SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  40
Entr y into INDIA
……… A lesson in
 GLOBALIZATION.
AN ABSTRACT
  It took half decade of negotiating, 20 debates in Parliament
and a monumental public relations campaign for Pepsi to enter
India.
  Not exactly Pepsi-Cola, it was called Lehar Pepsi, a concession
to the anti-foreign lobby.
 It appear only in Jaipur, Kanpur, Bangalore and Punjab.
  Christopher Sinclair, the President of Pepsi-Cola International,
called his company’s venture in India “An Historic Agreement.”
  PepsiCo’s move into the Indian market was made possible by
the company’s willingness to take a 36.9% share in a
conglomerate called “Pepsi Foods Private Limited”
  It’s a co-owners were Punjab Agro Industries and Voltas a
subsidiar y of TATA Group.
AN ABSTRACT
  PepsiCo agreed to set up fruit and vegetable processing
plants, agriculture research stations, franchised bottling
operations and snack-food factories using local potatoes and
other ingredients.
 It is also planned to invest more than $1Billion in India by
1998.
 First plants were built in nor thern Punjab State
  Pepsi Food Private Ltd had planned to call his flagship drink
“Pepsi Era” but opponents challenge a name under a law.
  Lehar Pepsi,7-Up and Miranda got an unexpected assist when
Government decide in April 1989, to begin an enforcing a two
year ban on the use of brominated use of vegetable oil.
"Convincing India that it needs
Western junk has not been easy."
 - A New Internationalist Magazine Article, commenting on
       Pepsi's struggle to enter India, in August 1988
A Letter to PEPSI
   In 1988, the New York office of the 
    President of the multi­billion cola 
    company PepsiCo received a letter from 
    India.
   The company had been trying for some 
    time to enter the Indian market ­ without 
    much success.
   The letter was written by George 
    Fernandes (Fernandes), The General 
    Secretary of one of the country's leading 
    political parties, Janata Dal.
A Letter to PEPSI
"I learned that you are coming 
   here. I am the one that threw 
   Coca­Cola out, and we are soon 
   going to come back into the 
   government. If you come into 
   the country, you have to 
   remember that the same fate 
   awaits you as Coca­Cola."
                           George Fernandes 
            The General Secretary – Janta Dal
PEPSI’S ENTRY INTO INDIA
                           Before
 Before this Coca-cola had been thrown out of India in1977.

 Even in 1980’s economy was marked by high government
inter ventions.
 Pepsi though, was looking India for couple of reasons,

 The US market seems to be reaching its saturation level.

 India was always a market that ever y MNC wanted to enter . .
( reason ver y vast population).
 Urbanization familiarized Indians with global brands.

 Low per capita consumption of sof t drink, 3 bottles p.a. as
compared to 63 for Egypt, 38 for Thailand and 13 for Pakistan.
THE PROMISES - PEPSI’S ENTER
 May 1985, PepsiCo had joined hands with the R P Goenka
(RPG) group, to begin operations in the nor th Indian state of
Punjab.
 Agro Product Expor t Ltd., planned to impor t the cola
concentrate and sell sof t drinks under the Pepsi label.
 Make its proposal attractive to the Indian government

 Objectives -revolved around 'promoting and developing the
expor t of Indian agro-based products
 The government rejected this proposal primarily on two
grounds:
1. Did not accept the clause regarding the impor t
2. Use of a foreign brand name (Pepsi) was not allowed
 RPG group too ended at this juncture
THE PROMISES - PEPSI’S ENTER
 Decision to link its entr y with the development and welfare of
the state of Punjab.
 Fact that Punjab boasted a healthy agricultural sector

 Entr y on agriculture and employment

 New employment oppor tunities would tempt many of the
terrorists to return to society...
 Focus on food & agro-processing only 25% investment for Sof t
drink Bring advanced food processing technology & Boost image
of Made in India to Foreign Market
 The Ex-Im ration 5:1 for 10 years

 80% Expor t of Company & 20% Expor t of Selected
Manufacturer
 50K Jobs in India & 25K in Punjab, No Foreign Brand Names
used & Agriculture Research Center
PEPSI ENTERED

   Govt. Quite impressed with T&C Proposed
   In 1988 Finally Cleared by the Govt.
   JV – PAIC (Punjab Agro Ind. Corp.) &
    Voltas India Ltd. (TATA)
   JV Stake PEPSI – 36.89, Voltas – 36.11%
    & PAIC – 24%
   In 1989 Launched the Soft Drinks with
    Great Fanfare & Multi-Media advertising
    Campaing
PEPSI ENTERED
        JV – Stakes - 1988


                            24




36.89


                                 PEPSI
                                 Voltas
                                 PAIC




