SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  7
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
White Paper



                             PART 3 OF 3




Executing Effective M&A:
Critical Considerations from
Pre- to Post-Deal: Part III




   M E R R I L L   D A T A S I T E
Contents
                                                                                   PART 3 OF 3




      Executive Summary                                                                     3

      Due Diligence Post-Deal: Turning projections and “wishful thinking” into reality      4

      A Failure to Communicate: How a lack of information can derail integration            4

      Using Technology to Facilitate Post-Merger Integration: VDRs provide
      a common forum for secure communication                                               5

      Conclusion                                                                            6
Executing Effective M&A: Critical Considerations




                    Executive Summary
                                 Executive Summary

                                 M&A transactions that succeed in creating enhanced value always follow certain steps
                                 before, during and after the deal itself.

                                 In the previous instalment of Executing Effective M&A, we examined some of the best
                                 practices for due diligence during an M&A transaction.

                                 In this, the final instalment of our 3-part series, we examine industry best practices for
                                 maximising value and capturing synergies after the deal is done. Thinking innovatively
                                 and leveraging best-in-class technology to facilitate communication can enhance
                                 prospects for a successful post-merger integration of two entities, and the creation of
                                 lasting value post-transaction.

                                 Much has been written over the years about once-promising M&A deals that were
                                 initially greeted with breathless excitement by all parties involved, but which ultimately
                                 and definitively disappointed. (AOL/Time Warner seems to stand out as the poster child
                                 example of a “failure to thrive” in the post-merger world.)

                                 At its simplest, the maths behind mergers or acquisitions is straightforward: The
                                 participants believe they have found a way to make 1+1 equal 3, i.e. creating a final
                                 entity that is greater than the sum of its parts. The stated goal is always to target, select
                                 and then accomplish a deal that provides true, accretive value to the final entity,
                                 whether that value comes in the form of opening up a new market or geography,
                                 improving gross sales, streamlining costs, gaining access to technology or intellectual
                                 property, or some other more intangible benefit.

                                 To that end, during the due diligence process, deal teams on both sides of the table
                                 aggressively look for untapped opportunities and synergies that can be profitably
                                 exploited post-merger. Great care is taken during this phase of the deal to examine all
The reasons for the failure      the nuts and bolts of the potential partner’s customer list, assets, positioning in the
of M&A deals are myriad,         market, prospects, distribution chain and much more. Every contract is intently
but the underlying fact          examined for portents that might reveal the future fortunes of an asset, or any hidden
seems to be that the value       secrets. Inventory and other assets are counted and verified almost up to the moment
the deal teams thought           the final M&A documents are signed. Management claims are checked, double-checked
they saw during the due          and triple-checked, all in an effort to prove to the acquiring company that what it sees as
diligence process failed to      potential value is real—and that the value can be profitably capitalised upon once the
materialise once all parties     rice has been thrown and the new marriage begins.
had shaken hands and
                                 However, even with all that painstaking care, many, if not most, mergers “fail” in one
walked out of the room.
                                 way or another. Sales fall. New markets prove anaemic. Clashes occur between sales
                                 professionals and strategy becomes fragmented, or worse, non-existent.

                                 The reasons for the failure of M&A deals are myriad, but the underlying fact seems to be
                                 that the value the deal teams thought they saw during the due diligence process failed to
                                 materialise once all parties had shaken hands and walked out of the room. Now, instead
                                 of 1+1=3, the sum of the whole proves decidedly less than its parts.

                                 That’s why smart dealmakers realise that executing effective M&A extends far beyond
                                 the conference room, and that for a deal to be truly successful, a thoughtful, considered
                                 post-merger integration plan must be identified, communicated to all employees and
                                 then methodically implemented over a period of months or even years, with periodic
                                 updates designed to measure any value created and the synergies being realised.




                                                                                                                                 3
Due Diligence Post-Deal: Turning projections and “wishful thinking” into reality

                              It’s perhaps ironic that so much energy, time and effort is expended in M&A ventures
                              during pre-deal and due diligence phases, while relatively scant attention is paid to
                              continuing that level of observation during the post-deal time frame. In a sense, it’s as if
                              management and the deal teams feel that their job has concluded once the ink has dried
                              on the contract.

