homogeneous electric fields. Science 234, 1582 1585.