                    36.11
Marketing Expert – PHILIP KOTLER
   Some year later Commenting, how the
    company used Mega Marketing to enter the
    Indian Market
   Pepsi bundled a set of benifits that won the
    support of various interest groups in India.
   Instead of relying on the normal four P's
    added two P's – Politics & Public Opinion
   Committing towards developing Rural economy
    & Bringing Technologies for Food Processing &
    water treatment
   Turned a lot of Votes in Pepsi Co's favor.
PEPSI's 6 P's
  Product
  Price
  Place
  Promotion
  People &
  Politics
Promises Keep Some, Break Some!
 Pepsi began by setting up a fruit and vegetable processing
plant at Zahura village in Punjab's Hoshiarpur district.
   Focus on processing tomatoes to make tomato paste
 Local varieties of tomatoes were found to be of inferior
quality
   Imported the required material for tomato cultivation.
   Agreements with a few big farmers
 The agro-climatic profile of Punjab was not exactly suitable
for a crop like tomato
 Chosen the state because farmers were progressive,
landholdings were on the larger side, & water availability was
sufficient
 Experts from the US had to interact extensively with the
farmers
PROMISES ARE MEANT TO BE BROKEN
 On payments by cheque, found out that 80% of the farmers
did not even have a bank account..!
 Croped Harvested 1990, Plant not been made operational
Farmer had to bear losses of 2.5 Millions
   Pepsi paid Rs. 0.75/Kg & Market Price was Rs. 2.00/Kg
 Fails to Creat Jobs, Promised for 50000 Jobs but by 1991 -
783 Employed, 1992 – 909, & By 1996 – 2400 people as Direct
Employees. Pepsi Claimed Employed 26000 as Indirect
Employment
 Industry Commeted company included the small vendors who
sold soft drinks as indirect employees. It could not be regarded
as the employees of Pepsi
  Information revealed that more than 50% employees working
in its bottling business and not for food processing activities.
Promises Keep Some, Break Some!
 It also had major holding in Futura Polymers Ltd. Recyling
plastic – a capital intensive firm.
 The use of name “Lehar Pepsi” also attracted much
contraversey.
  Pepsi also failed to adhere its commitment to export 50% of
its production.
 It began exporting tea, rice, shrimps, glass bottles, leather
products, champagne as against fruit or vegetable based
products has always been exported.
 There was even a show cause notice to Pepsi company by
Ministry of Commerce, to which company paid no attention.
   Luckily for Pepsi, it did not have to face criticism for long
India Liberalizes - A Boon For Pepsi
    In the early 1990s, the Government of India was
    facing a foreign exchange crisis.
 Organizations like the International Monetary Fund
    agreed to help the government.
 Condition that it liberalized the Indian economy.
 The Process included:removal of numerous
    restriction on foreign trade and increased the role of
    Private Equity in Indian market.
 Pepsi benefited from the economic changes in many
    ways.
 The Company took full Adavantage of New Economic
    Policy
India Liberalizes - A Boon For Pepsi
 Bought off its partners in Joint Venture. A Wholly-
 Owned subsidairy.
 PepsiCo Holdings India Pvt. Ltd. (PHI) – Devoted Soft
 Drinks Business. Changed Cola Name from Lehar
 Pepsi to Pepsi.
 Decision to sell off its Tomato Paste Plant to the
 Indian FMCG major, Hindustan Lever Ltd. (HLL).
 1995 – Beverages business grew by as much as 50%
 1996 – PHI – Pepsi's turnover by Rs. 1.25 Billion,
 1.5% Fruit & Vegetable Exports & 67% Plastic
 Exports
 1997 – The Agro Research Center promised by the
 Company was nowhere in sight.
Pepsi Goes Farming - Finally
 Though Pepsi attracted a lot of criticism, many people
  felt there was a positive side to the company's entry into
  India.
 Pepsi’s tomato farming project shot up India’s tomato
  production from 4.25mn tonnes in ’91-92 to 5.44mn tonnes
  in ’95-96.
 Punjab’s overall tomato productivity went up from 28,000
  tonnes to 250,000 tonnes and per hectare from 16 tonnes
  to 50 tonnes.
 The company offer its contract farmers, free of cost,
  some advanced equipments such as transplanters and
  seedling machines.
 It also set up agriculture research centers in Jallowal
  and Chano (Punjab) and Nelamangala(Karnataka).
 Though “Pepsi Agri Backward Integration Programme”
  the company encouraged Punjab farmers to cultivate
  potatoes with low sugar content.
AFTER ALL PEPSI WASN’T THAT BAD
         PEPSI’S ENTRY-INDIAN BENEFITS
    It extended it contracts farming initiatives to
    groundnuts in the year 2000.
 The project initiated in Punjab and then in
    Gujarat.
 By using improved technology from China, the
    per hectare yield improve from 1tonne to 3.5-
    4.5tonnes.
 Pepsi invested additional Rs.3.75bn in spread
    over 3 years (2000-2002) in Karnataka over and
    above the existing investment of Rs.1.4bn
 Since its entry to India company already
    invested Rs.18bn by the year 2000.
 8000 people were working for the Company
DOING BUSINESS ON ITS OWN
                  TERMS……..
 In 2000 Pepsi’s export added up to Rs. 3bn.
 It included processed foods, basmati rice, guar gums and
  even soft drink concentrate.
 Even by 2000 it could procure only 3,000 tonnes of
  potatoes p.a. as against its requirement of 25,000 tonnes.
 In 2002, company entered into various contract farming
  deals.
 It joined hands with Punjab Agri Export Corporation to
  process citrus fruits for its Tropicana project in August
  2002.
 The company also initiated, first of its kind, organized
  and commercial seaweed farming in Tamilnadu.
 By 2003, Pepsi’s soft drinks, snacks, fruit juices and
  mineral water business had established themselves firmly
  in India.
Questions . . ?