                              Nothing, of course, could be farther from the truth.

                              Let’s take a hypothetical example:

                              Imagine a large, well-established U.S. manufacturing company with a profitable, if
                              somewhat niche market has decided its core product line could ultimately be rendered
                              obsolete based on new technology that has been developed by a smaller company
                              located in China.

Post-deal, management at      While the smaller Chinese entity is underfunded, it has established a solid core business
the larger company realised   in an offshoot of the larger company’s industry, in addition to developing new
that a significant culture    technology of its own. More importantly, the smaller business is run by a group of
clash was erupting between    brilliant engineers/entrepreneurs who have developed a prototype of a less expensive,
their U.S. team and their     faster and more efficient version of the larger company’s main product.
peers within the new
                              The larger company develops a long-term strategy that includes acquiring this new
purchase.
                              technology, along with the talent from the smaller, Chinese firm. It plans to fold the
                              new technology into its own product line, have its engineers collaborate with their new
                              colleagues in China to develop add-on innovations, and then eventually supplant its
                              current offerings with the new products.

                              Everything, as they say, looked good on paper…

                              Post-deal, management at the larger company realised that a significant culture clash was
                              erupting between their U.S. team and their peers within the new purchase. IT systems
                              were incompatible; work processes were widely divergent and both sets of engineers were
                              unhappy at attempting to communicate through significantly different time zones.

                              Worse yet, because human resource efforts were not adequately or quickly coordinated,
                              key talent from the smaller company eventually resigned, feeling poorly treated by their
                              distant corporate parent. Costs spiked as fruitless efforts to refine the new technology ran
                              into design and production challenges. Shareholders and investors became irate as the
                              larger manufacturing company struggled for months to find a way to capture the value
                              everyone had seen in the beginning.

                              In the end, this merger, like many others, failed to provide any benefit to either party
                              and, in fact, produced just the opposite.

                              A Failure to Communicate: How a lack of information can derail integration

                              It’s perhaps not too far a stretch to point out that most marriage counsellors feel poor
                              communication contributes to a majority of unhappy unions.

                              In a post-merger setting, the same holds true. After an acquisition or merger, it is
                              management’s job to ensure everyone within the newly formed entity embraces a
                              common goal and that information is shared quickly, thoroughly and deeply within the
                              new organisation.

                              While on its surface that mandate seems straightforward, multiple problems can crop up
                              which make it difficult to implement.

4
Executing Effective M&A: Critical Considerations



                               For instance, consider the HR issue mentioned in the earlier example. Because the HR
                               team at headquarters had inadequate information post-merger, proper agreements
                               incentivising certain key members of the talent pool in the Chinese firm to remain with
                               the company for a set period weren’t implemented swiftly. That meant both talent and
                               skill was lost.

                               Add to that the fact that the culture between the two entities was vastly different. The
                               management at the Chinese acquisition was used to behaving in a nimble, entrepreneurial
                               and even authoritarian fashion, making decisions quickly and decisively. They strained
                               under what they saw as the slow, ponderous, bureaucratic behaviour of their new parent,
                               which made them both unhappy and suspicious. Engineers on both sides of the situation
                               viewed their counterparts with mistrust, and were further hindered by the practical
                               difficulties of sharing and reviewing information in any organised fashion. Sales efforts at
                               both companies stalled, while management struggled to create a new system to focus the
                               corporate strategy.

                               All the while, the strategic synergies, information and knowledge that the deal teams
                               shared at the negotiating table were lost, buried under the pressing day-to-day problems
                               that operating the business produced.

                               Using Technology to Facilitate Post-Merger Integration: VDRs provide a
                               common forum for secure communication

                               During both pre-deal and the due diligence phases, savvy dealmakers realise they
                               absolutely must have complete, accurate, timely and accessible information in order to
                               pave the way for a smooth M&A experience. Deal teams have to be able to find the
                               information they need, when they need it, and to know they can easily pose additional
                               questions about that information to the correct party when they need to.

                               That’s why a virtual data room (VDR) has become an indispensable tool for use during
                               M&A proceedings.

