"Value Maximization and Risk Management Strategy in Biodiesel projects through Carbon Finance" presented by Snehashis, Climate Change & Environmental Core Competency Cell (C2-E-C3), IIFM in ASSOCHAM International Conference - "Climate Change: Business Sus
"Value Maximization and Risk Management Strategy in Biodiesel projects through Carbon Finance" presented by Snehashis, Climate Change & Environmental Core Competency Cell (C2-E-C3), IIFM in ASSOCHAM International Conference - "Climate Change: Business Sustainability & Society", Nov 11, 2008
Similaire à "Value Maximization and Risk Management Strategy in Biodiesel projects through Carbon Finance" presented by Snehashis, Climate Change & Environmental Core Competency Cell (C2-E-C3), IIFM in ASSOCHAM International Conference - "Climate Change: Business Sus
Best Practice Clean Finance and Investment in Energy Efficiency - Singgih W. ...OECD Environment
Similaire à "Value Maximization and Risk Management Strategy in Biodiesel projects through Carbon Finance" presented by Snehashis, Climate Change & Environmental Core Competency Cell (C2-E-C3), IIFM in ASSOCHAM International Conference - "Climate Change: Business Sus (20)
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
"Value Maximization and Risk Management Strategy in Biodiesel projects through Carbon Finance" presented by Snehashis, Climate Change & Environmental Core Competency Cell (C2-E-C3), IIFM in ASSOCHAM International Conference - "Climate Change: Business Sus
1. Value Maximization and Risk
Management Strategy in Biodiesel
projects through Carbon Finance
Snehashis Sarkar
Climate Change & Environmental Core Competency Cell
Indian Institute of Forest Management
snehashiss@gmail.com / cceccc.iifm@gmail.com
2. Context for Biodiesel
National Energy Security
Forex Savings
Livelihood generation for people
Improved social well-being
Oxygenated compound
No SOx emission
No CO and unburnt Hydrocarbon
Carbon Neutral fuel
Restoration of degraded land, check in soil erosion
and overall soil improvement
4. Risks
Risks to Farmers
Weather, Catastrophe, Seasonality
Little income in the first 4 -5 years
Non-performance of Energy Crop due to unknown
reasons
Risk of non-procurement by industry
5. Risks
Risks to Industry players
Highly variable results reported by different
agencies
Results are highly site-specific
Competition with the existing conventional fuel
Risk of Market failure
Risks to the end-user
Price risk
Technology failure
6. Risk Minimization Strategy
Farmers
Portfolio of Agri-produce with Energy crop
Pre-purchase Agreement
Minimum Support Price
Portfoltio of related diversified Activities
Intercropping
Controlled Grazing
Honey Bee rearing in the field
7. Risk Minimization Strategy
Industry
Crop Insurance for Energy Crops
Weather Insurance
Pre-purchase Agreement with the OMCs
Minimum Support Price
8. Value Maximization Approach
Generate revenue at every step of the value chain
Link a number of Supply Chain to existing value chain
Fruit pulp Juice of Simarouba
De-oiled Cake
Glycerol
Carbon Finance
9. CDM options
Value-chain based approach
(No stone left unturned)
Maximization of Carbon Credit benefits
Securitization of underlying project finance
Maximize revenue generation
Promote sustainable development
10. CDM options
Afforestation / Reforestation
Methane Recovery and subsequent co-generation
from the methane
Methane avoidance through composting
Fuel Switch
11. Approved Methodologies
Afforestation / Reforestation
1.AR-AM0002
“Restoration of degraded lands through
afforestation / reforestation”
2.AR-AM0005
“Afforestation and reforestation project activities
implemented for industrial and/or commercial
uses”
12. Approved Methodologies
3.AR-AM0006
“Afforestation / Reforestation with Trees supported
by Shrubs on Degraded Land”
4.AR-ACM0001
“Afforestation and reforestation of degraded
land”
13. Approved Methodologies
5.AR-AMS0002
“Simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies for
small-scale afforestation and reforestation project
activities under the CDM implemented on
settlements”
14. Approved Methodologies
Methane Recovery and co-generation from the
methane (AMS III.R and AMS I.C)
“Methane recovery in agricultural activities at
household/small farm level”
&
“Thermal energy for the user with or without
electricity”
15. Approved Methodologies
Methane Avoidance
AMS III.F
“Avoidance of methane production from decay of
biomass through composting”
16. Approved Methodologies
Fuel Switch
1.AM0047
“Production of biodiesel based on waste oils and/or
waste fats from biogenic origin for use as fuel”
17. Approved Methodologies
Fuel Switch
2. Draft revised AM0047 version 03
“Production of biodiesel based on waste oils and/or
waste fats from biogenic origin or from oil seeds
cultivated in dedicated plantations for use as fuel”
18. Methodologies on the progress table
Fuel Switch
SSC NM009 (Draft AMS-I.F)
“Substitution of fossil fuel in combustion engines
through biofuel from degraded land”
19. Strengths
Carbon Finance can get the biodiesel projects which
are often financially unviable, financed.
The farmers can be compensated for the limited or
no returns from plant produces during the first few
years by upfront payment of Carbon Credits.
Carbon credits as earned in hard currency, can attract
otherwise unwilling parties to finance the project.
Potential for multiple CDM projects as well as
harnessing multifarious developmental benefits from a
Value-chain based approach.
20. Weakness & Limitation
Use of some methodologies can restrict simultaneous
use of another or harnessing Carbon benefits from
multiple sources across the value chain at the same
time.
Because of high risk of the projects, the CER prices
discovered in the market may be very small.
CERs from A/R CDM are not tradable in the EU
market as per provisions of the linking directive.
21. Risk Matrix
R1. Feedstock yield/ Resource supply risk
R2. Technological risk
R3.Volumetric risk
R4. Biodiesel price risk
R5. Registration risk
R6. Risks in monitoring, verification and issuance of CERs
R7. Risks of additional policy of CDM EB
R8. Political risks in host country
R9. Risk of non-renewal of project land lease
R10. CER price risk
R11. Environment, Health and Safety risk
22. Participatory Risk Mapping
Risks are to be ranked by the CDM consultants, project
developers and financiers through collective
deliberation in order of their respective Risk Index,
which is the product of its
likelihood of materializing (L)
severity of impact (I)
This will help in prioritizing risks and adopt suitable
mitigation strategies for them.