1. Why do Companies like Pepsi need to
 Globalize? What are the various ways
 in which Foreign Companies can enter
 a Foreign Market? What hurdels and
 problems did Pepsi face when it tried
 to enter India during the 1980s?
Companies like Pepsi 
      Need to be global for the Following
* Expand Sales- Increase the market for their production by
 tapping potential new countries
* Minimize Risks- Globalization and International trade also
 helps in minimizing risks.
* To leverage on technology
* To increase production efficiencies
* For diversification so as to reduce risks
* To counter foreign investments by competitors
* Minimize Costs and optimal resource utilization- By shifting
 operations in areas with cheaper labour and resources.
Companies can enter foreign markets 
       through the following ways:
* Export – Direct & Indirect
* JV - Joint Ventures
* Mergers and Acquisitions
* Licensing, Franchising
* Strategic Alliances
* Management Contracts
* Contract Manufacturing
* FDI – Foreign Direct Investments
Hurdles faced by Pepsi
* India being a closed economy till 1991, there was high level of
 intervention by the government in the corporate sector
* Low awareness, demand and consumption for soft drinks. The
 per capita consumption was only 3 per annum
* Foreign brand name could not be used
* There was no liberalization and this not even 1% FDI was
 allowed.
* Sensitive political and social problems in the country like
 terrorism
* Cola concentrate – the major ingredient to make Pepsi soft
 drink could not be imported
* Agriculture sector was the priority and thus Pepsi had to win
 the government by making promises of development in the
 agriculture sector
Questions . . ?
2. Critically analyze the strategy
 adopted by Pepsi to sell itself to the
 Indian Government. Do you think the
 biggest Factor Responsible for the
 acceptance of its proposal by the
 Regulatory Authorities was its
 Projection of its Operations as the
 solution to many of Punjab's
 Problems? Why/Why Not?
Strategy Adopted by Pespi
    Promoting and developing the export of Indian
    Agro-based products, though it got rejected.
 Each cola import would be in return of exporting
    juice concentrate from Punjab.
 Development and Welfare of State.
 Bringing about Agriculture Revolution in state.
 Creating Employments.
 Terrorists to return to society.
 Punjab boasted a healthy agricultural sector
Strategy Adopted by Pespi
 Development of Areas it planned to operate in
 Directing major (75%) investment towards
 agricultural sector
 Focusing on food and Agro-processing.
 Boosting the image of Indian products in foreign
 market.
 Establishing Agricultural Research Centre.
 More emphasis on Exports than imports to
 improvise the balance of payment.
Reson for Acceptance of Proposal
     By the Regulatory Authorities 

 Yes, Most of the commitments were related
 with Punjab therefore it is the biggest factor
 responsible for acceptance of Pepsi.
Questions . . ?
3. How did the Company react to the
 changes in the Business Environment
 after the Liberalization of the Indian
 Economy in the early 1990s? Critically
 comment on the allegation that Pepsi
 deliberatly did not adhere to most of
 its commitments.
After Liberalization 

 In 1994, it bought off its partner in venture i.e. Voltas
  and PAIC.
 Establishing wholly owned subsidiary PepsiCo Holding
  India Pvt. Ltd.
 Changed name from “Lehar Pepsi” to “Pepsi”
 Sold off its Tomato Paste Plant in 1995
 Gradually reduce the contract farming
 Plastic Exports were 67%.
 Till 1997, the agro research centre was no where.
Allegation 
 Failing to create jobs
 50% of employee working for Concentrate and
 Bottling Business not for Food processing Business.
 Pepsi with Futura Polymers Ltd. were reducing the
 workforce and more machine oriented
 More lasting impression of “Pepsi” and “Lehar Pepsi”.
 Export of fruit & vegetable based products was
 negligible & started exporting Tea, Rice & Shrimps
 Failed its commitment to export 50% production.
 Products exported were same which use to happen
 earlier.
Questions . . ?

4. Examine the Contract Farming
 initiatives undertaken by Pepsi in India
 and Explain the rationale for such
 initiative from the Company's
 Perspective. Why is it important for
 Multinational Corporations to Work
 towards the Improvement of the
 Economy of the Countries in which
 they Operate? What are the other
 various ways in which this can be
 done?
Contract Farming Initiative

 Increase in Tomato crop production
 Providing High yield seeds to increase the
 productivity in the tomato cultivation
 Offered advanced equipments (Free of cost) to
 increase the speed & efficiency
 Imported the required material for tomato
 cultivation
Rationale for Contract Farming

 Rationale behind the contract farming was that in one
 or the other way company insisted on the development
 of those crops which were directly or indirectly related
 to their businesses such as soft drinks, snacks, fruit
 juices & mineral water.
 Other rationale behind the contract farming was to
 increase their own business rather than any social
 welfare.
Rationale for Contract Farming