While VDRs have become         VDRs have made the entire deal-making process a smoother experience, putting mission-
commonplace as a critical      critical information in the hands of reviewers, and offering site-wide search features
tool in the due diligence      down to the page level which provide an unprecedented level of access to information.
process, they also serve as
                               While VDRs have become commonplace as a critical tool in the due diligence process,
an extremely cost-effective,
                               they also serve as an extremely cost-effective, efficient way to make post-integration
efficient way to make post-
                               efforts flow seamlessly.
integration efforts flow
seamlessly.                    The industry-leading VDRs are extremely secure document repositories located “in the
                               cloud” that can hold tens of thousands of pieces of confidential data. Accessible via the
                               Internet, a VDR removes the logistical problems that both distance and varying time
                               zones can create because any party who has been granted access can log into the VDR
                               from anywhere in the world, at any time, to find the information they need to make
                               decisions.

                               Users can immediately start to get their arms around the issues that affect their
                               departments and to better understand what new assets and expertise they’re gaining.

                               And because a VDR can be made accessible to anyone the VDR owner grants permission
                               to, it can be used as a tool to help drive information into a company. This means a wider
                               group of experts within an organisation can review information and thus management
                               achieves both buy-in and input when formulating a workable integration approach.

                               A high quality, industry-leading VDR enhances post-deal integration in a variety of ways:

                                                                                                                           5
First, if a VDR has been used to secure the merger or acquisition, then post-due diligence
                              information, documents, contracts and personnel information is already catalogued and
                              contained within the data room, complete with a user-friendly index that segregates
                              information into various categories, such as human resources or information technology.
                              The VDR owner can easily keep the data room open and operational post-merger or
                              acquisition, and then grant access to appropriate information, or sections of the site, to
                              key personnel responsible for integration of those areas.

if a VDR has been used        For instance, it’s possible to allow the head of IT and his or her team to examine all the
to secure the merger or       documentation about the acquisitions’ current operating systems in one easily searchable
acquisition, then post-due    archive. This allows a “10,000 ft. view” of the acquisition’s current capabilities; lets the
diligence information,        acquirer’s in-house team formulate actionable plans and discuss what they will need to
documents, contracts and      do to bring the new system into parity with the parent company, and provides an easy-
personnel information is      to-collaborate-in forum for sharing information with the other entity’s key personnel.
already catalogued and
                              And because the best VDRs offer unparalleled security to users, highly confidential and
contained within the data
                              technical information can be safely and easily shared between counterparts. In this case,
room, complete with a
                              the VDR removes barriers to communication and multiple users can see, and are making
user-friendly index that
                              decisions based on, the same information—which forestalls the problem of team
segregates information into
                              members “not knowing what they don’t know.”
various categories
                              Another benefit of a VDR is the comprehensive search functionality, allowing every piece
                              of information hosted on the site to be researched, especially for critical decisions based
                              on data that crosses functional boundaries within an organisation.

                              User activity can also be tracked inside the best VDRs, including pages accessed and
                              information reviewed. Team members can be certain that both they and their
                              counterparts have all the material they need to make informed decisions. An audit trail
                              feature within the VDR can be used to ensure that, in fact, all relevant team members
                              have indeed reviewed the information that affects their particular area.

                              Finally, should any questions arise regarding the documents housed within the VDR or
                              the data underlying them, a built-in Q&A function allows users to post questions in a
                              central location to be answered by the responsible party. This facilitates communication
                              because the workflow in the Q&A form allows an administrator to send e-mails to
                              department heads who will be responsible for those areas. Every aspect of the exchanges
                              is also tracked.

                              Using these tools, communication between both entities is improved because confusion
                              over who knows what is eliminated. It also automates the very labour-intensive, tedious
                              task of having to share, track and monitor data manually at each step.

                              Conclusion:

                              While a VDR has already become an integral part of both pre-deal preparation and due
                              diligence during a deal, it also offers a critical tool to users interested in improving the
                              odds of a successful post-merger integration. A VDR can be used to give employees a
                              common forum in which to confidentially share information at any time. Finally, a
                              VDR’s platform agnostic, centralised location “in the cloud” allows it to serve both as a
                              communication and a collaboration tool, both essential to post-deal integration.




