1. S I P
Synoptic IP’s knowledge repository and news section
In the field of intellectual property a patent troll is very nearly related to licensing.
It is the name given to an organization or a person who utilizes the license and
patent prosecution as the fundamental financial action. The patent troll name
was utilized within 1993 to depict organizations that bring numerous patent
violation litigation cases. The term was advanced by Peter Detkin in 2001 when he
worked for Intel.
A small description
This kind of organization is all the more generally alluded to as Non Practicing Entity (NPE) ("enterprise without
action") as their fundamental characteristic is not to process any types of process or product. This model is
likened to extort: the organization secures one or more licenses in the specialized field that it doesn't work
itself. It then looks to contract working licenses of its value proprietorship from organizations handling the
merchandise or administrations by debilitating a summons to court for intrusion of said patents. Such action is
often dependent upon questioned licenses whose lawful quality is feeble.
In this way, a real piece of prosecution including patent trolls, are dependent upon programming licenses or
business strategy licenses. Their targets could be vast organizations to little technology organizations that can't
raise the fundamental funds for a trial.
How issues are made
Organizations regularly pay the patent troll in light of the fact that in the most
terrible environment, the organization is restricted from utilizing the
innovation asserted as a part of the patent, and in the ideal situation,
legitimate expenses are well above what is asked by the patent troll,
regardless of the fact that the case is won. The action of patent trolls is
restricted to the obtaining, valuation and auction of patents.
A patent troll can additionally be paid to secure an organization against an
alternate patent troll. If an alternate patent troll sues the organization, the
Patent Troll defender will counter-assault this patent troll with the utilization
of different licenses. The patent trolls consent to settle such sort of
circumstance peaceably.
Synoptic IPSimplified Solutions
ART002 – 30th April, 2014
“Non-practicing entities
(NPEs) are less successful
than Practicing entities in
Litigation. Success rate
being 34% for practicing
entities and only 23% for
NPEs.”
Data is based on PWCs
annual litigation report.
© 2013 – 2014 Synoptic Intellectual Patents Private Limited. All Rights Reserved.
Need for new approach
To clash this misuse, a worldwide reflection on the purpose and capacity of patent law as it is seen today
appears essential. The action of patent trolls can restore a parity of force between distinct innovators and
extensive groupings against which they might generally have no barrier against encroachment. The normal
expense of a claim for encroachment has arrived at a huge number of dollars.
Synoptic IP News updates and articles
Patent trolls - New strategies needed to fix the issue.

2. Procedures of patent trolls are
legitimate. It is just the right
accessible to any holder looking to
implement a working syndication
that is given by getting a patent.
The meaning of NPE could apply to
numerous parties including IBM.
This organization offers patent
licenses in a specialized field that it
doesn't work itself.
The current change of patent law in
the United States raises a civil
argument on the part of these
practices. The Obama organization
has set up a first arrangement of
solid measures equipped for
restricting the force of patent trolls.
In US
In the United States, a disastrous trick in patent law permits individuals to make an unclear patent that is
planned to be something that an alternate organization would likely make; after which point, the patent filer
will file suit against the organization that made the item, contending that the organization stole their thought.
This is alluded to as "patent trolling".
Nintendo was hit with an allegation for itself for the outline of the Nintendo GameCube controller. While it
won in the lower court, an engage higher court to turn out the decision, permitting the sale of the controllers.
This is for the most part selective to the United States, as patent laws outside of it are very diverse. There
have been calls to update the laws, with individuals contending that it forestalls change because of reason
that another gadget will experience harsh criticism from a patent troll who is trying to take a portion of the
benefit made off of it.
Some more study
The other piece of the meaning of being a patent troll implies that the individual who obtained the patent
could possibly have the plan of regularly utilizing it. At the end of the day, the patent troll does not so much
need to exploit the patent that was bought to make items and make a benefit from it.
The principle reason behind obtaining the patent was to have the power to sue different organizations and
experience the benefits that they have produced from the engineering. This makes the patent troll a loathed
element in the business world.
© 2013 – 2014 Synoptic Intellectual Patents Private Limited. All Rights Reserved.
Around the boundaries, one specifically ought to make it required to reveal to the court all the persons that
may have a money related enthusiasm toward this criticism. For the Obama organization, the measures have
clear goals to expand the useful expenses of patent trolls since the upstream work of the legal procedure
might be significantly more considerable.
Patents are utilized for great reason - without them, an individual or organization could discharge an item, and
anybody could utilize the same engineering, or in any event a very much alike innovation, and not need to
credit the inventors or, on the off chance if they utilized it vindictively, not pay them monarchs on the product.

3. For a free trial of our services, please write us at
info@synopticip.com OR
Synoptic Intellectual Patents Pvt. Ltd.
G1 Ideal House 69
Nehru Place, New Delhi
Delhi-110019
+91-120-454-1298 (India), +44 2032873323 (UK)
Patentability/Novelty Search
InvaliditySearch
Patent Drafting
State-of-the-Art/Landscape Analysis
Infringer identification
Technology Trend Analysis
Freedom-to-OperateSearch
Claim Charting/EoU IdentificationPatent Docketing
Synoptic IP Simplified searching solution to your IP
www.synopticip.com
Synoptic IP
SimplifiedSolutions
Patent Prosecution Support
• Patentability/ Novelty search
• Patent drafting
• Illustrations/ Drawing
Preparation
• Office Action Response
• Infringement Search
• Claim charting/ EoU Identification
• Freedom-to-Operate Search
• Infringers/ Licensee identification
• State-of-the-Art/ Landscape
Analysis
• Technology Trend Analysis
• White space/ spot analysis
• Patent Filing in India
• Patent Docketing
• Proof Reading
• Alerts and Watches
Synoptic IP, is an Intellectual Property Research firm based in India, providing efficacious patent research services to their clients across the globe. We bring a
team of dedicated technical experts hailing from meritorious academic backgrounds, committed to provide a diverse range of patent research services.
We provide the highest standards of quality assurance to clients with our in-depth understanding of the subject matter in hand and suitably customized services
pertaining to varied domains of science and technology. Our state-of-the-art methodologies help us maintain and appraise the quality of a project at every break
point and consign precise, glitch-free reports to our clients.
About Synoptic IP
Research and Analytics Patent Litigation and Licensing support Other service
Read more
Other individuals who may be recognized to be patent trolls are in
category that authorize their licenses, yet don't perform any examination
of their own. They don't have innovative work divisions in their
organizations, on the grounds that they are not going to produce any
items or services dependent upon the patent. They are seen as
individuals who are exploiting the organizations that are examining the
innovation and creating new improvements.
On the off chance if an organization has been made with the sole reason
for authorizing its patent rights against different organizations, it is said
“In year 2012, patent
trolls or patent assertion
entity (PAEs) brought the
majority (62%) of patent
lawsuits.”
to be a patent troll. In the business world, patent troll claims are recognized to be unimportant along the lines
of suing Mcdonald's in the wake of having been copied by the hot espresso. Those organizations suffering
because of these claims frequently decide to settle out of court, as it might take them a great deal more to
protect themselves than to consent to pay a huge number of dollars. Else, they may have a large number of
dollars in lawful charges to fight with whether they win or not. Anybody alluded to as a patent troll, is not
somebody generally recognized in the business group.
For more details, please contact:
Ankit Saxena, Director – Research
ankit.saxena@synopticip.com
+91-9560266647