Taken initiative for
 Chilly farming
 Groundnuts production over paddy production
 Rice production
 Fruits & Vegetable Farming
Encouraging farmers to cultivate potato with low
 sugar content for chips.
Case Study - References
 Case written by A. Mukund.
 ICFAI Center for Management Research.
 Slideshare.net – agarwalpuneet11 Slides
 Project Reference: IIM Calcutta.
 Times Of India
 Washington Post.
Thank
  You


ITM Malad
SMBA - 18
Presented    By
    Group No.    04
Prassanna Ghorpade
Jay Sanghrajka
Pooja Dave
Vishal Sawant
Mehul Shah
Nidhi Sheth
Shubhangi Panchal
MCE - Multinational Corporate
       Environment
        Case Study
        Submited to
         Prof. Abdul
             On
         16/12/2012
              At
   ITM Malad – SMBA – 18

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Distribution strategy of pepsico ppt
Distribution strategy of pepsico pptDistribution strategy of pepsico ppt
Distribution strategy of pepsico pptAkash Rana
 
Coca-cola Company track the customers demand and design the product.
 Coca-cola Company track the customers demand and design the product. Coca-cola Company track the customers demand and design the product.
Coca-cola Company track the customers demand and design the product.badhon11-2104
 
Presentation on pepsi co
Presentation on pepsi coPresentation on pepsi co
Presentation on pepsi coSoomro Danish
 
Project report scm pepsi co
Project report scm pepsi coProject report scm pepsi co
Project report scm pepsi coHITESH BHARTI
 
Pepsi case study
Pepsi case studyPepsi case study
Pepsi case studySali1110
 
Mcdonald’s-Case Study
Mcdonald’s-Case StudyMcdonald’s-Case Study
Mcdonald’s-Case StudyJay Shah
 
Entry Of Pepsi In India
Entry Of Pepsi In IndiaEntry Of Pepsi In India
Entry Of Pepsi In Indiamailrenuka
 
Pepsi entering to india
Pepsi entering to indiaPepsi entering to india
Pepsi entering to indiachintan878
 
A project report on how to increase sale of pepsico
A project report on how to increase sale of pepsicoA project report on how to increase sale of pepsico
A project report on how to increase sale of pepsicoProjects Kart
 
Research Paper on PepsiCo's Future Challenges
Research Paper on PepsiCo's Future ChallengesResearch Paper on PepsiCo's Future Challenges
Research Paper on PepsiCo's Future ChallengesBharat Bhushan
 
Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc
Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc
Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc PaulaFabi
 

Tendances (20)

Pepsi Presentation
Pepsi PresentationPepsi Presentation
Pepsi Presentation
 
Pepsico ppt
Pepsico pptPepsico ppt
Pepsico ppt
 
Pepsi ppt
Pepsi pptPepsi ppt
Pepsi ppt
 
Distribution strategy of pepsico ppt
Distribution strategy of pepsico pptDistribution strategy of pepsico ppt
Distribution strategy of pepsico ppt
 
Nike Cost of Capital
Nike Cost of Capital Nike Cost of Capital
Nike Cost of Capital
 
Coca-cola Company track the customers demand and design the product.
 Coca-cola Company track the customers demand and design the product. Coca-cola Company track the customers demand and design the product.
Coca-cola Company track the customers demand and design the product.
 
Domino's
Domino'sDomino's
Domino's
 
Presentation on pepsi co
Presentation on pepsi coPresentation on pepsi co
Presentation on pepsi co
 
Project report scm pepsi co
Project report scm pepsi coProject report scm pepsi co
Project report scm pepsi co
 
PPT SIP Report Balaji
PPT SIP Report BalajiPPT SIP Report Balaji
PPT SIP Report Balaji
 
ppt on pepsico
ppt on pepsico ppt on pepsico
ppt on pepsico
 
Pepsi case study
Pepsi case studyPepsi case study
Pepsi case study
 
Jubilant FoodWorks
Jubilant FoodWorksJubilant FoodWorks
Jubilant FoodWorks
 
Mcdonald’s-Case Study
Mcdonald’s-Case StudyMcdonald’s-Case Study
Mcdonald’s-Case Study
 
Entry Of Pepsi In India
Entry Of Pepsi In IndiaEntry Of Pepsi In India
Entry Of Pepsi In India
 
Pepsi entering to india
Pepsi entering to indiaPepsi entering to india
Pepsi entering to india
 
A project report on how to increase sale of pepsico
A project report on how to increase sale of pepsicoA project report on how to increase sale of pepsico
A project report on how to increase sale of pepsico
 
Research Paper on PepsiCo's Future Challenges
Research Paper on PepsiCo's Future ChallengesResearch Paper on PepsiCo's Future Challenges
Research Paper on PepsiCo's Future Challenges
 
Pepsi Marketing Mix
Pepsi Marketing MixPepsi Marketing Mix
Pepsi Marketing Mix
 
Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc
Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc
Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc
 

Similaire à Pepsi entry into india

Presentation Of Pepsi Case1
Presentation Of Pepsi Case1Presentation Of Pepsi Case1
Presentation Of Pepsi Case1azooba
 