6
About Merrill DataSite

                              Merrill DataSite is a secure virtual data room (VDR) solution that optimises the due diligence
                              process by providing a highly efficient and secure method for sharing key business information
                              between multiple parties. Merrill DataSite provides unlimited access for users worldwide, as well
                              as real-time activity reports, site-wide search at the document level, enhanced communications
                              through the Q&A feature and superior project management service — all of which help
                              reduce transaction time and expense.

                              Merrill DataSite’s multilingual support staff are available from anywhere in the world, 24/7,
                              and can have your VDR up and running with thousands of pages loaded within 24 hours
                              or less.

                              With its deep roots in transaction and compliance services, Merrill Corporation has a
                              cultural, organisation-wide discipline in the management and processing of confidential
                              content. Merrill DataSite is the first VDR provider to understand customer and industry
                              needs by earning an ISO/IEC 27001:2005 certificate of registration — the highest standard
                              for information security — and is currently the world’s only VDR certified for operations in
                              the United States, Europe and Asia. Merrill DataSite’s ISO certification is available for review
                              at www.datasite.com/security.htm.

                              As the leading provider of VDR solutions, Merrill DataSite has empowered nearly two million
                              unique visitors to perform electronic due diligence on thousands of transactions totalling
                              trillions of dollars in asset value. Merrill DataSite VDR solution has become an essential tool
                              in an efficient and legally defensible process for completing multiple types of financial
                              transactions. Learn more by visiting www.datasite.com today.

                              About Merrill Corporation

                              Founded in 1968 and headquartered in St. Paul, Minn., Merrill Corporation
                              (www.merrillcorp.com) is a leading provider of outsourced solutions for complex business
                              communication and information management. Merrill’s services include document and
                              data management, litigation support, language translation services, fulfilment, imaging
                              and printing. Merrill serves the corporate, legal, financial services, insurance and real
                              estate markets. With more than 5,000 people in over 40 domestic and 22 international
European Headquarters         locations, Merrill empowers the communications of the world’s leading organisations.
101 Finsbury Pavement
London EC2A 1ER, UK
+44 (0)207 562 3200

Merrill Communications
World-Wide House, 5th Floor
19 Des Voeux Road Central
Hong Kong
+852 2536 6640

Corporate Headquarters
One Merrill Circle
St. Paul, MN 55108
800.688.4400

Offices in major cities
throughout the world

info@datasite.com
www.datasite.com              Windows, Windows Explorer and Microsoft Outlook are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries.
                              All rights reserved. MD0219_1



                                               M E R R I L L                                                     D A T A S I T E

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Executing effective m&a, part 3 – post deal integration

Learn Past Exp
Learn Past ExpLearn Past Exp
Learn Past Exp
euwebtc01
 
Learn Past Exp
Learn Past ExpLearn Past Exp
Learn Past Exp
euweben01
 
Learn Past Exp
Learn Past ExpLearn Past Exp
Learn Past Exp
euwebsc01
 
Triallianceeffect 100510013748-phpapp02
Triallianceeffect 100510013748-phpapp02Triallianceeffect 100510013748-phpapp02
Triallianceeffect 100510013748-phpapp02
jorge andres
 
How structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
How structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sectorHow structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
How structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
Tom De Ruyck
 
The organization of the future tact presentation fri. sept. 9. 2011
The organization of the future tact presentation fri. sept. 9. 2011The organization of the future tact presentation fri. sept. 9. 2011
The organization of the future tact presentation fri. sept. 9. 2011
lanre_oyegbola
 
ADMA_FINALDigital_Whitepaper-Digital_Edition
ADMA_FINALDigital_Whitepaper-Digital_EditionADMA_FINALDigital_Whitepaper-Digital_Edition
ADMA_FINALDigital_Whitepaper-Digital_Edition
David Hirsch
 

Similaire à Executing effective m&a, part 3 – post deal integration (20)

Learn Past Exp
Learn Past ExpLearn Past Exp
Learn Past Exp
 
Learn Past Exp
Learn Past ExpLearn Past Exp
Learn Past Exp
 
Learn Past Exp
Learn Past ExpLearn Past Exp
Learn Past Exp
 
Key decisions for procurement professionals: How to balance internal and exte...
Key decisions for procurement professionals: How to balance internal and exte...Key decisions for procurement professionals: How to balance internal and exte...
Key decisions for procurement professionals: How to balance internal and exte...
 
