1. An a ly z ing the n e eds of c rea ting a SAP PI p la tf o rm in Sweden Department of Computer and Systems Sciences , Stockholm University & Royal Institute of Technology Alper Celik

5. Unbundling and Future Nordic Energy Market ” Unbundling” : Seperation of sales and distribution data ” Nordic Energy Market Consolidation” : They will need more integration

6. Pro blem Background MS BizTalk Vs SAP PI

9. Method

13. Why an integration platform? ( 3 )

14. Why an integration platform? (3)

16. Tools and Frameworks: Technology Adoption Life C ycle

19. Functi o nal Covarage Comparison SAP Microsoft MS Sharepoint NetWeaver Portal Portal Solution SOA on Basis of .NET and BizTalk Enterprise Service Oriented Architecture (eSOA) SOA Architecture paradigm MS .Net, Indigo Web Application Server Application Server MS BizTalk SAP PI Process Integration .Net and Microsoft Server Products NetWeaver Integration Platform

20. Introduction to SAP PI (XI)

21. Introduction to BizTalk

22. Market Share Comparison SAP PI MS BizTalk SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, SSA Global Technologies and so on 9 9 % SAP customers Biggest customer segment: 8500 2000 Total number of active users: 10 years 7 years Available in market for:

24. Pop-Up Q u iz What is the percentage of average ERP project b u d get spent on integration?

25. Pop-Up Q u iz 35-40 % of average ERP project budget is spent on integration (Gartner, AMR) Source: 'Cutting Implementation Costs by Application Integration', Gartner, February 2002

27. Analysis and Results

28. Analysis and Results

31. Analysis and Results A potential vendor lock-in situation with SAP The maturity of MS BizTalk An unclear roadmap of the development of SAP PI Insufficient human competence in SAP PI within and outside Vattenfall Results of Stakeholders Meetings and Analysis

34. 2- Product Roadmap (2) 1999 1992 1972 Year Heterogeneous business processes, lower TCO Scalable integrated business processes, lower TCO Real-time integrated business processes, lower TCO Customer Need mySAP.com, mySAP EP, SAP XI mySAP Technology (Internet architecture) SAP R/3, SAP APO, SAP BW R/3 Basis ( 3-tier Client/Server architecture ) R/1, R/2 ABAP (Mainframe architecture ) New Business Solution Enabling Technology 2003 Packaged composite business processes, lower TCO SAP xApps SAP NetWeaver (Enterprise Services Architecture)

36. 3- Maturity of BizTalk and SAP PI (1) Operational Excellence Product Leadership Customer Intimacy

37. 3- Maturity of BizTalk and SAP PI (2)

38. 3- Maturity of BizTalk and SAP PI (3)

39. 3- Maturity of BizTalk and SAP PI (4) SAP PI MS BizTalk SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, SSA Global Technologies and so on 9 9 % SAP customers Biggest customer segment: 8500 2000 Total number of active users: 10 years 7 years Available in market for:

40. 3- Maturity of BizTalk and SAP PI (5) 3 0 MS BizTalk SAP PI

43. SAP PI Best-Practices 1- midsize SAP clients : mySAP-centric organizations that hadn't selected a strategic integration platform tend to adopt XI as their primary integration platform. 2- large SAP clients : In the past, many of them selected an integration platform, but they're also aware that PI (XI) will be a necessary component of the SAP infrastructure for ESA. Therefore, they recognize that it's important to "understand" the product, so now they're introducing XI alongside their established integration platforms.

46. Marktplace (Internet) Business Partner SAP SAP SAP SAP Third- party Business Partner Final Decision Proposal (2) SAP PI BizTalk Other Systems Other Systems Firewall

51. With that... Thank you very much for your attention Alper Celik Alperc @kth.se