1. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006
Capital structure
Issues:
What is capital structure?
Why is it important?
What are the sources of capital available to a company?
What is business risk and financial risk?
What are the relative costs of debt and equity?
What are the main theories of capital structure?
Is there an optimal capital structure?
2. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006
What is “Capital Structure”?
Definition
The capital structure of a firm is the mix of
different securities issued by the firm to
finance its operations.
Securities
Bonds, bank loans
Ordinary shares (common stock), Preference
shares (preferred stock)
Hybrids, eg warrants, convertible bonds
3. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006
Financial
Structure
What is “Capital Structure”?
Balance Sheet
Current Current
Assets Liabilities
Debt
Fixed Preference
Assets shares
Ordinary
shares
4. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006
Capital
Structure
What is “Capital Structure”?
Balance Sheet
Current Current
Assets Liabilities
Debt
Fixed Preference
Assets shares
Ordinary
shares
5. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006
Sources of capital
Ordinary shares (common stock)
Preference shares (preferred stock)
Hybrid securities
Warrants
Convertible bonds
Loan capital
Bank loans
Corporate bonds
6. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006
Ordinary shares (common stock)
Risk finance
Dividends are only paid if profits are made
and only after other claimants have been paid
e.g. lenders and preference shareholders
A high rate of return is required
Provide voting rights – the power to hire and
fire directors
No tax benefit, unlike borrowing
7. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006
Preference shares (preferred stock)
Lower risk than ordinary shares – and a lower
dividend
Fixed dividend - payment before ordinary
shareholders and in a liquidation situation
No voting rights - unless dividend payments are
in arrears
Cumulative - dividends accrue in the event that
the issuer does not make timely dividend
payments
Participating - an extra dividend is possible
Redeemable - company may buy back at a fixed
future date
8. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006
Loan capital
Financial instruments that pay a certain
rate of interest until the maturity date
of the loan and then return the principal
(capital sum borrowed)
Bank loans or corporate bonds
Interest on debt is allowed against tax
9. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006
Seniority of debt
Seniority indicates preference in position
over other lenders.
Some debt is subordinated.
In the event of default, holders of
subordinated debt must give preference
to other specified creditors who are paid
first.
10. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
Security
Security is a form of attachment to the
borrowing firm’s assets.
It provides that the assets can be sold in
event of default to satisfy the debt for
which the security is given.
11. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
Indenture
A written agreement between the
corporate debt issuer and the lender.
Sets forth the terms of the loan:
Maturity
Interest rate
Protective covenants
e.g. financial reports, restriction on further
loan issues, restriction on disposal of assets
and level of dividends
12. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
Warrants
A warrant is a certificate entitling the holder
to buy a specific amount of shares at a specific
price (the exercise price) for a given period.
If the price of the share rises above the
warrant's exercise price, then the investor can
buy the security at the warrant's exercise
price and resell it for a profit.
Otherwise, the warrant will simply expire or
remain unused.
13. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
Convertible bonds
A convertible bond is a bond that gives the
holder the right to "convert" or exchange the
par amount of the bond for ordinary shares of
the issuer at some fixed ratio during a
particular period.
As bonds, they provide a coupon payment and
are legally debt securities, which rank prior to
equity securities in a default situation.
Their value, like all bonds, depends on the level
of prevailing interest rates and the credit
quality of the issuer.
Their conversion feature also gives them
features of equity securities.
14. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
The Cost of Capital
Expected Return
Risk premium
Risk-free rate
Time value of money
________________________________________________________
______
Risk
Treasury Corporate Preference Hybrid
Bonds Bonds Shares Securities
Ordinary
Shares
15. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
Measuring capital structure
Debt/(Debt + Market Value of Equity)
Debt/Total Book Value of Assets
Interest coverage: EBITDA/Interest
16. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
Selected leverage data for
US corporations
Company Debt/Debt
+MVE
Debt/Book
Assets
EBITDA /
Interest
Delta Air 53% 32% 1.1
Disney 9 20 14.1
GM 61 37 3.0
HP 13 17 21.7
McDon's 15 31 7.2
Safeway 55 53 3.1
17. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
Interpreting capital structures
The capital structures we observe are
determined both by deliberate choices and by
chance events
Safeway’s high leverage came from an LBO
HP’s low leverage is the HP way
Disney’s low leverage reflects past good
performance
GM’s high leverage reflects the opposite
18. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
Capital structures can be changed
Leverage is reduced by
Cutting dividends or issuing stock
Reducing costs, especially fixed costs
Leverage increased by
Stock repurchases, special dividends, generous wages
Using debt rather than retained earnings
Interpreting capital structures
19. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 11
Business risk and Financial risk
Firms have business risk generated by
what they do
But firms adopt additional financial risk
when they finance with debt
20. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
Risk and the Income Statement
Sales
Operating – Variable costs
Leverage – Fixed costs
EBIT
– Interest expense
Financial Earnings before taxes
Leverage – Taxes
Net Income
EPS = Net Income
No. of Shares
21. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
Business Risk
The basic risk inherent in the operations
of a firm is called business risk
Business risk can be viewed as the
variability of a firm’s Earnings Before
Interest and Taxes (EBIT)
22. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
Financial Risk
Debt causes financial risk because it
imposes a fixed cost in the form of
interest payments.