Getting past yes
Getting past yesGetting past yes
Getting past yes
 
Vertical chain and transactional cost economy (tce)
Vertical chain and transactional cost economy (tce)Vertical chain and transactional cost economy (tce)
Vertical chain and transactional cost economy (tce)
 
Managing innovation within firms-Chapter 4 (Paul Trott).pptx
Managing innovation within firms-Chapter 4 (Paul Trott).pptxManaging innovation within firms-Chapter 4 (Paul Trott).pptx
Managing innovation within firms-Chapter 4 (Paul Trott).pptx
 
Bridging 110325 cs3.indd
Bridging 110325 cs3.inddBridging 110325 cs3.indd
Bridging 110325 cs3.indd
 
Triallianceeffect 100510013748-phpapp02
Triallianceeffect 100510013748-phpapp02Triallianceeffect 100510013748-phpapp02
Triallianceeffect 100510013748-phpapp02
 
10 Best Practices For Deal Flow Mgt
10 Best Practices For Deal Flow Mgt10 Best Practices For Deal Flow Mgt
10 Best Practices For Deal Flow Mgt
 
How structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
How structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sectorHow structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
How structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
 
The organization of the future tact presentation fri. sept. 9. 2011
The organization of the future tact presentation fri. sept. 9. 2011The organization of the future tact presentation fri. sept. 9. 2011
The organization of the future tact presentation fri. sept. 9. 2011
 
Marketing Collaborations made easy!
Marketing  Collaborations made easy!Marketing  Collaborations made easy!
Marketing Collaborations made easy!
 
How structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
How structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sectorHow structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
How structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
 
Increasing M&A Success Rate with Design Thinking
Increasing M&A Success Rate with Design ThinkingIncreasing M&A Success Rate with Design Thinking
Increasing M&A Success Rate with Design Thinking
 
Five Guidelines to Delivering Products that Create Impact in Communications, ...
Five Guidelines to Delivering Products that Create Impact in Communications, ...Five Guidelines to Delivering Products that Create Impact in Communications, ...
Five Guidelines to Delivering Products that Create Impact in Communications, ...
 
ADMA_FINALDigital_Whitepaper-Digital_Edition
ADMA_FINALDigital_Whitepaper-Digital_EditionADMA_FINALDigital_Whitepaper-Digital_Edition
ADMA_FINALDigital_Whitepaper-Digital_Edition
 
Driving Standardization Across a Complex Organization
Driving Standardization Across a Complex OrganizationDriving Standardization Across a Complex Organization
Driving Standardization Across a Complex Organization
 
McKinsey on Finance
McKinsey on FinanceMcKinsey on Finance
McKinsey on Finance
 
Maximizing Return On Innovation
Maximizing Return On InnovationMaximizing Return On Innovation
Maximizing Return On Innovation
 