Inernatonal marketing
Inernatonal marketingInernatonal marketing
Inernatonal marketingMuskan Pahwa
 
Pepsi’S Entry Into India
Pepsi’S Entry Into IndiaPepsi’S Entry Into India
Pepsi’S Entry Into Indiaagarwalpuneet11
 
International Marketing Case Study
International Marketing Case StudyInternational Marketing Case Study
International Marketing Case StudyLawrence Cenotto
 
Assignment details pepsi co and coke american beverage giants
Assignment details pepsi co and coke american beverage giants Assignment details pepsi co and coke american beverage giants
Assignment details pepsi co and coke american beverage giants sodhi3
 
Case study on pepsi
Case study on pepsiCase study on pepsi
Case study on pepsisagarsingh62
 
Case study pepsi
Case study pepsiCase study pepsi
Case study pepsiDhruv Goel
 
pepsi killing softly
pepsi killing softlypepsi killing softly
pepsi killing softly19851984
 
119631 633643659250049895
119631 633643659250049895119631 633643659250049895
119631 633643659250049895Prabu Ilavarasu
 
Food and beverage industry in india
Food and beverage industry in indiaFood and beverage industry in india
Food and beverage industry in indiaSukanya Dhar
 
Prince new report copy
Prince new report   copyPrince new report   copy
Prince new report copyPRINSHU SINGH
 
Pepsi A Case Study
Pepsi   A Case StudyPepsi   A Case Study
Pepsi A Case Studyvivek_jain
 
Pepsi co insight india
Pepsi co insight indiaPepsi co insight india
Pepsi co insight indiaAditya Jaitly
 
Pepsi CO in India
Pepsi CO in IndiaPepsi CO in India
Pepsi CO in Indiatamizhselvi
 
ANALYSING THE E&D PROGRAM BRAND PEPSI & ROLLING OUT THE AUDIT FRAMEWORK
ANALYSING THE E&D PROGRAM BRAND PEPSI & ROLLING OUT THE AUDIT FRAMEWORKANALYSING THE E&D PROGRAM BRAND PEPSI & ROLLING OUT THE AUDIT FRAMEWORK
ANALYSING THE E&D PROGRAM BRAND PEPSI & ROLLING OUT THE AUDIT FRAMEWORKArjun Bhalla
 
30361432 ajeet-kumar-presentation-on-pepsi
30361432 ajeet-kumar-presentation-on-pepsi30361432 ajeet-kumar-presentation-on-pepsi
30361432 ajeet-kumar-presentation-on-pepsiSandeep Dvs
 

Similaire à Pepsi entry into india (20)

Presentation Of Pepsi Case1
Presentation Of Pepsi Case1Presentation Of Pepsi Case1
Presentation Of Pepsi Case1
 
Inernatonal marketing
Inernatonal marketingInernatonal marketing
Inernatonal marketing
 
Pepsi's entry into India
Pepsi's entry into IndiaPepsi's entry into India
Pepsi's entry into India
 
Pepsi’S Entry Into India
Pepsi’S Entry Into IndiaPepsi’S Entry Into India
Pepsi’S Entry Into India
 
Pepsi's entry
Pepsi's entryPepsi's entry
Pepsi's entry
 
Pepsico case study
Pepsico case studyPepsico case study
Pepsico case study
 
International Marketing Case Study
International Marketing Case StudyInternational Marketing Case Study
International Marketing Case Study
 
Assignment details pepsi co and coke american beverage giants
Assignment details pepsi co and coke american beverage giants Assignment details pepsi co and coke american beverage giants
Assignment details pepsi co and coke american beverage giants
 
Case study on pepsi
Case study on pepsiCase study on pepsi
Case study on pepsi
 
Case study pepsi
Case study pepsiCase study pepsi
Case study pepsi
 
pepsi killing softly
pepsi killing softlypepsi killing softly
pepsi killing softly
 
119631 633643659250049895
119631 633643659250049895119631 633643659250049895
119631 633643659250049895
 
Pepsico case study
Pepsico case studyPepsico case study
Pepsico case study
 
Food and beverage industry in india
Food and beverage industry in indiaFood and beverage industry in india
Food and beverage industry in india
 
Prince new report copy
Prince new report   copyPrince new report   copy
Prince new report copy
 
Pepsi A Case Study
Pepsi   A Case StudyPepsi   A Case Study
Pepsi A Case Study
 
Pepsi co insight india
Pepsi co insight indiaPepsi co insight india
Pepsi co insight india
 
Pepsi CO in India
Pepsi CO in IndiaPepsi CO in India
Pepsi CO in India
 
ANALYSING THE E&D PROGRAM BRAND PEPSI & ROLLING OUT THE AUDIT FRAMEWORK
ANALYSING THE E&D PROGRAM BRAND PEPSI & ROLLING OUT THE AUDIT FRAMEWORKANALYSING THE E&D PROGRAM BRAND PEPSI & ROLLING OUT THE AUDIT FRAMEWORK
ANALYSING THE E&D PROGRAM BRAND PEPSI & ROLLING OUT THE AUDIT FRAMEWORK
 