The use of debt financing is referred to
as financial leverage.
Financial leverage increases risk by
increasing the variability of a firm’s
return on equity or the variability of its
earnings per share.
23. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
Financial Risk vs. Business Risk
There is a trade-off between financial risk and
business risk.
A firm with high financial risk is using a fixed
cost source of financing. This increases the
level of EBIT a firm needs just to break even.
A firm will generally try to avoid financial risk
- a high level of EBIT to break even - if its
EBIT is very uncertain (due to high business
risk).
24. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
Why should we care about
capital structure?
By altering capital structure firms have
the opportunity to change their cost of
capital and – therefore – the market value
of the firm
25. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
What is an optimal capital structure?
An optimal capital structure is one that
minimizes the firm’s cost of capital and
thus maximizes firm value
Cost of Capital:
Each source of financing has a different cost
The WACC is the “Weighted Average Cost of
Capital”
Capital structure affects the WACC
26. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
Capital Structure Theory
Basic question
Is it possible for firms to create value by
altering their capital structure?
Major theories
Modigliani and Miller theory
Trade-off Theory
Signaling Theory
27. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
Modigliani and Miller (MM)
Basic theory: Modigliani and
Miller (MM) in 1958 and 1963
Old - so why do we still study
them?
Before MM, no way to analyze
debt financing
First to study capital structure
and WACC together
Won the Nobel prize in 1990
28. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
Modigliani and Miller (MM)
Most influential papers ever published
in finance
Very restrictive assumptions
First “no arbitrage” proof in finance
Basis for other theories
29. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 22
Debt versus Equity
A firm’s cost of debt is always less than its
cost of equity
debt has seniority over equity
debt has a fixed return
the interest paid on debt is tax-deductible.
It may appear a firm should use as much debt
and as little equity as possible due to the
cost difference, but this ignores the
potential problems associated with debt.
A Basic Capital Structure Theory
30. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 33
A Basic Capital Structure Theory
There is a trade-off between the
benefits of using debt and the costs of
using debt.
The use of debt creates a tax shield benefit
from the interest on debt.
The costs of using debt, besides the obvious
interest cost, are the additional financial
distress costs and agency costs arising from
the use of debt financing.
31. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 33
Summary
A firm’s capital structure is the proportion of a
firm’s long-term funding provided by long-term debt
and equity.
Capital structure influences a firm’s cost of capital
through the tax advantage to debt financing and the
effect of capital structure on firm risk.
Because of the tradeoff between the tax advantage
to debt financing and risk, each firm has an optimal
capital structure that minimizes the WACC and
maximises firm value.
32. Kevin Campbell, University of Stirling, October 2006 33
Is there magic in financial leverage?
… can a company increase its value
simply by altering its capital structure?
…yes and no
…we will see….
Notes de l'éditeur
<number>
The exchange feature of a convertible bond gives the right for the holder to convert the par amount of the bond for common shares a specified price or "conversion ratio". For example, a conversion ratio might give the holder the right to convert $100 par amount of the convertible bonds of Ensolvint Corporation into its common shares at $25 per share. This conversion ratio would be said to be " 4:1" or "four to one".
The share price affects the value of a convertible substantially. Taking our example, if the shares of the Ensolvint were trading at $10, and the convertible was at a market price of $100, there would be no economic reason for an investor to convert the convertible bonds. For $100 par amount of the bond the investor would only get 4 shares of Ensolvint with a market value of $40. You might ask why the convertible was trading at $100 in this case. The answer would be that the yield of the bond justified this price. If the normal bonds of Ensolvint were trading at 10% yields and the yield of the convertible was 10%, bond investors would buy the bond and keep it at $100. A convertible bond with an "exercise price" far higher than the market price of the stock is called a "busted convertible" and generally trades at its bond value, although the yield is usually a little higher due to its lower or "subordinate" credit status.
Think of the opposite. When the share price attached to the bond is sufficiently high or "in the money", the convertible begins to trade more like an equity. If the exercise price is much lower than the market price of the common shares, the holder of the convertible can convert into the stock attractively. If the exercise price is $25 and the stock is trading at $50, the holder can get 4 shares for $100 par amount that have a market value of $200. This would force the price of the convertible above the bond value and its market price should be above $200 since it would have a higher yield than the common shares.
Issuers sell convertible bonds to provide a higher current yield to investors and equity capital upon conversion. Investors buy convertible bonds to gain a higher current yield and less downside, since the convertible should trade to it bond value in the case of a steep drop in the common share price.
Investors traditionally use "breakeven" analysis to compare the coupon payment of the convertible to the dividend yield of the common shares. Modern techniques of option analysis examine the convertible as a bond with an equity option attached and value it in this manner.
From Grinblatt and Titman
Signaling theory is based on asymettric information and gives rise to a pecking order.