Executing effective m&a, part 3 – post deal integration

  • 1. White Paper PART 3 OF 3 Executing Effective M&A: Critical Considerations from Pre- to Post-Deal: Part III M E R R I L L D A T A S I T E
  • 2. Contents PART 3 OF 3 Executive Summary 3 Due Diligence Post-Deal: Turning projections and “wishful thinking” into reality 4 A Failure to Communicate: How a lack of information can derail integration 4 Using Technology to Facilitate Post-Merger Integration: VDRs provide a common forum for secure communication 5 Conclusion 6
  • 3. Executing Effective M&A: Critical Considerations Executive Summary Executive Summary M&A transactions that succeed in creating enhanced value always follow certain steps before, during and after the deal itself. In the previous instalment of Executing Effective M&A, we examined some of the best practices for due diligence during an M&A transaction. In this, the final instalment of our 3-part series, we examine industry best practices for maximising value and capturing synergies after the deal is done. Thinking innovatively and leveraging best-in-class technology to facilitate communication can enhance prospects for a successful post-merger integration of two entities, and the creation of lasting value post-transaction. Much has been written over the years about once-promising M&A deals that were initially greeted with breathless excitement by all parties involved, but which ultimately and definitively disappointed. (AOL/Time Warner seems to stand out as the poster child example of a “failure to thrive” in the post-merger world.) At its simplest, the maths behind mergers or acquisitions is straightforward: The participants believe they have found a way to make 1+1 equal 3, i.e. creating a final entity that is greater than the sum of its parts. The stated goal is always to target, select and then accomplish a deal that provides true, accretive value to the final entity, whether that value comes in the form of opening up a new market or geography, improving gross sales, streamlining costs, gaining access to technology or intellectual property, or some other more intangible benefit. To that end, during the due diligence process, deal teams on both sides of the table aggressively look for untapped opportunities and synergies that can be profitably exploited post-merger. Great care is taken during this phase of the deal to examine all The reasons for the failure the nuts and bolts of the potential partner’s customer list, assets, positioning in the of M&A deals are myriad, market, prospects, distribution chain and much more. Every contract is intently but the underlying fact examined for portents that might reveal the future fortunes of an asset, or any hidden seems to be that the value secrets. Inventory and other assets are counted and verified almost up to the moment the deal teams thought the final M&A documents are signed. Management claims are checked, double-checked they saw during the due and triple-checked, all in an effort to prove to the acquiring company that what it sees as diligence process failed to potential value is real—and that the value can be profitably capitalised upon once the materialise once all parties rice has been thrown and the new marriage begins. had shaken hands and However, even with all that painstaking care, many, if not most, mergers “fail” in one walked out of the room. way or another. Sales fall. New markets prove anaemic. Clashes occur between sales professionals and strategy becomes fragmented, or worse, non-existent. The reasons for the failure of M&A deals are myriad, but the underlying fact seems to be that the value the deal teams thought they saw during the due diligence process failed to materialise once all parties had shaken hands and walked out of the room. Now, instead of 1+1=3, the sum of the whole proves decidedly less than its parts. That’s why smart dealmakers realise that executing effective M&A extends far beyond the conference room, and that for a deal to be truly successful, a thoughtful, considered post-merger integration plan must be identified, communicated to all employees and then methodically implemented over a period of months or even years, with periodic updates designed to measure any value created and the synergies being realised. 3
  • 4. Due Diligence Post-Deal: Turning projections and “wishful thinking” into reality It’s perhaps ironic that so much energy, time and effort is expended in M&A ventures during pre-deal and due diligence phases, while relatively scant attention is paid to continuing that level of observation during the post-deal time frame. In a sense, it’s as if management and the deal teams feel that their job has concluded once the ink has dried on the contract. Nothing, of course, could be farther from the truth. Let’s take a hypothetical example: Imagine a large, well-established U.S. manufacturing company with a profitable, if somewhat niche market has decided its core product line could ultimately be rendered obsolete based on new technology that has been developed by a smaller company located in China. Post-deal, management at While the smaller Chinese entity is underfunded, it has established a solid core business the larger company realised in an offshoot of the larger company’s industry, in addition to developing new that a significant culture technology of its own. More importantly, the smaller business is run by a group of clash was erupting between brilliant engineers/entrepreneurs who have developed a prototype of a less expensive, their U.S. team and their faster and more efficient version of the larger company’s main product. peers within the new The larger company develops a long-term strategy that includes acquiring this new purchase. technology, along with the talent from the smaller, Chinese firm. It plans to fold the new technology into its own product line, have its engineers collaborate with their new