30361432 ajeet-kumar-presentation-on-pepsi
30361432 ajeet-kumar-presentation-on-pepsi30361432 ajeet-kumar-presentation-on-pepsi
30361432 ajeet-kumar-presentation-on-pepsi
 

Pepsi entry into india

  • 1. Entr y into INDIA ……… A lesson in GLOBALIZATION.
  • 2. AN ABSTRACT It took half decade of negotiating, 20 debates in Parliament and a monumental public relations campaign for Pepsi to enter India. Not exactly Pepsi-Cola, it was called Lehar Pepsi, a concession to the anti-foreign lobby. It appear only in Jaipur, Kanpur, Bangalore and Punjab. Christopher Sinclair, the President of Pepsi-Cola International, called his company’s venture in India “An Historic Agreement.” PepsiCo’s move into the Indian market was made possible by the company’s willingness to take a 36.9% share in a conglomerate called “Pepsi Foods Private Limited” It’s a co-owners were Punjab Agro Industries and Voltas a subsidiar y of TATA Group.
  • 3. AN ABSTRACT PepsiCo agreed to set up fruit and vegetable processing plants, agriculture research stations, franchised bottling operations and snack-food factories using local potatoes and other ingredients. It is also planned to invest more than $1Billion in India by 1998. First plants were built in nor thern Punjab State Pepsi Food Private Ltd had planned to call his flagship drink “Pepsi Era” but opponents challenge a name under a law. Lehar Pepsi,7-Up and Miranda got an unexpected assist when Government decide in April 1989, to begin an enforcing a two year ban on the use of brominated use of vegetable oil.
  • 4. "Convincing India that it needs Western junk has not been easy." - A New Internationalist Magazine Article, commenting on Pepsi's struggle to enter India, in August 1988
  • 5. A Letter to PEPSI  In 1988, the New York office of the  President of the multi­billion cola  company PepsiCo received a letter from  India.  The company had been trying for some  time to enter the Indian market ­ without  much success.  The letter was written by George  Fernandes (Fernandes), The General  Secretary of one of the country's leading  political parties, Janata Dal.
  • 6. A Letter to PEPSI "I learned that you are coming  here. I am the one that threw  Coca­Cola out, and we are soon  going to come back into the  government. If you come into  the country, you have to  remember that the same fate  awaits you as Coca­Cola." George Fernandes  The General Secretary – Janta Dal
  • 7. PEPSI’S ENTRY INTO INDIA Before  Before this Coca-cola had been thrown out of India in1977.  Even in 1980’s economy was marked by high government inter ventions.  Pepsi though, was looking India for couple of reasons,  The US market seems to be reaching its saturation level.  India was always a market that ever y MNC wanted to enter . . ( reason ver y vast population).  Urbanization familiarized Indians with global brands.  Low per capita consumption of sof t drink, 3 bottles p.a. as compared to 63 for Egypt, 38 for Thailand and 13 for Pakistan.
  • 8. THE PROMISES - PEPSI’S ENTER  May 1985, PepsiCo had joined hands with the R P Goenka (RPG) group, to begin operations in the nor th Indian state of Punjab.  Agro Product Expor t Ltd., planned to impor t the cola concentrate and sell sof t drinks under the Pepsi label.  Make its proposal attractive to the Indian government  Objectives -revolved around 'promoting and developing the expor t of Indian agro-based products  The government rejected this proposal primarily on two grounds: 1. Did not accept the clause regarding the impor t 2. Use of a foreign brand name (Pepsi) was not allowed  RPG group too ended at this juncture
  • 9. THE PROMISES - PEPSI’S ENTER  Decision to link its entr y with the development and welfare of the state of Punjab.  Fact that Punjab boasted a healthy agricultural sector  Entr y on agriculture and employment  New employment oppor tunities would tempt many of the terrorists to return to society...  Focus on food & agro-processing only 25% investment for Sof t drink Bring advanced food processing technology & Boost image of Made in India to Foreign Market  The Ex-Im ration 5:1 for 10 years  80% Expor t of Company & 20% Expor t of Selected Manufacturer  50K Jobs in India & 25K in Punjab, No Foreign Brand Names used & Agriculture Research Center
  • 10. PEPSI ENTERED  Govt. Quite impressed with T&C Proposed  In 1988 Finally Cleared by the Govt.  JV – PAIC (Punjab Agro Ind. Corp.) & Voltas India Ltd. (TATA)  JV Stake PEPSI – 36.89, Voltas – 36.11% & PAIC – 24%  In 1989 Launched the Soft Drinks with Great Fanfare & Multi-Media advertising Campaing
  • 11. PEPSI ENTERED JV – Stakes - 1988 24 36.89 PEPSI Voltas PAIC 36.11
  • 12. Marketing Expert – PHILIP KOTLER  Some year later Commenting, how the company used Mega Marketing to enter the Indian Market  Pepsi bundled a set of benifits that won the support of various interest groups in India.  Instead of relying on the normal four P's added two P's – Politics & Public Opinion  Committing towards developing Rural economy & Bringing Technologies for Food Processing & water treatment  Turned a lot of Votes in Pepsi Co's favor.
