2. SmartOrg software and services helps companies find
the most profitable projects
Life science
2
(c) 2000-2013 SmartOrg, Inc.
Aerospace
Technology
@SmartOrgInc
Other
10. Delivering A Billion Dollars
– Lessons In
Portfolio Evaluation
Global Leader
Dow AgroSciences
11. To Succeed We Must Be Better
Than Competitors
DAS Is Being Outspent In R&D
Low Project Success
% Of Value Promise
R&D As % Of Sales
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
100
Sales
Margin
50
0
ay
on er
sa
Sy nto
ng
en
ta
B
A
SF
D
O
D W
uP
on
t
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Performance Comparison Of Projects*
Actual Vs. Forecast (pre-2000)
M
B
R&D Spend ($ Bil)
Competitive comparison of R&D spending in 2000
Source: Phillips McDougal May - 2000
Source: Internal Study
12. Our Results Show Our
Performance To Be Better
DAS #3 In New
Ag Chem Product Introductions
Improved Project Success
45
Performance Comparison Of Projects*
Actual Vs. Forecast
40
100
% Of Value Promise
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
Sales
Margin
50
0
Pre-CPS
Post-CPS
0
Ba
ye
r
BA
SF
DO
Sy
W
ng
en
t
Du a
Po
M
nt
on
sa
nt
o*
New Ag Chem Introductions
Competitive comparison 1990-2007
Source: Cropnosis
* Does not include Biotech introductions
Source: Internal Study
13. Process And Tools Support
A Complex Global Portfolio –
1500 Concepts And 150 Projects
Our Portfolio
Over a hundred
active ingredients
and biological
traits for …
That work
differently in
dozens of
different
crops…
And are sold in
dozens of local
markets with
products formulated
to support specific
agricultural
practices.
Our Tools
Our Teams
Central executive
management overall
affordability, targets, and
project priority.
Global project leaders
prioritize concepts
and manage the
overall project value
and risk.
Local teams assess
commercial value and
uncertainty of a specific
concept.
Technical
Market
Technical
Market
14. Our Portfolio Process Is Built On
Best Practice Decision &
Risk Analysis Tools
Issues &
Assumptions
Identifying key project
Uncertainties and their
Impact (Value Drivers)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Probability
Distribution
Valuing Projects and
Characterizing alternatives
Less Emphasized
Project Risk
Assessment
Sensitivity
Analysis
Technical
Expected
Future Value
H
Market
Mean
L
Decision
Analysis
Investment
Intensity
Risk Reward
Bal. Portfolio