colleagues in China to develop add-on innovations, and then eventually supplant its current offerings with the new products. Everything, as they say, looked good on paper… Post-deal, management at the larger company realised that a significant culture clash was erupting between their U.S. team and their peers within the new purchase. IT systems were incompatible; work processes were widely divergent and both sets of engineers were unhappy at attempting to communicate through significantly different time zones. Worse yet, because human resource efforts were not adequately or quickly coordinated, key talent from the smaller company eventually resigned, feeling poorly treated by their distant corporate parent. Costs spiked as fruitless efforts to refine the new technology ran into design and production challenges. Shareholders and investors became irate as the larger manufacturing company struggled for months to find a way to capture the value everyone had seen in the beginning. In the end, this merger, like many others, failed to provide any benefit to either party and, in fact, produced just the opposite. A Failure to Communicate: How a lack of information can derail integration It’s perhaps not too far a stretch to point out that most marriage counsellors feel poor communication contributes to a majority of unhappy unions. In a post-merger setting, the same holds true. After an acquisition or merger, it is management’s job to ensure everyone within the newly formed entity embraces a common goal and that information is shared quickly, thoroughly and deeply within the new organisation. While on its surface that mandate seems straightforward, multiple problems can crop up which make it difficult to implement. 4
  • 5. Executing Effective M&A: Critical Considerations For instance, consider the HR issue mentioned in the earlier example. Because the HR team at headquarters had inadequate information post-merger, proper agreements incentivising certain key members of the talent pool in the Chinese firm to remain with the company for a set period weren’t implemented swiftly. That meant both talent and skill was lost. Add to that the fact that the culture between the two entities was vastly different. The management at the Chinese acquisition was used to behaving in a nimble, entrepreneurial and even authoritarian fashion, making decisions quickly and decisively. They strained under what they saw as the slow, ponderous, bureaucratic behaviour of their new parent, which made them both unhappy and suspicious. Engineers on both sides of the situation viewed their counterparts with mistrust, and were further hindered by the practical difficulties of sharing and reviewing information in any organised fashion. Sales efforts at both companies stalled, while management struggled to create a new system to focus the corporate strategy. All the while, the strategic synergies, information and knowledge that the deal teams shared at the negotiating table were lost, buried under the pressing day-to-day problems that operating the business produced. Using Technology to Facilitate Post-Merger Integration: VDRs provide a common forum for secure communication During both pre-deal and the due diligence phases, savvy dealmakers realise they absolutely must have complete, accurate, timely and accessible information in order to pave the way for a smooth M&A experience. Deal teams have to be able to find the information they need, when they need it, and to know they can easily pose additional questions about that information to the correct party when they need to. That’s why a virtual data room (VDR) has become an indispensable tool for use during M&A proceedings. While VDRs have become VDRs have made the entire deal-making process a smoother experience, putting mission- commonplace as a critical critical information in the hands of reviewers, and offering site-wide search features tool in the due diligence down to the page level which provide an unprecedented level of access to information. process, they also serve as While VDRs have become commonplace as a critical tool in the due diligence process, an extremely cost-effective, they also serve as an extremely cost-effective, efficient way to make post-integration efficient way to make post- efforts flow seamlessly. integration efforts flow seamlessly. The industry-leading VDRs are extremely secure document repositories located “in the cloud” that can hold tens of thousands of pieces of confidential data. Accessible via the Internet, a VDR removes the logistical problems that both distance and varying time zones can create because any party who has been granted access can log into the VDR from anywhere in the world, at any time, to find the information they need to make decisions. Users can immediately start to get their arms around the issues that affect their departments and to better understand what new assets and expertise they’re gaining. And because a VDR can be made accessible to anyone the VDR owner grants permission to, it can be used as a tool to help drive information into a company. This means a wider group of experts within an organisation can review information and thus management achieves both buy-in and input when formulating a workable integration approach. A high quality, industry-leading VDR enhances post-deal integration in a variety of ways: 5