  • 14. Promises Keep Some, Break Some!  Pepsi began by setting up a fruit and vegetable processing plant at Zahura village in Punjab's Hoshiarpur district.  Focus on processing tomatoes to make tomato paste  Local varieties of tomatoes were found to be of inferior quality  Imported the required material for tomato cultivation.  Agreements with a few big farmers  The agro-climatic profile of Punjab was not exactly suitable for a crop like tomato  Chosen the state because farmers were progressive, landholdings were on the larger side, & water availability was sufficient  Experts from the US had to interact extensively with the farmers
  • 15. PROMISES ARE MEANT TO BE BROKEN  On payments by cheque, found out that 80% of the farmers did not even have a bank account..!  Croped Harvested 1990, Plant not been made operational Farmer had to bear losses of 2.5 Millions  Pepsi paid Rs. 0.75/Kg & Market Price was Rs. 2.00/Kg  Fails to Creat Jobs, Promised for 50000 Jobs but by 1991 - 783 Employed, 1992 – 909, & By 1996 – 2400 people as Direct Employees. Pepsi Claimed Employed 26000 as Indirect Employment  Industry Commeted company included the small vendors who sold soft drinks as indirect employees. It could not be regarded as the employees of Pepsi  Information revealed that more than 50% employees working in its bottling business and not for food processing activities.
  • 16. Promises Keep Some, Break Some!  It also had major holding in Futura Polymers Ltd. Recyling plastic – a capital intensive firm.  The use of name “Lehar Pepsi” also attracted much contraversey.  Pepsi also failed to adhere its commitment to export 50% of its production.  It began exporting tea, rice, shrimps, glass bottles, leather products, champagne as against fruit or vegetable based products has always been exported.  There was even a show cause notice to Pepsi company by Ministry of Commerce, to which company paid no attention.  Luckily for Pepsi, it did not have to face criticism for long
  • 17. India Liberalizes - A Boon For Pepsi  In the early 1990s, the Government of India was facing a foreign exchange crisis.  Organizations like the International Monetary Fund agreed to help the government.  Condition that it liberalized the Indian economy.  The Process included:removal of numerous restriction on foreign trade and increased the role of Private Equity in Indian market.  Pepsi benefited from the economic changes in many ways.  The Company took full Adavantage of New Economic Policy
  • 18. India Liberalizes - A Boon For Pepsi  Bought off its partners in Joint Venture. A Wholly- Owned subsidairy.  PepsiCo Holdings India Pvt. Ltd. (PHI) – Devoted Soft Drinks Business. Changed Cola Name from Lehar Pepsi to Pepsi.  Decision to sell off its Tomato Paste Plant to the Indian FMCG major, Hindustan Lever Ltd. (HLL).  1995 – Beverages business grew by as much as 50%  1996 – PHI – Pepsi's turnover by Rs. 1.25 Billion, 1.5% Fruit & Vegetable Exports & 67% Plastic Exports  1997 – The Agro Research Center promised by the Company was nowhere in sight.
  • 19. Pepsi Goes Farming - Finally  Though Pepsi attracted a lot of criticism, many people felt there was a positive side to the company's entry into India.  Pepsi’s tomato farming project shot up India’s tomato production from 4.25mn tonnes in ’91-92 to 5.44mn tonnes in ’95-96.  Punjab’s overall tomato productivity went up from 28,000 tonnes to 250,000 tonnes and per hectare from 16 tonnes to 50 tonnes.  The company offer its contract farmers, free of cost, some advanced equipments such as transplanters and seedling machines.  It also set up agriculture research centers in Jallowal and Chano (Punjab) and Nelamangala(Karnataka).  Though “Pepsi Agri Backward Integration Programme” the company encouraged Punjab farmers to cultivate potatoes with low sugar content.
  • 20. AFTER ALL PEPSI WASN’T THAT BAD PEPSI’S ENTRY-INDIAN BENEFITS  It extended it contracts farming initiatives to groundnuts in the year 2000.  The project initiated in Punjab and then in Gujarat.  By using improved technology from China, the per hectare yield improve from 1tonne to 3.5- 4.5tonnes.  Pepsi invested additional Rs.3.75bn in spread over 3 years (2000-2002) in Karnataka over and above the existing investment of Rs.1.4bn  Since its entry to India company already invested Rs.18bn by the year 2000.  8000 people were working for the Company
  • 21. DOING BUSINESS ON ITS OWN TERMS……..  In 2000 Pepsi’s export added up to Rs. 3bn.  It included processed foods, basmati rice, guar gums and even soft drink concentrate.  Even by 2000 it could procure only 3,000 tonnes of potatoes p.a. as against its requirement of 25,000 tonnes.  In 2002, company entered into various contract farming deals.  It joined hands with Punjab Agri Export Corporation to process citrus fruits for its Tropicana project in August 2002.  The company also initiated, first of its kind, organized and commercial seaweed farming in Tamilnadu.  By 2003, Pepsi’s soft drinks, snacks, fruit juices and mineral water business had established themselves firmly in India.
  • 22. Questions . . ? 1. Why do Companies like Pepsi need to Globalize? What are the various ways in which Foreign Companies can enter a Foreign Market? What hurdels and problems did Pepsi face when it tried to enter India during the 1980s?
  • 23. Companies like Pepsi  Need to be global for the Following * Expand Sales- Increase the market for their production by tapping potential new countries * Minimize Risks- Globalization and International trade also helps in minimizing risks. * To leverage on technology * To increase production efficiencies * For diversification so as to reduce risks * To counter foreign investments by competitors * Minimize Costs and optimal resource utilization- By shifting operations in areas with cheaper labour and resources.