  • 6. First, if a VDR has been used to secure the merger or acquisition, then post-due diligence information, documents, contracts and personnel information is already catalogued and contained within the data room, complete with a user-friendly index that segregates information into various categories, such as human resources or information technology. The VDR owner can easily keep the data room open and operational post-merger or acquisition, and then grant access to appropriate information, or sections of the site, to key personnel responsible for integration of those areas. if a VDR has been used For instance, it’s possible to allow the head of IT and his or her team to examine all the to secure the merger or documentation about the acquisitions’ current operating systems in one easily searchable acquisition, then post-due archive. This allows a “10,000 ft. view” of the acquisition’s current capabilities; lets the diligence information, acquirer’s in-house team formulate actionable plans and discuss what they will need to documents, contracts and do to bring the new system into parity with the parent company, and provides an easy- personnel information is to-collaborate-in forum for sharing information with the other entity’s key personnel. already catalogued and And because the best VDRs offer unparalleled security to users, highly confidential and contained within the data technical information can be safely and easily shared between counterparts. In this case, room, complete with a the VDR removes barriers to communication and multiple users can see, and are making user-friendly index that decisions based on, the same information—which forestalls the problem of team segregates information into members “not knowing what they don’t know.” various categories Another benefit of a VDR is the comprehensive search functionality, allowing every piece of information hosted on the site to be researched, especially for critical decisions based on data that crosses functional boundaries within an organisation. User activity can also be tracked inside the best VDRs, including pages accessed and information reviewed. Team members can be certain that both they and their counterparts have all the material they need to make informed decisions. An audit trail feature within the VDR can be used to ensure that, in fact, all relevant team members have indeed reviewed the information that affects their particular area. Finally, should any questions arise regarding the documents housed within the VDR or the data underlying them, a built-in Q&A function allows users to post questions in a central location to be answered by the responsible party. This facilitates communication because the workflow in the Q&A form allows an administrator to send e-mails to department heads who will be responsible for those areas. Every aspect of the exchanges is also tracked. Using these tools, communication between both entities is improved because confusion over who knows what is eliminated. It also automates the very labour-intensive, tedious task of having to share, track and monitor data manually at each step. Conclusion: While a VDR has already become an integral part of both pre-deal preparation and due diligence during a deal, it also offers a critical tool to users interested in improving the odds of a successful post-merger integration. A VDR can be used to give employees a common forum in which to confidentially share information at any time. Finally, a VDR’s platform agnostic, centralised location “in the cloud” allows it to serve both as a communication and a collaboration tool, both essential to post-deal integration. 6
  • 7. About Merrill DataSite Merrill DataSite is a secure virtual data room (VDR) solution that optimises the due diligence process by providing a highly efficient and secure method for sharing key business information between multiple parties. Merrill DataSite provides unlimited access for users worldwide, as well as real-time activity reports, site-wide search at the document level, enhanced communications through the Q&A feature and superior project management service — all of which help reduce transaction time and expense. Merrill DataSite’s multilingual support staff are available from anywhere in the world, 24/7, and can have your VDR up and running with thousands of pages loaded within 24 hours or less. With its deep roots in transaction and compliance services, Merrill Corporation has a cultural, organisation-wide discipline in the management and processing of confidential content. Merrill DataSite is the first VDR provider to understand customer and industry needs by earning an ISO/IEC 27001:2005 certificate of registration — the highest standard for information security — and is currently the world’s only VDR certified for operations in the United States, Europe and Asia. Merrill DataSite’s ISO certification is available for review at www.datasite.com/security.htm. As the leading provider of VDR solutions, Merrill DataSite has empowered nearly two million unique visitors to perform electronic due diligence on thousands of transactions totalling trillions of dollars in asset value. Merrill DataSite VDR solution has become an essential tool in an efficient and legally defensible process for completing multiple types of financial transactions. Learn more by visiting www.datasite.com today. About Merrill Corporation Founded in 1968 and headquartered in St. Paul, Minn., Merrill Corporation (www.merrillcorp.com) is a leading provider of outsourced solutions for complex business communication and information management. Merrill’s services include document and data management, litigation support, language translation services, fulfilment, imaging and printing. Merrill serves the corporate, legal, financial services, insurance and real estate markets. With more than 5,000 people in over 40 domestic and 22 international European Headquarters locations, Merrill empowers the communications of the world’s leading organisations. 101 Finsbury Pavement London EC2A 1ER, UK +44 (0)207 562 3200 Merrill Communications World-Wide House, 5th Floor 19 Des Voeux Road Central Hong Kong +852 2536 6640 Corporate Headquarters One Merrill Circle St. Paul, MN 55108 800.688.4400 Offices in major cities throughout the world info@datasite.com www.datasite.com Windows, Windows Explorer and Microsoft Outlook are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved. MD0219_1 M E R R I L L D A T A S I T E