  • 24. Companies can enter foreign markets  through the following ways: * Export – Direct & Indirect * JV - Joint Ventures * Mergers and Acquisitions * Licensing, Franchising * Strategic Alliances * Management Contracts * Contract Manufacturing * FDI – Foreign Direct Investments
  • 25. Hurdles faced by Pepsi * India being a closed economy till 1991, there was high level of intervention by the government in the corporate sector * Low awareness, demand and consumption for soft drinks. The per capita consumption was only 3 per annum * Foreign brand name could not be used * There was no liberalization and this not even 1% FDI was allowed. * Sensitive political and social problems in the country like terrorism * Cola concentrate – the major ingredient to make Pepsi soft drink could not be imported * Agriculture sector was the priority and thus Pepsi had to win the government by making promises of development in the agriculture sector
  • 26. Questions . . ? 2. Critically analyze the strategy adopted by Pepsi to sell itself to the Indian Government. Do you think the biggest Factor Responsible for the acceptance of its proposal by the Regulatory Authorities was its Projection of its Operations as the solution to many of Punjab's Problems? Why/Why Not?
  • 27. Strategy Adopted by Pespi  Promoting and developing the export of Indian Agro-based products, though it got rejected.  Each cola import would be in return of exporting juice concentrate from Punjab.  Development and Welfare of State.  Bringing about Agriculture Revolution in state.  Creating Employments.  Terrorists to return to society.  Punjab boasted a healthy agricultural sector
  • 28. Strategy Adopted by Pespi  Development of Areas it planned to operate in  Directing major (75%) investment towards agricultural sector  Focusing on food and Agro-processing.  Boosting the image of Indian products in foreign market.  Establishing Agricultural Research Centre.  More emphasis on Exports than imports to improvise the balance of payment.
  • 29. Reson for Acceptance of Proposal By the Regulatory Authorities   Yes, Most of the commitments were related with Punjab therefore it is the biggest factor responsible for acceptance of Pepsi.
  • 30. Questions . . ? 3. How did the Company react to the changes in the Business Environment after the Liberalization of the Indian Economy in the early 1990s? Critically comment on the allegation that Pepsi deliberatly did not adhere to most of its commitments.
  • 31. After Liberalization   In 1994, it bought off its partner in venture i.e. Voltas and PAIC.  Establishing wholly owned subsidiary PepsiCo Holding India Pvt. Ltd.  Changed name from “Lehar Pepsi” to “Pepsi”  Sold off its Tomato Paste Plant in 1995  Gradually reduce the contract farming  Plastic Exports were 67%.  Till 1997, the agro research centre was no where.
  • 32. Allegation   Failing to create jobs  50% of employee working for Concentrate and Bottling Business not for Food processing Business.  Pepsi with Futura Polymers Ltd. were reducing the workforce and more machine oriented  More lasting impression of “Pepsi” and “Lehar Pepsi”.  Export of fruit & vegetable based products was negligible & started exporting Tea, Rice & Shrimps  Failed its commitment to export 50% production.  Products exported were same which use to happen earlier.
  • 33. Questions . . ? 4. Examine the Contract Farming initiatives undertaken by Pepsi in India and Explain the rationale for such initiative from the Company's Perspective. Why is it important for Multinational Corporations to Work towards the Improvement of the Economy of the Countries in which they Operate? What are the other various ways in which this can be done?
  • 34. Contract Farming Initiative  Increase in Tomato crop production  Providing High yield seeds to increase the productivity in the tomato cultivation  Offered advanced equipments (Free of cost) to increase the speed & efficiency  Imported the required material for tomato cultivation
  • 35. Rationale for Contract Farming  Rationale behind the contract farming was that in one or the other way company insisted on the development of those crops which were directly or indirectly related to their businesses such as soft drinks, snacks, fruit juices & mineral water.  Other rationale behind the contract farming was to increase their own business rather than any social welfare.
  • 36. Rationale for Contract Farming Taken initiative for  Chilly farming  Groundnuts production over paddy production  Rice production  Fruits & Vegetable Farming Encouraging farmers to cultivate potato with low sugar content for chips.
  • 37. Case Study - References  Case written by A. Mukund. ICFAI Center for Management Research.  Slideshare.net – agarwalpuneet11 Slides  Project Reference: IIM Calcutta.  Times Of India  Washington Post.
  • 38. Thank You ITM Malad SMBA - 18
  • 39. Presented By Group No. 04 Prassanna Ghorpade Jay Sanghrajka Pooja Dave Vishal Sawant Mehul Shah Nidhi Sheth Shubhangi Panchal
  • 40. MCE - Multinational Corporate Environment Case Study Submited to Prof. Abdul On 16/12/2012 At ITM Malad – SMBA – 18